The classic designs are truly iconic, but the new ones are the definition of "perfect modernization", they blend the classic feel with a modern edge, and it's just *chef's kiss* perfect.
They couldve rounded off the heads of huwey dewey and louie and couldve given louie his iconic hat back. Give Scrooge McDuck his original color scheme and there wouldnt be any complaints from me. Before you react its just my thoughts on the matter nothing more nothing less. As was stated apart from a couple grievances I had with the 2017 rendition of DuckTales overall the 1987 and 2017 versions would be something to watch with either you kids or nieces and nephews as you go throughout the cosmos with the group going from one adventure to another
The 2017 triplets are just imposters being passed off as the real characters with the mentality that their true classic selves are "problematic". No one who wants to like them better could call themselves a real fan.
You can tell the research was put in when you get even characters NOT from the original Ducktales. Seeing Max and Roxanne at the end was nice as that shows they're still kept fondly.
I think this show, of all the many reboots/revivals i’ve seen, might just be the best executed of the bunch. It elegantly modernizes and streamlines all the elements of the original, from the characters to the storyline, adding a more serialized narrative that fits right in with the animated series of its (at the time) current era. All the while, it stays true to the spirit of the original, that sense of wonder and adventure that captivated so many. I actually just started to rewatch it with my stepmom and little half-sister not too long ago. The reboot came out when i was 12 so in a lot of ways, i grew up with it, my stepmom grew up watching the original series, and now my 5 year old half sister gets to grow up on it too! That’s 3 separate generations of people able to just sit down and enjoy a cartoon together! That right there is freakin magical, and what all revivals should aspire to.
In my opinion, the original DuckTales marked the beginning of the golden age of western animation. The DuckTales to Ben 10 era was the glory days of animation!
And yet there are now people who would want to see the original's contributions be overshadowed by a cheaper reboot that arguably doesn't need to exist.
1. I really glad to see Daisy Duck in the DuckTales reboot unlike the original DuckTales and unlike her other appearances in old visions, her appearance in the DuckTales reboot shows her that she’s very nice and very kind to Donald and his family and she can understand him perfectly and she actually likes his singing and she loves him very much. 2. I like when April, May and June are Daisy’s nieces better.
I had forgotten, the triplets are really different characters without departing from the stereotypes of the originals Webby (rosita in Spanish) has a more significant role from the beginning instead of just being "the girl of the group",1Besides, I love how the relationship with Uncle Scrooge grows because it is obvious that with the arrival of the triplets, he opened up more to other people. Although I didn't like it 100% now you are literally a killing machine. I only remember the episode where he tells her "This is a family matter, YOU ARE NOT FAMILY"In where Della's mystery is revealed and my heart only breaks Della finally exists, I just adore how they treated her, she's not just a character who stopped being interesting after her mystery ended And Donald...GOD HOW I LOVE DONALD IN THIS VERSION, I JUST LOVE THAT HE'S THE DAD THAT CHILDREN CLEARLY SOMETIMES DO NOT APPRECIATE,But he loves them as they are and they love him for who he is. An angry duck who wants to keep his family together after so much time apart.
Webby, Gyro, Della, Fergus, Matilda, Daisy, Phoey, and the triplets look a lot better in the 2017 version in my opinion. It’s so much easier to tell them apart
Even though it comes off as trying to cram them all into some kind of a shared universe with more thought going into playing up nostalgia if anything. As much as I loved all the Disney Afternoon shows of the 90s I was not taking the nostalgia bait here when all they were doing is reducing all those other shows to the same cheap artistic standards they've already been reducing DuckTales to, when a large part of why I did love the Disney Afternoon shows in the first place was not just for the characters but for how much Disney was putting into the visual quality of their TV animation back *then* compared to how much this reboot shamelessly stripped away from it. Sometimes people nowadays seem to completely miss the point as far as assuming it's enough to just bring back older animated properties and characters as if their nostalgic reputation alone is enough, when what people like myself had really been clamoring for is for us to be putting out more new 2D cartoons that are drawn and animated *as good* as the kind we were producing back in the 90s or even the early 2000s, but sadly that can't be expected with the creative mentality of people like the ones behind 2017 DuckTales.
