I’VE MADE A MISTAKE! - 8-bit colour isn’t 128 colours, it’s 256. Kids, this is why you should ALWAYS check your work and not do what I do… but regardless, the same principle still applies 👌🏻 thanks for watching. Time to start proofing my work more 😂
I feel like the differences were huge. You can really see it in the shot of the girls face, skin tones look more natural in cam A. Shadows in cam B have a blue/magenta tint like you said. Cam A overall feels more warm, soft, and has a more natural appealing look.
I think your scene selection in woodland was less challenging that you'd get in some other situations. I'm thinking that smooth color or luminance gradients aren't often found in green foliage, but are sometimes found in cityscapes, sunsets over water etc., and then banding might be more obvious.
If only banding is problem... theoretically that could be done by in post... by simply smoothing our sharp differences between colors. Not sure if that feature exists, but just saying it should be possible logically.
B to me seems to have more dynamic range but it could just be the contrast is higher than Cam A - excited to see the outcome and awesome video = well put together and clear
The stairs was such a good way to explain it! I thought A was 8 bit, but changed my mind with the photo of the sign. I think the difference is so small most people wojldn't notice the difference, and I'm not sure the difference is worth another £1000 to upgrade to the a7iv.
I worked for a company making their social media content from phone footage. The footage was all 8-bit, but it was surprisingly gradable. 8-bit has more flexibility than people give it credit for. I grade and edit in resolve, so I had no issues as long as I used the tools that were colorspace aware. It could even withstand a CST to Arrilog c3.
I picked camera A for 10 bit only because I noticed slight difference in the shots with the leaves. I only recently have cameras that can shoot 10bit and some in raw, but honestly I don’t like to use those features as much because of the massive storage needed for them. I’ve been working with 8bit for years and know how to shoot without having to fix that much in post(where 10 bit and raw come in most useful)
Lightbulb moment! Fantastic description of the difference between 8-bit & 10-bit. The staircase graphic was a stroke of genius. Made perfect sense. Thank you. Waiting for Black Friday to order my A7Siii, but its so hard to wait :-). One month, more or less, to go. Another wonderfully illuminating video Danny. Thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge in such a great way.
Glad it helped your understanding! And it’s a pleasure, I love making these videos as I learn as I make them. I’d never directly compared 8-bit and 10-bit until this, so it’s definitely eye openings as I make these videos. Thank you for watching!
@@DannyBligh yeah having the A7iii and the A7iv shows up a massive difference between the two. Time to sell the A7iii I think and upgrade that to the A7Siii. Thanks again and keep them coming.
Viewing on an iPhone 14 pro at the default setting (480p), they looked indistinguishable. When I bumped the resolution to 2160p I could definitely see the magenta hue, but no way was any banding apparent, even when I magnified to 8x. I had to screenshot the image and zoom right in to one the gaps between tree branches and the sky to see the colour banding. At that magnification the bands in the colour gradations are visible on the left too, but on the right side they’re m ever so slightly more pronounced. That’s what told me the right hand side (B) was 8-bit. To be honest the magenta hue didn’t tip me off, though it should have as my a7RIV suffers from that, while my a7SIII doesn’t. I can’t wait to find a buyer for the RIV so I can splash out on the RV and the image from both my bodies will match right out of the box 🙂
Sony likely compresses 6K down to 4K to reduce most the banding and gradient issues, at least on older 8-bit Alpha cameras with color-profiles. Also, I’m sure it’s even more reduced if newer Alpha lines provide more than 100mbps (12MB/S) across the buss to SD cards. It’s odd that Sony only allows 100mbps when Panasonic allowed 200mbps on the the GH4 or higher. 100mbps is only 500KB per frame set at 24fps. 24MP is 1-2MB per image when compressed so Sony could have at least given us 200mbps for a full MB per frame of headroom.
if you want to see spesifcly defferent between 8 bit and 10 bit, you should be shoot under or over exposure, from there we know that 10 bit better to save highlight and shadow.
Even youtube already convert the video to 8bit, but i think we still can see which one is 8bit, which one is 10bit. I know you tried to match the both camera, but notice the detail (color of the tree, exposure from sky, skin color changing,...) I think it depend on situation, with the good lighting, slight color correction and grading will not make the big different. Ofc, with some project that you working with so much lighting, specialy with RGB lighting, 8bit and 10bit will make a big change. But i still prefer shooting with the highest quality you can, you dont know if you really need to fix it in post or not :D Good video btw, thank you man.
Absolutely, I'd never normally go that heavy on a grade though haha! But some people do, and you've got to properly test the two. That's why I included both ungraded and graded
The biggest difference I can see daily is backlight. Like person standing back to the window in sunny day. You can forget about window details while exposing the subject but... Is that really important or just telling the story and quicker workflow? Thats individual.
