These videos all ignore the science. There are many dozens of papers showing that microwaves work by agonizing l-type voltage gated calcium channels, which then stimulate the production of inflammatory cytokines. There is clear evidence of oxidative stress, which is reduced by known antioxidants. There are separate papers showing that microwaves break down the blood brain barrier, causing leakage of toxins and neurological damage. For some reason, Dr Gregor departs completely from the scientific method when he covers this field.
@Dinar exactly. Why didn't Greger show this peer-reviewed paper for example. "In healthy participants and compared with no exposure, 50-minute cell phone exposure was associated with increased brain glucose metabolism in the region closest to the antenna." www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892/ Or here's another interesting one: "...our analysis demonstrates that low-intensity RFR is an expressive oxidative agent for living cells with a high pathogenic potential and that the oxidative stress induced by RFR exposure should be recognized as one of the primary mechanisms of the biological activity of this kind of radiation." www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
@@DinarAndFriends I fully agree with you!! The evidence is overwhelming and the countless examples of people getting cancer from this damaging radiation are everywhere!! How can one care so much about the food that humans ingest and downplay the effects of radiation that we are all swimming in? We are electromagnetic beings after all!! I urge everyone to research the latest shocking situations from Mount Greenwood school in Chicago, IL; Ripon Elementary school in California; and San Diego State University, just to name a few. Also, check out EMFscientist.org , wifidangers.com , StoptheCrime.net , and whatis5g.info This radiation is a slow kill grid and Qualcomm KNOWS it! Do your own research people before it is all scrubbed from the internet! Dr. Jack Kruse (nerosurgeon) said the following in Feb. of 2019, "Health food won't save you from the 5G Apocalypse." Let that sink in...
@@WakeUpCall888 You are correct. >>How can one care so much about the food that humans ingest and downplay the effects of radiation that we are all swimming in? Perhaps he lacks an understanding of voltage-gated ion channels - he wouldn't have covered this properly in an M.D. course. Or maybe he has been "warned" not to go too close to the science in this area.
That was my initial feeling but the point being violent adolescent male sexual behavior isn't likely caused by the deleterious effects of RF radiation on their brains as opposed to the influence of the violent sexual content they are watching on WI-FI devices and acting out.
I think that healthy eating is only a part of good health. Everything affects our health. Sex means hormones and they seems to have major affect on our bodies. The question should be why schools don't teach good nutrition or how to deal with mental health or in general how to prepare ourselves how to deal with life ?
@@tjitjo If you feel I missed the point it would be worthy to point out what specifically I missed but I beg to differ; 4:26. I think the purpose of this video is Dr. Greger is taking a shot at some of his colleagues and especially some of the more dubious alternative health advocates that sound off about the dangers of RF radiation on cognitive function/behavior despite not having hard evidence for it; That's not to say there may not be some concern over RF. I've seen many of these characters show up on videos from seminars hosted by the Hippocrates Institute.
SulforaphaneMeUp, The Sears catalog, and all the other materials we used when we were kids, was probably better then the explicit videos leaving nothing to the imagination about every crevice of the human body, while still conveying a distorted view of sex, that kids are exposed to today. Everything is overkill through the Internet. Not just porn. We are deluged with EVERYTHING!
In Russia, everyone talks about the dangers of Wi-Fi, we have a good researcher "Tyunyaev" (last name), which shows that it is impossible to measure EVERYTHING with one instrument. waves of different frequencies from other devices create a common "mess", and he used very expensive instruments from the laboratory to show that the space of an ordinary house, where there is Wi-Fi, a TV set, and a PC, is a potentially dangerous area for a person, for a human cell.
You don't need expensive equipment to do that: I can do it myself. You just need equipment which is not broad-spectrum. The USSR was working on this several decades before the West. Moreover, people are much better educated in Russia than they are in the US.
Raja You're full of shit. Probably too brainwashed to realize that it's Satan that is controlling this channel. Illuminati is a distraction from the _real_ truth. Can't expect much from you guys 😑
More than 28 thousand studies have been done on this subject and yes they all point to that type of radiation being harmful. Anyone who says differently doesn't know enough or knows but wants people to suffer. It really is that simple. Then there's the fact that the telecommunications industry(which is absolutely massive) uses this same type of radiation. The last thing they'd ever want is all these studies becoming common public knowledge. They could lose billions if not trillions.
