2024 Ford F-150 2.7L V6 vs 2024 Chevy Silverado TurboMax: Which Engine Is Best?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 май 2024
- Today I compare a 2024 Ford F-150 2.7L V6 to a 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 2.7L Turbo!
Ask For Jayden: www.lhmford.com/
Ask For Jeffrey: www.seinerchevy.com/
Learn How To Save Time And Money The Next Time You Buy A Car: benjaminhardy.podia.com/learn...
Second Channel: / @thebenhardyshow
Instagram: ben_hardypl
Facebook: @benhardycar 
Авто/Мото
I have a 2016 2.7 v6 with 186,470 miles and nothing but brakes and oil changes pull a 23 ft trailer every summer love it
No competition, the 2.7 EB wins all day. Reliable, economical, and an absolute rocketship (0-60 under 6 seconds)
Can't comment on the Chevy. I haven't driven one. I'm sure it's a fine truck, but I do own a 2022 F-150 with a 2.7, and I really like it.
I own a 21 2.7L stx. I commute 60 miles each day city/highway. I’m averaging 23.2 mpg on 87 gas. Worth it all day.
Hands down the ford. That 2.7 ecoboost has been reliable and always surprising. I can deal with a 4 banger in a midsizer but not a full-size truck
dumb comment
The 2.7 EB is reliable but Ford ruined it a couple years ago with oil pump belts and EGR coolers that fail.
Ecocrap
@@karlschauff7989that happened in 2017. Still no failures related to the changes. This is internet fodder.
Ford f150's don't hold up in car accidents
I know from experience
I've owned the first gen 2.7 Ecoboost. It was a great little engine.
Ford 2.7!! Amazing power, reliability, and fuel mileage
Ford's don't hold up in accidents
I know from experience
Safest full size truck. They are built to sacrifice to protect occupants zone.
I owned a f150 and got Into a car accident back in January and in my opinion and experience it didn't hold up well at all
The cab and frame buckled into my leg and foot causing major damage
@@markcasler2671your alive!
@@markcasler2671 It's one of the safest vehicles on the road. Were the crash bars modified?
The 2.7 in the Ford for a win. It’s been a surprisingly reliable engine. Also the cadence of the turn signal in the Chevy would irritate me.
2.7 Ford all the way. Built like a tank (so is the Chevy tbh) but no weird cylinder deactivation tech. It's been an extremely reliable engine since its introduction.
it's been cheapened out just like everything else Ford
@@davidporter7051in what way??? The engine has been unchanged since 2017. Typical internet fodder.
Ford f150's are not built like a tank
I had one and got into a car accident
Not a good outcome
@@joshuaatkinson5810 tell me you know little without telling me you know little. It changed in 2018. Ford started using subpar oil pump drive tensioner. Recall. Faulty intake valves. Redesigned. Where have you been? Ford is the warranty repair and recall leader for 4 consecutive years.
The Chevy on the outside is a much nicer looking truck but the interior of the ford is much nicer, for me I like the Chevy better
I have a 2020 F150 with the 2.7, 38,000 miles, no problems, great engine, serves its purpose for my needs.
Should be noted that the chevy in this configuration only has a 1 speed transfer case so no 4 low.
The 2.7 Ecoboost isn't a bad motor. I'd rather that than a turbo 4 in a full sized pickup.
Not even a comparison. The new stx is like a 22 xlt
Me and the Yakov Noam team wish you lots of success. Great content!
Hi Ben I love watching your vids!!
Ty
I like the 2.7
lol j/k had that 2.7 in my F150 and loved it. no issues or complaints with motor.
She's a beauty ! I love the Carbonized grey and the pro power onboard is incredible. Love my Ecoboost engines,I'm in Middle Sackville, keep the Ford truck videos coming!!
It’s a joke Chevy does not give the two base models an updated interior.
They're fleet trim trucks. 99% of truck buyers wouldn't even consider a WT or 'Custom' trim. LT is the "base" trim level.
@@karlschauff7989 who cares if they’re base trim, if you spend that kind of money on a truck I want the updated interior. Ford updates the entire line, not just for the “99%” !!! And a base trim truck is now $40,000, hardly cheap. It truly is comical to watch Chevy people defend this, as a Ford owner, if this was Ford doing this, I would be saying the same thing. I wouldn’t be defending it.
