How they found the World's Biggest Prime Number - Numberphile

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • Featuring Matt Parker...
    More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
    See part one at: • New World's Biggest Pr...
    Part three on Numberphile2: • More details about the...
    Matt's interview with Curtis Cooper: • New World-Record Large...
    The previous record: • New Largest Known Prim...
    Mersenne Numbers and Mersenne Primes: • 31 and Mersenne Primes...
    More on Mersenne Primes: • Perfect Numbers and Me...
    GIMPS: www.mersenne.org
    Prime Playlist: bit.ly/primevids
    Support us on Patreon: / numberphile
    NUMBERPHILE
    Website: www.numberphile...
    Numberphile on Facebook: / numberphile
    Numberphile tweets: / numberphile
    Subscribe: bit.ly/Numberph...
    Numberphile is supported by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI): bit.ly/MSRINumb...
    Videos by Brady Haran
    Brady's videos subreddit: / bradyharan
    Brady's latest videos across all channels: www.bradyharanb...
    Sign up for (occasional) emails: eepurl.com/YdjL9
    Numberphile T-Shirts: teespring.com/...
    Other merchandise: store.dftba.co...
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 2,3 тыс.

  • @MrWabadabadoe
    @MrWabadabadoe 8 лет назад +4685

    2 forests where destroyed to make that book

    • @thelatestartosrs
      @thelatestartosrs 8 лет назад +19

      +mrkarlhey not really unless you're really into that stuff and can compare it to other values for random activities

    • @edinburghcopyshop1705
      @edinburghcopyshop1705 8 лет назад +17

      +Wabadabadoe It's only a ream and a half per copy

    • @mahinalam
      @mahinalam 8 лет назад +11

      +mrkarlhey It wasn't found with extremely advanced computers rather 800ish very average computers months.

    • @mahinalam
      @mahinalam 8 лет назад +5

      +mrkarlhey It wasn't found with extremely advanced computers rather 800ish very average computers months.

    • @mahinalam
      @mahinalam 8 лет назад

      +mrkarlhey It wasn't found with extremely advanced computers rather 800ish very average computers months.

  • @harrytsang1501
    @harrytsang1501 8 лет назад +1771

    this number is fabulous in binary

    • @kemkyrk8029
      @kemkyrk8029 8 лет назад +111

      +Harry Tsang Like all Mersenne numbers

    • @REMagic42
      @REMagic42 8 лет назад +63

      +Harry Tsang Yeah, I am so smart that I learned it by heart!

    • @parakmi1
      @parakmi1 8 лет назад +12

      +TheJman0205
      00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110001

    • @AbandonedVoid
      @AbandonedVoid 8 лет назад +3

      01001101 01000100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01010100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01010100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01010100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01010100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01010100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01010100 01000001 01100111 01001101 01000100 01000101 01110111 01001101 01000100 01000001 01111000 01001101 01000100 01000001 01100111

    • @PathOfDamn
      @PathOfDamn 8 лет назад +3

      +Abandoned Void 01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00101100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01000010 01100001 01110011 01100101 00110110 00110100 00101100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01100001 01100111 01100001 01101001 01101110 00101100 00100000 01100101 01101000 00111111 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 01010000 01101111 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101100 01100101 01110011 01110011 00101110 00101110 00101110 00100000 01000010 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01100110 01110101 01101110 00101100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01100111 01110101 01100101 01110011 01110011 00101110

  • @NomTom
    @NomTom 4 года назад +394

    instead of searching for the biggest prime number, I went searching for the smallest. After two years of calculating, my computer finally found it: 2

    • @randomcat5262
      @randomcat5262 2 года назад +47

      try hunting for more even primes

    • @gatlinggun511
      @gatlinggun511 2 года назад +3

      Isn’t one also a prime or is it not considered a prime because it’s also a square

    • @christinebeatrixconsul2031
      @christinebeatrixconsul2031 2 года назад +14

      @@gatlinggun511 1 is not a prime due to the fact that it only has 1 factor. a prime number has 2 factors, 1 and itself

    • @camo5553
      @camo5553 Год назад +21

      @@gatlinggun511 1 isn't considered prime because it would break the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, as they would then have infinite prime factorizations due to being able to have an arbitrary number of ones in the factorization, so we decided to just not include it as prime (among other reasons, but this is a big reason why)

    • @dopesponge8430
      @dopesponge8430 Год назад

      It’s infinity right?

  • @donbasuradenuevo
    @donbasuradenuevo 8 лет назад +802

    Finding the 2^127-1 Lucas number... by hand. Imagine messing up just one freaking number.

    • @ramuk1127
      @ramuk1127 8 лет назад +2

      eZ

    • @conomotoapologize1125
      @conomotoapologize1125 8 лет назад +17

      +donbasuradenuevo Use binomial expansion.

    • @monicarosas264
      @monicarosas264 6 лет назад +16

      3,848,889,888 3,848,889,890
      3,848,888,897
      whoops gotta start over

    • @ahsannadeem346
      @ahsannadeem346 5 лет назад +1

      I predict you just tested 2^7-1 already..
      Didn't u??

    • @MikeRosoftJH
      @MikeRosoftJH 4 года назад +53

      @@monicarosas264 The mathematician William Shanks took 15 years to calculate 707 decimal digits of pi, but he made a mistake at the 528th position.

  • @vinnyoh4274
    @vinnyoh4274 7 лет назад +1287

    Matt: ... I know 5 is a prime number.
    Brady: What??
    Matt: Probably.....
    What a classic Parker Square moment.

  • @12tone
    @12tone 8 лет назад +644

    Any chance we'll get an explanation of why that method works?

    • @LOCKEYJ
      @LOCKEYJ 4 года назад +16

      It’s in the video

    • @eboone
      @eboone 3 года назад +37

      Interesting seeing you here 4 years later

    • @_wetmath_
      @_wetmath_ 3 года назад +8

      @@eboone why is this video suddenly recommended

    • @jakemcmillian
      @jakemcmillian 3 года назад +10

      @@_wetmath_ might be my fault... I was binge watching numberphile a couple weeks ago, found this one and made a few comments on it. From what I could tell, the last reply was a year before my comments. Just a guess though.