@@inverted8028 it's funny you comment now, I've been 'sick' for a week, and every time I leave the house it clears up turns out after yesterday measuring the levels for the first time in ages that there's a LOT of radiation here(much more than when I moved in) basically had throat pain, coughing and a bloody nose for a week now interesting that it clears up when I'm on the move in differen areas before you ask, I've tried everything in the house - opening windows, changing humidity the list goes on even in the cold wet weather here currently it clears up so incredibly fast as soon as I'm inside again BAM it starts playing up again also no I don't have any radiation sources in the house, it's all external it's a well-known fact that these kinds of radiations can cause flu-like symptoms at best
Compromise solution: get a WiFi router that you can set to automatically shut off the WiFi RF during sleeping hours as well as reduce permanently the output to RF antenna in the settings to the minimum required to achieve the speeds you need (frequently only 50% of the standard default power setting and maybe even 25% for some smaller places). I have done this literally decades at this point. Third party software may be required for some models. Just be advised that your neighbors still have all of their WiFi on all the time at full power....
Do you realise "no transmission - no emission"? If you sleep why the FK you need to switch it off there is no radiation. People fool themselves everywhere. It's like grassfed beef. THINK!
Why did you turn this into a porn video? Shameful that you didn't write the title to reflect it. I emailed this to my nephew's before watching it fully!!
Yeah, I don't know why he said it's about the content. The whole point was that the problem is with the ease of access afforded by the technology, rather than the radiation.
Well the p-hub does offer more videos than there are people on this planet and some of it's features are more advanced than RUclips's so he's got a point there. Though I do think risks go up more when people watch (adult) content while taking part in traffic compared to being in school...
Idk if it effect my health or not but everytime i turn off 4g and wifi on my phone i sleep better and less stress. But if i put the phone near my head with either wifi or 4g on it make my head hurt like the feeling of stress.
I think it all needs to go. WiFi, cell phones, radio towers., satellites… we’re cooking ourselves in microwaves. Sure at first, a few here a few there. Low power…. But today… there are towers, wifi, cell phones EVERYWHERE. There are so so many. How can we even control the waves when there are thousands of them coming from every direction. How can we control the vibration in our system. Like how a microwave cooks your food. And eye damage to screen lights and UV flashes for face scanning. The harmful side comes from the rate of exposure.
Wow. I feel like the nutrition facts videos are just getting worse and worse!! They are so disorganized and unfocused and just wander all over the place and don't stick to the topic. I mean this video was supposed to be about how Wi-Fi radiation affects brain function, and then all of a sudden we're talking about the effects of pornography on children. This is really bad. Why didn't you just make a separate video on the effects of pornography on children?
This should be two videos. Pornography does not require exposure to Wifi radiations. You might be able to fix this by changing the title, but it would be a challenge to write.
I came for the health risks of Wi-FI technology, not internet porn. How is this relevant? If it's a health standpoint I might as well say, children with parental control have better health because Wi-Fi and instant access to NutritionFacts.org are a GOOD thing. Wi-Fi is a delivery system, it delivers both good and bad things. It is very subjective and hard to make any reasonable claims about health, other than the objective radiation that this delivery system radiates. Which this video covered and where it should have ended. With science, not opinion.
@@demcomp There are CTs and panic going around about 5G; it's the next government plot to sterilize everyone or something. Mind you, I think these technologies should be thoroughly researched before being broadly employed.
As a therapist for sex addicts and their spouses (some of whom majored in porn use) I can tell you that even those who would never tolerate violence in their porn experienced serious implications in many facets of their lives. Want an example or 5? Impotence, accidental sex offender status (it’s not uncommon for child porn to be mixed in with batches of “normal” porn), loss of jobs, marriages, visitation with children, friendships, health, etc. It’s a huge problem. Check out books by Dr Patrick Carnes or attend SAA, SA, or SLAA meetings to get help for compulsive sexual behavior. Partners can attend S Anon or CoSa meetings and read books by Claudia Black.
It is interesting that the small exposure ( an hour) to porn can make them violent. What does that say about the affect of the many hours of violent, brutal killing they do each day on video games.