Might be wrong, but I think you are missing the main point here. Yes, banding is an issue, and additional compression on RUclips will make it worse anyway. But the main advantage of the 10 bit is how far can you push colors until they start to look all wonky. Therefore, there is a significant difference in possible end result.
Not missed the point at all. Colours fall apart in 8-bit far sooner than 10-bit, they where there's graded and ungraded clips, and the graded clips are heavily graded to try and break the image without being ridiculous. The reason 8-bit colours start to look what you call wonky is because of the lack of information, the lack of colours available, the shadows a lot of the time become super blocky and that's due to the banding which stretching the image causes. The main advantage is obviously as you say, how far you can push it. And it's the same with 12-bit and 14-bit. But the whole reason for this channel is to go further than what other people explain. I want everybody to go away with more understand of 10-bit is better because 10 is bigger than 8. A lot of RUclips channels say 'WOW It's got 10-bit colour' and a lot of people I meet in person have no idea what 10-bit truly is, other than 'you can stretch the colour further'. So no, didn't miss the point. Just went deeper, way past the point. But appreciate the comment mate!
In general 8-bit's color looks muted compared to 10-bit...based on the difference in size you would think it would be much more noticeable..but it probably depends on how you're viewing the content e.g. Beautiful large OLED Panel vs tiny crappy phone 😂
The display really is where the differences will mostly be visible because those gaps between 8-bit and 10-bit are magnified. I think it’s also all comes down to the algorithm that’s compressing the data in which honestly any external monitor that converts 8-bit across an HDMI output to ProRes will be better than the internal solution in a camera. Regardless, one should simply learn Sonys color profiles and how to use them correctly for a particular scene in which brings me to the fact Sony made Cine and S-LOG variants for a reason. Most use S-LOG 2-3 improperly and should expose using a external monitor with a LUT applied. Otherwise, I think the formula is expose 2-stops over with S-LOG 2 regardless of what the zebras or internal reference states. I have no clue why Sony does not reference read/correctly internally.
Two of your videos just popped up and gave me exact answers that I was looking for - great channel man! Just picked up the Sony A7iv and finding the best settings. Cheers!
Same thing. I own a D3200, which is not a camera made for videography and it only does record 1080p@30 with 8Bit, but after seeing this maybe I should focus on mastering photography first before wanting a camera capable of 14Bit RAW. :)
One of the most important things is learning with what you have. But I won't deny, there's a few psychological elements to new gear... New video about that coming VERY Soon! Thanks for watching
@@fusseldieb i shoot with a dD5500! i invest in the motorized slider, weebill S with focus motor, lcd monitor, 35 1.8 and 50 1.8 lenses, variable ND Filter and a 150w led light with a 90cm softbox, its make a world apart! There are very good examples of what your camera is capable of here in YT with shooting video, in 5 years I have realized that what people like is how you tell the story, the editing. Don't fall for the silly marketing game that you use the newest camera to make art. 15 years ago people still produced magnificent cinematographic jewels with more basic cameras...
I am gonna take a wild guess here and say B is 10 bit, at leat up to the image with the sign " This way", when I stopped and wrote this. Let's see if I am right! :) but at 1:30 looks like the camera A is the 10 bit...
The camera also makes a big difference. After watching this, i went to test SLOG2 on my original ZV1 and it's terrible and reminds me of why i don't use it even at 100 Mbps. Too much noise and the minimum ISO of 1000 is not good.
First I was like clearly A is 10bit then I forced myself to change my mind XD no idea why, but in the and I guessed it wrong. But there is clearly visible difference. I don't understand how some people can't see it. Probably they just don't know what to look at. The explanation was great, I liked your video a lot, and I wanna work with 10bit :D I just learn color grading now days and I enjoy a lot, and sometimes I feel like I could do a better job with more information. But it is rare at the moment, also davinci asks money if I wanna color grade 10bit footage :D that's holding me back right now the most
Thank you! Glad yo hear that you liked it! For Sony cameras there’s definitely a colour shift between 8 and 10bit - mo idea why! But you can still colour grade 8-bit to a reasonable way. I’ve always found that 8-bit you have to get at the right exposure to get the most out of it. Practice with 8, get good and then you can invest in DaVinci to do 10bit ✌🏻 Thanks for watching
subscribed! thanks danny that helped me to FINALLY understand the colour realm of camera science. that’s one i never really understood and it feels so good to level up in my knowledge thanks to the brilliant stair description that you used. did you use a ninja atmos recorder to bring your Siii up to 10 bit? thanks
Yes and no... 10-bit will always be better, if I had a choice I'd always go for 10-bit. However, if you're wanting to make a quick video and colour grading isn't on the agenda, 8-bit is more than acceptable. Thanks for watching!
