One thing I like about bro Hajji, even thou I may differ with him, I can never disagree against him as everything he says, he backs it with proof, Alhamdulillah. So many people out there say this is wrong, that is wrong but they are just blanket statements. When bro Hajji brings anything up, he references the stance. This keeps me in check, if I'm doing something different to what bro Hajji is saying I will look into it, if what I am doing has no basis/evidence i would change my stance on the matter, if there is evidence, Alhamdulillah. As I said, it keeps me in check, always looking into my madhab, creed and rectifying. This Abu musab says so many blanket statements without bringing proofs. He says this is wrong, that is wrong, but doesn't attach evidence to it. Even thou there's clear evidence for it. He doesn't understand ihktilaaf and by not understanding it, he disregards so many other sahih masail. Bro Hajji brings everything to the table.. He includes most opinions on matters and doesn't hide anything, unlike other guys like this shrek fellow. Like this shrek guy hasn't looked into any of bro Hajjis beliefs or stances and labels him as misguided on the basis he's talking against MIAW, who isn't a Saint himself, massacring people, and shrek defending this massacre. ISIS are doing the same thing today.
True say bro the fact he even shows books he’s referencing with the pages and litterally backs his points like this show the other guys are not accepting the evidence but stick to they blind following
Why don't you look at the matter from a different angle? Let me break it down for you. My clip, from which this refutation came about, was not mean to be an in depth study on the matter. It was a casual tangent while covering the Tafseer of an Ayah. For that clip to be used as a source in the first place is indicative of how low the standards have become. I have a whole podcast with Jalal Abulrub about MIAW. that would have been more worthy of the refutation. In addition, you excitement and amazement at someone merely quoting books which are written to refute MIAW is astonishing to say the least. These are subjective opinions of men which can EASILY be refuted with other subjective opinions of other men who endorse what he believed and did. Do you not have any basic knowledge of how our Deen works? Where is the Quraan and Sunnah in all this? Are you not supposed to refer matters to them? Are you deciding what the truth is based on excerpts Hajji (poorly) reads from some book, which was most likely purchased with the very intent to discredit MIAW? C'mon bro. Please be fair to yourself. We never claimed MIAW was a saint nor did we suggest he did not make mistakes. Guess what, he isn't the only one. The early generations of Muslims, as early as the Sahaba, fought and engaged in war and each was seeking the truth and doing his Ijtihaad. That entailed loss of life also. Lastly, riding Hajji's wave of calling me Shrek is really sad. Yes, I said he looked like a crackhead in order to treat him with the same fashion he treats others with. He has been calling me names for some time and he apologizes and then falls back on his heels. Notice I never called him a crackhead rather I said he looks like one. On the other hand, he has called me every name under the sun. Trust me, I have a tongue sharp enough to put all of you in tears. However, I strive, like we all should, to restrain myself for the sake of Allaah. Wa Assalaam Wajdi Akkari
@OneWayToParadise Good to see you here 😂. I always stated you are weak-minded, hence we see your regular ranting under my comment section or my Live Chat. I would like to add, I can easily dissect your podcast with Jalal Abu Rabb, the reason why I am not responding to respect the brother due to his age, and I promise you, if he wasn’t an elder, he would have heard some home truths. You know it, there is a big paradigm shift because of our videos about this topic. This won’t be my last response to you. The amount of blunders you make consistently shows you are so programmed and deluded it’s scary. The tide is now changing, your plastic methodology is facing the strong torrent and as you can tell from my recent poll and under my comment sections. The people are seeing the reality of your spiritual forefather of ISIS - Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab. ‘Subjective opinions of men’ - Tarikh Najd written by Ibn Ghannam who was instructed by Muhammad ibn Wahab to write the events of what took place, was an eye-witness, as well as Ibn Bishr. You cannot argue this is subjective because in a video coming soon, I will present direct statements from Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab’s Rasaail making direct takfeer on the grand scholars of his time, which was used to declare blanket Takfeer on regions in order to kill and loot their property. I’m not gonna waste my time with a back and forth on here. The harsh reality is you and your likes know deep-down Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab and his bandits are the root and source for ISIS. Denial is not a river in Egypt!
@@BroHajji Well brother if you were fair, which you are not, you would have noticed that you posted around 20 posts about me between Twitter, Community and your (Hollywood -like) trailers and shorts. In those many posts, you and your lovely followers insulted and slandered me hundreds of times and I could have easily been there to reply but I did not. So you will use my first interaction with you during that live session and this single reply to a person's comment to suggest that I am weak-minded? How much of a liar and oppressor can you be my beloved brother? Do you really have to twist matters to gain empathy and support or to put a smile on your viewer's face? Is it worth it? Either way, I commented to achieve 2 goals. One, I still hope Allaah will guide you to be better and see the light. Second, I truly feel that your crowd deserves better and should know some basics that you fail in communicating to them. Have you not noticed that your supporters comprise of all types of deviants? People that you otherwise would not agree with either? They have the right to know that you are not being fair or well-mannered at all. While most will ignore the message and cheer you on, some will see you for what you are and take heed. So you now have manners? His old age prevented you from sharing the truth with the people? Are you kidding me? I know that the views with the filthy ads which precede them help you out. This alone is a sign of insincerity. But can you be so insincere that you compromise the truth due to a man's age? Bro you are giving away your good deeds speaking ill about a man who returned to His Lord. You are still alive and you will be held accountable for these atrocities you are causing. Your followers, sadly, are a bunch of overzealous haters who are fuming with anger and hostility. You are adding fuel to that fire. You are not exposing anything that has not been done already and all those efforts did not bear any fruits. If you only knew. May Allaah guide you habeebee.
Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari has been notorious in spreading the Pseudo-Salafi methodology and attacking those who oppose it. This video will focus on his recent videos, he attacks known Dawah figures aggressively for their positions against Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab. The inconsistencies and hypocrisies will be clear for all to see. #brohajji #salafi #speakerscorner
4:49 Absolutely repulsive. This man casually speaks about Ibn Abdul Wahhab like he’s some prophet sent to the misguided Muslims and then he goes about his day like nothing happened. 🥴
So far, I've observed Shamsi, Dawan Man, ARH, Abu Usamah ad Dhahabi, Jalal AbualRub, Assim al Hakeem, and Mufti Muneer in regards to their commentary of MIAW. NONE of them answered the questions Brohajji has raised from quoting from these books. None of them picked up the books Brohajji highlighted and tried to comment on them. To me, this shows that either they are taken aback and don't know how to respond to these narrations which shows the actions of MIAW or they are trying to ignore it and don't want to interpret it lest they come to concede to this reality. So far all they have been doing is brushing it off as to defend MIAW by saying whatever he did was right and all the narratives out there are just trying to portray him as evil. This is somewhat disingenuous.
AbualRub is not only intellectually dishonest but dishonest in general. He has written books about MIAW and continuously prattles what a great man he was, all the while equating those who do Mawlid as no better than Christians (essentially, takfeer of a large amount of people). I expect nothing from him, may Allah guide him and those whom he has misguided.
They can't respond and they know if they address the claims their misguided neo-salafi methodology will crumble as MIAW is the founder of their corrupt ideology. So they lie, slander, and insult to uphold their lie and bankrupt ideology. A sad existence this lot has. They should just stop living a lie and acknowldge the truth, for the sake of their own souls. MIAW doesn't own Islam. Islam existed over a thousand years before MIAW
I am actually shocked at how much can certain ideologies be followed. Anyone that has an inch of objectivness on this matter knows that they are full of inconsitencies and problems.
He thinks he is the only Muslim. Like his father ibn Abdul Wahhab. Bro Hajji never left the fold of Islam but according to his own testimony he was a Budist a Rapper. I think when you are a Budhist you can't be a Muslim. So how dare you and call a Muslim a Crackhead.
Mustafa Sabri Efendi, the last SheikhulIslam of the Ottoman Empire, tells in his work Mevkif'ul-Akl 👇 [If the state leaves the line of Islam, "Obeying the dictates of religion is not the business of the government. It is only the business of society." says, this is to separate religion from the state. In such a case, the state apostatized (abandoned religion). If the society consents to such a government, or if the government will make laws by taking the society's proxy in the parliament (that is, by voting), the society will become apostate just as the government is apostate. In this case, the following verse applies to both that government and that ummah: "Those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed, they are the disbelievers themselves." (Surah Maida, Verse 44) A political regime that accepts the principle of secularism means that it has rebelled against the rules of Islam. Therefore, first of all, this government apostatized, and then those who obeyed this administration became apostates one by one. Just as those who take part in the political administration are apostates one by one, the masses obeying this government also fall into apostasy (kufr).] (Mavkif'ul-Akıl, 4/280)
His narcissim is so apparent. His holier than thou is so apparent and obnoxious its embarrassing. If we are not on your manhaj we're automatically deviants?
@@Kimeikus exactly why you can never reason with many hard core salafis. narcissists will only change their mind for selfish reasons. like children they need to be enticed with sweets to think differently.
He’s living a nice comfy life expenses paid by the KSA. Cuz he 👅 their 🥾 real hard. He even perfumizes theirs farts . He isn’t changing his mind anytime soon. Unless maybe if they decide to get rid of him and deems him unimportant.
@@ryancooper3449 Facts. You can only convince the ignorant people among them such as myself. It only took like three refutation videos or so and I realized their main talking points that they repeat all the time are absolute blunders.
A very good refutation against the likes of Akkari, and any other "WahhabiBots". Brother Hajji definitely put in the work. بارك الله فيه وحفظه. I usually tell people who don't know about the history of Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab and his connection with the Aal Saud, that in a nutshell, Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab was the so-called "brains" of the operation, and the Sauds were his "thug enforcers". The Sauds and their ancestors have always been enemies of the Deen, hence the reason they only kill Muslims. They have never fought against any non-Muslim armies. Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab just gave the Aal Saud's massacre of Muslims an "air of legitimacy". Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab himself, I believe, just had an inferiority complex, stemming perhaps from jealousy and maybe "daddy issues" where he didn't receive enough attention. والله أعلم
The majority of us laymen don't have a clue because we may not understand arabic. The thing is the vast majority of authentic books are all in arabic hence why we are hidden from it all by these bootlickers. We rely on someones commentary but when you read the raw texts the truth is revealed. Keep up the solid work brother haji.
Allah gave you a special skill br hajji so Please use it with hikmah. What you're doing is clarifying concepts and at the same time, mocking the brother, calling him Shrek and what not. Would the prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم advise like that?
Petro dollars and the help of Western imperialism has helped spread Saudi Salafists. In all fairness though, today they've become the main defenders of 'traditional islam'.
Dont downplay Saudi role in Osama Bin Laden, 9/11 and formation of daesh, all of which have made orthodox Muslims look intolerant and evil. There is schism between real Salafis and their modernised leaders who want a moderate Islam.
Brother hajji you are refuting all these speakers, but what are you presenting yourself ? Why are you bias in your refutation when speakers like YQ, yaqeen Institute and modern orientalists are causing more damage then these guys who are calling towards orthodox Quran and sunnah atleast. They aren't calling in reformation of islam, doubt in the preservation of Quran nor are they siding with LGBTQ.
