STUPID ATHEIST QUESTIONS
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- 1001 STUPID QUESTIONS ATHEISTS ASK CHRISTIANS... or maybe it's more like questions an atheist would never ask a christian.
STUPID ATHEIST QUESTIONS PART 2: • STUPID ATHEIST QUESTIO...
STUPID ATHEIST QUESTIONS PART 3: • STUPID ATHEIST!
Be my patreon! / jaclyn
Get my awesome tshirts! www.jaclynglenn...
Main channel: / jaclyn
Vlog channel: / jaclynvlogs
Music channel: / jaclynnoelmusic
Facebook: / jaclynglenn
Twitter: #!/...
Tumblr: / jaclynglenn
Google +: plus.google.co...
Vine: vine.co/u/1098...
Instagram: / jaclynglenn
I only accept friends that I know, but this is if you want to follow my personal facebook page: / jaclynlovescats
BUSINESS INQUIRIES ONLY: jaclynglenn@gmail.com
Please help support this channel!
Be my patreon! / jaclyn
or
Use the email jaclynglenn@gmail.com to donate via PayPal, or go to / jaclynglenn and click the "donate" button at the top right corner. =)
Send me snail mail! PO BOX listed @ / jaclynglenn
Thanks for watching this video on stupid questions that christians think atheists ask. Atheist VS Christian viewpoints on how we think are obviously very different. Honestly this sounds like a list of stupid questions that doubting christians would ask other christians to figure things out. Atheists don't care about god's underwear or wonder about angels. Just ridiculous x'D
WTF
I don't think that book is for debates.
That book is for helping Christians to continue in their preconceived notions of atheists.
this.
that
You're probably right.
Yeah, pretty much
Read this in entirety and you will find out the TRUTH... www.missionislam.com/science/book.htm
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence" - Christopher Hitchens
I'm pretty sure he wasn't the FIRST to say that... ;)
+Allan Floyd but he was the only one who was important enough to remember.
That's Karl Popper's philosophy and he's been pretty important.
There's nothing you can assert without evidence and nothing you can dismiss without evidence. ;b
JoniWan77 You just asserted that without evidence, and I dismiss it, proving you wrong... ;P
That book is a gigantic, never-ending inducing facepalm.
Thats more of humanity in general.
ikr i like how she talked about both sides
+Colin Vecera you made my day
ignorant atheist
Instead of asking why he cares what 2 adults do in the bed I would ask *WHY HE WATCHES?!*
I laughed so hard, I woke my whole family up😂😂😂
KingMDX 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀
I laughed so hard and I’m Christian
Lmao
God is a cuck. My next book title. Coming soon.
When I was an exchange student in the US, I told my host parents that I was not religious (I didn't say atheist because I didn't want to "offend" them). My host mum told me outright that she did not approve of me not believing in God. I went to church with them every Wednesday and Sunday. There was one Sunday when I asked them if I could stay at home, and I had argue my way through. I stayed at home, and I was told that they talked behind my back at the church. Later I told them I was gay, and they threw me out. What lovely and good-hearted people they were! I am Danish, by the way.
im so sorry a good part of my country is literally trash
+Fluffy Fluffleheimer the "Bible Belt" the part of the us Americans don't need
Yeah. There will always be terrible people in the world...
hence our need to extinguish the disgusting squalor proliferated as a result of religions popularity..
Yeah. There will always be terrible people in the world...
hence our need to extinguish the disgusting squalor proliferated as a result of religions popularity..
Fuck gays but love atheist
I think they just decided the amount of questions before they figured out what the questions were.
xXRezzXx actually they do..for the purpose of debate to prove, challenge, give evidence for why the Christian's have their belief. Atheist have been accused of mockery when its they are curious to why we believe in this mystic god of pagin an fable origins. I question all the time still..this is how I believe. I didnt go on this crazy BLIND faith. but I study..its just me..not me debating nonbelievers or try to make someone believe ..that is useless and Not my job. If God is almighty he can call his own to himself. And He does, and He can still. And He don't need a book to do this..If never had Torah or New testament God can reveal and do how He chooses whenever he chooses. TAKE THE BIBLE OUT he can still show up an all ways just like he did for one example he came in the flesh...He is God. The Hell concept is a lie ..but I know this because of my Hebrew background..MAN is not my teacher but The spirit of God is the one who gives truth. If I take Yeshua out of my belief..I would have no belief and would be an atheist just like you are! .Yeshua is the only way, truth, an life. but I don't enforce my belief on any unbeliever ..That's invasion and its not my job. God didnt invade me..why would I do this to another. Yeshua is not this evil like HARSH God that so many changed his word, just distorted an this was on purpose.. ..but Yeshua says his word is eternal ions and nobody can destroy, .even if all Bibles are burned up an have no more ..His word will never end. and * I believe Yeshua. Amen
Stacy LB ok
I like how they market this as a debate tool, but don't provide any answers to the questions
This is exactly what I thought 🤔
IKR, it's so easy to ask questions no one can be present to answer and then throw them at people who already think we're stupid monsters... I'd like to see them answering some of those questions, the ones that Atheists do ask.
Hi Blue Umbrella! Remember me? Poopypants McGee?
+Blue Umbrella Because there ARE NO answers to them.
They probably just repeat the question.
My friend is super Christian and doesn't believe in evolution. She said "a chimp can't become a human in 3 days" and I explained how it takes millions of years for evolution to happen. And she responded "the Earth has only been around for about 10,000 years." And I asked what about the fossils that are found billions of years ago. I'm not kidding you, she responded this. "God's version of time is different from ours. What a day is to him could be thousands of years for us." And I responded that she didn't answer my question at all, it didn't explain how fossils can be dated billions of years ago. And she again responded "you can't trust what science tells you all the time."
It's frightening to think that your friend has the right to vote.
Old comment but yeah, it's impossible to argue with them. There's a guy in a social circle I run in, he's not actually a bad guy and he's a good writer, so it's not like he's stupid or anything. But he's a very religious person and has completely drunk the religious koolaid, even with evolution fully explained he just couldn't accept it because of the Bible. He understood what I was saying by his own admission and even said it made sense, but objected because "The Bible says creatures don't change their 'kind'"
A couple weeks later I ended up talking some about ancient mesopotamia and mentioned the Sargon legend and stuff with this guy around, and he pointed out the parallels to Moses. I said yeah, there's quite a few parallels between the early story of Moses and the early story of Sargon (hell both were even Semitic raised in the court and culture of non-semites unless I'm mistaken) and it's theorised that that part of Moses story was a corrupted descendent of the Sargon legend and that a lot of the bible stories are linked to these older tales, like how Noah's was a descendent of the Epic of Gilgamesh
He couldn't accept that. He /had/ to make it work so the Bible was the truth. Even when all the evidence was showing that it was the Bible which was a misremembering of the story, he couldn't accept it. Instead he started weaving this absolutely impossible story where something must have happened even further back and the Sargon legend was a misremembering and exodus was the truth revealed through revelation (nevermind that Sargon becomes an emperor in his story and Moses becomes some guy who wanders around the desert for 40 years so the idea that they're both a mistelling of the same story rather than a bastardised merging of two different stories is absurd, with there being no archaeological evidence of a big exodus from Egypt but lots of evidence for Sargons existence...)
