If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇 ► ruclips.net/user/rakcroybrosgaming More EPIC cinematic convoy and tank battles 👇 ► ruclips.net/video/bUgaOuxmUms/видео.html
Well the T-72 actually has Composite Armor and the M60A3 has none, it's a bad idea to use them in a Frontal engagement like this. The M60s in the hull down position and with clear lines of sight at a distance; the T-72s might have been in trouble as the Royal Ordinance L7 family of guns is no joke with the later model APDSFS rounds. Even the M774 round (which is not even the best 105mm Sabot round) can defeat the upper Glasis on a T-72A without going for weak spots from 2000m away.
Epic duel between M-60s & T-72s in a Middle Eastern scenario! Known Middle Eastern countries with M-60s: Iran & Israel Known Middle Eastern countries with T-72s: Iraq & Syria Known Middle East wars where M-60s & T-72s clashed head to head: 1) Iran-Iraq War between Iranian M-60s vs. Iraqi T-72s 2) 1982 Lebanon War between Israeli M-60s vs. Syrian T-72s My recommendation for next vid: Do a clash between groups of M-41 Walker Bulldogs vs. T-54 in jungle scenario (to implicate Vietnam War between North & South Vietnam)
Survive T-72s Survive swarms of infantry with these goddamn RPGs Survive T-80s Get your turret stuck by burst from Shilka. Spend rest of battle trying to stay out of sight.
Т 72 пушка 125 мм, автомат заряжания,композитная броня со лба башни и корпуса,что в переводе на гомогенную броню лоб башни 400-500 мм ,лоб корпуса 300 мм!по бокам фальш борта, двигатель многотопливный 840 ЛС..он в каждой позиции на голову круче м 60!!т 72 и был создан для борьбы с м 60,а вот Абрамс был создан для борьбы с т 72,но уже тогда был создан и 80!!!
Ты забыл про модернизированные российские т-72! Т-72 б2(2012 год), Пушка 125 мм, лоб корпуса 500 мм, лоб башни 500-600 мм, он лучше чем обычный т72 во всем, и это не говоря о т-72 б3 , которые лучше американских танков.
@@arty5876 Т-72Б2, он же Рогатка, создан в 2016, но в серию не вошел, во всем лучше Т72Б3, хоть 2011, хоть 2016, ведь те создавались на его базе путем "экономии".
Согласен! Опять аццкий высер западофилов! Комбинированная броня Т-72го (не ниже 450мм) во лбу корпуса. Против гомогенной брони М-60 лишенного какой либо комбинированной защиты (стойкость корпуса - менее 320мм.) ))))))
could we use the next variant to show if upgrades make a difference also what about a cold war duel with most common vehicles located there in a fixed time frame
Klaus Von Tasse I was just saying that Americans can fight without arty or air support. And if we can’t win, then we win anyway. So many people seem to think that using artillery is a pussy move. If I can’t win a brawl then it’s time to pull out the brass knuckles.
The T-72ural has the standard cast armor, T-72A has a quartz insert on it's turret and textolite (it's like a fiberglass) on the UFP, the T-72B and later models use the Soviet style chobham NERA.
@ANUSH SLAVEIKOV Then how did USMC M60s destroy many T-72s in Iraq and then why is the 105mm gun still used in so many vehicles and Tanks if it can't penetrate even older T-72s? You should look at the penetration values of modern 105mm APFSDS rounds. They can penetrate T-72s.
@ANUSH SLAVEIKOV The best APFSDS for the 105mm gun is the M 900 and it can penetrate 600mm of RHA at maximum. That would be enough for T-72Bs with contakt 1 , if it can penetrate T-72Bs with contact 5? That I don't know.
@@swedenneutral7892 The Marines used em...they didnt get Abrams for awhile after that! Sorry but fact checking is a must here before you post anything...dip shit!!
@@TheTolz0 lol those t72s used by Iraq were export versions with no upgrades, the current standardised Russian army t72 variant will put up a tough fight to a m1
@@r.p5380 Its an overstatement. Iraq used the T-72M and was far from being a initial soviet T-72's with no upgrades. They where formidable tanks, but vs the M1A1, it was a simple case of, they cant pen the M1A1, the M1A1 can pen them, frontally. One must remember that The M1A1 was specifically made to counter T-72 tanks, but one must also remember today, that tanks like the T-72B3 is more then capable of defeating an older variant of Abrams as well.