This guy is an ex rapper who didn’t make it and become a Salafi priest instead just like Shamsi couldn’t make it as a criminal so he became a Salafi preacher Salafism is their Plan B
You give him too much credit to call him a ‘rapper’. He wasn’t even a lyricist that contributed to that ‘Scums of the Earth’ hippie buddhist vegan rap group. His friend and brother in law was the rapper and used to bring him along to the studio. He never rapped nor wrote a page of lyrics. He just piggybacked on the group leaders fame to make himself appear bigger then he was.
He deleted this comment under his video, so this shows his insincerity: “The scholars have said that certainly, the one who is an Imam for an oppressive ruler, no prayer is to be made behind him, except if he reveals his excuse [for his treachery] or repents from it.” [Tafsīr al-Qurtubī, al-Jāmi’ li-Ahkām al-Qur’ān), 10/373] The position of Imam al-Qurtubi is merely for an oppressive ruler (who is muslim). Can you imagine praying behind an imam who calls to disbelief? Harb Al-Kirmāni (died 280 AH), the disciple of Imam Ahmad said: "With three kinds of people there is no inviolability and (no prohibition of) defamation: 1. The unjust ruler 2. The sinner who openly reveals his sin 3. The follower of innovation (Bid'ah)." [Kitab as Sunnah 656] Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or is being oppressed.” It was said, “O Messenger of Allah, we help the oppressed, but how do we help an oppressor?” The Prophet said, “By seizing his hand.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2444, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2584 Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim. Jabir reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The master of martyrs on the Day of Resurrection is Hamzah ibn ‘Abdil Muttalib and a man who stands up to a tyrannical authority, commanding good and forbidding evil and he is killed for it.” Source: al-Majrūḥīn li-Ibn Ḥibbān 1/157 Grade: Sahih according to Al-Albani Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 18449 Grade: Sahih according to Al-Nawawi. Abu Bakr ra: I have been given the authority over you, and I am not the best of you. If I do well, help me; and if I do wrong, set me right. Sincere regard for truth is loyalty and disregard for truth is treachery. The weak amongst you shall be strong with me until I have secured his rights if God wills, and the strong amongst you shall be weak with me until I have wrested from him the rights of others if God wills. Obey me so long as I obey God and His Messenger. But if I disobey God and His Messenger, you owe me no obedience. Arise for your prayer, God have mercy upon you. (Al-Bidaayah wan-Nihaayah 6:305, 306) And from Kaab al-Ahbar that he said, 'The community will be good if the governor/commander is good and will be bad if he is bad.' [Hilyatul Awliya 5/367] The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: 'Two camps of my Ummah, if these are good, the (remaining) people are also good, and if they are bad, the (remaining) people are bad too: the rulers and the scholars.' [Narrated by ibn Abdilbarr, Abu Nuaym and al-Gazali] 8/73 And those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one Khalifah - chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be Fitnah (wars, battles, polytheism, etc.) and oppression on earth, and a great mischief and corruption (appearance of polytheism). Prophet Muhammad ﷺ: “Verily, tyrannical rulers will come after me and whoever affirms their lies and supports their oppression has nothing to do with me and I have nothing to do with him, and he will not drink with me at the fountain in Paradise." {Sunan al-Nasa’i 4207}
I have some concerns about criticizing the Salafi because now Sufi are using these mistakes to further their innovations I am a huge follower of Muhammad Yasir Al Hanafi which originally brought me away from Salafiyyah but there are good Salafi like Mufti Muneer and Abu Tamiyyah
Dawah Man read the Hadith: “Your Lord does not have one eye.” and then he concluded that Allah has 2 eyes 🤣 What is it with these guys and anthropomorphic interpretations? 😭
@@Kimeikus they’re merely affirming what allah and his messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said. The prophet said “Allah is not ONE EYED” he didn’t say Allah has no eyes. وحملنه على ذات ألواح ودسر تجري بأعيننا جزاءً لمن كان كفر
Bro Haji I am new to your channel so please forgive me for asking this. Can you do a historical review of all mislim that were killeb by mohamed bin abdulwahab. It makes me upset when i hear people equating Sheikhul Islam Ibn Taymiya with ibn abdulwahab. In my humble learned view these two opposing fogures in islam. Ibn Taymiya i think is a towering figure of knowledge but followers of ibn wahab now quote ibn Taymiya then most of us assume these two men held the same view. Ibn abdulwahab has be judged by hos actions in killing so many muslims and his books which probably contain alot of islamic truths. What makes him wrong is the way he applied huduud on many of our predecessors who really didn't deserve it. I could be wrong so i would be grateful for any corrections etc.
Funny how name calling and straight cursing is something that’s so clapped for in this video , on both sides , RUclips worries on horses , why not debate face to face in a civilised manner both of you. Or for your dignity, sanity and saving others from the fitnah keep quite like the rest.
Bro, tell this to the “Salafis” 😂 They’re the ones who refuse to debate. If there are any barriers between discourse and reconciliation, “Salafis” are the ones who constructed them.
@@Kimeikusbro are we not meant to be salafis lol meaning in the sense of the way of the salaf-saliheen , what proof is there they refused, and it doesn’t help cursing and acting un Islamic and going outright against the advice of the Prophets (SAW) advice on akhlaaq is a solution, leave alone laughing at things even silence could be approval of such behaviour
Brother Hajji - can you respond to that 3hr long 1dawah vid? They keep saying they’ve refuted you + it’s starting to cause some doubts among the brothers. Apparently their sheikh wrote a book addressing your points.
ruclips.net/p/PLZjQgCP-RJfL4q-7M59sxtUL3XncYqMdz The Old Shaykh doesn’t do himself any favours with that response tbh. Out of respect for his age, I am not responding because I could embarrass him very easily. The playlist is sufficient and more videos will be uploaded soon.
