1890-1900s Lovely New York in Color / 65 Magnificent Rare Photos Colorized

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024
  • Take a stroll back to Gorgeous New York City to the late 1890 and 1900s a metropolis full of diversity like you have never seen it before.
    If you like this video, you could support my technical work, I've spent a lot of time and effort, thank you :
    paypal.me/realvintagestories
    All Photos Restored, Enhanced, and Colorized by Bright Style.
    If you are new to this channel, welcome. Consider subscribing to continue exploring opportunities.
    Please add your questions and queries in the comments section 👍😊
    Please, be aware that colorization colors are not real and fake, colorization was made only for the ambiance and do not represent real historical data.
    #newyork #1900 #us

Комментарии • 107

  • @BrightStyle
    @BrightStyle  Год назад +14

    I want to thank you for watching and I also want to invite you to subscribe to our channel!👍😊
    If you loved this video and you would like to support my work, it really help me with my future projects, many thanks :
    paypal.me/realvintagestories

    • @raulflores362
      @raulflores362 8 месяцев назад

      😅Ño Ño Ño no te pongas 😊de lo q me lo 😊a la Sra 😊y 😊ste y se le va 😊a las cosas que le hicieron y le a pasado pasado eso es que se le hizo la comida pero ya le dije a la distancia de lo de las acciones que se les dio para el trabajo que le dio la señora que me dio el año y que le dijo y no se olvide de darme el molde qué les dio de los dos cierres qué se lo q en su cuarto el día 😊😊i

    • @rachmielbenberel
      @rachmielbenberel 8 месяцев назад +1

      I enjoy viewing your work. One possible correction to this video. The image shown in the frame entitled, "1909, New York City, Columbus Celebration," appears to be Washington, D.C. rather than New York City.

  • @newmankidman5763
    @newmankidman5763 Год назад +10

    This makes me realise that we are but dust in the wind of time, and soon to be gone and forgotten

    • @timkoontz6693
      @timkoontz6693 Год назад +1

      "... dust in the wind...", jeeze, now just where have I heard that one before? Oh yeah, Kansas' "Point of no Return" album (1977), "Dust in the Wind."

    • @newmankidman5763
      @newmankidman5763 Год назад

      @@timkoontz6693, I had never heard of that album before

    • @jody6851
      @jody6851 10 месяцев назад

      Tell that to all the prima donnas in politics, finance, and in the entertainment industry.

    • @newmankidman5763
      @newmankidman5763 10 месяцев назад

      @@jody6851, at least we get entertained by the latter :)

  • @here_we_go_again2571
    @here_we_go_again2571 Год назад +4

    @ 8:21 ... Oh the irony of a sweet shop with a dental parlor next door!
    Thank you for sharing :)

  • @beatrizrobinson6481
    @beatrizrobinson6481 10 месяцев назад +1

    I was raised in Brooklyn New York, across Prospect Park West. That era people were well dressed. It is very sad times have changed. Thank you for the memories.

  • @bevygaines
    @bevygaines Год назад +1

    This was a nice video, loved the bicycles and the pretty flowers.

  • @theresebuczek4685
    @theresebuczek4685 Месяц назад +1

    Great photos thanks for sharing

  • @christiancorgier13
    @christiancorgier13 9 месяцев назад +3

    Merci. L upscall c est vraiment génial. Photos magnifique

    • @BrightStyle
      @BrightStyle  9 месяцев назад

      Merci beaucoup

    • @christiancorgier13
      @christiancorgier13 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@BrightStyle bonne journee de la part d un passionnée d images je m abonne.

  • @pbasswil
    @pbasswil Год назад +5

    You have to be impressed at how photography had already evolved, technologically, in the 60-odd years since it was invented (it only started reaching the consumer in the 1840s). From messing around with house-hold chemicals & eggs & stuff at the beginning, they figured out how to capture all this _amazing_ detail! Sure it's digitally sharpened and cleaned up (and colored); but the basic information had to have been chemically encoded, well over 100 years ago. By the Edwardian era here, their photo technology was already _awesome!_

    • @canuckprogressive.3435
      @canuckprogressive.3435 Год назад +2

      Yes it was. They had lots of stuff figured out by then just fine.