This is really a big number of Disney characters appearing in these two DuckTales series. I also remember many characters and the way they are designed and also their behavior. It is a wonderful series. I am still amused in a big extent about all those crossovers that appear in the new DuckTales series. But by seeing all this you definitely notice the fact, that this production really is popular and is loved by a big amount of humans. The time difference of these two series generations is thirty years. That really shows how much so many people love DuckTales. And I love it too. ❤💛💚💙
They only make obvious reference to Goof Troop as far as giving him his exact clothes from that series, but they butchered how Goofy is supposed to be drawn in official Disney animation the same way that they did for every other classic animated Disney character they had appear under this reboot's crappy aesthetic. BTW, Goof Troop and A Goofy Movie are still perfect textbook examples of how Disney is meant to keep their classic characters feeling more modern and relevant in animation the right way. By putting them in more modern settings and situations while keeping them the same as you remember in terms of their characterization and design, not through drastic overhauls that fly right in the face of how these timeless characters were always being portrayed by Disney.
Realmente ducktales de 2017 ha logrado crear un universo muy muy amplio,juntando las series de rescue rangers,aventureros del aire,goofy movie (y en mi opinion también la serie de goofy trop),pato darwing,los 3 caballeros y quien sabe talves también mickey mouse y el resto de sus amigos.La verdad una lastima que no exploraran esos aspectos por su cancelación.
I read a weekly Dutch Duck comic magazine that has stories from the US as well as various European countries. In general, the art style has remained closer to what was seen in the 80's Ducktales. Softer, curvier line work. Characters of the same species looking more like eachother (though some italian stories in a monthly book series are really pushing some boundries). Going by looks alone, the recent series doesn't appeal to me that much. But story-wise and in light of world building, I've been hearing good things, some of the casting choices are interesting... so I still might give this show a look into.
1987 has better design, better voices, better animation studio, better writing and more respect to the characters. Ruining and dumbing down Beagle boys, Gloomgold and Stealbeak especially was too much to be ignored.
You stayed in the past when the new one is better in many things, although I do support the old one more but we should not only base it on tastes. Personal
@@Manqueo_DubsBoth have bad and good aspects but in the 2017 series the former surpass the latter. This is a series taking more inspiration from the newer TV cartoons and anime narratives rather than the comics. In that respect it is a good series, but not much to do with Ducktales and Carl Bark's characters, which the 1987 series is kinda more faithful. Though to its credit it was a much better effort than what they did to the 3 Caballeros
@@petr79 Well, the originals are obviously more faithful but of course with the advances in technology they will obviously look a little better in the new one but everyone has their own tastes.
It's always good to find at least *some* people online who haven't lost all their senses ever buying into this BS. It can be all too easy with how much nostalgia-baiting the reboot has, but the way I see it anyone who's ever truly cared about these classic animated Disney cartoons would care about them for the real quality they had put into them by Disney from an artistic perspective.
@@Manqueo_Dubs How naïve to ever assume that anything is going to always be better through technology, when from my own views on our 2D television animation over the years that has not been the case. Traditional 2D animation itself was never about "technology" or "computers" as much as it was at its core the pure art of bringing animated characters to life through a pencil and paper. And I've only seen how much today's "technology" have hindered the quality of our more modern 2D cartoons by substituting hand-drawn animation for awkwardly mechanical feeling puppet-rigged animations done through computers. As much as any of our animators today might try to say that it makes their work "easier" and "more convenient" that doesn't necessary mean that the quality has truly been better. In general it's technology that's even been threatening to take the place of traditional animation as a form of art altogether ever since studios started pushing for CGI to take the place of those type of animated movies. It was always a different thing when CGI was used simply as a tool to enhance the art of hand-drawn animated movies like the ones Disney made in the 90s, but when CG animated movies like Pixar's started being made into a corporate agenda in Hollywood to replace hand-drawn that is when it crossed the line.
@@StareCoyotes I watched new ducktales and saying after that. Worst thing is that they made their faces square.......which duck has square faces??? Weby girl looks super cute in old....now see her. Homekeeper Mrs Beekly looks like wardan now.....I like high quality graphics but not change with original characters.