@@BroHajji You are a jahil that you don't know ibn taymiyyah did Not excuse in the foundation of the Deen. Do your research and then come back to me and say I'm wrong so I can embarrass you and show your followers how ignorant you.
QUIT JUDGING YOUR FELLOW MUSLIMS. Why publicly shame the faults of your brother. This not islam. Delete these videos. Yall could have had one phone call and settled it. Youre just using his name for fame. Leave him alone
Speaking of Qatif, have you read the book "A Cry From Qatif" by a Shiy'iy reformist? It's the same modus operandi. It's the books they read! The Salaafi "scholars" are doing to their Salaafi flock the very same thing the Shiy'a "scholars" are doing to their Shiy'a flock. They are manipulating and distorting the Kalaam of the 'ulamaa and aimma creating boxheads. I'm a telling you, the root/source of the evil and corruption are in the upper echelon of the Salaafi strata, the Mashuyukh. The underlings are just brainwashed idiots who regurgitate their programming. Who are producing and outputing the Salaafiyya's programming syllabus?
Where has he supported shirk? Slandering is a massive sin! There is shirk happening in Saudi Arabia right now. It is your MBS who is the modernist and is praised by people like Jay Smith for slowly destroying Islam. We will call this out, and ignoring this just shows where your moral compass is.
O Kafir! What I hear is you just arguing in a circle. So if Sheikh Abdul Wahhab (rahimehullah) raids the people of Al-Aqsa and steals from them and kills them, it's haram because you assume them to be muslim. But if someone assumes them to be mushrikeen (those people of Al-Aqsa) you resort to shaming them for being "closeted takfiris". It just doesn't make sense, and holds no inherent values. And since you compared the rule of the Ottomans over Al-Aqsa painting them in a way that they are better muslims, or muslims at all shows. No, the Ottomans were not muslims, they were sufis, dervishes, grave worshippers, they ruled by jahiliyyah etc... This leads me to believe that you lack fundamentals of the Islamic faith, like disbelief in the tagut and mushrikeen comes before you can have iman in Allah. So I advise you and the person you are adressing in the video to look into the true meaning of the shahada, the connection between aqeedah and the hokm of Allah, subhanahu wa ta'ala, and He knows best.
Why are you calling him a kafir? Can’t you see you’re the exact type of person we’re warning about? Just because someone does not agree with you you can’t call them a kafir! Astaghfirullah.
@@crysw6281 Takfir is actually of Aslu deen. Although me calling him a kafir might have been unnecessary in my comment, but it definitely isn't incorrect or a sin. In fact one can't establish Islam without the takfir of the disbelievers. I advise you to learn and study the basics of Islam if you fear Allah and the Day of Judgement. Learn proper aqedah and tawheed, but don't learn it from Bro Hajji and his scholars, nor from OneWayToParadise and his scholars, they are from the deviants.
One thing I like about bro Hajji, even thou I may differ with him, I can never disagree against him as everything he says, he backs it with proof, Alhamdulillah.
So many people out there say this is wrong, that is wrong but they are just blanket statements.
When bro Hajji brings anything up, he references the stance.
This keeps me in check, if I'm doing something different to what bro Hajji is saying I will look into it, if what I am doing has no basis/evidence i would change my stance on the matter, if there is evidence, Alhamdulillah.
As I said, it keeps me in check, always looking into my madhab, creed and rectifying.
This Abu musab says so many blanket statements without bringing proofs. He says this is wrong, that is wrong, but doesn't attach evidence to it. Even thou there's clear evidence for it. He doesn't understand ihktilaaf and by not understanding it, he disregards so many other sahih masail.
Bro Hajji brings everything to the table.. He includes most opinions on matters and doesn't hide anything, unlike other guys like this shrek fellow.
Like this shrek guy hasn't looked into any of bro Hajjis beliefs or stances and labels him as misguided on the basis he's talking against MIAW, who isn't a Saint himself, massacring people, and shrek defending this massacre. ISIS are doing the same thing today.
Exactly 💯
True say bro the fact he even shows books he’s referencing with the pages and litterally backs his points like this show the other guys are not accepting the evidence but stick to they blind following
Why don't you look at the matter from a different angle? Let me break it down for you.
My clip, from which this refutation came about, was not mean to be an in depth study on the matter. It was a casual tangent while covering the Tafseer of an Ayah. For that clip to be used as a source in the first place is indicative of how low the standards have become. I have a whole podcast with Jalal Abulrub about MIAW. that would have been more worthy of the refutation.
In addition, you excitement and amazement at someone merely quoting books which are written to refute MIAW is astonishing to say the least. These are subjective opinions of men which can EASILY be refuted with other subjective opinions of other men who endorse what he believed and did.
Do you not have any basic knowledge of how our Deen works? Where is the Quraan and Sunnah in all this? Are you not supposed to refer matters to them? Are you deciding what the truth is based on excerpts Hajji (poorly) reads from some book, which was most likely purchased with the very intent to discredit MIAW? C'mon bro. Please be fair to yourself.
We never claimed MIAW was a saint nor did we suggest he did not make mistakes. Guess what, he isn't the only one. The early generations of Muslims, as early as the Sahaba, fought and engaged in war and each was seeking the truth and doing his Ijtihaad. That entailed loss of life also.
