Can you beat the latest Stockfish 16.0? *ChatGPT* I don't directly play games like chess, but I can certainly help you analyze games or improve your chess strategy by discussing principles, tactics, and various scenarios. As for playing against advanced chess engines like Stockfish 16, which is one of the strongest chess engines in the world, the capabilities needed to potentially beat such an engine involve high-level strategic understanding, as well as immense computational power and advanced algorithms specific to chess. These engines are designed to evaluate millions of positions per second and use highly sophisticated algorithms to determine the best moves based on extensive databases of opening theory and endgame tablebases. Their strength lies in their ability to perform deep calculations and error-free play, which is a significant challenge for any human player and most AI not specifically optimized for chess. So, while I can provide support in learning and analyzing chess, playing directly against something as powerful as Stockfish 16 would be outside the scope of my capabilities! If you're interested in improving your chess skills or understanding specific aspects of the game better, feel free to ask!
Chat gpt is humble he don't want to hurt stockfish feelings.if you ask him if he could beat Magnus he will say the same.but if he played with him he will show his powerful strategy to play deferent opening with rare variations that player will not often analyze or play .
@@jeanmichel9207 Yes, ChatGPT is very humble, agree. However, I have played ChatGPT 3.5 at chess and wasn't good at all. I even had to correct illegal moves. It would reply, sorry for my mistake. Granted, I have not tried version 4.0 but since its focus is on general things and not specific things I believe it.
stockfish is an open source code thats why it is so hard to defeat because all most talented programmer join the development of the stockfish engine .....
Ninguno de los dos es ChatGPT, ChatGPT no puede jugar una partida de ajedrez de esta manera ni mucho menos de tantos movimientos, si de verdad jugó ChatGPT debió tener mucha ayuda externa de por medio. El verdadero título debería ser Stockfish vs Stockfish.
I’d take the pawn first, return to H8, then migrate to F8 and then E8 and then chop the rook.. Because I’m a bit weak, I’d hunt the bishop and then go for mate, but that is boring.
🤦 This is Stockfish vs. Stockfish, no ChatGPT involved, there were some interesting moments but showing all the moves is completely unnecessary, plus you incerted your own move for black at end so that white wins. It was equal for the entire game, then in a completely drawn endgame black blunders a rook??? Ive never seen worse clickbait in my entire life
No, white wins, but they don't show the last moves. If king moves, queen takes rook, and if bishop come back to protect, queen takes pawn, check, and it's over
@@captainploum3376could you explain further? Bishop comes back to protect king, queen takes pawn and check, but bishop again protects (g6). Right? And then there are different options, the end is not obvious to me
@@logic7878 In fact, don't need to take the pawn. Queen f8 check, King g6 (only move), queen e8 check, and you will take the rook. After, it's mate in about 10 moves according to Stockfish
Не говори глупости . Каким образом программа вынудила черных не делать ничью , если на доске ничья ? Где ты увидел победу ? Ничья была , ничья и осталась .
@@user-kw4vm9pq3q Si te fijás, con la última jugada ganan las blancas. Pero es algo artificial porque el negro hace una mala jugada a propósito que les permite a las blancas ganar. Si no, es un empate técnico. Saludos!
i don t think so . black were forced to move bishop . If not they were mate . But in moving the bishop , they expose the rook , and the white can take the rook or the pawn
I asked ChatGPT 4.0 if it could beat the latest Stockfish, it said no.
Can you beat the latest Stockfish 16.0?
*ChatGPT*
I don't directly play games like chess, but I can certainly help you analyze games or improve your chess strategy by discussing principles, tactics, and various scenarios. As for playing against advanced chess engines like Stockfish 16, which is one of the strongest chess engines in the world, the capabilities needed to potentially beat such an engine involve high-level strategic understanding, as well as immense computational power and advanced algorithms specific to chess.
These engines are designed to evaluate millions of positions per second and use highly sophisticated algorithms to determine the best moves based on extensive databases of opening theory and endgame tablebases. Their strength lies in their ability to perform deep calculations and error-free play, which is a significant challenge for any human player and most AI not specifically optimized for chess.
So, while I can provide support in learning and analyzing chess, playing directly against something as powerful as Stockfish 16 would be outside the scope of my capabilities! If you're interested in improving your chess skills or understanding specific aspects of the game better, feel free to ask!
Chat gpt is humble he don't want to hurt stockfish feelings.if you ask him if he could beat Magnus he will say the same.but if he played with him he will show his powerful strategy to play deferent opening with rare variations that player will not often analyze or play .
@@jeanmichel9207 Yes, ChatGPT is very humble, agree. However, I have played ChatGPT 3.5 at chess and wasn't good at all. I even had to correct illegal moves. It would reply, sorry for my mistake. Granted, I have not tried version 4.0 but since its focus is on general things and not specific things I believe it.
stockfish is an open source code thats why it is so hard to defeat because all most talented programmer join the development of the stockfish engine .....
who is who?
Chat GPT and StockFish
Who is black who is white bro@@GitarukuIT
Stockfish (white) vs. ChatGPT (black)
The 1st is the white in chess ,, see the title
Se ocuparon de poner música y lo importante lo olvidaron. Vaya.
Ninguno de los dos es ChatGPT, ChatGPT no puede jugar una partida de ajedrez de esta manera ni mucho menos de tantos movimientos, si de verdad jugó ChatGPT debió tener mucha ayuda externa de por medio.
El verdadero título debería ser Stockfish vs Stockfish.
Amazing how black mucked it up and lost in the end.
Stockfish was relentless and lucky.
I’d take the pawn first, return to H8, then migrate to F8 and then E8 and then chop the rook..
Because I’m a bit weak, I’d hunt the bishop and then go for mate, but that is boring.