That was a simple & therefore a powerfull eyeopener... Thanks a bunch 4 it... in my case it Was a notion that B was darker with a HDRish feel to it, while on the other hand A seemed to be more natural looking - I was leaning towards the 10 bit naturalness on the A, but it wasn't a sure bet, cause the HDR hype would suggest that it's actually B that's the picture world New Age :) Well the difference was noticable, but I think the winner would depend strongly on personal preference... One more THX 4 the video 👀
Got it right in the first 5 seconds honestly. Something about more color information makes it look less "cheap" digital look like mobile phone cameras do. 1080p 10bit or 12 bit 4:4:4/4:2:2 looks miles better to me the 8bit 4k or 8k video.
I’d go even further than that, I always recommend that people invest in the optics more than the camera bodies. You swap bodies every couple of years sometimes but the lenses stay with you for a while
Have to totally disagree on that. Will your lens give you 10-bit, 4k or better dynamic range? Just no.... A shitty camera won't be magicly saved by a good lens. And if for you the lens is more important because of the bokeh or because of more light.... a bit of ISO noise won't kill nobody ;) Peace!
Well explained. With a Camera having no 10 bit option. Does picture profiles like slog Hlg etc gives better dynamic range or color (smooth color shift) compare to normal 8bit footage???
Any profile like log will give you better dynamic range. But you’ll see more banding if you use a narrower profile such as S-log 3. When I owned an A7iii I spent my time filming in cine 4, flatter than normal footage but only just. Also made it easier/faster to grade and correct
@@DannyBligh Thanks! So to be specific- apart from better Dynamic range does any Profile gives smooth color gradient (less color banding) in 8-bit, compared to a normal footage without any picture profile?
Most people don't even look at videos on a decent TV, much less a color calibrated one. They look at it on their phone. As a photographer, I may have a good color calibrated screen but experience has taught me that 99.9% of the people that will be looking at my photos won't. So in the end, how much does it really matter. These days, I just try the get the brightness levels high enough to be screen clearly and I no longer worry about the color because no one cares or can tell this difference anyway. Equipment manufacturers have to come up with new specs every year to convince people to buy new shit :)
Hi, I am using Sony a7s II for almost 8 years now. I was thinking to change to a newer camera like fx30 or a7 iv for 10 bit and s-cinetone. Is it worth changing?
100% worth it. Just the ability to have 10bit but also the colours from the later Sony cameras have evolved so much since the A7Sii. On top of that, you have a huge amount of new features, better autofocus, 4k (with little to no crop on some cameras/modes). As for which to get, the fx30 is a fantastic camera from what i’ve seen. I don’t own one nor have I used one. But I have used an a7iv, i have a few videos on my channel about it and it’s a great camera
It’s more down to how it’s captured and giving the the information to edit and effect it, not so much how it’s rendered. It’s a similar principal across many industries. For instance, a lot of audio in recording studios is recorded at 96Khz as the sample rate, allowing the system to capture anything from 1hz right through to 48Khz. The human ear can only hear between 20hz and 20Khz (and that’s being generous!) but it allows you to control and render it down to what we hear on iTunes 🤷🏻♂️😂 and at the end of it, we listen to it on our phones
@@DannyBligh So there is a difference if we record in 10bit despite the fact that YT will format us to 8bit, from the material I understood that there is not.
I've never heard any viewer say I would have enjoyed the video, but I couldn't since it was shot at 8bit rather then 10bit. Only us camera nerds even care about these things.
"8-bit footage has been around much longer..." Really, well, what was before DigitalBetacam? In the beginning, "digital" meant quality, not affordability.
can i tell the difference between 8 bit and 10? YES, absolutely when im grading my footage and pushing it in post...YES! oh im sorry, you meant can I tell from the images you just showed me.
Well, until recently, I also thought that this discussion is nonsense. Until my client wanted S-LOG 3, on a Sony 8 bit camera, cause that is how he is "used to color grade footage of"... I told him, not a good idea, on this camera (6300). With 8 bit, you really need to get the S-LOG 3 perfectly filmed in camera - talking bout over oder under exposure. He did not listen. I mean, I listened to him. I was "just" the DoP on this one. Well... after he corrected the temperature, added some contrast to his taste, NOISE reduction in Da Vinci, color space transform (to make the S-LOG 3 look "normal"), then added a film look LUT. . . You can imagine how many blocky stuff I have seen on this one. HORRIBLE IMAGE! Conclusion: 1. If you plan to DE-NOISE and film in S-LOG or any LOG, save up and buy a 10 bit camera! You will not regret it later, like I do now. . .
Unless, you film stuff around and just minor adjustments, or probably a lot of black and white footage with a lot of grain and "junkish", old school look, then keep the 8 bit around :)
Absolutely!! With the amount of info in an 8-bit image, you definitely have to get it pretty much perfect in camera. The whole ‘over exposing log’ is a lot more vital in 8bit to be able to get as much data in the shadows where with 10bit you have a lot more room for error but regardless, getting it right in camera and over exposing will always benefit you Thanks for watching
To be honest, it was hard to tell but I was able to tell at the end, slightly. Most people wont give a damn about that. I would probably record in 10 bits on a dark footage, it'll probably help when increasing shadows. Opinions?
