GiganticWebsites.com is a project through which I make it possible for people to build truly gigantic websites (thousands of articles each!) at ridiculously low prices. If you have a great domain you want to turn into an amazing website or an existing site you'd like to upgrade/scale, visit our website or check out the One Minute Economics presentation video below: ruclips.net/video/gE8yEOQFMvo/видео.html Please note that this comment is not an ad for a third-party service provider. GiganticWebsites.com is my baby 100% and I will personally be involved in each and every project so as to ensure the website turns out great :)
Really happy you like the video and when it comes to education systems, even those in developed nations, it's important to understand that it's very difficult for them to keep up with technology. This is primarily because status quo edu systems grow linearly, whereas technology oftentimes grows exponentially. To put it differently, it's difficult for something designed to grow linearly to keep up with something that grows exponentially :)
That would make me really happy. Unfortunately, the likelihood of that happening is very, very low. Always hard for an education channel to compete with entertainment content :(
I just found your channel and am currently binging all your videos. I absolutely LOVE your content and can't thank you enough for taking the time to make them. You put broad concepts into simple terms. Do you have a venmo account by chance? I don't have PayPal because I don't agree with their principles, but I'd love to donate!
When you say 'weather', how do you quantify that? I get that there would be temperature, but people seem to talk as though things that aren't variable quantities correlate, like facts and events.
One Minute Economics needs your help! Please give me a minute (heh) of your time by watching the following video if you find the channel useful, literally anyone can help (either financially or by spreading the word about my work): ruclips.net/video/io04ckq1X1M/видео.html
I often find this is misused to make the argument that correlation implies no causation. People simply state correlation does not imply causation and think it wins the argument.
Thousands of people have died suddenly and unexpectedly hours to days after warp speed injections from the same fatal conditions such as blood clots, heart attacks, and blood platelet failure. Doctors have confirmed many of these deaths to warp speed. Also, many warp speed recipients have died suddenly and unexpectedly but their deaths have not been ruled on by medical examiner. Can one infer that warp speed killed them? Or would it be better to say “Correlation does not imply causation.”?
not the best example as its not really clear that weather should / could affect homicides . a more clear example could be age and arm length which of course correlate due to growth
How many is 'many times'? Inexact statements like that can also lead to false conclusions. Such as is 30 many times? 30 out of 10,000 is not many at all when in the context of 10,000 samples. 30 out of 40 is. Context means a lot.
That's not how logic works. "A implies B" means that if A is true, B is ALWAYS true. "A does not imply B" means that it is *possible* that A is true and B is false, not that A being true means that B must be false. In other words: Correlation simply cannot be an argument for causation
GiganticWebsites.com is a project through which I make it possible for people to build truly gigantic websites (thousands of articles each!) at ridiculously low prices. If you have a great domain you want to turn into an amazing website or an existing site you'd like to upgrade/scale, visit our website or check out the One Minute Economics presentation video below:
ruclips.net/video/gE8yEOQFMvo/видео.html
Please note that this comment is not an ad for a third-party service provider. GiganticWebsites.com is my baby 100% and I will personally be involved in each and every project so as to ensure the website turns out great :)
Awesome! don't get why professors can't explain it so simple and clear
Really happy you like the video and when it comes to education systems, even those in developed nations, it's important to understand that it's very difficult for them to keep up with technology. This is primarily because status quo edu systems grow linearly, whereas technology oftentimes grows exponentially. To put it differently, it's difficult for something designed to grow linearly to keep up with something that grows exponentially :)
Faaaacts!!!
These are so great. You're one of my favorite RUclipsrs out there.
Really appreciate the support and nice comments, reading them always makes my day! :)
That would make me really happy. Unfortunately, the likelihood of that happening is very, very low. Always hard for an education channel to compete with entertainment content :(
My happiness is positively correlated with seeing new videos from this channel in my sub. box!
... and my happiness is positively correlated with comments like yours, thanks a ton!
Hahaha! But didn't we just learned that correlation does not imply causation? lol
I just found your channel and am currently binging all your videos. I absolutely LOVE your content and can't thank you enough for taking the time to make them. You put broad concepts into simple terms.
Do you have a venmo account by chance? I don't have PayPal because I don't agree with their principles, but I'd love to donate!
You can buy his books, and I believe he has a Patreon too
Beautifully explained. Wow
Thank you so much Abhishek for the positivity you bring to the community, hard to express in words how much that means to me!
When you say 'weather', how do you quantify that? I get that there would be temperature, but people seem to talk as though things that aren't variable quantities correlate, like facts and events.
One Minute Economics needs your help! Please give me a minute (heh) of your time by watching the following video if you find the channel useful, literally anyone can help (either financially or by spreading the word about my work): ruclips.net/video/io04ckq1X1M/видео.html
Are you saying people were more likely to kill someone if the weather was nice?
Bro you change my view to the world
Really happy to see my channel is genuinely helping people, makes all the hard work well worth it!
The correlation is people fighting over ice cream to the death when it's hot out.
:))
this video should autoplay before and after nutrition science YT videos
As someone who did a fair bit of nutrition-related research himself, let's just say I'm glad you pointed this out :)
Short and to the point!
Really happy you liked it, thank you :)
I often find this is misused to make the argument that correlation implies no causation. People simply state correlation does not imply causation and think it wins the argument.
Perfect!
Thousands of people have died suddenly and unexpectedly hours to days after warp speed injections from the same fatal conditions such as blood clots, heart attacks, and blood platelet failure. Doctors have confirmed many of these deaths to warp speed. Also, many warp speed recipients have died suddenly and unexpectedly but their deaths have not been ruled on by medical examiner. Can one infer that warp speed killed them? Or would it be better to say “Correlation does not imply causation.”?
WTF are you talking about? lol
Thank you!!
Thank YOU for taking the time to say something nice :)
Had to literally text this video to one of my friends
Hope he found it useful, thanks for spreading the word about my work! :)
I feel marriage counselors should use this
:)
Weather is a corolation
Your example just made me laugh
:D
not the best example as its not really clear that weather should / could affect homicides .
a more clear example could be age and arm length which of course correlate due to growth
reminds me of "poverty is the underlying cause of crime".. easy to debunk but yet people (especially academics) love to push that narrative.
Yeah me and my crush.... Thinking i m getting it but no she asked me to stop hoping lol
Well... she did say there IS a chance, just that it's one in a million :P
@@OneMinuteEconomics you dint have to roast me both the sides 😢😂
IT EXPLAINED MY IGNORANCE
:)
Tell this to the Trumpies who blame Biden entirely for the high gas prices
When it comes to energy policy mistakes, it's safe to say that pretty much everyone is to blame :(
The phrase should be *"Correlation does not ALWAYS imply causation."* There are many times that it does.
How many is 'many times'? Inexact statements like that can also lead to false conclusions. Such as is 30 many times? 30 out of 10,000 is not many at all when in the context of 10,000 samples. 30 out of 40 is. Context means a lot.
That's not how logic works. "A implies B" means that if A is true, B is ALWAYS true. "A does not imply B" means that it is *possible* that A is true and B is false, not that A being true means that B must be false. In other words: Correlation simply cannot be an argument for causation
No it never does. It does not IMPLY causation ever.
What about my climate change?
im only 5 seconds in and- is this gru? so gru got a youtube channel and no one bothered to tell me? rude.
:))