Cool, in croatian the word is pakao, peklo would be a past tense of the word peći, which means sensation of burning, heat on your skin, or to bake or fry in a pan. But yeah, peklo - pakao, makes sense.
C'on let's be fair here. Russia's new stealth fighter has excellent stealth capabilities. Nobody has seen one of those anywhere near Ukraine. 100% stealth.
Hitting a transloading facility could be highly significant. If the oil stops moving through the pipeline in winter, the fuel could freeze and cause the pipes to burst all the way back to the wellhead. In Russia's permafrost regions, this would require redrilling the wells, which could take years-especially without access to Western oil companies with the expertise to handle it. More of this, please!!
It doesn’t need to be super accurate as its purpose is to ensure Russia knows there’s nowhere safe to permanently park any type of asset. Its reported range is 700km + top speed 700kph.
Can explain how it's find it's target? If it drone it should mean remotely operated but what they use for signal transmission? And what is carrying payload?
@@iraklimgeladze5223 Warhead is believed to be maximum of 50 kg. No information on guidance, but we know it is not remotely controlled. It is most likely a combination of INS and GNSS.
Good work, Sucho. Highly informative. I'm sure I can speak for all your subscribers in saying we appreciate all you do. [EDIT: Me, as the video ended: "Damn, this guy's a master. He's got it down to a science. I should say something nice."]
Oh, my word! I always knew Ukraine was better than russia, but the gulf between the technical capabilities of the two is very comforting for those who care about democracy.
Ukraine was always the industrial, innovation and design hub of the Soviet Union. And if you've seen Ukrainian coders in the tech world, you know never to mess with them when it comes to thinking up robust solutions.
@@theholyinquisition389 You say that as if Ukraine doesn't already have a large and successful defense industry that has been building military equipment and exporting it around the world for decades (armored vehicles, missiles, small arms, etc). And before then, during the soviet days, Ukraine was a hub for design and manufacturing, just like Ealsante said. Things like ships, aircraft, engines, rockets, tanks, etc were designed and built there. It's not like all that knowledge and manufacturing capacity just disappeared once Ukraine became independent. And then they had 30 years to build upon that knowledge and industrial base, which they clearly have. Probably the main thing holding back Ukraine's capabilities (but not entirely, as we can see), is the destruction of so many factories in the east. Meanwhile, Russia's industrial capacity is greatly diminished from the Soviet days (a bunch of that soviet stuff is Ukrainian now, for example lol), it's heavily relying on old cold war equipment stocks that are now severely depleted, and also has to deal with tons of sanctions, and Ukraine destroying some of it's industrial/military sites as well, so it's not like the situation is perfect for Russia either, when it comes to the quality and quantity of their equipment.
@@theholyinquisition389 you make a good point. What do you think would be the Russian equivalent to compare it too? At first I was thinking a full out cruise missile, or would something like the jet varient of the shahed (even though it's Iranian) be closer?
@@dr.williams5251 no, the 400 is their largest last I checked. Almost any of their smaller engines can be "industrialized". Interestingly I don't see that engine on their website anymore. They've been pretty sneaky about some stuff ever since the conflict started. There was a behind these scenes video of the new factory they opened where they show certain parts of the factory but just blurred, you could totally tell it was for these military engines.
Ukraine's ability to design, develop and manufacture new missiles is stunning. Even if they are receiving assistance from elsewhere their capability is admirable.
They were the ones who engineered & built Russia space rocket engines & combat helicopters it's why Russia can only make a few dozen a yr of these. Not 1 in 1000 Russians are capable of sweeping the factory floor of a hi tech assembly line w / o messing everything up
Also, Russia has moved air defences to “better” protect what oil facilities are left- which is why there haven’t been too many strikes against them for some time; considering this, a 60% hit rate is not too bad at all.
@@hgv1883 no it clearly succeeded, its obviously just debris that hit the ground... at least thats what they will say lol. (also, what air defence? you mean to tell me russia knows what air defence is?)
@@selectionnThey clearly have a concept of it. Why else would they have rocket launchers pointing directly upwards? (I'm referring to that point of time during the war when russians launched anti-air missiles against ground targets... on purpose.)
6/10 is pretty good for a brand new weapon system made on a shoestring budget with off-the-shelf components. I’m not sure we should chalk up the losses to air defense. It could be they failed in other ways.
Admiration and respect for your daily efforts to scour news sources for war information....found your channel early on and subscribed. Good luck with your books.