Hello ! Please, could you also make a scenario with 100 Soviet T-34-86 attacking 1 Abrams M1A2 (also having an opportunity to move) ? Initial distance - 400 m. It may look really fun. But please, make a bigger distance between to Soviet tanks. Thank you.
@@kedrsoundlight2508 if what Kedr says is correct, then I don't see why this isn't a fair comparison. OPs logic would work in a Gulf War comparison, as the best tanks fielded by Iraq were export T-72's which were at best comparable to original T-72M1's from circa 1979 - compared to M1A1HA's from 1989. However, if these T-72's in the video are only T-72A spec and the M60's in use are indeed A3's, then the comparison is a lot more relevant. Of course, it would be nice to know what spec these T-72's actually are just to make sure that it is indeed fair.
I am a Marine M60a1 crew man. We out ranged and see far more 1st round hits than the T-72. And reactive armor has 0 effect on the long rod penatrators.
big mike modified m 60s with good crews againts exported obselite t 72 that have there best features removed from th with no support and tye worst crew in the woruld of course m 60 is gonna win dickhead
This could be the Iran-Iraq War. In 1981 during the Battle of Dezful the Iranians lost 150 M60 and Chieftain tanks with the Iraqis losing just 40 tanks, mostly T-55 and T-62 with few T-72 loses. A year earlier Iran also lost numerous Chieftains against zero T-72 loses in a battle near Qasr-e Shirin. Chieftains did particularly badly because it had an unreliable engine and was doubly so in hot and sandy conditions where the engine struggle to cool itself. It was only useful in static defense. The M60 was more mobile but still greatly inferior to the T-72 which had superior power to weight ratio as well as range. The Iranians lost many M60s due to them getting stuck in the sand and not able to pull themselves out or just running out of fuel and getting overrun before they could be refueled. The reliability and mobility of the T-72 earned it a great reputation as the king of the desert. This was partly the reason the T-72 was greatly feared by reporters in the 1991 Gulf War. But their success against 2nd generation tanks like the Chieftain and M60 obscured the reality that these early 1970s tanks were no match against 3rd generation tanks like the M1 Abrams. In fact Iraqi T-72 was much inferior even to upgraded M60A3s. They were in no way comparable to the latest Soviet T-72B but even these would have been overmatched by M1A2HA that spearheaded the invasion.
This outcome is not surprising at all. The M60 predates the T72 and the M60 was a mediocre tank since its inception. The armour is not great, the tank is massive, and it took a long time to get a proper stabiliser. The engine was also a huge gas guzzler and the tank wasn’t even that fast. I think the only thing it really had going for it was the M68 105mm gun AKA the L7 105mm because it was still a pretty good gun at this time period. The T72 on the otherhand was a great tank, lower profile, auto loader, actual stabiliser from the start, much better armour than the Patton, fantastic gun.
The T-72 is a more modern tank. The M60 with the L7 has a better gun. All things considered, this is probably accurate. The T-64 and 72 were the motivations for creating the Abrams tank. The M-60 was the last evolution of the Sherman.
So I will try to look at this when they were used in combat against each other and true combat, And the syrians actually were on the defensive so they were at the one actually dug in
In this scenario I would expect the battle to be pretty even. The T-72 would have no trouble penetrating the weak armor of the M60 but the M60 wouldn't have much trouble either. The advantage for the M60 would be it's much faster fire rate, optics and fire control system. The T-72 would be much slower in detecting, tracking and firing on it's targets that the M60. The M60 was a stop gap tank but ended up being fielding for much longer than the US military entended. I realize that 99% of you have probably never even seen a real tank, much less know anything about them, so don't try and act like an expert. I read one stupid comment that said "since the T-72 can take out an Abrams it should easily destroy a M60" lol. First off the T-72 (even it's upgraded version) is no match for an Abrams and I'm pretty sure that no US Abrams has ever been destroyed by a T-72 but it's not from the lack of not trying lol. The T-72 is sorta like the Mig 29, they both are probably one of the worst pieces of modern military equipment ever made if you look at their combat record and how they have faired in battle.
I hate saying this because sadly it is true; the allies didn't learn proper tank building until well after the Korean war. But even in Vietnam the Armor of the United States was lacking and it shows. Most Russian vehicles forego comfort and crew safety for robust durability and reliability. Many American tanks until the last years of Vietnam may have had cutting edge technology; but the Russian tanks outclassed and outgunned American ranks again and again. That is the reason why tanks like the M1 were invented. Vietnam is the only conflict close to today's warfare where American and Russian tanks squared off with similar features but with results that didn't favor the U.S. Korea doesn't count because they didn't have half the features then tanks do now.
