Is Lab-Grown Meat The Answer To Our Meat Eating Problems?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 июн 2024
  • Is Lab-Grown Meat The Answer To Our Meat Eating Problems?
    Gene Editing & CRISPR: How Far Should We Go?
    • Gene Editing & CRISPR:...
    SUBSCRIBE so you never miss a video! bit.ly/3tNKzhV
    And follow us on Instagram and Twitter
    / abovethenoi…
    / atn_pbs
    *What is lab-grown meat and how is it made?*
    Instead of growing the entire animal, lab-grown meat allows you to only grow what you're going to eat, and that happens with cells. You grab some cells from the animal through a tissue biopsy, and then you can isolate and separate out the specific cells that you want. Then, you immerse those cells in a nutrient broth and that gives them all the nourishment that they need to grow and survive. And they’re housed in what’s called the bioreactor. The bioreactor controls all of the environmental conditions to facilitate and promote their growth. So as the cells grow in the bioreactor, they get to larger and larger numbers, and you can achieve almost an infinite number of cells from this process. Then, you separate the cells from the broth and form into a 3D shape that looks similar to a cut of meat, and that is what you eat on your plate.
    *What’s the point of growing meat in a lab*
    We have a meat problem. We raise BILLIONS of animals every year, and for many of them, the conditions are pretty terrible. AND the whole process is a big contributor to climate change in 3 big ways. Number 1 is land use and carbon dioxide.The earth’s surface is mostly water, and only a fraction of the land can be used to grow food. And most of THAT land is either grazing land for animals or land used to grow food to FEED the animals. We’re actually cutting down forests to make MORE space so we can eat MORE meat. And that’s a problem, because trees capture CO2, which you probably know is a BIG contributor to climate change. So, the more we eat meat, the fewer trees grow, and more CO2 escapes into the atmosphere.
    Number 2 is fresh water. Raising animals for meat takes a LOT of fresh water - and that’s a finite resource. That means we can run out. Pound-for-pound, raising meat takes a lot more water to grow than a non-meat source of protein like soy.
    Number 3 is greenhouse gasses coming from the animals themselves. They’re constantly emitting carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, both of which contribute to climate change. Cattle are the WORST, because, well, cow burps! Each year, a single cow will belch about 220 pounds of methane, which doesn’t stay in the atmosphere as long as CO2, but is WAY WORSE when it comes to warming the atmosphere.
    SOURCES
    6 Pressing Questions About Beef and Climate Change, Answered
    www.wri.org/insights/6-pressi...
    Breakdown of global land use today
    ourworldindata.org/land-use#
    Fact check: How bad is eating meat for the climate?
    www.dw.com/en/fact-check-is-e...
    Cultivated meat: Out of the lab, into the frying pan
    www.mckinsey.com/industries/a...
    Per capita red meat and poultry consumption
    www.ers.usda.gov/data-product....
    Beef: The “King” of the Big Water Footprints
    www.watercalculator.org/news/...
    Cows and climate change
    www.ucdavis.edu/food/news/mak...
    About KQED
    KQED serves the people of Northern California with a public-supported alternative to commercial media. An NPR and PBS member station based in San Francisco, KQED is home to one of the most listened-to public radio stations in the nation, one of the highest-rated public television services, and an award-winning education program helping students and educators thrive in 21st-century classrooms.
    Funding for KQED’s education services is provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the Koret Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the AT&T Foundation, the Crescent Porter Hale Foundation, the Silver Giving Foundation, Campaign 21 donors, and members of KQED.
    CHAPTERS
    0:00 Intro
    0:56 How Lab-Grown Meat Is Made
    3:27 Cooking Lab-Grown Chicken
    4:04 The State Of Lab-Grown Meat
    4:47 How Traditional Meat Hurts The Environment
    7:22 Lab-Grown Meat Isn't Perfect

Комментарии • 96

  • @AboveTheNoise
    @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +6

    Would you eat lab-grown meat? Why or why not? Let us know in the comments below!

    • @ZentaBon
      @ZentaBon Год назад +2

      I would. ESPECIALLY if it was made to the same price or only slightly higher as the same amount of industrial farmed meat. I'd pick the one that is not having suffering as part of the way they are grown.

  • @brandongillette6463
    @brandongillette6463 Год назад +36

    One thing you could make clearer is that vat meat is not a meat substitute. It's meat. It looks and tastes like chicken because it IS chicken. It's the same stuff a chicken's body produces via the laws of nature, it's just that the lab uses those same laws of nature to make the stuff without the rest of the chicken.