I agree! We all get wrapped up in tech and specs. When you last watched a film did you think “jheeeez, this must be 14bit raw shot in 50fps in a full fr….” Because i certainly didn’t 😂 Agree with the shadows and gradient and fringing in the sky and between colours are a biggy between the two. But meh, i prefer 10 bit as i can stretch the colours more too, log is much easier to work with. But before I shot in log, i used 8bit 🤷🏻♂️
10 Bit is better for hard contrasts in sunny day, covered sky and diffuse light give no much advantages to 10 bits. In the past they recorded in studios each channel separately on expensive tape decks with high tape speed, spent hours mixing just to put it on noisy tapes or vinyl who had nice cracks like camp fire
😂😂 yup. Same as when I was at uni for music, we were always taught that you should record at 98khz sample rate, mix with particular things but you end up mixing it down to a 320kbps mp3 and played through an iphone speaker 😂
Nope. Couldn’t tell. Especially on a smart phone. I guess it really depends how the content is being consumed but I think the whole 10 bit vs 8 bit is bullshit. Just RUclips “filmmakers” parroting specs like everyone else.
I'm using a 17" 1080p IPS monitor, watched it at 1080p and couldn't tell the difference. I thought the 8bit camera was 10bit. Really impressed me! As he said, YT compression makes it almost indistinguishable, unless you REALLY push your color grading to extreme levels. That means that for the average YT vlogger a 8Bit camera is completely reasonable, still.
An 8-bit camera is definitely reasonable. I always say in a lot of my camera comparison videos that there isn't really a right or wrong.. Nor is there a PERFECT camera that suits everybody. Gear is important but I think of 'important' being relative. If you are making a simple vlog, sure a phone will probably cut it. Could you make it better by shooting on a RED, absolutely! But it's down to what each user needs. There's some camera brands and cameras that I wouldn't ever use as I don't think they suit my needs, doesn't mean they aren't great cameras! Thanks for watching, both of you
I’VE MADE A MISTAKE! - 8-bit colour isn’t 128 colours, it’s 256. Kids, this is why you should ALWAYS check your work and not do what I do… but regardless, the same principle still applies 👌🏻 thanks for watching. Time to start proofing my work more 😂
Yeah I was actually kinda confused about that.
I was convinced Camera A was 8 bit, it looked less saturated (in bad way) to me. I'll stick to my 8 bit A7c, Thanks for the video! very helpful!!
I could tell the difference but lucky for me I mistook the 8bit for 10bit. 8bit here is lookin great!
Skintone and road colors looks way better in 8 but for unknown reasons
I feel like the differences were huge. You can really see it in the shot of the girls face, skin tones look more natural in cam A. Shadows in cam B have a blue/magenta tint like you said. Cam A overall feels more warm, soft, and has a more natural appealing look.
I think your scene selection in woodland was less challenging that you'd get in some other situations. I'm thinking that smooth color or luminance gradients aren't often found in green foliage, but are sometimes found in cityscapes, sunsets over water etc., and then banding might be more obvious.
If only banding is problem... theoretically that could be done by in post... by simply smoothing our sharp differences between colors. Not sure if that feature exists, but just saying it should be possible logically.
B to me seems to have more dynamic range but it could just be the contrast is higher than Cam A - excited to see the outcome and awesome video = well put together and clear
The stairs was such a good way to explain it! I thought A was 8 bit, but changed my mind with the photo of the sign. I think the difference is so small most people wojldn't notice the difference, and I'm not sure the difference is worth another £1000 to upgrade to the a7iv.
I worked for a company making their social media content from phone footage. The footage was all 8-bit, but it was surprisingly gradable. 8-bit has more flexibility than people give it credit for. I grade and edit in resolve, so I had no issues as long as I used the tools that were colorspace aware. It could even withstand a CST to Arrilog c3.
I picked camera A for 10 bit only because I noticed slight difference in the shots with the leaves. I only recently have cameras that can shoot 10bit and some in raw, but honestly I don’t like to use those features as much because of the massive storage needed for them. I’ve been working with 8bit for years and know how to shoot without having to fix that much in post(where 10 bit and raw come in most useful)
Lightbulb moment! Fantastic description of the difference between 8-bit & 10-bit. The staircase graphic was a stroke of genius. Made perfect sense. Thank you. Waiting for Black Friday to order my A7Siii, but its so hard to wait :-). One month, more or less, to go. Another wonderfully illuminating video Danny. Thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge in such a great way.
Glad it helped your understanding! And it’s a pleasure, I love making these videos as I learn as I make them. I’d never directly compared 8-bit and 10-bit until this, so it’s definitely eye openings as I make these videos. Thank you for watching!
@@DannyBligh yeah having the A7iii and the A7iv shows up a massive difference between the two. Time to sell the A7iii I think and upgrade that to the A7Siii. Thanks again and keep them coming.