    • @pbasswil
      @pbasswil Год назад +3

      @@canuckprogressive.3435 I guess the biggest explosion of development usually happens near the beginning of any technology. The excitement of its arrival means that a lot of young creative minds start fiddling around with it, trying to push the bar forward. For instance, powered flight's biggest developments happened within its first two decades; got another, ~7 year boost @ WW II; and since then has slowed down considerably.

    • @canuckprogressive.3435
      @canuckprogressive.3435 Год назад

      @@pbasswil Right. By about 1916 they were building airplanes I would love to get my hands on and take for a spin.

    • @pbasswil
      @pbasswil Год назад +2

      @@canuckprogressive.3435 And the technological difference between the Wright Flyer and a late WW I fighter are head-spinning. After just 13 to 15 years of development. And by the first real airliners of the 1920s, you're talking about a living room in the sky - pretty safe, and relatively rapid.

  • @martagrant2908
    @martagrant2908 Год назад +9

    Thanks for sharing this amazing video 🙂

  • @argee36
    @argee36 Год назад +4

    65 wonderful pictures. Your work brings the past back to life. These are the best colorized and most interesting old photos I've seen to date.

  • @scotnick59
    @scotnick59 Год назад +5

    Colorization is just excellent!!

  • @timtoner1411
    @timtoner1411 Год назад +2

    Color adds a lot & does bring these images closer to our modern times.

    • @BrightStyle
      @BrightStyle  Год назад

      Thank you so much for your comment!

  • @donbestul8492
    @donbestul8492 Год назад +9

    thank you very much for these pictures, the world had more color than what we think they had back then

    • @BrightStyle
      @BrightStyle  Год назад

      Thank you so much for your comment!

    • @canuckprogressive.3435
      @canuckprogressive.3435 Год назад

      I am pretty sure the world was always full of colour. Ah, actually, everything seems to be getting painted grey now for some reason.

  • @PIKE-qi2qe
    @PIKE-qi2qe Год назад +3

    i am very surplised! this pictures..very beautiful !!

  • @luisnavarro9307
    @luisnavarro9307 Год назад +2

    l love the clarity of the photos, excellent job.

  • @ronleight9341
    @ronleight9341 Год назад +4

    If i had to choose a business based on what i saw in these photos, i think i would open a hat store!

  • @eugenirniger2936
    @eugenirniger2936 Год назад +1

    Amazing pictures, nice Jazz-Trio music, who is playing?

  • @Thyaggo.Maciel
    @Thyaggo.Maciel Год назад +1

    Very photos, thanks for sharing my friend! 💚✨

  • @LR-ee2uu
    @LR-ee2uu Год назад +1

    All now nothing but pixels, but they all had their story.
    We should all be thankful for cameras.

  • @hirenpatel5015
    @hirenpatel5015 Год назад +3

    Wow !!! Great pictures Unbelievable ,never seen before ! Thanks bro !

  • @robtyman4281
    @robtyman4281 Год назад +5

    The 'Spring Flower Show' photo is the odd one out here. It doesn't 'sync' timewise with any of the other photos - because it's from a different time period. It looks like sometime in the 1920's.......and post WW1. All the other photos are all pre-WW1. The womens clothing and hats give it away.
    The hemlines are higher, and women in the 1890's and first decade of the 20th century didn't wear 'bowl' hats.....they would have worn more decorative wide brim hats....with bird feathers adorning them.
    The hats in this pic are more simple and modern looking....which fitted the fashion and look of the 1920's.

  • @stevenhoman2253
    @stevenhoman2253 Год назад +1

    Absolutely wonderful to reflect upon.

  • @ellenmorrison6215
    @ellenmorrison6215 Год назад +2

    1909, New York City, Columbus Celebration at 7:14 appears to be Pennsylvania Ave., NW. note the Capitol dome in the background and the route sign on the streetcar in the foreground. Definitely Washington, DC.

  • @alfredturnowsky2546
    @alfredturnowsky2546 Год назад +4

    Wie immer sehr schöne und interessante Fotos. Bin immer wieder begeistert.

  • @igrdcjjn
    @igrdcjjn Год назад +2

    Fotos incríveis! Parabéns! Um dia passaremos, nos voltemos para O SENHOR JESUS CRISTO para sermos salvos! Pr. Cássio Roberto.