If you want to examine youth access to porn, put that in the video title. Don't mislead then preach. Usually your videos are great but this one is disappointing.
Ok... So the solution to this is studies where they control for different types of content use against very small use and having the cellphone on you at all times...
Unrelated comment: I get bloated and gassy when I eat beans and/or broccoli/cauliflower. Anyone else suffering this same fate on the #dailydozen ? Anyone know any workarounds?
And yet, after decades of attempts to show any kind of correlation between porn consumption and "violence against women" (nobody cares about violence against men, obviously) they have come up with nothing. If there was a causal link then sexual harassment should have gone up as access increased through the internet and guess what? It hasn't, instead the stats are going down. Funny how this works: videogames does not make kids violent, porn does not turn kids into rapists and come to think of it, jazz music did not turn a generation into animals either. I'm disappointed, Dr Greger. Very selective reading of the studies in this case.
This is the first time I even gave you a thumbs down. The debate about pornography is important, but this is not relevant to the title of this video. That's false advertisement and I expect better from you.
Bro, focus. Is this a video about Wi-Fi or about porn effects on the young? RUclips doesn't charge you per video do you want to make videos on two different topics, then just make two videos.
Nice conclusions: Make sure to know what kind of porn your child is watching on their smartphone while at school!!! And, phone holsters may have an immediate ability to lessen mating success by making you look like a dorky dad, while in the long run they might have the opposite effect due to lack of decreased fertility from keeping phones in your pocket.
the funny backstory to studies like these is that ppl mustve been like "hell, these ppl who use wifi r just HELLA dumb...cant even figure out 10% of a 100 without a calculator, we gotta test if it wifries them", i mean why else would u consider such a specific thing?
Interpretation is made even more difficult by the fact that it has been shown that women consume most of the violent porn! See: "Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are" by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz
A bit misleading title but in general it's a big issue that parents seems to not be aware of and trust schools to much. How many of you parents had a good look into sexual education that starts in grade 5? I don't believe that in that age our children have to start experimenting sexualy and basically those lessons encourage them to do. That's not normal!!!!! Then you have almost all school expecting children to have iPad so even if you against mobile phones they will have access to porn.
Why spend 65% of this upload on sex and phonographic content the question was does rf wifi or mobile phones cause brain problems and sleep problems not via watching content but the rf field generated. (Thumb down)
I didn't see any deep dive into whether or not the microwaves cause any brain problems. Was only presented with a red herring about pornography access through smart devices. Maybe there is something about smart devices that makes them more addictive?? I have had the internet since 1995 and had high speed internet since 2002 and I can definitely tell a difference between watching porn on WIFI vs. a hard wired connection.
Even 4G is very bad for our health!! We are electromagnetic beings and these frequencies are slowly killing us! Dr. Sharon Goldberg presented CLEAR evidence at a Senate hearing (regarding Bill 637) that Microwave Radiation is linked to not only cancer, but DNA damage, Cardiomyopathy, and Neuropsychiatric Effects!!
@@universe8834 Thank you - apparently no one else caught my mix up with 5G and 5GHz, and commented as if I knew that I was talking about 5G when I didn't - I thought I was talking about 5GHz. Thank you for clearing that up!
To expect men to dominate them, have a kielbasa sausage, do all of the work, use holes that were not meant for that activity, take videos, and for women to pretend to enjoy it all.
@@chrisnamaste3572 Why would any woman voluntarily choose to star in such an adult film instead of plumbing, carpentry, road repair, logging ... or a hundred other jobs that are actually useful? Why do some women prefer to get paid for that type of activity instead of doing something useful?
Barrie Trower tries to tell people about it. Loads of m1nd c0ntrol abilities in these freqs. Paul Batcho is another whitleblower on the mk aspects of it.
I do like the normally very factual Dr. Greger analysis, but this time it was far from the merit. It's a kind of mental gymnastic (or mental equilibristic) effort that I'm always amused by (from wifi to p0rn in no time ;) ). First he didn't take into consideration such variables as exposure duration, distance from both access-points and built-in WiFi cards in electronics, not mentioning transmission power of these interfaces which (depending on the manufacturer, technology used and device state) can frequently exceed safety standards when overriden, faulty or misused. And no, I'm not a tinfoil hat wearer. I use this technology quite a lot, but knowing how does it work, from the physical layer to data transmission protocol nuances, makes all the difference when it comes to spending time with wifi and designing the wireless network infrastrucutre. Ridiculing or oversimplifying aspects of the wireless data transmission does not solve risk issues. Blaming it on the p0rn is... well, quite an abuse :/ And btw, accusing tinfoil hat wearers of being p0rn addicts is at least awkward.
