Would You Be Prepared to Defend Yourself... And Then Pay $68,500 (Or More) in Self-Defense Legal Bills Out-of-Pocket? Learn more about how the USCCA can help you in this EXACT situation >> uscca.co/27vM
This is good now! However, if, IF Democrats attempt to take the weapons (by force), a lot of people will be going to the cemetery, not to court. Most of my friends say they will go down in a pile of hot brass.
Just remember this if they’re comfortable coming out right of the gate saying they want to confiscate our firearms I’m pretty sure they’re going to rig the election. Nobody puts that out and expects a possibility to lose.
Minor but important point: We have to stop saying "gun buy back." The government CANNOT BUY BACK something it did not sell. I bought my guns from private businesses. If the government forces me to give up my guns with a small remuneration to me, I have not sold my guns to the government. The government has plainly taken them, no matter what they chose to give me in return. There is no such thing as "buy back." It's confiscation plain and simple.
@@reginaldsimms199 that's very difficult to get away with if the courts are honest. If the courts don't care about the 2A, then sure, they'll come up with a 1000 ways to confiscate
@@anthonyumphrey519You will have to begin as an individual, taking action on your own. Maybe at some point in the future you can be lucky enough to link up with other partisans, but for the time being, you fight alone. Read Louis Beam's _Leaderless Resistance._
If this actually goes down, you got a plan or something like defending your house from professional swat members or running deep to the countryside? Or you gonna do the thing where people talk about boats and guns😉
When engineered ammo shortages occur as well as taxing and regulating ammo companies so that they can’t sell ammo or components anymore to civilians, thats an easy anti gun strategy! Other then finding alternative tech i don’t think you can preserve 2a when ammo is curtailed! Gov can even stop copper and brass raw goods from reaching civilian 2a ammo companies and only allow federal or olin to use the materials to make ammo for gov acquisition only!
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
@@ethangifford1673think the scariest is when the line is drawn, how do we know it’s drawn?when do we do something? Where do we go? Who do we rebel against specifically? Who would be coming for us? Would us soldiers really turn on their neighbors? Do we stand with sherrifs? It would be a first in a very very long time. The answer to any of those questions are a bit chaotic.
I definitely don't blame anyone for preparing. The ones I shake my head at are the ones that say crap like they wish civil war would just kick off so we can get it over with. Those are the dumbasses that's probably never seen real bloodshed and only know what they've seen in movies. Just ask combat vets and first responders what people are capable of doing to each other. That's a level of savage that few in the USA have experienced or understand.
@DTAP17 Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
Having access to all guns to make people safe is also an "oxymoron". Did having over a hundred armed LEOs at Uvalde keep the children safe in their classroom from a mass shooter? There has to be common ground when it comes to the 2nd Amendment.
But yet they get guns to protect them and fences gates to protect them? Also criminals that have guns aren’t registered nor should they have them to begin with?😂😂 What they gonna do about that? That’s right nothing cause it’s the American people that’s their target they want to enslave us all and put us in re education camps whatever the hell that means!!?
@@JasonRector-nd4liwhat is she mentally crasy, thats impossible, there are 35million guns in this country not including the stash that our military has
While she cant legally, if something passes, the agencies will act while litigation takes its time. Look at the ATFs record with bump stocks, braces and FRTs. They moved FAST to swing that "authority" they think they have. There will need to be resistance before things can be stopped if she gets into that office and can act. We need to be more active in the community and push for people to vote, push for education on the history of of countries that have implemented such policies. One thing with that though is that we CANNOT be negative, we have to be willing to stay tame and have discussions if we wish to make progress on this matter. The moment we get violent, or show attitude, we drive away people that could potentially agree with us
A couple of months ago I told my wife.If the black SUV's pull up.Go outside I am not surrendering. My wife looked at me and smiled and said Honey, I'm staying here.I'm an american too.😊 I love her
Fredrick Douglas used it in a speech in 1865, but it was actually said in 1830 by……. Stephen Decatur Miller may have originated the concept during a speech at Stateburg, South Carolina, in September 1830. He said "There are three and only three ways to reform our Congressional legislation, familiarly called, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box". This became his campaign slogan in his successful bid for the Senate on a platform advocating the abolition of tariffs
@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303They already did! With the fiat currency printing press inflation tax on everything! Once enough people feel the pain...
@@JBmusicartwrong the Supreme Court has already ruled common use firearms are protected under the 2nd amendment! Ar15s are common use over 20 million 😂
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
FFL's are required to hand over records when they close the business. Only paper records can be disposed of after 20 years. Electronic ones must be kept forever until closure.
Why would you vote for a politician who dodges debate and has made no statements to describe what her policy agenda will be? We the people didnt get to choose her. We the people arent being allowed to know what she stands for. Hard pass America. Let the ruling class know your not to be mistreated
People who are voting for her are only voting for her black half or that she is a woman. Those people don't care about policy. This is why it doesn't matter.
