@@Coolpachito note during flare how his hand acts like a limiter of the sidestick, while letting the other free movement but not allowing him any major aggressive move
It's this disturbing trend among light jets nowadays to omit thrust reversers to save weight. I think T/R should always be standard equipment for jets. Nothing like not having to touch the brakes after touchdown on a wet, icy and slippery runway thanks to effective reversers.
@@macdaddyp8437 Well, maybe but there's always the possibility of an emergency. As for the 10%, I'm certain that doesn't factor in aerodynamic braking.
Garmin avionics are more precise than anything rambling around in your head. Without that glass panel few people would survive IMC like this.... but then, we all get you are not a pilot.
That’s what makes this aircraft So freakin amazing. It even is equipped with the emergency self landing system and can basically do that by itself all the way to breaking after touchdown. Not to mention a ballistic parachute crash system three times its size. And it’s just a sexy aircraft. Anyone with 3 million laying around and half a brain would get their license and buy one of these.
@@terrythekittieful I can't compare it to car, because it's really different things. But interior well organized, and avionics looks like very natural to those cockpit, because its modern aircraft, u would not see the effect when u seeing a modern avionics as a part of old, more analogue based instruments in old aircraft. And those double displays and joystick systems makes me feel like its small airbus cockpit, so its very and very serious for me.
You may wanna put some specs in the description for those who are interested such as: camera model, microphone, plane model, route taken, day filmed, etc. Makes it seem more professional I think. But good work 👍
Grew up in the late 60’s flying planes and later flew EFIS then Flat Panel as in today. But “Like the Beatles song” am happy watching things continually getting better all the time.
Excellent video! In wind shear, you have to have increased air speed, but it seems like it was still too high on short final. What would be the recommend speed crossing the threshold in such difficult conditions (since the runway didn't seem very long and you had far less than ideal breaking conditions)? I had to land a Piper Saratoga II in Raleigh some years back when a strong winter cold front just passed through. They were calling out wind shear alerts and pilots were reporting either extra tailwinds or headwinds of 10 or more knots, so I kept a good amount of extra speed, not knowing what I would encounter, but it ended up being one of my best landings (since I had to concentrate so much). The line guy said, "We were all watching you, and that was a great landing!"
G-IV pilot was telling his passengers he couldn't go because of weather. Just then a Cirrus taxis by the window. Passenger says, "That guy made it here. " Pilot says, "He's got a better cockpit than I do."
Yes I landed long but after ice accumulation it is recommended to land with 50% flaps and VREF+10. That’s 115 KIAS rather than 85-90, so longer landing distance.
Finally a new SF50 video! Been looking all over RUclips for new videos. I just started studying the plane, deliver should be around June... Bumpy approach! One question, why did you turned off all anti ice with 0 degrees and rain? EDIT: Never mind, the engine ice protection switch was on all the way, my bad
Genuine question from a non-pilot, feel free to ask me a 'Stupid' question concerning my field of expertise. So, here goes: These touch-screens/ digital displays make me nervous as I can't see any analogue instruments, which I had assumed would be there as a fail-safe? Horizon etc. Merci d'avance, and stay safe. Best wishes from an Englishman in a French forest. 👍🌞
Salut ! So, AFAIK there usually is backup instruments in a full glass cockpit in the form of either analog instruments or a small LCD screen with a backup PFD (you can see it if you search for exemple what a 777 cockpit looks like, it's usually a smalled LCD screen, to the right of where the pilot's main displays are), but I don't see any in the SF50 cockpit ! So I search a bit on the internet, and found this on Garmin's Website : "The avionics suite includes dual oversized widescreen flight displays with multi-pane capabilities and offers the following standard or optional features:[...], integrated backup instrument display and more." So I would assume that in case of an electrical failure, at least one of the displays is able to run on a battery and display some limited instruments. Now, if you have a display failure, what happen ? :P Best wishes from a Frenchman :)
Absolutely awesome, I love this aircraft. Thank you so much for sharing. If you don't mind me asking, was that a landing done by auto pilot? I noticed the pilot rarely had his hand on the stick. Unless if the person with the camara had the aircraft. I'm not a pilot, I didn't know if that kind of technology exhisted or not.
Great question. The pilot in the left seat (with the head mounted camera) was flying. That said, autopilot was indeed used on this approach down to about minimums, then the final bit through touchdown was all hand flown. Thanks for watching!
