NFL Top 10 Dynasties: '60s Green Bay Packers
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2015
- NFL counts down the Top 10 Dynasties of all-time. Check out where the 1960s Green Bay Packers land on the list!
Subscribe to the NFL RUclips channel to see immediate in-game highlights from your favorite teams and players, daily fantasy football updates, all your favorite NFL Network podcasts, and more!
Subscribe to NFL on RUclips: goo.gl/VmTK0M
For all things NFL, visit the league's official website at www.nfl.com/
Watch NFL Now: www.nfl.com/now
Start your free trial of NFL Game Pass: www.nfl.com/gamepass
Listen to NFL podcasts: www.nfl.com/podcasts
Fantasy Football: www.nfl.com/fantasyfootball
Watch the NFL network: nflnonline.nfl.com/
Download the NFL mobile app: www.nfl.com/apps
2015 NFL Schedule: www.nfl.com/schedules
Buy tickets to watch your favorite team: www.nfl.com/tickets
Shop NFL: www.nflshop.com/source/bm-nflc...
Like us on Facebook: / nfl
Follow us on Twitter: / nfl
Follow us on Instagram: / nfl 
Спорт
And during their Super Bowl win years, they were actually ranked higher as a passing team than a running team. Bart Starr is criminally underrated.
You are absolutely right -well said
The offensive line plus Taylor and Hornung were still very skilled but older. Defenses were planning more to stop their running game. No problem. They went to the air.
"How do you put anyone above those 4 titles?!"
"The 60s Packers won 5"
Had the officials flagged the Eagles for sitting on Taylor, we might be talking 6 titles
Not too mention 3 in a row
@@joachimguderian4048 well, 2 back to back then the three peat. Packers are the only team to ever win three titles in a row. And they've done it twice
@@DTOStudios the first time they did it there was no championship game tho
@@keidrinwilliam3085 actually there it was a championship the NFL title game as it was known had been played since 1933 it wasn't until the NFL and the afl (afl formed in 1960) agreed to have the two top teams in each league in 1966 that the super bowl was born and the two leagues didn't officially merge until after Namath beat the colts in 1968
"You know why they're named after Steel?"
-Response
"You know why the Trophy is named after Lombardi?"
So right man all about the Green and Gold
yup
+No Name not named after "steel" lol
JADAMS
Steel - a hard, strong, gray or bluish-gray alloy of iron with carbon and usually other elements, used extensively as a structural and fabricating material.
Pittsburgh also known as Steel City
Pittsburgh Steelers
School helps
+No Name actually they represent the steel workers of Pittsburgh. "blue collared boys"
Toughest dynasty ever! coached by the greatest coach of all time!
YeahStu incorrect
Correct
@@gamer72596 ur prop a Pat's fan
@@unturnedantics2662 Bears fan*
Lombardi's great achievement as had been stated was not that he made men into football players but that he made football players into men.
Coming from a Lions fan (go ahead, I've every joke out there), the Lombardi Packers are the gold standard. Can't help but respect Lombardi and his teams. Five championships in seven years? Wasn't done before, and will never be done again.
And a .900 playoff record.
From Pittsburgh here ....grew up in the 1970s. Packers without a doubt.
"What were trying to get is a seal here, and a seal here, and try to run this play.. in the alley!"
thats what I remember about lombardi
Was all Green Bay growning up in the 60’s….went south to become a Falcon fan in 66’ will always respect the Packers from Green Bay, titletown USA 🇺🇸 🏈
Falcons got to play the Pack in their inaugural season. Tommy Nobis was their highlight in that game although the score was lopsided.
I was a Tom Landry-era Dallas Cowboys fan. Obviously #15 & his legendary teammates left me crying more times than I care to remember😅. He & Unitas were definitely my favorite "enemy" QBs.
I cannot believe that the funeral for the field general of the greatest team in pro football history is NOT going to be at Lambeau Field. If Yankee Stadium was known as
"The House That Ruth Built".... then Lambeau Field no doubt is "The House That Bart Starr Built".