I was able to see a little banding for B and also it just looked less like a movie to me. But they were pretty close overall.
Was clear that camera A was 10-bit. I'm looking into 10-bit now because I hear good color grading with Davinci Resolve is only then possible.
Viewing on an iPhone 14 pro at the default setting (480p), they looked indistinguishable. When I bumped the resolution to 2160p I could definitely see the magenta hue, but no way was any banding apparent, even when I magnified to 8x. I had to screenshot the image and zoom right in to one the gaps between tree branches and the sky to see the colour banding. At that magnification the bands in the colour gradations are visible on the left too, but on the right side they’re m ever so slightly more pronounced. That’s what told me the right hand side (B) was 8-bit.
To be honest the magenta hue didn’t tip me off, though it should have as my a7RIV suffers from that, while my a7SIII doesn’t. I can’t wait to find a buyer for the RIV so I can splash out on the RV and the image from both my bodies will match right out of the box 🙂
That one was of the main reasons i moved to the a7rv, between that and the a7siii i’m covered for everything.
Thanks for watching!
How much would you sell your RIV and do you have any lenses you want to sell as well. I’d love to buy them
Sony likely compresses 6K down to 4K to reduce most the banding and gradient issues, at least on older 8-bit Alpha cameras with color-profiles. Also, I’m sure it’s even more reduced if newer Alpha lines provide more than 100mbps (12MB/S) across the buss to SD cards. It’s odd that Sony only allows 100mbps when Panasonic allowed 200mbps on the the GH4 or higher. 100mbps is only 500KB per frame set at 24fps. 24MP is 1-2MB per image when compressed so Sony could have at least given us 200mbps for a full MB per frame of headroom.
if you want to see spesifcly defferent between 8 bit and 10 bit, you should be shoot under or over exposure, from there we know that 10 bit better to save highlight and shadow.
Even youtube already convert the video to 8bit, but i think we still can see which one is 8bit, which one is 10bit. I know you tried to match the both camera, but notice the detail (color of the tree, exposure from sky, skin color changing,...)
I think it depend on situation, with the good lighting, slight color correction and grading will not make the big different. Ofc, with some project that you working with so much lighting, specialy with RGB lighting, 8bit and 10bit will make a big change. But i still prefer shooting with the highest quality you can, you dont know if you really need to fix it in post or not :D
Good video btw, thank you man.
You’re right! There’s definitely some projects you wouldn’t use 8-bit for. Thanks for watching!
you've managed to make color fringing from a clear ungraded 10 and 8 bit videos! wow
Absolutely, I'd never normally go that heavy on a grade though haha! But some people do, and you've got to properly test the two. That's why I included both ungraded and graded
Camera A for me had more details in the darker areas... 10bit definitely
Thanks for the comparison, that's a buf reason i was steering away from the Sony SV1 11
The biggest difference I can see daily is backlight. Like person standing back to the window in sunny day. You can forget about window details while exposing the subject but... Is that really important or just telling the story and quicker workflow? Thats individual.
Thank's for your experience!
Might be wrong, but I think you are missing the main point here. Yes, banding is an issue, and additional compression on RUclips will make it worse anyway. But the main advantage of the 10 bit is how far can you push colors until they start to look all wonky. Therefore, there is a significant difference in possible end result.
Not missed the point at all. Colours fall apart in 8-bit far sooner than 10-bit, they where there's graded and ungraded clips, and the graded clips are heavily graded to try and break the image without being ridiculous. The reason 8-bit colours start to look what you call wonky is because of the lack of information, the lack of colours available, the shadows a lot of the time become super blocky and that's due to the banding which stretching the image causes.
The main advantage is obviously as you say, how far you can push it. And it's the same with 12-bit and 14-bit. But the whole reason for this channel is to go further than what other people explain. I want everybody to go away with more understand of 10-bit is better because 10 is bigger than 8. A lot of RUclips channels say 'WOW It's got 10-bit colour' and a lot of people I meet in person have no idea what 10-bit truly is, other than 'you can stretch the colour further'. So no, didn't miss the point. Just went deeper, way past the point. But appreciate the comment mate!
In general 8-bit's color looks muted compared to 10-bit...based on the difference in size you would think it would be much more noticeable..but it probably depends on how you're viewing the content e.g. Beautiful large OLED Panel vs tiny crappy phone 😂
The display really is where the differences will mostly be visible because those gaps between 8-bit and 10-bit are magnified. I think it’s also all comes down to the algorithm that’s compressing the data in which honestly any external monitor that converts 8-bit across an HDMI output to ProRes will be better than the internal solution in a camera. Regardless, one should simply learn Sonys color profiles and how to use them correctly for a particular scene in which brings me to the fact Sony made Cine and S-LOG variants for a reason. Most use S-LOG 2-3 improperly and should expose using a external monitor with a LUT applied. Otherwise, I think the formula is expose 2-stops over with S-LOG 2 regardless of what the zebras or internal reference states. I have no clue why Sony does not reference read/correctly internally.