She shouldn't have 20% approval. She says she is going to take one of you fundamental constitutional rights away and people are like "Take my rights! Take my rights!"
@@AllThingsFlightSim Anyone that thinks they'll be safe by surrendering their gun rights is stupid. But the average IQ is 100. We need to at least make the voting age 21.
Exactly! The govt doesn’t have money, that’s our money so basically if you give them your guns for money you bought your guns twice with nothing to show for. Why can’t the left understand this. 😡
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
They will...the 1st thing every Totalitarian throughout history has done is to disarm the citizenry. Majority rule Democracy & individual Liberty are not Compatible - Govt is an inherently coercive, inefficient, & wasteful monopolist of ultimate decisionmaking & violence...All history demonstrates this & simple logic proves it.
@@ozymandias2666This is the question I wonder about the most. Some say local LEOs. That won't last long until sheriffs eventually say they won't enforce. Some also say foreign entity and that has all kinds of bad written on it. Interesting to think about.
They will use an Executive Order to grant Naturalised Citizenship to ALL RESIDENT ILLEGAL ALIENS, DAYS BEFORE THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION then march them into Registration & Vote immediately after, telling them who to vote for, not understanding their right to choose (THE LESSOR OF THE TWO EVILS)!
Like it or not, America basically started because of gun control. Taxation was certainly an issue but it wasn’t until the red coats tried to disarm the colonist at Concord and Lexington and the colonist had enough and basically declared war on England with “The shot heard around the world”. The right to free speech may be the first Amendment, but the right of the People to keep and bear arms was the first actual right acknowledged and defended. And rights have no meaning unless one is willing and able to defend them. I once heard that when an American president talks gun control, the American people re-arm themselves… ya gotta love this country.
"To conquer a Nation, first disarm it's citizens." - Adolf Hitler 1933 "This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" - Adolf Hitler 1938 Oppressive regimes target civilian disarmament first because an armed populace is a check on tyranny.
Paying attention to them allowing open borders to let criminals in makes me feel that it is part of the plan for this purpose. When crime gets so bad that the people cry for help, they declare a state of emergency. Orders to kick in doors to find the criminals and seize weapons while doing so, starting in areas where there are known weapons that have been registered. Just my hypothesis anyway.
Yes. A state of emergency. Just like the gun confiscations of law abiding citizens during Hurricane Katrina in the 2000's. Cops confiscated guns from law abiding citizens, which made gang activity waaay worse. And then the 82 d airborne showed up.
@@furious_melons674 I will, thanks. I read a little excerpt and saw how Pete Buttigieg's family was tied to the Gramsci translations. This is very interesting.
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
Actually that's not true.. EO's serve as law and usually reference the laws they rely on to be able to do it. Now Congress can choose to not fund an Executive Order, as in the case of Trump's declarations of emergency EO's to stop extreme worldwide corruption & human trafficking, and another to confiscate the assets of people involved in those extreme heinous crimes. So yes they do serve under the power of law until they are retired.
If you don't go on the offense, you lose. A case needs to be brought to the USSC asking why a poll tax is illegal, why you can vote as you travel, and why you can't be treated equally for your right to keep and bear arms. The parallel is 100%, the court can't weasel out of it, but first, SOMEONE has to bring the argument before the court. Gentlemen?
I just wonder how many "supposed" gun owners will obey vs how many will not comply? Our founding fathers would be whipping all our butt's for what we have allowed our country to become!
@@jackmarston2515 We actually do. Put some thought behind it. As far as assets are concerned. Land, cars, the value of such things. Not many people will actually voluntarily give those things up to fight a war against other Americans ON American soil. Unless you are homeless and have none of those things, then maybe.
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
I wouldn't put it past the government to have your neighbors snitch on you. If you have a neighbor that has firearms you can turn them in and collect the cash reward if it leads to a conviction....something like $5,000.
You’re absolutely right. I was 12 years old when Marcos came to power and declared martial law in 1972. Almost immediately he shut down all media from printed to electronic. Then he came for our guns, knowing how much Filipinos love their firearms.
That's the case in effectively every nation with a disarmed population...violent crime using a different weapon skyrockets. Look at Japan (?) with the machete weilding dudes hacking 25+ people and nobodies able to stop them
It’s alarming how subtle and calculated these disarmament tactics are becoming. We need to stay vigilant and continue to defend our rights at every turn.
We did not forget the United States of America is a constitutional republic. We did not forget that the 10th amendment enshrines states with rights not granted to the federal government. We did not forget that the 2nd amendment grants the right to keep and bear arms. So, let’s see you march on Texas, Alabama, Montana, Oklahoma, etc. with your executive orders!