R.I.P. MISTER Bart Starr
God bless our pro football heroes from a bygone era.🏈
Thank you, NFL! The GB Packers are unquestionably the finest team of all time!!
They absolutely deserve to be number one. Not only did they win the first two Super Bowls but they went to four NFL Championships and won three in an era of excellence. That was a League that featured the Madison Avenue Giants, the last of the great Halas Bears teams, the Browns - still one of the more successful teams in the league, especially when Jim Brown was in the backfield - the Baltimore Colts squads that had a litany of All Pros and, later, Hall of Famers, and the start of the great Landry Cowboys teams toward the end of the decade (the Packers won two close, hard fought games against them in order to go to those first two Super Bowls).
Pretty good list the 60 Packers put the D in dynasty. They are the gold standard for a football dynasty, not the greatest team but the greatest dynasty.
There really has never been a team like Lombardi’s Packers.
As a lifelong Packer fan , the biggest reason for being #1 : 3 straight championships. Period. End of discussion.
Hold on now. It was two championships back to back, and then later 3 in a row. Even better
Biggest reason it’s #1: 5 championships in the 60’s.
I've been a die--hard Steelers fan since 1972 and out of respect for my elders - You have give the Packers number 1 to keep them happy
Wrong jr. Packers won 5 in 7 years including 3 in a row. Squeelers didn’t.
Every week I wish I had the privilege of being in each stadium in which an NFL game is about to take place. The devotion of the fans to their team itself is worth the price of admission. Truly, one of the very wonderful part of our culture.
The Packers should be the most valuable team in NFL, not the Cowboys!
I know right
+B JAWS should've invested more money then. i'm amazingly surprised no matter how many times the cowboys lose but still able to reach a $4 bill in most valuable sport team! gotta give them a credit.
1990Thunderbolt Yeah I know it is kind of weird honestly but maybe they focus too much on that aspect of their team and not the part where they need to win games :)
B JAWS or maybe green bay is too small to be investing $$$$ i guess. i thought the giants should've been more valuable team than the cowboys cause you know. it's new york but awkwardly the patriots are above the giants in the most valuable franchise just behind the cowboys.
B JAWS lies
1:47 looks like Peyton
It’s Paul hornung
The trophy name after Vince Lombardi that’s why the Green Bay packers 60’s is number one!
As a Steeler fan I'm defn okay with the packers being number one I mean the trophy is named after there coach haha number 1 dynasty of any sport is the New York Yankees though 60s or late 90s take your pick
Gordon Smith or the late 40's and into early 50's when they have FIVE championships in a row.....
Yankees 1920's.
U meam in American sports of course
Plus while it was impressive as hell the Steelers won 4 Super Bowls in 6 years, but the Packers won 5 NFL Championships in 7 years, including 3 in a row 1965-67
@@MrRadiantMan yeah. This is an American sports debate.
Lombardi in his prime in the 70's,that would have been interesting. Could he have taken down the Steel Curtain,who knows.
He had the Redskins moving in the right direction and I have ZERO doubts they would’ve won titles thru the 70’s with Vince.
When Jerry finally gets his dues this year, it will be complete!!!!
At 2:10, Wrigley Field's southeast corner end zone, not 10 yards deep because of the baseball season's visiting team's dugout. Notice the photographer standing on the back end zone line.
Se when they talk about the 50s Browns everyone is like ''Why are they on the list, I could've been the best player in the league back then, it wasn't popular bla bla..'', but the 60s Packers, they are number one for sure! lol
Dynasty's are of the times they played not who they would be playing 50 years later.... if that's the case, then NO team could be a dynasty because 50 years from now people will be saying "I could have played back then and been one of the best players in the league" In the time they played they were a dynasty...
Lombardi always had a winning record
60s Pack the best, period.
Hall of Fame Jerry Kramer
Let's go! #1 all day!!
