Someone Wants The Camera Industry GONE
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- The slow camera evolution. Why does it take so long, and are we even headed in the right direction?
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a kangaroo will take it to his family and they will film a documentary.
Canon R8 amzn.to/47Hp8S6
Canon 24mm f1.4 amzn.to/47Ob1dS
Canon 85mm f1.2 amzn.to/3S5nVOt
Sony A7S III amzn.to/48uuilz
Zeiss 55mm f1.8 amzn.to/3U41dZI
Nikon Z30 amzn.to/3S5mYG1
Nikkor 40mm f2 amzn.to/42k80Rr
BMPCC OG (links are in your old Sears catalogue at your grandma's house)
Leica 25mm f1.4 amzn.to/48DTGoX
Instagram / vegetablepolice
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com...
Topaz Video AI for enhancing and slowing down footage! www.topazlabs....
Remove Mucoid Plaque in 1 DAY! zencleanz.com/...
Patreon for Monthly Q&A Videos / vegetablepolice
T-shirts and merch! vegetablepolic...
My Monkey Strength ebook payhip.com/b/VyEG
My Music from videos! Entire Discography 15% off vegetablepolic...
Random ass donations to paypal.me/vegetablepolice Thank you!
Q-Link Products changed my life! share.shopqlin...
My Health Channel Vegetable Police / @vegetablepolice
My MMA channel UFC Conspiracies / @ufcconspiracies
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a kangaroo will take it to his family and they will film a documentary.
Canon R8 amzn.to/47Hp8S6
Canon 24mm f1.4 amzn.to/47Ob1dS
Canon 85mm f1.2 amzn.to/3S5nVOt
Sony A7S III amzn.to/48uuilz
Zeiss 55mm f1.8 amzn.to/3U41dZI
Nikon Z30 amzn.to/3S5mYG1
Nikkor 40mm f2 amzn.to/42k80Rr
BMPCC OG (links are in your old Sears catalogue at your grandma's house)
Leica 25mm f1.4 amzn.to/48DTGoX
Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Topaz Video AI for enhancing and slowing down footage! www.topazlabs.com/topaz-video-ai/ref/1640/
I literally just bought a Tamron 24-70 LOL 7:14 Feels bad man... It's all I could afford and I bought it used.. But it gets worse, it's for MFT hahahhaa
Ironically, the guy who jokes the most and appears least serious of all camera reviewers at the surface, has the best intrinsic industry overview at large. Another reference video that goes into history. You Kasey are the only one who sees the forest, all the other see the trees only and are half-hypnotized by the manufacturers marketing hype.
Man, I don’t even know what you’re talking about. Numbers and millimeters and the like, but I sit here glued to the screen watching, listening and laughing! I literally walk around singing that song you use at the start of your videos! Just for context, I’m a grown man, a father, a grandfather, an airline pilot, for United for goodness sake! I’m walking around Tokyo singing that song! Yes you’re one of my favorite RUclipsrs! Love it!
…..All I want is the Perfect Cam-er-a, all I want is the perfect Cam-er-a….
I'm just going to watch this channel for 10 years and never buy a camera just like I watch PC building videos and never build a PC.
Lol with addition of graphics cards lol me too 😅
Lol worked for me with Skyrim.
Welcome brother. This is our swamp!
You should start your own beverage company. Healthy energy drinks for filmmakers. You can call it 3D-Pop. 😂
Genius 😂
And cripple Hammers
GET OUT!
@@krakapoww3D Pop and the Cripple Hammers is an excellent prog rock band name.
Your timewarp on the scooter really highlights the inefficiency of cars. It's a beautiful thing to behold.
I am so surprised that CC has not reached 1 million or even 500K subs? The information, the experience and down to earth presentation of the struggles of an everyday vlogger/cinematographer is priceless! The Nikon and BMPCC are wonderfully enjoyable to watch. As for the glimmer glass, I think it does effect the 3D pop. Thanks for sharing your wisdom!
life... did you know that more than 90% of businesses fail. More than 80% of child baring relationships fail... the chance of popularity is in there some where.
