The 62MAS FINALLY gets a Name! (Seiko SJE099)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- HELP Support US ❤️ 1 Coffee: www.ko-fi.com/...
The 62MAS, though affectionately referred to as a nickname, falls short in encapsulating the true essence of Seiko's first and most important dive watch. Consider Rolex and their iconic Submariner - a name that has become synonymous with excellence in the world of diving watches. Seiko's first-ever diver deserves more than a casual moniker and Seiko recognizes the profound impact a name can have in the world of watch marketing.
The MARINEMASTER isn't just a renaming; it's a strategic move that aligns with the brand's commitment to excellence and innovation. Experience the upper regions of Japanese craftsmanship with the Seiko Marinemaster SJE099. This divers watch seamlessly blends precision engineering with a sleek design, featuring a high-beat movement and a sapphire crystal for unparalleled durability. Seiko SJE099, SJE101, SJE097.
Recommended Awesome Divers:
✔️Tudor Pelagos 39mm Homage: s.click.aliexp...
✔️Black Bay 54: s.click.aliexp...
✔️62 MAS Homage: s.click.aliexp...
HELP Support us by shopping on Amazon: amzn.to/3RvARig OR
❤️Join this channel to get access to perks and support the channel:
/ @escapementwatch
Thank you for Watching! If you would like to support the channel visit my Patreon: ✔️ / escapement
✔️Merch Store: www.escapement...
✔️FREE Month of Audible: amzn.to/2VETKo1
🚀 Tools and services I recommend:
○ BERGEON SPRING BAR TOOL: amzn.to/3jw0oXg
○ TIMEGRAPHER: amzn.to/3DcCNCZ
○ Watch Rolls: amzn.to/3xa26lu
○ Watch Screwdriver kit: amzn.to/3lpbzEo
○ SEIKOS: amzn.to/2RaC5z
○ Watch BOX: amzn.to/3A7Tyxg
✔️My fav Seiko 5: amzn.to/3krqZrt
🔔EMAIL: EscapementandWatch@Gmail.com
My AD of Choice: www.KavarJewel...
✅ Instagram: / escapementwatch
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Some of these links go to one of my websites and some are affiliate links where I'll earn a small commission if you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
Music: by CreatorMix.com
Check out the 62MAS Re-Make Video Right here: ruclips.net/video/JAyGEV5SHXw/видео.html
I actually prefer the unsigned crown.
2.900us$ ?? ?? ??? ??? ?/
Seriously ? ? ? ?
Is it made out of gold?
Well executed. Much more affordable than a Rolex Submariner w/date ($10,250). Buy the Seiko, and take a 2-week trip to Mexico, and still have money leftover!
I'm definitely loving the looks of it, and I hope Seiko continues to make use of the 6L movement in various watches. Seiko going thinner is absolutely something I would like to see.
I like it… the 3 things I do not like:
1. the greenish lume
2. the price
3. the clasp
Christmas greetings from germany
Exactly
Merry Christmas 🎄 I've seen a surprising amount of German viewers the last couple months interesting
I'm a huge Seiko fan, but I strongly dislike this release. The world did not need a 62 Marine MASter. It looks like a half hearted Seiko mod.
Great review.
Not for me, I prefer the 62MAS 😂
Pros:
Good thickness and size
Lovely case finishing
6L37 Movement
Aligns???
Cheaper than the 62MAS
Cons:
Bracelet doesn't match the case
Clasp is trash
Bezel is ugly
Unsigned crown (WTF Seiko?)
I love your channel but i dislike the fact that you have to bring down Omega or Rolex just so you can bring up Seiko. Each are different and are in different leagues of their own.
Waves on the seamaster are beautiful and the process is way more expensive to make than what seiko is using.
This looks fantastic and I love the dimensions. However, pressed indices, pathetic bracelet and $2800.00 price tag make this an instant no. Seiko marketing must be based on "there's a sucker born every minute."
What would you get for $2800 instead of this?
A San Martin 62MAS homage + a half decent used car.