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +10

      Yup. It is real meat!

    • @pixelfairy
      @pixelfairy Год назад +2

      It's not everything yet. I don't think they're making connective tissue or bone marrow. But they could.

  • @juliegolick
    @juliegolick Год назад +25

    Though not a big consideration for most people, my understanding is that lab-grown meat will not only be kosher, but also not count as "meat" for the purpose of the laws of kashrut (kosher food). Finally, we Jews will be able to enjoy cheeseburgers! 😆

    • @KillerMZE
      @KillerMZE Год назад +2

      You can do it now if you take a literal reading of the bible. Cows aren't goats, and it's batel beshishim that the milk comes from its own mother

    • @juliegolick
      @juliegolick Год назад +2

      @@KillerMZE Sure, but lab-grown meat will allow you to enjoy cheeseburgers even if you *don't* follow a literal reading! Hurray!

    • @normal4810
      @normal4810 Год назад

      What about vegan cheese?

    • @GoodnessGracious...
      @GoodnessGracious... 9 месяцев назад

      So... you're excited about the ability to partake in "sin" without the technicality? ....very weird

    • @juliegolick
      @juliegolick 9 месяцев назад

      @@GoodnessGracious... I say this with love (and as one of them), Jews are the ultimate rules lawyers. It's the exact same mentality that lets my mother-in-law serve a table full of baked desserts at Passover, since they're all made with almond flour, potato starch, etc., even though they taste exactly like normal baked goods. It's part of the culture lol.

  • @safaiaryu12
    @safaiaryu12 Год назад +27

    Super interesting! I would absolutely eat lab grown meat. I'm in a similar position where I love eating meat, but hate the animal cruelty in the industry. I actually tried to give up red meat recently and within like three months, I was anemic... sigh. It's tough. Lab grown meat could be an awesome alternative.

  • @SenoritaConejita
    @SenoritaConejita Год назад +7

    I'm vegan and adopted a vegan lifestyle because of the cruel animal industry and negative effects on the planet (as pointed out in this video, thank you!). While I do miss some meat (pepperoni pizza!), I don't think I'll be jumping on the lab grown meat, as the smell and texture of meat grosses me out now. But I think this is great for getting folks to transition to a more sustainable and less resource draining diet! Plus, the surplus of soy and other plant based alternatives will hopefully bring about new "mock" meats (seitan is currently my favorite, and you can make it absolutely protein rich!).

  • @frederickoftheartic2209
    @frederickoftheartic2209 Год назад +10

    I don't care if it's lab grown or not, all I care is if they can make lab grown bones too.

    • @fl260
      @fl260 Год назад

      Joueur du Grenier fan?

    • @pixelfairy
      @pixelfairy Год назад

      At least the marrow

  • @Garbimba1900
    @Garbimba1900 Год назад +11

    Yes, I'd love to eat lab grown meat. Very good analysis, guys!! You spoke about the energy needs which is something not many have touched on!

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +1

      Thanks for watching! And the feedback.

  • @badgerspecialtycoatingscon3485
    @badgerspecialtycoatingscon3485 Год назад +5

    220 lbs of meat per person, per year. That's 2-1/2 quarter pounders a day.
    Just curious: Does that statistic take into account the population number of people who do not eat meat and extract that from the total population number?

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +2

      Yup. It's the total U.S. meat consumption for the entire year, divided by the total U.S. population.

  • @tipoima
    @tipoima Год назад +2

    I can't imagine that these bioreactors would be less efficient than a bunch of animals who constantly need to walk around, digest things, and grow various non-meat things.
    Although I am a bit concerned if lab meat would have the same nutrition as normal meat. I wouldn't want to buy a meat equivalent of a watermelon because the manufacturer wanted to save money on growth liquid.

    • @randomprotag9329
      @randomprotag9329 11 месяцев назад

      it would be different even with care taken. needing to supplement the final product means its going to be difficult from the animal eating in the feed.

    • @randomprotag9329
      @randomprotag9329 11 месяцев назад

      bioreactors are more efficient with input and output pure from feed to meat produced but more costly plus often the inefficiency is over estimated as more than meat are produced so it might actually be more efficient once all the useful products are factored in.

  • @ltleflrt
    @ltleflrt Год назад +3

    I'm excited to try it!

  • @studentofsmith
    @studentofsmith Год назад +2

    I would eat lab grown meat even if it was a little more expensive provided it tasted okay.

