Matt Gaetz Grills Executive About Alleged Suppression Of Advertising On Conservative News Outlets
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
- At today's House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) questioned witnesses about about the alleged censorship of conservatives.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
Boycott Unilever
Shapiro? His name? His voice along sends chills up my spine.
I thought rightwingers loved the free market>?
Therefore the right to buy or not to buy.
@@monotech20.14 are you guys capable of engaging in thought?
We do! Tyrannical Censorship for Election Interference & hiding under " free market" all the While they have the Entire Monopoly over Advertisng @@monotech20.14
I quit Facebook over the anti Trump restrictions.
They should change everything lol😂. Dope
@@JHT42469 Unless they want a McVeigh special parked in their HQ, yes.
@@JHT42469unlike you this person who deleted fb has a certain standard that they won't change, you will vote for Biden knowing that the Ashley Biden diary is true and that is only 1 of millions of things that were once conspiracy but now true also....DO you remember the debate because Biden didn't the day after!!!
And I'm sure Facebook is crushed over your exit.
I thought rightwingers loved the free market>?
Unilever shouldn't be in this country point blank.
I thought rightwingers loved the free market>?
How many times are you going to keep copying/pasting "I thought rightwingers loved the free market?"
Is that the limit of your vocabulary? Never mind, don't answer that. We already know.
@monotech20.14 when you think, does it hurt 🤣
@@monotech20.14what does the free market have to do with suppression speech?
@@pleaseclap5210 Maybe you should have listened to the whole hearing. Companies NOT wanting to give ad revenue to rightwing orgs or media is not censorship.
"That's a great answer to a question I didn't ask."
Thank God for exposing these sleazy people
Yea, but sadly, there is nothing going to be done! Ppl are losing total faith in out judiciary system😢
Remove section 230 so we can sue them out of business!!
Section 230 isn't the problem. The courts intentionally misinterpreting and making bad rulings on section 230 is. Changing the law won't solve the problem of out of control courts.
There is No Right to use the internet and there is no expectation of privacy using the internet. Don't like it? Don't use it.
There is No Right to privacy or Free Speech on the internet. PERIOD.
@@justwanderin847what ruling supports your claim?
@@pleaseclap5210 There does not have to be a ruling on every aspect of life. If you have a Right to the internet, Where is That claim?
@@pleaseclap5210 So there was this guy in Colorado who had a bakery and didn't like gays..... I don't suppose that's ringing a bell?
Maybe when Hobby Lobby didn't want to pay for some health care for its employees, how bout that one?
Even without the expanded rights corporations received all they had to do is simply say that it was not in their company's best interest to air anything they don't want. "After review we determined that airing such an ad could hurt revenue due to potential backlash".
How is this not borderline criminal ?
it is...borderline
It's not borderline, it is criminal. They're breaking the law.
Because they did not out right say to censor they were vague communicating through multiple parties concluding what to so censor . But everyone knew what was being said. Granted sometimes based on the laws and regulations and nature of it, people truly acted in a bias way that had bias results. Uniliver doesn’t favor a party they care about money and advoiding regulations
An actual conspiracy…conspiring. Not just a theory
Considering that the godfather of leftist ideology outright advocated for censorship among many other horrific unAmerican ideas, it's obviously not a conspiracy theory and is a tactic explicitly prescribed by those who claim that leftism is better than Americanism.
I thought rightwingers loved the free market>?
@@monotech20.14 Americans at heart love free markets along with our other founding American values and principles, regardless of whether leftists agree or not.
@@monotech20.14 since when is the voluntary exchange of goods and services the same as censoring political speech?
@@monotech20.14businesses colluding to propagandize on behalf of 1 political party isn’t a free market? In fact it’s unironically a form of fascism. I.e. merger of corporate and state power.
I will not be buying any Unilever products. I share Trump adds. Trump 2024 !
Yes you will
Waaaaahhhh!!!!
Hard to do...so many products fall under Unilever. I aim to try my best, but literally hundreds of brands, let alone products, are listed on Unilever's website. 😮
Good luck. They own almost everything we have in the US when it comes to a ton of categories.
@@sm3995 Unless you make your own or go to a source, this idea that OP has is meaningless. Every major corporation has some form of this in the fabric of their make up now.
Anti-Democracy RICO
Boycott
$800 million for yearly advertising. Why???