They simply have to move the goal posts, even when they have everything explained to them and all the evidence laid out for them, they will still reject it even if they admit it makes more sense the other way. It's honestly really frightening because it means there is absolutely no reasoning with them on a lot of their beliefs; even if they personally can see that you're right, they reject it because they are outsourcing their higher brain functions to an old book of fables.
well it's statistically proven that more ppl with lower intelligence believe in god. And your friend is a perfect example
I know a girl who looked me in the eyes and said that she believes dinosaurs are fake. According to her, the fossil record is a fraud placed there by scientists who wish to sway the general public away from religion so that more people believe their fake science.
She told me this years ago, and my brain is still trying to comprehend the fuckery.
first is she blond second you need a smarter friend
Intelligent atheists don't bother asking Christians ANY questions because it's a waste of time.
christians in a debate are like ostriches... when they don't like it they put their heads in the sand..
I prefer to ask the answer and try to have them hold on to Bronze Age ideology
***** not really. I've debated a lot of christians and it's true that it's simply a waste of time. Christians are blinded by their bullshit and when you bring up how bad their religion is they just stick their fingers in their ears and pretend it never happened while it's written in their own book. Sorry but it's simply a fact that debating those people is a waste of time and even debating a brick wall would be better than debating a christian because at least the brick wall wouldn't give retarded arguments like most christians do.
I'm a Christian, debate me🙂
which bible would u use to debate?
1001 strawman atheist questions.
+Sylvanas Windrunner exactly haha
+Sylvanas Windrunner For the Horde! jk i'm Alliance.
+JaclynGlenn yes they are straw man atheist questions, but they are not intended to be answered by atheist but by theist, for any person accepting evolution answering the question why there are different skin tones is easy, but now try the same thing without accepting evolution but taking the bible literally
kintai1000 yes but stupid atheist would ask these questions, but i still want to see a theist denying evolution would explain multiple skin tones
A lot of these questions, if they did happen to be asked, wouldn't be asked seriously. I've seen stupid questions like these asked sometimes by atheists but they 9/10 ask them to fuck with theists.
I have a question:
If God created us in his own image, that implies that he has arms, legs, a mouth, etc. Why would he need any of those? He can levitate things with his mind, so he doesn't need arms. He can fly and he never gets tired, so he doesn't need legs. He doesn't eat and he can communicate telepathically, so he doesn't need a mouth. If he created us in his image, then that implies he has a bunch of body parts he doesn't need. Doesn't having superfluous body parts conflict with the idea that he's perfect in every way?
+Dr Shaym You are absolutely right, such a body would have no functionality up there. I think what the prophets were trying to tell us is more about the spiritual side of our being. Our spirit is similar to god's spirit. I believe we are all one collective spirit, all part of one being, (made in it's image because we are it).
I'm just speculating, not a christian myself!
+Dr Shaym
If God is perfect and created humans in his image, why are so many humans so dumb?
+Dr Shaym I've actually heard an apologists response to this. It basically says that it doesn't mean our physical image, but our spiritual image. Yeah, it makes no sense, but that's christianity for ya.
+Jeff C hmm if you read the bible it doesn't say spiritual image. its pretty much straight forward when you read the whole creation story..image equals what god looked like.
+joops110 Well, think about it. If you go to Africa and ask them what their gods look like, they're all black. If you go to Asia and ask them, they're Asian. If dogs had gods, their gods would probably be dogs. Rabbits would worship a rabbit god, cats would worship a cat god, cows would worship a cow god, etc.
If the Christian God created humans in his own image, why aren't we all invisible?
Jonathan Nicoll I actually laughed out loud
Jonathan Nicoll, would you be in the image of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit - I suppose it definitely wouldn't be the Son, because he is already in the image of one of the other two.
+Jonathan Nicoll "God created humans in his own image" means that we have immortal spirit who will go back to the Creator, after we leave this world.
God created us to act like him, not to look like him. They never said God was invisible.
Ok, I'm an atheists but I hate it when an atheist asks this. As near as we can get we believe that the original translation meant "God created mankind with his divinity as part of their spirit" or something like that.
The funny thing is, the Bible tells Christians to hate the sin not the sinner.
So why the fuck did the author write; "Finally, a tool to debate Atheists"
Instead of "a debate on Atheism?"
Because it's not hate
Debate is not hatred
Debate isn't hatred. But you are still right, and these are straw man questions conducted by biased Christian assumptions.
I am a Christian, and really, those questions are vomit-inducing. And as Crybaby Kookies said, debate isn't hatred.
what i dont get is (and i know this becuase i go a christian school, not my choice, even tho im not christian) if the bible says that you shouldn't harm other people because they aren't christian, and people claim that they are christians and think that someone who isn't christian should die, then are they, accordint their own terms, truly christians?
As a swede who lives near to a babtist church and a Jehovas witnesses kingdom hall I can say that, yes, we find it VERY funny when they come knocking at our doors. And thus far I have not been converted.
+RedWolf Everyone hates when they come. I fuckin love it. I fuck with em sooooo hard.
+RedWolf i have a friend that bought a satanic bible just to fuck with them XD
+RedWolf I actually want a Mormon or Jehovah's Witness to come to my door. I'm going to open the door, and before they can say anything, i'll just ask them, "Excuse me, do you have a moment to talk about Lord Satan?"
+Ryan Cauffman Hercule Satan.
Yayyyyy. Sweden :)
God: Don't have an ego
God: Worship me or be tortured for eternity
SporkDork
You missed the rest of the story. Believe in me and have eternal life.
John H *YAS*
@@johnh226 Okay that literally doesn't invalidate that the other part just utterly shits on his "benevolence"
@@longingsoul1
Not really it demonstrates His power in redeeming humble sinners....reconciling them back to God
God works in mysterious ways
The real atheist question: If you believe in the bible why do you pick out the parts that you like, but ignore all of the parts that you don't like? If Old Testament doesn't matter, then why did it take a divine, perfect being two tries?
They will never answer you lol. Or if you ask why the Bible has so many contradictions and things that don't make sense. Never answered by a Christian ever.
Skrebz I’m not a christian but I don’t believe the Old Testament is for them. More for jews than the followers of Christ imo. And I don’t get why it is in the bible anyway. Christ said old things have gone away and all things have become new. I think it is in a part when they were talking about the old laws. Which ,to me, means the Old Testament are not “my” laws, hence, it is not christianity.
My understanding at present, is that (in one aspect of reading the bible) it should be taken as a story to follow.
In other words, how it was (story beginning, body), and how it turned out (story end). As such, the bible is illustrating an evolution. The OT showing the older way, the NT showing a newer way. This is an aspect to why people say Jesus (NT) fulfils the OT.
If you take a story like Harry Potter, maybe in earlier books he was afraid of eg Voldemort, but towards the end he no longer was (making this up as I go, really). As such, comments like * why do you pick and choose * provoke me to imagine someone picking one part of Harry Potter and trying to tell others that that one quote is the essence of the whole series... Not really a good understanding of HP, imho.
To give an example from the bible: in the OT there was a story of someone who cheated on their partner. This was seen as wrongful, and so the public wanted them punished by being stoned to death. (We humans today gasp)
Then in the NT, the same scenario was presented (a cheating spouse and people seeking punishment), but this time it was different. Here comes Jesus with a higher consciousness, and said, ok yes cheating is bad, but let the person without sin (mistake) cast the first stone (punish the cheater). Quite the contrast in dealing with the same situation.
So in this * biblical example *, we see how the OT was * fulfilled * by Jesus in the NT: he added that extra dimension/ layer of understanding. WIthout the OT, we would not have been able to see this contrast. Knowing the history and observing the change in thinking is a part of what makes the story special.