How did a nutrition video become antiporn? Disappointed. Also, there's not enough data to conclude that porn leads to violence, in fact it's ridiculous.
We have a bunch of cell phone and wi-fi videos now. They are all here: ruclips.net/p/PL5TLzNi5fYd85arEpHCsmdu55J_LOCpoP -NF Team
Please do a video on 5G. Thank you!
These videos all ignore the science. There are many dozens of papers showing that microwaves work by agonizing l-type voltage gated calcium channels, which then stimulate the production of inflammatory cytokines. There is clear evidence of oxidative stress, which is reduced by known antioxidants. There are separate papers showing that microwaves break down the blood brain barrier, causing leakage of toxins and neurological damage.
For some reason, Dr Gregor departs completely from the scientific method when he covers this field.
@Dinar exactly. Why didn't Greger show this peer-reviewed paper for example. "In healthy participants and compared with no exposure, 50-minute cell phone exposure was associated with increased brain glucose metabolism in the region closest to the antenna."
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892/
Or here's another interesting one:
"...our analysis demonstrates that low-intensity RFR is an expressive oxidative agent for living cells with a high pathogenic potential and that the oxidative stress induced by RFR exposure should be recognized as one of the primary mechanisms of the biological activity of this kind of radiation."
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
@@DinarAndFriends I fully agree with you!! The evidence is overwhelming and the countless examples of people getting cancer from this damaging radiation are everywhere!! How can one care so much about the food that humans ingest and downplay the effects of radiation that we are all swimming in? We are electromagnetic beings after all!!
I urge everyone to research the latest shocking situations from Mount Greenwood school in Chicago, IL; Ripon Elementary school in California; and San Diego State University, just to name a few.
Also, check out EMFscientist.org , wifidangers.com , StoptheCrime.net , and whatis5g.info
This radiation is a slow kill grid and Qualcomm KNOWS it! Do your own research people before it is all scrubbed from the internet!
Dr. Jack Kruse (nerosurgeon) said the following in Feb. of 2019, "Health food won't save you from the 5G Apocalypse." Let that sink in...
@@WakeUpCall888
You are correct.
>>How can one care so much about the food that humans ingest and downplay the effects of radiation that we are all swimming in?
Perhaps he lacks an understanding of voltage-gated ion channels - he wouldn't have covered this properly in an M.D. course. Or maybe he has been "warned" not to go too close to the science in this area.
Well...that took a turn.
From Wifi to Porn... Sounds like Tim Shieff's saturday night before he eats his piece of salmon.
Lol 😂😂😂😂
@@Retrosenescent golden elixir.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why did this video turn into porn science vs WIFI??
That was my initial feeling but the point being violent adolescent male sexual behavior isn't likely caused by the deleterious effects of RF radiation on their brains as opposed to the influence of the violent sexual content they are watching on WI-FI devices and acting out.
I think that healthy eating is only a part of good health. Everything affects our health. Sex means hormones and they seems to have major affect on our bodies. The question should be why schools don't teach good nutrition or how to deal with mental health or in general how to prepare ourselves how to deal with life ?
@@NGC6144 not the conclusion made in the video but ok
@@tjitjo If you feel I missed the point it would be worthy to point out what specifically I missed but I beg to differ; 4:26. I think the purpose of this video is Dr. Greger is taking a shot at some of his colleagues and especially some of the more dubious alternative health advocates that sound off about the dangers of RF radiation on cognitive function/behavior despite not having hard evidence for it; That's not to say there may not be some concern over RF. I've seen many of these characters show up on videos from seminars hosted by the Hippocrates Institute.
When I was a kid, I had to use the Sears catalog underwear section. Things sure have changed.
I had to use Kmart flyers to get me through tough times between catalogs.