Lastly, riding Hajji's wave of calling me Shrek is really sad. Yes, I said he looked like a crackhead in order to treat him with the same fashion he treats others with. He has been calling me names for some time and he apologizes and then falls back on his heels. Notice I never called him a crackhead rather I said he looks like one. On the other hand, he has called me every name under the sun. Trust me, I have a tongue sharp enough to put all of you in tears. However, I strive, like we all should, to restrain myself for the sake of Allaah.
Wa Assalaam
Wajdi Akkari
@OneWayToParadise Good to see you here 😂. I always stated you are weak-minded, hence we see your regular ranting under my comment section or my Live Chat.
I would like to add, I can easily dissect your podcast with Jalal Abu Rabb, the reason why I am not responding to respect the brother due to his age, and I promise you, if he wasn’t an elder, he would have heard some home truths.
You know it, there is a big paradigm shift because of our videos about this topic.
This won’t be my last response to you. The amount of blunders you make consistently shows you are so programmed and deluded it’s scary.
The tide is now changing, your plastic methodology is facing the strong torrent and as you can tell from my recent poll and under my comment sections. The people are seeing the reality of your spiritual forefather of ISIS - Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab.
‘Subjective opinions of men’ - Tarikh Najd written by Ibn Ghannam who was instructed by Muhammad ibn Wahab to write the events of what took place, was an eye-witness, as well as Ibn Bishr. You cannot argue this is subjective because in a video coming soon, I will present direct statements from Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab’s Rasaail making direct takfeer on the grand scholars of his time, which was used to declare blanket Takfeer on regions in order to kill and loot their property.
I’m not gonna waste my time with a back and forth on here. The harsh reality is you and your likes know deep-down Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab and his bandits are the root and source for ISIS.
Denial is not a river in Egypt!
@@BroHajji Well brother if you were fair, which you are not, you would have noticed that you posted around 20 posts about me between Twitter, Community and your (Hollywood -like) trailers and shorts. In those many posts, you and your lovely followers insulted and slandered me hundreds of times and I could have easily been there to reply but I did not. So you will use my first interaction with you during that live session and this single reply to a person's comment to suggest that I am weak-minded? How much of a liar and oppressor can you be my beloved brother? Do you really have to twist matters to gain empathy and support or to put a smile on your viewer's face? Is it worth it?
Either way, I commented to achieve 2 goals. One, I still hope Allaah will guide you to be better and see the light. Second, I truly feel that your crowd deserves better and should know some basics that you fail in communicating to them. Have you not noticed that your supporters comprise of all types of deviants? People that you otherwise would not agree with either? They have the right to know that you are not being fair or well-mannered at all. While most will ignore the message and cheer you on, some will see you for what you are and take heed.
So you now have manners? His old age prevented you from sharing the truth with the people? Are you kidding me? I know that the views with the filthy ads which precede them help you out. This alone is a sign of insincerity. But can you be so insincere that you compromise the truth due to a man's age?
Bro you are giving away your good deeds speaking ill about a man who returned to His Lord. You are still alive and you will be held accountable for these atrocities you are causing. Your followers, sadly, are a bunch of overzealous haters who are fuming with anger and hostility. You are adding fuel to that fire. You are not exposing anything that has not been done already and all those efforts did not bear any fruits. If you only knew. May Allaah guide you habeebee.
Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari has been notorious in spreading the Pseudo-Salafi methodology and attacking those who oppose it.
This video will focus on his recent videos, he attacks known Dawah figures aggressively for their positions against Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab. The inconsistencies and hypocrisies will be clear for all to see.
#brohajji
#salafi
#speakerscorner
@Mosaab Again
“How dare you criticize their holy rulers of Saudi Arabia? You are misguided.”
😂😂
This man "Mussab the nobody " seriously has no integrity. Absolute joke of a representation for brotherhood and unity
@Mosaab Again What??? 😂😂😂
Do you brother Hajji follow the way of deoband ?
No - Hanafi Athari
4:49
Absolutely repulsive.
This man casually speaks about Ibn Abdul Wahhab like he’s some prophet sent to the misguided Muslims and then he goes about his day like nothing happened. 🥴
So far, I've observed Shamsi, Dawan Man, ARH, Abu Usamah ad Dhahabi, Jalal AbualRub, Assim al Hakeem, and Mufti Muneer in regards to their commentary of MIAW. NONE of them answered the questions Brohajji has raised from quoting from these books. None of them picked up the books Brohajji highlighted and tried to comment on them.
To me, this shows that either they are taken aback and don't know how to respond to these narrations which shows the actions of MIAW or they are trying to ignore it and don't want to interpret it lest they come to concede to this reality. So far all they have been doing is brushing it off as to defend MIAW by saying whatever he did was right and all the narratives out there are just trying to portray him as evil. This is somewhat disingenuous.
AbualRub is not only intellectually dishonest but dishonest in general. He has written books about MIAW and continuously prattles what a great man he was, all the while equating those who do Mawlid as no better than Christians (essentially, takfeer of a large amount of people). I expect nothing from him, may Allah guide him and those whom he has misguided.
Yeah, their responses are meh:/
Exactly
“Don’t worry guys, they’re just haters.”
They can't respond and they know if they address the claims their misguided neo-salafi methodology will crumble as MIAW is the founder of their corrupt ideology. So they lie, slander, and insult to uphold their lie and bankrupt ideology. A sad existence this lot has. They should just stop living a lie and acknowldge the truth, for the sake of their own souls. MIAW doesn't own Islam. Islam existed over a thousand years before MIAW
I am actually shocked at how much can certain ideologies be followed. Anyone that has an inch of objectivness on this matter knows that they are full of inconsitencies and problems.
Subhanallah, I can’t believe that I used to admire these people. Jazakallah Khair brother for warning the masses about these kinds of people.
Walk over
So u got sucked in! This guy is part of a cult! Mohammed ibn abdualwahab is a great scholar!