Not trying to be mean, but I've tried to watch plenty of his videos, but it's hard to finish any of them. I've only probably made it to the end for a single video, and that was the RF 24mm review. His style just doesn't resonate with me at all.
It's an acquired taste :D
and yet I managed to read your whole message....@@Augnos
Your airport story was funny. It reminded me of a trip to Tokyo where I had to change planes to fly to Fukuoka. I was told at the information desk to get on bus #2 and it would take me to the terminal. I got on the bus, watched it depart the airport, and then drove around town before returning to the same place I got on. I then ran with all of my luggage in hand where I barely made my connecting flight on time.
This has to be one of the best produced Camera Conspiracy videos, Kasey looks the best he ever has and everything is tac sharp! Keep it up!
Ahhh...the Canon "Nifty Fifty" kit lens. Yes, it had it's shortcomings but for the money it was the shizzle in it's day.
Speaking of dim lenses, consider Canon's "RF600mm F11 IS STM". No, f11 is not a joke, it is really an f11 lens. This lens is for those who would like to imagine what life would be like if we all lived in caves and never emerged. Enjoy your 32000 ISO setting. The ten second exposures will force us to kill, stuff, and mount anything we want to film. But hey, a revival of the taxidermy profession. If we want it to move, we can do the "claymation" sort of thingy.
P.S. Lens Hood ET-101, SKU, 3989C001, $68.00 if you want to control the lens flares.
I think no glimmer glass looks better for talking heads unless you are trying to drive *mood* with atmosphere, ambience, whatever you want to call it. Looks better outdoors also.
Glimmerglass is unusable outdoors in bright daylight imo. I use black satin 1/4 for talking heads but watch out for bright lights, that filter is crazy with the ghosting or whatever it's called.
All mist = KFC glass
@@frostgodx but it's finger lickin good
I like using industry labs cinema mist filters. Really subtle and smooth looking.
OMG havent laughed this hard in long time thank you
Fucking Loved It!!!!!!!! Subscribed!!!!
Seriously one of my favorite channels because of your straight-up authenticity - both in your presentation of information and experience but also your personality. Im so sick of seeing the same RUclipsr/Influencer personality get copied and pasted and hearing the same high pitched semi yelling voices telling the same type of "jokes" over and over again. Its refreshing seeing someone make high-quality content with a completely unique presentation and no social media influencer exaggeration for views and retention.
KUALA LUMPUR MENTIONED 🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥
man even as a born and bred Malaysian i have to use the GPS to move around the city lmao.
Love how you ditched the cops @7:55 with that unscheduled RH turn. Also love the Z30 with the 12-28 PZ. That combo gives you a massive amount of option when shooting off a gimble or slider [at some point you'll stop being a Ludite --maybe]. ProTip: Add the Nikon remote and SmallRig "Tripod" [which holds the remote] and you have cinema magic at your fingers my friend.
Can’t get myself to carry around a gimbal for the z30 😢
I don’t often agree with you so strongly, but this time I do. Yes the camera industry, like others, changes just for the sake of change rather than shooting for target that they know want and love. It would be nice if users controled the show, but accountants do.
I have no idea how long it takes to develop a lens, but it's also not advantageous for them to release everything at once and then nothing for 2-3 years. If *insert camera brand* releases 6 lenses at the same time, people talk about them once, specialty press publishes one article, reviewers do one video etc. then they are "forgotten" until the next release. If they release one lens now, another in 6 months and so on, they are in the news cycle much more often; that's free advertising and it drives sales.
"I have a hair on my tongue. Its an eyelash, i think." Lool
Are you a pedo or what, your channel is weird
I love how half of the Nikon review was saying how Canon lenses suck. Nikon kit zooms are so good that I have about five of them (F mount though).