  • @ForumArcade
    @ForumArcade Год назад +4

    Artificial meat production will use orders of magnitude less land and water, which will be crucial resources as time goes on, especially since much of the cattle industry in the US is located in the Midwest and relies on groundwater resources for irrigation.
    The real resource bottleneck is energy. Right now the energy costs are very high, but the outlook is good that those costs will decrease with time.
    Combine the resource considerations with the more favourable ethics, and I think it's inevitable that lab grown meat will become the de facto source of consumer meat products in the developed world at some point in the future. But there will be a significant amount of resistance to overcome, even after the energy problem is resolved. Even now special interest groups are lobbying on behalf of the big cattle ranchers to stop artificial meat from being sold as "meat", or sold at all if they can help it.

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +1

      Well said!

    • @pixelfairy
      @pixelfairy Год назад

      They can call pseudo meat. If it's nutritious, tastes good, and costs less, it will sell. I'd like to see a future where meat is either vat grown or grass pastured. Such purists would do better without the cafo farms anyway.

  • @thomasr.jackson2940
    @thomasr.jackson2940 Год назад +4

    More good stuff. I am open, but unenthused, about it. Maybe the industry will change my mind. But like most things, at best it is a component. We shouldn’t lose site of farming as Expod describes in his comment. Larger scale but non-industrial farming is possible. It might not be a global solution to hunger, but neither is vat meat. We should welcome the innovations, but also look for lower tech, non industrial, sustainable solutions that are deployable around the world, not just shiny toys of tech companies.

  • @HaarmannE
    @HaarmannE Год назад +3

    8:50 Easy, Theres going to be thousands of livestock feedlots around the country not being used. build the tanks there, add a single wind turbine and some solar panels.

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +1

      I don't know if it's that simple!

    • @HaarmannE
      @HaarmannE Год назад

      @@AboveTheNoise well they dont have much else to fix... already have water figured out, they're all already in the right spots to have access to rail infrastructure. So many people are going to be needing jobs when we cut back on meat, might as well bring the jobs to those people whom are losing them. instead of keeping this a silicon valley thing

  • @flinops
    @flinops Год назад +3

    Man, I'd love to try it! Probably will be expensive once it hit the stores tho...

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +1

      Prices are coming down!

    • @flinops
      @flinops Год назад

      @@AboveTheNoise yes, that's true :) I also switched to vegetarian meat options since meat in austria is soo expensive haha

  • @GymGirl88
    @GymGirl88 Год назад +2

    I don't eat beef, but you can pry chicken out of my cold dead hands 😅. Though I'm down for lab chicken

  • @wander-0014
    @wander-0014 Год назад +1

    Personally, I'm interested in seeing if the practice itself could be replicated at home on some star trek food printer type stuff, Maybe with a sort of commercially available version of a bio-reactor made for in home use and the bio-media being sold in vials for personal or commercial use.
    my Only real problem is the Nutritional broth itself, I kind of wonder if their are any other formula's for it that could be used as an option for the Bio-reactor and where one could get their hands on information .

  • @anakimluke
    @anakimluke Год назад +2

    Thanks for the video! Though I wish you had gone over two points you only barely mentioned: 1. Even assuming labmean always uses fetal bovine serum, how/how much death and suffering is it compared to traditional meat production? 2. Comparison on energy consumption and CO2 emissions from labmeat and traditional meat production?

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад

      We did bring up the issues of fetal bovine serum and energy consumption in the video.

    • @anakimluke
      @anakimluke Год назад +1

      @@AboveTheNoise yep. like I said, you just touched it, didn't show any numbers ;)

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад

      @@anakimluke We found it VERY hard to get specific numbers, 1 because a lot of this data is proprietary and companies don't hand it out and 2 it's hard to do an apples-to-apples comparison because there is no global, up-and-running lab-grown meat industry yet.

  • @OnionBun
    @OnionBun Год назад +3

    yeah im cool with lab meat. even if it costs a bit more.

  • @CL-rw7cd
    @CL-rw7cd 8 месяцев назад

    Is it safe, is there any side affects later down the line and how can you tell the difference

  • @Ceelvain
    @Ceelvain Год назад

    6:38 Are those cows releasing a rap album soon?
    Because, they look so. 😂

  • @scarletletter4900
    @scarletletter4900 Год назад

    I'm hoping that the tech makes this protein source cheaper and more accessible to people who need it most.

  • @hazz3313
    @hazz3313 Год назад +2

    I would definitely eat it but my concern right now is about the zero immune system of this meat (saw it on another video, don't know if is true though).
    Could you please tell us what you felt was different when tasting it ?