I am from India. This really pains my heart and nothing saddens me than to see two muslims fighting.
May Allah bless us with unity.
He thinks he is the only Muslim. Like his father ibn Abdul Wahhab. Bro Hajji never left the fold of Islam but according to his own testimony he was a Budist a Rapper. I think when you are a Budhist you can't be a Muslim. So how dare you and call a Muslim a Crackhead.
Mustafa Sabri Efendi, the last SheikhulIslam of the Ottoman Empire, tells in his work Mevkif'ul-Akl 👇
[If the state leaves the line of Islam,
"Obeying the dictates of religion is not the business of the government. It is only the business of society." says, this is to separate religion from the state.
In such a case, the state apostatized (abandoned religion). If the society consents to such a government, or if the government will make laws by taking the society's proxy in the parliament (that is, by voting), the society will become apostate just as the government is apostate. In this case, the following verse applies to both that government and that ummah:
"Those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed, they are the disbelievers themselves." (Surah Maida, Verse 44)
A political regime that accepts the principle of secularism means that it has rebelled against the rules of Islam. Therefore, first of all, this government apostatized, and then those who obeyed this administration became apostates one by one. Just as those who take part in the political administration are apostates one by one, the masses obeying this government also fall into apostasy (kufr).] (Mavkif'ul-Akıl, 4/280)
His narcissim is so apparent. His holier than thou is so apparent and obnoxious its embarrassing. If we are not on your manhaj we're automatically deviants?
Yep. That’s exactly why people join Salafiyyah.
People with narcissistic tendencies join Salafiyyah after converting to Islam.
@@Kimeikus exactly why you can never reason with many hard core salafis. narcissists will only change their mind for selfish reasons. like children they need to be enticed with sweets to think differently.
Of course akhi thats what they think thats how they justified their oppression lol crazy people
He’s living a nice comfy life expenses paid by the KSA. Cuz he 👅 their 🥾 real hard. He even perfumizes theirs farts . He isn’t changing his mind anytime soon. Unless maybe if they decide to get rid of him and deems him unimportant.
@@ryancooper3449
Facts. You can only convince the ignorant people among them such as myself.
It only took like three refutation videos or so and I realized their main talking points that they repeat all the time are absolute blunders.
This is academic no need to call him names. Let's keep it civil.
I side with hajji as he brings the proofs and puts them on screen.
A very good refutation against the likes of Akkari, and any other "WahhabiBots". Brother Hajji definitely put in the work. بارك الله فيه وحفظه.
I usually tell people who don't know about the history of Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab and his connection with the Aal Saud, that in a nutshell, Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab was the so-called "brains" of the operation, and the Sauds were his "thug enforcers". The Sauds and their ancestors have always been enemies of the Deen, hence the reason they only kill Muslims. They have never fought against any non-Muslim armies. Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab just gave the Aal Saud's massacre of Muslims an "air of legitimacy". Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab himself, I believe, just had an inferiority complex, stemming perhaps from jealousy and maybe "daddy issues" where he didn't receive enough attention.
والله أعلم
The majority of us laymen don't have a clue because we may not understand arabic. The thing is the vast majority of authentic books are all in arabic hence why we are hidden from it all by these bootlickers. We rely on someones commentary but when you read the raw texts the truth is revealed.
Keep up the solid work brother haji.
These pseudo salafi wahabis are one of the biggest fitnah of modern times
💯
He's not a pseudo salafi you are speaking ignorantly. You only know Abu mussab from bro hajji shaming Abu mussab by calling him "Shrek". What is this
Allah gave you a special skill br hajji so Please use it with hikmah. What you're doing is clarifying concepts and at the same time, mocking the brother, calling him Shrek and what not. Would the prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم advise like that?
Petro dollars and the help of Western imperialism has helped spread Saudi Salafists.
In all fairness though, today they've become the main defenders of 'traditional islam'.
Dont downplay Saudi role in Osama Bin Laden, 9/11 and formation of daesh, all of which have made orthodox Muslims look intolerant and evil. There is schism between real Salafis and their modernised leaders who want a moderate Islam.
My Brother Hajji exposing these takfiri boot lickers.
I love when you say "as you can see on the screen" lol may Allah keep you steadfast and on the haqq.
Ameen ☝️
Ameen
Thank you bro Hajji.
These cult is more dangerous than kufar.
The enemy within is always more dangerous.
You making takfir of them to
what is MIAW? May Allah reward you for this...of your intentions are right, you will be rewarded in shaa Allah
Alhamdulilah
Keep up fighting these khawârijs QabbahahumuLlah fi darain ameen
Brother hajji you are refuting all these speakers, but what are you presenting yourself ?
Why are you bias in your refutation when speakers like YQ, yaqeen Institute and modern orientalists are causing more damage then these guys who are calling towards orthodox Quran and sunnah atleast.
They aren't calling in reformation of islam, doubt in the preservation of Quran nor are they siding with LGBTQ.
This guy is an ex rapper who didn’t make it and become a Salafi priest instead just like Shamsi couldn’t make it as a criminal so he became a Salafi preacher
Salafism is their Plan B
You give him too much credit to call him a ‘rapper’. He wasn’t even a lyricist that contributed to that ‘Scums of the Earth’ hippie buddhist vegan rap group. His friend and brother in law was the rapper and used to bring him along to the studio. He never rapped nor wrote a page of lyrics. He just piggybacked on the group leaders fame to make himself appear bigger then he was.
Same thing with Da’wah Man 😂😅
Ex-Rapper
Damn, you sent for Shamsi 🤣
I just hope he embraces his Algerian Ashari heritage, the scholars of Tlimsan were giants in Islam.