I loved the micro 4/3 video game catapult. 🎉
I remember when I jumped from the 5D mk3 to the Sony AzSii many years ago. The “quality” of footage was technically much better, but it lost that “look” that the canon had. And not just the colours. I agree with your comment about lack of personality on Sony lenses
A7sii dammit
The lack of personality applies to totl lenses, like Sony GM or Sigma Art. It's because they have too many glass elements to correct for every optical defect. This causes the image to look clean, sharp and flat across the frame, i.e. clinical. Older lenses or cheaper lenses aren't so corrected and they have more character.
I wanna work at that Panasonic factory. Looks fun.
Riding that little scooter in traffic. wowza
Panasonic is going to release S1Hmk2 soon ... rumor says it will have internal ND.
Em 5:30 I kinda like that orangy sky time lapse for a videoclip.
Yeah, more pop without glimmer glass. I learned so much from you it's ridiculous. The canon 85mm pops good. Photo-centric cameras are screwed when the Hasselblald Oppo phones catch on
It looks great but the sims don't work in North America.
@@flightographist true but I think it's only a matter of time before they get Americanized. I like the form of cameras but the tech lags badly.
When I watch a Zoomer take a hi-res photo, process it and then post it to social media in less than 20 seconds I feel like a dinosaur.
For the same results I'm carrying a camera thats too big for a pocket, then accessing and booting up my laptop (after I get home) and transferring the file from the sd card, processing in DxO photolab and then posting. All the while I'm carrying a phone anyway.
The only advantages of using a camera now are dynamic range and optical zoom quality, but phones are catching up because that's where the money is
I think there will always be a difference, that Hass comes close but it and what follow will only really appeal to the instant gratification crowd. @@YouSnoozeYouNooze
Back when I shot with a Nikon F body, I had a Tamron 80-210mm zoom. Not a favorite, but workable for certain events. My best shots were always with my 135mm prime. Body and prime lens purchased in a garage sale for $5.
the only thing i don't like about dji pocket 3 is that activation thing.
Lol, just make fake accounts. Activate once and done
trust children to lnow the workarounds@@trym2121
Given the web or grid like manner in which we are identified and tracked, fake accounts are merely incomplete but not untraceable, not even automatically.
.....on that bus......Sometimes I think I drive that bus.
I think the latern looks way better.
Those JBLs are dynamite
DJI needs to take the guts of the Pocket 3 and make a compact bridge camera with it. Imagine a Pocket with optical zoom. That would be the thing that actually kills your channel.
I disagree everytime you refer to low element count lenses as automatically having 3d pop. Unless you are being sarcastic about that too ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ It's like you read Yannick Khong's blog and just bit down hard on it. Your proclaimed masters of pop (Zeiss) have the best of the best in the Otus series for pop. 28mm f1.4, 16 elements in 13 groups. Have a look at the images from that lens. It is like the definition of pop. Nevermind that it's manual focus blah blah. Unimportant. I am only disputing that low element count lenses = pop; it doesn't. Also there are zooms that also have it. I think you need to judge each lens based on it respective resulting images not element count. I do agree a lot of new lenses look sterile but it is not related to element count, more that this is the design they think people want for technical cleanliness.
I never said that, it just so happens a lot of 3D pop lenses have low element counts.
3D pop is many things, not one thing. Some lenses with few elements lack 3D pop. Some lenses wirh many elements have 3D pop. Some lenses only have 3D pop at certain settings or when paired with certain sensors. The only way to determine if a lens has 3D pop is to look at the pictures, not the specs.
Or perhaps he read the Photography Life piece on 3D Pop and missed the last paragraph.
3D Pop Pigeons...DOA
After years of hearing you say “Toneh 1.4” or “Toneh 2” etc, I think my brain is almost trying to refer to bokeh as toneh. It’s a slow process of subliminally retraining my brain, but it’s happening - and it’s all because of you. Someday, the term “toneh” will appear on Wikipedia, and it will officially replace “bokeh” for the photographers of our future…lol
No glimmer glass is better. Minimalism>filters.
4:21 ok, seeing that thing I (might) have a great idea: get an IKEA Regolit lamp shade! It's an easily foldable white and round paper lamp shade. Costs about the same as a bad cup of coffee and might actually look at home in the apartment
The M4/3 factory scene is hilarious!!!