850 Million at that ,,,,😮 unreal
To use as a lever to pressure political opponents via the private sector. Just as they said.
Brainwashed the masses with Marxist propaganda and population control. Both the media and government are cognitive experts on human behavior they know how "words" can shape reality.
keeping the unwashed masses of a whole planet brainwashed aint cheap, bud.
Because they made their customers billions of utility back
"Whoever controls the media controls the mind ": Jim Morrison (The Doors) circa 1969
HES JUMPING AROUND IN HES CHAIR LOOKS WERY CLEAR!!! HES A CROCK AS THE REST !!!
Great question!
Stop these/any companies playing politics, dei...
I miss having open, unbiased conversation without it randomly being deleted for no reason
So do I. I'm amazed at how fast it changed.
Im still trying to figure out the keywords here on youtube that autodeletes my comments.
My verbiage is very tame and I rarely, if ever, cuss yet some comments I see that remain up are genuinely filled with hate and at times threats.
@@Carlos559Caps Anything with too much truth.
It has begun comrades
I've been watching this live, the Democrats keep saying that we're wasting taxpayer money and taxpayer time. Anytime Democrats put that forward, you know it's hitting near the heart of the truth
One of the problems with our system os that it is very easy to play stupid for 5 minutes.
Pull back the curtain and let the public see the corruption.
Lov matt
So true. They have sone me wrong Instagram has tryed to stopped me from apeaking up. They keep taking my opinion off. Thank you dor fighting for our first amendment Right . ❤❤❤❤❤
I thought rightwingers loved the free market>?
@monotech20.14 I thought left wingers were inclusive?
@monotech20.14 free market is supposed to put the power in the hands of the consumers. It is corrupt for companies to join forces to enforce what the government isn't allowed to.
@@nm-hd8rr Thats not what is happening here. You didn't even listen to the hearing, you don't know what you are talking about.
@monotech20.14 the title of the hearing was “Collusion in the Global Alliance for Responsible Media.” In your opinion, what was the hearing about? The Sherman Antitrust Act protects consumers and businesses from this sort of action, to help protect the "free marker" from business alliances taking this kind of power.
How did they get that one water bottle to float over the other water bottle?
It is called depth perception :P
Glitch in the matrix
Lmao right as I looked at this comment I looked up and was like wtf
It is called “InfoWars”, imo.
Why didn't he have the person there that did it?
Well said Ben.
I thought rightwingers loved the free market>?
@@monotech20.14 When did left wingers endorse Fascism?
Looks like Ben’s bottles are stacked
Yes! I kept getting distracted by those water bottles.
One is on the chair camera angle is perfect
Hahahahaha I was staring at that and even paused it!
List the products of unilever so we can boycott them by not buyer their products.
I googled unilever brands and added them all to my "never buy" list, then forwarded them to over 2 million in my veterans groups. Done.
No foreign owned/managed business’ should be allowed to operate in the US
Did anyone else notice the stacked water bottles ??
HELLO HERE WE GO. HOW MUCH DO THEY CONTROL AND JUST LIKE THE SCJEMS PROFIT ON DEATH.
the unilever guy seems like a shifty coward
Unfortunately P&G too and the list goes on and on. Take your money elsewhere and call them out on social media platforms. They keep their eyes on what’s said on social media platforms about them.
It's awesome Gaetz used a Trey Gowdy comeback! I miss him! "Fascinating answer just not to my question". Gowdy used that as a comeback at times. Too bad he's not still in Congress, nobody got anything by him!
Thank you for this information
Im glad at least one congressman is asking the simple yet hard questions and throwing it back in their face when they filibuster! Go Gaetz!
That nato commercial was a hoot before this video played lmfao. Foh
That's why I never got a FB account. Sick em Matt.
GARM = WEF
You go Matt 😊
Love GAETZ and Shapiro
Good job Ben
Biden had an earpiece, I saw him tapping his ear a couple times
Ben is wanting to "just ask questions". LMAO
The bottle at 4:20 looks like its levitating over the bottle on the table.
Stop buying Bryer's ice cream and Unilever will get the message
Let's make up a crisis!!!!!
Go guys . Love it
Let’s goooo!!
It should be a violation of campaign finance law
boycott unilever
NEVER do business with a Patel!! This is Exhibit A; Patel Deception in Real Time
Should be a Law... Evidentiary Suspicious Testimony...! Put Them on a Time out in the corner..! Until we can get to the bottom of the Issue...
