Every day Falun gong channel publish bullshit "news" like three gorges dam, carrier, or anything in China having cracks visible from space. If you watch anything on RUclips with channel name starts like "China XXXXX", it's 95% chance to be fake news produced by them
The tail wings of the J-15 can fold while those of the J-35 cannot. Therefore, it is not necessary for the main wings of the J-35 to become narrower than the tail wings when folded.
She is one beautiful ship. You mentioned that the cables across the forward flight deck at 4:07 are likely arrestor cables. Why would they be laid out so far forward? I also think those straddling the deck from port to starboard look too lightweight for arrestor cables and may be power cables. Thanks for the update ENI! Best wishes from across the puddle!
There are fuel lines at different points in the section of video you mentioned but the other wires may be an emergency system to stop aircraft during movements.
The construction and improvement of the first two carriers took longer than expected. As more and more countries come up with new ship building programs, it's clear that we have to speed things up to make sure we're not threatened in the ocean lanes.
It is? Shandong was launched in April 2017 and commissioned in December 2019. Fujian was launched in July 2022, didn't have its first sea trial until 2024, despite officers saying it would be March 2023. For it to have the same speed as Shandong from launch to commission the Fujain would need to be commissioned in February 2025. Where is this 'speed' I keep hearing about?
It has to, it's at a geographical disadvantage and can easily be destroyed by subs and missiles through choke points, the 1st and 2nd island chains. Numerical superiority doesn't guarantee a win, it just makes up for the amount of ships they'll lose in a war vs the west
@@Ronmexico211China's naval power are mostly for defence only. Tanks and ships these days are more vulnerable than ever before and it is the same for both sides
The Chinese navy is not the largest by gross tonnage, only by quantity. When the CCP has 10 aircraft carriers of 100K tons or more, then you get to brag. Until then, you are just making a lot of noise. Nobody is listening.
@@Ronmexico211This is just cope. “Easily destroyed” lmao. China’s military is already powerful and will rapidly continue to grow each year and there’s nothing that can stop them. Also the “West”. Stop bringing up “allies”.
If China wants to go globally, China would need many more support ships, and the most important thing is China needs more friendly countries that let China build their bases or provide food and fuel. But the true fact is China doesn’t have many friends, China only has friends like North Korea, Iran, Russia. So with no friends, the Chinese fleet cannot go very far
The USS FORRESTAL , SARATOGA , RANGER and INDEPENDENCE , CV-59 , 60 , 61 and 62 were the first SUPER CARRIERS and weighed in at 80, 000 tones , nice job on your first one China 👊👍🇨🇳. I launched Aircraft off of 3 of them........
Why comparing this to older aircraft carriers and not the Gerald R Ford? Why because you are too concerned that your mighty Fujian will become poopian when confronted by the Gerald R Ford?. Or even the USS Nimitz which is the oldest carrier in the world? You cannot compare with those mighty ships because the Fujian will get folded like the Samsung z fold.
The word "J-35" in Chinese is “歼-35”，“歼” pronounced “Jian” and has the meaning of "annihilation" and "elimination".The combat mission of this fighter is to engage enemy fighters, seize air superiority or carry out ground attack missions
In China, we refer to fighter jets as "歼击机"（Jiān Jī Jī）, with the first letter of "J" in pinyin "Q"means（land）Attack “强击机” （Qiáng Jī Jī） “H”means Bomber “轰炸机”（Hōng Zhà Jī） the last “机”（Jī） means Machine
No, the US uses electromagnetic catapults as well, but it is a relatively recent development and those on the Fujian are said to be more advanced as the ship does not have a nuclear reactor to draw power from.
@@92HazelMocha Acutally Fujian uses DC e-catapults and the US FORD uses a much more unreliable and power hungry AC version of an e-catapult. Also, the US Ford is the only US carrier to have that. China next 5 carriers will ALL have DC e-catapults.
@@Predator42ID Nice cope, useless words. That just goes to show how inefficient the US EMALS is. That you need nuclear power to run yours whereas China can put it on conventionally powered ships. If this EMALS is going to struggle, why is China putting it already on a 2nd ship (that’s smaller) before even testing the first on the first ship? They aren’t even the same. US is AC, China uses DC, and the US even looked at DC during their EMALS development. This ship was originally going to use steam, but clearly EMALS is the better choice. I think China’s dozen and hundreds of engineers that worked on this for decades know what they’re doing and talking about.
Once China perfected this, I think China will build 2 types of carriers. Several non-nuclear carriers like the Fujian, perhaps 2-3, which is more than sufficient for the SCS area. It is cheaper and easier to maintain too. And it doesn't have to travel far. Several nuclear carries like the Type 004, which I think China will build 5 or 6.
I highly doubt they will have so many carriers. There have been rumors that the 004 has been started now since 2017. I'm not convinced that the design for the 004 is ready for construction.
@@rizon72 Their target is still 6 carriers by 2030. There is till 5-6 years left, so if that target is still achievable, then they will have to ramp up production soon. Carrier is important for China because if there is a war with the US (very likely), China needs the carrier to fight US navy blockade in area outside the South China Sea. For that, they will need nuclear carrier. As for 004, I think they probably start the design in 2017.. Anyway, I heard they have been testing the Thorium based nuclear engine from year 2020 and it is very stable now. Thorium is better than Uranium nuclear engine used by the Ford class. So the type 004 most likely have DC EMAL (better than Ford class AC EMAL) and Thorium nuclear reactor. A better carrier than the Ford class.
Floating is not the same as working. What accent is that? Sounds like a mainlander who learned english from a german. They should use it for the next villain in a James Bond movie.
It just seems like the PLAN is moving slowly on this considering 4 years ago I was hearing it would be commissioned in 2023, then 2024, now it might not be until 2026! I do wonder if there are problems they are not talking about.
Uh, who said that? Speculations by people isn't indicative of how the PLAN operates and their timetables. The ships timeline is going as normal and it's sea trials are going *much faster* than even their first two STOBAR carriers despite the 003 being a much larger and complex ship. And four years ago? This thing was only launched 2.5 years ago. Wasn't even launched yet by the time you just said.