RC jet engines are very powerful and some of them even have technologies which normal engines don't have yet. For example the Jetcat 400 has an integrated starter generator, VERY advanced tech.
Full scale turbine engines have had starter generators for decades, long before RC turbines ever had them, that's a very recent development. Any small business jet that doesn't have an APU relies in starter generators. I fly both RC and real planes. The tech trickles down, not up.
I tend to agree, drones are operator guided to their targets, this looks more like a launch and forget system, admittedly not a very sophisticated cruise missile but low cost and adequate for its intended targets. _Disclaimer; just surmising, ain't no boffin._
As Sucho points out, even if they don't strike their targets, eating up Russian air defense missiles makes them worth the investment. Cruise missiles are only tricky to intercept when their routes are carefully planned to use terrain masking at low level and exploit gaps in radar coverage. The footage you see of Tomahawks in the Gulf War flying down roads and between buildings is because these are typically shadow zones for radar, and spurious moving targets along roads or rail lines might be dismissed by a stressed radar operator as mere traffic. As Ukraine learns more about it's performance and upgrades their onboard navigation systems I'd expect these to become more and more capable. If they can launch many of them at the same time and get some time-on-target attacks going, Russia will struggle to intercept them.
Ukrainian capabilities continue to impress. Excellent proof run with their new Peklo Cruise Missile system. I can certainly sense the desperation in Russia hoping for a ceasefire, and the time to regroup, or reconstitute is military. That however is going to be tough with dwindling funds. Great report here Suchomimus. Thanks for your work. 🇺🇲🇺🇦 Glory to God, Victory for Ukraine, Rise Free Nations!
It looks like an updated version of the WW II, V1 ! Don"cha just love Ukrainian Adaptability and Innovativeness ! Slava Ukraini ! Stay ahead of the field ! Stu xx
@@cideltacommand7169 Yes, Russia excels at using tanks to intercept Javelin missiles and drones, using oil platforms to intercept drone ships and now they are bringing down cruise missiles with oil facilities.
@@VajrahahaShunyata The soviets were the ones who made Ukraine into something more than bigger Moldova. Honestly it's good to have respect for the people who carried you all the way there. I bet you also got a house and a nice car for free from your parents.
@@coast2coast00V1 had a massive payload. Fuel could always be exchanged for range in theory. The basic V1 had limited engine durability...mainly related to the fuel valves degrading IIRC. US and Soviet copies changed that bit of engineering. Payload coyld therefor be sacrificed for range in an adaptation of the V1 design.
If appears that the basic structure is intended to serve as a foundation for ground-launch and air-launch capability or as an unpowered glide bomb. Who would have ever dreamed that Jetcat turbines for large scale hobby aircraft would be repurposed to become powerplants for weapons of war. Jet conversions of the tiny Columban Cricri aircraft proved the practical utility of the small turbines beyond sending RC scale models around a circuit. The Cricri's twin turbines which amazingly haul a human pilot, are sensibly operated at less than full power so their limited TBO of 25 hours can be achieved. On the other hand, in driving a missile on a one-way journey, the longevity of the turbine is no longer a consideration beyond lasting the time taken to reach the target. Nothing drives innovation quite like the exigencies of war it seems.
@@Antropoids It's more like an early Cold War type design with a modern type of jet, the pulse-jet's main advantages are that it runs on awful gasoline and has very few moving parts. The Ukraine is nowhere near as desperate as WWII Germany nor is there industry as harried. The allies could blot out the sun with bombers to target industry and break the will of the population; Russia can only manage to cause the occasional blackout and kill as many people as a bad day of traffic accidents, stupid shit that just makes people angry with them, and they wonder why they're not winning.
Trump should build a great big wall, the greatest wall that no one has ever seen before around Russia and make the Russians pay for it.....................
We really are going back in time, WWI trench fighting, Ukraine develops a modernized V1, this is honestly... Absolutely amazing, always loved that design, it's so cool 😭
You're right Sucho, these new Peklo 'gifts' do show visible rivets but they are only intended to make ONE TRIP! Unlike the new 'Stealth fighter' russia is featuring - - which someday - will be introduced as their best and latest tech! I'm betting on the PEKLO's!! Slava Ukraini!
I believe the new AFU cruise missile "Rhuta" was also involved with the Peklo's targeting 2 different areas of the storage facility and BDA will determine the accuracy of both.
It looks like there are covers on a bay for fold-out wings and on the flat top possibly for attachment points, so I think an air launch capability might also be a possible variant, which would probably increase range or trade it for higher payload.