TLDR, cherry picking quotes in order to gain an understanding of the story as whole is folly. Don't watch 5 minutes of HP and say you now perfectly understand all 7 (?) HP books out. Texts such as the bible require study if one truly wants to gain insight to their existence - it's not something well understood at a glance.
Anyway that's my 2c for now! Hope you have a lovely day
As a Christian, I can totally agree with you Skrebz
Johanna Rivers good answer
Jesus looked like a Syrian refugee
uhhhhhhhhh. ohhhhhhhh shit
+DarKool81 LMAO
+DarKool81 Isn't it funny that if we didn't know any better, the government wouldn't let Jesus fucking Christ into our country. How fucking hilarious is that?? This supposedly Christian nation would discriminate against Christ. It's fucking golden.
Thexdmattx
exactly the irony I was trying to point out
+DarKool81 No wonder they killed him then.
Why worry about sinning if Jesus already died for your sins?
Chris Angelo this actually is a valid question
Good point
My question is if Jesus was the son of God, didn't he know that he wouldn't die by crucifixion but would rise again, how much of a sacrifice was it, really?
C D Hanks Good question, but think of it this way: If you were promised to be raised from the dead, but first you had to be spit on, and nailed to a cross with nails in your wrists and one for your feet, would you have the courage to do it? Religious or not, that would be painful I believe on an unimaginable level.
Jake Games jesus was a sado masochist so it gave him sexual arousement on an unimaginable level
When I told people in my school about evolution. One person said, a shrimp can't turn into a frog in a few days
I said it takes millions of years for animals to evolve
He answered, the earth hasn't been around for millions of years
I the slapped my face
Jurassic World don't let your dumb friend represent the smart religious people
Jurassic World it's true it hasn't dumb shit
Saint Smada I hope your joking.
Gnomey T.O idk what to tell you then... I believe in God and I also believe in evolution
Jose Coronax so that means you don't believe the Bible?
Bible did say God created this world 6000 thousand years ago, but Egypt has 7000 years history.
Which Part of the bible sais God creates egypt 6000 years ago?
Time is nothing more than an illusion
God Usoland what are you trying to say?
God Usoland thanks
The bible never said that
Why am I not surprised that the book seems to be stock full of straw man questions. In other words, questions that no serious atheist has ever asked, ever.
I strongly believe that the author of the book made up the vast majority (if not all) of those questions. The author has never heard them being asked, or even heard anybody say they were asked those questions. The author just invented the questions out of nothing. Which goes to show, once again, the dishonesty of Christian apologists.
Christians are good at making up something out of nothing
Wow... You must not be able to read. It doesn't take long to look through these comments and find, at least one person who admits to asking the "stupid questions"
And you know that how ?????
+Saber 1999 there are no stupid questions...
only srupid people ;p
No, there are lots of stupid questions.
Question: have you counted the questions to make sure there is actually 1001 of them? if not, could you sue the publisher?
If I had to sue the publisher for something, it would be for psychological and physical damage. See my half of my braincells died during this video.
But that's just the NAME of the book.
+ChinnuWoW but is it misleading In its premise/to the consumer as a non fictional,supposedly ‘educational text'.
+ChinnuWoW It might be a name but its also a fucking description. If I asked for chocolate ice cream and they gave me fuckin smashed baby skull flavored ice cream...... "Its just a name bro."
+Thexdmattx LOL I like your example
I'm a Christian, coming to this video knowing this book would be cringy as fuck. Boy was I right.
Yep. Basically every atheist video ever. "No God" you don't fucking know that. Neither do we, we just think that this giant universe came from something of a higher power. Not nothing. (Big Bang breaks many science laws, and they yip about the bible having contradictions ((usually Old Testament to new for some reason))))
+Jared Shope give me proof of a god being there
I am Your Father Uuuugh. I'm not typing all my reasons a 5th time to an atheist who won't listen to my arguments. Unless you promise to actually listen instead of plugging your ears so I don't waste my time again.
""No God" you don't fucking know that."
-Not many atheists claim that there is no god. Since most of you theists say that "god" is intelligible, incorporeal, etc it's awfully hard to disprove such a thing. There's a difference between saying "I don't believe that a god exists" and "I know that no god exists", ya know.
"Big Bang breaks many science laws"
-...Let me guess, thermodynamics? You know that the only people that say things like that AREN'T scientists and have no clue whatever what thermodynamics even MEANS? Or have you bothered to look up why these supposed "breaks" in the laws of science are just flat out wrong? I have, and I would be happy to clear up any misconception that you might have.
"usually Old Testament to new for some reason"
-Well, for me it's mostly the doctrines that I have a problem with. Such as original sin, eternal torture for crimes committed in a finite lifetime; the mass murdering of the various neighboring tribes in the Old Testament, human sacrifice (look up the story of Jephthah, saw a pastor try to give a sermon on that one once) just to name a few. Oh, and the whole thing where the only way Yahweh can fix the whole mess from the Old Testament is to sacrifice himself in human form, to himself, to undo the whole problem from Genesis that he created (him being Omniscient / Omnipotent). But yes, there's plenty of contradictions. Almost anyone who has studied it and is honest with themselves can tell you that, just look at who went to the tomb of Jesus first in the different books for example. Usually it gets explained away as "metaphorical" or something.
mstachife thermodynamics has to do with heat and energy. Nothing to do with the Big Bang. The supposed Big Bang was created when (no document EVER explains the actual initial reaction) and then the heat and energy spread into (absolute nothing). Our relative understanding of the Big Bang contradicts "matter cannot be created nor destroyed" which is a HUUGE universal law. And yes, the bible is VERY metaphorical. Like the Adam and Eve (*irony*) for starters, evolution doesn't desprove this at all. What the story really represents is God's first technical humans. Not necessarily 2, but you get the point. Anyways, Eve was created from Adams RIB or something "by his side" symbolizing Woman and Men side by side. And the snake symbolizing Satan. Snakes are always portrayed as evil and cynical. And no, I don't think Old Testament arguments are valid anymore. I'm not a Jew, I believe that Jesus was the savior. And you may ask, well why can't God just forgive us without a sacrifice? Well, forgiveness simply comes with a price. And Jesus was the reincarnation of God. He wasn't GOD himself, he just possessed the entities that made him the savior. He is chillin in heaven now so...cool. I don't dismiss that our God may not be the correct God. I have many other reasons I believe in this specific God as well. I can't imagine a universe this grand from either small atoms that combusted (we don't know where they came from if there was something that created everything) or a-b-s-o-l-u-t-e NOTHING created everything.
Good day and cheers
I'm atheist and I asked a Christian why they believed in god. They couldn't answer
Alessandra Haakma what don't you believe in a creator?
Being an atheist is more stupid than being a Christian. At least a Christian believes that's something created them you guys believe you came from a fart.
You would rather believe a complete fabrication because you don't have an actual answer instead of admitting that you don't know? And you call us stupid? cute.
Many christians answer to that question saying that they have a personal feeling of gods existence, others claim it is impossible for existence to exist without a god, and some others just say they have faith, you know, these type of answers.
You seem to forget that "magically appeared out of someone's asscrack" is the Christian position. Not sure whom you are arguing for here. Your preference for there being a creator has nothing to do with whether or not there actually is one.
Alessandra Haakma wtf that's not a real christian then
Six hundred and sixty six.... It takes Six hundred and sixty six crucifixions to actually kill Jesus ._. I'm uhh, fairly sure that's right... Don't quote me on it tho :|
oh my. Same thought
+JayLegacy100 No, it takes 42 executions.