@@Flightman453 You might reread. I didn't say it would be commissioned 4 years ago, I wrote 4 years ago I was hearing it would be commissioned in 2023. So in 2019 I was hearing rumors the Fujian would be commissioned in 2023. Also, the Fujian isn't going faster than the other two carriers. The Shandong took roughly 20 months from launching to commissioning which the Fujian to keep the same schedule would need to be commissioned in February 2025. Not really comparing it to the Liaoning due to the fact it was rebuilt instead. From what I can find it took about a year, maybe 21 months from being completed to commissioning. Hell, the first sea trails officers were saying were supposed to be in March 2023, which didn't happen until 2024. So tell me again how its going fast? The more I read the more I'm thinking there is something wrong.
We really need 2 seater J-35 drone controllers in the mix. Or use 2 seater J-15s as rear echelon drone controllers with their stealthy loyal wingmen flying ahead to assist the J-35s? The J-15s could also be PL-17 missile trucks, firing off PL-17s from beyond the enemy's detection range, handing over the missiles to J-35s when they enter the enemy's detection range. So many possibilities for the Fujian's air group...
I still remember the time America says they are committed to a One-China policy but immediately they sent weapons to Taiwan, troops to train the Taiwanese army an politicians visited Taiwan without any approval from China.
I also remember our Secretary of State signing a memo in the late 90’s promising USSR that after disintegration of its empire, NATO WILL NOT covert its satellite states into NATO members! We all know what happened. You can Google for a copy, it is in the public domain. No treaties our American government ever signed with our native India nations that we did not BREAK!
@@capdew Immediately? ... When was that? The issue was adressed in the Joint Communiqué in 1979. Btw, some problems arise from different words in the respective translations into chinese and english.
@@capdew The US does and has always committed to the One-China policy. That is why they never refer to Taiwan as the Republic of China, which is exactly the same as the CCP. They never use 中华民国 either.
@@Predator42IDThat isn’t what hypersonic weapons refer to as today. They simply aren’t talking about speed. They are talking about HGV’s. Why do people keep saying this like the US isn’t trying to develop their owns?
While China's military industrial production and development is very impressive, it is still a pity that so much Chinese time, effort, money and talent has to be spent on military defence. Even though unlike America, China has no aspirations of global military pre-eminence, the rest of the world can be grateful that China is making sure that it will never again be plunged into the humiliation of military defeat and exploitation. Moreover, China is the world's only defender and protector of a modern socialism with national characteristics; a more sophisticated and sustainable form of governance for the future well being of humanity.
That guy is so ignorant by saying the arrest cable is at the front of the carrier..and can't he tell the tail fins are wider for the J35 than the J15 so the wings fold up in parallel the the tail fins? lmfao!
Only the type 001 is a 2nd hand Kuznetsov , the type 002 is based on the Kuznetsov aswell but it's 100% Chinese built. There's 4 Kuznetsov aircraft carriers active in the world. 2 Chinese, 1 Indian and 1 Russian. The Chinese ones are lightyears ahead, they are much better kept and maintained and serviced and have received numerous upgrades and modifications. Like comparing an F16 from the 80s with a modern F16. Yes they look pretty much the same, but trust me they're very different.
@@RadicalFloat_95 ~That's the reason, why I could recommended people's to get proper knowledge📚 about it before, while replying anything in the comments section like you....!!
carrier fujian is still far from fully operational basic take off and landing are only beginning i prefer call carrier fujian program is running by schedule, which is far more important than so called "is working" by this "running by schedule", China proven to be capable for run a large program without delay and wrong project foresee, which means Chinese navy alone with large shipyard and all included research and producting facilities are running at good state, the project makers fully estimated all possible problems in the beginning, and researchers and workers produce parts of a fully new warship for China with no mistake that is much more important than the carrier fujian project
The USA has 11 super aircraft carrier china has 3 US allied forces has 10 aircraft carriers combine approximately plus 70 or more of experience i pressume so whats the fuzz about made in china. ??
In the Soviet era, the Su-33 was being derided for being bigger and thus able to pack less aircraft than the other Soviet carrier jet, the MiG-29. Thus the designer was ordered to rebuild it with folding tail too. The change increased the structural mass and complexity of the airframe (decreasing effective payload fraction and increasing maintainer demand per flight hour)- overall not worth it, but at least they could now shut up the pro-MiG guys.
Actually China's J11, J15. and J16 are derivatives of Su27 not Su30 nor Su33! Su33 only comes into play in China after J11 was well established and the latest are Su35.
@@raymondwong3739 theoretically, in the way all airplanes stem from the Wright Brother's plane. Su-33 types involved significant structural changes that are present within J15 but not J11/16
@@NewAgeOfPower Lmao! Wright' brother? Your mind set is way back and why not Leonardo? Su33 is a "stepping up version" with a bigger frame to carry out more fittings and it is genetic to Su27. No wonder the Americans always claim China stole their AI and EV cars' designs simply because a car with 4 wheels and using battery powered is American claimed? So all car producing countries stole all car designs from UK plus the telephone communications (I know you are going to say usa made the claim first even when UK invented it first didn't count) ? SO in turns it's time for China to claims the Wests stole the desgins of all military weaponry from China because China invented gun powder!?????? That is REAL SILLY man!
@@Flightman453 correct. And the US Navy does not have any active battleships. Neither does any other navy. But if you want to visit one the North Carolina battleship is in Wilmington NC.
Go China !!! Go China !!! Please Use the new J35 with improved engines and radar system. And AI , Quantum Communication , etc being installed in the Fujian Carrier.
takes 50 years of running aircraft carriers to solve the bugs and gremlins. lets see how chinese ones do, as you can see russias did not fair well. Im sure tug boats will be travelling along side it for a while. The immense tonage does a real number on the engines .
Fujian is far superior than the american counterparts since the american can only catapult 25 tons which means the F35C can not be airborned fully loaded!