Lantern looks much better than bounced.. Your face is much more three-dimensional, more tonal differences. Bounced looks flat
Ok, so I wasn’t crazy after all, thinking that the Nikon Z50 was better than every camera out there, including the A7siii!
Kuala Lumpur story is so relatable lol. Same experience. Lots of winding roads and intersections and tunnels, feels like a mouse in a maze. 😅
Yea, impossible to walk to your destination. The roads never lead to where you think they will lol.
I feel like if every company did cheaper little lenses, like a 24mm t2.8, with a more vintage touch, I'd be so happy
The problem is online lens testing reviews that pick out all optical flaws in new lenses. It makes it difficult to make and sell old-school lenses. The old-school lenses were designed for film or low-resolution digital sensors that were much more forgiving than modern sensors.
Yes! Why were little point and shoot film cameras lenses so tiny and still bright but today even small lenses are pretty big.
I love my big sigma art primes but I'd also love a little lens like you described, with character that I can take with me daily for my general life photos.
@@definingslawek4731 Film is more forgiving of optical defects than digital sensors. Large digital highres sensors are very revealing of optical flaws, so that's when the design philosophy for lenses changed to large lenses with many corrective elements.
Yeah! Exactly why I sold my Nikon & Sony bodies with Nikon & Tamron lenses and turned to the DJI Osmo Action 4. I sleep better knowing I'm not blowing all those $$ on lenses with the many flaws you mention. And I'm having more fun filming with less complicated gear. What are the specs on the Action 4 $80 lens? I no longer care. But I still love your videos!
Hilarious rant. I'm waiting for Sony to bring out the RX10 Mark V superzoom bridge camera, which will be even more overpriced. The Mark IV is like 6 years old! The camera industry moves at a snails pace. As long as the current model is still selling, companies ars not compelled to update.
Panasonic just released the 100mm macro like last month dude.
what’s the general consensus of the Sony FE 50mm Fony 1.8?
All I ever wanted was a C100 Mk 3 with 240. Instead, I have to wait for the mirrorless crap to go down the drain. The unfortunate bit is Sony was so close with the FS5; all they had to do was put the damn autofocus in it.
the cat sound 3d popped
OMG, your scooter hyperlapse is going to give me a heart attack. LOL When the car door opened up... that's my nightmare.
Can’t wait to see the Nikon z6 iii. 🐒 High hopes and also very afraid of the mimic monkeys. 🙊
No
It's like they all make lenses randomly, measure them after the fact, then name them based on whatever it turns out to be. Doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason or obvious transitions. Nikon's two kit lenses make sense, then they leave you hanging at 250. They're like if you want more zoom than the naked eye, gonna have to pony up more than the entire two lens kit, they didn't continue the kit lenses into actual zoom range and the teleconverters don't work with the kit lenses.
I'm waiting so hard for the right video centric body from Nikon!! Then I will sell everything and go back to where I started ❤️ NIKON.
Hyper laspes need tighter frames. No matter what you will always go Star Trek warp speed when it's that wide.
The Canadian government is spying on you with that drone at 5:59 .🤣
You're definitely poppin' more.
I keep forgetting that you’re preaching to the mom and pop folks !
Wow. Bounced light for the win. I’m convinced.
Sorry dude but the EF85 1.2 looks so damn good. 👍🏻
That looks like some dangerous driving on a scooter. Buy a Hayabusa. 😎
your scooter driving scares the holy s out of me....
What do you think about people leaving RUclips like Matti Haapoja?
That damn BMPCC OG RULES ALL! Amazing.
You are not the butter to “my” biscuit
That sped up footage looks so smooth. Its not just sped up what else is happening.
It is weird / scary/ sad that the camera industry is dying off
I’m currently looking to replace my super zoom camera. I have an older Nikon P600. I’m looking for something with a fixed lens and mic jack to help with audio, something like the Panasonic FZ300. I will be using the camera primarily when I go to races, the all in 1 single device is a must. I don’t want to carry a lot of equipment up and down the bleachers. Any suggestions, Thank you in advance.
