I've been watching your lessons for quite a long time now and I started with your derivative lectures when I was in 10th grade. Because of you, I was able to learn those. And now I'm back at it, learning statistics from you this time and I have to say that you never failed to impress me! I understand it now and it's all because of you, sir! God bless you!
Man, these videos are amazing! I looked down the comments and almost everyone, like 99% of people (just being facetious, don't actually do the math:) are thanking you for saving them. Well, I'm doing the same, because you saved my ass. I'm taking a sociological stats class, and I asked the instructor if it would help me any to look on RUclips for some help. She told me "No, they may not teach it the same way I do, and it'll probably just confuse you more." I think she's just intimidated by the fact that you've taught me more in 30 min (Z-scores and this one) than she was able to do in the last 3 weeks! (Maybe for job security or something). IDK how you do it, but you're great at what you do! It is 2:30 in the am, and I finally figured out how to do this. Thanks a ton. I may actually be able to get some sleep tonight! If you ever come to Indy and teach at IUPUI, I'll be sure to take you're class! Thanks again. -B
As a statistics instructor, I think that it should be noted that this video promotes a situation that should be corrected.... notice the note from a math textbook... you NEVER "accept" the null, you either reject, or fail to reject ... not sure how the "real world" feels about using "accept" but in a college math class, saying "accept null" gets marked as incorrect... "You should note that you cannot accept the null hypothesis, we can only reject the null or fail to reject it. A statistically significant result cannot prove that a research hypothesis is correct (as this implies 100% certainty)."
This is my 1st time taking stats for college and let me tell you...YOU ARE A LIFE SAVER!!!! My class is asynchronous but my teacher leaves short vids on whatever topic we are doing but I have found them to not be as informative. Your videos actually break it down to the simplest terms that I can understand. I have a stats exam next week and I feel much better on actually taking it and maybe passing this time. Thank you so much!!!
it is much easier to follow your videos than trying to understand my professor's note ... I'm struggling with my homework and this is definitely saving me ... I'm definitely a face 2 face student and not an online learner. Thanks.
Great video. Helped me a lot for my assignment. Unfortunately, textbook contains lot of confusing information. Your explanation is laconic and simple. Thanks again!
You saved me from hours of trying to interpret solutions from a book. Huge help, made it very easy to follow and I now have a full understanding. Keep it up bro, respect.
@Manuel Sojan, you're right sir. It can't be said that "the null is accepted". Only it can be said that "there is no evidence to reject null hypothesis" or "rejection of null hypothesis is failed". Believe me, even some PhD. level statisticians do this mistake!
Hey, is homework stressing you up? Having trouble balancing classes with work/life? Send me an email an I will help you out in essays, statistical units(regression analysis, test statistic, hypothesis testing Qmb 2100,3200) ,kristenchantelle@gmail.com Safe, timely and quality assignments is guaranteed.
Thanks Math Meeting... I always go here whenever i have difficulties with my statistics class... Your explanation is much comprehensive than the others. .:)
actually, since the null and alternative hypotheses are opposites of each other, the null hypothesis HAS to be written in this particular problem as greater than or equal to. this is to range over all possible outcomes.
How is the null hypothesis always an equals sign? We were taught that you only use "equals" and "not equal" when dealing with a two tailed test. Anytime we work with a one-tailed test we use "less than or equal to" and "greater than" or vice versa.
I've been watching your lessons for quite a long time now and I started with your derivative lectures when I was in 10th grade. Because of you, I was able to learn those. And now I'm back at it, learning statistics from you this time and I have to say that you never failed to impress me! I understand it now and it's all because of you, sir! God bless you!
Man, these videos are amazing! I looked down the comments and almost everyone, like 99% of people (just being facetious, don't actually do the math:) are thanking you for saving them. Well, I'm doing the same, because you saved my ass. I'm taking a sociological stats class, and I asked the instructor if it would help me any to look on RUclips for some help. She told me "No, they may not teach it the same way I do, and it'll probably just confuse you more." I think she's just intimidated by the fact that you've taught me more in 30 min (Z-scores and this one) than she was able to do in the last 3 weeks! (Maybe for job security or something). IDK how you do it, but you're great at what you do! It is 2:30 in the am, and I finally figured out how to do this. Thanks a ton. I may actually be able to get some sleep tonight! If you ever come to Indy and teach at IUPUI, I'll be sure to take you're class! Thanks again.