    • @diceLibrarian
      @diceLibrarian 3 года назад +8

      Wait *what?!*
      What's my favorite music theorist doing here?!
      Ps. I'm on the spectrum too

  • @TofranBohk
    @TofranBohk 8 лет назад +2782

    I found one! 11 is a prime number!

    • @black_platypus
      @black_platypus 8 лет назад +100

      +t0f0b0 and in binary too^^
      ...and quaternary
      ...and senary
      Cool, works in 4 distinct bases :D
      ...But it's not a Mersenne prime >:(

    • @jordanlynch571
      @jordanlynch571 8 лет назад +30

      +Benjamin Philipp Wouldn't it be prime in an infinite number of distinct bases as 11 would simply whatever base you choose plus 1?

    • @black_platypus
      @black_platypus 8 лет назад +14

      Jordan Lynch
      Of course... :D
      Somehow I was focused on decimal so much that I thought "well, the 'value' of 11 won't change in higher bases" as if it was a distinct digit, making higher bases irrelevant. That's what I meant by "distinct bases": "Eleven is still going to be eleven in bases higher than 10 and will always be a prime" - neglecting the fact that eleven would look like "Ɛ" for example.

    • @tubular618
      @tubular618 7 лет назад +27

      I can count to potato!

    • @nickjimenez9983
      @nickjimenez9983 6 лет назад +37

      11 has four factors:
      1, 2, 5.5, 11
      Trololoollooll jk jk jk jk
      J U S T K I D D I N G
      J US T A B R A N K. P R O

  • @knighty0220
    @knighty0220 8 лет назад +1101

    If you'd figure out a pattern, would you get more money for publishing a prime every month or for publishing the pattern?

    • @flibujo
      @flibujo 7 лет назад +294

      Like pharmaceutical companies. They make less from curing disease than by treating it.

    • @lucasng4712
      @lucasng4712 7 лет назад +106

      Are you the guy who believes the thing that they're withholding cancer cures too?

    • @hyprolxag
      @hyprolxag 7 лет назад +95

      Lucas Ng yes and no. "Yes" is Companies wont produce any product they think unprofitable. if they could, the process would be secret and the ingredients be partly secret too, so we dont know if there was any better way possible. "No" is hardly found a company invest in such researches, investing in cancer research is super risky, so public laboratories run by the goverment will do this job, and yes, they will publish everything.

    • @ervinm.5065
      @ervinm.5065 7 лет назад +48

      publish a prime every month. there will be many more pages each time so it will cost more and more. do not publish the pattern if you're able to find a prime each month or anyone will do it

    • @workhardism
      @workhardism 7 лет назад +71

      A company that had the cure for cancer would make an untold fortune from it and would never withhold it. It wouldn't be relevant to them that other companies would no longer profit from treating the disease. Government agencies are run by people who have a vested interest in keeping their funding going on and on forever. There is much mere accountability in private concerns because you only get paid for what you actually accomplish an what you can market. Public (government) concerns exist to milk more and more research money, which would end as soon as they were to find a cure.

  • @egormatuk3786
    @egormatuk3786 8 лет назад +412

    03:43
    they grow up so fast ;-;

  • @GamesFromSpace
    @GamesFromSpace 8 лет назад +507

    My brain just threw an exception.

    • @TanmayPatil37
      @TanmayPatil37 7 лет назад +52

      I hope you caught it

    • @tubular618
      @tubular618 7 лет назад +25

      You have an exceptional mind.

    • @gooz1691
      @gooz1691 7 лет назад +13

      Don't see how it could've thrown an exception, integer overflow maybe

    • @danjbundrick
      @danjbundrick 7 лет назад +2

      Oh is that what that sound was?

    • @blue9139
      @blue9139 5 лет назад

      All even numbers can't be primes expect 2

  • @DavidRussell323
    @DavidRussell323 8 лет назад +752

    I betcha
    2^(2^74207281 - 1)-1 would work

    • @alandouglas2789
      @alandouglas2789 8 лет назад +2

      Why?

    • @vivafeverfifa2524
      @vivafeverfifa2524 8 лет назад +105

      +Alan Douglas do you have an idea of how big that number is? It's like trillions of digits long (maybe even bigger).

    • @vivafeverfifa2524
      @vivafeverfifa2524 8 лет назад +6

      +Alan Douglas do you have an idea of how big that number is? It's like trillions of digits long (maybe even bigger).

    • @trevorWilkinson
      @trevorWilkinson 8 лет назад +22

      +DavidRussell323 was just thinking that, I wonder if the chances of a 2^Mersenne Prime - 1 are more likely the answer is a prime.

    • @zacchon
      @zacchon 8 лет назад +54

      +VivaFeverFifa 2^74207281-1 contains 22,338,618 digits. 2^10^22,338,618 would be something like 10^22,338,617 digits long.

  • @Abstract_zx
    @Abstract_zx 5 лет назад +56

    fun fact, Prime95, which is the prime finder tool made by GIMPS, is also used as a stress test for CPUs for overclocking

    • @Pedro14ceara
      @Pedro14ceara 2 года назад +5

      Can confirm, I saw a technician test my PC with it.

  • @zeddash.6695
    @zeddash.6695 8 лет назад +804

    Here is a joke.
    The number 5 was a champion at boxing. He lost when he turned into a 6. The reason he started losing was because he wasn't in his prime.

    • @proto9053
      @proto9053 7 лет назад +99

      But he was back at it again when he turned 7.

    • @darraghmckane4016
      @darraghmckane4016 7 лет назад +40

      Zed dash. silly joke when he. was. 6 he was perfect.

    • @nickjimenez9983
      @nickjimenez9983 6 лет назад +14

      Jayden Tan
      It wasn’t a 5-year old 5

    • @NickMC512
      @NickMC512 6 лет назад +2

      Zed dash. This entire thread delivers.

    • @100percentSNAFU
      @100percentSNAFU 6 лет назад +9

      Why is 6 afraid of 7? Because 7 8 9.

  • @clowen00
    @clowen00 8 лет назад +279

    This cant be true! The Google Calculator says this number is Infinity!

    • @belleren9375
      @belleren9375 8 лет назад +18

      Then it's wrong

    •  8 лет назад +55

      +Clowen00 TIL Infinity fits in three volumes.