@@gpl_ but you have to accept that the new one's designs are simply better They are literally years apart from the old one and obviously it will have better animation than in the old days although both old and new are very good series
I do like Gandra Dee’s new personality a lot better in the 2017 series. The original version was one of those blonde bimbo stereotypes. Plus she has more in common with Fenton than the original version.
To even be labeling the 1987 designs as "old" only greater emphasizes the problematic nature of this reboot's very existence, because the style of 1987 DuckTales was, in general, Disney's officially established in-house 2D animation style that any of their cartoons are arguably *meant* to be in, especially their most classically rooted and influenced ones like most of their original Disney Afternoon shows of that era. Whether it's DuckTales, Chip 'n Dale, or perhaps most of all Mickey Mouse, no one working in Disney animation today should *EVER* be allowed to be messing around with or perverting Disney's classic animation style when it's not theirs to mess with. A large part of why I've greatly detested some of the most recent animated appearances of these classic Disney characters is for how much they've taken away from and diminished the artistic quality they already had when they should have otherwise been left alone, and the Disney we have today should be above ever letting that happen in the first place.
The larger problem as I've seen it is that Disney's artistic standards for 2D animation had simply gone to rot, especially with the abandonment of their 2D feature animation in favor of pushing CGI. Growing up on Disney animation in the 90s I know for myself that their standards used to be much higher for what they wanted put into their 2D animated cartoons even within the smaller television market. Even Disneytoon Studios put out animated work more superior to the type of cartoons Disney Television Animation have been putting out for the last decade, but it was John Lasseter who had the studio shut down based on his own bias that he didn't like their direct-to-video projects. Point is I don't feel that a lot of what's been done with these classic Disney characters and properties like Mickey & Friends under the current regime would have ever gotten by as easily with the Disney I knew. Their characters had to be portrayed consistently across all their official media, drawn and animated up to a specific standard in their own specific animation style, while wanting to maintain how we knew some of these characters in the times of Walt Disney himself. The modern Disney management of Bob Iger has had much less real standards for that sort of thing anymore from what I've noticed. They just let any of those rules be thrown out the window and ignored, when those rules were always arguably for the best for their classic characters and their 2D animation.
This is whats wrong with the world people don't know how to leave well enough alone, studio's just don't get enough of remaking things from the past that was perfect and then screwing them up
And I'm glad someone can have the sense to apply this to DuckTales as well. The Disney Afternoon shows were still some of the highest standard of TV animation Disney had ever put out IMO, and all this reboot really achieved with their crammed-in nostalgic exploitation of these shows is making them all look worse when otherwise this reboot could have never existed at all and these shows could still be remembered fondly on their own, including DuckTales. Sadly some people just want to care more about seeing these older cartoons again in general, in any capacity, than about whatever quality went into these cartoons originally from an animation standpoint and what kind we should still be wanting to see going into them today.
I prefer the old ones, they look more appealing. The new ones look too stiff and they have too many edges to them, if anyone tried to hug them they'd get hurt. Sonic has less edges to him and he's a hedgehog, he just has edges at his back.
@@caitlincabzz0918 Just the artstyle? You almost make it sound as if it doesn't matter. Would you still watch the show if the designs were done by Rob Liefeld? And for the record, it's not just the artstyle I dislike. I also dislike the voices of Huey, Louie and Dewey, they sound too adult and not childish enough. I also don't like how they made Launchpad and Flintheart dumber than what feels necessary.
@@JadenYukiSliferVermelho but he is obviously right to be A current product is going to have much higher quality than the old school but of course that does not mean that one is better but in this case it is difficult
@@Manqueo_Dubs "A current product is going to have much higher quality than the old school" Tom and Jerry being inserted and looking wonky in Wonka's chocolate factory, the later cartoons with Woody Woodpecker looking really cheap and Woody looking unappealing in CGI form in the feature films, Yogi Bear and the Ninja Turtles also looking unappealing in CGI, newer seasons of Family Guy and The Simpsons being bland and forgettable, Velma being rather unlikable as the main character in her show, ReBoot: The Guardian Code having weak plots and characters, Metroid: Other M doing a disfavour to the character of Samus Aran with its story, The Lord of the Rings: Gollum and Skull Island: Rise of Kong being filled with bugs... Not saying newer products can't be good (e.g. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem, Metroid Dread and the newer Sonic games all got great reception), but thinking that newer products is automatically going to have higher quality is, well, not smart.
