Hell Let Loose - Ranking of Weapons [Update 10]
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- New ranking of weapons for Update 10!
#hellletloose #gameplay #milsim #pcgameplay
Mono's Game Club Podcast:
🎧 Spotify open.spotify.c...
🎞 RUclips / @monosgameclub7907
MERCH STORE: my-store-10056...
Wanna buy Hell Let Loose? If you buy the 🎮 STEAM 🎮 version on www.nexus.gg/m... you HELP SUPPORT the channel! ✔ ✔
💰 Support me on Patreon or become a Member on RUclips!
/ monoespacial
Discord: / discord
Twitch: www.twitch.com/...
Follow me on Twitter: / monoespacial_yt
And also instagram: / monoespacial_yt
The M1A1 Carbine was designed to be a replacement for troops that often just had a pistol like ammo carries, truck drivers, etc. I like the fact they show it's smaller cartridge size through less damage. Good touch.
My only gripe with the M1 carbine is that .30 carbine and 8mm kurz are so ballistically similar that either the M1 carbine should 1 hit kill to 100 or the StG should only 1 hit kill to 50. Probably the latter, considering how ridiculously good the StG 44 is.
@@Nos2113 I totally agree actually! Been rooting for an StG nerf for quite some time. It still, even after all this time, is the weapon to use on Axis. Plus it feels amazing to use so I'll use it regardless but holy shit it's so powerful
@@Nos2113 8 mm kurz is quite a heavy round (same round as the kar98 and mg42) and you cant really compare it with .30 carbine in terms of stopping power.
@@possemis the Kar and the Mg42 use the 8mm Mauser (7,92 × 57mm) compared to the 8mm kurz of the stg (7,92 × 33mm). So yes. The 8 mm kurz is a heavy and powerfull cartrige but it isn't close to being as powerfull as the 8mm Mauser of the Kar or Mg34/42
@@possemis 8mmx33mm (8mm kurz) and 8mm mauser(8mmx57mm) are not the same thing my dummy friend
I feel like everyone ignores that the MG34 has the most ammo on hand out of all MGs. MG42 and 1919 are both 1500 rounds (6 mags). While the MG34 has 2500. Combined with the slower fire rate, I actually prefer it to the MG42 for most suppression roles as it can be more independent from spawns/ammo and keep pressure on a spot much more consistently
The Kar98k/all bolt actions as a whole always had an unintended feature where going out of ads after shooting will make your speed rack the bolt. This made it very appealing to use but sadly they patch it out
They should have never patched it out.
@@monoespacial yeah the bolties are so weak currently literally being outgunned by everything. Devs could at least kept that feature
Didn’t the sniper in saving private Ryan speed rack when he’d take eyes off his scope? Up in the tower before getting blown to hell? He was speed racking it for sure. I think it’s realistic. Bring it back!
I love how when you described the STG you just described the idea of an assault rifle
The Stg might me "the idea of an assault rifle"
@@bigbootybanger exactly
I'm gonna defend the pistols here, I often play recon with my mate, and the number of times the pistol has saved my bacon is immeasurable! We tend to play more of a recon role, than a sniper and spotter role, so I'm always getting myself into situations where the scoped rifle isn't useful.
Well, that they are ranked at the bottom just means every other weapon in the game would be better if you could take it. If you had the choice between two loadouts, one with the scoped rifle + pistol and the other one with scoped rifle + grease gun (for example). It's clear everyone would pick the second one.
@@monoespacial do you have to be a certain level to get the mg itself
@@lewisvaughan2451 you mean the MG42? Each class has its own level structure aside from your character level. Level 3 machine gunner unlocks the 42.
The low stopping power is a real turn off though
One of the things I love about this game is how balanced it is, obviously some guns are better than others but everything can be used very effectively. It makes a big change from most FPS though as things like COD or BF have 100s of guns to choose from but generally only a handful that are any good.
It's the low TTK that does that. When every firearm is deadly, awareness and reaction time matter more than your fire rate and damage. Or as Syndrome would say:
"When everyone's special... no one is."