No, it takes 1, every day, for the rest of time :D
+JayLegacy100 The question was already answered by the Tootsi pop owl. It's the same. ONE....TWO...A THRREEE!
Three.
+JayLegacy100 Actually you need to perform a ritual of blood magic, as Jesus is a lych
There are only 2 gods and real religions... "Ayy lmaonianity" and "The Spaghetti monster religion" both are equally as true one comes from space and provides dank memes when summoned and also has the dankest pepe collection known to man and the spaghetti monster originates from Italy and provides Ikea meatballs and Italian pasta... If you disagree you will die in a week.
You forgot the worshipers of the Waifu creators.
ALL HAIL THE WAIFY CREATORS XDDDDD
What about FilthyFrank you pleb. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Forgot about Lord of the HL3CUMFIRMED realm Lord Gaben (praised be his name) and the God of swamp and dank memes Senpai Desu-Shrek
Har
This book should be called "things Christian's think atheists think but atheists actually don't think and christians are just looking for an apparently self generated argument"
1001*
eyewars oh, true
Ikr I havent thought any of these things.
BPC does*
Wrong comment..
You monster...
How DARE you scribble in a book! I guess I will forgive this one though because the contend makes me want to burn it
xOkamiOniX
That is a true sin
Ruining books
I think "God" can forgive it because that is not a book
Its stupidty in paper form
You're only allowed to do that if you use a pencil
xOkamiOniX thanks for that
If you're writing a decent research paper, you're going to need to flag, highlight, and annotate in multiple colors so you have good evidence
I was going to say something but then I forgot what it was
Well it's called stupid questions, so the title of the book is pretty fair.
A Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim knocking on the door of a Swedish home proselytizing for conversions is like a Star Wars geek, a Trekkie and Battle Star Galactica nerd knocking on my door trying to convince me that one of those stories is actually real. The result would be a door slammed in someone's face in either situation.
+88Keyz102 I love answering the door, because I get to say, "I'm a gay liberal atheist, try me." and then watch the expression of horror creep across their face. And I'm not even kidding.
+88Keyz102 You might have to act as a referee as the consequence of that situation actually happening could very well be a big fight on your doorstep!
+88Keyz102
I don't think there are a lot of door-to-door jews. Mostly, it's people within the religion trying to convince other jews who aren't as religious, to be more religious.
(I'm Jewish, within a Jewish community)
+some person Agreed. Most Jews I know are Atheist.
+88Keyz102 That's a very good analogy, because everyone knows Firefly is the one true mythos.
Hi Jaclyn :)
I'm 15 and I started watching your videos about 1 or 2 weeks ago (I've been binge-watching them) and this week we watched "gods not dead" in classes. When I pointed out the stupidity of the film my teacher shouted at me that I'm supposed to take this serious like everyone else too and stopped me from talking. Religion rocks..
However, you kind of made an atheist out of me, so thanks, also credits to your influence, my teacher hates me now.:D
I would just like to say: you are not alone... don't worry about that teacher, you're on the right path, stay strong... cheers
+nuebish the first thing you should learn....it's athEIst, not athIEst :)
welcome to the club.
+nuebish congrats kiddo, you have more than the average count of brain cells lol, keep up the logic and learn for yourself, its much more fun when you research because you want to rather than being forced to.
I've got a lot to thank Jacklyn and other youtuber atheists for... I was already strugling with my own religious ideas when I found most of them, and they gave me the courage to question my beliefs and just be open about not believing in god anymore.
My parents kinda think I'm a big disappointment though... which is a shame! If only they could sit and talk about it like adults... however, it's been a good experience to deal with their prejudice, it's sort of a softcore practice for future interactions with radical believers. At least most of my friends at college are not very religious, most of them are atheists or thing the most part of any religion is bs, so I don't feel so alone anymore.
And hey... girl... it gets better.
+Natalia Almeida
Oops, a few corrections:
think*
Jaclyn*
XD
Ok so here's a real one. And you should trust this because I was a reverend. At the end of the gospels, after his death for all our sins, Jesus went into hell to free the souls held there. So this begs two questions.
1) why are christians so worried about going to hell
2) is Satan just down there all alone? Jesus took every one out and made sure no one else goes there.
Matt The Trucker What denomination were you?
Gicu Doru I was a pastor. I know scripture. I know the interpretations of gods will. Maybe you should stop relying on your preacher to cherry pick the good parts and actually read the book for yourself. Then you may understand that the god you think you know is far different from the one in that book.
+Matt The Trucker Many texts from the Old Testament seem to talk about the god of this world, who is the enemy of the Creator: *"Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don't believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don't understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God."* (2 Corinthians 4, 4)
However, regarding the Bible, it could be altered very easily by evil humans (tools of the fallen angels), over history, to manipulate people, and that's why most of the translations have lost the original purity of the messages (probably the orthodox scriptures have remained closer to the truth), but *a true Christian follows the goodness of Jesus Christ* and ignores those possible manipulated texts mainly from the Old Testament.
You don't believe in aliens? In this huuuuuge universe we're the only one? Then there would be only 1 planet with life from the billions of planets that exist. I don't think that's possible.
+amysw1 Compelling. Space travel's obviously no easy task, though.
+amysw1
Imagin 1 billion people each rolling 1 million sided dice and having it it land on the number they all said at the same time at random....
That is the chance of us living, although I do believe there must be other living things somewhere in this universe.
+alex xela The chance someone who is living is living is exactly 1, since dead people aren't living, and there is no third alternative, so what the hell are you talking about?
I'm talking about the chance of human beings being a thing, like this solar system being created, it just so happened earth what stationed in the zone not too warm or not too cold, that the earth is the size that it is, and that an object of large mass has not hit us already destroying all life.... if you couldn't tell what I meant then you must not understand much.
alex xela An object of large mass did hit us in the past... quite frequently actually. Life managed to survive one of these impacts.
Here's a stupid question : If God is the ultimate being and there is nothing past him, then does that make him an Atheist if he doesn't believe anything?
If God is the ultimate being that makes things out of his imagination or whatever it is and he created us in his image, then what use would he have for a head, arms, legs, and all that jazz?
No, the weirdest thing is that he would know he doesn't and can't exist
+Katriana Imnotgoingtosaymylastnametoanybody No, they don't know what they are talking about. Ever.
+Ehren Becker Also I'm a Hindu demigod incarnation if every Christian is God. But seriously, I'm really doing research on this Hindu stuff.
+KSSXerxes Channel Heheheehu
Man I wish I knew how many times it takes to actually kill Jesus. That question had me rolling lmao
Knowing the answer to that question could come in helpful one day if you know what I mean.
Lawrence Fernandez
Thats really rude...
Why?
Lawrence Fernandez I would like to answer this as it says in 1 Peter 3:18:
18 For Christ died once for all time for sins, a righteous person for unrighteous ones, in order to lead you to God. He was put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit.
And in Hewbrews 9:12:
12 He entered into the holy place, not with the blood of goats and of young bulls, but with his own blood, once for all time, and obtained an everlasting deliverance for us.
So the Bible teaches us that Jesus died 'once for all time', he died to atone for our sins and there is no need to do it again as it was done once. The scripture in 1 Peter 3:18 also says he was was put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit. Jesus died as a perfect man to atone for what Adam lost and passed on to us. Then God resurrected him as a spirit and has given him immortality we see this in Roman 6:9
9 For we know that Christ, now that he has been raised up from the dead, dies no more; death is no longer master over him.