@@pauliethemushroomman Yes, we were the lucky ones that were not exposed to wifi radiation ealy in life. ha
SulforaphaneMeUp, The Sears catalog, and all the other materials we used when we were kids, was probably better then the explicit videos leaving nothing to the imagination about every crevice of the human body, while still conveying a distorted view of sex, that kids are exposed to today. Everything is overkill through the Internet. Not just porn. We are deluged with EVERYTHING!
So basically you're like over 100 years old
@@orgiophant93 so basically, you are like twelve years old....🤣
Yes... our... "researchers" have carefully sat through and "content coded" 400 pornographic films.
I know right ..... I was dying
In Russia, everyone talks about the dangers of Wi-Fi, we have a good researcher "Tyunyaev" (last name), which shows that it is impossible to measure EVERYTHING with one instrument. waves of different frequencies from other devices create a common "mess", and he used very expensive instruments from the laboratory to show that the space of an ordinary house, where there is Wi-Fi, a TV set, and a PC, is a potentially dangerous area for a person, for a human cell.
You don't need expensive equipment to do that: I can do it myself. You just need equipment which is not broad-spectrum.
The USSR was working on this several decades before the West. Moreover, people are much better educated in Russia than they are in the US.
"everyone"? Are you in a mental institution? NOBODY talks about this shit in Russia. There are more important problems for EVERYBODY.
Just because he can detect a lot of something doesn’t mean it’s dangerous, I can detect a lot of oxygen around me but I’m not dying
How did this go from discussing the potential negative effects of WIFI radio frequency to internet(porn) content. What is the correlation?
@@gy5rffg5rf So then why didn't he give it that title, instead of one that's misleading?
Please, do 5G next.
edit : well... that was about easy porn everywhere more than about WiFi.
it's not widely available. Which means probably there aren't many studies on its effects.
he wont, since he works for the illuminati
@@rajashahja8975 if you are serious...then you're a drone.
Raja You're full of shit. Probably too brainwashed to realize that it's Satan that is controlling this channel. Illuminati is a distraction from the _real_ truth. Can't expect much from you guys 😑
he is a big scoundrel , trying to depopulate the world off humans with his Vegan lies.
That went from 0 to 100 real quick
💯
Just like porn!
More than 28 thousand studies have been done on this subject and yes they all point to that type of radiation being harmful. Anyone who says differently doesn't know enough or knows but wants people to suffer. It really is that simple. Then there's the fact that the telecommunications industry(which is absolutely massive) uses this same type of radiation. The last thing they'd ever want is all these studies becoming common public knowledge. They could lose billions if not trillions.
And if you go out and talk about it, dig into my videos and see the repercussions.
@@andreah6175 Can you link it?
Not one study can find a mechanism of action
@@inverted8028 it's funny you comment now, I've been 'sick' for a week, and every time I leave the house it clears up
turns out after yesterday measuring the levels for the first time in ages that there's a LOT of radiation here(much more than when I moved in)
basically had throat pain, coughing and a bloody nose for a week now
interesting that it clears up when I'm on the move in differen areas
before you ask, I've tried everything in the house - opening windows, changing humidity the list goes on
even in the cold wet weather here currently it clears up so incredibly fast
as soon as I'm inside again BAM it starts playing up again
also no I don't have any radiation sources in the house, it's all external
it's a well-known fact that these kinds of radiations can cause flu-like symptoms at best
Yet the google promoted government disinformation says "Nooo!" Shooter McGavin style.
"researchers sat through 400 content-coded .."ehm porn"... videos" . Things we do for scientific progress these days.
But I watch your videos on my mobile phone :(
Get yourself a mobile adaptor that allows you to connect a ethernet cable to it meaning no more wifi
Compromise solution: get a WiFi router that you can set to automatically shut off the WiFi RF during sleeping hours as well as reduce permanently the output to RF antenna in the settings to the minimum required to achieve the speeds you need (frequently only 50% of the standard default power setting and maybe even 25% for some smaller places). I have done this literally decades at this point. Third party software may be required for some models. Just be advised that your neighbors still have all of their WiFi on all the time at full power....
3 dollar analog time clock will do the trick..
@@Crepitom Not for adjusting RF power.
Chris Namaste Most new routers have eco mode. Isn’t that enough?