Mounting the engine on the top decreases complexity massively. They also look like they are setup to be launched from aircraft which also simplifies it (look at the shape along the top).
looking ath Bryansk location, this facility might be important for the Kursk area, and complicates Ruzzia's ability to launch counter attacks here which they've been doing (trying) for a long time now... so it might not be as insignificant than it seems....
Numbers on military equipment and even units (company, division, etc.) are meant to confuse the enemy into thinking there are way more of them, or less of them(!), than there really are. So, the number 069 on the drone missile tells you absolutely nothing. There could be 1000, there could also be 20. For instance, we have the 101st Airborne Division, but there are not even close to 101 Airborne Divisions in total. The same is true for the British in WWII, whom had the 6th Airborne Division, implying 6 Airborne Divisions, but in reality they had THREE Airborne Divisions, the 1st, the 6th, and the Indian 44th. Equally, the battalion numbers went all the way up to the 156th Parachute Battalion, while there were only 25 Btt. (17 Parachute & 8 Airlanding). The ONLY number of any value in determining the amounts of anything military, are serial numbers. Those can actually be tracked, to an extend.
Serial numbers are only useful if they are actually serial. If you don’t want the opponent to know your production you just use random numbers and stamp them in the “serial number” slot.
@@benoithudson7235 Serial numbers (that weren't serial numbered) is what the Allies used in WWII to track German armor production. It is infinitely more useful to TRACK serial numbers, than it is to take useless numbers. Obviously you don't just look at how they are numbered serially.. .that's just dumb LOL. Serial Numbers ALWAYS have some value and progression to them, or at the least you can trace them back to production facilities, which gains you even more insight in production quantity. Even just the mere SIZE of the production plant can tell you how many they can produce. This is, for instance, how the Allies in WWII got to know what manufacturing plants were highest value targets, for large scale bombing raids. You should also know that serial numbers are there for a reason! Manufacturing plants use them to be able to track their manufacturing processes, quality control, maintenance, and quantity. Serial numbers MUST have some serialization to them, otherwise they'd become entirely useless for the manufacturer themselves. So, while you are right in that there is SOME "randomization", it is NOT entirely randomized. The randomization is mostly in different BATCHES. They simply can't be entirely random, without losing their primary function. Otherwise, ask the ISW (Institute for the Study of War) how they use serial numbers. I'm sure they'll tell you ;-)
I think they are probably cart launched, with the wheeled cart staying on the ground as the missile gets up to speed. Ukraine seems to favor low cost low tech solutions like that.
The top of the Peklo looks (to me) like it is meant to be launched from an airplane pylon or a top-rail catapult, with the engine being right behind the mounting pylon. No other reason why there also should be cables sticking out on top of it. Slava Ukraini!
Peklo easily outperforms the whole first generation of cruise missiles in range and speed. And it's a jet powered, fixed wing design flying on aerodynamic lift, like every cruise missile. There's nothing on it that doesn't fit the definition of a cruise missile. It is a true cruise missile.
Hi Suchomimus. I watch all your videos, but one mistake here. The SU 57 portrayed in China was NOT the SU 57 but a T-50-4 with is a version of the SU 57 prototype Russia use in air show's. The production version of the SU 57 IS much better than the T-50. Russia's military is really in a poor ridiculous state, but not that poor, that was Western propaganda. Slava Ukraine.
Having the ability to be air-launched does not exclude the possibility to be ground launched. A wise design for Ukraine would be to have both capabilities.
There is one friend Ukraine can always rely on as weapons provider and supporter. One that will always deliver everything it can. That friend is Ukraine itself. You can ultimately trust only your own feet (including prothese ones), and this is where Ukraine is aiming to. The other things Ukraine aimes to were partly covered in this video. Slava Ukraine!
Honestly, I can see these continuing to hit oil facilities. As they're Ukrainian designed and produced, they can be used to hit mixed use, economic and industrial targets, unlike western weapons that are pretty much restricted to purely military targets.
Just have to add on a few chaff dispensers, second one is failing to transmit back the others start to drop off chaff to jam the radars of the missiles, and possibly even include one or two parachute flares as well to get the IR seekers as well.
Assad, congrats with your relocation to moscow, well within the range of UA drones
Assad will be sent back to Syria as part of the agreement for Russia to be allowed back to their base in Tartus.
That's a Suchomimos level comment! 🤍💙 💙💛
Putin will surely shake down Assad for a few billion dollars to collect rent. A landlord from hell.