So the answer to your question 'How many times does it take to kill Jesus' is once as he can no longer die because he is immortal.
As a Christian myself I did find that book ridiculous. That is not the way to go about helping people who ask sincere questions about our faith as 1 Peter 3:15 says
15 But sanctify the Christ as Lord in your hearts, always ready to make a defense before everyone who demands of you a reason for the hope you have, but doing so with a mild temper and deep respect.
Remember kids if you don't sin Jesus died for nothing.
Q1:
Actually, I have met a woman who said "I don't believe in carbon".
Yes... Some Christians do go to those lengths, because denying literally all of science is required to deny some basic facts. In this case, to "disprove" radio carbon dating, her response was that she didn't believe in atoms.
Is this the part where I kill myself?
As a Christian, yes that woman was very foolish
Speaking of Carbon do you know what Carbon 14 is used for?
The ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 is used to carbon date organic matter, such as plants and animals.
Carbon dating can be verified by using dendrochronology.
It does have some limitations. For example it can't be used reliably to date:
Materials that have been exposed to radioactive sources.
Marine organisms.
Materials over 100,000 years old.
Trees or materials that have been exposed to high concentrations of carbon dioxide emissions produced by burning fossil fuels.
I'm a Christian and that book is stupid
So much so that I'm not even going to comment on it. We will see who ends up in heaven and who doesn't, right? Jesus Christ is Lord. Glory be to God the Father, God the Son and the Holy Spirit!
omg a sane chrisitan, must be fake, omg blah blah!!1!1!!111
+tom tomson I think you'll find most Christians would chastise this book. It is utter bull crap.
+tom tomson
Yeah that book is completely retarded
What book is Stupid?
As a Swede I would slam the door in their face.
samma här :)
Håller med.
Fy fan vad hjärntvättade amerikaner är for real...
I only understand TROLLHAMMEREN
What if he was muslim?
You know what's more important than Ferraris? Nawledge.
+Matt Acker hahaha
Hell nawledge.
+Matt Acker Closely followed by Wishdom.
That genius jacylnglenn should stop throwing bullshit around and make a response for "muslim vs atheist 2" she got owned with that video
+Rust Cohle
how about the "genius" Rust Cohle learns to spell correctly?
Me: I don’t believe in god
Christian: Why don’t you believe in god?
Me: Because there’s no proof
Christian: The bible is proof that god exists
Me: If the Bible is proof that god exists than a comic book is proof that Spider-Man exists
Everyone around me: ohhhhhhhhh
STUPID ATHEIST QUESTIONS PART 2: ruclips.net/video/B1Rhcs7UV9E/видео.html
+JaclynGlenn You should do a video on the rapes that occurred in Germany during New Year's and how they are suspected to be the incoming Syrian refugees. Or do a video on the current ongoing refugee crisis and your current stance on it.
+JaclynGlenn just asking if you don't believe in god do you have to be an atheist? cuz i'm not big on religion. sorry if this sounds dumb it's just a lot of people say that every one who doesn't believe in god is an atheist and i have never been apart of religion and i have always doubted gods life cuz to me the bible is a fiction with no logic, i mean who the hell is going to believe that women came from a males rib?
+coollolkid on youtube I DO. So, you think the Holy Bible is a "fiction and no logic". I'll tell you why. Because you have no fear and no trust in God. That's your biggest mistake. And yes, a person without belief/faith in God/Jesus Christ is an Atheist and is a HELL BOUND PIECE OF SHIT.
Smith99 wow some one just got butt hurt easily, if you hate Atheists that much then why are you on an Atheist channel? is your life that sad that you WANT to be butt hurt?
+coollolkid on youtube
Being a theist is not the same as believing the Bible. Being an atheist doesn't mean you're part of a religion now or were in the past. Here is what the terms literally mean:
Theist - You believe in the existence of God or Gods.
Atheist - You do not believe in the existence of God or Gods.
The important thing to know is that these are merely belief structures a person has. The categories can be broken up further when we talk about what person claims to know. Gnosticism comes from the Greek meaning "Having knowledge". So someone who is agnostic, does not claim to have knowledge "Without knowledge". So you are left with 4 categories:
Gnostic Theist
Agnostic Theist
Agnostic Atheist
Gnostic Atheist
The later still relates to their belief while the former relates to their claimed knowledge for that belief.
Since knowledge is not a subjective matter, at least one of these categories has to be wrong. Frankly, it seems like both gnostic groups are overstepping because if they truly had knowledge it would be testable and observable. To say "I know" is to state a claim while "I believe" only states personal belief.
This is the summary of religious views. If I continue we'll start talking about burden of proof... (The answer is that any gnostic person has it).
Oh! And in answer to the question "How many crucifixions does it take to kill Jesus?"
The answer is....
42.
I see what you did there! 👍🏼
69
21
***** Oh my 😂😂😂👍
+Jesse Colton If I may refer to the Gospel according to Richard Adams, it didn't really much matter as it happened far in advance of the completion of the calculation program, and the ultimate solution involved nobody getting nailed to anything...
The ONLY question religion can't answer is "Which religion is the right religion?"
So, according to you, Christianity is the right religion? What about Hindu, Islam, Buddhism, or other religion? Are you saying they are all wrong? What about the fact that Jesus wasn't the first deity in history to be born in December, to a virgin mother, died, and was resurrected. Jesus was just a copy from other deities that came before him. Truth hurts.
he wasn't even born in December
Here are a few less "Christian" comments from Jesus:
* Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children according to Old
Testament law. Mark.7:9-13 "Whoever curses father or mother shall die" (Mark 7:10 NAB)* Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before eating. He defends
himself by attacking them for not killing disobedient children according to the
commandment: “He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.” (Matthew 15:4-7)Not very "loving" eh?
According to you, all other religions were originated from fallen angels? Formed from evil. Gotcha.
Actually all other religions were created by men in an attempt to subjugate the people.
“How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop?” Let’s find out 1. 2, 3, *chomp*
“How many crusafixtions does it take to kill Jesus Let’s find out: 1, 2, 3 *dead*
Dorel Macaragiu you know I’ve never been persecuted since I believed in God.
Dorel Macaragiu honestly, I don’t even take time to even read to understand the Bible. I just read it and question it. I’ve been questioning the Bible since high school.
I'm glad that I'm not the only one that thought of that commercial 😂
I feel like if God wore underwear, he would wear a thong.
***** What makes you think that?
+Lion Gang what's wrong with my comment? :(
It would be a G-O-D string
+64imma I think you are mistaken - I'm pretty sure God wore Boxer Shorts on weekdays and a Pouch on week ends (because he would be partying!)
Banana hammock!
it takes one crucifixion to kill Jesus... because he was just a guy... he died, that's it.
HAUNTED HOUSE you can’t say he didn’t exist. Odds are, Jesus did exist but probably as a normal guy that ended up being hated by the Romans. Plus there is some evidence that Jesus the person existed
The crucifixion didn't kill Jesus. A man with a spear did.
HAUNTED HOUSE how do you know he had a grave? If he was crucified then he may not have been given one.
Vegard Skjerdal the man with a spear pierced him to check if he was dead
What's the difference between "jesus" and a picture of "jesus?" A picture only needs one nail.
Faulty logic 😂😂😂 who gave them permission to use the word logic 😂😂😂😂
Wowow what they think atheist would ask this?!?!
And they have no responses against these okay dude 😂😂😂
+pyro light no we really don't believe you guys would ask this. this is joel osteen shit, like the Christianity that most look at as the cop out. I'll get in debates and discussions with atheists because, honestly, it's fun. NO atheist asks any of this that I've delt with yet.