False advertising is a crime. Slander is a crime. Defamation of character is a crime.
Paid for by big oil.
Silencing you proves not that they are right or that you are wrong, it is simply a method of control.
Why isn’t he in Texas helping his constituents affected by the Hurricane?
Ben + Matt = (as Rick James would say) cold blooded 😎🤘🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Two things are a given with these hearings at this point:
a) Americans with their head on straight will find out they were right in their suspicions all along, though not by direct admission
b) they will go to bed tonight, wake up tomorrow and shove it down the Memory Hole, and nothing will be done about it
Most advertisers avoid extremism and good for them.
What companies so we know not to do business with them
A whole lot of “grilling” but nothing ever gets cooked!
Unilever owns Ben & Jerrys. That's all you need to know.
What products does Unilever sell. And what are alternatives we can buy?
Why does this guy look like jack nicholson?
❤❤❤
jeez i almost forgot about matt gaetz
Too short!!
there's no way any company can be a-political..Impossible..if it's the truth..adherance to truth is a political choice..a good one
They might not be able to be apolitical, but they do have the ability to put good business practices above political messaging.
Alleged, nothing alleged about it!
Just fascinating as how bias from both sides dance around the actionable violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The parade of criminals on both sides, and in front of the cameras is amaziong in how stupid they confess to their violations.and crimes. Amazing. .
I am independent voter but i delleted my facebook , seeing how they promoted Clinton and liberals .i wanted to see both political nominee not pushing their agenda of democrats to me
Unimpeded shouldn't be in this country point black
Unilever has multiple child abuse symbols in their logo
I'm not sure the democrat party will ever recover from this. They have been caught on so many levels now, there's no way they can rebuild their brand.
More brands than Unilever which is HQ is in Europe
Check his bank account... Follow the money
Follow the political donations and monies these companies receive for pushing agendas developed by the government, like DEI and ESG. It is one massive collusion scam.
eventually one of these STERN TALKING-TOs is going to get them to clean up their acts!
So 1st thing. Congress must make new laws in 2025 that during oversite over any agency mandated buy the constitution, personnel WILL answer questions to the satisfaction of the over site committees. They may not answer " cant comment on ongoing investigation, I am the head of agency but I don't know. We have taking corrective actions but we are not able to tell you what that is or who was terminated."
No more obfuscation. If need be go into a skiff so oversite is properly conducted to protect U.S. citizens from lawfare. STOP NOW
"I don't know the intent of that communication".... Gaetz: "it is to remove a Trump Ad" ......"I still don't understand the intent of the communication" .... WTF is wrong with that guy!
Nothing alleged about it. They did everything in their power to kill the Laptop story.
Funny how nothing will ever be done except posturing, rnc is weak
Ben Shapiro: Excellent articulation and soooooo intelligent
I love it
There's about a five second delay from my ears to my brain when I listen to Ben Shapiro!
Both sides try to limit free speech. Facebook tbh doesn’t care politically what gets posted as long as it makes them money and gets them engagement and data.
No leftists
So businesses colluding to control media bad. Businesses buying politicians okay. Lmfao
Say what you will.... Shapiro is a smart man !
FB IS AT IT AGAIN, IMO
Is Ben a magician, check the way he makes a bottle hover over another bottle at his desk on his left. 3:38
❤❤❤😂😂😂😢😢😢
Who's the girl sitting behind Ben on the left? 😍☝️
Sophisticated, propaganda !!!! Buyers be ware.....
Charge them. That's what the Democrats would do. Quarter of a billion dollars will do.
Charlie Kirk!! What a projectionist.
advertiser's are private companies and facebook is a private company, and can accept or reject any ad they like. Leave them alone and CUT THE TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT
But Mr Patel says his company is "apolitical".
You know what apolitical means?
@@wizzard5442 Yes, still they are free to support or not support anything they wish.
Will you support porn advertising on Liberal news outlets?
They file and receive big tax deductions for being news providers. Twitter did too.
@@justwanderin847 apolitical means having nothing to do with or be involved with politics.
But two vice-presidents disapproved a Trump advertisement of which I assume was of a political nature.
Gaetz talking to actual fascists: socialism merged with corporatism.
Matt Gaetz 2028
Fascinating answer just not for my question.......epic
*Doesn't this mean Truth Social is in violation of exactly what they're accusing them of?*
227