@HAKAN RÜZGAR To use auto land systems it requires a category III ILS system which is typically only found at major international airports, and the aircraft and flight crew have to be certified for category III ILS systems, which is typically only airliners and similar large aircraft and their flight crews. A normal ILS is a category I and at most airports (terrain permitting) can provide guidance down to 200ft above ground level after which autopilot must be disconnected and hand flown through the landing.
@@jg4403 thanks for the answer. So why had the Co-Pilot his hand so close to the stick. Didn't he trust the PIC? ;-) Or was the PIC a student, and the Co the Flightinstructor?
@@dkdanis1340 Yeah I'm aware about the emergency autoland system and its capabilities to operate off of ILS, RNAV, or even a runway without an approach at all. This video though and my original comment you replied to were not talking about the emergency auto land. My reply was responding to a different person who appears to have deleted his original comment where I was explaining the conventional cat iii autoland found on airliners which is still the only normally approved autoland system in service. If I remember correctly the comment I replied to was thinking this landing was done by the traditional auto land system needing cat iii certification, which this one is not. Which you can tell its not the emergency autoland system in this case since the displays are working normally (the emergency system takes over the displays and everything) and that is only approved to be used in an actual emergency.
I did not realize that GPS's were that accurate with respect to the painted lines on the runway being in sync with the graphical display. Or, was that just coincidence?
@Atlantis Most GNSS/GPS receivers are about .5 meter in accuracy. I was not sure if this plane is using the newer RTK GPS interface providing them accuracy down to 10 mm
@@jimmyjim2418 Okay so in cause of electrical shutdown your only hope IN PLANE is to open parachute cuz you cant control its WINGS do i understand it correctly?
They don't, but all the sensors are redundant and the same goes for the screens, unless you lose all of them, you'll get the speed/altitude/attitude somewhere. And if you somehow lost everything (EMP, maybe), there's still the emergency parachute to get you down more or less intact.
Here's a stupid question, do these have reverse thrusters of some kind or are you landing purely on brakes? Drag chute? lolololol Seems like you'd be coming down pretty fast in something like this when you touched down.
not stupid at all. Would make sense if the plane took forever to slow if you didn't know about some small details. He mentions flaps at 50 percent; while theyre down, they effectively slow airspeed. In addition there are very durable brakes on the new cirrus jets, so they can land correctly (and quickly!) with appropriate weather conditions
@@jimpenney5508 This jet lands normally almost like a Cirrus prop plane, or a Cessna. Doesn't have reversers or speed brakes. Standard braking is fine. Apparently due to icing conditions, this time he landed long and at a slightly higher VREF touchdown speed, to compensate for drag that icing may contribute to the landing.
غفرانك يا غافر الذنب اللهم اني تبت اليك فغفر لي ذنوبي و جرئتي على ما حرمت و اشفيني و ارحمني و استرني و اجعل لي في الدنيا حسنه و في الاخرة حسنه و قنا عذاب النار
That’s not an ILS but a RNP approach with Lnav/vnav guidance I believe... ILS glideslope and Loc are depicted in green on G1000 system instead of the Gps magenta here 😉
Yes, this airplane isn't the prettiest thing that has ever been built, but it also costs "little". A cool plane like an F-35 (bad comparison, I know) easily costs 30 times as much....
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
these cockpits are starting to look more and more like cars, love the minimalist functionality
Probably because the jets so simple of a flying machine
@2:51 I LOVE that display!
"Oh you landed? Here is the airport to help you taxi"
This cockpit is absolutely BEAUTIFUL! I wonder what's now automated/computer-controlled versus a standard software or analog toggle.
In that wether condition, what a beautiful landing, congratulations.
Incredible! This jet is one of the most gorgeous recent planes and your landing was smooooooth
Cheers
Very good on putting that finger as a limiter. Thats a non intrusive way to guard controls while letting the "student" land safely.
Thanks!
What finger?
@@Coolpachito note during flare how his hand acts like a limiter of the sidestick, while letting the other free movement but not allowing him any major aggressive move
@@MarcFootageAviation so thats what he was doing , wondered why was his hand twitching all along
These planes are amazing. AP made that approach a breeze.
Real pilots land without it and don't use
@@Jokertuning So, may we assume that you are a "real pilot"?