  • @beverlyledbetter4906
    @beverlyledbetter4906 Год назад +4

    The 1900s was really the 20th century, the 1800s was the 1900s. I don't know why they did it that way, but these pictures are gorgeous!☺️

    • @pbasswil
      @pbasswil Год назад +6

      "I don't know why they did it that way": If you were numbering centuries in the 'Common Era' or CE (= since Christianity), what would you call the century that starts at the birth of Jesus? The century that starts at the year 1 CE (formerly AD)? That would have to be 'The 1st century CE', right? So then, the century starting at 101 CE would already be the '2nd century CE', and so on. Therefore, every century's number is always 1 digit ahead of the beginning of one of its year's name; e.g., we're in 2023, in the _21st_ century. (Btw, there is no year called 0 CE/AD; the common era starts at 1 CE, which is the next year after 1 BCE - Before Common Era.)

    • @user-eb5cb6ud1p
      @user-eb5cb6ud1p 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@pbasswilIn addition the common calendar ends centuries on the "hundreds" year because as you emphasized there was no Year 0. I.e. the 19th century was 1801-1900, the 21st is 2001 to 2100, and so on.
      I had to look through old texts while doing research at work. Apparently most people in the 1800s were familiar with that little twist, but the emphasis on Y2K led many people to think the new century - and millennium - started with 2000 instead of 2001.

  • @A3A3
    @A3A3 4 месяца назад

    Wow

  • @priceless2382
    @priceless2382 Год назад

    🎉🎉🎉

  • @timkoontz6693
    @timkoontz6693 Год назад +2

    @7:17 Columbus celebration, that's the UNITED STATES CAPITOL, Washington, D.C. in the background... SHEESH!
    🤦🏼

  • @lesleyjane7785
    @lesleyjane7785 Год назад +4

    Okay, I have to ask... at the time stamp of 7:11 .... it says 1909, New York City, Columbus celebration... yeah. No. See the Capitol Building?

  • @JohnForbes-wd2nh
    @JohnForbes-wd2nh Год назад

    Columbus celebration Photo is Washington DC. Capitol building in background and the street car is going to 28th and Penn ave NW

  • @irvingr.fatback886
    @irvingr.fatback886 11 месяцев назад

    That’s what I call really old timey!

  • @pbasswil
    @pbasswil Год назад

    You had to get the '1890' in the title, huh? And then mostly show 20th century shots, up to & including the late 1920s. Anyway, there are _some_ very late 19th century; and all are beautifully edited and colored.

  • @susanr.562
    @susanr.562 Год назад +2

    7:16 NOT New York! The street is Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, DC. U.S. Capitol building in background.

  • @jeanmichellorenzo3672
    @jeanmichellorenzo3672 Год назад +2

    Fantastic pictures, but at 1:23 I 'm sure it's from a recent movie scene from 1990's...

  • @MarkusDinkler
    @MarkusDinkler Год назад +1

    100 Jahre später und schon zuvor wurden die vermutlich prächtigen Bauten abgerissen und durch Wolkenkratzer ersetzt. Schade so wie in dem Movie war New York um ein Vielfaches schöner, das leider Vergangenheit ist

  • @merilumariana2018
    @merilumariana2018 Год назад +1

  • @rma3_3_3
    @rma3_3_3 Год назад +2

    ♡♡♡

  • @jayjay-bz3rr
    @jayjay-bz3rr Год назад

    I’m here for the cool Jazz

  • @マンデブラ
    @マンデブラ Год назад +1

    100年前も、今も、ほとんど変わらない。

  • @vincenzocastiglia8533
    @vincenzocastiglia8533 Год назад

    Very beautiful picture.3❤❤ 😂

  • @pbasswil
    @pbasswil Год назад +1

    I kinda liked the 'lite' jazz soundtrack. But what made them match it to this _much_ older visual content? It's modern musicians playing roughly in 1950s cocktail style. Maybe whoever colored & assembled the photos is young enough to associate anything before the 1960s as all in the same cubbyhole: "Old" ??

    • @thereunionparty
      @thereunionparty Год назад +1

      I thought it was a mismatch too (and I'm less tolerant of this type of jazz also). Surely a better choice would have been some ragtime music?

    • @pbasswil
      @pbasswil Год назад +1

      @@thereunionparty Yup, ragtime would be better - _anything_ closer to the time period would be better. Edwardians would _hate_ the chromatic & dense harmony of this cocktail-ized bebop jazz, and they wouldn't 'get' the swung rhythms, either.