You realize that at least half of the states allow private sales right? They can only keep track of in store sales, they have no method of keeping track of private sales. That says nothing of 3D printing, and people who own lathes and cnc machines. You clearly aren't an owner though, or you'd know this stuff.
@@noktumwhatever753 and how was that purchased originally... from a dealer or store which ran the check and got the S/N and we can also make our own firearms with no S/N so whats your point
@@joshbissett1181 the point is if ATF came to you saying you bought a firearm (privately from Mr. Doe.) All you have to say is I sold that gun to a friend but can't remember which friend it was. Point being is private sales are most difficult to track.
@@ricks.1092 exactly its nun of their business we are in this position bc cowards comply or very ignorant of our freedoms or they are the enemy!, not calling you a coward I am just stating this and agreeing with you brother
This is why words matter they keep saying they want to reduce gun violence deaths, but all of their policies for gun control would just be trading in one type of crime for another.
Imagine an "atf" agency who solely attacked the First Amendment. Yet every single day they attack the second. It's ridiculous to its core. It's slapping the entire classrooms hand for one kid who always steals candy.
Executive orders do not create law that is binding upon the citizens. Executive orders can only apply to agencies and officials who are a part of the Executive Branch.
Correction on Kamalas statement at the beginning. Some congresssional members HAVE HAD THE COURAGE, to stand against unconstitutional legislation and executive actions.
The thing is with enough people who own guns there's no way. Even if she makes an executive action, supreme Court will throw it down on the ground and 30 seconds so it's just posturing.
Chief Justice John Robert's is already on record saying any such attempt would be tantamount to "adjudication through extortion." At which point the Court can rule to invalidate the appointments. They're not going to allow themselves (1/3 of government) to be weakened or stripped of power. Look for their reasoning to cite a violation of the "separation of powers" and "coequal branches" clauses of the Constitution.
So many arms owners not registered to vote in many many states…all need to register and vote…gun registry got to be abolished and get individuals working toward registration and confiscation as direct consequence with serious jail time…criminalize it resulting in long jail time…
Our forefathers had just come through a Revolutionary War with a tyrant in England and knew how important it was that the American citizen had the right to keep and bare arms for their personal freedom and liberty. They realized that gun ownership would and could stop a "Government" that was becoming like the King of England - Do as I say or you will be jailed. In America we have reached that point where politicians "THINK" they know more than we the people. My local Elected Sheriff of our county knows the oath he took to protect and defend the constitution and has told me personally that if ordered by the Governor or POTUS to confiscate firearms - his reply would be that he has more important things to do.
This is why Missouri Had made a law that any police either federal or city county or state can not in any way attempt to over ride the 2A or they will be arrested and prosecuted. It became illegal to come to our state and try to take guns. About 4-6 months ago our state was taken to court and the law may have suffered to some degree after that , I’m going to look it up now to see but every state needs to protect their citizens in this way
@@ddstanfield9259 yeh well your lucky you live in Missouri . I live in Minnesota which is basically the next california. (State where George floyd happend )
United Arms Organization For those who do not understand the meaning of ‘'Rights, we need to make it clear once and for all: The 2nd Amendment does not apply to semi-auto rifles, nor does it apply to bolt action rifles, pistols, or revolvers. The 2nd Amendment RESTRICTS GOVERNMENT. The technology of the firearm is irrelevant. The restrictions on government remain the same, regardless of the firearm. The Second Amendment was not written to grant permission for citizens to own and bear firearms. It forbids government interference in the right to keep and bear arms, period. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This also applies to the other 'Rights!. They are not granted, they stipulate inherent rights that the government may not prohibit." LAW OF THE LAND
Honestly, I don't really think she has to ban or try to ban outright. However, if the government imposes onerous taxes, requirements on persons and the gun industry at large, that discourages people from gun ownership.
Would You Be Prepared to Defend Yourself...
And Then Pay $68,500 (Or More) in Self-Defense Legal Bills Out-of-Pocket?
Learn more about how the USCCA can help you in this EXACT situation >> uscca.co/27vM
This is good now! However, if, IF Democrats attempt to take the weapons (by force), a lot of people will be going to the cemetery, not to court. Most of my friends say they will go down in a pile of hot brass.
@@ozymandias2666including myself. I will not play their games.
i will not comply with her admin or exec orders for collection
Only the Rich.
The self reliant on Themselve's can't.
I pra that this doesn't happened.
Just remember this if they’re comfortable coming out right of the gate saying they want to confiscate our firearms I’m pretty sure they’re going to rig the election. Nobody puts that out and expects a possibility to lose.
Minor but important point: We have to stop saying "gun buy back." The government CANNOT BUY BACK something it did not sell. I bought my guns from private businesses. If the government forces me to give up my guns with a small remuneration to me, I have not sold my guns to the government. The government has plainly taken them, no matter what they chose to give me in return. There is no such thing as "buy back." It's confiscation plain and simple.