Trouble is almost no one in the States uses the word 'logic' appropriately. They typically mean 'sensible' or 'rational' and often simply 'appears correct.' Robust debate has given way to idiotic comments sections.
+None17555 There is no logic to your logic.
Sometimes I worry that logic is a buzzword
poor jesus had really bad internet took him 3 days to re-spawned. Should have asked mummy and daddy for better internet
Thats probably rhe dumbest thing ive read innnnn my life
It's a bit funny though
i mean he is his own dad there should be no problem
@@AlisonPerfater r/woooosh
It takes 666 crucifixions to kill Jesus (I'm Catholic but honestly I couldn't resist making this joke)
I'm actually the crucifixion the blood of just, subscribe.
ayyy good one m8
Jesus Christ is my lord and savior
Jesus needed 3 days to respawn. What a laaaaaag!
+HASH SLINGING SLASHER take a good hard look at your profile pic
I'm an Atheist who has asked religious people some of those questions (including some of the "stupid" ones)... And I know the answers. I'm not asking because I don't know. I'm asking to make them think about those, and assuming they reach my answer, have them in turn question their religion's claims. Most of the time, when I do that, religious people change the topic by making a new assertion, to which I retort with a more closely related question that I also know the answer to. That said, if this book really doesn't have answers, then I'd highly recommend Christians buy it, and read through. The theist vs. atheist discourse could use some fresh arguments.
+Nick “Bilal” Gordon troooooooooll
+Nick “Bilal” Gordon Knock Knock
well said fam👏💯
same here, when I ask them questions they dont have answer to they change the subject
Random Internet Profile I make fun of the logic (or lack thereof), not "them". Like if someone throws at me the Omnis, I might throw out a question that, yes, in its very formulation shows having all the Omnis is just impossible even in theory, let alone be real... But the point is to dispute the Omnis, not make fun of the person believing them.
For example, "Why would an all loving god create diseases and 'natural' disasters?" or "If god is all knowing and all powerful and has a plan, what's the point of praying or otherwise 'talking' to him? He already knows what you want before you started praying, and will execute his plan regardless. And it's not like your prayer is giving him strength, since he is all powerful... right?".
As long as a believer mentions "god's love" or something like that, I think he's "qualified" to receive questions like the above.
+boenrobot We will never know if a God does exist or not. We will never know if he certainly does have powers of if he just creates negative impacts for human experience. We're just no smart enough.
"How did the animals exercise on the ark"?
That is a good question. The ark presumably would not have much room to do so. Animals need exercise or they will get lethargic. Also, the ark better have been well ventilated or you would probably suffocate from animal stink.
Run the fuckers around all the edges of the boat by chasing after them with a clockwork lion or some such shit. If you've got a boat as big as the ark, then you'll get a couple of miles out of doing a few laps.
even a more fitting question is: "how the hell did you fed those animals?" i can understand a couple hamsters, but a couple elephants? and the lions and tigers? i bet the antelopes were shitting themselves :P
Duhhh!! Noah used capacious extremis (the undetectable extension charm)
+Person McPerson If he could put that much time and effort into that why didn't he spend time fixing the human race instead of committing genocide.
+Person McPerson Well in the great great words of
Dr House "If you could reason with religious people there wouldn't be religious people" This was a very nice and peaceful chat and I thank you for that, but I don't see this going any where. At least for a Christian you pretty open minded.
I'm a Christian, but I still believe in science
You are as rare as hen's teeth.
1. Evolution is just a consequence of the way God made His creation.
2. There is no contradiction between God/Jesus and science.
3. Science is just incapable to prove (conceive/comprehend) God.
4. Atheists are forgetting that the Bible was written to be understandable even for the people from those old times.
5. Most atheists are not believing in God/Jesus to not have restricted the satisfaction of their addictions etc.
6. If all people would follow the wisdom from God/Jesus then we would have no more crimes, useless suffering, injustice and generally evil things between people.
7. Those who have harmed people (in any way, not only through wars) did not have faith in God (it is not enough to put a "label" on a "product" to be that thing, the 'content' is what makes the difference ... ).
8. Any bad human being (who hurts innocent people and even himself) is NOT following the wisdom from God/Jesus, but the "evil forces" instead.
9. That is why people need mainly free better education for all to decrease stupidity, respectively all the bad things, which is what God/Jesus wants.
10. "Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect." Matthew 5, 48
Yeah..... selective science
Would you mind if I ask you a quick question about Christianity please??
@@filmeseverinchristians are not really christians they are actually agnostic. Morrals from the bible are old and outdated, christians have no grip on reality, however i do agree what sciance and god could work together, but scieance has disprooven the bible nonstop
If you could reason with a christian, there would be no religion.
Mark Bernie Burns What a lie.
Mark Bernie Burns Lol you told the quote wrong.
Sir Usopp may I burn in hell for that.
Mark Bernie Burns The way you told it doesn't even make any Sense. Reasoning with a Christian does not end religion. There are thousands of other religions out there. The quote is actually, " if you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people.
I stand corrected. I'm truly glad you are wrong re thousands of religions. I couldn't give a Flying Spaghetti Monster about the benign religions. Islam is the elephant in the room.
Jaclynn you look really pretty. Did you add like red to your hair at all
+marshall brooks yes! Thanks for noticing :)
+JaclynGlenn For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are on their way to Destruction, but it is the Power of God to those who are being Saved. Jackie you will have no excuse on Judgement day, your rude awakening is Coming.
pls no hatters Yeah you will look like your profile pic on Judgment day.
HAY! BUTTER STEP OFF MII GAL M8! ILL GIVE YA BUTT AH KICKIN!
+Sola Scriptura Get a grip kid and educate your self.
I would not trust a book of questions that the writer can't answer themselves. 2 + 2 =
more like 1001 sarcastic questions atheists have for christians. heh
more like a really shit reply
I don't know why they argue so much. Religion is literally just something that we made up
EdgY
Jesus wouldn't support a Ferrari, he builds hotrods.
Hi Uncle Al
Jesus Built My Hotrod
Jesus stroked my hotrod...
God is a Chrysler man. 'And he drove them out of the garden of eden in his FURY. Clearly god had a Plymouth. Probably had a hemi, too.
+Vi 3 You seem to be the only one who understands the reference.
Does god fart? Oh yeah, that's how we get thunder.
Floyd Dameron every time he eat taco bell is a thunderstorm.
And the purest shit award goes to...
Floyd Dameron: I thought he was bowling.
Floyd Dameron No, that is how we got you!
You probably didn't learn the science at school
It's funny when Christians make fun of Scientology. It's like they actually think their stories are more realistic
why would anyone even need to own this book?
+Kain Motthasmews To make fun of it.
true
Must have been an atheist company that published it. This cannot be real.
+Kain Motthasmews So that the author and the publisher get rich at the expense of people who can't find anything better to do with their money, what else? It's just like giving money to churches that preach Prosperity Theology.
+Kain Motthasmews
For laughs?
Why did God, who is "not the author of confusion" write such a confusing book?
Walt F. God did not wrote the Bible. If you’re going to question/criticize something, please thoroughly understand it first. It was written by humans.
Serve and protect My food But it was inspired by him. But fine, if god knows that humans make mistakes all the time, why did he trust others to write the Bible for him instead of writing it himself? If it ended up being a confusing book, then he should had instructed better or written it himself.