BF1 is great other than the fact that it take multiple shots to take an enemy down. Especially the required two shots with a BOLT action rifle above center mass... they should at least put a hard-core mode like COD did. But COD sucks.
@@calinschurig3487 i'd say damage doesnt matter, but fire rate - OH YES IT DOES. I can remember lot of moments when i wished i had smg or anything better than bolt action rifle. failing to hit guy in front of me (like 10-20 meters) 5 times feels ridiculous and gives opponent enough time to dodge/spot you and return fire. And i also remember lots of times when i was on the other side, someone failed hitting me multiple times, giving me enough time to spot them (even hidden in some bush) and just return fire with any smg (even blindly) just to hear that lovely 'ding' noise.
Honestly I have to disagree on Battlefield 5, idk about COD but I have used every Weapon in BFV effectively. Sure most weapons are very similar but everyone is good in their own way, most people just tend to stick to the same Weapon and just find their Strategie and just Stick to it. That's why you have that many Type 2 or Suomi guys running around.
The sights on the carbine are the best in the game in my opinion.
They are much nice than the m1garand because of how slim they are, but the reduced damage/kill potential at different ranges makes m1 garand, g43 and svt better from the perspective of being able to kill someone in one shot.
@@luisgiraldo8848 There are certain scenarios where I actually prefer the carbine over the m1. If I'm fighting mostly mid range with some close range engagements. The m1 has too much recoil to aim your follow up shots reliably. The carbine on the other hand hardly moves making double taps at far targets easy and close range engagements you can pick targets off much faster than with the m1.
You nailed it with the whole thing about bolt vs semi/smgs, there's really no reason for anyone to use a rilfe unless for very specific things such as completely open map and stopping power over distance.
The subs are absolutely capable of headshoting anything at almost any distance. For me this is basically bad design, subs should be reliable and outstanding weapons up to 60mts, after that dispersion should make them unreliable enough that you'd be forced to make a concious decision as to what to carry with you.
As it stands now the "skilled" player has no real reason to opt between one of the other.
Well, the "option" becomes stuff like "do I use MP40 and satchel or use the bazooka?". Or being limited to the kar98 if you want to build stuff as engineer or deploy an AT gun. Same for Engineer loadouts. Or Allied Assault. Do I BAR, Thompson or get stuck with Grease Gun BUT GLORIOUS SATCHEL OMG IT'S SO BRIGHT!!!
In real life SMGs will absolutely take someone out even at 100 yards… wikipedia has the REAL TOMMY GUN’s effective range at 150meters and the MP40 had an effective range from 100-200m. The modern day MP5 has the same effective range from about 100-200meters.
I myself own a few firearms and have shot a friend’s P90 PDW (modern Sub machine gun equipment) and 100meters is easy to hit a man sized target in the head and chest region especially when using a rest.
Handguns like the 1911 had an effective range up to 50 meters.
@@monoespacial Allied Assault... I see what you did there :D
@@cramsa
Those effective ranges are done while the firearm is supported and shooting at nice clear targets on a shooting range. The second you shoot the gun unsupported in combat conditions the effective range drops drastically, Smgs are really only good out to around 50 yards in real conditions.
The p90 isn’t really a smg, like you mentioned it’s a PDW which puts the caliber between a pistol and an intermediate (assault rifle) cartridge. So the effective range is a little further and it still only goes out around 200 meters. It’s a weapon designed for 2nd line NATO soldiers to have the ability to penetrate Soviet body armor.
And 50 yards is way to long to be taking shots with a handgun, irl handguns are probably the hardest type of firearm to shoot accurately. If you’ve ever shot one you’d be surprised how easily it is to miss something even 10 yards away. In combat you probably aren’t hitting anything past 20 yards and that’s being generous. It’s why after ww1 the US developed the m1 carbine, mortar men and artillery soldiers were only given 1911s and when someone was shooting you beyond a close quarter distance there was nothing you could do.