Oris Aquis 39.5mm immediately comes to mine. $2300.00 US. @@CamelJockey562
@@marvinarmstrong3372😂
$2800 and hour markers poorly finished? No monocoque back? So-so lume? Not a good buy. Sounds like a watch that would be a good purchase in the $1500 price tier.
When getting into Tudor and Omega money, I would rather own either of these two brands. Seiko trying to move up and join the big boys but without the chops.
Nice $1200 and not worth $2800 watch but the 4:30 little peek-a-boo date window kills the aesthetic.
Would rather have the SPB143 for the money and spend 3 grand for a watch with more cache than a Seiko.
$20 clasp on a $3,000 watch 😂
It's a $800 watch, they are just selling it for $3000. But your comment is still valid for a $800 watch.
@@LukeZakrolecs is also a £ 500 watch but they sell for over £ 10k
So what will the community end up calling this watch? 1.) 62MM 2.) MM200 3.) 62Evo 4.) 62Master ? I think we might have to strip the title from the spb mm200's as maybe it shouldn't have never been called that. The first Seiko MarineMaster was a 100M quartz watch. Now we got a 200M and of course the MM300 everyone knows. The Tunas are the 1000m MM's as well.
I agree MM200. It is more deserving of the name. I agree on the criticism on the clasp and the unsigned crown but I also agree this watch look positively beautiful and I want the black one. I really like the unique bracelet design. I wonder if they will carry it over to the new MM300.
62Evo sounds cool 😅
2024 should be very interesting as Seiko makes its come back.
I got the SPB185 which is the MM200R - I vote 62MM or 62Master. The MM200R wears perfectly on the wrist so I expect the SJE101 to be at least as comfortable - this is the one I'll get once it's available.
No signed crown I no buy!
INSANE price tag
So they have named something "Marinemaster " that isn't actually a Marinemaster. Well done Seiko.
With that logic even the marinemaster 300 isn't a real Marine master because the first Marine master was a 100 m Seiko quartz in the 90s. Let's not pretend we know more about Seiko than Seiko knows about Seiko
Calling a diver a Marine Master but only have a 200 meter depth rating just makes no sense. I don't think this is a master of anything.
@@speedmaster7107 Who dives 200M ?
@@marioaquilina248Exactly. As a sport diver I have a cheap Citizen as my back up but use my dive computer for timing etc. Most casual divers will never go below 25m. So your 5000m Omega is as much use as getting your shopping in an F1 car.
For me 100M are more than enough @@jhuggs8840
I was under the impression that Marinemasters only came in the form of the MM300/600 or Tuna 300/600/1000m. This 62MAS-inspired Marinemaster honestly looks out of place and kinda like an imposter 😂
Actually the first ever Marine master was a 100 m watch that looked nothing like the marinemaster 300. So there's no hard and fast rule for marine Masters that people think.
@@EscapementWatch Please show me a 100m Seiko Marinemaster - key word - PROFESSIONAL. This new "Marinemaster" lineup is one of the most ridiculous Seiko releases in years. These guys in 2024 are charging $3000 for a watch with stated accuracy of -10 to +15 spd. Like you said "I can't believe it" 🤯🤯🤯
@@LukeZaklook for the SBCN005: first Marinemaster (with Marinemaster actually written on the dial), just 100m water resistant, ugly as hell, and quartz. Mate that should be like hell for you
Yeah I don't get it. They worked to purge marinemaster out of their lexicon, then randomly brought it back on an arbitrary watch. I thought a Marinemaster had some consistency to it, like all 300M watches and up, or something with a pattern. I don't get the random decisions.
@@EscapementWatch Yes dude. and the first submariner had measly water resistance by comparison. Stop being a Seiko apologist.
I like it more without the Name on the dail.
Probably when they put it on the bottom half, it would look better.
A porthole date window and it's at 430? That's a huge 1,2 punch from Seiko and not in a good way.
I knew it!