Out of the western tanks of the same era as the Soviet T-72M shown in the video (at least I think it's a T-72M), the American M60A3 shown in the video isn't the best choice to take on a T-72 head on. The British FV4201 Chieftain, specifically the Mk.11 model, would have been a better choice. It has a 120mm L11A5 gun instead of its predecessor, the 105mm L7 (which the M60 had; designated as M68), which allowed for firepower closer to the T-72M's 125mm 2A46M gun than the L7 would have given, which is also the Chieftain's greatest advantage over other western tanks. The Chieftain Mk.11's armor is better than the M60A3's armor, albeit not as good the T-72's. It's biggest downside to the Chieftain Mk.11 would be its speed in which it was notorious for being slow. It was the slowest of all the tanks of its era, but considering this would be a full frontal fight with no real flanking going on, that really shouldn't be much of a problem. I would actually like to see you do a video of the Chieftain Mk.11 facing off with the T-72M. That, and seeing the German Leopard 1 vs the French AMX-30.
Probably because War Thunder even on sim settings isn't remotely a tank sim. It doesn't model differences in optics quality/FCS/stabilization quality. At most it shows different zoom levels and a binary "has/doesn't have" choice for two-plane stabilization, but none of the actual vehicle specifics that set them apart. And for that matter it doesn't give vehicles era-appropriate ammunition either: it just gives them whatever is considered balanced in battle rank terms. That having been said, this video is of some Men of War mod (not Armored Warfare, as it is oddly tagged) which is even less realistic/more video gamey than War Thunder. Play an actual tank sim like Steel Beasts and you'll see the T-72A is pretty closely matched with the M60A3 TTS using M774, with advantage going to the A3 TTS w/M774 at ranges past 1.5km, because of its superior 1st round hit capability (itself owed to the superior fire control system).
เรื่องจริง ๆ ปืน 105 มม.ของเอ็ม 60 เอ 3 ไม่สามารถเจาะเกราะ T.72 ได้ ในซีรี่ส์ เอ็ม.60 เหลือแต่รุ่น เอ็ม.60 เอ.2 MMG 152 ที่สามารถยิงจรวดโทว์ ออกจากปืนใหญ่ 152 มม.ได้เท่านั้น ที่เชื่อว่าพอรับมือกับ T.72 ได้ แต่เอ็ม.60 ก็หนักและอืดอาดเกินไป จึงไม่ใช่เรื่องง่ายที่เอ็ม.60 จะประมือกับ T.72 ได้ เอ็ม.60 ไม่มีระบบสลัดป้อมปืนทิ้ง เมื่อถูกยิงเพื่อช่วยสลายแรงระเบิด และความร้อนในตัวรถ Really, the 105 mm M60 A3 gun cannot penetrate the T.72 armor in the M 60 series, leaving only the M60A.2 MMG 152 model capable of launching the TOW rocket. Can only leave 152 mm cannon Who believe that when dealing with T.72 but M. 60 is too heavy and lingering Therefore it is not easy for M. 60 to be able to deal with T.72 M. 60 does not have a turret salad system. When shot to help break down the explosion And the heat in the car
All I would have to say is to this in 1982 when Israel used the M60 main battle tanks against syrian's t72s they wiped them out,, and the Israeli and tanks were actually outnumbered
Just a game not very realistic. The T 72 has a 125 mm smoothbore main gun that out ranged the M60 105 mm rifled main gun. Fire control may help the M60 plus crew training may give them the edge, but it is way out gunned! In reality the T72 would sit back out of range pounding the M60.
If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇
► ruclips.net/user/rakcroybrosgaming
More EPIC cinematic convoy and tank battles 👇
► ruclips.net/video/bUgaOuxmUms/видео.html
Looks like El Alamein 1942 with different tanks
Yeah... Same...
Gulf War
El Alamein 2.0
The T-72 tanks were tough against the M60 Patton tanks.
There were no camels
Lol 😂 but true...
you don't want them there. They are super or uber charged. One can kill or annihilate 45-67 T-72, and no less than 80-90 Pattons/M60.