    • @ramuk1127
      @ramuk1127 8 лет назад +3

      +Belleren savage

    • @adriantaylor753
      @adriantaylor753 8 лет назад +8

      That's only because the number is too big for the calculator to calculate

    • @clowen00
      @clowen00 8 лет назад +10

      Epic Wolf Oh really? That sounds actually plausible, didn't thought about that! ;-)

  • @zioscozio
    @zioscozio 8 лет назад +288

    Could somebody write this prime in base 26 and print it using English alphabet? Would it reveal interesting words? What would be the longest?

    • @keroia
      @keroia 8 лет назад +78

      +scozio Gotta make it base 36.
      Thou has forgotten the numbers.

    • @carlosvargas2907
      @carlosvargas2907 8 лет назад +2

      +Keroia Just encoding

    • @Trooperos90
      @Trooperos90 8 лет назад +37

      +scozio it says 'illuminati'

    • @ilexdiapason
      @ilexdiapason 7 лет назад +52

      scozio it would say "youhaveallbeenfooledforsolongtherealenemyisthemartians7902g4h8kkkkkk1" somewhere in there

    • @doszlopleonard6031
      @doszlopleonard6031 6 лет назад

      scozio base 26?!?!?

  • @thelasttimeitookashowerwas7069
    @thelasttimeitookashowerwas7069 5 лет назад +47

    this is beyond my imagination how they come up with say something like lucas series and check if a number is prime or not from that series...
    props to the legends like these..

  • @samharper5881
    @samharper5881 8 лет назад +334

    lol "the world's". Because it's prime here but on Mars it's actually divisible by 17 and on Neptune it's an even number.

    • @thelatestartosrs
      @thelatestartosrs 8 лет назад +5

      +Sam Harper ?

    • @YourMJK
      @YourMJK 8 лет назад +43

      +Albert Chan
      You are so clueless about how jokes work

    • @Xnoob545
      @Xnoob545 6 лет назад

      I dont unsfdder4y3wfhwhy5

    • @DreckbobBratpfanne
      @DreckbobBratpfanne 6 лет назад

      XD

    • @protonruffy12
      @protonruffy12 5 лет назад +24

      Maybe "the world's" because an alien species couldve found a bigger one already.

  • @Fish-ec8nq
    @Fish-ec8nq 7 лет назад +76

    4:05 He fast forwarded those numbers because he started by saying “2 billion”, not “2 quintillion. Ripparoni

    • @blue9139
      @blue9139 5 лет назад +8

      David -
      Yea prop lol. But saying a quintillion is better

    • @anandsuralkar8376
      @anandsuralkar8376 4 года назад

      @@blue9139 lol

  • @neurospizz75
    @neurospizz75 7 лет назад +97

    if I'm at a restaurant and order a cut of meat, can I use this formula to see if the ribs are prime?

  • @TehDragonGuy
    @TehDragonGuy 8 лет назад +595

    You should mass produce those books. I would legitimately buy them.

    • @DjGreydanus
      @DjGreydanus 8 лет назад +11

      +TehDragonGuy Why?

    • @Justaguy19381
      @Justaguy19381 8 лет назад +62

      +David Greydanus because

    • @allyourcode
      @allyourcode 8 лет назад +30

      +TehDragonGuy What are you going to do when the next largest prime is discovered?

    • @TehDragonGuy
      @TehDragonGuy 8 лет назад +113

      +allyourcode Chop down even more trees.

    • @allyourcode
      @allyourcode 8 лет назад +13

      I want to know how many tons of coal need to be burned for GIMPS to find the next largest prime.

  • @dancrane3807
    @dancrane3807 5 лет назад +5

    1:35, gives away the answer, THEN says "spoiler". That's not the way a spoiler alert works dang you!

  • @Swiftclaw123
    @Swiftclaw123 8 лет назад +133

    Ok but why does this Lucas number prime test work?

    • @sefirotsama
      @sefirotsama 5 лет назад +20

      The real question remains unanswered

    • @050138
      @050138 4 года назад +23

      The proof is beyond the scope of this video

    • @srirachadonut8011
      @srirachadonut8011 4 года назад +27

      Just math. You could ask that question about the simplest algebra and end up in a massive loophole of confusing proofs

    • @martrayleigh7988
      @martrayleigh7988 4 года назад +10

      The one that can answer that is 3blue1brown..

    • @jacobshirley3457
      @jacobshirley3457 4 года назад +25

      @@050138 The proof is left as an exercise to the viewer.

  • @tennisdude52278
    @tennisdude52278 8 лет назад +212

    Can we have another calculator unboxing?

  • @PopeLando
    @PopeLando 6 месяцев назад +2

    2024 I just found out from Veritasium that some Japanese publisher stole Matt's idea and printed out the next two Mersenne Primes as paperback books!😮

  • @Sengial
    @Sengial 8 лет назад +46

    Holy shit that's fucking big

    • @quarkyquasar893
      @quarkyquasar893 8 лет назад +2

      +ytYAEeLxmEYb As compared to infinite...

    • @quarkyquasar893
      @quarkyquasar893 8 лет назад

      Draevon May Well thanks for info but i already know that... :P

    • @quarkyquasar893
      @quarkyquasar893 8 лет назад

      Draevon May XD

    • @gabtype
      @gabtype 8 лет назад

      Devon Langbein guess it does now...

  • @avsn
    @avsn 8 лет назад +112

    Where can i get a copy and how much?

    • @BandidoDescalzo
      @BandidoDescalzo 8 лет назад +152

      +A V Sandi Nack $2^74,207,281 -1 USD

    • @avsn
      @avsn 8 лет назад +5

      +josiah O'Neill smart aleck :)

    • @avsn
      @avsn 8 лет назад +1

      +YipYapYoup I thought your dollars were bimetal. :)

    • @thesimen13
      @thesimen13 8 лет назад

      +A V Sandi Nack commenting for captain

    • @oldcowbb
      @oldcowbb 8 лет назад

      +A V Sandi Nack mathsgear, maybe

  • @neelmodi5791
    @neelmodi5791 8 лет назад +76

    Next largest prime: 2^74207281+1. The proof is left as an exercise to the reader.