Thanks for making this video and sharing your points of view on this new Seiko diver. It’s no doubt a great looking Seiko diver, but it makes me appreciate my SPB299 Marinemaster 200m Glacier dial and SPB149, the 62MAS LE reissue much more! Luckily, both of mine are running within COSC specs.
wow wow this watch is great
This is a great looking watch. Very modern with so many Seiko call backs. It's a great modern Seiko. I agree very Seiko evolved.
I'm a watch enthusiast and I don't mind date windows, if well implemented. Like if it's at 6 o'clock most of the time I think it looks fine. This one is subtle enough it's not distracting and feels like a bonus feature.
Sorry, the date at 4:30 is a complete turn off to me.
Beautiful! Wearable dimensions, an elegant dial and the crown at 3! The unfinished indices are somewhat disappointing but all in all I love it!!
At that price i expect a quality clasp and better finishing. Those indicies are rough!
Too expensive is what I call it. Seiko needs to show it has confidence in it's movements, you can't charge that money and give basic selitta guarantees and if there is dust on the dial at that price then send it back.
Referring to the bracelet links... You referred to them as "eclipse-shaped". I think you meant to say "ellipse-shaped"
yes correct
It looks beautiful. However, I won't be spending that kind of money on a watch only to have to purchase an aftermarket bracelet to get a proper fit. Wtf with only 2 microadjusts?! C'mon Seiko, enough is enough!
Pity they didn’t ditch the pro-spec logo from the dial and have it etched into the crown instead.
hopeing for that to be a trend in 24
No signed crown : (
Wao!! Great review 👍 keep up the good work and merry Xmas
The bracelet endlink is just lazy. It looks like it was designed for another watch, taken and truncated, then shoehorned between the lugs.
it will always look like that unless they do squared endlinks, which they do not want to do. Because the 62MAS trademark trait has that flat connection between the links.
Looks-wise, it's not for me, but that's subjective. What isn't though is how poorly those end links integrate with the lugs. This bracelet was specifically made for the watch, why doesn't it fit? What were they thinking?
It's because of the 62mas connection of the lugs. So the only way to make it perfect is to make it square and they don't want to do that. so the round and square mixture never really works well. Rolex datejust endinks does not fit in perfect as well it's like a desired look love it or hate it. It has a tucked in look I showed on the most recent datejust review. And part of the Jubilee sticks up above the lug it's a really cool look.
Ehhhh.....no signed crown. Really?
I think Seiko should have made it a no date to keep the dial's symmetry.
Still no micro adjust ratchet clasp !!!
Thanks for the Christmas gift FT! The watch looks great... It's going to be a hit!
Merry Christmas 🎁
@@EscapementWatch what's your Facebook Bro...I'm gonna invite you to our 37K strong Seiko club...
I do not have it. I got off the platform over 2 years ago. But thanks anyways.
Excellent watch! i just wish they kept the marin master indices and made that date window more prominent. would still buy one though
No thanks, for this price I buy a swiss watch!
Not a fan of the overly-aggressive bezel edge. The rest of it is pretty fantastic.
This new movement has me excited for the future of Seiko divers
p.s. Slapping “Marine Master” on dial sullies the TRUE Marinemaster- kinda like the all electric “Mustang.”
The first ever Seiko marinemaster was a 100 m quartz. So even the marinemaster 300 Sully's the name of marinemaster and isn't a true Marine master.
Yeah doesn’t look like a marinemaster imho
@@EscapementWatch Technically you’re correct but each of those two watches has something unique at least: quartz movement specifically manufactured for the quartz version and monocoque case for the automatic (plus world’s best lume AND world class hand and dial finishing)…
awesome marinemaster 200
Fun fact: Spb 185 and Citizen nb 1050 are the only medium price watches in the world with Zaratsu polishing.Citizen cost 550€ with brushing and polishing worth of 5k watch.
I was a bit apprehensive about this at first, but damn they're stunning in the flesh! I'm sold!