Why would you want to target an ophthalmologist without a chin?
@@NunyaBizness-z8f because we can see the “Z” on the Chin clearly
"Peklo" == "Hell" in Ukrainian
Cool, in croatian the word is pakao, peklo would be a past tense of the word peći, which means sensation of burning, heat on your skin, or to bake or fry in a pan. But yeah, peklo - pakao, makes sense.
Can confirm
in Czech aswell...not that it mastters :)
"Pokol" in Hungarian, had a guess :D
@@dannyboy-vtc5741 pEklo == Hell, and peklO has the same meaning as in Croatian. Hvala vam for your help to the refugees and to Ukraine.
C'on let's be fair here. Russia's new stealth fighter has excellent stealth capabilities. Nobody has seen one of those anywhere near Ukraine. 100% stealth.
Of course, they paint it in purple!
Lol
😂😂😂😂👌👌👌👌🥳🥳🥳🥳🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@чиабатта-р9с That sounds a bit Douglas Adams.
one foot but still in the fight...respect from jamaica
yeah
🇯🇲🇯🇲🙌👍
🙌
Fellow jamaican here too. One love.
😂😂😂I smell barbeque
Hitting a transloading facility could be highly significant. If the oil stops moving through the pipeline in winter, the fuel could freeze and cause the pipes to burst all the way back to the wellhead. In Russia's permafrost regions, this would require redrilling the wells, which could take years-especially without access to Western oil companies with the expertise to handle it.
More of this, please!!
It doesn’t need to be super accurate as its purpose is to ensure Russia knows there’s nowhere safe to permanently park any type of asset. Its reported range is 700km + top speed 700kph.
It needs to be accurate, though. And I believe it is accurate.
Because using inaccurate weapons (like russia sometimes does) is an act of terrorism.
That is proper cruise missile spec at this point.
The main thing about these missiles is that they are cheap, easy to produce and can be scaled up into larger versions with a larger payload.
Can explain how it's find it's target? If it drone it should mean remotely operated but what they use for signal transmission?
And what is carrying payload?
@@iraklimgeladze5223 Warhead is believed to be maximum of 50 kg. No information on guidance, but we know it is not remotely controlled. It is most likely a combination of INS and GNSS.
Good work, Sucho. Highly informative.
I'm sure I can speak for all your subscribers in saying we appreciate all you do.
[EDIT: Me, as the video ended: "Damn, this guy's a master. He's got it down to a science. I should say something nice."]
cheers, very kind of you to say
@suchomimus9921 thank you for your work 👍
Oh, my word! I always knew Ukraine was better than russia, but the gulf between the technical capabilities of the two is very comforting for those who care about democracy.
Ukraine was always the industrial, innovation and design hub of the Soviet Union. And if you've seen Ukrainian coders in the tech world, you know never to mess with them when it comes to thinking up robust solutions.
Ukraine is capable of impressive technical feats, but don't delude yourself. Ukraines homemade weapons are not superior to Russias.
@@theholyinquisition389 You say that as if Ukraine doesn't already have a large and successful defense industry that has been building military equipment and exporting it around the world for decades (armored vehicles, missiles, small arms, etc). And before then, during the soviet days, Ukraine was a hub for design and manufacturing, just like Ealsante said. Things like ships, aircraft, engines, rockets, tanks, etc were designed and built there. It's not like all that knowledge and manufacturing capacity just disappeared once Ukraine became independent. And then they had 30 years to build upon that knowledge and industrial base, which they clearly have. Probably the main thing holding back Ukraine's capabilities (but not entirely, as we can see), is the destruction of so many factories in the east.
Meanwhile, Russia's industrial capacity is greatly diminished from the Soviet days (a bunch of that soviet stuff is Ukrainian now, for example lol), it's heavily relying on old cold war equipment stocks that are now severely depleted, and also has to deal with tons of sanctions, and Ukraine destroying some of it's industrial/military sites as well, so it's not like the situation is perfect for Russia either, when it comes to the quality and quantity of their equipment.
@@theholyinquisition389
@@theholyinquisition389 you make a good point. What do you think would be the Russian equivalent to compare it too? At first I was thinking a full out cruise missile, or would something like the jet varient of the shahed (even though it's Iranian) be closer?
Thank you, Suchomimus, for this We Give You Hell episode. Thank you for the fundraiser for Pasha.