    • @daleftuprightatsoldierfield
      @daleftuprightatsoldierfield 7 лет назад +26

      Neel Modi I know for a fact 2^74207281+1 is not prime. It is divisible by 3

    • @void9720
      @void9720 5 лет назад +4

      If 2^74207281-1 is prime, and 2^74207281 is an even number with no factor of 2 - then 2^74207281 must divide by 3.

    • @santhosh_se5476
      @santhosh_se5476 4 года назад

      @@daleftuprightatsoldierfield Ohh man u spoiled his attempt for a joke😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣 Anyway that was perfect ....

    • @sgssergio
      @sgssergio 4 года назад

      Jajja, two year ago discovered other Mersenne prime with more than 24 millons of digit. The gigant Merssenes primes numbers discovered in the last 20 years was a distributed work of millons of personal and server comouter around the world using the Primes95 application conected in the GIMP project.

  • @BigFatCock0
    @BigFatCock0 8 лет назад +2685

    Wrong. The Lucas numbers go 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3.

    • @blinky_52
      @blinky_52 8 лет назад +470

      +Thingsandstuff Now it's 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 7 xD

    • @thelatestartosrs
      @thelatestartosrs 8 лет назад +1

      +Thingsandstuff thanks

    • @DrEvil-uw1ju
      @DrEvil-uw1ju 8 лет назад +70

      +Thingsandstuff No they go: 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, 199, 322, 521, 843, 1364, 2207, 3571, 5778, 9349, 15127, 24476, 39603, 64079, 103682, 167761, 271443, 439204, 710647, 1149851, 1860498, 3010349, 4870847, 7881196, 12752043, 20633239, 33385282

    • @Opaqu.e
      @Opaqu.e 8 лет назад +474

      Was there a joke here I missed?

    • @BigFatCock0
      @BigFatCock0 8 лет назад +397

      +E.B. White George Lucas

  • @johnny5021
    @johnny5021 5 лет назад +7

    I was doing some math and found that (2n)+(n^2)-1 created primes very well if n is even. Example: (2 x 99922222222220)+(99922222222220^2)-1 is prime. I also saw that up to 200 being n (leaving out odd numbers) it spit out a prime 42% of the time.

  • @jblistener7491
    @jblistener7491 8 лет назад +68

    So basically he wants us all to use G.I.M.P.S. so that he can find the really big numbers using PrimeGrid. Well, I won't fall for that trap! :)
    On an unrelated note, was anybody else watching him wave the marker around, and waiting for the moment when he accidentally marked up his new prime number books and lost it on camera?

  • @rikschaaf
    @rikschaaf 8 лет назад +59

    What is the biggest prime for which we know all the previous primes?

    • @janeemmanuel8885
      @janeemmanuel8885 6 лет назад +7

      Rik Schaaf 356787 42157899865323466755443278887765556789000009887665433457788839387474738289254333564215789986532346675544323585858696969699988665323567898531245685652413131453645

    • @sergejkeser7270
      @sergejkeser7270 6 лет назад +182

      @@janeemmanuel8885 I mean, if you are gona smack your head on the keyboard in order to guess an answer to his question, at least make sure it does not end with digit 5 lol

    • @zach7009
      @zach7009 5 лет назад +14

      Sergej - That's hilarious! I love it.

    • @deepghosh7626
      @deepghosh7626 5 лет назад

      @@sergejkeser7270 😂😂

    • @Abstract_zx
      @Abstract_zx 5 лет назад +1

      @@sergejkeser7270 dont forget about the random space 7 digits through

  • @Ultron5068
    @Ultron5068 Год назад +3

    Spoiler: 5 is prime! 😂

  • @99bits46
    @99bits46 7 лет назад +19

    Poor computers

  • @akramfaiza3017
    @akramfaiza3017 6 лет назад +23

    They just found a new one
    (2^77232917)-1

  • @OddtwangofDork
    @OddtwangofDork 8 лет назад +14

    Don't know if the third video will cover this, but - Matt mentions here that we only need look for Mersenne primes (2^p)-1 where p is prime, and we're working our way up through prime values of p to check things. However, we know that Mersenne primes (and the other categories we're hunting for) are only a subset of all primes, so don't we eventually reach a point where we're not certain that the next exponent to check is indeed the next prime?
    For example, if you started only knowing that 2 is prime and that Mersenne primes exist, you'd immediately find that 3, 7 and 127 are prime, but you've already missed 5 and 11 because they're not Mersenne primes, which in turn means you didn't find 31 which is a Mersenne prime.
    I mean, we presumably know the primality of all numbers up to a point a lot greater than 74million, so I may be worrying about a far-future problem here!

    • @KaizokuNiichan
      @KaizokuNiichan 8 лет назад +3

      +Oddtwang of Dork Testing the primality of smaller numbers will take a few seconds at most (probably not even a tenth of a second for a number of the order of a few billion.)

  • @SaraSchenstrom
    @SaraSchenstrom 8 лет назад +56

    The fact that people are so nerdy they do this, and then print it out like it was a book, it makes me ridiculously happy.
    And btw, thank you guys for making videos! I haven't done very advanced math, but through your videos I have been able to at least kind of grasp the idea of some of these amazing things!

  • @nbp2015
    @nbp2015 7 лет назад +24

    Actual title: "The Biggest Number Anyone's Bothered Proving is Prime"

    • @Shyguy5104
      @Shyguy5104 3 года назад +1

      that's a lot of numbers!

    • @trueriver1950
      @trueriver1950 3 месяца назад

      The biggest number SO FAR that anyone's bothered proving is prime. As shown by the fact that this number is nowadays nowhere near the biggest any more

  • @MathBuz
    @MathBuz 5 лет назад +2

    Please provide a reference for your statement “2^127 - 1 is the biggest prime founded by hand”
    I am working as maths teacher.. And I really appreciate your efforts..

  • @rishimilward-bose3544
    @rishimilward-bose3544 8 лет назад +20

    10:45 0.5 X speed, the way he says computers kills me

    • @marinap5345
      @marinap5345 4 года назад +2

      10:46

    • @kathorsees
      @kathorsees 4 года назад +2

      this is hilarious, he sounds absolutely drunk XDDD

    • @gallium-gonzollium
      @gallium-gonzollium 3 года назад

      “for a dAay wE g- gAt sAmthing tOo dOo with oUr côMpüÜtèrs”

  • @SCMabridged
    @SCMabridged 5 лет назад +24

    I'm so conflicted: on one hand, this is so mathematically beautiful; on the other, it's witchcraft!!