@@sergeyshchelkunov5762 😂😂😂😂
@@sergeyshchelkunov5762 dumb
Well the T-72 actually has Composite Armor and the M60A3 has none, it's a bad idea to use them in a Frontal engagement like this. The M60s in the hull down position and with clear lines of sight at a distance; the T-72s might have been in trouble as the Royal Ordinance L7 family of guns is no joke with the later model APDSFS rounds. Even the M774 round (which is not even the best 105mm Sabot round) can defeat the upper Glasis on a T-72A without going for weak spots from 2000m away.
nah I dont think it could pen the upper plate of a T72a
@@leopardcentury4079 With M774 shell it can penetrate the frontal armor of a T-72A, and with the even deadlier M833 it will slice through it
@@richieThach yeah maybe but I think it's still sooo outmatched by the 72, it's armor is so much better
+@@leopardcentury4079+ M774 has around 410mm of pen at 10m.
@@richieThach yep and if we include the M900 then it just slices through it like butter
00:39 tankman say:"F#ck this everything! I go home."
Lol 😂
Dude survived a fucking explosion next to him. I think he deserves to go home
Epic duel between M-60s & T-72s in a Middle Eastern scenario!
Known Middle Eastern countries with M-60s: Iran & Israel
Known Middle Eastern countries with T-72s: Iraq & Syria
Known Middle East wars where M-60s & T-72s clashed head to head:
1) Iran-Iraq War between Iranian M-60s vs. Iraqi T-72s
2) 1982 Lebanon War between Israeli M-60s vs. Syrian T-72s
My recommendation for next vid: Do a clash between groups of M-41 Walker Bulldogs vs. T-54 in jungle scenario (to implicate Vietnam War between North & South Vietnam)
Next time; Battle of 73 Easting!
Cmon im having Operation flashpoint flashbacks
Then try to make a better tank xD
Survive T-72s
Survive swarms of infantry with these goddamn RPGs
Survive T-80s
Get your turret stuck by burst from Shilka.
Spend rest of battle trying to stay out of sight.
@@kireta21 5 oclock enemy rpg soilder 50
*Thwoom*
*twhoom*
*bop pop pop*
*YOU ARE DEAD*
War is bad -barba bush beans 1987
"War is not nice" :D@@nikkity5491
M-60 is history!
If we talk about the T-72, is it automatically the "Ural"-version or something else?
Yeah. That's the most ubiquitous
Russia Tank modern vs American Tank modern
Nice idea
@@gabrieldossantos1147 thank you
elia nardi He already did That with M1A2s and T-90s
T-14 armata
@@m1a1abramstank49 yeah!
10 T-14 Armata VS 150 Shermans
MRpotatoe paringa that’s going to be a bloodbath
Yeah
Israeli HVMS Sherman, and let's see lol
Guys
Thanks :D
Armata will lose.. 100 Sherman ramming... 😁😁😁
Italian invasion of america?
@@Van-xf6vb ...😆
But who will they defecto to when they start losing
Soviet Invasion Of América ;D?
What gun they use to invade ?
Pizza ?
@@marderkpz7148 Yes the pizza is the best weapon in the world.
No surprise, the T-72 has a more modern fire control system and it's gun packs a great punch.
Unless the M60 was upgraded af course.
Т 72 пушка 125 мм, автомат заряжания,композитная броня со лба башни и корпуса,что в переводе на гомогенную броню лоб башни 400-500 мм ,лоб корпуса 300 мм!по бокам фальш борта, двигатель многотопливный 840 ЛС..он в каждой позиции на голову круче м 60!!т 72 и был создан для борьбы с м 60,а вот Абрамс был создан для борьбы с т 72,но уже тогда был создан и 80!!!
Ты забыл про модернизированные российские т-72! Т-72 б2(2012 год),
Пушка 125 мм, лоб корпуса 500 мм, лоб башни 500-600 мм, он лучше чем обычный т72 во всем, и это не говоря о т-72 б3 , которые лучше американских танков.
@@arty5876 Т-72Б2, он же Рогатка, создан в 2016, но в серию не вошел, во всем лучше Т72Б3, хоть 2011, хоть 2016, ведь те создавались на его базе путем "экономии".
Согласен! Опять аццкий высер западофилов! Комбинированная броня Т-72го (не ниже 450мм) во лбу корпуса. Против гомогенной брони М-60 лишенного какой либо комбинированной защиты (стойкость корпуса - менее 320мм.) ))))))
Russia: what to do now?