He used to be Buddhist I find Buddhism like nihilistic no disrespect but its like he went from one version of nihilism to another
Do you takfir Abu mussab and shamsi?
What do you say about this book "الاستعاب في تاريخ الدععة السعودية الاولى"
ماشاء اللہ
He deleted this comment under his video, so this shows his insincerity:
“The scholars have said that certainly, the one who is an Imam for an oppressive ruler, no prayer is to be made behind him, except if he reveals his excuse [for his treachery] or repents from it.” [Tafsīr al-Qurtubī, al-Jāmi’ li-Ahkām al-Qur’ān), 10/373] The position of Imam al-Qurtubi is merely for an oppressive ruler (who is muslim). Can you imagine praying behind an imam who calls to disbelief?
Harb Al-Kirmāni (died 280 AH), the disciple of Imam Ahmad said: "With three kinds of people there is no inviolability and (no prohibition of) defamation: 1. The unjust ruler 2. The sinner who openly reveals his sin 3. The follower of innovation (Bid'ah)." [Kitab as Sunnah 656]
Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or is being oppressed.” It was said, “O Messenger of Allah, we help the oppressed, but how do we help an oppressor?” The Prophet said, “By seizing his hand.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2444, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2584 Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim.
Jabir reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The master of martyrs on the Day of Resurrection is Hamzah ibn ‘Abdil Muttalib and a man who stands up to a tyrannical authority, commanding good and forbidding evil and he is killed for it.” Source: al-Majrūḥīn li-Ibn Ḥibbān 1/157 Grade: Sahih according to Al-Albani
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 18449 Grade: Sahih according to Al-Nawawi.
Abu Bakr ra: I have been given the authority over you, and I am not the best of you. If I do well, help me; and if I do wrong, set me right. Sincere regard for truth is loyalty and disregard for truth is treachery. The weak amongst you shall be strong with me until I have secured his rights if God wills, and the strong amongst you shall be weak with me until I have wrested from him the rights of others if God wills. Obey me so long as I obey God and His Messenger. But if I disobey God and His Messenger, you owe me no obedience. Arise for your prayer, God have mercy upon you. (Al-Bidaayah wan-Nihaayah 6:305, 306)
And from Kaab al-Ahbar that he said, 'The community will be good if the governor/commander is good and will be bad if he is bad.' [Hilyatul Awliya 5/367]
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: 'Two camps of my Ummah, if these are good, the (remaining) people are also good, and if they are bad, the (remaining) people are bad too: the rulers and the scholars.' [Narrated by ibn Abdilbarr, Abu Nuaym and al-Gazali]
8/73 And those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one Khalifah - chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be Fitnah (wars, battles, polytheism, etc.) and oppression on earth, and a great mischief and corruption (appearance of polytheism).
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ: “Verily, tyrannical rulers will come after me and whoever affirms their lies and supports their oppression has nothing to do with me and I have nothing to do with him, and he will not drink with me at the fountain in Paradise." {Sunan al-Nasa’i 4207}
There is a diffrerence betwen supporting a ruler and having paintince
@@cards_player When you call Muslims khawarij in support of the ruler, that is not patience and minding ur own business
@@askfaisalmuslim the khariji will be killed so in reality it will make no difference😂😂😂
@@cards_player what
@@askfaisalmuslim the ruler in the end will kill the khariji
Thank you. Great video.
I have some concerns about criticizing the Salafi because now Sufi are using these mistakes to further their innovations
I am a huge follower of Muhammad Yasir Al Hanafi which originally brought me away from Salafiyyah but there are good Salafi like Mufti Muneer and Abu Tamiyyah
I thought Sheikh Jalal Abualrub has published a book regarding Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab
This guy believes Allah swt has 1 foot.
Dawah Man read the Hadith: “Your Lord does not have one eye.” and then he concluded that Allah has 2 eyes 🤣
What is it with these guys and anthropomorphic interpretations? 😭
@@Kimeikus they’re merely affirming what allah and his messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said. The prophet said “Allah is not ONE EYED” he didn’t say Allah has no eyes.
وحملنه على ذات ألواح ودسر
تجري بأعيننا جزاءً لمن كان كفر
@@إلهانبنأحمد
No, Dawah Man literally said Allah has two eyes. And apparently, there are fake Salafis who claim Allah even has two legs. 😂
@@Kimeikus he’s not saying something new, the salaf affirmed it as they did with the two feet of allah since the prophet informed us of it.
@@mughal_r9374 because that’s what the prophet said in an authentic hadith
Bro Haji
I am new to your channel so please forgive me for asking this. Can you do a historical review of all mislim that were killeb by mohamed bin abdulwahab.
It makes me upset when i hear people equating Sheikhul Islam Ibn Taymiya with ibn abdulwahab.
In my humble learned view these two opposing fogures in islam. Ibn Taymiya i think is a towering figure of knowledge but followers of ibn wahab now quote ibn Taymiya then most of us assume these two men held the same view. Ibn abdulwahab has be judged by hos actions in killing so many muslims and his books which probably contain alot of islamic truths. What makes him wrong is the way he applied huduud on many of our predecessors who really didn't deserve it.
I could be wrong so i would be grateful for any corrections etc.
Funny how name calling and straight cursing is something that’s so clapped for in this video , on both sides , RUclips worries on horses , why not debate face to face in a civilised manner both of you. Or for your dignity, sanity and saving others from the fitnah keep quite like the rest.
Bro, tell this to the “Salafis” 😂
They’re the ones who refuse to debate. If there are any barriers between discourse and reconciliation, “Salafis” are the ones who constructed them.