Do you realise "no transmission - no emission"? If you sleep why the FK you need to switch it off there is no radiation. People fool themselves everywhere. It's like grassfed beef. THINK!
Broccoli and Amla go head to head against Wifi and Porn...
...next...
wow. that escalated quickly!
LOL i wrote the same thing before i read your comment :D
Read the book "Your Brain On Porn" by Gary Wilson
The problem is.. Everywhere you go nowadays has wifi so even if you don't personally have it on, you're screwed because it's everywhere.
Why did you turn this into a porn video? Shameful that you didn't write the title to reflect it. I emailed this to my nephew's before watching it fully!!
Hahahaha (sorry but this is funny)
And the problem is ...?
Anybody else catch Dr. Greger saying "shallower penetration depth" @ 2:20? That was BEFORE he transitioned to the porn discussion!
This took a very weird turn
So explicit content is more dangerous than the way it's delivered. But wasn't there explicit content way before Wifi?
Yeah, I don't know why he said it's about the content. The whole point was that the problem is with the ease of access afforded by the technology, rather than the radiation.
Well the p-hub does offer more videos than there are people on this planet and some of it's features are more advanced than RUclips's so he's got a point there. Though I do think risks go up more when people watch (adult) content while taking part in traffic compared to being in school...
Idk if it effect my health or not but everytime i turn off 4g and wifi on my phone i sleep better and less stress. But if i put the phone near my head with either wifi or 4g on it make my head hurt like the feeling of stress.
I think it all needs to go. WiFi, cell phones, radio towers., satellites… we’re cooking ourselves in microwaves. Sure at first, a few here a few there. Low power…. But today… there are towers, wifi, cell phones EVERYWHERE. There are so so many. How can we even control the waves when there are thousands of them coming from every direction. How can we control the vibration in our system. Like how a microwave cooks your food. And eye damage to screen lights and UV flashes for face scanning. The harmful side comes from the rate of exposure.
Wow. I feel like the nutrition facts videos are just getting worse and worse!! They are so disorganized and unfocused and just wander all over the place and don't stick to the topic. I mean this video was supposed to be about how Wi-Fi radiation affects brain function, and then all of a sudden we're talking about the effects of pornography on children. This is really bad. Why didn't you just make a separate video on the effects of pornography on children?
I just wanted to know about WiFi and possible effects on the brain. Why did this suddenly turn into a rant about porn? Talk about a bait and switch.
While the second part was unexpected. Ultimately, I come to this channel for health related research. The second part was informative and appreciated.
This should be two videos. Pornography does not require exposure to Wifi radiations. You might be able to fix this by changing the title, but it would be a challenge to write.
honestly who watches porn for more than an hour
?
Addicts.
I came for the health risks of Wi-FI technology, not internet porn. How is this relevant? If it's a health standpoint I might as well say, children with parental control have better health because Wi-Fi and instant access to NutritionFacts.org are a GOOD thing. Wi-Fi is a delivery system, it delivers both good and bad things. It is very subjective and hard to make any reasonable claims about health, other than the objective radiation that this delivery system radiates. Which this video covered and where it should have ended. With science, not opinion.
Make a series on Lyme disease please :)
Prohibit 5G
What's wrong with 5G?
@@demcomp There are CTs and panic going around about 5G; it's the next government plot to sterilize everyone or something. Mind you, I think these technologies should be thoroughly researched before being broadly employed.
@@demcomp ~Please read my comment underneath Dr. Gregor's post at the top for more info...
As a therapist for sex addicts and their spouses (some of whom majored in porn use) I can tell you that even those who would never tolerate violence in their porn experienced serious implications in many facets of their lives. Want an example or 5? Impotence, accidental sex offender status (it’s not uncommon for child porn to be mixed in with batches of “normal” porn), loss of jobs, marriages, visitation with children, friendships, health, etc. It’s a huge problem. Check out books by Dr Patrick Carnes or attend SAA, SA, or SLAA meetings to get help for compulsive sexual behavior. Partners can attend S Anon or CoSa meetings and read books by Claudia Black.
LMAO The picture at @4:23
It is interesting that the small exposure ( an hour) to porn can make them violent. What does that say about the affect of the many hours of violent, brutal killing they do each day on video games.
or all the violence in every other TV show or movie
switched topics real fast once you dismissed the wifi problems as nothing.
