Supreme Court says STATES cannot kick FEDERAL candidates off ballot

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 мар 2024
  • www.vondranlegal.com - Business, IP & Civil Litigation. Feel free to share this video.
    SUPREME COURT AGREES 9-0 THAT COLORADO DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO KICK TRUMP, A CANDIDATE FOR FEDERAL OFFICE, OFF THEIR BALLOT.
    In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that states cannot bar federal candidates from the ballot. This ruling came after Colorado attempted to remove President Trump from their ballot. Learn more in this video.
    More Video Resources from Attorney Steve® Legal Side of Politics!
    1. What is a writ of certiorari: • U.S. Supreme Court Wri...
    2. CNN vs. Trump: • CNN v. Trump - Acosta ...
    3. ACLU vs. Trump: • ACLU sues Trump for bl...

Комментарии • 8

  • @luissxmas
    @luissxmas 2 месяца назад +1

    Well explain Sir!

  • @samash1704
    @samash1704 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you for the explanation!

    • @attorneysteve
      @attorneysteve  2 месяца назад +1

      You are very welcome. Law is complicated, but I like to try to make it easy and understandable. Steve

  • @Eva-hh5sz
    @Eva-hh5sz 2 месяца назад +1

    Hello I have to submit a claim for this week to go with the courts and I need your help please let me know when you're free

  • @Gghnbvgtuiiikjjhyggfffdf
    @Gghnbvgtuiiikjjhyggfffdf Месяц назад +1

    Great video, question, my aspen law E&E series “ Conflict of Laws “ book talks a little about “ escape devices “ that the courts sometimes use to get a desired result. First, what’s your understanding of escape devices as I have defined. Secondly, if I’m correct would it be fair to say that the following example is just such a device. E.G. The Judge at the beginning of a 72 hour bench warrant hearing starts off by letting the district attorney speak before stating why the parties are here today and the district attorney switch’s it up, without proper notice, into a resentencing hearing. The court’s actions are within the rule of law but was this an escape device by having the district attorney change up why we are here and the defendant consents to the court’s jurisdiction if they fail to object. True & false left or right, what are your thoughts sir

    • @attorneysteve
      @attorneysteve  Месяц назад

      The phrase often used is "results-oriented jurisprudence." Finding legal ways to reach a desired result. Judges have a lot of power.

  • @Eva-hh5sz
    @Eva-hh5sz 2 месяца назад +1

    Steve can you make a video on civil rights ADA rights under the courts they're not working for me ex justice McCaffrey gained rights to my records permanent guardianship conservatory and supreme court sealed all domesticated violence robbery and burglary. My constitutional rights are sealed I have been compromised and I need your help.how do I fight this