The 1960s Packers EASILY #1. First off, they won MORE Championships in their Decade (5 Total!) than either the 70s Steelers or the 80s 49ers (4 each respectively).
Not to Mention, they WON 3 CONSECUTIVE CHAMPIONSHIPS IN A ROW! A Feat that has YET To be Duplicated!
Anyone sitting here going "Oh they were great, but that #1" Clearly need to get their heads checked. They also produced one of the Greatest Teams of all time in the 1962 Packers.
They produced 11 Hall of Famers on that squad, which SHOULD be 12, because Jerry Kramer is STILL getting Screwed by the NFL Hall of Fame.
The Trophy is Named after their Head Coach, Vince Lombardi and when you check his Resume of 9-1 in the Post-Season during the 60s, that pretty much says it all.
The 1960s Packers are the GREATEST NFL Dynasty of All Time, period. Their is No Argument.
Jin Kazama The World Football league came along and broke up the early 70's Dolphins. Csonka, Kick and Warfield were taken. The Steelers would not have had as many titles. The Browns of the 50's won more championships than Lombardi's Packers.
Their is no argument, tough to argue with that?
Jin Kazama agreed 👍
Congrats. You proved a point that is 100% incorrect.
1960's Packers dynasty is just like the 1960's Celtics dynasty, dominating in a inferior league with less teams.
Even though I completely agree with the '60s Packers being number one, because the most coveted trophy in NFL is rightfully named after the coach who won the first Super Bowl, the '60s Packers are also a great argument against the teams' & players' worth by how many Super Bowls they won since the NFL & football existed long before that game was played, if you extend the discussion into championships a player & team have won, a lot of other great teams & players re-enter the conversation and lots of football legends have been forgotten or undervalued because the NFL & fans use the Super Bowl as it's only measuring stick of greatness.
The 60's Packers were pioneers of the game we love today. I wouldn't call them a dynasty that we can compare to today's Patriots, for example. I don't think we can compare 60's football to 2000's and 2010's.
U don't see a team winning 3 Super Bowls in a row, now do u.
The Pack were everything when I was a kid.
The Packers have the most Championships out of any franchise, and therefore they are the best franchise in NFL history. They won 8 NFL champions & 5 Super Bowls. That's a combined 13 championships, which means the Packers are the best team in NFL history not the Steelers.
*4 Superbowls
Dont hav most superbowls
I wish the two teams could play each other in their primes. That would be an interesting game.
NFL Championships were played in a tinier league, with fewer and smaller and slower players, over fewer games and no playoffs. Counting them alongside Superbowls is absurd. Furthermore, ANY "dynasty" built before Free-Agency is a joke by comparison and should automatically fall in rank by that token alone.
There's no logically coherent rationale for placing pre-salary-cap/pre-free-agency "dynasties" over the monumentally more difficult and complicated task of establishing and maintaining such performance in the modern era...
In the Superbowl era the Steelers are better
1:20 I thought he was Aaron Rodgers at first lol
Go pack go
1:47 is that Peyton?
Go Pack Go!
Greatest ever, no doubt!
DrNuggetFTW there is a doubt ... he only won two Super Bowls... when the NFL really started in 1966
JeanCarlos Berasgoico 5 nfl championships
The Green Bay Packers - the only team to win three consecutive championships 1929-1931 & 1965-1967. All time 13 championships. No other team has done it.
The reaction of Mr. Dameshek, bitter..
1. 80's 49ers
2. 00's (to present) Pats
3. 70's Steelers
4. 60's Packers
5. 90's Cowboys
6. 80's Redskins
7. 70's Dolphins
8. 70's Raiders
9. 90's Bills
10. 70's Vikings
Nearly impossible to argue with their #1 and #2. It's almost scary how similar those two teams were in the way they were put together. As a longtime Steelers fan (first year I remember watching football was Noll's first year as head coach), I _want_ to argue Pittsburgh for #1, but I have to admit Lombardi's Packers deserve that spot. They just have more areas where they were a little better than the 70's Steelers, than Pittsburgh has where they were a little better than the 60's Packers.
