So glad somebody finally pointing out that the color science has a bias even in raw. I did my own test with my Sony where I used the same artificial light with the only difference being white balance. Not only were the raw images different, but when I tried to “correct” the WB in post the images still looked different. The way you instruct the camera to interpret the colors in the scene (via settings) influences the color information baked into the file. It would take heavy edits to get it where you want it to be which makes a good color science that much more important.
Absolutely. Some ppl like to say color science doesn't matter with raw or log footage but it absolutely does. Of course being skilled at coloring helps a lot but 1. you want to go with cameras that make your job faster and easier, and 2. not everyone is skilled and that's ok.
If I want to get the Nikon 28-400mm, is it too big for everyday use on a Zf? Do people use the dedicated shutter and ISO dials on the Zf or just get it for the look and end up just use the front and rear dials more which means the Z6III will make more sense with the better grip and even better EVF even let say you just want to use a small lens on it? Also what camera and lenses you carry or you just use phone while travel and everyday hangout and situations? Does using a Z6 with shutter speed and ISO on the front and back dials plus aperture ring on lens provide similar or better or worse experience than these dedicated dials on top of Zf without the need to get Zf for the look hence Sony A7R V which has a prism VF and flat top design hich looks just like a Zf but modern look with bigger grip? I shoot for fun, art, contest and gig if possible tho I haven't done yet, my plan is to get that lens with Zf ith the 28-400mm and a Sony Xperia 1 VI phone (26,24,48,85-170, 2X macro) to be always with me waterproof and macro camera, down the line I might get the 14-30 and Voigtländer 50mm F1 if I want to maximize what I can get from wider shots and also when I need boleh which is rare time but that manual lens and aesthetic of the lens is nice! And I love Yellow colour, hope Nikon will make a Yellow colour Zf like they did with the new colour entries on the Zf! 💛
Only you can say if the ZF combo is too big for you and only can know if you would rather have the ZF and the z63. Best thing you should do is go to a camera store and hold them in your hands and decide for yourself.
My ZF is fantastic moreover I found the lenses that are enjoyable and produce awesome results such as Nikon z 135 mm 1.8 Plena, Voigtlander 58mm 1.4, Nikon z 26mm 2.8 and Voigtlander 40mm 1.2
You're clueless,, the Z system easily has the most mountable lenses in any system... Aside from the native Nikon Z glass and the older F mounts (including Sigma and Tamron) , you can also mount Sony E mount and ZEISS lenses.. Via adapters of course, fully functional.. Plus there is the lower tier brands lime TTArtisan, Viltrox and Meike...so if you have to count every lenses that you can mount on a Z system.. NIKON is the clear runaway WINNER
Terrible end to this story...lol..
I know, right? I'll explain more in my next video. Thanks so much for stopping by, I'm a big fan of your channel!
At this point I believe Nikon Zf is Nikon's trap to Fuji and Leica user to get into the Z system and buys the more expensive Z8 or Z9. Brilliant move!
@@ufukkiblat that tracks
So glad somebody finally pointing out that the color science has a bias even in raw. I did my own test with my Sony where I used the same artificial light with the only difference being white balance. Not only were the raw images different, but when I tried to “correct” the WB in post the images still looked different. The way you instruct the camera to interpret the colors in the scene (via settings) influences the color information baked into the file. It would take heavy edits to get it where you want it to be which makes a good color science that much more important.
Absolutely. Some ppl like to say color science doesn't matter with raw or log footage but it absolutely does. Of course being skilled at coloring helps a lot but 1. you want to go with cameras that make your job faster and easier, and 2. not everyone is skilled and that's ok.
totally agree, love my blue Zf 😍
bro...how did you get a blue one!
@@stkuj ordered it from the Nikon store, here in the Netherlands
@@obedbrinkman I really wanted the grey one but wasn't patient enough
If I want to get the Nikon 28-400mm, is it too big for everyday use on a Zf? Do people use the dedicated shutter and ISO dials on the Zf or just get it for the look and end up just use the front and rear dials more which means the Z6III will make more sense with the better grip and even better EVF even let say you just want to use a small lens on it? Also what camera and lenses you carry or you just use phone while travel and everyday hangout and situations? Does using a Z6 with shutter speed and ISO on the front and back dials plus aperture ring on lens provide similar or better or worse experience than these dedicated dials on top of Zf without the need to get Zf for the look hence Sony A7R V which has a prism VF and flat top design hich looks just like a Zf but modern look with bigger grip?
I shoot for fun, art, contest and gig if possible tho I haven't done yet, my plan is to get that lens with Zf ith the 28-400mm and a Sony Xperia 1 VI phone (26,24,48,85-170, 2X macro) to be always with me waterproof and macro camera, down the line I might get the 14-30 and Voigtländer 50mm F1 if I want to maximize what I can get from wider shots and also when I need boleh which is rare time but that manual lens and aesthetic of the lens is nice! And I love Yellow colour, hope Nikon will make a Yellow colour Zf like they did with the new colour entries on the Zf! 💛
Only you can say if the ZF combo is too big for you and only can know if you would rather have the ZF and the z63. Best thing you should do is go to a camera store and hold them in your hands and decide for yourself.
A amazing presentation, and very thing is very well covered,ZF is a an amazing camera.
Thanks for watching!
amazing presentation, everything is well covered,ZF is a an amazing camera.
I want this camera to replace my old D7500. Approx. How many shots does the battery last?
I would say 400ish. Not the best battery life, but you can charge it with a usb c cable
Leica owners are people who like overpaying for a Sony sensor in a shitty camera
I really hope Nikon makes a fixed lens vintage style rangefinder camera. A poor man’s Leica!
Either that or an interchangeable rangerfinder style body would be welcome too
Easily the worst camera of all times! Why release a camera without any lenses for it? Still enough people that fall for it...
I remember when people were saying that about Sony, and yet here we are
My ZF is fantastic moreover I found the lenses that are enjoyable and produce awesome results such as Nikon z 135 mm 1.8 Plena, Voigtlander 58mm 1.4, Nikon z 26mm 2.8 and Voigtlander 40mm 1.2
People saying this most likely never use aperture ring and leave it on A or wide open all the time.
also, worst camera because of lenses? 🤣🤣
You're clueless,, the Z system easily has the most mountable lenses in any system... Aside from the native Nikon Z glass and the older F mounts (including Sigma and Tamron) , you can also mount Sony E mount and ZEISS lenses.. Via adapters of course, fully functional.. Plus there is the lower tier brands lime TTArtisan, Viltrox and Meike...so if you have to count every lenses that you can mount on a Z system.. NIKON is the clear runaway WINNER