@@RectalRooter The fact that it's displacement is bigger, has more catapults and will field a 5th gen airwing over the Europeans make it super. Only behind the Nimitz/Ford carriers
As usual the short term thinking West gets it wrong. Even if this carrier sucks it matters not because the Chinese will learn, make adjustments, refine and build a better one next time. Since China has an incredible manufacturing and industrial base I can guarantee that their next ship will be better and so forth. Look at the advancements made between their very first and most recent carrier the Fujian. Massive strides in terms of ability, size, technology and overall lethality have been made. They initially make baby steps then larger and more capable leaps over time while learning and gaining indispensable knowledge along the way until they are incredibly adept at it. Let's face it when it comes to STEM and other relevant studies the Chinese are a tremendous force. An example of how they learn and eventually master an endeavour remember in their nascent foray into EVs years ago, the US excoriated the Chinese for making subpar vehicles. Fast forward two decades later and now no one is laughing at their capabilities. In fact the collective West is now panicking and becoming more protectionist with tariffs because they know they can't compete with China's EV cars. The Chinese are a 5000+ year old civilization not country and have accumulated true wisdom over the years.
Structural cracks indicate possible construction malpractices. The ship must be stressed to the point that it meets the calibrated design parameters vs actual data. From there, the ship engineers can determine if defects are inherently design flaws or mistakes committed during construction that can be corrected. Materials oxidize at different rates especially when exposed to temperature changes in the Pacific. Better to see how corrosion works on the ship while at port rather than discover potential failures at sea that can sink the ship. Ships fail all the time and the Pacific Ocean is a merciless master that has taken the lives of too many sailors. As the first ship of her class, she must undergo testing set to high standards so that follow-on ships can be modified. The emals system is a novel means of launching and recovering aircraft. But as for its reliability in operations with high tempo can be problematic and its operational success falls into the hands of mechanics. In the middle of the ocean, it maybe a more practicable and safer method to have a ski-jump launch system for aircraft. With no moving parts, what can go wrong?
Oh, how cute. Let’s see them run flight deck ops at night, in the rain and snow, 3000 miles from their home port. I want to see 9,000 landings in six months. Till then, it’s a joke.
Keep coping. Carriers aren’t the only ships that matter. And idiots like you who speak about them as if they are just outing yourself as having zero military knowledge in the slightest. Keep huffing about for carriers as if for the cost of one US CVN, China couldn’t build 10+ 055s and finish them years before that carrier you keep talking about even leaves its dock for it’s first sea trials. Cope.
They are American Aircraft Carriers, not "Super Carriers". Stop saying that silly stuff. US Navy recruiting is so bad that nearly 15% of the US Fleet isn't combat capable due to lack of trained Sailors. Nothing Super about our Fleet.
Super carrier is a term that refers to size, not quality of the ship or its crew. The Fujian is significantly larger than the Liaoning or the Shandong. The same is true when comparing the Nimitz and Ford Class carriers to older much smaller ones like the Forrestal class.
Investing money in carriers is a poor strategic choice for China. They’re nowhere near being able to project power like the US Navy and China is surrounded by potential enemies that would serve as bases for US aircraft in the event of conflict. China wouldn’t be able to break the blockade of the first island chain with 12 carriers. If China wanted to defend the South China Sea (like they say their goal is in a conflict) then investing money in submarines and anti-ship missile carrying aircraft, plus the tankers to fuel them and increase their effective range, would be their best bet. China’s whole problem is they’re surrounded by enemies and their actions are doing nothing to improve their situation. Militaries don’t win large scale conflicts, coalitions do. There is no conceivable scenario in which China wins a naval conflict against the U.S., Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Philippines.
Filipinas não estão confirmadas, provavelmente a Rússia ajudará a china, patrulhando águas rasas assim deixando os navios maiores da china lutarem batalhas em mar aberto, a china não tem 3 porta aviões no pacífico ela Tam mais de 40 , cada ilha e reforçada com radares bases aéreas e portos , são dezenas de miniaturas de Guã em uma pequena área e todas podem ser reforçadas por plaaf assim agindo como porta aviões estáticos por todo aquele mar, a força aérea Russa ainda pode colocar mais aviões e sistemas anti aéreos em caso de uma guerra aumentando o poder de defesa e ataque do ELP
window's seems closing for them. at that point, US and their asian allies would had the upper hand again. heck, this feels like pacific war 1941 all over again
Upper hand in what? In ship building? In industrial supply chain? Or in skilled labour? Ship building yards in S. Korea & Japan are in the range of Chinese missiles and bombing. USA was a industrial powerhouse prior to WWI and WWII, now all it got is dollars printing machines and worthless papers
@@directxxxx71 its all as u said if they (China) determine for war before 2027 or 2025 fastest to force the allies on Chinese terms. above that, idk dude. its gonna be a world-shaking war. all it takes just an idiot in the Taiwan whom brave enough to consider independent statement
US can't even maintain their ships, let alone building new ones. How exactly would they have the upper hand? By buying ships from China? Do you live under a rock since world war 2?
Simple answer: Cause until now, they aren't strong enough to fight with US and other allies who can support Taiwan in the war. It won't be a duel but a world war, China need at least 8 carriers like Fujian to think about taking Taiwan
US with population of 300 million already has 11 operating aircraft carriers and at least 3000 combat fighter jets. China with a population of 1.3 billion people, needs to have at least 20 aircraft carriers and at least 5000 fighter jets to protect her people. Period. Way to go China. jiayou!
Where's the China haters claiming the deck had huge cracks ?
I could stand in, with my Anglo name, but I'll warn you now, my heart won't be in it 🤣Hoping in my next life to be born in China 🥰
They're busy claiming a nuclear sub sank in the Yangtze.
Makes them feel better. Stupid though. Wishing doesn't make anything come true.
@@davidcadman4468 Brits malding that fujian is better than their queen elizabeth carriers.