  • @aednil
    @aednil 8 лет назад +88

    how long until this number is used in encryption?

    • @TheBalfrog
      @TheBalfrog 8 лет назад +24

      +aednil Considering banks use 2048 bit numbers now and modern computing would take thousands of years to break the discrete logarithm problems, it could be a while!

    • @levolta
      @levolta 8 лет назад +14

      +James Purcell I'm not 100% certain of how encryption works, but iirc, this number is even useless for encryption, because it is so well known. It doesn't sound completely right, but I heard it from various sources.

    • @TheBalfrog
      @TheBalfrog 8 лет назад +15

      levolta The most basic variation is RSA, so in RSA I'd tell you (n,e) = (65,7), e is your encryption component, and n is the product of 2 primes p and q. Obvious with a number this small you can see, p = 13 q = 5.
      Now if you want to find the decryption component, you do e * d = 1 mod (p-1)(q-1) , so 7 * d = 1mod 48. Again as it's a simple example you can spot if d = 7, then 7*7 = 49mod 48 = 1mod 48.
      So if I give you a message say M = 3. 3^e mod n = C your ciphertext. So 3^7 = 2187 = (33*65) + 42 mod 65 = 42mod 65. So after encryption of a message M = 3, we get a ciphertext C = 42.
      If you want to decrypt this, you can do C^d mod n, so 42^7 mod 65 = 3mod 65.
      So a message raised to the power of the encryption component becomes ciphertext. a ciphertext raised to the power of the decryption component is your original message.
      If your primes become huge (Banks use 1024 bit primes), these numbers are crazy big, and it is computationally infeasible to find the primes P and Q if given the product N. If they can't find P and Q they can't find the decryption component and you're messages and bank details ect are safe.
      Because this prime is so large it isn't really an issue, and won't be for a large amount of time. Banks at the moment use two 1024 bit prime numbers, to make a 2048 bit product N, this takes current generation computers millions of years of constant computation to brute force. I doubt banks will ever use a prime this large in security based systems such as RSA.

    • @catStone92
      @catStone92 8 лет назад +1

      +James Purcell what levolta meant is that if you did decide to use this specific prime, people would already know one of the components, so you already have the job done for you, you successfully decrypted an RSA key
      the strength of RSA comes from not being able to find the components in useful time, but if you know one of them, the job is already one, it's a linear operation to find out the other one and you can guess the private key.

    • @TheBalfrog
      @TheBalfrog 8 лет назад +2

      Pedro Gusmão While that is true, banks don't tell you what either of the primes are, if they started using a 44million bit prime people would get suspicious sure, but as more primes are discovered and none mersenne primes are discovered through things like prime grid theoretically a well known prime could be used, but it would be dangerous as you've said

  • @24canidkasi
    @24canidkasi 8 лет назад +76

    Reading that 2^74207281 book would be much more entertaning than reading Twilight.

  • @ApplicationBot
    @ApplicationBot 6 лет назад +28

    they found a new one yesterday

  • @cmopmoemo
    @cmopmoemo 8 лет назад +10

    Could you explain a proof of the test you used?

  • @MeLoonn
    @MeLoonn 8 лет назад +92

    So, is 2 ^"THAT monster prime" -1 also a prime ? XD

    • @yamizetsubou8414
      @yamizetsubou8414 8 лет назад +121

      +Plasma Phi My calculator says "ERROR" so it might be

    • @unvergebeneid
      @unvergebeneid 8 лет назад +16

      +Plasma Phi Can I get back to you on that? ;)

    • @a2aaron
      @a2aaron 8 лет назад +1

      Maybe. 2^n - 1 is prime if n is prime, but if n is prime, 2^n - 1 may be composite

    • @robbieelvin4951
      @robbieelvin4951 8 лет назад +2

      +Plasma Phi It would need to be checked.

    • @funnyids3D
      @funnyids3D 8 лет назад

      +Plasma Phi I was wondering the exact same

  • @christianpoland8573
    @christianpoland8573 8 лет назад +6

    Joined the GIMPS project today, 1.7% done on two exponents!!! I'm feeling lucky :o

  • @ylette
    @ylette 8 лет назад +100

    Wonder what the biggest prime is where all the numbers below it have been checked.

    • @GreatOutdoors1
      @GreatOutdoors1 8 лет назад +18

      they've checked up to around 10^18. I think they've gone a bit further but haven't gotten to 10^19 yet.

    • @jordanlynch571
      @jordanlynch571 8 лет назад +5

      +Cruzer Since doing so is easiest based on a sieve, once you know the list up to that point, the next is easy to find. Too hard to define a specific point for that reason, and thus little reason to even search.

    • @gordontaylor2815
      @gordontaylor2815 8 лет назад +4

      +xunile1 But remember they (Gimps) are only checking one type of prime - there may be other types which haven't been checked up to that range yet.

    • @GreatOutdoors1
      @GreatOutdoors1 8 лет назад +5

      +Gordon Taylor the numbers that GIMPS is searching for are way larger than 10^18, all primes up to 10^18 have been found.

    • @spinn4ntier487
      @spinn4ntier487 7 лет назад

      Cruzer i can check the largest ones conceivable factors
      2=no
      3=no
      6972=no
      We know it is a prime, so we know all of its potential factors aren't it's factors

  •  8 лет назад +5

    What really impresses me is the fact that he decided to print it.

  • @AA-100
    @AA-100 5 лет назад +2

    As of the end of 2018, the largest prime number is 2^82,589,933-1

  • @seanm7445
    @seanm7445 8 лет назад +30

    Any chance of a video on Germain primes?

  • @MoosesValley
    @MoosesValley 2 года назад +7

    Excellent video. So engaging, so informing, so entertaining ! The faces Matt pulls are so funny. In fact, I would put them in the "Flippin' hilarious !" category. And him printing the out the largest prime on 745 pages of paper (double sided) is just such a Matt thing to do. And it is not a waste of paper, he will take these volumes to talks, lectures, meetings, and people will look at them and wonder ... On a quiet Sunday afternoon, he will probably put his favorite math's journal aside and flick through these volumes and smile. (Don't worry, I would as well).