My guns aren't for sale.
We don't say that anyway. We say confiscation.
Imminent Domain for guns?
@@reginaldsimms199 that's very difficult to get away with if the courts are honest. If the courts don't care about the 2A, then sure, they'll come up with a 1000 ways to confiscate
They definitely cannot "buy back" the 3D printed guns often sold at those events 😂
Every gun owner needs to stand up TOGETHER.
This will be the biggest weakness. Not only will most not stand up, it also won't be together.
We need to organize. How do we start?
@@anthonyumphrey519You will have to begin as an individual, taking action on your own. Maybe at some point in the future you can be lucky enough to link up with other partisans, but for the time being, you fight alone. Read Louis Beam's _Leaderless Resistance._
I got your 6
We need to form neighborhood militias.
Her executive orders have no power over me.
AMEN
You better be saying that with ammo and be ready to fight with your life on the line.
Correct. My index finger has MY power.
If this actually goes down, you got a plan or something like defending your house from professional swat members or running deep to the countryside? Or you gonna do the thing where people talk about boats and guns😉
When engineered ammo shortages occur as well as taxing and regulating ammo companies so that they can’t sell ammo or components anymore to civilians, thats an easy anti gun strategy! Other then finding alternative tech i don’t think you can preserve 2a when ammo is curtailed! Gov can even stop copper and brass raw goods from reaching civilian 2a ammo companies and only allow federal or olin to use the materials to make ammo for gov acquisition only!
I don't think the average person or even gun owner realizes just how terrifyingly close we are to seeing why the 2nd Amendment exists.
It’s scary, I’m young and even I see it and am preparing myself as much as I can
11:59…….thats how close! November probably tells the tale…
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
@@ethangifford1673think the scariest is when the line is drawn, how do we know it’s drawn?when do we do something? Where do we go? Who do we rebel against specifically? Who would be coming for us? Would us soldiers really turn on their neighbors? Do we stand with sherrifs? It would be a first in a very very long time. The answer to any of those questions are a bit chaotic.
I definitely don't blame anyone for preparing. The ones I shake my head at are the ones that say crap like they wish civil war would just kick off so we can get it over with. Those are the dumbasses that's probably never seen real bloodshed and only know what they've seen in movies. Just ask combat vets and first responders what people are capable of doing to each other. That's a level of savage that few in the USA have experienced or understand.
I will die on my feet rather than live on my knees. Come and take them.
81 million guns to take from me, so it will be a great labor
@@DTAP17 u will get ur chance
Amen!
@@Coleman77most people will get slowly boiled to the point of disarmament unfortunately. We all already do to a point if you really think about it
@DTAP17 Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
I don’t think most people realize how close we are to understanding the importance of the 2nd amendment
Prepare the best you can.! 🤔
Giving up guns to make people safe = oxymoron
Having access to all guns to make people safe is also an "oxymoron".
Did having over a hundred armed LEOs at Uvalde keep the children safe in their classroom from a mass shooter?
There has to be common ground when it comes to the 2nd Amendment.
But yet they get guns to protect them and fences gates to protect them?
Also criminals that have guns aren’t registered nor should they have them to begin with?😂😂
What they gonna do about that?
That’s right nothing cause it’s the American people that’s their target they want to enslave us all and put us in re education camps whatever the hell that means!!?
Just like the name Democratic Party is an oxymoron.
@MrfiX725 the only common ground we need is our motto "come and take it"
@@Drivin_Sideways Tell that to parents who lost their children at Sandy Hook, Stonemason Douglas or Uvalde.
Its gonna be another 1776 if she tries
hopefully or else we will not get our rights back
@@JasonRector-nd4li legally harris cant, its in the 2nd amendment...and im armed as well
@@JasonRector-nd4liwhat is she mentally crasy, thats impossible, there are 35million guns in this country not including the stash that our military has
@@sixpapavictordemocrats do a lot of illegal stuff.
While she cant legally, if something passes, the agencies will act while litigation takes its time. Look at the ATFs record with bump stocks, braces and FRTs. They moved FAST to swing that "authority" they think they have. There will need to be resistance before things can be stopped if she gets into that office and can act. We need to be more active in the community and push for people to vote, push for education on the history of of countries that have implemented such policies. One thing with that though is that we CANNOT be negative, we have to be willing to stay tame and have discussions if we wish to make progress on this matter. The moment we get violent, or show attitude, we drive away people that could potentially agree with us
A couple of months ago I told my wife.If the black SUV's pull up.Go outside I am not surrendering. My
wife looked at me and smiled and said Honey, I'm staying here.I'm an american too.😊 I love her
Keep her. Make certain she can use any and all of the "tools" you have available. Love like this is precious.