Every day Falun gong channel publish bullshit "news" like three gorges dam, carrier, or anything in China having cracks visible from space. If you watch anything on RUclips with channel name starts like "China XXXXX", it's 95% chance to be fake news produced by them
Good Report, thank you for the search and upload!
The tail wings of the J-15 can fold while those of the J-35 cannot. Therefore, it is not necessary for the main wings of the J-35 to become narrower than the tail wings when folded.
wrong, j35 navy version wings can be folded
@@danielhsiung8668 The photos in this video don't have the TAIL wings folded.
@@captives6479因为那是舰载机调度训练的模型，在陆地有一个舰载机训练基地，包括了滑跃起飞和弹射起飞，相关训练早在航母建造之前就在进行当中，歼35舰载机折翼照片已经出现在中国互联网上
All patriots of the motherland should support this channel.
What if we are not from China? 😂
Why ? You do understand the channel is not a pro any country. If you listen to the words instead of making your own.
@@camt8804 Those rednecks are blind patriot so even if it is gabbage, still americans gabbage!
@@RectalRooter watch his video about potential war. He's ultra pro China
She is one beautiful ship. You mentioned that the cables across the forward flight deck at 4:07 are likely arrestor cables. Why would they be laid out so far forward? I also think those straddling the deck from port to starboard look too lightweight for arrestor cables and may be power cables.
Thanks for the update ENI! Best wishes from across the puddle!
There are fuel lines at different points in the section of video you mentioned but the other wires may be an emergency system to stop aircraft during movements.
China’s pace at which sea trials are carried out is truly amazing if compared to their previous carriers. They are really hurrying up!!
因为我们中国在等新航母新无人机服役，我们的敌人在等什么？
Hurrying up to disaster they have no experience in carrier operations or naval warfare it will be just a regional navy no power projection
The construction and improvement of the first two carriers took longer than expected. As more and more countries come up with new ship building programs, it's clear that we have to speed things up to make sure we're not threatened in the ocean lanes.
因为中国的海外资产正在被打劫
It is? Shandong was launched in April 2017 and commissioned in December 2019. Fujian was launched in July 2022, didn't have its first sea trial until 2024, despite officers saying it would be March 2023.
For it to have the same speed as Shandong from launch to commission the Fujain would need to be commissioned in February 2025.
Where is this 'speed' I keep hearing about?
China will build 8 new mega aircraft carriers…
how do u know that? pl. post ur sources! in any case, time will tell!
@@Steven-k8tI only know they plan to build 7 carrier
That's a good news for us and a heavy news for them. 😄
🥂🥂The more the merrier! Afterall China can afford more carriers!
076 了解下 电磁弹射的两栖攻击舰
wow, great
Beautiful aircraft carrier, thanks for the info.
J-15D is my fav plane!!!
Same
but too expensive
J35A ❤
D diàn =電
why？
I'm not from china but instead from Singapore. Kudos for a great research! May china thrive!
China 🇨🇳 now has the largest Navy in the world 🌍, regarding the amount of ships they have and all of us fighter pilots want to give China a thumbs up!
It has to, it's at a geographical disadvantage and can easily be destroyed by subs and missiles through choke points, the 1st and 2nd island chains.
Numerical superiority doesn't guarantee a win, it just makes up for the amount of ships they'll lose in a war vs the west
@Ronmexico211 . We're Russian fighter pilots, so Don't preach to us! 🇷🇺
@@Ronmexico211China's naval power are mostly for defence only. Tanks and ships these days are more vulnerable than ever before and it is the same for both sides
The Chinese navy is not the largest by gross tonnage, only by quantity. When the CCP has 10 aircraft carriers of 100K tons or more, then you get to brag. Until then, you are just making a lot of noise. Nobody is listening.
@@Ronmexico211This is just cope. “Easily destroyed” lmao. China’s military is already powerful and will rapidly continue to grow each year and there’s nothing that can stop them. Also the “West”. Stop bringing up “allies”.
Nice 👍
Love the updates! Thank youuuu :)))
That is the goal.
The Chinese Navy needs at least six aircraft carriers.
They are already in the maken of a carrier or two it not completely conformed but it could be need to wait for the future to see china new performance
The next ones will probably be nuclear powered, super carrier sized.
@@Team6OWGEurasia navel insight fans will probably know this already 😂
7 carrier's, 5 nuclear powered. 1 for SEA, 1 for pacific, 1 for Mideast, 1 for Africa, 1 for north sea, while 2 as back up.
If China wants to go globally, China would need many more support ships, and the most important thing is China needs more friendly countries that let China build their bases or provide food and fuel.
But the true fact is China doesn’t have many friends, China only has friends like North Korea, Iran, Russia. So with no friends, the Chinese fleet cannot go very far
The USS FORRESTAL , SARATOGA , RANGER and INDEPENDENCE , CV-59 , 60 , 61 and 62 were the first SUPER CARRIERS and weighed in at 80, 000 tones , nice job on your first one China 👊👍🇨🇳.
I launched Aircraft off of 3 of them........
Why comparing this to older aircraft carriers and not the Gerald R Ford? Why because you are too concerned that your mighty Fujian will become poopian when confronted by the Gerald R Ford?. Or even the USS Nimitz which is the oldest carrier in the world? You cannot compare with those mighty ships because the Fujian will get folded like the Samsung z fold.
Wonderful China well done keep it up n God bless you all
I would like to see how those magnetic catapult are working. No video simulation, please.
What does the "J-" prefix mean? In the US, "F-" means Fighter, "A-" means (land) Attack, and "B-" means Bomber. What do the Chinese prefixes mean?
The word "J-35" in Chinese is “歼-35”，“歼” pronounced “Jian” and has the meaning of "annihilation" and "elimination".The combat mission of this fighter is to engage enemy fighters, seize air superiority or carry out ground attack missions
In China,
we refer to fighter jets as "歼击机"（Jiān Jī Jī）, with the first letter of "J" in pinyin
"Q"means（land）Attack “强击机” （Qiáng Jī Jī）
“H”means Bomber “轰炸机”（Hōng Zhà Jī）
the last “机”（Jī） means Machine
The Fujian uses the advanced electromotive catapults whereas the USA Carriers use the old, steam catapults?