Kodak and Polaroid greetz Canon, Nikon, Sony ,,,
Whats wrong with this lens Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L USM ? On APS-C with speed booster its perfect imo..
I'm loving the scooter timelapses
Greatest camera-program thumbnail ever!
Conspiracy theory: canon is being weird about third party RF lenses because they don’t want to reveal that the reason the RF mount is so huge is because they’re planning on releasing a camera with a larger-than-full-frame sensor.
[edit] okay so RF and EF have the same inside diameter
No, Canon just sucks. Plastic garbage.
Nikon will
🤯
This sounds more like a camera conspiracy tbh. *shrug*
@@GrainOnTheGosony does not have a big enough mount
I stole a few of your moves in my recent vid. Yesterdays vid. Winter storm\RodeME-L 1:15-2:15 for a laugh.
there literally is a phillip bloom video in my recommendation cupboard and you mention his name. I now believe in conspiracies.
Canon's refusal to populate the enthusiast range of the RF system (can I get a weather sealed f/1.4 prime?) caused me to leave the system a couple years ago. I suspect they still haven't noticed my absence. The 16/24/50 cheap primes are a little trashy. The 35 1.8 is decent though.
In general, it seems like lens manufacturers are starting to rely way too much on in-camera corrections, which is pretty much always going to result in poor IQ in the corners.
I retired today. Now I can devote myself to finding the cinema. I'm rewarding myself with a new camera. If I could only find the perfect one 🙂
Hey in from Malaysia! When were you here? I from Johor state tho, you should come here and visit the beaches, the foods and Legoland Malaysia here!
The scooter footage gives me anxiety.
Hey Kasey - Watch out - don't get caught up in it !!!
Your heavily EQd audio (good effort, BTW): You're starting to sound like a Toeknee Smoothbelch Chelsthrup !
I switched to Sony from Canon during their 2nd gens. I still don't own any Sony glass...I still rock old ef L primes and vintage stuff. Seems counterintuitive to most but i did it for the perks of mirrorless and wanted that R resolution and DR. I have no issues with MF. Most of Sony's glass I've tried just seems meh and over priced. My voightlander collection is growing. I'm regretting selling my Canon 400 prime thinking Sony would eventually make something i can afford... I'm not really holding my breath anymore.
Canon was the best at one time, back in the CCD days. Now I see no point to their existence.
There was no real difference in the CCD days, except that Canon had a massive brand recognition advantage. Minolta and Sony made better CCD cameras but most people hadn't heard of them back then.
Don't be Canon haters... What would we do without the cripple hammer?
@@flyingping I only loved two camera manufacturers: Mamiya and Minolta but they're dead. The rest I don't hate but I am sceptical.
@@audioupgrades Yes sir I Nikon user early on but eventually yielded and was early digital adopter in Canon. I now have ~$40K + in expensive bodies/lenses and feel pretty much stuck. Probably not unlike many many other picture-taking folk, we will drive the wheels off of our current equipment and allow ourselves to be FORCED into deep end of pool. It's the resulting picture... Not the equipment or so I'm told.
We endeavor to persevere 🎥
@@flyingping If you have a good system it's better to keep it. Changing systems is expensive, time-consuming, frustrating and pointless because you'll still take the same kind of pictures at the end of it
We're going to read a footnote to the news someday (RUclipsr became a greasespot on the pavement today when through no fault of his own, his electric scooter was re-kitted by a confluence of bus/parked car/cross traffic and boom extended DJI III on a busy Toronto street this afternoon....more at 11) More guts than I have riding that thing all over. BTW, Nikon isn't doing 1.4 primes but are doing 1.2s in the S line and leaving the 1.4s to their "partners"....which is why I still drive DSLRs and "old" glass, some of it really old, older than you, older than your mom.
Aggressive look with that haircut, dude. Great content as always.