+mastick I have to say as a Cowboys fan, Steelers deserved #1. They played great against us a lot of the time.
+mastick 5 out of 7 beats 4 out of 6. But much respect to the Steelers.
+Cthulhu Is Out True God also played tougher competition. I think packers got the pick out of respect.
Yeah this is the #1 dynasty. The Packers only lost 1 playoff game that entire 9 year stretch. They dominated every opponent. I believe there were 12 hall of famers were on that squad. #1 no question.
I believe the 1960's Packers would even beat the teams of today. Teams today are faster, better trained, with an expanded playbook....but if they had to play by 1960's rules....they'd be whining about holding, helmet to helmet, one bar face mask & having teeth knocked out, & no ground causes a fumble!
Absolutely! Today’s players would be left in tears and in a daze when they get hit by the likes of Jerry Kramer or Ray Nitzhke.
Whos number 1??: Who cares.......just be happy that someone put the list together.......
Why
Who has the most Super Bowl steelers O and the trophy is named the Lombardi trophy because Vince Lombardi created the superbowls and in 1966 the nfl conference said the first team to win the Super Bowl the trophy would be named after the coach of the team that won the first Super Bowl
+Suzanne Cortese No. I think the trophy was named to honor Lombardi after his untimely death due to cancer after his first year coaching the Redskins. Of course the fact that Lombardi is the greatest coach in NFL history didn't hurt.
The big knock I have on the 60's Packers, which isn't their fault, but just the lack of NFL teams by that point in the year as compared to the 70's Steelers. There were only 13-16 teams during the 60s, so it was easier for teams to make the playoffs or dominate during the regular season then. Also, what other dynasty can you name from the 60's besides the Packers while the 70's had Tom Landry's Cowboys, Joe Maddon's Raiders, Don Shula's Dolphins, and the Chuck Noll's Steelers. Thus, I have to give the edge to the Steelers because they had to play against more teams, better competition, and better head coaches than the Packers did in the 60's. Again it's not the Packers' fault, but just the history of the game of football in my eyes.
Saved by Jackie Smith? Wow, didn't know that was to win the game, you're delusional, the better team overcomes, turnovers, penalties, dropped passes or never does those things, frankly if it wasn't for onside kicks, the Steelers win both of those 70's SBs by double digits
Joseph Harris The browns of the 60s with Jim brown
The rams with the fearsome foursome.
the Giants who went to straight championship games
The colts who good, most of the 60s
the cowboys of course
**went to 3 straight championship games**
um pretty sure the playoff field was actually really slim then... 2 teams .. so actually kinda tough to make playoff
Yes, the Steelers won 4 world titles in 6 years. The Packers won 5 world titles in 7 years. I think that wins the argument. The Steelers were a great, great team in the 70s, but they came up one title short.
Lombardi and the 60s packers alone account for 5 of the 13 titles all time and wants more impressive it was in 7 years
27 bears were here.
this is the wrong video for this but in a super bowl at the very prime of their dynasty who would win : 70s steelers or 80s 49ers
How many dynasties were from the 70s on this list and the Steelers stood above them all.
And to think they barely beat the Vikings in the SB. 2-0 at halftime. 9-6 going into the 4th Q. A very winnable defensive struggle. And of course, a clear Pitt fumble that was recovered by Minn deep in Pitt territory late in the game that was incorrectly ruled no fumble. If frickin Tarkenton played even an average game, that Viking team should have and would have won the 74 season SBowl. And who knows then how that changes the rest of the 70s.