@@Tommy_Grenlund Here we were talking about the largest company in the world of animation and it was mainly talking about Reboot of duck adventures that does have better animation but to be kind I put it at his level wmyig Besides, it is not difficult to deny that the new animation is abysmally superior to the old one Or are you going to say that into the Spider Verse and across the Spiderverse along with the Ninja Turtles movie are not the products with the best animation in recent years? Modern animation is abysmally superior and to begin with I was talking about the animation of this enormous company and how it did a good reboot of its old version, destroying it in animation and the intro is t Totally better
The new ones are a lot better in my opinion they give of more emotions and you can tell what kind of person they are judging from how they look while 1987 takes a more cutesy style ware the boys don’t look that much different while in 2017 they have certain differences
If you're going to criticize the 1987 series for looking "too cutesy" then you just don't see the charm and appeal of Disney's true style of animation, which some of the more modern stuff like this and Paul Rudish's Mickey Mouse have sucked away and tarnished.
@@nicksorenson940 I’ve watched 1987 and 2017 version of DuckTales and enjoyed both of them. I’m just not one of those people that’s blinded by nostalgia.
The classic designs are truly iconic, but the new ones are the definition of "perfect modernization", they blend the classic feel with a modern edge, and it's just *chef's kiss* perfect.
They couldve rounded off the heads of huwey dewey and louie and couldve given louie his iconic hat back. Give Scrooge McDuck his original color scheme and there wouldnt be any complaints from me. Before you react its just my thoughts on the matter nothing more nothing less. As was stated apart from a couple grievances I had with the 2017 rendition of DuckTales overall the 1987 and 2017 versions would be something to watch with either you kids or nieces and nephews as you go throughout the cosmos with the group going from one adventure to another
You don't "modernize" what had already been Disney's officially established animation style by that point.
I like the 2017 triplets because you can tell who’s who ( not by the color)
It feels like Dewey is the main character of the triplets.
The 2017 triplets are just imposters being passed off as the real characters with the mentality that their true classic selves are "problematic". No one who wants to like them better could call themselves a real fan.
You can tell the research was put in when you get even characters NOT from the original Ducktales. Seeing Max and Roxanne at the end was nice as that shows they're still kept fondly.
Gyro gearloose is more happy in 1987 than 2017
Yeah
iirc there was a flashback in the 2017 ducktales where Gyro is shown to have been happier in the past, very much like his 1987 version.
They are equally as good just like their shows
I think this show, of all the many reboots/revivals i’ve seen, might just be the best executed of the bunch. It elegantly modernizes and streamlines all the elements of the original, from the characters to the storyline, adding a more serialized narrative that fits right in with the animated series of its (at the time) current era. All the while, it stays true to the spirit of the original, that sense of wonder and adventure that captivated so many.
I actually just started to rewatch it with my stepmom and little half-sister not too long ago. The reboot came out when i was 12 so in a lot of ways, i grew up with it, my stepmom grew up watching the original series, and now my 5 year old half sister gets to grow up on it too! That’s 3 separate generations of people able to just sit down and enjoy a cartoon together! That right there is freakin magical, and what all revivals should aspire to.
By the way, lena is the equivalent of spell minima, in canon they are considered its equivalent
Don't forget Magica De Spell's Shadow
I still have love all the old one
all the villains got such a glow up tho like now they slaying especially glomgold 💅
New version they look so diferent,I love it,Besides, I also like that you can differentiate the triplets.
Both versions are great, but I personally prefer the original.
The old was the absolute BEST!
In my opinion, the original DuckTales marked the beginning of the golden age of western animation. The DuckTales to Ben 10 era was the glory days of animation!
😢😢🎉
And yet there are now people who would want to see the original's contributions be overshadowed by a cheaper reboot that arguably doesn't need to exist.