🇺🇦 Перемоги та миру всім українцям! 🇺🇦
Cheers Sucho! 💛 🇦🇺 💙
I expect those engines are commercially available gas turbines produced for r/c model planes.
My thought excactly.
You can find them on gliders, which can weigh around 750 kg.
I'm 99% sure they're jetcat engines. I fly RC turbines and it's funny to see a lot of these slapped into drones on both sides
🇺🇦 The Palianytsia drone uses JetCat's smallest industrial engine, the P400. No where to go but up.🇺🇦
@@dr.williams5251 no, the 400 is their largest last I checked. Almost any of their smaller engines can be "industrialized". Interestingly I don't see that engine on their website anymore. They've been pretty sneaky about some stuff ever since the conflict started. There was a behind these scenes video of the new factory they opened where they show certain parts of the factory but just blurred, you could totally tell it was for these military engines.
Ukraine's ability to design, develop and manufacture new missiles is stunning. Even if they are receiving assistance from elsewhere their capability is admirable.
But not surprising, Ukraine was the scientific center of the USSR, they are responsible for the soviet space program success and nuclear program.
@@olafsigursons The "brains of the USSR"
They were the ones who engineered & built Russia space rocket engines & combat helicopters it's why Russia can only make a few dozen a yr of these. Not 1 in 1000 Russians are capable of sweeping the factory floor of a hi tech assembly line w / o messing everything up
They have to be able to defend themselves, so this is one of the responsibilities of sovereign nationhood.
@@TheInfamousMrFox Correction: "Former USSR"
Also, Russia has moved air defences to “better” protect what oil facilities are left- which is why there haven’t been too many strikes against them for some time; considering this, a 60% hit rate is not too bad at all.
The air defense failed at this site
@@hgv1883 no it clearly succeeded, its obviously just debris that hit the ground... at least thats what they will say lol.
(also, what air defence? you mean to tell me russia knows what air defence is?)
@@selectionnThey clearly have a concept of it. Why else would they have rocket launchers pointing directly upwards?
(I'm referring to that point of time during the war when russians launched anti-air missiles against ground targets... on purpose.)
Yet another interesting development. Thanks Mr Sucho.
6/10 is pretty good for a brand new weapon system made on a shoestring budget with off-the-shelf components.
I’m not sure we should chalk up the losses to air defense. It could be they failed in other ways.
Ukraine Protects the West
World Heroes. 💛
Yeah, sure.
Such an example for all of us ❤
Might want to put the Crack pipe down northernnate. West protects Ukraine
@TxChristopher yes!❤👋🫡
“Should’ve named it debris.” Spot on! 😊
If they named it the Russian word for debris, that would make it difficult for the Russians to lie about it to their countrymen LOL
Admiration and respect for your daily efforts to scour news sources for war information....found your channel early on and subscribed.
Good luck with your books.
That's some power concentrated in that small engine.
Yeah I'm suprised by the size of the engine...
It looks like a hoody grade gas turbine engine. They have a surprising amount of thrust.
@@sjv6598 Going to google that, Thanx 4 that................
RC jet engines are very powerful and some of them even have technologies which normal engines don't have yet. For example the Jetcat 400 has an integrated starter generator, VERY advanced tech.
Full scale turbine engines have had starter generators for decades, long before RC turbines ever had them, that's a very recent development. Any small business jet that doesn't have an APU relies in starter generators. I fly both RC and real planes. The tech trickles down, not up.
Yes please call it a cruise missile, it's jet powered low flying and should be classified as such.
yeah, I am not sure what seperates this from a low-cost missile rather than a drone.
@suchomimus9921 I'll check on the definition for both in Jane's.
@@suchomimus9921if autonomous it’s a cruise missile.
I tend to agree, drones are operator guided to their targets, this looks more like a launch and forget system, admittedly not a very sophisticated cruise missile but low cost and adequate for its intended targets. _Disclaimer; just surmising, ain't no boffin._
@@suchomimus9921 a low-flying missile which is guided to its target by an on-board computer. - as per oxford
As Sucho points out, even if they don't strike their targets, eating up Russian air defense missiles makes them worth the investment.
Cruise missiles are only tricky to intercept when their routes are carefully planned to use terrain masking at low level and exploit gaps in radar coverage. The footage you see of Tomahawks in the Gulf War flying down roads and between buildings is because these are typically shadow zones for radar, and spurious moving targets along roads or rail lines might be dismissed by a stressed radar operator as mere traffic.