CorrecT?
No, the US uses electromagnetic catapults as well, but it is a relatively recent development and those on the Fujian are said to be more advanced as the ship does not have a nuclear reactor to draw power from.
@@92HazelMocha Acutally Fujian uses DC e-catapults and the US FORD uses a much more unreliable and power hungry AC version of an e-catapult. Also, the US Ford is the only US carrier to have that. China next 5 carriers will ALL have DC e-catapults.
@@Predator42ID Then explain why the Ford Carrier keeps going into maintenance mode for its Emals?
@@Predator42ID The USA is far ahead of China most definitely.
@@Predator42ID Nice cope, useless words. That just goes to show how inefficient the US EMALS is. That you need nuclear power to run yours whereas China can put it on conventionally powered ships. If this EMALS is going to struggle, why is China putting it already on a 2nd ship (that’s smaller) before even testing the first on the first ship? They aren’t even the same. US is AC, China uses DC, and the US even looked at DC during their EMALS development. This ship was originally going to use steam, but clearly EMALS is the better choice. I think China’s dozen and hundreds of engineers that worked on this for decades know what they’re doing and talking about.
Once China perfected this, I think China will build 2 types of carriers.
Several non-nuclear carriers like the Fujian, perhaps 2-3, which is more than sufficient for the SCS area.
It is cheaper and easier to maintain too. And it doesn't have to travel far.
Several nuclear carries like the Type 004, which I think China will build 5 or 6.
I highly doubt they will have so many carriers. There have been rumors that the 004 has been started now since 2017. I'm not convinced that the design for the 004 is ready for construction.
@@rizon72 Their target is still 6 carriers by 2030. There is till 5-6 years left, so if that target is still achievable,
then they will have to ramp up production soon.
Carrier is important for China because if there is a war with the US (very likely), China needs the carrier
to fight US navy blockade in area outside the South China Sea. For that, they will need nuclear carrier.
As for 004, I think they probably start the design in 2017..
Anyway, I heard they have been testing the Thorium based nuclear engine from year 2020 and it is
very stable now. Thorium is better than Uranium nuclear engine used by the Ford class.
So the type 004 most likely have DC EMAL (better than Ford class AC EMAL) and Thorium nuclear reactor.
A better carrier than the Ford class.
New era 🎉
If you were a designer, what additional features would you add to the Fujian aircraft carrier?
打击外星人。
真不知道西方网友在担心什么，这只是一个大一点的渔船而已，落后美国50年。要知道美国拥有21艘更先进的航母
也确实差一些，技术配套还有实战经验。黑海舰队也被寄予太高期待了，实战几乎没发挥应有的作用。而且当前美元主导的金融体系一个航母群是撼动不了的，人民币国际化也还有很长的路要走。Peace and good luck 🍀
Is there a reason why you dun think they have already launched aircraft at sea? It’s not like the cameras are there 24/7?
I don't see the aircraft carrier actually running or working. Only still pictures, even with pictures, i don't see planes taking off or landing.
Floating is not the same as working. What accent is that? Sounds like a mainlander who learned english from a german. They should use it for the next villain in a James Bond movie.
This sounds like cope.
How come no real aircraft have been launched or recovered… delayed?
It just seems like the PLAN is moving slowly on this considering 4 years ago I was hearing it would be commissioned in 2023, then 2024, now it might not be until 2026! I do wonder if there are problems they are not talking about.
Uh, who said that? Speculations by people isn't indicative of how the PLAN operates and their timetables. The ships timeline is going as normal and it's sea trials are going *much faster* than even their first two STOBAR carriers despite the 003 being a much larger and complex ship. And four years ago? This thing was only launched 2.5 years ago. Wasn't even launched yet by the time you just said.
@@Flightman453 You might reread. I didn't say it would be commissioned 4 years ago, I wrote 4 years ago I was hearing it would be commissioned in 2023. So in 2019 I was hearing rumors the Fujian would be commissioned in 2023.
Also, the Fujian isn't going faster than the other two carriers. The Shandong took roughly 20 months from launching to commissioning which the Fujian to keep the same schedule would need to be commissioned in February 2025. Not really comparing it to the Liaoning due to the fact it was rebuilt instead. From what I can find it took about a year, maybe 21 months from being completed to commissioning.
Hell, the first sea trails officers were saying were supposed to be in March 2023, which didn't happen until 2024.
So tell me again how its going fast?
The more I read the more I'm thinking there is something wrong.
nice
Largest navy but can you keep up with repairs keeping it is the same for everyone
We really need 2 seater J-35 drone controllers in the mix.
Or use 2 seater J-15s as rear echelon drone controllers with their stealthy loyal wingmen flying ahead to assist the J-35s?
The J-15s could also be PL-17 missile trucks, firing off PL-17s from beyond the enemy's detection range, handing over the missiles to J-35s when they enter the enemy's detection range.
So many possibilities for the Fujian's air group...
I still remember the time when China acquired the AC Warjag from Ukraine and earnestly claimed they are not interested in building aircraft carriers.
I still remember the time America says they are committed to a One-China policy but immediately they sent weapons to Taiwan, troops to train the Taiwanese army an politicians visited Taiwan without any approval from China.
I also remember our Secretary of State signing a memo in the late 90’s promising USSR that after disintegration of its empire, NATO WILL NOT covert its satellite states into NATO members! We all know what happened. You can Google for a copy, it is in the public domain. No treaties our American government ever signed with our native India nations that we did not BREAK!
@@capdew Immediately? ... When was that? The issue was adressed in the Joint Communiqué in 1979. Btw, some problems arise from different words in the respective translations into chinese and english.
@thomas_jay you are really a hardcore liar, I happen to understand both languages well as a Singaporean
@@capdew The US does and has always committed to the One-China policy. That is why they never refer to Taiwan as the Republic of China, which is exactly the same as the CCP. They never use 中华民国 either.