Imo, the word dynasty is way misused with respect to sports. A dynasty for me is about absolute dominance over an extended number of years. I define it in any sport as a minimum of 3 consecutive championships. By that definition, there are only 2 in NFL history. The first was the 1929-1931 Green Bay Packers. The second was the 1965-1967 Packers. Pittsburgh has been the best franchise in the Super Bowl era because they have won the most championships during that time, but dynasty, no. Also, the 1922-1924 Bulldogs don't count at least by NFL rules. This is because the 1922 and 1923 teams were in Canton while the 1924 team was in Cleveland. The NFL decided these were 2 different franchises though I think a lot of the players were the same in Canton and Cleveland. Btw, that's a good trivia question. Which was the first NFL championship team from Cleveland? Not the 1950 Browns, not the 1945 Cleveland Rams, but the 1924 Cleveland Bulldogs.
BALLERS
+TheGodlyFJ They're the greatest mmmkay
3 in a row. 3. In. A. Row.
Case closed.
3 in a row twice
Let's be real Bill Walsh's 1980 49ers are the greatest
I wonder, say the 60's dynasty Packers vs 50's dynasty Browns. Who would win. Guess we'll never know.
If this is 1957+ Browns, then they might win but pre-57' Packers no doubt win
If the 60 Packers in their prime played the 70s Steelers in their prime, who would win?🤔
We do
And by we I mean the fans
As far as the game probably end in a tie
Packers would win. Lombardi was the better coach and motivator. Starr was a more efficient passer than Bradshaw was, Taylor and Hornung were better runners than Franco and Bleier.
@@Tyrunner0097 the line woud be Steelers -500 Packer ´+600
Packers and Steelers..
I don't believe they should be 1, but trust me, they are great. They won 3 titles before the championship was called the Super Bowl, then REPEATED and won the first two Super Bowls!!! But they should be only 4 or 5
i don't know about that. at least top 3 id say. id say the 70's stealers bay them and maybe 1 other dynasty
I think the browns 50s were just as good and deserve to be on this list
+Orange Kurushhh They are. They came in at #6.
80's 49ers vs 60's Packers
Final score:
SF 72 GB 9
70's Steelers vs 60's Packers
Final score:
Pitt 24 GB 0
90'Cowboys vs 60's Packers
Final score:
DAL 44 GB 6
I mean, 72 is unrealistic. I would say...
80's 49ers vs Packers
49ers 43 GB 10
70's Steelers vs Packers
(Before Mel Blount Rule) Pitt 20 GB 0
(After Mel Blount Rule) Pitt 33 GB 7
90's Cowboys vs Packers
DAL 38 GB 14
Prove it dipniblets.
There was like 15 teams when they were in the league. They not even close to as good as the Patriots of the 00/10's Montana's 49ers or Dallas in the 90s. This list should be redone.
So winning 5 championships in a row by Starr and Lombarde not as good as them? Think about it. This is not because of how they were in the superbowl. It's how to they manage to win. They play to win. They don't play to just play.
What does the number of teams have to do with anything? But if you want to argue that, fine. The league now is watered down with players who would have been home mowing their lawns on Sundays back then. Only the best played in those days. Not only fewer teams, but fewer players on the rosters. Every team was filled with the toughest guys.
Green Bay was never caught cheating multiple times.
I'm assuming you mean the pats who were caught for the spygate one day after that new rule was put in place, and the deflategate which was false. Spygate the pats gotta hold that L, but deflategate was a sham.
what? hell no. Niners of the 80's
This was before the salary cap era. If there had never been a salary cap, more teams would have been able to be successful longer.
Yeap but that’s not how it was so deal with it plus the team is own by the fans it’s a miricale the team survived into the 90s lol
In my opinion, I think that in terms of coaches, Vince obviously takes the cake. I mean they named a trophy after him! But in case of dynasties, I think the Steelers come on top. With the argument of the packers won more trophies, The first thing to note is that the teams in the 70s were more skilled, hit harder, threw faster, than the sixties. You have the Raiders, Rams. People like Jack Youngblood, and the Steelers still dominated. They were and still ARE the best team in history. And you can’t forget how horrendously shitty the Steelers were before. The Steelers made plays many wouldn’t think were possible and hits harder than baseball bats.