This video derailed mid through
If you want to examine youth access to porn, put that in the video title. Don't mislead then preach. Usually your videos are great but this one is disappointing.
@E Allen most people do
The honest ones anyway 🤗
@@roberttownson4776 Yea and not just young males as he states. Tons of research shows that girls/women watch porn in high numbers as well.
I didn't quite understand. Are we exposed to wifi? Is being exposed to wifi radiation harmful?
Everyone: What's the facts on WiFi's effect on health?
NutritionFacts: Porn!
I didn't see any tests on this after saying "put it to the test". Only saw a bunch of articles. Those aren't tests.
Reverse clickbait, brilliant!
Is microwaved food bad for you, Dr. Greger? I google searched, but I only trust your feedback. Thank you!!!🙏🙏🙏
What does this have to do with nutrition ?
Ok... So the solution to this is studies where they control for different types of content use against very small use and having the cellphone on you at all times...
Wi-Fi bad. Porn bad.
👍
Unrelated comment: I get bloated and gassy when I eat beans and/or broccoli/cauliflower. Anyone else suffering this same fate on the #dailydozen ? Anyone know any workarounds?
And yet, after decades of attempts to show any kind of correlation between porn consumption and "violence against women" (nobody cares about violence against men, obviously) they have come up with nothing. If there was a causal link then sexual harassment should have gone up as access increased through the internet and guess what? It hasn't, instead the stats are going down. Funny how this works: videogames does not make kids violent, porn does not turn kids into rapists and come to think of it, jazz music did not turn a generation into animals either.
I'm disappointed, Dr Greger. Very selective reading of the studies in this case.
This is the first time I even gave you a thumbs down. The debate about pornography is important, but this is not relevant to the title of this video. That's false advertisement and I expect better from you.
And then he pulls the old bait and switch on us. I guess I can skip church this Sunday
What does WiFi have to do with nutrition?????
Bro, focus. Is this a video about Wi-Fi or about porn effects on the young? RUclips doesn't charge you per video do you want to make videos on two different topics, then just make two videos.
This is the closest thing the doctor has ever had to clickbait.
That video derailed a bit.
The men making jokes about the porn belong in the study. Both the porn and the brain damage study.
This is more about porn than EMF! What’s going on Dr Gregor? What’s with this video?
Nice conclusions: Make sure to know what kind of porn your child is watching on their smartphone while at school!!! And, phone holsters may have an immediate ability to lessen mating success by making you look like a dorky dad, while in the long run they might have the opposite effect due to lack of decreased fertility from keeping phones in your pocket.
Could wifi/phone waves induce a thought in a persons mind?
So, if we get rid of all war movies does that mean we can avoid WW3 or any other war?
Old soviet propaganda saying:
"You play a jazz today - next day you sell your state away."
Isn't it too far of a stretch from wifi to porn?
btw, it's a bit delayed, it should be an April Fools episode ;)
came for cancer research, left with porn research
I blame Wi-Fi for all my misfortunes
Wtf happened to the info about WiFi? How did you get from that to porn???
the funny backstory to studies like these is
that ppl mustve been like "hell, these ppl who use wifi r just HELLA dumb...cant even figure out 10% of a 100 without a calculator, we gotta test if it wifries them", i mean why else would u consider such a specific thing?
What does it it do to all the people in the library especially the librarians who are glued to WiFi computers 40 hours a week
You don't know about WIFI, porn, and sexual aggression until... more research.
That said "mankind". If you can't even read, there's no reason to take anything you say seriously.
so no?
Interpretation is made even more difficult by the fact that it has been shown that women consume most of the violent porn! See: "Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are"
by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz
A bit misleading title but in general it's a big issue that parents seems to not be aware of and trust schools to much. How many of you parents had a good look into sexual education that starts in grade 5? I don't believe that in that age our children have to start experimenting sexualy and basically those lessons encourage them to do. That's not normal!!!!! Then you have almost all school expecting children to have iPad so even if you against mobile phones they will have access to porn.
that escalated quickly
tHunbs down. title misleading as to the real message
Short answer, yes.