America: watching till the end... :(
RUSSIA: HURRAAAAA
Lets be honest here in a realistic engagement the t-72 would break down before it even got to the front line
@@gnomechild3248 absolutely right, because a lot of them mounted with the worse cannon and less armour protection
Same gun but worse ammo
@@fairulezuan5944 it was just a joke about Russia equipment breaking down, a stereotype.
@@OrbitingThunder They never learned how to create the new one but still used their own old ideology..
could we use the next variant to show if upgrades make a difference also what about a cold war duel with most common vehicles located there in a fixed time frame
Remember when the US lost a battle on the ground they will send tons of B-2s and A-10s
*No*
Fact , because they are cowards ...
Klaus Von Tasse nah we just are too lazy to kick your ass a second time. Russian mercs got wiped out by Green Berets. Hundreds were slaughtered.
Chiang Kai-shek
I have nothing to do with the Russians, I only said the truth
Klaus Von Tasse I was just saying that Americans can fight without arty or air support. And if we can’t win, then we win anyway. So many people seem to think that using artillery is a pussy move. If I can’t win a brawl then it’s time to pull out the brass knuckles.
US:Mission Failed will get em next time....
UK:Can we join in with the fun?Send in the IFV Scorpions!..
Tbh if the m60 had 120mm gun it would’ve more of chance against the t72
T-72 vs T-90, T-72 vs Leo, T-72 vs T-14 Armata, T-72 vs Leo 1
T-72: leave me alone...
Leopard 2. Not leopard 1 lol
All that killing over a camel???
FunFact: That was really happen. 1981, Persia.
T-72 changed alot and the most modern variant is the T-72 B3
Mod for the modern tanks?
T-72 is from Red Rising/Cold War mod. M60 is from game Call to Arms
ZTZ-99 vs Type-10 or K2 BP?
Dude, do you know what kind of armor the T-72 has? They must take the speed and bypass the enemy’s tanks, they are weak in the forehead
Their frontal armor is OK againts 105mm gun, but the lower glacis is a problem
The T-72ural has the standard cast armor, T-72A has a quartz insert on it's turret and textolite (it's like a fiberglass) on the UFP, the T-72B and later models use the Soviet style chobham NERA.
@@mrcs1037 The amour of T-72As and Ms stands no chance against the 105mm especially if the use M833 or M900
@ANUSH SLAVEIKOV Then how did USMC M60s destroy many T-72s in Iraq and then why is the 105mm gun still used in so many vehicles and Tanks if it can't penetrate even older T-72s? You should look at the penetration values of modern 105mm APFSDS rounds. They can penetrate T-72s.
@ANUSH SLAVEIKOV The best APFSDS for the 105mm gun is the M 900 and it can penetrate 600mm of RHA at maximum. That would be enough for T-72Bs with contakt 1 , if it can penetrate T-72Bs with contact 5? That I don't know.
T30 Vs tiger2 video
is2 Vs tiger2 video 👌
Glad its a game...Gulf war proved otherwise and it wasn't close!!
M60’s was not in Gulf war
@@swedenneutral7892 The Marines used em...they didnt get Abrams for awhile after that! Sorry but fact checking is a must here before you post anything...dip shit!!
@@TheTolz0 lol those t72s used by Iraq were export versions with no upgrades, the current standardised Russian army t72 variant will put up a tough fight to a m1
@@r.p5380 Its an overstatement. Iraq used the T-72M and was far from being a initial soviet T-72's with no upgrades. They where formidable tanks, but vs the M1A1, it was a simple case of, they cant pen the M1A1, the M1A1 can pen them, frontally. One must remember that The M1A1 was specifically made to counter T-72 tanks, but one must also remember today, that tanks like the T-72B3 is more then capable of defeating an older variant of Abrams as well.
next the italian tanks vs british tanks ?
The ranging and Observation system is not at the same level and it seemed that this game didn't include this difference at all
Have it
Hello ! Please, could you also make a scenario with 100 Soviet T-34-86 attacking 1 Abrams M1A2 (also having an opportunity to move) ? Initial distance - 400 m. It may look really fun. But please, make a bigger distance between to Soviet tanks. Thank you.
@Tran Van Luu No chance for AM1. It will be surrounded and destroyed from the back side. I tried it. However, about 65 T-34 will be destroyed.