I just saw an ad for the new rf 600 super tele, it's only 18k Cdn. That lens pales in comparison to the 70x zoom on my 2009 Pannyboy SDR S26...I just filmed you with it and boy did you pop, I think I compressed you too much though, you may want to check with your physician..
Sometimes I really love this show you put on. Sony actually inherited a tonne of technology when they acquired Minolta Konica in 2006. Minolta and Konica merged in 2003. Konica has a history of fantastic optics I think prior to mirrorless the deciding factor that krippled the adaption of Konica glass was it's flange distance. It has begun to gain popularity as people discover it's exceptional quality adapting to mirrorless. I'm digressing from my initial point that Sony does have a wealth of technology in their inherited archives. I think the biggest kick in the balls for camera companies has been cell phones. The Money these companies have lost in the consumer market has increased the cost of photo/video centric tools for professionals and advanced enthusiasts. Sony has stayed strong because they are a big player in the digital everything market with their sensor production. That Canon 50 f1.4 has very nice glass, it is actually sharper over all than the 50 f1.2L but yes the focuss failure issue is real, I know you will dissagree and I respect and agree with your criticisms but Sigma has a much better constructed 50 f1.4. I have a couple Sigma lenses that are actually very good lenses, there are minor issues I could pick at. It's funny how accurate you are with some of your analogies for the camera industry, I think the truth is these are massive corporations that have divissions that compete amongst themselves and there are cycles they go through where technology gets exploited to meet corporate profits, to fund developement, then they market products and if there isn't enough base sales the price of the best equipment goes up and they eliminate the middle ground. They will keep cheaper product lines around to fill the budget sales segment, but they hold out on the middle market in fear of impacting sales of their Flagship and professional lines, or withold updates to prompt sales of their new offerings. I know some professionals actually enjoy the exclusivity or prestige of tools not everyone has or can afford. Sony for a while was really packing a lot in their offerings, they still do, but it comes at a price. I'm hoping Canon will start a trend towards more affordable equipment with greater utility there original 7D was a killer camera when it came out and offered allot for the price, al be it a crop sensor. technology has outpaced it's utility for video today but they did exceptionally well with that Camera, maybe the R8 or something like it could be their next 7D? I would love to see them release an "almost perfect" camera that would push the industry to shift gears back toward providing better more versatile equipment with pro-features for advanced users who really could make fantastic use of it.
Ultimately, satisfied customers sharing their love for these tools and the increadible work possible with them, have always been their best Ambassadors.
Wonky art, merino shirt.
Ricoh/Pentax FTW-still developing DSLRs and the only company other than Leica that gives a sh*t about still photography
CC, your videos on the Nikon Z30 almost convinced me to buy it, but for my Dad's arsenal of MFT lenses to learn on. Ended up getting a Lumix G95 and am using a loaner Oly 14-42 to learn. Did I screw up? You seem to love the Nikon Z30, should I keep that setup in consideration for future purchase or trade in? I shoot outdoor daylight events video, real estate listing photos, and portraits mostly
I would love to see a Nikon budget 500mm f/5.6 DX VR prime for five or six hundred bucks.
Sony should include a vaccine against skin rash with each camera.
Sony cameras are excellent for portraits. You just have to know which settings to use.
Intentional Obsolescence
I came to RUclips with the sole purpose of finding a new video from Camera Conspiracies and bam here it is🙌🏽❤️
I prefer it off the wall tbh
Cutting your hair increased your production value 10 fold. Also, I noticed no change on the glimmer glass. I watch on a studio display.
Can you review ZHIYUN LED Fiveray M20C (RGB) Combo Pocket Light ? :)
I wonder if the camera companies watch your videos during their lunch breaks. (This amazing one would put them off their food!!)
Ahhhh.....I was wondering if all was ok since there was no CC video for two days. We've grown accustomed to daily posts! LOL!
Say, aren't you the guy who recommended the RF 16mm F/2.8 to ME for vlogging? That's alright. We all make mistakes!
Most people don't have my level of lens snobbery :)
So the new Panasonic S 100mm 2.8 macro doesn’t count?
…… yea I get it you make your videos ahead of the time