Pooh that’s a good question
@@sirenenoire4091 but christians claim God wrote it and that the Bible is infallible
I am an atheist but if God was proven real: I will not worship him and will become a Satanist. God killed thousands and Satan only killed ten, I also stand for individualism and not a blind sheep. (I know this is a late comment)
i say fuck em both, id worship none of em. satan and god are both egotistical douches, and satan is an idiotic one at that cos he punishes the people that his arch nemesis wants to be punished? wtf is that logic? rofl
but im with you, i definitely wouldn't worship any of these monotheistic monstrosities even if presented with proof.
H¥pΣr N¤vα well said
I would too!!!! I wanna chill in the Underworld lol
I like this woman, beautiful, smart and an atheist. What more could you ask for?
funny?
If you don't think she's funny that's your loss.
no lol I was saying you could add funny to that list. I think she is hilarious haha
Not feminist
For her to like you back and not be mean, but that's about it.
I haven't researched it, but I'm guessing this book is more of a trojan horse book. It seems like this book is designed to make Christians think about all of the idiotic things in the Bible. I think the book is kind of a brilliant piss-take.
I hope you're right.
“Christian”: Wait! Where are you going Mr. Athiest? You’re supposed to ask me stupid questions!
Athiest: *walking away*
One thing that bothers me about Christianity is that, if there's a God, he must be a bit of a prick, because he made all kinds of stars and planets, but gave us no way to visit them. What's the point?
We can visit them. Just not yet. Maybe in the future
I hope your right.Thanks for the encouragement.
+Jared Shope Exactly but just with The help of science that The cristians doesn't like. God should have made us able to visit the stars without having to study and in The end see that The whole religion is bullshit
Umm, what reason. is there to visit them? Literally every planet we sent probes to have nothing but rock, acidic gas, and maybe a little frozen acidic water. Like, there's literally nowhere else to go.
You seem to forget about the exoplanets around other stars. Apparently, there are plenty of exoplanets, some of which might happen to have life.
i feel like Christians wouldn't need a book to help them argue if they truly believed in what they believe.
This book makes atheists out to be simple-minded children. Not that I'm insulting kids- technically, and legally, I'm still one myself.
Don't take that as an excuse to try to indoctrinate me if you're an over-zealous thiest, by the way. I've been an atheist since I was eight. Couldn't debate much, mind you, but I was very sure of myself, and I still am. I am way past the point of no return, and proud. Not all my peers support this, but I could care less.
+Elizabeth King i want to ask you one thing so mathematically you can't create anything
out of 0 that's mean nothing comes from nothing so where we come from
and how come the universe come to exist ? please answer i need to know
+Karim Hilali Well, a god can't just appear either, can they? I think it's probable that there was a universe before our own, and that provided the tiny building blocks for this universe. When I say tiny, I'm talking about molecules and atoms. It's a lot more logical to think that atoms- something small but possibly quite reactive, could come from nothing anyways, as that could go on to react with other atoms, eventually creating molecules, and molecules would go on to form the elements in the periodic table and therefore the right conditions for life on Earth.
What I'm saying is nobody knows how the universe started. But that doesn't mean theism is any more legit. Where would the energy for a god even come from? My argument here is basically that it makes more sense to go from zero to tiny and invisible to the naked eye (atom) than it is to go from zero to all-powerful being, or at least a being powerful enough to create the foundations of this planet.
YASSS girl, u do u. Don't care bout what others think. Just know, I support u. 😊👍
Lexxie Rayy Thanks! :D
***** You failed so hard with this sentence not me hhhhhhh i never said 1 i said 0 and 0-0=0 and 0+0=0 SO mathematically you can't create anything out of 0
I had two Danish Mormons knocking at my door a few years ago. I found this really funny that there were people from all the way across the Atlantic Ocean coming in eastern Canada to try and convert Canadians to Mormonism. What? Aren't we good enough to have the original American Mormons come and convert us? They were really nice though. Super sweet guys.
Some of these questions would be asked if you are trying to get details of their belief to reveal problems with them.
+Thomas Bridgewater Indeed. I could see myself asking those questions. It just depends on what claims or comments the theist has made.
Certainly those questions on their own make no sense, but the author, I would accuse, intentionally left the context out to make Atheists look foolish.
yep, I was thinking exactly the same thing.
+Thomas Bridgewater And the book doesn't have any answers. I don't see the point of this book, if there aren't any answers discussed to help the Christians defend their religion against these very problematic stupid questions. A book for atheists is likely to provide facts and references to defend your position as an atheist.
I feel like you missed the point. We often ask creationists things about the canon to their literature in order to show them that their book is full of inconsistencies between itself, reality, and logic. We don't believe angels exist but we may still ask what Christians believe about them.
+SS4Inferno Not to say many of the early ones were not blatantly stupid, but in the middle there you started focusing on questions we could actually ask to bring the inconsistencies in their world-view to light by their own words.
+SS4Inferno
I completely agree.
Though, based on the questions that actually were stupid, the person who wrote the book wouldn't be able to respond if an atheist asked those.
+SS4Inferno The point is that they called these questions "stupid" when some of them are actually waiting for them to answer. They kinda describe them as stupid to have an excuse not to asnswer to them....
Actually... In the creation myth, it never says that the snake was Satan.
well in genesis no but the Bible does call Satan the ancient serpent" in Revelation 12:9, 20:2, so I think that is where most people get the idea from.
Right, another stupid illogical twisting of the words of an ancient book with no meaning.
Actually, it is because of paradise lost
It also never says anywhere that Satan rules Hell. I hate how they "believe in the bible" but they twist things around so much in a book that has little to no relevance in today's society.
I have no questions for Christians, or any other whatever-they-are's. I just want them to LEAVE ME ALONE. Please, just leave me alone.
The difference between a religious person and an atheist is their epistemological and ontological standpoints.
+actionmethod The difference between a religious person and an atheist person is that one believes in God and the other does not.
+AGiantPie technically it's that one believes in any sort of theism (religion) and one does not.
+Jackity Yax semantics
.
+muy bien Are you anti semantic? ;-)
If birds evolved to fly then EXPLAIN PENGUINS!
Penguins lived in the antarctic climate, there was no need for them to fly and they had better chance of finding food in the water. They adapted i.e. they evolved to suit their environment.
***** And thus I have deducted that the internet doesn't know what a joke is.
spencer Don't worry, dude. A majority of people are so stupid it's hard to even tell when someone is making a joke.
***** oh ok
The doctor. adapting
I worship Stan
EDIT : Satay Sauce
Same
I’ve seen this book at the library. It’s one of those books you pick up and just facepalm and reconsider mankind’s intelligence 😂
I have a smart atheist question or two, that no theist has ever been able to answer.
1) Why did the gods make humans apes?
2) Why are the gods hiding from us?
1) Because he wanted too
2) They aren't hiding you just aren't seeing.
That was a pathetic question really. Asking a christian that would be like me asking you: "If you haven't seen the big bang then why do you believe in it." The only difference is God actually exists with proof while the big bang is just a theory someone made based on observations.
I usually simply ask them to prove God exists.
In response they say something along the lines of, "The universe is so amazing, complex, and unlikely, that there *must* have been someone that created it!"
I then explain to them how that is not actual evidence. I also ask them, hypothetically, if the universe was created by someone, how do they know it was the Christian God and not some other deity from another religion, or one that no one has even heard of.
They usually don't respond at that point. If they do respond they usually tell me how I am going to Hell and they are done arguing.