I think you tube compression made it easy to recognize,8biyt was bit pixalated, I always look to shadow detail.
great video man, i guessed cam a 8bit. so i got it WRONG! and excellent use of the stairstep analogy for 8-10bit, tha't's the best metaphor i've seen.
Thanks mate! 🤣 hope it helped! Thanks for watching 😂
Two of your videos just popped up and gave me exact answers that I was looking for - great channel man! Just picked up the Sony A7iv and finding the best settings. Cheers!
Amazing!! That’s what I like to hear! Enjoy the a7iv, great camera. Using one today for a wedding, perfect for a lot of things
One can easly distinguish if closly see the leaves color grading in 1st photo
Sorry to be that guy but 8 bit is 256 colors, not 128. Great video anyway! I couldn't see the difference between 8 bit and 10 bit...
How have I missed that?! I’ve totally got this wrong and only realised when you’ve pointed it out. Thanks for doing that 😂 appreciate it!
@@DannyBligh thanks to you for the great video!
Great appreciated, bought a V90 car and switching to 10 bit 4k 422
Enjoy! Thanks for watching!
can u share your camera for slog 3 for indoor & Outdoor
Thanks
after this I can stop thinking about getting a better camera and just focus on using what I have
Same thing. I own a D3200, which is not a camera made for videography and it only does record 1080p@30 with 8Bit, but after seeing this maybe I should focus on mastering photography first before wanting a camera capable of 14Bit RAW. :)
One of the most important things is learning with what you have. But I won't deny, there's a few psychological elements to new gear... New video about that coming VERY Soon! Thanks for watching
@@fusseldieb i shoot with a dD5500! i invest in the motorized slider, weebill S with focus motor, lcd monitor, 35 1.8 and 50 1.8 lenses, variable ND Filter and a 150w led light with a 90cm softbox, its make a world apart! There are very good examples of what your camera is capable of here in YT with shooting video, in 5 years I have realized that what people like is how you tell the story, the editing. Don't fall for the silly marketing game that you use the newest camera to make art. 15 years ago people still produced magnificent cinematographic jewels with more basic cameras...
I am gonna take a wild guess here and say B is 10 bit, at leat up to the image with the sign " This way", when I stopped and wrote this. Let's see if I am right! :) but at 1:30 looks like the camera A is the 10 bit...
The camera also makes a big difference. After watching this, i went to test SLOG2 on my original ZV1 and it's terrible and reminds me of why i don't use it even at 100 Mbps. Too much noise and the minimum ISO of 1000 is not good.
it was absolutely clear with a tonn more colors in camera A the leaves show that very cleary in yellows and also skintones givi that away
First I was like clearly A is 10bit then I forced myself to change my mind XD no idea why, but in the and I guessed it wrong. But there is clearly visible difference. I don't understand how some people can't see it. Probably they just don't know what to look at. The explanation was great, I liked your video a lot, and I wanna work with 10bit :D I just learn color grading now days and I enjoy a lot, and sometimes I feel like I could do a better job with more information. But it is rare at the moment, also davinci asks money if I wanna color grade 10bit footage :D that's holding me back right now the most
Thank you! Glad yo hear that you liked it!
For Sony cameras there’s definitely a colour shift between 8 and 10bit - mo idea why! But you can still colour grade 8-bit to a reasonable way. I’ve always found that 8-bit you have to get at the right exposure to get the most out of it.
Practice with 8, get good and then you can invest in DaVinci to do 10bit ✌🏻
Thanks for watching
very smooth explanation
🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻 thanks
B feels a little bit more crisp and alive than A. A is the eight bit and B is the ten bit. The difference is subtle, but there
So if I'm shooting with PP off, there is no reason to shoot 10-bit, right? Shooting in 100M 8-bit cuts my file sizes by about 30% which I much prefer.
If you have no intension to do any colour correction, sure. I see no harm
subscribed! thanks danny that helped me to FINALLY understand the colour realm of camera science. that’s one i never really understood and it feels so good to level up in my knowledge thanks to the brilliant stair description that you used. did you use a ninja atmos recorder to bring your Siii up to 10 bit? thanks
💪🏻💪🏻 no problem.
No, the Siii can do 10bit internally
thank you for this video, I thought camera B was 10 bit, that means i don't need 10 bit if I can't tell the difference
Yes and no... 10-bit will always be better, if I had a choice I'd always go for 10-bit. However, if you're wanting to make a quick video and colour grading isn't on the agenda, 8-bit is more than acceptable. Thanks for watching!