Wow the tank was destroyed, but the crew members still alive
- Russian communicant soldier : General ! Sector "B" is under attack by the U.S !!!
- Russian general : NANI !?
105mm gun of M60 can penetrating T72 armor ?
Which versions of T72s were those? Soviet are almost as doubled in armor compared to M export versions that Soviet allies had.
T-72A
10 Bob Semple tanks vs 1 Sherman tank
Sherman win and all Bob Semples destroyed....orrrr Sherman destroyed and all Semples win or all win?
Um why do the tanks look like the ones from CtA?
PS:LOVE your vids!
Just M60 tank is from CtA. Thanks!
Np keep pumping out these AWESOME vids man.
500 T-72's vs 5 M1A2 Abrams.
not much of a surprise as the basic model patton was obsolete as a front line MBT by the late 60s...even with explosive reactive armor
It’s time we replace those M60’s with abrams tanks
The T-72s does stand a chance against the M60 Patton tanks. That could explain why the US should make a new tank that can go a match against them.
Abrams
@@moa1846 yes, I know that already. Felt like I don’t want to spoil a surprise.
Seems like a fair comparison. A 50s tank going against a 70s design 👌🏽 we get you’re Russian biased but damn not even trying to conceal it
First Galactic Empire why so salty mate? Just enjoy the video
on video we have M60A3 1978
@@kedrsoundlight2508 if what Kedr says is correct, then I don't see why this isn't a fair comparison.
OPs logic would work in a Gulf War comparison, as the best tanks fielded by Iraq were export T-72's which were at best comparable to original T-72M1's from circa 1979 - compared to M1A1HA's from 1989.
However, if these T-72's in the video are only T-72A spec and the M60's in use are indeed A3's, then the comparison is a lot more relevant. Of course, it would be nice to know what spec these T-72's actually are just to make sure that it is indeed fair.
@@AdotLOM is T72A 79.
@@kedrsoundlight2508 I believe it is, according to Wikipedia. Not the most detailed source I know, but they generally get the dates right
AS ALWAYS, YOU DA BEST!!!👍
I am a Marine M60a1 crew man. We out ranged and see far more 1st round hits than the T-72. And reactive armor has 0 effect on the long rod penatrators.
in desert storm m60a3 TTS with ERA was used, not m60 AOS like what is shown in video
Hey men, can u make MOWAS2 the Man in the High Castle scenario? I've seen the Germans use black T55 with Bundeswehr cross
USMC m60 rise passives and us army national guard m60a3 tts bested the t72 in gulf war 1.
big mike modified m 60s with good crews againts exported obselite t 72 that have there best features removed from th with no support and tye worst crew in the woruld of course m 60 is gonna win dickhead
Anush Mikael but have you won the spelling bee?
Better is compare Iraq-Iran war when Iraq older T-54/T-62 totally liquidate Iran M60.
* the statistics of the gulf war would like to have a talk with you *
What about statistics from Iraq-Iran war?
Aviation, thermal sights and Abrams with DU mesh vs T55s operated by the well known to us in performance arabs. Not impressed.
T72 back to the bussnius
Does RobZ Realism mod have these post ww2 tanks?
Not really
This could be the Iran-Iraq War. In 1981 during the Battle of Dezful the Iranians lost 150 M60 and Chieftain tanks with the Iraqis losing just 40 tanks, mostly T-55 and T-62 with few T-72 loses. A year earlier Iran also lost numerous Chieftains against zero T-72 loses in a battle near Qasr-e Shirin.
Chieftains did particularly badly because it had an unreliable engine and was doubly so in hot and sandy conditions where the engine struggle to cool itself. It was only useful in static defense. The M60 was more mobile but still greatly inferior to the T-72 which had superior power to weight ratio as well as range. The Iranians lost many M60s due to them getting stuck in the sand and not able to pull themselves out or just running out of fuel and getting overrun before they could be refueled.
The reliability and mobility of the T-72 earned it a great reputation as the king of the desert. This was partly the reason the T-72 was greatly feared by reporters in the 1991 Gulf War. But their success against 2nd generation tanks like the Chieftain and M60 obscured the reality that these early 1970s tanks were no match against 3rd generation tanks like the M1 Abrams. In fact Iraqi T-72 was much inferior even to upgraded M60A3s. They were in no way comparable to the latest Soviet T-72B but even these would have been overmatched by M1A2HA that spearheaded the invasion.
Did you combine robz and red rising mods?
