What is Diplomatic Immunity?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 сен 2017
- Learn why diplomats, consuls, and others get special immunity.
Follow us on social media:
Twitter: / occamanswers
Facebook: / occams-answers-1609580...
Reddit: / occamsanswers
------------------------------------------
The basic idea of diplomatic immunity is that foreign diplomats are afforded protection from prosecution should they break a law of the country in which they are working. While this is often depicted as a “get out of jail free” card, the reality is that diplomatic immunity, like every aspect of law, is nuanced and grounded in centuries of legal tradition. Very soon after neighboring civilizations began sending messengers to negotiate trade and mitigate conflict, it became clear that these envoys were only effective if they were not killed or imprisoned upon arrival. Thus a tradition of special privileges and protections for foreign messengers, representatives, and diplomats emerged, and was codified in the legal writings of many civilizations, including ancient India, Egypt, Greece, and Rome. This idea grew and spread during the Renaissance, and in 1815 the Congress of Vienna produced the first modern international treaty concerning the rights of diplomats. This framework was further codified in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations in 1961 and the related Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in 1963, which have been ratified by nearly every nation and serve as the basis for modern diplomatic law.
The United States, which closely follows the framework laid out by the Vienna Conventions, recognizes three different types of foreign representatives: diplomats, who represent their home government in international negotiations, consuls, who represent the citizens of their home nation and are often employed by embassies, and members of international organizations such as the United Nations. Diplomats are the most heavily protected group: they cannot be detained, arrested, or prosecuted for any crime, law enforcement officers cannot enter their residence, they cannot be summoned as a witness in a court case, and their immediate family enjoys these same privileges. Consuls are less heavily protected: they can be detained in the case of a serious felony, their private residence (but not their office space) can be entered using the appropriate legal procedures, and their family members are not afforded extra protections. Members of international organizations can be treated as diplomats or consuls depending on their position. Within each category, staff employed by the foreign representative enjoy varying degrees of extra protection depending on their job duties.
If a foreign representative does in fact commit a serious crime, the host country is not without recourse. The first step is to contact the representative’s home country and request that their diplomatic immunity be waived. If the home country agrees, the host country can arrest and prosecute the representative. Otherwise, the host country can have the representative declared a persona non grata, that is, a person unwelcome in the country, revoke the representative’s visa, and have the representative recalled to their home country. Often, the representative will face criminal charges in their home country after being recalled.
Even with these safeguards, diplomatic immunity is sometimes abused. Since its inception, diplomatic immunity has been used as a defense by diplomats or their family members against charges of domestic abuse, drug smuggling, assault, and very rarely, more serious charges of murder and terrorism. The vast majority of diplomatic immunity abuse comes in much less dire forms, like unpaid rent and parking tickets.
While diplomatic immunity is not a perfect system, a world without it would fare much worse. Representatives could then be suddenly detained as political prisoners, used as pawns in international negotiations, or imprisoned due to ignorance of the local customs or a conflict between local laws and their home country’s laws and values. Dangerous international incidents would be commonplace in such a world, as representatives fail to complete their missions as envoys, negotiators, and ambassadors. As such, diplomatic immunity remains an essential aspect of international diplomacy.
Am happy that they can't attack someone with diplomatic immunity
Thank youuuuu! I really needed this.
Explained it well, thank you!
That awesome. I didn't know about these. Thank you.
thank you soooooo much for this !!!!!
This explanation is so good I understand everything about this 👍👍
Thanks I have a law exam tomorrow and I needed this
Thanks for the information
that was really nice. thanks!
Omg thank uuuu i was preping up for a MUN and this helped a lot
This job does such! Why do I always get picked?
Soo cute animations 😂😆
Love it
cool
billie eilish lovely
Should be completely abolished in today's world, in fact the opposite should be in place. Diplomats should be experts in the laws of foreign lands they wish diplomacy with, so much so they should be made examples of with impunity when breaking those laws , certainly NOT immunity!
consuls are but apparently diplomats are high ranking individuals including politicians.
One thing that confuses me. What would happen if a police attack, threatened, arrest or killed someone with diplomatic immunity? Would they lose their job and go to jail?
I think doing so counts as an act of war. The sending country will be able to reciprocate the act of war as they see fit, the won't be bound by rules which say you can't start a war but can respond to acts of it.
The best ever part of someone with diplomatic immunity is, the laws that can not touch them are also forbidden to AIDE them and PROTECT them either. The door does swing both ways equally. So in a nutshell if I were ever assaulted by someone with diplomatic immunity I would as a non political affiliated person end their game once and for all. Who needs a cop when they are not allowed to interfere anyway. Justified homicide.
Am happy that they can't attack someone with diplomatic immunity