As Ukraine learns more about it's performance and upgrades their onboard navigation systems I'd expect these to become more and more capable. If they can launch many of them at the same time and get some time-on-target attacks going, Russia will struggle to intercept them.
That distance between Moscow and Ukraine's border just gets a little shorter it seems
Since Germany does not want to deliver long range missiles like storm shadow, Ukraine creates its own.
Scholz is a spineless coward
germany doesnt have storm shadow. Storm shadow is a French/UK system. the germans have taurus which is longer range iirc
The bloke challenging for Chancellor is promising to send Taurus to Ukraine if he's elected.
@@larrybarnes3920that guy is not really trustworthy...i will believe it if i see it.
Well the germans delivered the design for sure, Peklo looks like a copy of the V1 🙂
Hey Such, one of the missiles in the background had the number 080 so they are building them fast. Love your work.
SLAVA UKRAINI!
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
Glory to the Armed Forces of Ukraine .. 🇺🇦
Heroyam Slava!
Hallelulja !!❤❤❤
Ukrainian capabilities continue to impress. Excellent proof run with their new Peklo Cruise Missile system.
I can certainly sense the desperation in Russia hoping for a ceasefire, and the time to regroup, or reconstitute is military.
That however is going to be tough with dwindling funds. Great report here Suchomimus. Thanks for your work.
🇺🇲🇺🇦
Glory to God,
Victory for Ukraine,
Rise Free Nations!
It looks like an updated version of the WW II, V1 !
Don"cha just love Ukrainian Adaptability and Innovativeness !
Slava Ukraini !
Stay ahead of the field !
Stu xx
You mean soviet
@@cideltacommand7169 Yes, Russia excels at using tanks to intercept Javelin missiles and drones, using oil platforms to intercept drone ships and now they are bringing down cruise missiles with oil facilities.
@@cideltacommand7169 nope
@@VajrahahaShunyata The soviets were the ones who made Ukraine into something more than bigger Moldova.
Honestly it's good to have respect for the people who carried you all the way there.
I bet you also got a house and a nice car for free from your parents.
Glorified V1. With modern guidance systems 😁
Simple , cheap and effective.
These are about 1/20 scale V1's.
Engines cost ~$5-10k.
They are a little faster than a V1, and I think they have a longer range.
@@coast2coast00V1 had a massive payload.
Fuel could always be exchanged for range in theory.
The basic V1 had limited engine durability...mainly related to the fuel valves degrading IIRC. US and Soviet copies changed that bit of engineering.
Payload coyld therefor be sacrificed for range in an adaptation of the V1 design.
"Z=(-1)".
Misspelled doodlebug.
I think they are a turbine jet rather than a pulse jet if I understand correctly.
If appears that the basic structure is intended to serve as a foundation for ground-launch and air-launch capability or as an unpowered glide bomb. Who would have ever dreamed that Jetcat turbines for large scale hobby aircraft would be repurposed to become powerplants for weapons of war. Jet conversions of the tiny Columban Cricri aircraft proved the practical utility of the small turbines beyond sending RC scale models around a circuit. The Cricri's twin turbines which amazingly haul a human pilot, are sensibly operated at less than full power so their limited TBO of 25 hours can be achieved. On the other hand, in driving a missile on a one-way journey, the longevity of the turbine is no longer a consideration beyond lasting the time taken to reach the target. Nothing drives innovation quite like the exigencies of war it seems.
Yeah on the 'no need to reach TBO' :) I wonder if they can get them cheaper without a warranty 😂
about air--launch capability - this was indeed my thought, as I saw the top of the missiles. Look pretty much fitting to under-wing rails to me.
Peklo is Ukraines upgraded version of the WW2 "V1 Buzzbomb". It looks almost identical, amazing..
The V1 was much larger, and these little things have almost as much destructive power as the V1 thanks to advancement of explosives
They look like 21st century V-1s.
but its not a pulse-jet
@@Antropoids It's more like an early Cold War type design with a modern type of jet, the pulse-jet's main advantages are that it runs on awful gasoline and has very few moving parts. The Ukraine is nowhere near as desperate as WWII Germany nor is there industry as harried. The allies could blot out the sun with bombers to target industry and break the will of the population; Russia can only manage to cause the occasional blackout and kill as many people as a bad day of traffic accidents, stupid shit that just makes people angry with them, and they wonder why they're not winning.
Good use of RC jet engines.