@@Jokertuning ok buddy
@@Jokertuning lol
I think the left seat was controlling the aircraft and right seat had his hands ready just in case.
Wonderful job! Great technology
Fantastic video
Continue to impress. Nice job handling the tough conditions
Haha love the ford air vents! 😅
Amazing aircraft 🙌🏻
Those screens are amazing.
“How much runway do you need?”
“All of it.” 😳
How much quilometers have this runway?
It's this disturbing trend among light jets nowadays to omit thrust reversers to save weight. I think T/R should always be standard equipment for jets. Nothing like not having to touch the brakes after touchdown on a wet, icy and slippery runway thanks to effective reversers.
"I pay whole runway" "I use whole runway"
@@macdaddyp8437 Well, maybe but there's always the possibility of an emergency. As for the 10%, I'm certain that doesn't factor in aerodynamic braking.
Fly through the rectangles. This is almost as realistic as Flight Simulator.
Don't forget the Orion III waltzing with Space Station 5
Garmin avionics are more precise than anything rambling around in your head. Without that glass panel few people would survive IMC like this.... but then, we all get you are not a pilot.
I didn't hear the ding noise every time he went through one and couldn't see the score increasing anywhere on the screen.
@Jay Smith for the same reason you need truck drivers and train engineers.. Eventualities.
That’s what makes this aircraft
So freakin amazing. It even is equipped with the emergency self landing system and can basically do that by itself all the way to breaking after touchdown. Not to mention a ballistic parachute crash system three times its size. And it’s just a sexy aircraft. Anyone with 3 million laying around and half a brain would get their license and buy one of these.
Beautiful cockpit
It is, like a car in the sky,..BMW ?
@@terrythekittieful I can't compare it to car, because it's really different things. But interior well organized, and avionics looks like very natural to those cockpit, because its modern aircraft, u would not see the effect when u seeing a modern avionics as a part of old, more analogue based instruments in old aircraft. And those double displays and joystick systems makes me feel like its small airbus cockpit, so its very and very serious for me.
Yeah those aircond vents scream car lol
What a calm one! Great job!
This is the aviation equivalent to a Tesla. What a beautiful airplane!
wait are you fr?
@@IIOctaneII no I'm fake
@@Skidmark_aviation 😐
Lovely video! Thank you for sharing. 🛩
Good job! That plane makes it look easy.
Beautiful cockpit. Great video
Nice landing
Thanks!
Perfect landing
Flying has this Magic...
Incredible!
It's always cool to see competent people ply their trade.
These new glass panels are just fantastic!
Really nice landing professional work
You may wanna put some specs in the description for those who are interested such as: camera model, microphone, plane model, route taken, day filmed, etc. Makes it seem more professional I think. But good work 👍
Thanks for the idea!
Size of shoes, calories eaten, distance to the closer walmart, zodiac sign...
@@KrauserKahn lol
@@jg4403 You say that but the description is still empty
@@KrauserKahn Airport?
You have to love that APR button............
Grew up in the late 60’s flying planes and later flew EFIS then Flat Panel as in today. But “Like the Beatles song” am happy watching things continually getting better all the time.
Thanks so much, really appreciate the support!
Excellent video! In wind shear, you have to have increased air speed, but it seems like it was still too high on short final. What would be the recommend speed crossing the threshold in such difficult conditions (since the runway didn't seem very long and you had far less than ideal breaking conditions)? I had to land a Piper Saratoga II in Raleigh some years back when a strong winter cold front just passed through. They were calling out wind shear alerts and pilots were reporting either extra tailwinds or headwinds of 10 or more knots, so I kept a good amount of extra speed, not knowing what I would encounter, but it ended up being one of my best landings (since I had to concentrate so much). The line guy said, "We were all watching you, and that was a great landing!"
Minimums!!! Great Landing!!
Synthetic Vision is my stone cold favorite add-on.
Amazing
G-IV pilot was telling his passengers he couldn't go because of weather. Just then a Cirrus taxis by the window. Passenger says, "That guy made it here. " Pilot says, "He's got a better cockpit than I do."
Weak pilot, planes can fly in anything.
@@jimjab3631 I think there was a minimums or RVR problem that night. Better to be late to the Pearly gates than to make it to Hell on time.