I'll take the M1 Grand over any weapon. The shotgun is pretty deadly too and you can kill after 70 m
1:26 Pistols - TIER D
1:47 Bolt Actions - TIER C
3:31 DP-27 - TIER C
4:22 Grease Gun - TIER B
5:29 M1 Carbine - TIER B
6:50 Browning .30 calibre & MG 34 - TIER B
7:37 MP 40 & Thompson - TIER A
8:26 PPSH - TIER A
10:31 BAR - TIER A
11:41 M1 Garand - TIER A
12:27 G43 & SVT-40 - TIER S
13:43 StG 44 - TIER S
15:08 MG 42 - TIER S
Happy to give back with quality videos like this.
Personally, I actually like using the pistols! As MG I find them more versatile at close to mid range since they don’t require mounting to ADS. That said, I completely agree with where they are on the list.
I had to reupload the video because I completely forgot to add a separate section I had already edited for the BAR. (Fachi I blame you)
Also, before anyone asks, the MG42 is ranked where it is because it's the best MG, hands down. It doesn't necesarrily mean it's equal to other weapons of it's tier because MGs are intrinsecally niche weapons.
I think the bar personally for me is a bit of a beast. It acts as a really solid reliable dmr with the capality to panick spray if you have to. But alot of it comes down to it feeling really good for me
DP-27 should be able to be fired without bipod, and the PPSH-41 should have semi auto select fire. (it did have select fire, but maybe the PPSH-41 would be overpowered with that)
Why should the dp be fired without a bipod?
At the end of the day it is mono's opinion about the guns..we all have our own preferences
No! How DARE you have your own opinion!!!!??? IT MAKES ME SO MAD!!! GRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The grease guns ability to headshot is because it's design is based on balance. The fire rate isn't super high, it's more metered,and the damage is balanced. The grease gun is, to me at least, a solid weapon and im glad it got put in, even though it doesn't spit rounds like the Thompson.
G43 is by far my favourite gun. Its a powerhouse
Yup, G43 is awesome.
I use it as a poor man’s sniper rifle at medium ranges… it drops the enemy like a sack of potatoes.
G43 is mega. It makes the officer class incredibly powerful for the Germans!
If the tokarev have better sights it would be right up there too
The grease gun claps due to its ability to stay in the fight longer, just like the stg having a low rate of fire and 30 rounds.
I agreed with you up until the m1 garand. Personally I think it has the best sights in the game, with the exception of scoped weapons of course, especially for hitting moving targets at range. I think it also has the highest velocity of the 3 rifles if I remember correctly, and perhaps I am a little biased because it is my favorite weapon. Im great with the gewer as well, and the svt ranks below those two because of the more busy sight picture for me personally, but with all things it does come down to personal preference as well. Also, mg42 I would put in the a tier. Its situationally good but the problem with it is the same problem with all the other mgs, that they are immobile and tend to get head shotted once in use. Still good list man.
Love the m1 garand as well sooo satisfying
I wish this game had ballistics based on calibers like insurgency sandstorm. Helps with the immersion if you know anything about guns. A BAR should hit just as hard as a Springfield or a garand, because they all use the same cartridge. Same with kar98 and G43 and so on. I get game balancing, but we are already playing a game that sacrifices gameplay for realism.
Idk why but it seems like there way less recoil in this video than what I experience. The garand is almost unusable for me, it kicks so high and getting it back on target is difficult.
whenever I was unlocking my level 6 rifleman, the carbine was the way to go for me. It's just so much better in close quarters than the Garand, and it has so much less recoil to the point where the 2 shot kills don't matter. Just spam it and it's surprisingly effective.
One thing that I appreciate is they didn't go over board with the realistic recoil.
despite the fact that you might be using an inferior gun it doesnt change the fact that it can still be fun to use.
but i find the german counterparts to be the most fun cept for the grease gun because looking at what seems like a pipe that was been welded shut at the back is funny to me
It's so sad viewing this when bolt action rifles was one of the main reasons to start playing this game :D
Bolt make less hit marker on longer range.
