Sonex 1284 First Flight

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • This is just a short video of my first test flight. My Sonex is a tri-gear, dual-control, with the Jabiru 3300. I was really nervous, but the airplane handled great. I needed to limit the flight to just one time around the patch because I was reading high CHTs on the Jab's right cyclinders. Since then the cooling baffling has been fixed.
    This is not a highly polished video, but you can't go back and ever recreate the first flight. My wife had a hard time keeping the plane in the viewfinder!
    The project took about 1150 hours, but a lot of that was because of my personal modifications. These include a swing-back canopy with left or right entry, a horizontal cowling mod, hand-caliper actuated hydraulic brakes, and a fairly sophisticated electrical system (of course!).

Комментарии • 41

  • @free-birdrocker8809
    @free-birdrocker8809 2 года назад +1

    Awesome bird, love the paint scheme. My pop had a Sonerai 1 back in the 80's and it was a sizzler. It was white with green trim, had the wheel pants and it was a shoulder winged tail dragger. He got rid of it long ago but had a blast. Have fun in your Monett Sonex1

  • @charrb62
    @charrb62 10 лет назад +2

    Beautifully built airplane, and I really enjoyed this video. I am looking into LSAs right now and will definitely take a close look at the Sonex. I know that they make a couple of other models too, and that they are very affordable if you feel like putting the time into building them. Important factors for me are cabin width and useful load.
    I saw your other video with your niece. Enjoyed that one too and it looked like she had a great time.
    Thanks!

  • @sganzerlag
    @sganzerlag 2 года назад

    Great first flight, beautiful airplane! Thanks for sharing. Question: what did its empty weight come in at? Best regards from Brasilia, Brazil.

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  3 месяца назад +1

      700 lbs

    • @sganzerlag
      @sganzerlag 3 месяца назад

      @@oregonsonex wow that is super light! Especially considering it's a two-place aircraft.

    • @sganzerlag
      @sganzerlag 3 месяца назад

      That's substantially lighter than a j3 cub's empty weight. Even though the j3 has no electrical system.

  • @G56AG
    @G56AG 6 лет назад +3

    Nice looking plane. I noted that your first landing in the new plane that you landed with authority, I'm sure you have smoothed that out substantially since then. LOL

  • @tinolino58
    @tinolino58 10 лет назад +2

    very elegant paint sheme!
    Nice video: very inspiring!

  • @farhanfouadacca
    @farhanfouadacca 2 года назад

    Congrats. Lovely plane. I am planning to start building Sonex soon. How long did it take to finish yours?

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  2 года назад +2

      Thanks! It took about 3 years and 1000 hrs. It would have been quicker if I'd not drifted away from the plans in several areas such as the swing-back canopy and split cowl. It's been 9 years flying the plane with very little trouble. It's well behaved and a lot of fun to fly. I'd highly recommend the Sonex! Good luck.

    • @farhanfouadacca
      @farhanfouadacca 2 года назад

      1000 hours is not too bad. Was yours a quick build or a regular build?

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  2 года назад +2

      @@farhanfouadacca Regular build. I liked making all the small parts. I built the spar too. I bought the welded pieces.

    • @collinmossholder4570
      @collinmossholder4570 2 года назад

      @@oregonsonex from pallet to first flight what is the price range of this aircraft build

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  3 месяца назад

      @@farhanfouadacca Regular. Not a quick build.

  • @Eyes_in_the_Sky_Chad
    @Eyes_in_the_Sky_Chad 10 лет назад

    Great Build. I love the panel layout.

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  9 лет назад

      Thanks. It has really served me well. I love the MGL Enigma...and it's helped me out in bad weather (see Into MVFR and scud running! ruclips.net/video/9cyEDOFNSsY/видео.html )

  • @novicereloader
    @novicereloader 7 лет назад

    The taildragger looks cool, but the view you have in the trike will be the deciding factor for me. Nice plane.

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  7 лет назад

      Thanks! The visibility is incredible. I've heard the same thing from everyone who's ridden in the plane.

  • @fleite2005
    @fleite2005 11 лет назад +2

    Is it Jabiru 3300 or AeroVee?

  • @J3r3myPrince
    @J3r3myPrince 11 лет назад

    Nice Airplane I'm very jealous. Hope i'll be able to build my own LSA one day.

  • @erpautocon
    @erpautocon 10 лет назад

    Hi, tell me about your cruise speed with the jabiru 3300... I finish the Sonex 1650 but not fly yet.....

  • @bobbyjohnnascar
    @bobbyjohnnascar 9 лет назад

    Convert to water cooled heads= good idea.

  • @bryanstephens3562
    @bryanstephens3562 8 лет назад

    Why do all the Sonex AC I see use such a small diameter prop? Wouldn't a larger prop be more efficient? I'm new to the flying game so forgive me if this is a dumb question please. Also I think a larger prop would look more proportional.

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  8 лет назад

      +Bryan Stephens
      Bryan, Because of a combination of ground clearance (the plane sets low) and engine RPM. The Jabiru develops max HP and 3300 redlines ~3200 RPM. Many pilots run theirs at 3100+ all the time. I typically run between 2850 an 2950. You can do the math on the speed of the tips!

    • @bryanstephens3562
      @bryanstephens3562 8 лет назад

      +Mike Kelley
      I figured it was something like that. It did seem like the 100hp engine should have the stones to turn a bigger prop but I agree that ground clearance would be the deciding factor.

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  8 лет назад

      +Bryan Stephens
      If you are new to flying, you may not know this. The speed of the tip of the prop should always be subsonic, or less than 768 miles per hour. At the same RPM, the tips of larger props are actually moving faster!

  • @frankdearmond3372
    @frankdearmond3372 6 лет назад +1

    Great job, must have been an exciting moment! I'm starting on the SubSonex tail kit in about a month. Hope I am as successful as you!

  • @ElectronHexagon
    @ElectronHexagon 7 лет назад

    My Right ear was very lonely.

  • @DerPilotMann
    @DerPilotMann 9 лет назад

    How much extra work was the lighting for night flight? I imagine that it is worth the extra utility. I plan to use my Sonex for solo cross countries quite often, so I think having the capability to fly at night would be worthwhile. Opinions?

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  9 лет назад

      Well, the lights were extra work (and weight) However, I set mine up for wig-wag so on those grey cloudy days I get a little better visibility to other aircraft (of course my bright red paint doesn't hurt). If you are not going to fly at night, I wouldn't go to the trouble. Keep in mind you almost need 2; one pointed downward for taxiing, and one point out for looking down the runway.

    • @DerPilotMann
      @DerPilotMann 9 лет назад

      Mike Kelley
      Well, I think I will go without to start. I can always add them on later should I decide to do some night flying (or if I ding a wing somehow, I suppose it is a convenient way to repair the damage lol). Thanks for your feedback!

    • @oregonsonex
      @oregonsonex  9 лет назад

      DanTheSasquatch Pull the wire through the ribs when you build. They would be a B**** to do later!

    • @DerPilotMann
      @DerPilotMann 9 лет назад

      Noted! Thank you!

    • @Dr.Stacker
      @Dr.Stacker 9 лет назад

      Mike Kelley are experimental aircraft permitted to flying at night and for example IFR if had the avionics for it? Thanks

  • @cluberic
    @cluberic 11 лет назад

    Buy one and let me fly it

  • @J3r3myPrince
    @J3r3myPrince 11 лет назад

    get ur own bah