Nice landing!!!
nice video; landed a bit long, but thx for sharing.
Yes I landed long but after ice accumulation it is recommended to land with 50% flaps and VREF+10. That’s 115 KIAS rather than 85-90, so longer landing distance.
@@jg4403 on this procedure runways get quick short. Be careful. Great airplane by the way.
I thought this was in order to vaccate rwy quickly to the farthest parking area
Of course you don't read and respond after armchair piloting, to which you have no idea what you are talking about.
@@jg4403 That explains my question above.
Wow! Epic landing. Butter.
Nice aproach
Finally a new SF50 video! Been looking all over RUclips for new videos. I just started studying the plane, deliver should be around June... Bumpy approach! One question, why did you turned off all anti ice with 0 degrees and rain?
EDIT: Never mind, the engine ice protection switch was on all the way, my bad
You are going to love the plane. Thanks for watching!
Did your jet arrive? I've fallen in love with them as well and wanna check getting one
@@mental720s yes it did! We ferried it to Brazil a month ago, and now the paperwork is almost done. I am going to pick it up for good next Monday.
wow look at those nice panels. Runway centerline cam!
It’s actually an artificial centerline fed by GPS data
Genuine question from a non-pilot, feel free to ask me a 'Stupid' question concerning my field of expertise.
So, here goes: These touch-screens/ digital displays make me nervous as I can't see any analogue instruments, which I had assumed would be there as a fail-safe? Horizon etc.
Merci d'avance, and stay safe.
Best wishes from an Englishman in a French forest. 👍🌞
Salut !
So, AFAIK there usually is backup instruments in a full glass cockpit in the form of either analog instruments or a small LCD screen with a backup PFD (you can see it if you search for exemple what a 777 cockpit looks like, it's usually a smalled LCD screen, to the right of where the pilot's main displays are), but I don't see any in the SF50 cockpit ! So I search a bit on the internet, and found this on Garmin's Website :
"The avionics suite includes dual oversized widescreen flight displays with multi-pane capabilities and offers the following standard or optional features:[...], integrated backup instrument display and more."
So I would assume that in case of an electrical failure, at least one of the displays is able to run on a battery and display some limited instruments. Now, if you have a display failure, what happen ? :P
Best wishes from a Frenchman :)
Excellent!! great landing
that's one good looking cockpit
What a cool job.
Absolutely awesome, I love this aircraft. Thank you so much for sharing. If you don't mind me asking, was that a landing done by auto pilot? I noticed the pilot rarely had his hand on the stick. Unless if the person with the camara had the aircraft. I'm not a pilot, I didn't know if that kind of technology exhisted or not.
Great question. The pilot in the left seat (with the head mounted camera) was flying. That said, autopilot was indeed used on this approach down to about minimums, then the final bit through touchdown was all hand flown. Thanks for watching!
@HAKAN RÜZGAR To use auto land systems it requires a category III ILS system which is typically only found at major international airports, and the aircraft and flight crew have to be certified for category III ILS systems, which is typically only airliners and similar large aircraft and their flight crews. A normal ILS is a category I and at most airports (terrain permitting) can provide guidance down to 200ft above ground level after which autopilot must be disconnected and hand flown through the landing.
@@jg4403 thanks for the answer. So why had the Co-Pilot his hand so close to the stick. Didn't he trust the PIC? ;-) Or was the PIC a student, and the Co the Flightinstructor?
@@helicrazy14 it doesn't need always ils. It can use gps approach. Emergency autoland can land in pretty much every runway.
@@dkdanis1340 Yeah I'm aware about the emergency autoland system and its capabilities to operate off of ILS, RNAV, or even a runway without an approach at all. This video though and my original comment you replied to were not talking about the emergency auto land. My reply was responding to a different person who appears to have deleted his original comment where I was explaining the conventional cat iii autoland found on airliners which is still the only normally approved autoland system in service. If I remember correctly the comment I replied to was thinking this landing was done by the traditional auto land system needing cat iii certification, which this one is not. Which you can tell its not the emergency autoland system in this case since the displays are working normally (the emergency system takes over the displays and everything) and that is only approved to be used in an actual emergency.
That is such a sexy cockpit!
Is it me or was it a little faster and longer landing that resulted in over breaking and short lock up of wheels.