  • @pllplnt
    @pllplnt 8 лет назад +6

    Can you guys make a video about the other competing software? Like the types of primes it finds and how it does it? Sounds interesting!

  • @prae197
    @prae197 8 лет назад +6

    Brady's reaction at 2:01 though

  • @Castelino676
    @Castelino676 8 лет назад +2

    why dont we run an program for 10 years wihile he is trying all the numbers and see what is the biggest number of prime numbers

  • @MrRedskyOK
    @MrRedskyOK 8 лет назад +8

    2^2 - 1 = 3 (prime)
    number in first position = 4 (not divisible by 3)
    what am I doing wrong?

    • @sieevansetiawan4792
      @sieevansetiawan4792 4 года назад

      Marsenne prime: 2^p - 1 where p is prime.

    • @MrRedskyOK
      @MrRedskyOK 4 года назад

      @@sieevansetiawan4792 I can barely remember this, but not sure this answers where I went wrong.

    • @cristiandelvillar3121
      @cristiandelvillar3121 4 года назад

      Sie, Evan Setiawan. 2 is prime.

    • @beneyal9264
      @beneyal9264 3 года назад

      @@sieevansetiawan4792 mersenne*

  • @mahadiqbal3917
    @mahadiqbal3917 5 лет назад +3

    Known to human kind
    But not the actual biggest because there are an infinite amount of primes

  • @Cruuzie
    @Cruuzie 8 лет назад +12

    Matt is so brilliant, gotta love his enthusiasm

    • @banemiladinov8202
      @banemiladinov8202 8 месяцев назад

      He's so brilliant 18 + 29 is fiftyyyyishhh.... ahh 47 !😂😂

  • @j.s.b.6299
    @j.s.b.6299 8 лет назад +13

    I must ask, what is the application of such a large prime? Could it become useful for encryption/decryption on quantum computers?

    • @Rudxain
      @Rudxain 2 года назад

      On quantum, probably not. But for classical, yes, because RSA

  • @sahildalvi6892
    @sahildalvi6892 8 лет назад +3

    a very interesting video...something i didn't know...but something i always wondered how they did it...
    i have 2 questions
    1. what is the mathematical proof that lucas-lehmer sequence filters out prime numbers
    2. what is the use of finding bigger and bigger prime numbers?
    thankyou :-)

  • @fhmxlx9246
    @fhmxlx9246 8 лет назад +5

    not exactly my field, but maths is always mindblowing and interesting, thanks for the great video Numberphile.

  • @Qermaq
    @Qermaq 7 лет назад +9

    So 7 = 2^3 - 1, so the exponent is 3, so subtract 1 to get to the 2nd position for 14. 14 is a multiple of 7, so 7 is definitely prime. I got that. Therefore, 3 = 2^2 - 1, so we go to the 1st position for 4. 4 is not a multiple of 3. So 3 is definitely not prime. What did I do wrong?

    • @chaimmarks2663
      @chaimmarks2663 7 лет назад +1

      Qermaq they are different types of primes.

    • @toanoradian
      @toanoradian 7 лет назад

      3 and 7 are different types of primes? They're both Mersenne, no?

    • @Qermaq
      @Qermaq 7 лет назад

      Plus if they are different, this video did not explain this in the least. It remains that something fishy is going on.

    • @chaimmarks2663
      @chaimmarks2663 7 лет назад

      they mentioned in the end that it's a certain type of prime but they didn't talk about it in length. and yeah 3 is a Mersenne prime but i don't know how to explain it really. anyway it's not fishy lol the worst that happend was a mistake in one place

    • @piguy314159
      @piguy314159 7 лет назад +5

      According to Wikipedia, the proof of the test assumes the power is an ODD prime.

  • @MichealJRoberts
    @MichealJRoberts 8 лет назад +8

    Forgive me, for I am a physicist (impure, impure! the power of christ compels me etc etc). But what is the application for knowing such incredibly large prime numbers. Although I still think it is very, very cool in terms of human knowledge that we know of such large prime numbers...but do they have an real world or theoretical applications?

    • @katzen3314
      @katzen3314 8 лет назад +20

      Impress the aliens.

    • @black_platypus
      @black_platypus 8 лет назад +1

      +Michael Roberts Thumbs up for your introduction :)
      (Not because I would condemn you, I'm not a mathematician, but because I appreciate the humor... Which I've probably completely deflated by elaborating on the sentiment, thus robbing it of its elegance. Please forgive me)

    • @jordanlynch571
      @jordanlynch571 8 лет назад +2

      +Michael Roberts As said in the video, "It's all in the hunt." We don't currently have a use, but perhaps someday, the math behind it looking, a greater undertanding of primes or numbers in general, computational advances, etc. will all have benefited.

    • @katzen3314
      @katzen3314 8 лет назад

      Jordan Lynch I think that massive prime numbers have a few uses already.

    • @ramuk1127
      @ramuk1127 8 лет назад +5

      Mathematics always does this...it does crazy stuff and no one thinks it has any application, and voíla, 40 years later it's the key to success in an incredibly important theory for physics.

  • @sealytheseal111
    @sealytheseal111 4 года назад +1

    The multiple of 8191 that mod 8191 equaled 0 (not very amazing, as this works for any multiple of 8191, I mean the one in the video) is 16382 in case anybody was wondering.