Thank you for all the helpfull content you have made. I have lost track on have many videos i have watched. But it have improved my game experience. I'm playing the closed beta on ps5. And its a shame the coms is so poor on consolle players. Maybe possible to find groups of players after the game releases later.
Keep on doing your great work and share your amazing great content with us 😊 it is really a pleasure to watch and learn from you
Don't be sleeping on the grease gun!
From what I've experienced, I would say you're pretty spot on Mono. If they ever added a scope to the StG 44, that would be crazy!
Off topic, I think it would be fun if they let servers do American versus Soviet. Not historically accurate, but Company of Heroes 2 let people do it.
The thing is everyone would use the scope, it would just make it kind of unrealistic imo, as most stg’s used by the germans would’ve just been the standard versions. Just like having drum mags on thompsons
They could create a map somewhere in Germany/(maybe Berlin) for Operation Unthinkable.
I never understood why they make muzzle flash so big in games like if you’ve ever shot a gun in real life even pistols you don’t typically get hardly any muzzle flash and if you do it’s gone so fast you don’t even see it most of the time. In the daytime muzzle flash is almost invisible it’s really only potentially blinding at night. Recoil on a lot of guns is also massively over exaggerated like the ppsh for example the 7.62 Tokarev cartridge has almost no recoil but in game the ppsh always goes everywhere.
Try the one with the stick magazine it has less recoil than the drum.
It doesnt i was talking bullshit
M1 carbine is my favorite, I always end up liking jack of all trades master of none weapons. Never useless in any scenario
actually the 35 mag ppsh is very accurate if you dont zoom in on ads
You think the magazine size really matters? Shouldn't it be the way you fire it?
@@ImperialGit at least it feels to me this way, that the mag ppsh shoots more accurate if you dont hold your breath than the drum ppsh
Lets see how the fg42 and trench gun will rank
Waiting for the devs to release the PPS smg for the soviets...
@@thomaskole9881 yeah, they shouldn't make mag ppsh and make pps instead of this one leaves us between pps and drum ppsh
Probably be extremely powerful especially if there will be a scoped variant
Last Patch they fixed so many bugs with the sniper scope of the FG42 and now it's laser accurate and has no recoil, but sometimes it's not a one shot kill. Still i think the scoped variant is god tier. Don't know about the iron sights on the normal FG42.
I'd have to agree with you here.
STG44 is an absolute beast.
I take it a certain semi-auto rifle was excluded because of its anti-tank status... And the penchant for it's users to literally split enemy players in half like a watermelon :)
The stg was a pretty rare weapon to see in ww2 wasnt mass produced and was only used by top ranking military members
Funnily enough, I play best with a bolt-action since I know I have to make the shots count. With Semi-auto rifles and automatic weapons my aim is a lot more sloppy.
Makes a lot of sense
The Soviet rifle has slow bullet speed even in sniper scoop except the Mosin 1891 and the British long rifle when doing bolt action the sight has most steadily then other bolt action rifle.
3:35 lol I can imagine a soviet soldier saying this
The M1 carbine is beast once you get used to it. The iron sights make headshots so easy and you can spit rounds out as fast as you can pull the trigger but great list👍🏼
Who's got love for the Dp-27! One of my favorite guns in the game
2 years later and we still don’t have select fire for guns that should have it.
I agree with you 100%, Germans really have the best guns while Russians have the worst (except SVT40 ofc).
Wow the enemies from these clips miss shots?!amazing
Would have been really useful to state which class/faction these all came under and maybe a picture of the graphic, the ps5 version at least doesn't give the names in the loadout screen
My guy has background music from "Into The Breach you earned my sub!
Yes! Amazing game! I'm a big FFT fan and Into the Breach is up there with it as one of the best strategy games ever made.
I know this is 2 years old, but what about my trench gun?
I love turning enemies into bloody messes with it.
The nagant revolver belongs to the depths of hades.