Excelente vista
Gracias por el video.
greased that landing, nice
Good job
good job there
Nice
That was great
Does the SF50 have reverse thrust?
Классная посадка!
Amazing that autopilot!!
good job!
I did not realize that GPS's were that accurate with respect to the painted lines on the runway being in sync with the graphical display. Or, was that just coincidence?
@Atlantis Most GNSS/GPS receivers are about .5 meter in accuracy. I was not sure if this plane is using the newer RTK GPS interface providing them accuracy down to 10 mm
can we fully trust the left side landing guidance?
I just learned how to land a plane - Neo.
Nice!
Nice simulator.
seriously looks like flying your home entertainment system
nice video game
Pilot adjusts air vent on approach.... I can do that! The rest of it is a bit of a mystery though .Very cool aircraft, respect to the pilots.
What happens if the electronics fail?
Can you fly this plane solo or is a co-pilot required?
You can fly single pilot.
this thing has no analog gauges at all?
Yep!
@@jg4403 So when electrical failure occure, youre dead basically
This plane has built-in Parachute. A big one. In case of engine failure, it can parachute safely.
@@jimmyjim2418 Okay so in cause of electrical shutdown your only hope IN PLANE is to open parachute cuz you cant control its WINGS do i understand it correctly?
Is this an add-on for Flight Simulator????
Do these planes have an analog artificial horizon in case the electronics fail? Never seen one.
They don't, but all the sensors are redundant and the same goes for the screens, unless you lose all of them, you'll get the speed/altitude/attitude somewhere.
And if you somehow lost everything (EMP, maybe), there's still the emergency parachute to get you down more or less intact.
with real sound even
How do you slow down? No reverser. Just manually brake it?
Yep!
I love this small family jet. Sleek interior. Easy to operate. Like a normal daily car. Just flying it in sim though. Dreaming to own one one day
I don't understand anything. But I find it cool.
Butter
People who played "Ace Combat 5" will remember ICE CAGE, that's a great mission soundtrack...
I thought it was a video game :)))
The title of this video reminds me of “Earth Wind and Fire”
Is this MSFS?
Is the cirrus vision jet g1 or the g2
Here's a stupid question, do these have reverse thrusters of some kind or are you landing purely on brakes? Drag chute? lolololol Seems like you'd be coming down pretty fast in something like this when you touched down.
No reverses. Just brakes. Should land about 80kts
not stupid at all. Would make sense if the plane took forever to slow if you didn't know about some small details. He mentions flaps at 50 percent; while theyre down, they effectively slow airspeed. In addition there are very durable brakes on the new cirrus jets, so they can land correctly (and quickly!) with appropriate weather conditions
@@jimpenney5508 This jet lands normally almost like a Cirrus prop plane, or a Cessna. Doesn't have reversers or speed brakes. Standard braking is fine. Apparently due to icing
conditions, this time he landed long and at a slightly higher VREF touchdown speed, to compensate for drag that icing may contribute to the landing.
cool beans
Which airport is that?
Holy shnikies IFR!!!
Is no body going to talk about how it looks like a video game?
dude landed with 1 finger on the joystick :D
@@Erik3E thats the instructor, student on the left landed the aircraft.
@@h.t.fosterchen7989 well I just showed my ignorance :D
@@Erik3E But now you know, that's what counts
слишком круто!
Рогозина рук дела?
737 max cockpit should look like this.
WOW
غفرانك يا غافر الذنب اللهم اني تبت اليك فغفر لي ذنوبي و جرئتي على ما حرمت و اشفيني و ارحمني و استرني و اجعل لي في الدنيا حسنه و في الاخرة حسنه و قنا عذاب النار
All hail ILS!
That’s not an ILS but a RNP approach with Lnav/vnav guidance I believe...
ILS glideslope and Loc are depicted in green on G1000 system instead of the Gps magenta here 😉
ATC would make video really good
Cat3 dual autoland?
No I wish though!
Yes, this airplane isn't the prettiest thing that has ever been built, but it also costs "little". A cool plane like an F-35 (bad comparison, I know) easily costs 30 times as much....
I thought this stuff was fs2020 at first lol
the operating costs on this little jet about $500,000 a year. i hope the owner is making the big bucks
First Half the video i was confused whether this is real or a flight sim.....
Algo nervioso el avion, inestable me parece.
skip to @2:25
Bro i Saw you forward slip