@@karlschauff7989 And as for people not selecting that trim, the dealership literally has one on the lot, hence how he tested it, so obviously they think someone will buy it!
@@marcg.3830 The kind of guy that whines about "spending that kind of money" while looking at a fleet trim truck probably shouldn't be buying a new truck in the first place. The Custom trim is an extension of the WT trim. The dealer has it on the lot for the same reason I'm willing to bet they have a Ford XL trim on the lot. And I bet you defend all kinds of cheap things Ford does lately, like routing oil pump belts behind timing chains in the 2.7 EB and 5.0 Coyote. Or Ford using those garbage plastic oil pans. Or the warped dashes on 2015-18 F-150's because of the garbage plastic Ford was using. Or Ford using failure-prone EGR coolers on the 2.7 EB when they don't use one on the 3.5EB. Or Ford using plastic on their engine exhaust heat exchanger (w/ Powerboost engine option) so that it warps and creates a big coolant leak.
Ironic that you whine about truck prices, and then simultaneously criticize GM for not putting a more expensive interior in the fleet trims, which is exactly the kind of thing that has driven truck prices up.
@@karlschauff7989 wow, you really got your feelings hurt on this one! Believe me dude GM doesn’t care about you. No, I don’t defend anything Ford has done with cost cutting, but obviously you do with GM. Did you give GM a pass on the DOD issues that plagued their engines, how bout the lifter issues on the current ones, how bout the class action lawsuits over the 8 speed transmission?! And saying someone shouldn’t be buying a new truck if they complain about the prices, is exactly what all these manufacturers want, useful idiots such as yourself.
2.7 with the iron block. Love mine!
2.7 EB all day. Have it in my Bronco and love it. No replacement for displacement. Nice video. 😎
Would like to see comparisons of the two 2.7 with there v8 options fuel economy and power comparisons
The Ford also has compacted graphite iron block way better than aluminum and no cylinder deactivation
Ford ruined that by adding an oil pump belt that they routed behind the timing chains, and that EGR cooler. It's bad enough having EGR coolers on diesel engines. Now Ford decided to put that engine destroyer on a gas engine.
@@karlschauff7989 when did they put the oil pump belt behind the timing chain when did they add the egr cooler
@karlschauff7989 GM uses an egr cooler on their 2.7 as well
Doesn't the Chevy 2.7 L3B also have c.g.i. block?
@@karlschauff7989 I said this on your other post…. You are spreading bullshit. Those changes happened in 2017 and the engine has proved to be damn near flawless.
All the reliability turds keep running their mouth. Toyota runs belts on all their supposed bulletproof engines minus the 5.7.
You should test it in eco mode.. for even more fuel efficiency
The Chevy exhaust sounds like an old VW Beetle.
The ford sounds like a mosquito
I like the looks, sound and performance in the ford better. Also, were both 4wd?
3.5 TT Ecoboost has been a reliable engine for me. However i think Ram finally figured it out and got rid of the outdated and underpowered 5.7L hemi. The Hurricane may be smoother with the inline 6.
I've had 3 different f150s with the 2.7 ecoboost. Probably my favorite engine in any current truck after having one for some time. Great fuel economy and great pull for such a small engine. The 4 cylinder in the Chevy just does not pull as well
2.7 GM turbomax = 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm's. Ford 2.7 ecoboost = 410 ft-lb torque @ 4250 rpm's. So higher torque @ lower rpm is worse? Doesn't compute.
@@ews360 2,750 RPM for 400 lb-ft peak in the 2.7 ecoboost. You are confusing the torque specs with the 5.0 v8. It does compute
The data I intially found was incorrect. This info was found on the Ford 2024 F-150 webpage states: 2.7 ecoboost = 2015-2016 375 ft-lb @ 3,000 rpm. 2018-2020 400 ft-lb @ 2,750 rpm. 2021+ 400 lb-ft @ 3,000 rpm. So, both GM & Ford make their max torque @ same 3,000 rpm. GM makes 30 ft-lb more torque than Ford. Torque, not horse is needed in towing. So, why does the Chevy (or GMC) "just does not pull as well" w/ 30 more ft-lb of torque? That does not compute.