That was a simple & therefore a powerfull eyeopener... Thanks a bunch 4 it... in my case it Was a notion that B was darker with a HDRish feel to it, while on the other hand A seemed to be more natural looking - I was leaning towards the 10 bit naturalness on the A, but it wasn't a sure bet, cause the HDR hype would suggest that it's actually B that's the picture world New Age :) Well the difference was noticable, but I think the winner would depend strongly on personal preference... One more THX 4 the video 👀
My pleasure!! Thanks for watching and the comment 👌🏻
Got it right in the first 5 seconds honestly. Something about more color information makes it look less "cheap" digital look like mobile phone cameras do. 1080p 10bit or 12 bit 4:4:4/4:2:2 looks miles better to me the 8bit 4k or 8k video.
If WE look to a regular 8bit color monitor, how can we see a difference? :D
thank youuuuu
It’s my pleasure!!
I still say that beyond resolutions, qualities and so on, a good lens is more important.
For me the lens is 60% and the camera 40%.
I’d go even further than that, I always recommend that people invest in the optics more than the camera bodies. You swap bodies every couple of years sometimes but the lenses stay with you for a while
Have to totally disagree on that. Will your lens give you 10-bit, 4k or better dynamic range? Just no.... A shitty camera won't be magicly saved by a good lens. And if for you the lens is more important because of the bokeh or because of more light.... a bit of ISO noise won't kill nobody ;) Peace!
Bokeh can make audience focus on one object. While 12bit 444 6k prores can't.
well done! I love your style!
Thanks Oliver!! Really appreciate you watching!
Those! Those! Thooooose!
If I couldn’t notice the difference I don’t think my client would so am sticking to 8 bits.
Well explained. With a Camera having no 10 bit option. Does picture profiles like slog Hlg etc gives better dynamic range or color (smooth color shift) compare to normal 8bit footage???
Any profile like log will give you better dynamic range. But you’ll see more banding if you use a narrower profile such as S-log 3.
When I owned an A7iii I spent my time filming in cine 4, flatter than normal footage but only just. Also made it easier/faster to grade and correct
@@DannyBligh Thanks! So to be specific- apart from better Dynamic range does any Profile gives smooth color gradient (less color banding) in 8-bit, compared to a normal footage without any picture profile?
Most people don't even look at videos on a decent TV, much less a color calibrated one. They look at it on their phone. As a photographer, I may have a good color calibrated screen but experience has taught me that 99.9% of the people that will be looking at my photos won't. So in the end, how much does it really matter. These days, I just try the get the brightness levels high enough to be screen clearly and I no longer worry about the color because no one cares or can tell this difference anyway. Equipment manufacturers have to come up with new specs every year to convince people to buy new shit :)
Hi, I am using Sony a7s II for almost 8 years now. I was thinking to change to a newer camera like fx30 or a7 iv for 10 bit and s-cinetone. Is it worth changing?
100% worth it. Just the ability to have 10bit but also the colours from the later Sony cameras have evolved so much since the A7Sii. On top of that, you have a huge amount of new features, better autofocus, 4k (with little to no crop on some cameras/modes).
As for which to get, the fx30 is a fantastic camera from what i’ve seen. I don’t own one nor have I used one. But I have used an a7iv, i have a few videos on my channel about it and it’s a great camera
@@DannyBligh Thanks a lot!
Hi. If you can't upload 10bit on YT then how are we supposed to notice the difference? Besides, not everyone has a 10bit monitor.
It’s more down to how it’s captured and giving the the information to edit and effect it, not so much how it’s rendered. It’s a similar principal across many industries.
For instance, a lot of audio in recording studios is recorded at 96Khz as the sample rate, allowing the system to capture anything from 1hz right through to 48Khz. The human ear can only hear between 20hz and 20Khz (and that’s being generous!) but it allows you to control and render it down to what we hear on iTunes 🤷🏻♂️😂 and at the end of it, we listen to it on our phones
@@DannyBligh So there is a difference if we record in 10bit despite the fact that YT will format us to 8bit, from the material I understood that there is not.
difficult on some the a was better on others b. but my conlusion is that B is 10 it is more detailed
I've never heard any viewer say I would have enjoyed the video, but I couldn't since it was shot at 8bit rather then 10bit. Only us camera nerds even care about these things.
😂😂😂 so damn true 😂
What threw me off was skin tones on the 10bit was too green in comparison to the 8bit
How to switch bro 8bit to 10 bit photo mode
There’s no such thing. This is only relevant for video. Photo uses jpg and raw, raw is 14bit when uncompressed and 12bit when compressed
@@DannyBligh but not show my pic in Photoshop to 10 bit
Highlights blow out a little more with 8-bit.
"8-bit footage has been around much longer..."
Really, well, what was before DigitalBetacam?
In the beginning, "digital" meant quality, not affordability.
For some weird reason seems like i preferred the 8 bit over the 10 bit
can i tell the difference between 8 bit and 10? YES, absolutely when im grading my footage and pushing it in post...YES! oh im sorry, you meant can I tell from the images you just showed me.
i'm comparing the footage while youtube is set to 144p
Well, until recently, I also thought that this discussion is nonsense.