Instead of folding their wings, why not just have them park on unlevel ground so their wings to over and under each other.
I thought those puppies were kinda out of date in the age of hypersonic missles, etc.
Well the US is the primary geopolitical rival of China and they don't have hypersonic weapons. The same is true of India.
@@Predator42IDno they have not. The US has Ballistic missiles
@@Predator42IDThat isn’t what hypersonic weapons refer to as today. They simply aren’t talking about speed. They are talking about HGV’s. Why do people keep saying this like the US isn’t trying to develop their owns?
Puppies.. Where ? Protect those puppies before the ccp eats them
@@RectalRooter So the Americans can eat them later? Like they eat their allies?
The tofu carrier finally takes to water like a duck❤
Yep, like your fake face made of tofu lol.
如果有一天炸弹💣落在你的头上😂你也会说是豆腐做的吗？😂😂
When you realize how big Fujian actually is :O
如果中国认为拥有最强大的海军，就不要想着攻击其他国家。记住这一点！
IOC of carrier will be by mid 2026
Well done China looks bloody awesome 👍, from Australia 🦘
BEAUTIFUL 😍 😎🙏🏻
After watching the whole video, I still don't know what the Chinese are testing this time around.
Adverse weather conditions and maybe even flight ops with some prototype J15T's
China PLAN will test J15T and KJ600 fly/landing in 5th sea trial, if I understand correctly.
Nobody knows. The ccp doesn't give that kind of info out.
@@RectalRooter This I can agree to, at least for now. There will be documentaries in the near future. Thing this big? It has to.
J15T/J35 /KJ600
lol
They named it after my hometown.
第五次海试任务徽章已经讲得很直白了，就是弹射试验任务
While China's military industrial production and development is very impressive, it is still a pity that so much Chinese time, effort, money and talent has to be spent on military defence. Even though unlike America, China has no aspirations of global military pre-eminence, the rest of the world can be grateful that China is making sure that it will never again be plunged into the humiliation of military defeat and exploitation. Moreover, China is the world's only defender and protector of a modern socialism with national characteristics; a more sophisticated and sustainable form of governance for the future well being of humanity.
Why not nuclear?
That guy is so ignorant by saying the arrest cable is at the front of the carrier..and can't he tell the tail fins are wider for the J35 than the J15 so the wings fold up in parallel the the tail fins? lmfao!
不积跬步无以至千里
Thanks to the Fujian aircraft carrier, China will get lots of experiences and skills to build more powerful and more efficient aircraft carriers.
Excellent video of Fujian CV-18
Will use this footage to help me build my 'Magic Factory' 1/700 Fujian I purchased month of November 2024.
It doesnt really matter who has the most world destruction weapons the strngest are the ones that dont punc.😊😊
It's now doing catapult trials? now? It didn't do ut the first thing out? well, I guess you can fail and still move forward
What? Nothing “failed”. Trials are done testing different systems. They haven’t even tested it yet but most likely will on this sea trial.
It's been tested hundreds of times if not thousands... on land.
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍
its not nucleard powered though..
Ok. And?
So are the 2 2nd-hand carriers of our 3rd-brotha finally working 100%?
And fully equipped?
Or the 2 carriers of the UK?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Only the type 001 is a 2nd hand Kuznetsov , the type 002 is based on the Kuznetsov aswell but it's 100% Chinese built.
There's 4 Kuznetsov aircraft carriers active in the world. 2 Chinese, 1 Indian and 1 Russian. The Chinese ones are lightyears ahead, they are much better kept and maintained and serviced and have received numerous upgrades and modifications.
Like comparing an F16 from the 80s with a modern F16. Yes they look pretty much the same, but trust me they're very different.
@@daniels0376 uh huh... Indian Navy.😢
@@daniels0376 he is talking about Indian Navy 😅
@@daniels0376 money's a bit tight with Russia and India as you can imagine.
India’s aircraft carrier is Kiev class one, it’s not Kuznetsov class aircraft carrier unlike China’s Liaoning & Russia’s Kuznetsov.
Where are the people who were addicted to spamming “tofu dreg” 😂😂.
Humans now proved that they can conquer on earth, next goal to prove is to be aliens and invade other planets
Beautiful ship! It is becoming a symbol against Western hegemony and imperialism.
Replacing Imperialism with... Imperialism.
Fujian must carry enough charcoal to make it's way back CCP home base😅
BALANCE is PEACE ✌️♥️
Indian defence channels are crying in corner 😂
Do you understand this channel covers India. Thats why your called a Little barking dog
Your thinking is wrong, India have also aircraft carriers.....!!
Yes but actually no and sorry l actually couldn't hear you cause your actually that irrelevant. @@Vikashkumarverma-lr2ur
@@RadicalFloat_95 ~That's the reason, why I could recommended people's to get proper knowledge📚 about it before, while replying anything in the comments section like you....!!
carrier fujian is still far from fully operational
basic take off and landing are only beginning
i prefer call carrier fujian program is running by schedule, which is far more important than so called "is working"
by this "running by schedule", China proven to be capable for run a large program without delay and wrong project foresee, which means Chinese navy alone with large shipyard and all included research and producting facilities are running at good state, the project makers fully estimated all possible problems in the beginning, and researchers and workers produce parts of a fully new warship for China with no mistake
that is much more important than the carrier fujian project
The USA has 11 super aircraft carrier china has 3 US allied forces has 10 aircraft carriers combine approximately plus 70 or more of experience i pressume so whats the fuzz about made in china. ??
❤❤❤❤
In the Soviet era, the Su-33 was being derided for being bigger and thus able to pack less aircraft than the other Soviet carrier jet, the MiG-29. Thus the designer was ordered to rebuild it with folding tail too. The change increased the structural mass and complexity of the airframe (decreasing effective payload fraction and increasing maintainer demand per flight hour)- overall not worth it, but at least they could now shut up the pro-MiG guys.
Actually China's J11, J15. and J16 are derivatives of Su27 not Su30 nor Su33! Su33 only comes into play in China after J11 was well established and the latest are Su35.