-B
As a statistics instructor, I think that it should be noted that this video promotes a situation that should be corrected.... notice the note from a math textbook... you NEVER "accept" the null, you either reject, or fail to reject ... not sure how the "real world" feels about using "accept" but in a college math class, saying "accept null" gets marked as incorrect...
"You should note that you cannot accept the null hypothesis, we can only reject the null or fail to reject it. A statistically significant result cannot prove that a research hypothesis is correct (as this implies 100% certainty)."
Thanks for that clarification; I was wondering about that.
FINALLY I found the right video to teach me stats.
Great and easy to understand, THANK YOU! What an awesome instructor 💝
This is my 1st time taking stats for college and let me tell you...YOU ARE A LIFE SAVER!!!! My class is asynchronous but my teacher leaves short vids on whatever topic we are doing but I have found them to not be as informative. Your videos actually break it down to the simplest terms that I can understand. I have a stats exam next week and I feel much better on actually taking it and maybe passing this time. Thank you so much!!!
it is much easier to follow your videos than trying to understand my professor's note ... I'm struggling with my homework and this is definitely saving me ... I'm definitely a face 2 face student and not an online learner. Thanks.
Great video. Helped me a lot for my assignment. Unfortunately, textbook contains lot of confusing information. Your explanation is laconic and simple. Thanks again!
My confidence has been restored...I'mma dominate the rest of this math semester. Thanks man! Couldn't figure this out for the life of me!
You saved me from hours of trying to interpret solutions from a book. Huge help, made it very easy to follow and I now have a full understanding. Keep it up bro, respect.
you are a gift from God omg I forgot how much RUclips is better than my professors
Seriously you and Khan Academy have saved me. Earned a sub and please come replace my professor.
Shawn T and replace mine too!
Same here
+1🤦♂️i have an exam tomorrow and i know nothing 😁بس الراجل ده شرحه جميل جدا👌
Shawn T mine too!
thank god I found this video at ryt time n thank you for the video it was verrrry helpful:-)and ur explaination is very very clear
Glad I could help Jacintha!
awesome , no where else I saw this clear explanation...thank you
The best basic hypothesis testing video found. So clear
thank you so much sir.you have made it sound logical! God Bless!
i thought you can't "accept" the null, only fail to reject
@Manuel Sojan, you're right sir. It can't be said that "the null is accepted". Only it can be said that "there is no evidence to reject null hypothesis" or "rejection of null hypothesis is failed". Believe me, even some PhD. level statisticians do this mistake!
Literally it's not correct but "accepting" H° doesn't mean it's true.
Thank you very much i have today understood this statistics more than ever before!
You said "Thank you so much for watching". WRONG.
"Thank you so much for sharing!"
Thank you so very much. Omg. You of all youtubers was the one that saved me.
seriously you are a life saver. You even the best compared to my university lecturer
Wow I pay hundreds of dollars for my biostats prof to teach me and yet this RUclips video taught me more than my prof has all semester
I was so frustrated with chapter 8 as I am taking and learning statistics online. This just saved my butt…lol….thanks so much!!!
you are the best thank you very much. I have three exams tomorrow. This really saves my time and helped me review it
Thank you for making This so much easier to understand. I am hopeful to pass my final exam with flying colors!! You truly have a gift of teaching.
Hey, is homework stressing you up? Having trouble balancing classes with work/life? Send me an email an I will help you out in essays, statistical units(regression analysis, test statistic, hypothesis testing Qmb 2100,3200) ,kristenchantelle@gmail.com
Safe, timely and quality assignments is guaranteed.
This is so helpful! Exam tomorrow and my lecturer and lecture notes have been useless 🙃 thank you
Thanks Math Meeting... I always go here whenever i have difficulties with my statistics class... Your explanation is much comprehensive than the others. .:)
Kathleen Cortez are u student of statics?
Kathleen Cortez does u help to improve my English?
This is very good.It has really given me much understanding.May God bless you
actually, since the null and alternative hypotheses are opposites of each other, the null hypothesis HAS to be written in this particular problem as greater than or equal to. this is to range over all possible outcomes.