Absolutely fabulous!!!
You won’t see the SUVs show up and won’t even have the chance to have that conversation 😂
Excellent answer bro! You have a keeper!!
I told my wife the same thing
A MAN'S RIGHTS REST IN THREE BOXES: THE BALLOT BOX, THE JURY BOX, AND THE CARTRIDGE BOX.
FREDERICK DOUGLASS
Fredrick Douglas used it in a speech in 1865, but it was actually said in 1830 by……. Stephen Decatur Miller may have originated the concept during a speech at Stateburg, South Carolina, in September 1830. He said "There are three and only three ways to reform our Congressional legislation, familiarly called, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box". This became his campaign slogan in his successful bid for the Senate on a platform advocating the abolition of tariffs
Well said squire
Negative, George! As long as they don't raise the tax on imported tea, i don't care what happens!🏌🏽♂️
@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303They already did! With the fiat currency printing press inflation tax on everything! Once enough people feel the pain...
Her executive action will not trump my constitutional right.
Your constitutional right comes with conditions.
@@JBmusicartwrong the Supreme Court has already ruled common use firearms are protected under the 2nd amendment! Ar15s are common use over 20 million 😂
@@JBmusicart No the 2nd amendment covers all guns not just muskets.
Yup, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. That's an important condition. @JBmusicart
@@zachisback4492 ok, professor pisshead
The mere fact that she plans on doing executive action on firearms is SCARY. Never fold. That is what THEY want.
Biden already told that idiot that she can't do it. It's unconstitutional.
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
I was informed by my local FFL that the government already knows who has guns. So the registration part is already in effect
FFL's are required to hand over records when they close the business. Only paper records can be disposed of after 20 years. Electronic ones must be kept forever until closure.
@@KBoonthey already know ever gun you have.
unlawful evidence cannot hold up in court,
They know that you have a gun. They don’t know what it specifically is without the FFLs paperwork.
They have no record of the private sale of that firearm after you bought it.
I’ve told my family be ready to see their grandfather in jail at 70. I am ready.
I told my kids pretty much the same. One daughter told me she really expected me and several others in the morgue.
I told my brother the same and he thinks im insane
I’m with ya brother!
I ain't going to jail or prison. Only one way to valhalla
@@WhiteTrashTennesseeexactly if this really happens no way in hell is anyone going to put handcuffs on me I am going to fight my ass off till the end
They will not, and I repeat, they will not disarm us. Never ever ever.
They’re trying to stir up pandemonium, because anticipating a woman president hits different.
They may try until they start counting the bodies of those they command to do so!
@@ronald209cool your jets. No one is going to be taking your sex toys. You and I both know it is not an option.
@@ronald209you think the powers that be care at all about a number of bodies ??
There is a huge difference between taking guns and TRYING to take guns.
Why would you vote for a politician who dodges debate and has made no statements to describe what her policy agenda will be? We the people didnt get to choose her. We the people arent being allowed to know what she stands for. Hard pass America. Let the ruling class know your not to be mistreated
Your vote dosent matter haven't you been watching? 😊
People who are voting for her are only voting for her black half or that she is a woman. Those people don't care about policy. This is why it doesn't matter.
@@driftitlikeyouownityes so stay home and give them your nuts on a silver platter. What a stupid comment. Vote or you'll wish you did.
Because those people believe their “right” to kill unborn children is more important than any other right you may have, including 2A.
the hivemind has delayed an answer
Every time she speaks in front of the press it looks like someone pushed her into cold water
She shouldn't have 20% approval. She says she is going to take one of you fundamental constitutional rights away and people are like "Take my rights! Take my rights!"
She's got enuff neck meat to make two saddles
I really think she's drunk all the time
@@Clearanceman2 They think it'll make them safe... Little do they know
@@AllThingsFlightSim Anyone that thinks they'll be safe by surrendering their gun rights is stupid. But the average IQ is 100. We need to at least make the voting age 21.
The government didn't own them, so not a buy back. Also they use your taxes to pay for your guns, you are basically paying them to take the guns.
Exactly! The govt doesn’t have money, that’s our money so basically if you give them your guns for money you bought your guns twice with nothing to show for. Why can’t the left understand this. 😡
America protect our 2A 🇺🇸🇺🇸
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
Vote RED 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️
She doesn't have the manpower to pull off confiscation.
Come and take it 💪🏽
I'm with you brother.
They will...the 1st thing every Totalitarian throughout history has done is to disarm the citizenry. Majority rule Democracy & individual Liberty are not Compatible - Govt is an inherently coercive, inefficient, & wasteful monopolist of ultimate decisionmaking & violence...All history demonstrates this & simple logic proves it.
They will
Begs the question, WHO is actually going to come to your door and demand your weapons?