@@Kimeikusbro are we not meant to be salafis lol meaning in the sense of the way of the salaf-saliheen , what proof is there they refused, and it doesn’t help cursing and acting un Islamic and going outright against the advice of the Prophets (SAW) advice on akhlaaq is a solution, leave alone laughing at things even silence could be approval of such behaviour
Barak Allahu fik Hajji anta Rajal masha Allah
Be civil, don't call your brother all those names.
Brother Hajji - can you respond to that 3hr long 1dawah vid?
They keep saying they’ve refuted you + it’s starting to cause some doubts among the brothers.
Apparently their sheikh wrote a book addressing your points.
ruclips.net/p/PLZjQgCP-RJfL4q-7M59sxtUL3XncYqMdz
The Old Shaykh doesn’t do himself any favours with that response tbh. Out of respect for his age, I am not responding because I could embarrass him very easily.
The playlist is sufficient and more videos will be uploaded soon.
@@BroHajji
You are a jahil that you don't know ibn taymiyyah did Not excuse in the foundation of the Deen.
Do your research and then come back to me and say I'm wrong so I can embarrass you and show your followers how ignorant you.
2:26 - 2:27 Bro Hajji has psychological problems?
Just one of the few accusations.....Allahumusta'an!
It’s ironic because many Salafis (including Akkari) appear to suffer from narcissistic personality disorder.
He doesn't deserve to have a channel and you do...unsubscribed
I see bro hajji, i like..simples
QUIT JUDGING YOUR FELLOW MUSLIMS. Why publicly shame the faults of your brother. This not islam. Delete these videos. Yall could have had one phone call and settled it. Youre just using his name for fame. Leave him alone
Even though you rebel sheikh Abdul wahab that he used to eat pork we shall follow him forever
Wth??
Speaking of Qatif, have you read the book "A Cry From Qatif" by a Shiy'iy reformist?
It's the same modus operandi.
It's the books they read! The Salaafi "scholars" are doing to their Salaafi flock the very same thing the Shiy'a "scholars" are doing to their Shiy'a flock.
They are manipulating and distorting the Kalaam of the 'ulamaa and aimma creating boxheads.
I'm a telling you, the root/source of the evil and corruption are in the upper echelon of the Salaafi strata, the Mashuyukh.
The underlings are just brainwashed idiots who regurgitate their programming.
Who are producing and outputing the Salaafiyya's programming syllabus?
I dont understand the rant towards the ens of the video
Does brother abu musaab not want to live under a khilafah?
Don’t mention the c word to neo salafis 😂
Music is Haram according to Muslims and I'm sure you'll be punished
Man how many seasons are there in a year?
it depends on the geographical position
You modernist Muslims oppose Saudi Arabia more than you oppose shirk. Where has your compass of Islam gone? Clearly in the dirt.
Where has he supported shirk? Slandering is a massive sin! There is shirk happening in Saudi Arabia right now. It is your MBS who is the modernist and is praised by people like Jay Smith for slowly destroying Islam. We will call this out, and ignoring this just shows where your moral compass is.
@@abdul-hadidadkhah1459 I never said he supported shirk. Don’t put words in my mouth.
Exactly. These najdis dont mock saudi ruler. They say to ignore the wrongs they do, even if it is against islam and take the good they do.
This is going to be fun!
Your name reminds me of the old stoic people from rome
wait.. they say najd is in Iraq
The horn is from the Saudi Land
Your Incorrect Brother. Allaah will always protect and preserve the Aqeedah and Scholars and not confuse like your doing now ☺️.
Not all scholars, the mistakes of scholars can't and have not been ignored, without doing so there would more confusion. Nobody is perfect.
Who is prophet Muhammad father because he was born 4yrs after the dead of his father who is his real father Muhammad
Hajji mocks dawah man for taking money from the Muslims then he himself is asking the Muslims for money lol SubhanAllah
سلام عليكم ياأخي الحبيب.
انتم امیر المجاھدین
بیض اللّٰہ وجہ
O Kafir! What I hear is you just arguing in a circle. So if Sheikh Abdul Wahhab (rahimehullah) raids the people of Al-Aqsa and steals from them and kills them, it's haram because you assume them to be muslim. But if someone assumes them to be mushrikeen (those people of Al-Aqsa) you resort to shaming them for being "closeted takfiris". It just doesn't make sense, and holds no inherent values. And since you compared the rule of the Ottomans over Al-Aqsa painting them in a way that they are better muslims, or muslims at all shows. No, the Ottomans were not muslims, they were sufis, dervishes, grave worshippers, they ruled by jahiliyyah etc... This leads me to believe that you lack fundamentals of the Islamic faith, like disbelief in the tagut and mushrikeen comes before you can have iman in Allah. So I advise you and the person you are adressing in the video to look into the true meaning of the shahada, the connection between aqeedah and the hokm of Allah, subhanahu wa ta'ala, and He knows best.
Someone jail this guy b4 he harms ppl
@Mosaab twice i feel worried seeing this type of comments. May Allah keep u and me strong to fight this madmens 🤲
Hi isis
Why are you calling him a kafir? Can’t you see you’re the exact type of person we’re warning about? Just because someone does not agree with you you can’t call them a kafir! Astaghfirullah.
@@crysw6281 Takfir is actually of Aslu deen. Although me calling him a kafir might have been unnecessary in my comment, but it definitely isn't incorrect or a sin. In fact one can't establish Islam without the takfir of the disbelievers. I advise you to learn and study the basics of Islam if you fear Allah and the Day of Judgement. Learn proper aqedah and tawheed, but don't learn it from Bro Hajji and his scholars, nor from OneWayToParadise and his scholars, they are from the deviants.