@@raymondwong3739 J-11/16 are Su-27 lineage. J-15 is 100% from Su-33 lineage lol.
@@NewAgeOfPower I can see what you are getting at but Su35, Su33 and Su30 are derivatives of Su27 or am I wrong?
@@raymondwong3739 theoretically, in the way all airplanes stem from the Wright Brother's plane. Su-33 types involved significant structural changes that are present within J15 but not J11/16
@@NewAgeOfPower Lmao! Wright' brother? Your mind set is way back and why not Leonardo? Su33 is a "stepping up version" with a bigger frame to carry out more fittings and it is genetic to Su27. No wonder the Americans always claim China stole their AI and EV cars' designs simply because a car with 4 wheels and using battery powered is American claimed? So all car producing countries stole all car designs from UK plus the telephone communications (I know you are going to say usa made the claim first even when UK invented it first didn't count) ? SO in turns it's time for China to claims the Wests stole the desgins of all military weaponry from China because China invented gun powder!?????? That is REAL SILLY man!
Of course its working
Aircraft carriers ONLY needed AFTER actions to get aid and assistance to areas OR to patrol. Should not, repeat not 🚫 be relied on for at tack.
The US has about 20 aircraft carriers fully armed and equipped and thats not even counting the battleships which make up the carrier strike group.
Ok. And?
11 aircraft carriers*.
@@Flightman453 correct. And the US Navy does not have any active battleships. Neither does any other navy.
But if you want to visit one the North Carolina battleship is in Wilmington NC.
The DRAGON is awekening.... BIG BRAVO CHINA !
India is China closest cousin. China will come to India's defence and vice versa.
🇨🇳🇷🇺🇮🇳😘💯💪💪💪
Go China !!! Go China !!! Please Use the new J35 with improved engines and radar system. And AI , Quantum Communication , etc being installed in the Fujian Carrier.
we have 21 aircraft carriers, and 10 in repairs but wartime ready. China has to build another 27 to reach parity. 50 years behind.
takes 50 years of running aircraft carriers to solve the bugs and gremlins. lets see how chinese ones do, as you can see russias did not fair well. Im sure tug boats will be travelling along side it for a while. The immense tonage does a real number on the engines .
Keep coping.
You do not have 31 aircraft carriers? What? Either way, carriers aren’t the only ships that matter. Keep thinking that.
Fujian is far superior than the american counterparts since the american can only catapult 25 tons which means the F35C can not be airborned fully loaded!
@@raymondwong3739 The F35 will top off with a tanker aircraft . And you are off by a few tons.
archive.aoe.vt.edu/mason/Mason_f/JSFS05.pdf
GOD BLESS CHINA 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
这是一个论证的问题，美国从很久以前重心就从俄罗斯转移到中国，不管是虚构某国实力以骗取国会资金也好，还是他们确确实实这么想的也好，结果是中国附近是五代机数量最多，美军基地最密集，给其盟友的五代机和中程导弹数量最多，以便应对所谓的威胁，如果我是班上第一名，就算是做做样子，目光也会聚焦在第二名，而不是其余的，军费由于us是帝国主义加上美元的霸权地位，长期占gdp的3.5%以上，中国只会是周边国家以及欧盟和北约国家中占比最少，只有1.5%，换句话说 美国需要庞大的开支这没错，可周边的us盟友基地国家，几乎都到3%或者4%了，虽然情况不太好，可我们没什么紧迫感，只是以最低gdp比例正常开支罢了，就这还是第二，远离第三，首先要知道，us8000多，近9000是很厉害，可这是3.5以上的。要是进入状态 哪怕只是达到北约标准的2%或者为应对真正威胁达到3.5%以上的开支，那么将是恐怖的，us的战略已经发生了几次改变，😂从印太司令的“由海向陆”到“滨海作战”再到“空海一体战”最后成为了“重返大洋”，😂最近印太司令帕帕罗又说了躲在大洋深处的舰艇以及各基地使用无人机来干预台海，“无人地狱”😂。希望他们有一个更好的计划，并在下一次需要战略转进的时候提出。我喜欢帕帕罗，迫不及待想要听听“无人地狱”后的又一个战略构思。
I love tofu dish ❤❤❤
Tofu dish has better capabilities than European carriers❤❤❤
@@LITTLEgiiant hahahaha Crazy copeheads ?
@@LITTLEgiiant How do you know ? Any sources ?
@@RectalRooter The fact that it's displacement is bigger, has more catapults and will field a 5th gen airwing over the Europeans make it super. Only behind the Nimitz/Ford carriers
@@LITTLEgiiant Ok. So no sources.
就博主封面的《现代舰船》2024、十月版，卖脱销了，因为某博主说可以收藏😂
Does the new Fujian carrier have submarine cable cutting capatibilty?😅
As usual the short term thinking West gets it wrong. Even if this carrier sucks it matters not because the Chinese will learn, make adjustments, refine and build a better one next time. Since China has an incredible manufacturing and industrial base I can guarantee that their next ship will be better and so forth. Look at the advancements made between their very first and most recent carrier the Fujian. Massive strides in terms of ability, size, technology and overall lethality have been made. They initially make baby steps then larger and more capable leaps over time while learning and gaining indispensable knowledge along the way until they are incredibly adept at it. Let's face it when it comes to STEM and other relevant studies the Chinese are a tremendous force.
An example of how they learn and eventually master an endeavour remember in their nascent foray into EVs years ago, the US excoriated the Chinese for making subpar vehicles. Fast forward two decades later and now no one is laughing at their capabilities. In fact the collective West is now panicking and becoming more protectionist with tariffs because they know they can't compete with China's EV cars. The Chinese are a 5000+ year old civilization not country and have accumulated true wisdom over the years.