Everybody: i wasnt só diferent
Gyro, Della, Lil Bulb, Gladstone Fenton, Office Cabrera, Duckworth, Doofus, Goldie, Djinn, Genie, Gandra, Gosalyn, Molly, Flintheart, Beagle, Ma Beagle, Mágica, Rockerduck, Jeeves, Don Karnage, Bulba, Bushroot, Phantom Blot, FOWL, Roxanne and Matilda: 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
1. I really glad to see Daisy Duck in the DuckTales reboot unlike the original DuckTales and unlike her other appearances in old visions, her appearance in the DuckTales reboot shows her that she’s very nice and very kind to Donald and his family and she can understand him perfectly and she actually likes his singing and she loves him very much.
2. I like when April, May and June are Daisy’s nieces better.
I had forgotten, the triplets are really different characters without departing from the stereotypes of the originals
Webby (rosita in Spanish) has a more significant role from the beginning instead of just being "the girl of the group",1Besides, I love how the relationship with Uncle Scrooge grows because it is obvious that with the arrival of the triplets, he opened up more to other people.
Although I didn't like it 100% now you are literally a killing machine.
I only remember the episode where he tells her "This is a family matter, YOU ARE NOT FAMILY"In where Della's mystery is revealed and my heart only breaks
Della finally exists, I just adore how they treated her, she's not just a character who stopped being interesting after her mystery ended
And Donald...GOD HOW I LOVE DONALD IN THIS VERSION, I JUST LOVE THAT HE'S THE DAD THAT CHILDREN CLEARLY SOMETIMES DO NOT APPRECIATE,But he loves them as they are and they love him for who he is.
An angry duck who wants to keep his family together after so much time apart.
Ngl I like the new ones more
I enjoy the original DuckTales, but the 2017 reboot is the best reboot I’m so glad they redone it
Webby, Gyro, Della, Fergus, Matilda, Daisy, Phoey, and the triplets look a lot better in the 2017 version in my opinion. It’s so much easier to tell them apart
I love how the whole Disney universe is tied together in ducktales
Even though it comes off as trying to cram them all into some kind of a shared universe with more thought going into playing up nostalgia if anything. As much as I loved all the Disney Afternoon shows of the 90s I was not taking the nostalgia bait here when all they were doing is reducing all those other shows to the same cheap artistic standards they've already been reducing DuckTales to, when a large part of why I did love the Disney Afternoon shows in the first place was not just for the characters but for how much Disney was putting into the visual quality of their TV animation back *then* compared to how much this reboot shamelessly stripped away from it.
Sometimes people nowadays seem to completely miss the point as far as assuming it's enough to just bring back older animated properties and characters as if their nostalgic reputation alone is enough, when what people like myself had really been clamoring for is for us to be putting out more new 2D cartoons that are drawn and animated *as good* as the kind we were producing back in the 90s or even the early 2000s, but sadly that can't be expected with the creative mentality of people like the ones behind 2017 DuckTales.
What about Bonkers? He made a cameo in the darkwing duck episode (the one from season 3)
This is really a big number of Disney characters appearing in these two DuckTales series. I also remember many characters and the way they are designed and also their behavior. It is a wonderful series. I am still amused in a big extent about all those crossovers that appear in the new DuckTales series. But by seeing all this you definitely notice the fact, that this production really is popular and is loved by a big amount of humans. The time difference of these two series generations is thirty years. That really shows how much so many people love DuckTales. And I love it too. ❤💛💚💙
Who thinks goofy’s design in ducktales looks identical to goof troop
Which one????
@@enderjammer5035 the goofy on the right does it look like goof troop to you along with max?
They only make obvious reference to Goof Troop as far as giving him his exact clothes from that series, but they butchered how Goofy is supposed to be drawn in official Disney animation the same way that they did for every other classic animated Disney character they had appear under this reboot's crappy aesthetic.
BTW, Goof Troop and A Goofy Movie are still perfect textbook examples of how Disney is meant to keep their classic characters feeling more modern and relevant in animation the right way. By putting them in more modern settings and situations while keeping them the same as you remember in terms of their characterization and design, not through drastic overhauls that fly right in the face of how these timeless characters were always being portrayed by Disney.