Except those of us in the RC hobby are now facing a shortage of turbines lol
@@aerialbugsmasher Maybe they become cheaper in the long run through mass production 🙂
@@zapfanzapfan nah. Like everything they only get more expensive so far
@@aerialbugsmasher Have to wait for the sell off of the surplus when peace breaks out I guess.
@@aerialbugsmasher Have to wait for the surplus sale after the war has ended I guess.
They should have named it “Debris”. 😂 Hats off to you again for the sharp wit.
Ukraine just revived the V1 flying bombs.
Yes, it is very similar, only smaller in size.
@@sergeynesterenko3279 And you can't "tip" them with a spitfire
It also looks like they are suitable for attachment to hardpoints so they can be launched from an aircraft.
A shakedown strike.
Trump should build a great big wall, the greatest wall that no one has ever seen before around Russia and make the Russians pay for it.....................
Everyone is saying it.
No one could believe it. @@biddyboy1570
Bigley
The Iron curtain should be re-installed...it worked well in the past.
No travel, no tourism, no yachts, no villas, stay in your 'paradise'....
@@patverum9051 Good point it was better b4............
Slava UKRAINA 🇺🇦🔱
Heroyam Slava!
Putin just like Assad, you are on the way out 😂😂
This is amazing channel, allways i learn something new.
And a really good test for the new missile/drone.
Thanks for the report.
A generic comment made to count toward Channel participation by the algorithm.
Thanks Suchominmus ! Great info as always !!
Thank you, keep working.
Thanks for the update
I suspect trains carrying fuel to the frontline are filled here making it an important target for slowing Russia's offensive in the Kursk oblast.
Thank you, great work, take care.
1st before the sexy bots
none appeared on this video!
😂🎉👍
And still every bit as annoying
Slava Ukraine.
Tks.
Cda.
Yk they determined when they start being self-reliant & adapting
Ukraine’s evoluting👏
We really are going back in time, WWI trench fighting, Ukraine develops a modernized V1, this is honestly... Absolutely amazing, always loved that design, it's so cool 😭
Thanks Jack and Muffin 🥕💛💙✌🌻
You're right Sucho, these new Peklo 'gifts' do show visible rivets but they are only intended to make ONE TRIP! Unlike the new 'Stealth fighter' russia is featuring - - which someday - will be introduced as their best and latest tech! I'm betting on the PEKLO's!!
Slava Ukraini!
Great channel. Keep up the good work
These chaps remind me of the v1 from ww2
They lit up the skies.
I’m calling 100% success rate.
Thanks
I believe the new AFU cruise missile "Rhuta" was also involved with the Peklo's targeting 2 different areas of the storage facility and BDA will determine the accuracy of both.
Babovna ☄️💥🔥
It looks like there are covers on a bay for fold-out wings and on the flat top possibly for attachment points, so I think an air launch capability might also be a possible variant, which would probably increase range or trade it for higher payload.
That "69" had to have been deliberate.
hi here is a like and a comment thanks for the show
They can't call all their weapons "debris" mate.. just because the russians do.😂
Such - FYI. A new UKR drone is the 'Ruta', which Zelensky mentioned recently. Its range and payload were not described.
Mounting the engine on the top decreases complexity massively. They also look like they are setup to be launched from aircraft which also simplifies it (look at the shape along the top).
How interesting to see that the most north eastern part of Ukraine is around 600 km to Moscow.
That’s a really good design.
looking ath Bryansk location, this facility might be important for the Kursk area, and complicates Ruzzia's ability to launch counter attacks here which they've been doing (trying) for a long time now... so it might not be as insignificant than it seems....
Numbers on military equipment and even units (company, division, etc.) are meant to confuse the enemy into thinking there are way more of them, or less of them(!), than there really are.
So, the number 069 on the drone missile tells you absolutely nothing. There could be 1000, there could also be 20.
For instance, we have the 101st Airborne Division, but there are not even close to 101 Airborne Divisions in total.
The same is true for the British in WWII, whom had the 6th Airborne Division, implying 6 Airborne Divisions, but in reality they had THREE Airborne Divisions, the 1st, the 6th, and the Indian 44th. Equally, the battalion numbers went all the way up to the 156th Parachute Battalion, while there were only 25 Btt. (17 Parachute & 8 Airlanding).
The ONLY number of any value in determining the amounts of anything military, are serial numbers. Those can actually be tracked, to an extend.
Serial numbers are only useful if they are actually serial. If you don’t want the opponent to know your production you just use random numbers and stamp them in the “serial number” slot.
