Samsung Bespoke Jet Review - 12+ Tests and Analysis

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 23

  • @BrentNelson
    @BrentNelson 7 месяцев назад +5

    I've owned this vacuum for about a year now and it's been really wonderful - glad to seem you think the same!

  • @hasankalayci6286
    @hasankalayci6286 5 месяцев назад +2

    Why didn't you review the black one which is the top of the line in the bespoke series. Would be interesting to see the comparison with dyson

  • @annettesingleton736
    @annettesingleton736 4 месяца назад +1

    I have one of these i think it is fantastic, dyson are to heavy anc and overated i have had both and this is much better in my apinion. 😊

  • @DaveQV
    @DaveQV 7 месяцев назад +2

    Do you use highest settings when you test crevice pick up performance?
    Thank you as always

  • @rada9942
    @rada9942 4 дня назад

    Thank you for your review, I can’t decide between the Samsung Bespoke Jet Plus and the Dyson V12 detect slim. Any recommendation?

    • @consumer-analysis
      @consumer-analysis  2 дня назад +1

      It's been a few months since I've tested cordless vacuums but off the top of my head - I would get the Samsung if storage and self-emptying are important to you and I would get the Dyson if light weight and maneuverability are important to you.

    • @rada9942
      @rada9942 День назад

      @@consumer-analysis thank you so much for your fast reply! I got the Samsung bespoke jet plus

  • @Mussa.H
    @Mussa.H 2 месяца назад

    Hi can you give me your opinion please? Would you recommend the Samsung bespoke jet, Dyson gen5 detect or dyson v15? Money isnt an issue, will use for mid heavy carpet and hardfloor, also i would just go all out for the dyson gen5 outsize but im in uk and they dont sell it here it seems. Thanks!

  • @davidtodd2104
    @davidtodd2104 4 месяца назад

    So glad I went with this model. I’ve had multiple Dysons in the past (V7, V8 and V10) and have always had issues regarding filters. When they start that on/off crap due to filter build-up, I lose it. Sometimes with Dyson (particularly the V7 and V8) you eventually have to clean them internally I.e. full strip down and clean as they have accumulated residue inside the cyclone assembly. If this happens then they become more sensitive to filter build up. To be fair, I have had my V10 for a couple of years now and it has been better than the older models. Regardless, I’ve sold up and eagerly await my new Bespoke Pro Plus Extra…

  • @llll24647
    @llll24647 3 месяца назад

    From the Vacuum Wars review of this vacuum, they say that the soft roller is apparently not motorized!

  • @saintejeannedarc9460
    @saintejeannedarc9460 7 месяцев назад

    Oh man, he was showing a Tineco filter at 55 seconds. I know that dreaded filter all too well. That's exactly what they look like, every single vacuum. You have to tap that thing out, and swap it, then use this vacuum gadget they give you to vacuum out the old filter for next use. It's a dusty mess and you lose major suction if you don't do that every single time you empty the dustbin. I came to dread dealing w/ it, and also that the dustbin had to be dug out and wouldn't just empty. Had to do that several times if I vacuumed my whole downstairs. The A11 Master seemed good at first, but now that I have a Shark Detect Pro, it is picking up years of debris the weak Tineco wasn't, and it has the self empty station. Battery life is terrible, but does a leap years better job.

  • @HosaBosa
    @HosaBosa 18 дней назад

    Im stuck between this one and the shark detector pro. Which is the better option?

    • @consumer-analysis
      @consumer-analysis  18 дней назад +1

      I would go with this Samsung over any Shark.

    • @HosaBosa
      @HosaBosa 17 дней назад

      @consumer-analysis ok sounds good I just liked the features of having abagless empty station and the deodorizer in it as well as the smart detection mode. Is there a vaccum that would be better than the Samsung bespoke jet for around the same price?

    • @consumer-analysis
      @consumer-analysis  17 дней назад +1

      @@HosaBosa The Bespoke Jet is the best option if you want a cordless vacuum with an auto-empty station. I personally really don't like the smell generated by Shark vacuums with deodorizers.

    • @HosaBosa
      @HosaBosa 17 дней назад

      @consumer-analysis awesome thank you much ill look around for some Is there any additional attachments I can buy separately for the jet or is that all it's compatible with what it comes with.

    • @HosaBosa
      @HosaBosa 13 дней назад

      @consumer-analysis I went with the shark detector pro do to finding it for $280 brand new if I don't like it I'll think more on the samsung mainly because we all use damsung devices but it was a little bit pricey for me to spend on a vacuum

  • @saranciuc7717
    @saranciuc7717 5 месяцев назад

    Your videos are really very well put together! What do you think between this and gen5 since these have pretty much the same price?
    I can't decide between this and dyson gen5 detect (I checked that video too) and I already ordered the dyson, fortunately I have plenty of time to return it and switch to Samsung.

    • @consumer-analysis
      @consumer-analysis  5 месяцев назад

      If you really value the Bespoke Jet's self-emptying feature, get the Samsung. Otherwise, I would go with the Dyson - more power, better deep cleaning, included soft roller cleaner head, etc.

    • @saranciuc7717
      @saranciuc7717 5 месяцев назад

      @@consumer-analysis thanks for reply! I would certainly miss features from dyson too! But not gonna lie, the self emptying feature from samsung is much cleaner.

  • @saintejeannedarc9460
    @saintejeannedarc9460 7 месяцев назад

    My Shark Detect Pro doesn't struggle w/ cheerios are larger debris at all. They do have a few kinks, like the soft brush roll, which has hybrid carpet fins. They should make the brush roll a bit more slippery so it doens't stick to carpet as much. But the anti tangle works excellent.