Realmente ducktales de 2017 ha logrado crear un universo muy muy amplio,juntando las series de rescue rangers,aventureros del aire,goofy movie (y en mi opinion también la serie de goofy trop),pato darwing,los 3 caballeros y quien sabe talves también mickey mouse y el resto de sus amigos.La verdad una lastima que no exploraran esos aspectos por su cancelación.
I read a weekly Dutch Duck comic magazine that has stories from the US as well as various European countries. In general, the art style has remained closer to what was seen in the 80's Ducktales. Softer, curvier line work. Characters of the same species looking more like eachother (though some italian stories in a monthly book series are really pushing some boundries). Going by looks alone, the recent series doesn't appeal to me that much. But story-wise and in light of world building, I've been hearing good things, some of the casting choices are interesting... so I still might give this show a look into.
Classico winner for 5 season
Bentina got some glow up
The actual ones looks so nice^^
I'm sincerely hoping you mean the *actual* actual ones, namely the ones who came first and never asked to be done over.
1987 has better design, better voices, better animation studio, better writing and more respect to the characters. Ruining and dumbing down Beagle boys, Gloomgold and Stealbeak especially was too much to be ignored.
You stayed in the past when the new one is better in many things, although I do support the old one more but we should not only base it on tastes. Personal
@@Manqueo_DubsBoth have bad and good aspects but in the 2017 series the former surpass the latter. This is a series taking more inspiration from the newer TV cartoons and anime narratives rather than the comics. In that respect it is a good series, but not much to do with Ducktales and Carl Bark's characters, which the 1987 series is kinda more faithful. Though to its credit it was a much better effort than what they did to the 3 Caballeros
@@petr79 Well, the originals are obviously more faithful but of course with the advances in technology they will obviously look a little better in the new one but everyone has their own tastes.
It's always good to find at least *some* people online who haven't lost all their senses ever buying into this BS. It can be all too easy with how much nostalgia-baiting the reboot has, but the way I see it anyone who's ever truly cared about these classic animated Disney cartoons would care about them for the real quality they had put into them by Disney from an artistic perspective.
@@Manqueo_Dubs How naïve to ever assume that anything is going to always be better through technology, when from my own views on our 2D television animation over the years that has not been the case. Traditional 2D animation itself was never about "technology" or "computers" as much as it was at its core the pure art of bringing animated characters to life through a pencil and paper. And I've only seen how much today's "technology" have hindered the quality of our more modern 2D cartoons by substituting hand-drawn animation for awkwardly mechanical feeling puppet-rigged animations done through computers. As much as any of our animators today might try to say that it makes their work "easier" and "more convenient" that doesn't necessary mean that the quality has truly been better.
In general it's technology that's even been threatening to take the place of traditional animation as a form of art altogether ever since studios started pushing for CGI to take the place of those type of animated movies. It was always a different thing when CGI was used simply as a tool to enhance the art of hand-drawn animated movies like the ones Disney made in the 90s, but when CG animated movies like Pixar's started being made into a corporate agenda in Hollywood to replace hand-drawn that is when it crossed the line.
I dont say the reboot is bad but i just like the original ducktales because it was my childhood
I was thinking of making a new TV show called Webby and Gosalyn starring Kate Micucci and Stephanie Beatriz
4:45 Sweet design of Negaduck there. :)
Anyway; Who hugged Negaduck?
the old nes had charm so that why it wins in my book
Old one is better.
Love from Bharat 🇮🇳❤️
Creo que tienes razón... Saludos!
I agree with you
Bro the new one is better you just have nostalgia that's why
@@StareCoyotes I watched new ducktales and saying after that. Worst thing is that they made their faces square.......which duck has square faces??? Weby girl looks super cute in old....now see her. Homekeeper Mrs Beekly looks like wardan now.....I like high quality graphics but not change with original characters.
@@gpl_ but you have to accept that the new one's designs are simply better They are literally years apart from the old one and obviously it will have better animation than in the old days although both old and new are very good series
I do like Gandra Dee’s new personality a lot better in the 2017 series. The original version was one of those blonde bimbo stereotypes. Plus she has more in common with Fenton than the original version.
Original one is much closer to the comics are they not? In my opinion definitely the better version. Crazy show, but amazing.