Why spend 65% of this upload on sex and phonographic content the question was does rf wifi or mobile phones cause brain problems and sleep problems not via watching content but the rf field generated. (Thumb down)
I'm next to my phone 24/7, even when I sleep.
Lincoln Clay Airplane mode is key my friend
Im using wifi while watching this.
This video definitely strayed on topic
More plot twist than avengers
I didn't see any deep dive into whether or not the microwaves cause any brain problems. Was only presented with a red herring about pornography access through smart devices. Maybe there is something about smart devices that makes them more addictive?? I have had the internet since 1995 and had high speed internet since 2002 and I can definitely tell a difference between watching porn on WIFI vs. a hard wired connection.
From Wi-Fi exposure to... porn???
I'm confused - are you saying that 5GHz is safe, and it's the content that we have to be careful of?
yes, be more worried about what you watch online rather than the 5G itself
ftr: he was talking about wifi on 5ghz frequency, which is something different from 5th generation wireless mobile data transfer.
you're probably mixing 5G with 5 GHz wifi which is a different thing. Dr. Greger was talking about wifi 5GHz.
Even 4G is very bad for our health!! We are electromagnetic beings and these frequencies are slowly killing us! Dr. Sharon Goldberg presented CLEAR evidence at a Senate hearing (regarding Bill 637) that Microwave Radiation is linked to not only cancer, but DNA damage, Cardiomyopathy, and Neuropsychiatric Effects!!
@@universe8834 Thank you - apparently no one else caught my mix up with 5G and 5GHz, and commented as if I knew that I was talking about 5G when I didn't - I thought I was talking about 5GHz. Thank you for clearing that up!
Came for the wifi, stayed for the porn.
What's it teaching women?
To expect men to dominate them, have a kielbasa sausage, do all of the work, use holes that were not meant for that activity, take videos, and for women to pretend to enjoy it all.
@@chrisnamaste3572
Why would any woman voluntarily choose to star in such an adult film instead of plumbing, carpentry, road repair, logging ... or a hundred other jobs that are actually useful? Why do some women prefer to get paid for that type of activity instead of doing something useful?
Wi-porn? Porn-fi? These two are related how? Let's... Put it to the test!
Ehh... space out much? Disappointing.
Stopped watching porn for this vid
Your voice is unclear with weird accent. Please always come up with proper clarity of words-delivery for audience.
Excellent and important topics Dr. Greger. Thanks again.
Barrie Trower tries to tell people about it. Loads of m1nd c0ntrol abilities in these freqs. Paul Batcho is another whitleblower on the mk aspects of it.
I do like the normally very factual Dr. Greger analysis, but this time it was far from the merit. It's a kind of mental gymnastic (or mental equilibristic) effort that I'm always amused by (from wifi to p0rn in no time ;) ).
First he didn't take into consideration such variables as exposure duration, distance from both access-points and built-in WiFi cards in electronics, not mentioning transmission power of these interfaces which (depending on the manufacturer, technology used and device state) can frequently exceed safety standards when overriden, faulty or misused.
And no, I'm not a tinfoil hat wearer. I use this technology quite a lot, but knowing how does it work, from the physical layer to data transmission protocol nuances, makes all the difference when it comes to spending time with wifi and designing the wireless network infrastrucutre.
Ridiculing or oversimplifying aspects of the wireless data transmission does not solve risk issues.
Blaming it on the p0rn is... well, quite an abuse :/
And btw, accusing tinfoil hat wearers of being p0rn addicts is at least awkward.
5g please!
How did a nutrition video become antiporn? Disappointed. Also, there's not enough data to conclude that porn leads to violence, in fact it's ridiculous.
"Self-reported" What if porn made them more self-critical? bias
Does porn affect brain function?
By an Earthing mat. I've had mine for years.
Looks like the microwave video. xD
closely monitoring children may very well affect their upbringing
more negatively than porn.
Good to know. I’ve heard worries about this and am relieved to hear that Wifi doesn’t cause any brain damage. Not that i ever turned mine off 😁😁😁
How you feeling now?
Amen! Thanks Dr. Greger!!!
Woah Great Video!! Thanks Dr Greger! such a underrated but relevant topic
10/10 Facts
So wifi is ok but porn isn't i gather? 🙄
porn is bad, look up "no fap" very insightful