Until my client wanted S-LOG 3, on a Sony 8 bit camera, cause that is how he is "used to color grade footage of"...
I told him, not a good idea, on this camera (6300).
With 8 bit, you really need to get the S-LOG 3 perfectly filmed in camera - talking bout over oder under exposure.
He did not listen. I mean, I listened to him. I was "just" the DoP on this one.
Well... after he corrected the temperature, added some contrast to his taste, NOISE reduction in Da Vinci,
color space transform (to make the S-LOG 3 look "normal"), then added a film look LUT. . .
You can imagine how many blocky stuff I have seen on this one.
HORRIBLE IMAGE!
Conclusion:
1. If you plan to DE-NOISE and film in S-LOG or any LOG, save up and buy a 10 bit camera!
You will not regret it later, like I do now. . .
Unless, you film stuff around and just minor adjustments, or probably a lot of black and white footage
with a lot of grain and "junkish", old school look, then keep the 8 bit around :)
And I do not even like color grading that much, I keep it simple.
But, S-LOG ruins the whole game, when in 8 bit.
Absolutely!! With the amount of info in an 8-bit image, you definitely have to get it pretty much perfect in camera. The whole ‘over exposing log’ is a lot more vital in 8bit to be able to get as much data in the shadows where with 10bit you have a lot more room for error but regardless, getting it right in camera and over exposing will always benefit you
Thanks for watching
@@DannyBligh Thanks for sharing!
my computer can't play 4k 10-bit but it plays 4k 8-bit like nothing's wrong.
Yeah, was the same on my old MacBook :/
Camera B have better color, than Camera A.
Interesting!!!
8 bit should not use Slog 3 but slog 2
B
Edit: Bugger, I’ll just blame the monitor 😂
C? 😂
Hahahaha! Damn monitor…
I could not tell the difference on my laptop screen
I couldn't see the difference until the girls nose. I think Cam B was 8 bit. Lets see. Okay i was right but the difference is small.
To be honest, it was hard to tell but I was able to tell at the end, slightly. Most people wont give a damn about that. I would probably record in 10 bits on a dark footage, it'll probably help when increasing shadows. Opinions?
I agree! We all get wrapped up in tech and specs. When you last watched a film did you think “jheeeez, this must be 14bit raw shot in 50fps in a full fr….” Because i certainly didn’t 😂
Agree with the shadows and gradient and fringing in the sky and between colours are a biggy between the two. But meh, i prefer 10 bit as i can stretch the colours more too, log is much easier to work with. But before I shot in log, i used 8bit 🤷🏻♂️
A = 10 bit.
Easy b 8 bit purple tree :)
Absolutely!! It’s so weird how it effects the colour that much though. Thanks for watching
B 10
B 10 bit
A is 10 bit
You skipped through so quickly I didn’t have time to actually choose a winner.
a 8bit b 10bit
I dont care 8bit and 10bit. What i care? Is how to increase my viewers 😂😂
😂😂 don’t we all?!
Try some underwater footage then talk ;)
😂😂😂
I thought cam a was 8 bit
A-8bits B-10 bits IM SUREE
Edit: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
yup 10 bit is nicer
10 Bit is better for hard contrasts in sunny day, covered sky and diffuse light give no much advantages to 10 bits. In the past they recorded in studios each channel separately on expensive tape decks with high tape speed, spent hours mixing just to put it on noisy tapes or vinyl who had nice cracks like camp fire
😂😂 yup. Same as when I was at uni for music, we were always taught that you should record at 98khz sample rate, mix with particular things but you end up mixing it down to a 320kbps mp3 and played through an iphone speaker 😂
B
Nope. Couldn’t tell. Especially on a smart phone. I guess it really depends how the content is being consumed but I think the whole 10 bit vs 8 bit is bullshit. Just RUclips “filmmakers” parroting specs like everyone else.
I'm using a 17" 1080p IPS monitor, watched it at 1080p and couldn't tell the difference. I thought the 8bit camera was 10bit. Really impressed me!
As he said, YT compression makes it almost indistinguishable, unless you REALLY push your color grading to extreme levels.
That means that for the average YT vlogger a 8Bit camera is completely reasonable, still.
An 8-bit camera is definitely reasonable. I always say in a lot of my camera comparison videos that there isn't really a right or wrong.. Nor is there a PERFECT camera that suits everybody. Gear is important but I think of 'important' being relative. If you are making a simple vlog, sure a phone will probably cut it. Could you make it better by shooting on a RED, absolutely! But it's down to what each user needs. There's some camera brands and cameras that I wouldn't ever use as I don't think they suit my needs, doesn't mean they aren't great cameras! Thanks for watching, both of you
A 10 bit
Easy haha A is 8 bit
Hhahahah i thouht the A was 8 bit becaue on the woman, it looks destryed. And B looked natural. So 8 bit then is more than enough