It's funny because Beckly was thick
Omg! What HAVE they done to it? 😱 yikes. Will stick with the old one for sure.
A wise choice.
Mi infancia 😊
People: arguing
Me: they had no business making Fares such a giga-chad! (Sad we didn't see much of him in the show fr he's my favourite character)
To even be labeling the 1987 designs as "old" only greater emphasizes the problematic nature of this reboot's very existence, because the style of 1987 DuckTales was, in general, Disney's officially established in-house 2D animation style that any of their cartoons are arguably *meant* to be in, especially their most classically rooted and influenced ones like most of their original Disney Afternoon shows of that era.
Whether it's DuckTales, Chip 'n Dale, or perhaps most of all Mickey Mouse, no one working in Disney animation today should *EVER* be allowed to be messing around with or perverting Disney's classic animation style when it's not theirs to mess with. A large part of why I've greatly detested some of the most recent animated appearances of these classic Disney characters is for how much they've taken away from and diminished the artistic quality they already had when they should have otherwise been left alone, and the Disney we have today should be above ever letting that happen in the first place.
"Phoey" didn't appear in the old show
In the corner is the logo of the Donald Duck Comics, not the DuckTales Logo.
The drawing style has simply become severely substandard.
less detail, flatter, simpler.
It will be too expensive to draw in the old style?
The larger problem as I've seen it is that Disney's artistic standards for 2D animation had simply gone to rot, especially with the abandonment of their 2D feature animation in favor of pushing CGI. Growing up on Disney animation in the 90s I know for myself that their standards used to be much higher for what they wanted put into their 2D animated cartoons even within the smaller television market. Even Disneytoon Studios put out animated work more superior to the type of cartoons Disney Television Animation have been putting out for the last decade, but it was John Lasseter who had the studio shut down based on his own bias that he didn't like their direct-to-video projects.
Point is I don't feel that a lot of what's been done with these classic Disney characters and properties like Mickey & Friends under the current regime would have ever gotten by as easily with the Disney I knew. Their characters had to be portrayed consistently across all their official media, drawn and animated up to a specific standard in their own specific animation style, while wanting to maintain how we knew some of these characters in the times of Walt Disney himself. The modern Disney management of Bob Iger has had much less real standards for that sort of thing anymore from what I've noticed. They just let any of those rules be thrown out the window and ignored, when those rules were always arguably for the best for their classic characters and their 2D animation.
Both of them awesome but i like New one more
This is whats wrong with the world people don't know how to leave well enough alone, studio's just don't get enough of remaking things from the past that was perfect and then screwing them up
And I'm glad someone can have the sense to apply this to DuckTales as well. The Disney Afternoon shows were still some of the highest standard of TV animation Disney had ever put out IMO, and all this reboot really achieved with their crammed-in nostalgic exploitation of these shows is making them all look worse when otherwise this reboot could have never existed at all and these shows could still be remembered fondly on their own, including DuckTales.
Sadly some people just want to care more about seeing these older cartoons again in general, in any capacity, than about whatever quality went into these cartoons originally from an animation standpoint and what kind we should still be wanting to see going into them today.
@@nicksorenson940 Exactly
I prefer the old ones, they look more appealing. The new ones look too stiff and they have too many edges to them, if anyone tried to hug them they'd get hurt. Sonic has less edges to him and he's a hedgehog, he just has edges at his back.
I think it's just the art style tbh, but I respect ur opinion
@@caitlincabzz0918 Just the artstyle? You almost make it sound as if it doesn't matter. Would you still watch the show if the designs were done by Rob Liefeld?
And for the record, it's not just the artstyle I dislike. I also dislike the voices of Huey, Louie and Dewey, they sound too adult and not childish enough. I also don't like how they made Launchpad and Flintheart dumber than what feels necessary.
Both are good. But idk what tf was going on in 87 when there were designing Glomgold.
I do have to admit to liking the new ones better for the most part.
The females all look way less generic girly - I like that
Wonder why they didn't color their eyes blue lol
Donald duck is ducktales but mickey mouse caraccter
The 2017 is so good. When I saw Mrs Beakly I lost it. And the the whole Spy Thriller plot was just fantastic.