You can’t beat that!
we have 27 haters watching this video 📹! H8RS
The obvious problem with the methodology of this count down is that it's an inarguable fact that ANY pre-salary-cap/pre-free-agency "dynasty" is _necessarily and *automatically*_ compromised by that condition and is therefore _inferior_ to any dynasty established _AFTER_ that change.
I mean, the system was _specifically_ instituted for the entire PURPOSE of preventing _exactly_ these kinds of perennial dynastic successes, and so, an organization being able to achieve the same, consistent level of stellar performance over such a monumentally long period of time with virtually nothing remaining the same other than the coach, the QB and the knowledge that your roster is going to turn over dramatically from season to season means that such an accomplishment *STARTS OUT* at being an order of magnitude more impressive than *any* similar achievement by some pre-FA/cap team that essentially built one amazing team that they then flogged to victories over substantially shorter windows of time.
Willfully ignoring that simple but inarguable axiom is what absolutely _destroys_ any potential integrity that this list may have pretended (or wished) that it might have had...
brtle ya but the AFL didn't belong on the same field with the NFL teams for 3 more years. So you look at the teams they took the champions from.There the same teams there still fighting with.ecept the Browns. giants Dallas oakland chiefs fearsome 4 some .Don't try to diminish what they accomplish. there only crime is they didn't nickname it the superbowl. there rings all say the same thing the last time I checked.
Yeppers! Way more difficult to sustain success these days. It's fun to watch the film of all these great teams, but telling which is really the best dynasty? Very much a subjective thing when the greatest runs occurred when it was least difficult to accomplish them.
Yeah. Today teams only lose their good players to free agency. They never pick up good players to fill holes. Sure. Ask Bill Belichick about that.
I think the 40s/50s Browns should be number one. 10 straight title games in a row, more championships than the Packers and the greatest coach, Paul Brown. I would like anyone try to convince me Lombardi outdid him in any category.
Lombardi did it with lesser players than the Browns. Bart Starr was not comparable to Otto Graham. Boyd Dowler was not Dante Lavelli. Lombardi insisted on out executing the other team, being so precise with their plays, they could tell the other team what was coming, and still couldn't be stopped. Also, even with Jim Brown, Paul Brown couldn't make the championship game during the Lombardi years.
Those 10 "titles" weren't all NFL titles, they were AAFC titles. Sorry, different league. Canadian titles don't count either.
@@Tyrunner0097 Bart Starr is criminally underrated. He still holds on to the #4 highest postseason passer rating ever
yeah right. NE #1
Haha ok stupid deflatriot scrub
DrNuggetFTW that's all you have on the patriots? Because they've been better than the packers in this century... haha it's okay man
U dont see patriots win 3 championships in row, now do u. Stupid patriot fan
One can certainly make that case. Way more difficult to sustain success in the free agency and salary cap era. And I'm a Lions fan, so I certainly have no horse in the race.
Nebraska dosnt even have a football team
still think the 90s Cowboys are the best team 93 Cowboys all day
Hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahagahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaga
These top ten lists are the epitome of subjectivity. It should be called the "top ten according to nfl network"
Ahead of the 70's Steelers ? Hell no, I'm not a Steelers fan and I think they should be number 1
Vince and his boys. Yes, number one fits. The Patriots have won more SB's, but Bill's name isn't on the trophy. Think about it.
lets behonest if the superbowl was around when Lombardi started to coach the packers they would have 9 superbowls at this point instead of there 4 lets (and by the way to tht silly person who wanted the steelers to be number 1 cause they wone 4 out of 6 superbowls ya.....packers would of won 5 out of 6 pretty sure tht would be better)
Maths
2000's & 2010's New England Patriots.
If you don’t love Pittsburgh you don’t love freedom
Me this is about football not freedom
Great, but shouldn't be No.1
What is goofball Nagler doing here?