You sir explained this simple analysis much better than my signal analysis prof... Thank you!
THANK YOU SOMUCH
Fantastic videos Professor, you are really a great presenter
please dp make more similar like this for research purposes, love from India
Really a great video and it's very clear and it's understandable for me.... Finally found a right channel for me to study stat.... Tq so much 👍👍😊
This was so helpful. Very clear. Thank you.
your videos are so helpful. they clarified a lot of things for me. thank you
Really loved it! Needed this so bad!
This video was gooder than udder ones. You great.
gonna love with ur explanation method
You are fantastic!! Bless you big time!!
Best lecture... everything is explained with reasons....very useful
I am confident that I will get an excellent grade tomorrow on my final exam. "Nuff" respect!!
this is nice i think i understand the hypothesis testing because i was unable to understand during the lecture session
Now this is a proper video..not some dumb shit we come across on youtube....thanks buddy ..
You are awesome.Grace be with you
Excellent tutorial. Ready for my exam now.
thank you sir. your explanation is great and make me understand to deal the question for hypothesis testing
Thank you very much. You example helped me to understand very well
Thanks for saving my semester ❤
Thanks a lot man, I swear to God I got 100% on my final exam, you helped me a lot ❤️❤️
Thank you for presenting this material so clearly and concisely!
I have a book, is says that when the sample size is less than 30, then use
s/,/n-1 in the formula. Below xbar minus ù
Really nice..I didn't know squat about this topic and now I know..keep it up!
everything needed, thank you so much.
Thanks for this easy to understand video!
Simply explained yet very helpful 👌
this has been helpful for me, n has come in the nick of time
Wonderfully explained... Great job buddy..
Thanks Chris for nice videos for statistics. When do you use a significant level of 0.05 and when for 0.01?
Since the alternative hypothesis is less than , the rejection region should be on the right not on the left
Thank you so much!! Example is detailedly explained! I fully uds now !!
Thank you! this is very helpful!!!!!!!!!
Mike .Su Glad I could help :)
you are really a good professor.All professors should study the way he explains from the inner heart.May Jesus bless you and family Sir
amazing as usual! Thanks again
finally a video that made sense. Thanks
i think the alternative hypothesis would be >100 since alternative hypothesis is the inverse of null hypothesis.here null would be 100 .
Your presentation is very helpful! thanks for your t-table..
Awesome experience watching your video.God bless you.
thanks mate. hope i pass finals
Wow !this was amazing💪🏼💪🏼
Well explained,I think I'm set to tomorrow's exams.
Wow! I am subscribing! Thank you!!!
Thank you very much, do you have two tailed for t?
Found ur video very useful . Plz do videos on estimation also
Excellent video. Thank you so much sir
A very good teacher
Wonderful explanation ,Thanks !
Ur very nice.
U simplified it via steps.
A fan for life
more clear than my teacher , thanks a lot
Simple and good explaination
Critical value of alpha at 0.05 level will be 1.645
good video. However, shouldn't the null hypothesis be that the IQ is >=100?
I think so because alternativ hypothesis is just a complement to null hypothesis,isn't it?
Thank you, you made it super clear.
Super helpful. Thank you very much
the best lecture ever!!!
so easy to get. thanks a lot
Thank you so much!, It is so clear to understand 😍😍😁
how to choose which t test unpair pair
df is different in t test eg t test regression n-2
How is the null hypothesis always an equals sign? We were taught that you only use "equals" and "not equal" when dealing with a two tailed test. Anytime we work with a one-tailed test we use "less than or equal to" and "greater than" or vice versa.
@codiakLBJfan, I think that the null hypothesis in this case should be Ho: mean>=100 and not mean=100
thank you sir for the amazing video you are a life saver
A brilliant piece indeed !!
Hypothesis testing demystified and reduced to rubble
Thank you sir, if I test in two tails in t distribution?
Thank you for making this clear!
Really nicely done
So helpful, learned alot. Ty v much boss.... 👍👍
Thank u sir. This is really helpful.
Well explained dude
Wonderfull job. Tell me what, we use 4 df because we estimate the population SD, right?
this video SAVED ME
How did you get the standard deviation though? Is there a formula in finding it?
These are so helpful!