Phoey didnt apear in the new versino
You can see him for a short time in ”A Nightmare on Killmotor Hill“
Wow
You missed out Lena and Funso.
Who’s gonna tell them?
Someone has to tell him eventually
Y’all I don’t think anyone’s gonna tell em
I maybe crazy, but I don't think anyone's gonna tell Them.
if none of y’all are telling them i’m telling them
Those old people calling the original better because they just can't get used to new stuff lmfao
Hey, look! It's your mommy calling you for drink your soymilk before you go to bed, kid.
@@JadenYukiSliferVermelho Ohhh,i made you sad peepaw? I'm so sorry, now, let's get you back to your bed
@@JadenYukiSliferVermelho but he is obviously right to be A current product is going to have much higher quality than the old school but of course that does not mean that one is better but in this case it is difficult
@@Manqueo_Dubs "A current product is going to have much higher quality than the old school"
Tom and Jerry being inserted and looking wonky in Wonka's chocolate factory, the later cartoons with Woody Woodpecker looking really cheap and Woody looking unappealing in CGI form in the feature films, Yogi Bear and the Ninja Turtles also looking unappealing in CGI, newer seasons of Family Guy and The Simpsons being bland and forgettable, Velma being rather unlikable as the main character in her show, ReBoot: The Guardian Code having weak plots and characters, Metroid: Other M doing a disfavour to the character of Samus Aran with its story, The Lord of the Rings: Gollum and Skull Island: Rise of Kong being filled with bugs...
Not saying newer products can't be good (e.g. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem, Metroid Dread and the newer Sonic games all got great reception), but thinking that newer products is automatically going to have higher quality is, well, not smart.
@@Tommy_Grenlund Here we were talking about the largest company in the world of animation and it was mainly talking about Reboot of duck adventures that does have better animation but to be kind I put it at his level wmyig Besides, it is not difficult to deny that the new animation is abysmally superior to the old one Or are you going to say that into the Spider Verse and across the Spiderverse along with the Ninja Turtles movie are not the products with the best animation in recent years? Modern animation is abysmally superior and to begin with I was talking about the animation of this enormous company and how it did a good reboot of its old version, destroying it in animation and the intro is t Totally better
The old ones are better.
Me gustan más los del reboot
Phoey is real??
He was a gag in an episode
Mma is hotter in Dt17
Fr🤣🤣🤣
New one cuz the og mostly just the same design with some small differences
Almost all of the ducks have the same looking face
The original DuckTales was more better
What if Mickey Minnie Pluto Pete appeared in Season 4
They cancelled ss3 thats why its the the last adventure is the series finale
Still hoping for more reboot series :)
The new ones are a lot better in my opinion they give of more emotions and you can tell what kind of person they are judging from how they look while 1987 takes a more cutesy style ware the boys don’t look that much different while in 2017 they have certain differences
If you're going to criticize the 1987 series for looking "too cutesy" then you just don't see the charm and appeal of Disney's true style of animation, which some of the more modern stuff like this and Paul Rudish's Mickey Mouse have sucked away and tarnished.
@@nicksorenson940 did I say something wrong it doesn’t look like I did
How about lena
Lena is a completely new character
i think ducktales 2017 designe is very bad !!!!,i would prefer in 2017 series kept the original character designe !!!
으. 그린 건 고생했겠지만 질이 낮네.
No comparison. 87 by a landslide
Yeah, their clothes look better
@@Master-Worksthat’s because they were made to look like they were in 1987, just like the 2017 version.
@@mightythearmiddilo 1987 clothes looked better
@@Master-Works are you from that era?
@@mightythearmiddilo In a way
Old one way better. The new design looks ugly. What's with the square heads
Boo
@@kaizokuoninarounekoda Boo yourself.
Better designs: 1987
Better show: 2017
An invalid statement when nothing about the reboot even matters. Disney's established cartoons aren't meant to be "rebooted".
the new is just awful awful awful
Looks like someone is in nostalgia land and can’t find their way out.
@@snakeeyes2551 So says the fake DuckTales fan.
@@nicksorenson940 I’ve watched 1987 and 2017 version of DuckTales and enjoyed both of them. I’m just not one of those people that’s blinded by nostalgia.
New is bettter