@@benoithudson7235 Serial numbers (that weren't serial numbered) is what the Allies used in WWII to track German armor production. It is infinitely more useful to TRACK serial numbers, than it is to take useless numbers. Obviously you don't just look at how they are numbered serially.. .that's just dumb LOL.
Serial Numbers ALWAYS have some value and progression to them, or at the least you can trace them back to production facilities, which gains you even more insight in production quantity. Even just the mere SIZE of the production plant can tell you how many they can produce. This is, for instance, how the Allies in WWII got to know what manufacturing plants were highest value targets, for large scale bombing raids.
You should also know that serial numbers are there for a reason! Manufacturing plants use them to be able to track their manufacturing processes, quality control, maintenance, and quantity. Serial numbers MUST have some serialization to them, otherwise they'd become entirely useless for the manufacturer themselves. So, while you are right in that there is SOME "randomization", it is NOT entirely randomized. The randomization is mostly in different BATCHES. They simply can't be entirely random, without losing their primary function.
Otherwise, ask the ISW (Institute for the Study of War) how they use serial numbers. I'm sure they'll tell you ;-)
Thank you for the update.
The drone ib the photo is upside down.
That one is numbered 690.
Thank Suchomimus 🙏👏
🇺🇦 thx Dino Dude, nice ! 🇺🇦 The pace of Ukraine's rocket and missile development may yet give us a weapon named Debris.
I think they are probably cart launched, with the wheeled cart staying on the ground as the missile gets up to speed. Ukraine seems to favor low cost low tech solutions like that.
The top of the Peklo looks (to me) like it is meant to be launched from an airplane pylon or a top-rail catapult, with the engine being right behind the mounting pylon. No other reason why there also should be cables sticking out on top of it.
Slava Ukraini!
You don't get it - they are FILLED with debris because it's worse than tungsten balls
Peklo easily outperforms the whole first generation of cruise missiles in range and speed. And it's a jet powered, fixed wing design flying on aerodynamic lift, like every cruise missile. There's nothing on it that doesn't fit the definition of a cruise missile. It is a true cruise missile.
Thank you, captain obvious
Hi Suchomimus. I watch all your videos, but one mistake here. The SU 57 portrayed in China was NOT the SU 57 but a T-50-4 with is a version of the SU 57 prototype Russia use in air show's. The production version of the SU 57 IS much better than the T-50. Russia's military is really in a poor ridiculous state, but not that poor, that was Western propaganda. Slava Ukraine.
Peklo is obviously an air-launched cruise missile, the attachment points on its top are clearly visible.
Having the ability to be air-launched does not exclude the possibility to be ground launched. A wise design for Ukraine would be to have both capabilities.
*WAKEY WAKEY*
HANDS OFF SNAKEY !
The engine is a radio control power plant
Biggest issue i see with the design is that having the motor externally mounted like this, does little to mask its thermal signature from IR missiles.
These things are so cool. Little turbine jet engines and crazy amounts of range.
Looks like a modern day Doodlebug.
yes, it is very similar in appearance
They should have started those unit numbers at 300 to imply to Russia that they already had built hundreds and hundred.
PEKLO 👹👌 Hell 🔥
There is one friend Ukraine can always rely on as weapons provider and supporter. One that will always deliver everything it can. That friend is Ukraine itself. You can ultimately trust only your own feet (including prothese ones), and this is where Ukraine is aiming to. The other things Ukraine aimes to were partly covered in this video.
Slava Ukraine!
U take care. thanks
Those engines look like those you’d be able to buy off the shelf from a radio control airplane shop.
Honestly, I can see these continuing to hit oil facilities. As they're Ukrainian designed and produced, they can be used to hit mixed use, economic and industrial targets, unlike western weapons that are pretty much restricted to purely military targets.
Just have to add on a few chaff dispensers, second one is failing to transmit back the others start to drop off chaff to jam the radars of the missiles, and possibly even include one or two parachute flares as well to get the IR seekers as well.
"Jam"
Honestly stop spewing nonsense you heard online
@cideltacommand7169 how is it nonsense?
@@nicolasolton that is not a good idea on a missile ?
0:28 I wondered why Scewfix were out of plastic saw horses 😂
The all-new "Peklo Debris"
Ukraine war is just a modern weapons test.
swarming missiles coming up. 🙂 Слава Україна 🇺🇦 з 🇦🇺
If that is a pumping station and with russia not able to get spare pumps due to sanctions, well that's one pipeline not moving oil.
They seem to have those real R/C jet turbines on those