When will Seiko realize they don’t need to put the Prospex X on the dial…
Decades probably once they rebrand ProSpeX
Buy a ginault and get a higher quality watch with a far superior bracelet with screws
Always enjoy your reviews. Can't wait to see Seiko's 2024 line up. Merry Christmas!
Happy holidays!
Me too! Merry Christmas!
I love the 4:30 date window!!
I need all indexes and the symmetry!
I've experienced a similar bracelet and the exact same clasp on seikos enough to make them a deal breaker, especially at 2800$, astronomical with such a poor quality bracelet
I love it. Wish I could afford it.
Beautiful watch which looks like it will be great for everyday wear. I believe it also has the Seiko super hard coating. A lot of competition at that price though.
Eu amei, muito lindo e barato.
I need this watch in my life !
I’ve really got a huge block on these watches. I adore Seiko divers and own five of them so this should be right up my alley but …. I think it’s a disaster for the money and a really incoherent design. The design of the hands is the bright spot for me. I appreciate all your videos FT, and I know you give your honest opinions rather than try and sell every watch to us, but this a rare instance where I respectfully disagree with your take.
No problem man we all have different tastes. This one does have its negatives which I made sure to highlight, but despite its negatives it quickly became my favorite Seiko which is really difficult. I'm a big fan of the 62 mas but this just takes it to a completely new level just in my opinion. the overall watch community seems to hate the watch I would say 70% hate it from the reaction I've been getting. Which actually benefits me because I can probably get a bigger discount at kavar Jewelers once the hype dies down 😂 but might wait for a sunray dialed version as the dial is a bit too omega for me and if I really dislike any connection with omega.
Love your work promoting Seiko mate!
Haha thanks that's why Seiko pays me the big bucks!!! Kidding they don't know I exist but I do think they watched my grand Seiko sbgw231 video because they fixed the issue that I brought up lol
Excellent review as usual! Like Rolex, Seiko seems to be moving aways from a tool look to a jewelry look. I prefer an aluminum bezel and a non-textured dial. I also do not care for the 15-30-45 bezel. I've always preferred the Seiko fully graduated 10-20-30-40-50 bezel. This is something different, so I'm sure these will sell - Seiko knows what they re doing.
Agreed. The display case back is also a move away from tool look. I hope for a solid caseback version in the future and maybe a sunray dial next year. Also, a lot of people are saying this is not a real marinemaster when the first ever Seiko Marinemaster was a Qaurtz 100m watch. Sooo as much as customer like to talk and me included, nobody knows more about SEIKO then SEIKO. So I agree they know what they are doing. My best guess is they will do MM teirs. 100m for quarts, 200m for 62mas, 300m for new mm300 and 1000m MM will stay the Tunas.
Seiko are now too expensive,they seem to think they can put a different colour dial and charge more money.
Micro brands do it better.
Great review as always
I actually like them a lot even tho I won’t buy it for myself. I simply see no reason to replace my spb143 but for a marinemaster 300 (big one).
But it’s really good for them to have a modern skindiver in their premium segment which they where lacking.
My Seiko Sports 5 I bought it on March 2024 is really fine but run faster 2 to 5 minutes per day.
Excellent video, absolutely excellent. Thank you.
Nice to see a Marinemaster back. Good looking watch. Cons out weigh the Pros especially at the price point. Good review. Thanks.
I can't believe there are no manual winding watches with a power reserve indicator on this channel.. For sure, something's wrong with watch industry..
Für einen Diver mir zu feminin😊
This watch would look so much better with more simple dials
I don’t care they changed the original case it looks beautiful
2:53 index quality is awful.
"Stuns the World"? Click bait!😲
Hate the date placement.
It’s a hot mess, a couple of good-looking angles but I see no compelling reason to buy this model
“Hot Mess” - 👍😵😵🤡‼️
I think the face striations look like an Aqua Terra , not the Seamaster.
isn't the official name of that watch "Seamaster Aqua Tera" tho?
Not a wave pattern though; more “decking” apparently. That’s why I thought you were referring to the diver
I bought this watch like a week ago. i was checking totally diffrent watches and the seller showed me this and oh boys i like it!