Not really, only T-72A is from Red Rising. M60 and several other things are from Call to Arms game
Great work as usual. A big request is king tigers vs m103's !!!
a more equal match would be m60 vs t62/t55
Team 6 navy seal vs 30 terrorist in tactical warfare. Whats idea ?
Possibility
@@warfare11gaming try if possible in building ot city
This outcome is not surprising at all. The M60 predates the T72 and the M60 was a mediocre tank since its inception. The armour is not great, the tank is massive, and it took a long time to get a proper stabiliser. The engine was also a huge gas guzzler and the tank wasn’t even that fast. I think the only thing it really had going for it was the M68 105mm gun AKA the L7 105mm because it was still a pretty good gun at this time period.
The T72 on the otherhand was a great tank, lower profile, auto loader, actual stabiliser from the start, much better armour than the Patton, fantastic gun.
M60 similar with king tiger
In one old american ww 2 movie, they used pattons as king tigers 😀
T-72s were far superior to M60s at the hands of a good crew.Saying that as a huge fan of some American tanks.
mod?
The turret on m60 has never popped like that. Plenty of them have been killed it never happened once.
M60A1 vs T62, M60A3 vs T62M please
The T-72 is a more modern tank. The M60 with the L7 has a better gun. All things considered, this is probably accurate. The T-64 and 72 were the motivations for creating the Abrams tank. The M-60 was the last evolution of the Sherman.
How about this time.. it’s the M1 Abrams
This would probably been more like Saudi Arabia VS Iraq of some sort
So I will try to look at this when they were used in combat against each other and true combat,
And the syrians actually were on the defensive so they were at the one actually dug in
What robz has modern/cold war tanks
M60 Patton was aged as T-72 arrived. So compare with M1 Abrams.
Raj Pawar abrams was far to superior for its time
Yes but it helped aging M60 Patton to compete T-72.
yon kippur war (first Phase ) flashback 🇪🇬vs🇮🇱
Go M60 vs T55!!!
t55 again
MotoEnd I don’t know, seems like the M60 had a better gun with a better APFSDS and better optics
T-72 attacking S-Tank in hull down defense
This tanks seen combat against each other in Lebanon, Iran-Iraq and Kuwait wars
what game is that?
Men of War Assault Squad 2
@@warfare11gaming thanks
In this scenario I would expect the battle to be pretty even. The T-72 would have no trouble penetrating the weak armor of the M60 but the M60 wouldn't have much trouble either. The advantage for the M60 would be it's much faster fire rate, optics and fire control system. The T-72 would be much slower in detecting, tracking and firing on it's targets that the M60.
The M60 was a stop gap tank but ended up being fielding for much longer than the US military entended.
I realize that 99% of you have probably never even seen a real tank, much less know anything about them, so don't try and act like an expert. I read one stupid comment that said "since the T-72 can take out an Abrams it should easily destroy a M60" lol. First off the T-72 (even it's upgraded version) is no match for an Abrams and I'm pretty sure that no US Abrams has ever been destroyed by a T-72 but it's not from the lack of not trying lol.
The T-72 is sorta like the Mig 29, they both are probably one of the worst pieces of modern military equipment ever made if you look at their combat record and how they have faired in battle.
Daca e cineva Roman sami spuna si mie cum se chiama jocul asta
T72 uses composite armor...
And thus, the Abrams was developed.
Hitler vs Stalin 3?
I hate saying this because sadly it is true; the allies didn't learn proper tank building until well after the Korean war. But even in Vietnam the Armor of the United States was lacking and it shows. Most Russian vehicles forego comfort and crew safety for robust durability and reliability.
Many American tanks until the last years of Vietnam may have had cutting edge technology; but the Russian tanks outclassed and outgunned American ranks again and again. That is the reason why tanks like the M1 were invented. Vietnam is the only conflict close to today's warfare where American and Russian tanks squared off with similar features but with results that didn't favor the U.S.
Korea doesn't count because they didn't have half the features then tanks do now.
Haz un vídeo de tanques Tiger 1 VS M60,T72
T80u vs M1 Abrams.