+Chelsea Kate The big bang theory is supported with scientific evidence, while there is no evidence of God's existence.
You claim that there is evidence of God's existence. Could you provide that evidence?
+Chelsea Kate Gravity is technically a theory. Try float off into space.
Also to answer to your answers to your questions:
1) Because evolution, while God isn't real.
2) You can't see something that does exist, also you answer makes no sense. That's like me saying "This is a comment, but you're not seeing a comment."
+Bryan smarties what you see is temporary and what you don't see is Eternal .
I am an atheist and I raised my daughter to believe in Santa but not God.
The answer I get from most Christians in response to the problem of evil is "Free will to sin".
Wait this is a legit question if god loves everyone who believes in him what about back when there were slaves that believed in him
If you meant the slaves in Egypt, then God freed them
They'll just reply with that shitty line
'its all apart of Gods plan"
@@damnbro2899 what about the ones who lives their whole lives slaves
There are a lot of questions here that might be asked in the right context, especially to make a rhetorical point, or to try to demonstrate a contradiction within a Christian's belief system.
And let's remember that not every atheist is a bastion of intellect, reason, and skepticism, so yes, some questions from some atheists can be quite stupid.
Like what questions are you talking about?
Even the very first one, "if there was no such thing as science, wouldn't Christians still think the Earth was flat?"
That is not a question every atheist would ask every Christian, but it might be something a particular atheist would ask a particular Christian who had expressed anti-science views.
The problem is that we have no context for these questions, and they might very well have made sense in context. For all we know, the author just trolled (the fishing term) RUclips and Reddit for questions atheists asked in the middle of a discussion.
The next one is "if God created people in his own image, what about black people?" and Jaclyn acts like "no one would ever ask this! This is absurd." Well, actually, if Christians believe that God made man in his image, then asking why are there so many different looking people could be used to question an apparent contradiction between their beliefs and reality, even if the phrasing of that particular question wasn't the greatest, I think that's the point they were trying to make.
Hopefully that gets my point across.
I personally like the neanderthal question. Christians have no rational response to this.
How about, "Did Adam & Eve have belly buttons?" If they did, why?
Notice, no reply from bible-thumpers.
jaclyn, you didn't get it; these are things atheists would ask as a rhetoric against Christianity, because they think Christianity's answer's are illogical.
they're actually the exact kind of questions you ask on your channels - the only difference is that you follow with an answer
Lol, exactly. Like, she seriously didn't seem to understand or get it.
LMAO... "cats have nine lives... I don't know how many jesus has..."
69 crucifixions and Adam and Steve had more fun
; )
The fact that there aren't even any answers is weird. A couple of these questions are valid.
It's actually pretty sad that we still have to argue about whether magical sky people exist.
They don't
actually the question of "why aren't we built to survive in water rather than land?" is actually a good question for christians. It's essentially, "why can we only survive on the small amount of the earth and not all of it if god created it for us?" like "why would god make all the other planets if we cant live on them?"
Oh dear ! Why are so many people deluded and in need an imaginary" big brother"? It's about time for humanity to wake up and deal with reality.
No no, some of those questions could be asked by atheists, but only in an arguementative or debate sense. However they'd be rhetorical in nature.
+Sophisticated Dinosaur Yeah, I kept thinking that throughout the video. Like, the last question is just a way of asking "how do you know your religion is the right one out of all of them?" It might be stupidly worded, but the underlying intent of the question is legit. The "Why is the story of the Bible any truer than the Lord of the Rings?" is again a legit question used in the context of debate. Such questions don't mean the asker actually thinks the Bible is truer than the Lord of the Rings. I don't understand how Jaclyn can't see this. :/
+05r13539
I was thinking it with the ark question. IF you are debating someone who believes in the ark, asking logistical questions to show how it can't possibly work is valid.
+Gerbil Jim
I'm sure you've studied history at some point in time. History is a branch of knowledge written by EYE-Witness testimony. You don't have Napoleon fight at the Battle of Waterloo every semester in your history class to evidently see that Napoleon did actually fight at the Battle of Waterloo. No, historic events are written by eye-witnesses who saw the event take place and record it afterwards. So how do you determine if a text is historically reliable or not? you have have some key tests. I have certain tests but please come up with your own if you don't like mine.
1) internal consistency
-are there contradictions in the text that point to massive confusion on the part of the authors? the gospels have tremendous internal consistency/harmony
2) literary style
-is it "once upon a time.." No, the gospels record that this specific time, place, with this people around Jesus said this/did that/went there. the literary style is not fairy-tale or mythology. but historical narrative.
3) archaeological evidence
are we talking about the island of Atlantis out in the ocean where no of us can verify? The Bible emphasis locations such as Bethlehem, Nazareth, Jerusalem, Rome, which are all archaeological verifiable places.
4) manuscript evidence
The new testament gospels today are based on over 5,200 Greek manuscripts all agreeing to an infinitesimal degree. There is no document in history that can approach the new testament gospels in manuscript evidence.
^^ Hahaha, get a load of this guy.
Gerbil Jim
I thought I was clearing up the doubt that people had about the historicity of the Bible.
I've literally just watch the most ironic advert that's been put on one of your videos. it was a salvation army advert trying to prove that Jesus was really god..... I just can't, like an atheist video getting an advert for Jesus is just fucking hilarious 😂😂😂
Yeah, same. They forgot one thing though. What if Jesus NEVER EXISTED?
+Alyssa Hoffman that's exactly what I though, they could of said what If he was just a made up character to make Christianity look better in the new testement because the old testement had a "few" problems... *cough* genocide, rape, slavery, women are nothing but servers to men *cough* *cough*
+sdfweadfwefdw The only historical references are from the Bible
+sdfweadfwefdw I was debating whether or not to post that comment because I couldn't remember if that was actually accurate so thanks for clearing that up smile face
+sdfweadfwefdw These roman historians were born after jesus died right? if so then their accounts of him existing didn't come from them, they would of been told that he existed, they never actually saw the so called Jesus.
I love talking with Christians. They give me an insight of how people must have been before the Renaissance Period happens. You know, when people were basically just brainwashed and didn’t have the ability to ask “why”.
This sounds really satirical... I hope it's satirical.
Her answer to the questions are not satirical if that's what you're asking however I think the book might be satirical
Yeah, I meant the book
it could be a troll book
+TheSkypeConverser I'm pretty sure the book is a troll. Take a look at this companion book by the same author, and read the blurb on it: www.goodreads.com/book/show/27222472-1001-questions-god-won-t-answer-for-christians
They wear MAGIC underwear according to the Mormons.
What?
I think it is ok to ask questions about religion, but what I have noticed in the comments is that no one respects anyone that disagrees with them and this fact is so sad why can’t we have a discussion (not an argument) and act like adults, ask questions because we want to know and not because we want to prove someone wrong.
for example: I am a christian and I get asked questions like this all the time(I know weird right), but what they forget is to ask me what I believe they just assume that every christian thinks the same but in fact that is not true, I personally believe there is a god but I don’t believe in the bible because god did not write it.
Well I just wanted to say that please respect others opinions and don’t try to push someone down because they don’t think the same as you, but rather you should try to learn from others beliefs and stories:)
My father owns a store and he's an atheist (as am I). He always puts out those "guess how many" jars things. I'm going to see if he'll put out a paper on a jar full of mini crosses that says "How many crucifixions does it take to *actually* kill Jesus? " 😂
I wish these people would actually interview atheists when they write this crap...
I want to ask these ridiculous questions (specifying that it was from this book), just to see what they would say.