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +3

      Thanks for watching! As for your question about the immune system: that's why lab-grown meat has to have a sterile lab environment, kinda like in surgery, to prevent any bacteria or viruses.
      As for the taste - the main difference was mostly texture, but chicken doesn't have a strong flavor, to begin with.

  • @rosimunoz6752
    @rosimunoz6752 Год назад

    I absolutely would eat lab-grown meat-as long as it didn’t use FBS and wasn’t more environmentally harmful than regular animal meat. Lab meat may not taste exactly the same as the real thing, but that’s ok. I’ve barely consumed any cows milk in years (lactose intolerant) and at this point, almond milk tastes like regular milk to me because I’m used to it. They’re different, but serve the same purpose and taste good, so ultimately it’s fine. My hope is that as a society we’ll get to the same place with meat.

  • @kyokoyumi
    @kyokoyumi Год назад +2

    As a carnivore, I'm excited about this since I can get more food for cheaper and eat easier in the long run (hopefully, at least. I'm really hoping this type of meat will be infinitely cheaper).
    I've been waiting for years for cultured meat to go to market.
    For power, they could always use nuclear reactors lol
    I feel like your chicken test was a little biased since you went there and watched him cook it and ate it, knowing exactly what it was. I feel like if you'd gone in blind, you would've said something different. Your brain is primed to know it's not real meat so your brain is going to make sure it doesn't taste like real meat.

  • @sesvinyes
    @sesvinyes Год назад

    Very interesting video, but the fact that you still need to impregnate cows to make the nutrient soup potentially keeps animal suffering and cow burps in this loop :( I would like to see more on that or whether there are other alternatives.
    Thanks for the informative video!

  • @JakacBatko
    @JakacBatko Год назад

    You know... it's like smoking. What is the "most safe and most healthy way to smoke"? Vapers, Tobacco, Pipes, ...
    IT'S NO SMOKING. Eat less meat and the problem is solved. But yea, it's hard to go out of your way. I understand that it's hard to put the effort into changing your life.

  • @claudeflorentine2223
    @claudeflorentine2223 11 месяцев назад

    Would I eat lab grown meat? 100%. In a heartbeat. No problem. Bring it on. We need it. Earth needs it.

  • @amymiller4438
    @amymiller4438 Год назад +1

    This is so cool. 🐔

  • @shadymaru309
    @shadymaru309 Год назад

    I can't wait to try lab-grown meat. I'm confident the obstacles around fetal blood (eesh) and heavy power needs can be surmounted, and while I am a dedicated carnivore, I agree that I'd really rather not have the guilt about something dying for my dinner if we can achieve that.
    I'll bet lab-grown pork makes *amazing* sausage. Just sayin'.

  • @Imperiused
    @Imperiused Год назад

    1:37 After my own heart!

  • @royceheflin8207
    @royceheflin8207 Год назад +1

    I would always buy cultivated meat over "traditional" meat so long as it is damaging the environment less.

  • @dlsspy
    @dlsspy Год назад +1

    Mad scientist meat vs. murder meat. Anyone in marketing hiring?

  • @infiniteworfare5089
    @infiniteworfare5089 Год назад

    can you get some people to try a carnivore diet on lab grown meat only. i eat meat cause of the health benefits. not the taste. i tried plant based diet and had horrible depression and anxiety

  • @flymypg
    @flymypg Год назад

    My bet is still on genetically engineered plants that, when combined, provide all the key proteins needed to provide a very close match to meat flavor and texture, despite the bulk of the other protein being regular plant proteins. Growing meat cells still seems terribly inefficient by comparison.

    • @pixelfairy
      @pixelfairy Год назад

      That's what Impossible Foods does. They've been on the market for years now.

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +1

      There is also "hybrid meat" that takes some meat cells and plant cells and combines them. Trying to get the best of both worlds, I guess!

  • @nathan98000
    @nathan98000 Год назад

    I’d be interested to see you review Fossil Future by Alex Epstein

  • @nirui.o
    @nirui.o Год назад

    Why meat? I mean, humans can always create different food from different materials. In China we have many meat alternative foods made of soybeans etc for hundreds of years (Toufu is one of them), and it tastes nothing like meat, but still delicious in it's own way. Maybe the ultimate meat alternative is ... not meat?

    • @AboveTheNoise
      @AboveTheNoise  Год назад +1

      Yeah I think it's just one more option for people that, hopefully, combined with other meat alternatives, will help out our planet a bit more!