T72 has the composite armor
German invasion of Stalingrad
Tank battles like that are not the way to fight
Out of the western tanks of the same era as the Soviet T-72M shown in the video (at least I think it's a T-72M), the American M60A3 shown in the video isn't the best choice to take on a T-72 head on. The British FV4201 Chieftain, specifically the Mk.11 model, would have been a better choice. It has a 120mm L11A5 gun instead of its predecessor, the 105mm L7 (which the M60 had; designated as M68), which allowed for firepower closer to the T-72M's 125mm 2A46M gun than the L7 would have given, which is also the Chieftain's greatest advantage over other western tanks. The Chieftain Mk.11's armor is better than the M60A3's armor, albeit not as good the T-72's. It's biggest downside to the Chieftain Mk.11 would be its speed in which it was notorious for being slow. It was the slowest of all the tanks of its era, but considering this would be a full frontal fight with no real flanking going on, that really shouldn't be much of a problem. I would actually like to see you do a video of the Chieftain Mk.11 facing off with the T-72M. That, and seeing the German Leopard 1 vs the French AMX-30.
М60А3 превосходит Т -72М, лучше было бы сравнить его с Т-72Б обр.1984/89, вот тут уже скорее всего победителем выйдет Т-72.
What game name?
Men of War Assault Squad 2, credits also to game Call to Arms
A 1960 tank vs a 1971 tank?
M60 A3 its a 1978 tank
Make fight with t 72 and Centurion 9
м60 надо сравнивать с т62
In WarThunder this is a no competition, hands down, guaranteed win for the T72. They would literally have no losses.
Probably because War Thunder even on sim settings isn't remotely a tank sim. It doesn't model differences in optics quality/FCS/stabilization quality. At most it shows different zoom levels and a binary "has/doesn't have" choice for two-plane stabilization, but none of the actual vehicle specifics that set them apart. And for that matter it doesn't give vehicles era-appropriate ammunition either: it just gives them whatever is considered balanced in battle rank terms. That having been said, this video is of some Men of War mod (not Armored Warfare, as it is oddly tagged) which is even less realistic/more video gamey than War Thunder.
Play an actual tank sim like Steel Beasts and you'll see the T-72A is pretty closely matched with the M60A3 TTS using M774, with advantage going to the A3 TTS w/M774 at ranges past 1.5km, because of its superior 1st round hit capability (itself owed to the superior fire control system).
เรื่องจริง ๆ ปืน 105 มม.ของเอ็ม 60 เอ 3 ไม่สามารถเจาะเกราะ T.72 ได้ ในซีรี่ส์ เอ็ม.60 เหลือแต่รุ่น เอ็ม.60 เอ.2 MMG 152 ที่สามารถยิงจรวดโทว์ ออกจากปืนใหญ่ 152 มม.ได้เท่านั้น ที่เชื่อว่าพอรับมือกับ T.72 ได้ แต่เอ็ม.60 ก็หนักและอืดอาดเกินไป จึงไม่ใช่เรื่องง่ายที่เอ็ม.60 จะประมือกับ T.72 ได้
เอ็ม.60 ไม่มีระบบสลัดป้อมปืนทิ้ง เมื่อถูกยิงเพื่อช่วยสลายแรงระเบิด และความร้อนในตัวรถ
Really, the 105 mm M60 A3 gun cannot penetrate the T.72 armor in the M 60 series, leaving only the M60A.2 MMG 152 model capable of launching the TOW rocket. Can only leave 152 mm cannon Who believe that when dealing with T.72 but M. 60 is too heavy and lingering Therefore it is not easy for M. 60 to be able to deal with T.72
M. 60 does not have a turret salad system. When shot to help break down the explosion And the heat in the car
cool
All I would have to say is to this in 1982 when Israel used the M60 main battle tanks against syrian's t72s they wiped them out,, and the Israeli and tanks were actually outnumbered
I was the TC on a m60a3
six day war in a nutshell
but with the M60 winning
+Crankiebox 99 The ones who carry the fight there are Centurions.
@@sweetballs4742 true
Brainiac .. the T73 never appeared in the 6 day war... the best Soviet tank fielded was the T62 , along with the usual T55, su100 etc
That's like stepping on babies!!!!!
Just a game not very realistic. The T 72 has a 125 mm smoothbore main gun that out ranged the M60 105 mm rifled main gun. Fire control may help the M60 plus crew training may give them the edge, but it is way out gunned! In reality the T72 would sit back out of range pounding the M60.
T 72 wins. ... gets glasses out lol
In reality the M60A3 is better than the T-72A thanks to the fire control system
Miles better. A3TTS tanks were actually superior to the early M1's in many regards.
Cope more.
*Welcome to the gulf war*