@@ozymandias2666This is the question I wonder about the most. Some say local LEOs. That won't last long until sheriffs eventually say they won't enforce. Some also say foreign entity and that has all kinds of bad written on it. Interesting to think about.
Executive order is for government, not for the People.
They will use an Executive Order to grant Naturalised Citizenship to ALL RESIDENT ILLEGAL ALIENS, DAYS BEFORE THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION then march them into Registration & Vote immediately after, telling them who to vote for, not understanding their right to choose (THE LESSOR OF THE TWO EVILS)!
You don't see violations of the constitution as a criminal act?
THEY ARE TRAITORS...THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION...OR YOUR RIGHTS...WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP VOTING THESE TRAITORS INTO OFFICE...MAKES NO SENSE
an armed society is a polite society...
Honest would be better... psychos thrive on politeness after all polite makes right.
The problem is crazy people.not the guns @@arib515
Welcome to the Silver Rush
Most people in this country have no idea what's going on in Venezuela
that's by design
Yep and that is sad! We are becoming more like them every day. Wake up people!
@@hrtmike17 angels are awake man and know whats going on I am others are being hunted and silenced
Like it or not, America basically started because of gun control. Taxation was certainly an issue but it wasn’t until the red coats tried to disarm the colonist at Concord and Lexington and the colonist had enough and basically declared war on England with “The shot heard around the world”. The right to free speech may be the first Amendment, but the right of the People to keep and bear arms was the first actual right acknowledged and defended. And rights have no meaning unless one is willing and able to defend them. I once heard that when an American president talks gun control, the American people re-arm themselves… ya gotta love this country.
"To conquer a Nation, first disarm it's citizens." - Adolf Hitler 1933
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" - Adolf Hitler 1938
Oppressive regimes target civilian disarmament first because an armed populace is a check on tyranny.
And all the Communist Countries before and after
Paying attention to them allowing open borders to let criminals in makes me feel that it is part of the plan for this purpose. When crime gets so bad that the people cry for help, they declare a state of emergency. Orders to kick in doors to find the criminals and seize weapons while doing so, starting in areas where there are known weapons that have been registered. Just my hypothesis anyway.
Yes. A state of emergency. Just like the gun confiscations of law abiding citizens during Hurricane Katrina in the 2000's. Cops confiscated guns from law abiding citizens, which made gang activity waaay worse. And then the 82 d airborne showed up.
100%
Nonsense…!
@@furious_melons674 I will, thanks. I read a little excerpt and saw how Pete Buttigieg's family was tied to the Gramsci translations. This is very interesting.
@@James-ol6rw stuff it , bot boy
Executive order is not a law. Congress has to pass a law.
and cant trust them
executive order by a installed person will go ignored
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
@@Coleman77that basically means everything that’s been passed since 2021….
Actually that's not true.. EO's serve as law and usually reference the laws they rely on to be able to do it. Now Congress can choose to not fund an Executive Order, as in the case of Trump's declarations of emergency EO's to stop extreme worldwide corruption & human trafficking, and another to confiscate the assets of people involved in those extreme heinous crimes. So yes they do serve under the power of law until they are retired.
Theyre gonna be really shocked w the amount of room temperature cops if they try door to door confiscation 🤷♂️
They will not disarm me during my lifetime!!!
If you don't go on the offense, you lose.
A case needs to be brought to the USSC asking why a poll tax is illegal, why you can vote as you travel, and why you can't be treated equally for your right to keep and bear arms.
The parallel is 100%, the court can't weasel out of it, but first, SOMEONE has to bring the argument before the court.
Gentlemen?
I just wonder how many "supposed" gun owners will obey vs how many will not comply? Our founding fathers would be whipping all our butt's for what we have allowed our country to become!
Most will comply. After the government makes an example out of some big names many more will comply.
I WILL NOT COMPLY. LET’S DANCE🤨
@@NANA-lq5md You are 100% correct. We have so much more to lose than our Founding Fathers.
@@witchdoc5075no you don't. Once your freedom is gone your standard of living will be less than that regardless of available technology or year.
@@jackmarston2515 We actually do. Put some thought behind it. As far as assets are concerned. Land, cars, the value of such things. Not many people will actually voluntarily give those things up to fight a war against other Americans ON American soil. Unless you are homeless and have none of those things, then maybe.
Congress doesn't have the authority to override the constitution. Neither does she.
Without 2A we wont have ANY rights.
None at all.
Like they said you'll have nothing and be happy. I say different
The tree of liberty is thirsty patriots... And voting wont get us out of this.
Than whats gonna get us out of this, violence?
@@SLIM-SH8Yrevolution
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
@@jackyates1001😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@SLIM-SH8Y 1776
Legislation, registration, confiscation....that the plan, always, goodbye 2A rights
I wouldn't put it past the government to have your neighbors snitch on you. If you have a neighbor that has firearms you can turn them in and collect the cash reward if it leads to a conviction....something like $5,000.