The custom is gross. The fact they cost the same, why would you even get that at this point
The tale of 2.7's!
Only a liberal would take a 4cyl in a full size pickup truck! 🤣
A limp wristed liberal
those are short boxes....standard is 6'6"
I got a 2016 Silverado z71 off road, 5.3 v8 brand new in Oct 2016, 65 grand, had transmission issues with it practically from day 1, had it serviced several times, rebuilt twice under warranty, just after the warranty expired it started shaking so bad that I almost lost control, I traded it in June 2022 for a 2wd colorado, v6, tow package. No cylinder deactivation bullshit, no start stop,almost 2 years later, not 1 single issue
Surprised you stayed with Chevy after that experience.
@ramfan5149 I had 2 ford's before that, an iron man explorer and then an f 150, I encountered other people who had issues with the same year as my Silverado, my wife wanted dodge, I'm not a fan, so I took a chance with the colorado, we both like it a lot
I don't like the look of the Silverado or the F-150. I bought a 2023 GMC Sierra 1500 Elevation 2.7 Turbo. So the exterior of the Sierra blows the Chevy and the Ford out of the water. I got a loaner vehicle with about 3,000 miles on in for 18,000 off sticker so basically a 60k truck for 42k. Has the 22+ GM Premium interior so makes the comparison to the Ford a little closer. Still think the Ford a hair nicer but the GMC also nice. The 2.7 Ecoboost must be hella nice because driving a 2.7 and a 5.3 GMC back to back I preferred the 4 cylinder 2.7. If your going V8 you have to get the 6.2, which I didn't want to pay for nor is it even offered on the Elevation trim anyways. In conclusion, Ford IMO makes a better base level truck and a better King of the Road Truck (Raptor R) but in between I prefer the Chevy/GMC even though on a luxury level the Platinum is beating a High Country. The GM's just look better at the end of the day.
The Chevy sounds like a Honda Civic.💪🏼
No contest on the interiors! The Chevy's interior looks 10 years old. Love Ford's digital instrument cluster.
What’s the point of even comparing fuel economy on a trip around the block …???
Needs to be at least a 30+ mile drive in each to get a somewhat accurate idea of fuel economy.
I'm a Chevy guy but this is pathetic to say the least. The Chevy interior is from 2014 atleast. This is embarrassing for the Chevy. 😥
The 5.3 and the 6.2 are also circa 2014.
Ford F150 STX all the way
Who like the ford should buy a ford pickup. Who's like the Chevrolet should buy the Chevrolet pickup
Now who buys a CHEVROLET and it a 4CYLINDER huh?
fleet maybe?
The same people that buy an F-150 with the naturally aspirated 3.3 V6. That's what the GM 2.7L is meant to compete against.
@@karlschauff7989 The 3.3 is discontinued! The 2.7 is the base engine. What are you a GM salesman or something?
@@karlschauff7989GM 2.7 turbomax (w/ 5 yr 100,000 mile warranty) makes 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Ford 2.7 ecoboost 325 horse / 410 ft-lb torque @ 4250 rpm. The Ford 3.3 produced 290 horse / w/ a measly non tow rated 265 ft-lb torque. Gotta use data to back the b.s.
Wanted more torque than 5.3 V8 and 2.7 Ecoboost. 2.7 I-4 dual volute Turbomax (w/ 5 yr 100,000 mile drivetrain warranty) makes 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. GM 5.3 V-8 makes 355 horse / 383 ft-lb torque @ 4,100 rpm. Ford 2.7 V-6 Ecoboost makes 325 horse / 400 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. The old Ford 3.3 was truly a slug - 290 horse / with disappointing 265 ft-lb torque @ 4,000 rpm, absolutely no competition to the turbomax. Glad 3.3 discontinued. Same w/ Ram 3.6 V-6 = 305 horse / 269 ft-lb torque @ 4,800 rpm.
Why bother testing fuel economy if you are literally just driving around the block?