Structural cracks indicate possible construction malpractices. The ship must be stressed to the point that it meets the calibrated design parameters vs actual data. From there, the ship engineers can determine if defects are inherently design flaws or mistakes committed during construction that can be corrected. Materials oxidize at different rates especially when exposed to temperature changes in the Pacific. Better to see how corrosion works on the ship while at port rather than discover potential failures at sea that can sink the ship. Ships fail all the time and the Pacific Ocean is a merciless master that has taken the lives of too many sailors.
As the first ship of her class, she must undergo testing set to high standards so that follow-on ships can be modified.
The emals system is a novel means of launching and recovering aircraft. But as for its reliability in operations with high tempo can be problematic and its operational success falls into the hands of mechanics.
In the middle of the ocean, it maybe a more practicable and safer method to have a ski-jump launch system for aircraft. With no moving parts, what can go wrong?
Talk a lot but all rubbish 😅
@@aungaisum8654 你只需要不停的肯定他的观点平且给他点赞
@vincentrivera743 There wasn't any cracks 😂
who did the heck tell you about structural cracks? ignorance and absurdness.
fuck usa fuck nato
I give it 4 years before it fall apart before full service
India's self built aircraft carrier is better
the only coal-fired carrier on earth !!
Oh, how cute. Let’s see them run flight deck ops at night, in the rain and snow, 3000 miles from their home port. I want to see 9,000 landings in six months. Till then, it’s a joke.
Keep coping. Carriers aren’t the only ships that matter. And idiots like you who speak about them as if they are just outing yourself as having zero military knowledge in the slightest. Keep huffing about for carriers as if for the cost of one US CVN, China couldn’t build 10+ 055s and finish them years before that carrier you keep talking about even leaves its dock for it’s first sea trials. Cope.
I can't tell if you are bashing China or your old job on an aircraft carrier.
They are American Aircraft Carriers, not "Super Carriers". Stop saying that silly stuff. US Navy recruiting is so bad that nearly 15% of the US Fleet isn't combat capable due to lack of trained Sailors. Nothing Super about our Fleet.
Super carrier is a term that refers to size, not quality of the ship or its crew. The Fujian is significantly larger than the Liaoning or the Shandong. The same is true when comparing the Nimitz and Ford Class carriers to older much smaller ones like the Forrestal class.
Well done China.
Investing money in carriers is a poor strategic choice for China. They’re nowhere near being able to project power like the US Navy and China is surrounded by potential enemies that would serve as bases for US aircraft in the event of conflict. China wouldn’t be able to break the blockade of the first island chain with 12 carriers. If China wanted to defend the South China Sea (like they say their goal is in a conflict) then investing money in submarines and anti-ship missile carrying aircraft, plus the tankers to fuel them and increase their effective range, would be their best bet. China’s whole problem is they’re surrounded by enemies and their actions are doing nothing to improve their situation. Militaries don’t win large scale conflicts, coalitions do. There is no conceivable scenario in which China wins a naval conflict against the U.S., Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Philippines.
Your mindset is quite outdated, apparently China's project power is quickly approaching to US
Filipinas não estão confirmadas, provavelmente a Rússia ajudará a china, patrulhando águas rasas assim deixando os navios maiores da china lutarem batalhas em mar aberto, a china não tem 3 porta aviões no pacífico ela Tam mais de 40 , cada ilha e reforçada com radares bases aéreas e portos , são dezenas de miniaturas de Guã em uma pequena área e todas podem ser reforçadas por plaaf assim agindo como porta aviões estáticos por todo aquele mar, a força aérea Russa ainda pode colocar mais aviões e sistemas anti aéreos em caso de uma guerra aumentando o poder de defesa e ataque do ELP
Thank you for two cents propagandized American. Now take your meds please.
@ America - fuck yeah! Freedom is the only way!
What's their point,built carrier.remember Japan before WW2 ......the largest navy after USA
So you mean they should build the largest Navy before USA?
window's seems closing for them. at that point, US and their asian allies would had the upper hand again. heck, this feels like pacific war 1941 all over again
Upper hand in what? In ship building? In industrial supply chain? Or in skilled labour? Ship building yards in S. Korea & Japan are in the range of Chinese missiles and bombing. USA was a industrial powerhouse prior to WWI and WWII, now all it got is dollars printing machines and worthless papers
Allies don't make allies sign plaza Accord
@@directxxxx71 its all as u said if they (China) determine for war before 2027 or 2025 fastest to force the allies on Chinese terms. above that, idk dude.
its gonna be a world-shaking war.
all it takes just an idiot in the Taiwan whom brave enough to consider independent statement
@@aj2228 He meant dogs.
US can't even maintain their ships, let alone building new ones. How exactly would they have the upper hand? By buying ships from China? Do you live under a rock since world war 2?
If China's navy is that strong,
why does China not have the ability to take Taiwan, which is so close to China?
Simple answer: Cause until now, they aren't strong enough to fight with US and other allies who can support Taiwan in the war. It won't be a duel but a world war, China need at least 8 carriers like Fujian to think about taking Taiwan
Because the defense target of mainland China is the United States, and Taiwan is a part of China. China = ROC + PRC.
If the United States is really the world's most powerful country, why didn't it conquer the whole world and defeat China?
Maybe China is not a war mongering nation, and would only go that way as a last resort.
Is it because the United States is unwilling to do this?
Unexperience sittng duck carrier😂
YES. Better to arrive after missiles, not before! Patrol, keep distance, then come.
Aka. The America class amphibious assault ship with its extremely short ranged f-35B fighters.
fuck usa fuck nato
Made in china build by temu 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
US with population of 300 million already has 11 operating aircraft carriers and at least 3000 combat fighter jets. China with a population of 1.3 billion people, needs to have at least 20 aircraft carriers and at least 5000 fighter jets to protect her people. Period. Way to go China. jiayou!
How many of the 11 carriers are operational at any time? How many of those 11 carriers will be decommissioned within 5 years? 😝
China is not a global military dominance mindset, so doesn’t need that much of carriers like the USA. China navy fleet is for sovereignty protection.
@@captives6479 He means well.
More lies about their paper aircraft carrier! What a joke!
Why dont white people talk about Daniel Duggan?
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩👍💪
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩👍💪