Sounds like a red flag law with a reward.
Absolutely, haven't a few states already done something like that.
You mean like Gov. Walz did for covid when he created a snitch line .
Funerals cost more than $5000.
A lot of us live in rural area's though, so good luck with that.
I have 438 grains that says they're not taking anything. GROW A PAIR PEOPLE!!
At the end of the day, law abiding citizens aren't the issue.
She can, pound sand!
Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun
That’s what all these past and present tyrants know; they know it well.
Im a 64 year old widower with no kids . I'm not giving up my guns , I'm not going to jail .
71 and right there with you brother.
As I remember being taught in high school. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
"Shall not be infringed" applies to the complete Constitution not just the 2nd Amendment!
Tossing the bill rights has always been the end goal, along with absolute power
The second that we lose our guns, it's over.
The only effective way they will disarm me is to take my life.
Nec Aspera Terrent
There's already a defacto registration. It's the 4473.
IF YOU WANT MINE, YOU BETTER BRING YOURS!!
You’re absolutely right. I was 12 years old when Marcos came to power and declared martial law in 1972. Almost immediately he shut down all media from printed to electronic. Then he came for our guns, knowing how much Filipinos love their firearms.
I guess she forgets that these representatives are suppose to represent their constituents not the government.
Now you know the meaning of the words FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT! Its coming folks - PARA BELLUM!
We do not need a Kamaltoe admin.
We will not comply.
You already have been for years
When I was stationed in England, there was an increase in strong arm robberies.
That's the case in effectively every nation with a disarmed population...violent crime using a different weapon skyrockets. Look at Japan (?) with the machete weilding dudes hacking 25+ people and nobodies able to stop them
UNITED we stand DIVIDED we fall…. 🇺🇸
I will not comply
Nope
Over my cold dead hands!!!!
@@xxwickedtryhardxx1686 right on!
People need to come to an agreement with their communities when this starts to happen the people will back each other up.
It’s alarming how subtle and calculated these disarmament tactics are becoming. We need to stay vigilant and continue to defend our rights at every turn.
Don’t compare us to Canada. They have no 2nd amendment. We do.
Look what they did to the protesting, peaceful truckers. Canada is horrible now, just like UK.
We did not forget the United States of America is a constitutional republic. We did not forget that the 10th amendment enshrines states with rights not granted to the federal government. We did not forget that the 2nd amendment grants the right to keep and bear arms. So, let’s see you march on Texas, Alabama, Montana, Oklahoma, etc. with your executive orders!
19 April 1775 is what will happen if they come to take OUR RIGHTS!!
She’s definitely putting the cart before the horse.
Start in Texas. Come here and see how it goes?
It they start in Texas, it will end in Texas.
Texas will easily, EASILY defeat any attempt by feds to disarm the public. Count on it.
@@riboflavinfolate3964What about Austin?
I'll be an outlaw and proud of it.
FFLs and state Republican/conservative groups need to do more to collaborate on registering voters.
They better be as passionate about taking him as I am about keeping them
Anyone who thinks that a registry doesn’t exist is a fool other wise we have no reason to include S/N on the background check form no reason at all
You realize that at least half of the states allow private sales right? They can only keep track of in store sales, they have no method of keeping track of private sales. That says nothing of 3D printing, and people who own lathes and cnc machines. You clearly aren't an owner though, or you'd know this stuff.
@@noktumwhatever753 and how was that purchased originally... from a dealer or store which ran the check and got the S/N and we can also make our own firearms with no S/N so whats your point
@@noktumwhatever753 and why are you replying to me on another topic all i said was they already have a registry
@@joshbissett1181 the point is if ATF came to you saying you bought a firearm (privately from Mr. Doe.) All you have to say is I sold that gun to a friend but can't remember which friend it was. Point being is private sales are most difficult to track.
@@ricks.1092 exactly its nun of their business we are in this position bc cowards comply or very ignorant of our freedoms or they are the enemy!, not calling you a coward I am just stating this and agreeing with you brother
Maybe I'm wrong but executive action DOES NOT supersede Constitutional rights.
Nor does it affect civilians. Only federal employees. So if she wants to disarm the feds, go for it.
“The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant.”
- Maximilien Robespierre
Lots of Americans will not comply.
This is why words matter they keep saying they want to reduce gun violence deaths, but all of their policies for gun control would just be trading in one type of crime for another.
Imagine an "atf" agency who solely attacked the First Amendment. Yet every single day they attack the second. It's ridiculous to its core. It's slapping the entire classrooms hand for one kid who always steals candy.
They also want a watchdog agency(s) to censor speech, prevent assembly, control the press, and suppress religion, particularly Christianity.