Empataron, ahí no hay ni un jacke menos mate.
chat gpt is stockfisch 16? now stockfish 16.1 exists
Bro called an engine lucky, aint no way
At first, I thought it was draw. Then I realized after Bh7,.Que check Kg6 then Qe8 check and wins the rook. So 1-0
ChatGPT is just a Generative AI, so it doesn't play chess!
it does ... badly
@@victorfinberg8595no he pretends to play chess. He doesn't even see the board.
B-O-R-I-N-G!!!!
I think that if Black is ChatGPT (according to and basing on the title), then he's kidding us or is ELO is inflated (the real one would be about 1000)
what a bizarre game. there are some blunders here that even small children would not make
lol
Morphy would destroy both of them together
Who's playing white ?
I suspect SF since it's listed first.
Esa ultima jugada del negro fue para terminar por aburrimiento
chatgpt based on record on database....
What a boring and lagging video... Soo lagging with that worst background music
It's not a check mate yet. Black can still protect its king
. . . . Rh7
Qxh7 Kxh7
Kxh5 Kg7
Black still has one pawn left
What are you talking about ? Bh7 ??? QxF6
Who is gpt
Stockfish se dejó.
Noiosissima
there’s no way its stockfish vs gpt😅😅😅😅
¡¡ Stockfischer !!
❤❤
2:53 ,es TORRE C 2!! o Tb1
Была крепость и ничья, но черные сами её разрушили
WOW
Bucle ad infinitum
Ходы слабые, много упущенных возможностей. Это наверное stockfish 8 vs gptchat 3.5
🤦 This is Stockfish vs. Stockfish, no ChatGPT involved, there were some interesting moments but showing all the moves is completely unnecessary, plus you incerted your own move for black at end so that white wins. It was equal for the entire game, then in a completely drawn endgame black blunders a rook??? Ive never seen worse clickbait in my entire life
Why do you dy white wons the game? There is no mat in the end, no?
@@captainploum3376 Stockfish with black pieces resigned because the position is an easy win for white
Игра в поддавки
Reating online
Was it a draw?
No, white wins, but they don't show the last moves. If king moves, queen takes rook, and if bishop come back to protect, queen takes pawn, check, and it's over
@@captainploum3376could you explain further? Bishop comes back to protect king, queen takes pawn and check, but bishop again protects (g6). Right? And then there are different options, the end is not obvious to me
@@logic7878 In fact, don't need to take the pawn. Queen f8 check, King g6 (only move), queen e8 check, and you will take the rook. After, it's mate in about 10 moves according to Stockfish
No human grand master could have lost that 2nd from last black pawn!!! Nonsense engine play!!
Gpt play chess???
Thats a draw but Black was forced by program not to be a draw. Because it must be an eternal check at the end.
Не говори глупости . Каким образом программа вынудила черных не делать ничью , если на доске ничья ? Где ты увидел победу ? Ничья была , ничья и осталась .
@@user-kw4vm9pq3q
Si te fijás, con la última jugada ganan las blancas. Pero es algo artificial porque el negro hace una mala jugada a propósito que les permite a las blancas ganar. Si no, es un empate técnico.
Saludos!
i don t think so . black were forced to move bishop . If not they were mate . But in moving the bishop , they expose the rook , and the white can take the rook or the pawn
Stokfish doesn't play chess. He offers random moves
unbelievable! it was idiotic move. to miss mate in one move. even I could see it...
if stockfish a closed source program?, i think the number 1 today will be the komodo or shredder chess...
Stockfish #1, Lc0 #2.
Stockfish - Roma ( 8 years - champion of word ) - 1. Nf3 e6 2. e4 b6 3. Bc4 Bb7 4. d3 f6 5. O-O Ne7 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. d4 d5
8. ed5 ed5 9. Bb5 Qd7 10. Re1 O-O-O 11. Qd3 g5 12. Bd2 h5 13. a3 h4 14. Be3 g4 15. Nd2 Bh6 16. Bh6 Rh6 17. b4 f5 18. Ba6
Rf8 19. Nb3 f4 20. Qb5 Ba6 21. Qa6 Kb8 22. b5 Nd8 23. Nc5 Qd6 24. Nd3 g3 25. Re5 gh2 26. Kh2 f3! 27. gf3 Rf3 28. Kg2 Rd3
29. cd3 h3 30. Kf3 Ne6 31. Ke3 Nd4 32. f4 Nc2 33. Ke2 Na1 34. Nd1 h2 35. Nf2 Qc5 36. Rg5 Qc2 37. Kf1 h1Q 38. Rg1 Rh2
0-1
Champion of word - huuuuhhhaaaa
@@loulucat7870 среди 8-ми летних ( соревнования были в Египте )
Who wins?
draw by boredom
White after blunder from black...not expected . 37:01
white wins, but they didn't show the last moves, don't know why... stupid video
draw
@@how-to-video it's not draw, if king moves, queen takes rook, and if bishop comes back to protect, queen take pawn, check...
Eso son tablas, empate
. .si ça c'est des joueurs d'échec, et bien moi, je suis le roi d'Angleterre. 😅
Horrível 😂
Hay jugadas que son claros errores.
Jajajajaja ¿enserio? ¿Cuál es tu posición Elo para empezar?
Clickbait trash
Amazing that black lost this game. Manus could have won it with Black
@@noname-FJB Stockfish demolishes Magnus 100 out of 100 games, what are you talking about?
This is a fake absolute
Its draw?
No
No
White wins
no . . if king g6 , queen takes the rook h5 . if bishop goes to h7 , queen takes pawn g6 , checkmate
Boring
Simplemente bullshitnet...
who play white and who black !