  • @randomprotag9329
    @randomprotag9329 11 месяцев назад

    lab meat is not looking like a viable substitue is most if not all areas. for nutrition it relys on supplements with out an herbivore digestive system. for taste and texture it relys on making and combining different cells and will taste different as how the same animal is fed effect tastes. unless major improvements that would get someone rich just from it happen it be too expenive for actual use and will be a noverty for rich people

  • @beachboardfan9544
    @beachboardfan9544 Год назад +1

    Sophia is cute af!!!

  • @FIVESTARPOKEMON
    @FIVESTARPOKEMON Год назад

    Have you Eaten Lab Grown Meat in 2023? You May Be Entitled To Compensation!😂

  • @sk8rdman
    @sk8rdman Год назад +2

    For me, the whole "killing animals" angle is the least compelling argument for why we should be pursuing meat alternatives. Obviously we should have standards for the ethical treatment of livestock, but I have no moral qualms about killing another creature for food. People have to eat just as much as any other predator. We shouldn't feel guilty about eating the foods that we evolved to eat, even if that means other creatures have to die. It's the circle of life.
    However, I absolutely agree that we need to take responsibility for our impact on the environment, and I see how our reliance on meat is an unnecessary contributor to climate change, and not sustainable into the distant future. There's a lot that we can and should do to minimize the negative impacts of the meat market, and synthetic meats like these might be a step in the right direction.

  • @jamesweed8510
    @jamesweed8510 Год назад

    Will human now be on the menu um just asking for a cannibal friend

  • @fl260
    @fl260 Год назад +6

    I have 10 chickens. I give them grains and bugs and they give me eggs and fertilizer in return. The fertilizer fills the soil with awesome nutrients. I can then grow delicious vegetables and give all the veggies scraps to my chickens, who will give me even more eggs in return.
    ALL OF THAT did not require a giant factory that needs mining all kinds of metals and an overwhelming energy input to operate at base level. It just required nature.
    I say nature is the solution for the damages our big industries have inflicted to nature. Another big industry is by far the stupidest solution to solve problems brought by big industries.

    • @Mivychi
      @Mivychi Год назад +1

      Nature, as it turns out, can be in really short supply. Considering population concentration in cities, a good percentage of people live in places without enough resources for raising chickens and growing vegetables. Other people do but have other issues, like contaminated groundwater (from fracking, GenX, etc.).
      Raising your own chickens and growing your own vegetables is not a great solution. It’s nice that you can manage it but simply is not scalable.

    • @NoirKirbi
      @NoirKirbi Год назад +3

      Everyone having a small farm for all their needs from animals would definetly be optimal, but it's almost impossible to achieve in our current world. Already most people are living in tight cities in flats, and that number will inevitably increase with how rapidly our numbers grow. Even right now having some space for a farm is something very few can have. While there will definetly be problems, they will be far less dangerous compared to what will happen if we let the current meat industry continue to snowball its harmful effects to continue feeding the always multiplying amounts of mouths

    • @brandongillette6463
      @brandongillette6463 Год назад +1

      That's not viable on a planet with 8 billion people, most of them in cities. If you replaced all the large-scale agriculture with small-scale agriculture, most people would starve. We don't have the systems we have now because we just woke up one day and decided it would be fun. They are solutions to real problems that unfortunately create different problems. Industrial agriculture has made food scarcity a thing of the past, but at the cost of environmental degradation and cruelty. We have to fix those problems but the challenge is doing so without bringing back food scarcity.

    • @fl260
      @fl260 Год назад

      @@NoirKirbi You start from a false premise of "everyone needs to have a farm". That is a LIE. You need to travel a little and stop spreading lies.

    • @NoirKirbi
      @NoirKirbi Год назад +3

      @@fl260 Okay then what even was your point? You said "nature is the solution to all the damages our big industries have inflicted to nature". What are you implying we do here if not everyone having a little farm in a comment where you are in such detail describing how you have a little farm and praising it as a solution to all our problems? You are literally contradicting yourself, or are you implying we need to grow chickens and use their waste as fertilizers and feed them with scraps of vegetables but on a bigger scale to feed everyone? Sounds awfuly familiar to the agriculture industry causing all the problems right now doesn't it? Just so you know i'm not trying to twist your words for the sake of the argument, but i genuinely do not understand what message you are trying to convey

  • @user-qh7ms9dl4u
    @user-qh7ms9dl4u 4 месяца назад

    No no

  • @marshallwilliams8136
    @marshallwilliams8136 Год назад

    So like bull to me

  • @PrimozZ1738
    @PrimozZ1738 Год назад

    Booooooooo

  • @HenryVBestKingEver
    @HenryVBestKingEver Год назад

    processed