Philadelphia Eagles won multiple National championships before it was called the Super bowl and they have been to three super bowls and won the super bowl this year against the cheating New England Patriots..PHILLY PHILLY..FLY EAGLES FLY
No won cares dude. Got back to living in the past
The 70's Steelers easily. You could NOT GET PASSED the Steele Curtain. ANY team today couldn't
The Packers defense in the 60's was just as good, if not better than the 70's Steelers.
The Packers had Hall of Famers at every level of that defense. Willie Davis and Henry Jordan on the line, Ray Nitschke and Dave Robinson at LB, Herb Adderly and Willie Wood in the secondary. Plus, Pro-Bowlers like Lionel Aldridge, Lee Roy Caffey, and Bob Jeter.
They may not have gotten the fanfare, but any player from that era would say that the Packers easily had one of the top 5 best defenses in football during the 60's.
almost every single player of the 70's Steelers difference was a pro bowler, and like half the team became a HOFer, and is shown on the top 100 list. Only packers player I know on that list is Ray Nitschke, but there may be more.
You’re delusional if you believe the Packers are #1. That spot belongs to the golden boy and bellichick now..
1980s 9ers should be #1
ShawnMJ Babcock no they shouldn't
Any evidence or facts to back up your claim Willis?
12 teams and bad competition gets you #1? Did you see those players in the highlights? Looked like they were playing high school kids... They don't even make the top 3, would've been smoked by Steelers, Niners, Cowboys, and Patriots.
The same then could be said regarding the 60's Boston Celtics and the NY Yankees.... and you can't compare era's. They were the best of their era. The Steelers were all on the juice as a coach later admitted. Take all these players off PHD's, and year around weight lifting and GB could have played with any of them. John Niland, a guard for Dallas, played from 66-75 and he went against those Vikings, Steelers, Dolphins, Lions, Rams, & Broncos, defenses and he said that he felt the Packers were the best defense he ever faced.
Take Notice man the ignorance is insane
Bad competition? As I mentioned above, that competition included the great Colts teams of the era, the last of the great Halas Bears squads, and the Browns when they were consistent contenders. Those three teams were in their division. Then they had to deal with the Giants of the early 1960s and the Cowboys coming into their own under Tom Landry? No, I don't think so.
dcbandnerd Not to mention a Lions team with a terrifying defense and the ever consistent Rams of the era
@@dcbandnerd There were some great players they had to play against in the 60's.
Sam Huff, Y.A. Tittle, Gale Sayers, Jim Brown, Alex Karras, Butkus, Bob Hayes, Bob Lily, Johnny Unitas, Lenny Moore, Raymond Berry, Roosevelt Brown, Merlin Olson, Joe Schmidt. Just to name a few...
Patriots are the greatest dynasty of all time. 7 superbowl appearances 5 superbowl wins 9 conference champions 11 conference championship game appearances 15 division titles. Just stop it already.
5 rings in 8 years, including a threepeat. That was Green Bay. The Pats are doing it in an era where you can barely touch the QB without getting called, and they also cheated to get at least one of them. Think of this-a national sportscaster said on the air that other players were calling the Seahawks and telling them to be very careful, because the Pats had spies everywhere. You stop it already. For the record, GB has 13 rings. They had 12 before the Pats had one. Nice try.
@@pauljohnson3340
5 NFL titles in 7 years.
Pittsburgh won 4 out of 6? Packers won 5 out of 7. Packers win.
Could Damashek's whining be more annoying?
#1 my ass.
No sugarbritches, what comes out of your ass is #2.
NFL network always has the rankings wrong.
Move over packers patriots are the greatest dynasty of all time.