  • @trueriver1950
    @trueriver1950 3 месяца назад +1

    This was the first Y-T video i ever watched, just about in its first week after being posted. Good to see it again in my recommendations 😊
    ...
    ...
    but sadly the thumbnail is no longer accurate 😢

  • @anandsuralkar8376
    @anandsuralkar8376 4 года назад +7

    Takes world biggest prime number .
    Divides it in 3 nearly equal parts🥺🥺
    I know its not three equal parts still thats funny to me

  • @SandraMarkusTrachsel
    @SandraMarkusTrachsel 7 лет назад +3

    Dear Mr. Parker, please allow me to ask you, what is the biggest prime number up to which all previous prime numbers have been found. I assume that the hunt for big primes is leaving huge gaps of undiscovered primes. Thank you very much and best regards, Markus

    • @trueriver1950
      @trueriver1950 3 месяца назад

      Correct:
      We know all the previous primes of various types. For example, whatever the current biggest Mersenne prime is at any time, we likely know all the smaller ones in that series of primes.
      Ditto for any other family of primes (Sophie Germain, etc...)
      What we don't necessarily know is all the primes in between those in the various series of easy-ish primes. We know approximately how many there are in any gap, but without testing exhaustively we never can be sure if we have them all.
      So your question amounts to asking how far has anyone got doing an exhaustive search for primes starting from 2.
      Apols if you already figured that out

  • @JanKentaur
    @JanKentaur 8 лет назад +5

    How about 2^2-1? It does not fit the sequence...

  • @panographic
    @panographic 2 года назад +1

    Frank Nelson Cole was the guy who factored (2^67 - 1) as 193,707,721 × 761,838,257,287. It only took him 3 years of Sundays.

  • @beelzzebub
    @beelzzebub 2 года назад +1

    I discovered the world's largest number, it's called Matt's Number or MN*
    MN* is defined as the largest number found by anyone on earth other than me, plus 1...

  • @brianmckay1256
    @brianmckay1256 8 лет назад +10

    Hi Matt
    Musical Prime
    if you list from 1 to 24 in colums in ms excel, then cary on counting from 25 on the next row down althe way to 48, then continue this patten in rows and columns, all the primes line up, and make interesting patterns. Then is you make every 5 rows a music staff then you can play the prime numbers on a piano keyboard. you can chose how long or short the note is and the tempo of course, It makes your brain hurt but an interesting tune!!!!!!!
    have fun regards
    Brian the novis (just out to have fun)

  • @loudandlearnt1758
    @loudandlearnt1758 7 лет назад +3

    Great video! Prime numbers are so fascinating, I actually made a video proof about how there was no largest. We'll be looking for the next biggest one forever :D

  • @aleb8243
    @aleb8243 8 лет назад +3

    Ryan Lochte explaining prime numbers
    Now I've seen everything

  • @shady8045
    @shady8045 Год назад +1

    update: the largest prime was raised, to 2^(82,589,933 − 1), actually this year interestingly enough

  • @pomegranatechannel
    @pomegranatechannel 8 лет назад +5

    I love this topic. Please make more videos about prime numbers.

  • @WindowsXP_YT
    @WindowsXP_YT 4 года назад +4

    The primes of the form (3^p)-4:
    5, 23, 239, etc.

    • @trueriver1950
      @trueriver1950 3 месяца назад

      The interesting thing about 239 is that it's the only prime number divisible by 239.
      So what, you say?
      Well then, why does everyone keep taking me that 2 is the only prime number: all they mean is that it's the only prime number divisions by 2. But you can say an exactly similar thing about EVERY prime. So what?

    • @WindowsXP_YT
      @WindowsXP_YT 3 месяца назад +1

      @@trueriver1950 There are some other primes of the form x^y-z

  • @josh34578
    @josh34578 8 лет назад +26

    Right, so WHY does the Lucas-Lehmer test work?

  • @NAZEER_._AHMAD
    @NAZEER_._AHMAD 2 года назад +1

    Every prime number satisfy:. ******[(n-2)!-1]÷n=whole number****
    Where:
    n is prime number

  • @NAZEER_._AHMAD
    @NAZEER_._AHMAD 2 года назад +1

    Every prime number satisfy:. ******[(n-2)!-1]÷n=whole number****
    Where:
    n is prime number

  • @IceMetalPunk
    @IceMetalPunk 8 лет назад +5

    Does the computer need gigabits just to store the single number, then, given its massive power of 2?

    • @sjwimmel
      @sjwimmel 8 лет назад

      +IceMetalPunk Well, since in binary the number is just a series of ones (being a power of 2 minus 1), you could also just store the number of ones, which is 74,207,281. That way it takes a lot less space on disk, and when you need to do calculations with it you can simply write that amount of ones to memory (or possibly a slightly more complicated pattern, I don't know how memory handles numbers this large)

    • @skallos_
      @skallos_ 8 лет назад +1

      +IceMetalPunk If you download the prime number as a decimal digit as a .txt format, the file is about 21.7 MB.

    • @IceMetalPunk
      @IceMetalPunk 8 лет назад

      *****
      When written in Word, it's not the same as storing it as an integer. As a string, it takes 1 byte per character. That's not true as an integer. Consider the number 255, which takes 3 bytes as a string ("written in Word"), but only 1 byte as an unsigned integer (or "unsigned char", as it's called when it's only one byte).

    • @IceMetalPunk
      @IceMetalPunk 8 лет назад

      J. van der Linden So then yes, it would need 74,207,281 bits (or 1 less? Numbers this big get my head confused :P ) to actually work with it. So representing the number in isolation would only take 27 bits (log2(74,207,281) ), but in order to do any calculations with it, which is necessary to check its primality, suddenly it takes about 74 gigabits of RAM XD Gotta love maths and great hardware. My laptop has 8GB of RAM, which (if we simplify and assume all of it is available for this number) means it only has 64Gbits...10Gbits less than I'd need for this to work. Of course, a laptop has never been suitable for high-end number crunching anyway...which is why my laptop slows to a crawl when I try to preview Adobe After Effects videos I'm editing...but that's getting onto a tangent :P

    • @htmlguy88
      @htmlguy88 8 лет назад

      +IceMetalPunk actually TF can be done with the exponent, and the largest result before shrinking that you would need is 2p bits of LL + what other than the result is needed.

  • @PeeedaPan
    @PeeedaPan 8 лет назад +4

    I understand that there are these algorithms to figure out if a number is prime, but how do you know that the algorithm will always tell you a number is prime or not?

    • @TheGrundigg
      @TheGrundigg 8 лет назад

      +Derrick Wade yeah, this is just a proven to always be true like many things in maths. You don't have to check every single thing up to infinity, just prove it. And then computers don't make mistakes so it just can roll forever untill they find a better algorythym :)

    • @alexthesaxguy
      @alexthesaxguy 8 лет назад

      I'm sure there are proofs out there that show exactly how the algorithms work. It would be interesting to see the work behind them.