Executive orders do not create law that is binding upon the citizens. Executive orders can only apply to agencies and officials who are a part of the Executive Branch.
Just became a member this week, these videos are excellent!
Glad you like them! Thanks for your support!
I don’t ’litigate’…it’s a family tradition since April 19, 1775 when Uncle Petrus met the British in Concord
Commyla IS INSANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
When Kamala removes guns from her security team and her self and house then maybe we can think about it.
Not even then FKH
The US will Balkanize.
yes we will 0/
5:05 It’s important to note whose is performing all the knife crime. Weird how certain groups behave no matter the laws huh
The British tried to take the colonist guns at Lexington .
Correction on Kamalas statement at the beginning. Some congresssional members HAVE HAD THE COURAGE, to stand against unconstitutional legislation and executive actions.
The thing is with enough people who own guns there's no way. Even if she makes an executive action, supreme Court will throw it down on the ground and 30 seconds so it's just posturing.
Keep lying to yourself… they’ve been taking guns for years now (via redflag style laws mainly) and nobody has done anything about it.
maybe but in the meantime until a descision they will get midevil
Unfortunately this process takes years. Look at the arbitrary bump stock ban. It JUST got overturned, years later.
@@witchdoc5075this would be a bit more severe than that. I think the court would act faster.
i will stand in the way
God forbid cackles becomes our president. 😱
FROM MY COLD DEAD HAND ! ! ! ! !
They'll pack the court before they try to confiscate
Chief Justice John Robert's is already on record saying any such attempt would be tantamount to "adjudication through extortion." At which point the Court can rule to invalidate the appointments. They're not going to allow themselves (1/3 of government) to be weakened or stripped of power. Look for their reasoning to cite a violation of the "separation of powers" and "coequal branches" clauses of the Constitution.
So many arms owners not registered to vote in many many states…all need to register and vote…gun registry got to be abolished and get individuals working toward registration and confiscation as direct consequence with serious jail time…criminalize it resulting in long jail time…
God didn't give you rights to have them taken away.
As Anakin Skywalker once said.. "You will try.."
And then he lost his arms and legs! 😂
@aquariumdude7829 well yeah he did lol
But it's only cause he got overconfident with the whole high to low ground situation. A good lesson lol
Our forefathers had just come through a Revolutionary War with a tyrant in England and knew how important it was that the American citizen had the right to keep and bare arms for their personal freedom and liberty. They realized that gun ownership would and could stop a "Government" that was becoming like the King of England - Do as I say or you will be jailed. In America we have reached that point where politicians "THINK" they know more than we the people. My local Elected Sheriff of our county knows the oath he took to protect and defend the constitution and has told me personally that if ordered by the Governor or POTUS to confiscate firearms - his reply would be that he has more important things to do.
Any cop that attempts to arrest any gun owner isn’t a cop in my book
This is why Missouri Had made a law that any police either federal or city county or state can not in any way attempt to over ride the 2A or they will be arrested and prosecuted. It became illegal to come to our state and try to take guns. About 4-6 months ago our state was taken to court and the law may have suffered to some degree after that , I’m going to look it up now to see but every state needs to protect their citizens in this way
@@ddstanfield9259 yeh well your lucky you live in Missouri . I live in Minnesota which is basically the next california. (State where George floyd happend )
Don't think any cops would want anything to do with it.
@@InfaredAffliction yeah Outside of Minneapolis I can’t understand the socialist attitude
@@ddstanfield9259 Minneapolis is the only blue area in the state lmao Minnesota really red
This would end in bloodshed.
Yes we need action, criminals need to go to jail and stay, not be catch and release like fishing.
Darn that pesky Constitution right DB.
United Arms Organization
For those who do not understand the meaning of ‘'Rights, we need to make it clear once and for all: The 2nd Amendment does not apply to semi-auto rifles, nor does it apply to bolt action rifles, pistols, or revolvers. The 2nd Amendment RESTRICTS GOVERNMENT. The technology of the firearm is irrelevant.
The restrictions on government remain the same, regardless of the firearm. The Second Amendment was not written to grant permission for citizens to own and bear firearms. It forbids government interference in the right to keep and bear arms, period.
The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This also applies to the other 'Rights!.
They are not granted, they stipulate inherent rights that the government may not prohibit."
LAW OF THE LAND
She will use Executive Orders
As the world descends into chaos , the Constitution gets stronger and more important as time goes on 🇺🇸
@@deebee4575
That is a good joke 😂🤣😂
@@deebee4575 Executive Orders don’t supersede the Constitution. Try and get with the program.
This is ASSuming Trump is not in. Keep the faith and vote!
Honestly, I don't really think she has to ban or try to ban outright. However, if the government imposes onerous taxes, requirements on persons and the gun industry at large, that discourages people from gun ownership.