L should be 5
Tason Womo #9/82 #OlReliable #Clutch #GOATs auotomatic L (cowboys fan)
Let's see the '60s Packers,'70s Steelers,and '80s 49ers win all those championships in the modern era.Not a knock on them,just languishing over how bad this "parity obsessed" NFL is
Packers are the only dynasty in the late sixties and I believe it was in the 30s or 40s in their early years to win three consecutive titles no other team has ever done that the dolphins in the seventies went 71 72 and 73 but they lost in 1971. Montana and the niners got really close but they lost the year for their third in a row to the Giants the year that they beat la in the super bowl. Other than the dolphins and the '70s no team other than the bills but they lost four straight so it really doesn't count has even came close to winning three in a row besides the dolphins in the early seventies. Heck anymore since the 2000s the only repeat team to go back to back is the Patriots and 2003 and 2004 granted yes they won three out of four years but once again if you include the entire history of the NFL which they still acknowledge records pre super bowl era it's not like baseball and you had that stupid dead ball era. They still recognize that there's only one team to have ever won three titles in a row and that is the Green Bay Packers and they've done it twice in their history and they did it with Vince Lombardi also
sorry packer fans, BUT he did not faces the issues they face today, YES the AFL was stealing players, but lets get real the Pats (PS i am not a fan) are #1, like them or hate them - they are the best combo (QB & Coach) ever.
Anyone that calls them cheaters, would not say that if it was there team AGAIN, I AM NOT PATS - just honest.
Patriots won 3 in 4 years... Packers won 5 on 7 years. Case closed.
congrats to the packers with no free agency that rips teams apart every year, eg. this year no "real QB" in Denver, is that there fault maybe) but please don't compare. With the changes in rules, player development and film study breakdowns to 9 millionth degree, the packers would not go 5 for 7 in today's NFL and you can bet your sweet ass the Pats would in the mid-to-late 60.
+Music Guru Pats would get blown out.
GoodbyeHercules! LOL, first of all as a general statement NFL players today would destroy 99% of the NFL players back in the mid-late 60's. There defense line averaged under 245 lbs. Most NFL teams would not even need to pass. As for QB Brady is the best ever like it or not. Bill is underrated by the "football experts" of today because he is viewed as a cheater. They all cheat bro.
i get it 5 championships but does anybody honestly believe that the Packers could beat Pittsburgh of the 70's Montana's 9ers or Dallas of the 90's. hell no
+SkyScream 7 Do we play by the 60's rules or the 80's/90's rules?
If it's the 60's rules, good luck with your passing game as your receivers get hammered on their routes all game long.
+SkyScream 7 - If we could dial it up on a time machine, I'd love to see the 60s Packers play the 70s Steelers. THAT would be football!
+PackerBronco In that logic, the Steelers should probably be tied for 1 then. Same rule set, same results. And given that there was less competition for the Packers early on, it's a virtual tie.
+Matthew Beazley every team only plays one team at a time, so I'm not sure about less competition
I meant in terms of other very good teams they played. The Steelers played very good teams in the Dolphins, Raiders, Cowboys, and Vikings. The 49ers played against great Bears, Giants, and Redskins teams. The Cowboys had the Eagles, Bears, and Bills, not to mention a solid 49ers team.
Who did the Packers have? An early Landry Cowboys? They had to play fewer games against fewer great opponents. That's not worthy of "greatest dynasty ever", even with Lombardi as it's head.
Number 1 dynasty should have been the 70's steelers. Fight me.
Patriots are the greatest nfl dynasty now. Move over packers. Belichick now has more championships as head coach, then Lombardi. 6-5. Mark my words that trophy will either have a another name on there or Lombardi will be removed and Belichick name will be added.
Lmfao. Dream on fruitcake.
they are definitely #1 but their offense was boring sweep, sweep over and over and over again geez use the pass of once in while Lombardi damn
It worked, who cares what plays they run as long as they win!
+DrNuggetFTW i know
Boring sometimes wins over fancy. Yes, Lombardi had a simple playbook, but his demand for perfect execution from his players is unprecedented.
i dunno how thrilling it is to watch every team just throw 5 yd outs practically every play nowadays.. na gotta luv it run it down their throats till they puke..
firs
Wow whoever Nick Stevens is but that was not only the worst take on Lombardi ever but one of the least funny statements I've ever heard. When I found out I had cancer I laughed more