Another helpful upload, appreciate the work Mono 🥃
No problem 👍
The ranking is as a whole really solid, only thing is all the rankings are only taking into account 1v1 kills. An officer with the ppsh can suppress half a squad on his own while the rest of the squad get the kills with nagants, each weapon has a use outside of kills but yes this relies on having a squad working together.
The watch is literally S Tier. You can place garrisons with it. Only 0,1% of the HLL Playerbase knows about it.
hard disagree on the DP27.....it's speed of reload is WAY faster than any of the belt fed MG's sights are decent enough for most uses, and mag size is enough for covering fire especially with the quick reloads, great content though
@Parker Dunlop not when you reload at least 2-3x faster than every other MG in the game
I'm with you on that one, I always have tons of fun with it. It's noticeably different from the other MG's but I've not really found it to be worse.
when i first started this game i played only with the bolt actions. not on purpose or anything i just thought that was normal and everyone had bolt actions. yeah I got destroyed
I honestly am better with the bolt actions than I am with any of the smgs
They should take the grease gun out of assault and put the Thompson in, and then have BAR as the primary weapon for the Grenadier class, that would be perfect and better
I'd argue for the dp easy to stay on target good range hip fire is good close range just gotta know how to use it maybe I've just played enough red orchestra and other ww2 with it to feel just at home with it
Buenos vídeo Bro
how ye all doing
My favourites are the M1 Garand, G43 and SVT-40
You forget the Grease gun also has the highest damage and range of the smgs.
I think this is the game when you are an experienced and good player doesnt really matter what primary weapon you are using personally i can manage myself wiht every gun just fine
This is why I leveled Rifleman first - gotta get that third unlock.
German assault is the way. Get G43 to start, then at lv 6 you get G43 and all the nades. I really need to get lv 6 rifleman to unlock G43 for that but lv 9 assault with an MP44 is too tempting.
Go Rifleman/Assault. Get an engineer to drop blueprints. Hammer them into existence. XP FOR DAYS
@@monoespacial Still such a grind for XP in this game. It gets so tiring.
How would you rank the FG42?
Sometimes I like using the bolt action rifles just because of the bolt action itself.
Yes, bolt actions are very satisfying.
+1 for the Into the Breach music
I think the bolt action rifles are boss because most of the fights are between 50 to 200 feet.
Ever ran into a garrison or OP with a bolt action and had the team spawn? Or even just 2 guys?
Also there is literally no advantage for running with a kar98 instead of a G43. Except maybe for bullet drop.
@@monoespacial My apologizes I don’t understand the two questions...
@@Happyland_Motel_Gamer_Cat What I mean is that when you are destroying enemy spawn points, which is something everyone should strive for, the bolt actions are a death sentence.
@@monoespacial Ok I’m on Xbox and I really hope HLL Makes it to Xbox by end of the year because a hardcore WW2 shooter on console is what we need.
@Parker Dunlop it's not just the medics. Riflemen, At players, support players and squad leaders that need smoke grenades all get it depending on the loadout they pick.
I actually used all the weapons and I think by far the S+ would have to be the mp40 at least for console, I have level 10 maxed out assault and although I use the stg anytime I'm on German team I always debate going mp40, am I the only one that uses the stg as a semi from mid to long and auto for only very close quarters? I need to also get used to pistols because they are my least favorite, so much kickback recoil. (I play one console so controlling recoil is a bit more difficult)
I found that the ppsh with the drum is far worse than the stick mag. It has more recoil and feels less accurate for some reason
Used them all my top 3: 1. Shotgun, 2. M1 Grande, 3. MP
G43 is so fun to use, I wish the game had stat tracking to see how many kills I have with that. The plus side of the Garand is that everyone can get one, so a US squad can do some serious mid to long range damage with those.
They really need to fix the recoil on the Carbine and the Grease gun, at present there is zero reason to use them unless you want the engineer satchel or the support with the ammo crates.
Yea the Carbine should be balanced by heavily reduced recoil - which would also make sense given the smaller caliber and damage.