  • @vandanerisgomes9009
    @vandanerisgomes9009 Год назад +1

    Muito bom gostei

  • @dirkpotzeba7034
    @dirkpotzeba7034 Год назад

    5:40 Looks more like the 20's!

  • @moshar12
    @moshar12 Год назад +1

    @17:15 is Washington D.C. 'not' New York City!

  • @canuckprogressive.3435
    @canuckprogressive.3435 Год назад

    This is great but AI sure does add some strange colours!

  • @paulwebbiweb
    @paulwebbiweb Год назад +2

    The "newsies" were a lot smaller than the ones who go on strike in the musical!

  • @Keebrantado
    @Keebrantado Год назад

    Up!

  • @georgburdzinski1699
    @georgburdzinski1699 Год назад +1

    Te zdjecia to vehicles czasu.

  • @ddevonlw
    @ddevonlw Год назад +3

    wow!...How did you do that? no camera of that time would have been able to produce that amount of detail.

    • @IvanIvanouv
      @IvanIvanouv Год назад

      This is done with the help of a neural network. Many photos are painted very poorly with typical errors for neural networks.

    • @canuckprogressive.3435
      @canuckprogressive.3435 Год назад +3

      They were indeed able to take sharp, detailed photos back then. Fast action was a problem and of course no colour but still.

    • @user-eb5cb6ud1p
      @user-eb5cb6ud1p 5 месяцев назад +1

      And your proof?
      Film detail is determined by the "granularity" of the emulsion used. It was WELL within the chemistry of the time to produce highly-detailed photos.

  • @rezamotori5709
    @rezamotori5709 Год назад +1

    1:30 that bagel seller in the right down corner...............................what do those hebrew letters say?.....is that "kosher" ?

  • @almendraable
    @almendraable Год назад

    Daily life 1904 is from a movie!!😂

  • @vandanerisgomes9009
    @vandanerisgomes9009 Год назад

    Lindo

  • @jameswillett7186
    @jameswillett7186 Год назад

    At 1:37 that's the 1920's.

  • @josephsylve6758
    @josephsylve6758 Год назад +3

    Too colorfull IMO but thank you for the work anyway

    • @donbestul8492
      @donbestul8492 Год назад

      if you research the era, they really were more colorful than we think they were, we are just used to black and white pictures and think that's what it looked like

    • @josephsylve6758
      @josephsylve6758 Год назад

      ​@@donbestul8492 I'm pretty sure a facade with 10 different colors never was a thing.

    • @marashdemnika5833
      @marashdemnika5833 Год назад

      That the Same thing about classical civilization. When it comes to the Roman Empire, one common misconception is that Rome was all about pristine white marble and flashy gold embellishments. However, the reality is far more colorful - almost to the point of appearing gaudy.

  • @COLLSWORK
    @COLLSWORK 29 дней назад

    @10:29 ???

  • @ritsuko757
    @ritsuko757 Год назад

    インフラないのに、なさそうなのに、何で出来ているかが不明の時代

  • @lesleyjane7785
    @lesleyjane7785 Год назад +1

    Also, the Els were all one color. Not some red, some blue... who do you have doing this? 9 year olds?

    • @connie7128
      @connie7128 Год назад

      You do it then, start your own channel, and post your work. Then we'll see how fantastic your thrilling work is. Some of us are just happy to see old photos, we don't nitpik everything apart like a clown.

    • @lesleyjane7785
      @lesleyjane7785 Год назад

      @@connie7128 by the way, it's not like I didn't enjoy watching your work. so there's that. Much Love, Jesus

  • @jerdonsbabbler3515
    @jerdonsbabbler3515 Год назад

    @brightstyle I'm not subscribing if you use a computer voice. It's creepy and you're cheap for using it.

    • @connie7128
      @connie7128 Год назад

      Rather harsh. For all you know, the person is unable to speak for some reason, or has trouble speaking. What a ridiculous comment. Get out of here..

    • @jerdonsbabbler3515
      @jerdonsbabbler3515 Год назад

      @@connie7128 Well, of course, you’re right if that’s actually a live voice done by someone with a vocal issue. But that seems unlikely here. At least to me.

  • @SirKenchalot
    @SirKenchalot Год назад

    You lost me at 'progressive.'

    • @connie7128
      @connie7128 Год назад +1

      You lost me at this silly comment.

    • @SirKenchalot
      @SirKenchalot Год назад

      @@connie7128 Jane, do you need me to explain it?