    • @FoxDren
      @FoxDren 8 лет назад +1

      +TheGrundigg actually they do.

    • @Niosus
      @Niosus 8 лет назад +2

      +Derrick Wade First you prove the math, i.e. that it is a correct way to decide primes. That's the hard part. When you turn it into code you also prove that the code obeys the mathematics you proved before. This is not all that hard since the actual algorithm will be fairly simple and the optimizations are usually transparant (--> they only make things run faster, they don't change the behavior of the system or the outcomes)

    • @johnjonsson6864
      @johnjonsson6864 8 лет назад

      +Derrick Wade I guess it has been proved somehow.

  • @PeterAndrewsAltUni
    @PeterAndrewsAltUni 8 лет назад +11

    You guys apparently waste a lot of paper.

    • @physira7551
      @physira7551 8 лет назад +1

      +Peter Andrews so any kind of mathematics is wasting of paper

    • @22NightWing
      @22NightWing 8 лет назад +1

      +Peter Andrews Anything that requires paper wastes a lot of paper.

    • @PeterAndrewsAltUni
      @PeterAndrewsAltUni 8 лет назад

      +physi ra I think you're getting me wrong. I study the sciences and maths at a rather intensive level and I also prefer to use paper. Now that's out of the way, understand that what I mean as wastage of paper is the lot of stuff they write on it in each video. They can provide cuts with Khan Academy style digital derivations and explanations. Explaining stuff like this is wastage of paper.

    • @Dome98Otaku
      @Dome98Otaku 8 лет назад +1

      +Peter Andrews Any kind of resources used on enjoyment can be considered "wasted" according to your definition.

    • @PeterAndrewsAltUni
      @PeterAndrewsAltUni 8 лет назад

      smonk hard no, unless you try to mistake my definition. What I'm saying is that they should use digital methods to explain stuff, and not waste so much paper writing stuff so sparsely. The recreational aspect of mathematics still exists that way, without the apparent wastage of so much paper. I said apparent because I really hope that these guys recycle the paper at the very least.

  • @PC_Simo
    @PC_Simo 2 года назад +1

    *Matt:* ”Well, it’s a computer. It’s got no
    emotions.”
    *Bender:* ”That’s discrimination 😡!”

  • @Dr._Atom
    @Dr._Atom Год назад +1

    As of May 2023, the largest prime number now is 2^82,589,933 - 1

  • @amanduswestin9211
    @amanduswestin9211 8 лет назад +7

    Lol, this prime-search mission actually sounds an awful lot like bitcoin mining :D

  • @omfgmouse
    @omfgmouse 8 лет назад +3

    12:12 Creeper says hi!

  • @Suiryuundan
    @Suiryuundan 8 лет назад +6

    I mean I made a C program but it only goes for like 100000 after that my computer starts making noises... xd

  • @sanketmanna8653
    @sanketmanna8653 3 года назад +1

    He managed to find 126th term of that sequence? What guy Lucas was.....

  • @yashrawat9409
    @yashrawat9409 3 года назад +1

    They found the biggest prime number
    What's that oh ok
    The biggest prime number known to humans

  • @drink__more__water
    @drink__more__water 8 лет назад +30

    I love watching these videos... Even at school the people which are concentrated in maths tend to not actually care about, or get excited by math. It just makes me happy to see someone else smile because of a property of a sequence of numbers...

  • @simonvetter2420
    @simonvetter2420 8 лет назад +4

    not first

    • @givememore4free
      @givememore4free 8 лет назад

      not impressed. next time jump on the video quicker and paste the word FIRST so you can shave off some more time. I don't think your dad will leave you money in the WILL.

    • @simonvetter2420
      @simonvetter2420 8 лет назад

      givememore4free
      Oh, my heartfelt apologies, Sir. And maybe my dad WON'T have to ;-)

  • @Moleda1986
    @Moleda1986 5 лет назад +4

    My math expertise is limited to high school algebra. I was always pretty bad at math. And yet I find your videos so interesting! I could watch them for hours!

  • @justagerman140
    @justagerman140 8 лет назад +8

    I love how the books are printed on brown paper

  • @Gioeufshi
    @Gioeufshi 8 лет назад +1

    So much wasted resources and money. The computers could have contributed to medicine.

  • @HecticHector
    @HecticHector 7 лет назад +1

    I think It's 47 instead of 46....?

  • @jimmyalderson1639
    @jimmyalderson1639 7 лет назад +4

    How do you go from '5 x 2 = 10' to 'therefore 5 is prime'?

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 8 лет назад +3

    Okay y'all. I already posted this in the other video. I think if we all volunteer our computers to run this program, a few thousand of us working together can get Matt his record. All Matt needs to do is provide a link to get the software to run the prime number search program.
    Come on numberphile fans, we can do this!

  • @rishimilward-bose3544
    @rishimilward-bose3544 8 лет назад +5

    9:04 play in 0.5 X speed

  • @JMUDoc
    @JMUDoc 4 года назад +1

    That number has got a carbon footprint thanks to Matt.

  • @mistycremo9301
    @mistycremo9301 8 лет назад +2

    You should do Pascal's triangle and then highlight the multiples of any whole number. Four is my personal favorite, but I only tested 1-5 and with limit space.

  • @tanbirsohail
    @tanbirsohail 8 лет назад +19

    I get cringes and feel extremely uncomfortable hearing the scratching sound marker makes with paper. Please can you use a small whiteboard and an ink sponge wipe/eraser. I love your videos but cant concentrate with that scratching sound every time you write something.

    • @GueVonez
      @GueVonez 8 лет назад +8

      Wat

    • @NoriMori1992
      @NoriMori1992 8 лет назад +12

      They do their best to avoid markers that make annoying sounds on the paper, but it can't always be avoided. The brown paper is the icon of their channel - they're not going to just get rid of it.

    • @nowneothanielverse
      @nowneothanielverse 7 лет назад +2

      Tanbir Sohail the sensation you feel ic caused by the trigger mechanisim of ASMR when you hear a certain sound (for everybody its different) your ASMR
      (Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response)

    • @aarthykanagarajan7912
      @aarthykanagarajan7912 6 лет назад

      Me too, i get goosebumps