+ The fit is super nice! most comfortable watch that i ever tested!
+ really good looking braclet
Most commented things
- Signed or unsigned crown? Honestly i don't care.
- Open caseback, i love it!
- Date window? really nice atleast for me. I don't so often look the date, but when i need it, it's there! kind of hiding, but still being able to read it clearly.
- 200m water resistant? well ofcourse would be nice to have 300M, but honestly how many people really dive with these watches?
Only real downside was for me that when light is coming certain side angle, dial looses all contrast and it's hard to read.
everything else i like it!
-Bezel first sight i was in love! But know been watching also classical 10-20-30-40-50 bezels, but for this 15-30-45 is super good.
would be nice to see this colors and specs,with SPB299 style indicates and bezel.
Great review!
You are absolutely correct. It should say what it is on the dial for all of their watches.Also the crown should be signed.
The crown should be signed. Right. Because who doesn't need more branding in their lives?
@@justmeeagainn Really dude, I just thought it would add a nice touch .
They ABSOLUTELY bit off the Ginault silent service.
But.... it's a SEIKO! :)))
Im not liking that texture dial. Maybe it suits more a sunburst dial. Thats caseback looks like too fragile for a dive watch.
It is a thick sapphire and ISO diver ready. So do not worry. But agree on the sunray dial, would love to see that in next years model. or this year since its 2024!
Your assertion that only non watch enthusiasts must have the date on a watch is rubbish! All my watches have the date, and I will not buy a watch if it doesn't have the date, and I am not alone. Yes the placement at 4 is different, but what's wrong with that? Who made the rule that it must be at 3? Not everyone is narrow minded. A point of difference is interesting.
Not specifically say watch enthusiast do not want the date. But in general the majority of non watch enthusiasts do want the date. This is info from sales from AD's and Seiko rep. This is why they always favor to put a date on a watch. I asked "why not make more no date versions?" and this is the answers I received.
It’s a beautiful watch, but for the price, I require a much better bracelet and more attention to detail and finishing. The endlinks are especially bad, with absolutely no effort given to make them match up with the contours of the case. The bracelet looks like a pure afterthought-like Seiko just grabbed one from another watch out of the parts bin. Inexcusable.
Yes!!! They put the name!!
That dial is a poor copy if the Aquaterra
Garbage.. seriously. Seiko just lost its direction. They should just stick to making cheap below 500 dollar watches if they are not going to upgrade themselves
Gorgeous
Seiko bracelets are one of the biggest let downs ever
Thanks seiko i hate the date window still 🤡
Nice watch
Sure is
Sorry, why does Rolex decide what a "name" is for another brand? Dumb idea.
They don't decide I never said they do. I just said they know that importance of a name for a fan base and looks like Seiko is following suit by finally naming their golden boy first dinner the 62mas
Does anyone know if this bracelet is compatible with spb143?
I❤❤it
Thanks for taking a look at this one, as I've been waiting to see a good hands on review. I think the dial is cool, and the hands are gorgeous. It's a shame Seiko still can't use applied markers at this price, but I'm also not going to be lookin at it on a macro level. It's not a deal breaker. It's frustrating that Seiko can't spend a few Yen on signing the crown on a Seiko LX model. I would love to get into a discussion with the person or people that made the decision to really only do that on their Presage models. I personally think anything above Seiko Essentials should have one. I think the bezel looks great, but I'd prefer if those edges were brushed. I'm sure it would help the grip a bit too, but it does look great and a bit more high end with the choice they made.
I do actually appreciate the display case back, but it's really just Seiko bending to modern tastes. A smart brand doesn't ignore what customers want though, and that goes for the date as well. While I get the watch fan's desire for a no date model for ease of setting, I actually still appreciate the date. I think I use it more than I think, because when I wear one of my watches without a date, I inevitably get annoyed when I have to dig my phone out of my pocket to look up the date. My now aging eyes (you'll get there eventually haha) would probably struggle with a date that small though. I recall when Monta added a no date option to the Ocean King line. I asked them later about the sales break down, and I recall the no date was only about 30% of sales. I think the no date crowd is just a vocal minority.