Pick your poison....myself I've driven and owned a 2.7 Ecoboost, excellent all around engine.Im sure the Chevy is decent too
Same displacement but only one turbocharger. THATS the difference
Ford 2.7 twin turbo V-6= 325 horse / 410 ft-lb torque @ 4,250 rpm. GM 2.7 dual volute turbo I-4= 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Very comparable. One has 5 yr 100,000 drivetrain warranty.
correction - both make peak torque @ 3,000 rpm. GM 430 ft-lb. Ford - 400 ft-lb. That's the difference. Pay no attention number of cylinders or turbos. Dual volute turbomax makes the most torque numbers.
When you can’t afford the Ford you buy the Chevy
🤡
You guys don't have a clue about f150's
They suck in a wreck
Ask me how I know
Personal experience
Small motors and BIG prices. No thanks.
When you can’t afford a Ford, you buy a Chevy
🤡
No question, the Ford is much better. The 2.7 ecoboost is the most reliable one in the ecoboost line up, and the 10 speed is much more reliable and more efficient than the 8 speed in the chevy. These Chevy 2.7 fours also burn oil and sounds like a hummingbird fart ,and the gm 8 speed has had a LOT of issues. The only people who are buying these Chevys' are ones looking for the cheapest truck or blind brand loyalists who would buy a chevy even if it is a proven dumpster fire.
Chevy COULD have had a much better option in a smaller displacement turbo 3.6 variant and the 10 speed but they chose what they did.
The 2.7 chevy engine is not supposed to compete with 2.7 ecoboost as the chevy engine was a replacement for the base 4.3 v6. 2.7 ecoboost is comparable to the chevy 5.3.
the 2.7 is Ford's base engine. What do you want Ben Hardy to do?
GM Turbomax 310 horse/430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Ecoboost 325 horse / 400 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. The old 4.3 GM (285 horse / 305 ft-lb torque @ 3900 rpm) & Ford 3.3 (290 horse/265 ft-lb torque @ 4,000 rpm) were competitors. While numbers prove comparison, may as well list GM 5.3 - 355 horse / 383 ft-lb torque @ 4,100 rpm. Believe want you want, but facts/data are undisputable.
Ford won tis one but ram is better than ford hurricane
Thar hurricane is a junk engine
The hurricane is the Ram engine. Not Ford. Ford is the Ecoboost
GM's 2.7 is really meant to compete against Ford's 3.3 V6. That's why it replaced the 4.3 V6 that was previous the base engine in fleet trims. The 2.7 EB is a more powerful engine and will normally be cross-shopped with the 5.3. Even with the downsides of the oil pump belt behind the timing chains, plastic oil pan, and the EGR cooler, I would pick the 2.7 EB over the lower output GM 2.7T.
GMs uses an egr cooler on the 2.7 as well
Ford doesn't put the 3.3 engine in the F-150 anymore. The 2.7 is the base engine.
GM Turbomax 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Ecoboost 325 horse / 400 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Very comparable. GM 30 ft-lb more torque, but 15 less horse. Ford 3.3 was an absolute slug - 290 horse, but a terrible naturally aspirated 265 ft-lb torque @ 4,000 rpm. Shitty tow rating, doesn't even compete w/ turbomax.
@@redd7188 But it was when the 2.7T became the base engine. The 3.3 was the base engine until 2024. GM doesn't change engines every single year the way Ford does.
@@jmc6000 I don't see any reference to an EGR or EGR cooler in any documentation on the engine. I also don't see any parts, OEM or aftermarket, for an EGR valve or EGR cooler for the GM 2.7.
Why are you always struggling to get the trucks out of their parking sport? Why don't ya park em different or go the other way man? LOL
A moped has more rumble than the Chevy. 🤦🏻♂️
Neither! Like ever. 4 cylinder? Common Chevy.
The Chevy Custom kind of looks like a 2016 Raptor, a cheap one anyway. Come on Chevy, be better.
I love Chevy they need to upgrade their interior for the Turbo Max. I wouldn’t be caught dead in a Ford!
What is up with that steering wheel on the ford? Is that made out of plastic or something? It looks TERRIBLE.
The Chevy is horrible, I can't even find a reason to pick it. Are they do for an update anytime soon?
The Chevy sounds terrible, especially at startup.
Chevy sounds like a rice burner
Chevrolet silverado hands down