I really don't care for the way the end link contrasts so much with the case. I wish they would have gone another route in the design, but I also can't say I have a suggestion on how to fix it. I'd just send them back to the drawing board. The links themselves look fantastic though. Only 2 micro adjusts is a bit frustrating, but I guess they're trying to balance elegance with functionality in this level of watch. I think even just a 3rd slot would be a huge win. I have some watches with 5 micro adjust slots and I just don't use them all, plus it makes for a bulkier clasp. Seiko really just needs to engineer their own quick adjust clasp.
Overall, I think this is a nice release though. I might end up putting it on a nice rubber strap if I pick one up. The fact that these are not limited (unlike the SJE093) is exciting news.
Thanks for sharing. But for the applied indices it's not a cost issue it's a philosophy issue. They think that a Pro Diver should have no fail points on the dial which is a shame. The seiko rep I spoke to told me they stamped the dial if I remember correctly nine times and it's a high failure rate and they throw out a lot of dials it probably cost them more to do the stamp dial. Remember they do applied indices on $70 Seiko 5s
@@EscapementWatch Oh, that's really interesting. Thanks for that info! I never thought of it like that.
It still carries the Prospex logo. Why Seiko, why!?
Like at rolex would be written to the dial smurf starbucks hulk
No they write the real name they write submariner. Marinemaster is not a nickname it's a real name like submariner.
Slippery grip whilst wearing woolly gloves 😂
They're actually grip gloves with rubber on the inside. And when I mentioned the grip I'm talking about it barehanded. Not with my grippy gloves
put them on a Divecore HP strap and ouuuu
That thickness is to die for! 😱
could be better if it was solid caseback!
@EscapementWatch ya, with that 6L37 you gotta rock the display caseback. Perfect for when teaching someone about a watch and movement, they can see how beautiful the 6L37 is , it'll spark something in them, (never know). Even with the display caseback, the thinness is pretty dang great! I do love me some boxy boxed crystals though, so ya, meh 🤷
Is it a Marinemaster or a Prospex? For the sake of dial real estate it should not be both!
That pressed divers extension is a crime against Horology
It's not unattractive...but, this does look like a cash-in on the old Marinemaster name...putting name before prowess. All the Marinemaster's were technical diving watches first...this doesn't even have crown guards. It should come with a unique diver strap, too. Still, at least they gave it drilled lugs...unlike the new Landmaster.
Actually the first ever edit: typo (marinemaster) was a 100 m Seiko quartz watch.
I think you mean the first Marinemaster...SBCN005. It's just a bit disappointing, because the name was used to represent their Professional line of divers...the saturation divers.
yeah mm sorry i typed it out so many times for instagram comments and here i dunno what happened there. I think seiko just wants their main diver their first diver to finally have a name. Like rolex submariner. I hope they just keep it forever on the 62mas diver of the times.
I liked those big knucle-busting MarineMasters, either quatrz or self winding, but they SAID MareineMaster on them above the 6.!!!! Now available used only. Why does not Seiko bring those back? The black dial Seiko Turtle I have on my wrist cost $295 on a rubber strap in Dec. 2016. Had a new movememt put in June, 2023 for Total of $175. Runs great, looks great. Got to losing 10 min in 3 days. The 4R36 is still very available, so I had a new one put in. Cheap. He could not regulate the one that was acting up. Now the Turtle s around $350, so for half the price I had my mint Turtle get a new movement.
Seiko has lost it here. Give me the 033 quartz with the shiny case. ~$1100 used on eBay. Love that watch that says MarineMaster on it. Quartz. Absolute icon!!!!!!! They need to re-assign some people at Seiko for this mistake. Like he says, Rolex didn't drop "Submariner" from their dial. Can you imagine if you tried to convince Rolex to do that?? Bring back the Marinemaster and you'll sell plenty, Seiko.