Would be way to OP in my opinion
I would swap the garand with the mg42. Otherwise spot on.
I don't get this comparison to be honest as every weapon is tied to your role in the squad or the faction you are playing. So most of the times you can't choose you weapon anyway and you have to live with it.
Choosing which class to play is a decision mostly informed by weapon choice when it comes down to choosing between stuff like Rifleman, Assault or Automatic Rifleman. Especially when playing Allied, I will often choose rifleman just due to the garand instead of playing Grenadier (Thompson + many grenades) for example.
I dunno why people say they prefer the sights on the G43 over the sights on the M1 Garand. Personally, I prefer the Garand's sights - the G43 sights are so small - its literally like a needle. Garand sights are larger and easier to line up (imo) I do agree that the G43 has a better recoil though.
Man my fave gun the damn m1 garand I tried automatic rifleman but idk that my my baby
Would be cool to see how long it would take for the mg42 to kill a team (50ppl) that is standing in a row. Thought of this when you talked about the mg42 at the end.
Probably as fast as you can swing the mouse from one side to the other of a line of 50 people while still maintaining accuracy.
I disagree about the M1 Carbine. The fact that its a 2 shot further out isnt a big deal to me, it has barely any recoil and Id rather take it over an SMG thats basically useless at range. I cant tell you how many times Ive won fights vs SMGs even after they land a shot on me because I had a rifle and I just one shot them. Then if youre at further range where they have to hit you like 4 times, its a wrap.
I disagree with some of the weapons you call trash lol. Personally I find all weapons are effective it just depends on your play style.
I have the same headshot mystery with the MG-42. It just happens and idk why
Thx mate!
By the way : you can't shoot through the front window of the american truck 0:55
Hands up if you think that US troops should have the M2 Carbine select fire!
It would balance the whole STG44 thing but on the the other end of the battlefield nicely.
The steady thump of the STG44 vs. the M2's 1200rpm can of kickass.
M2s didn't make it to the European battlefield in WWII, but some were fielded at the end of the Pacific Campaign. So maybe it will make an appearance when they release the Japanese expansion.
I dont find the firerate of the MG42 to be that useful. You only get 6 mags, 4 less than the MG34. If you're competent gunner, you will notice running out of ammo early on a good streak. Plus the violent screen shake make bursting mandatory, which is just soo much better on the M1919. I think the MG 42 js just better suited for close support of infantry - not exactly the thing that shuts down a flank for 15 minutes under good conditions
MG42 go BRRRR.
The MG42 is just completely overwhelming when you're on the receiving end. You can even melt a truck that's passing by with a few seconds of hit fire. The volume of fire simply has no comparison. The "bursting mandatory" I really don't get. The screen shake doesn't really matter since you are pumping so many rounds, accuracy is barely a concern.
@@monoespacial The volume if fire is limited then again by a 75/100 round mag (Im not sure). By the same token any MG can rip up passing trucks, which really might be the only time where the MG42's dps comes into play - and then again it maybe amounts to one second difference at max, Ill take that chance. The low mag count on the MG42 is just contradictory to the volume of fire. I much rather have a sustained rate of fire with the 300 to 600 more rounds you get with the M1919 or MG34. With both MGs you can reliably kill at around 150 metres or even more, if one puts the time in. Accuracy is a great concern for me, as I said, Im locking down flanks, not supporting surrounding infantry. The bursting of MGs is official military doctrine and HLL actually is a place where this tactic applies very well. One shot of a rifle completely blurs your vision on a near miss, imagine 3-5 near misses. I dont get the hosing mentality other than in emergencies.
Mg goes brrrrrrrt. DAKKA make me happy.
@@N.Eismann you get 6 mags of 250 rounds each for the MG42. Also, a coordinated squad will have riflemen and/or support players ordered to supply ammo, if not even proactively doing so.
also, to spread some fun: ruclips.net/video/gFLF300I0ps/видео.html
"The bursting of MGs is official military doctrine and HLL actually is a place where this tactic applies very well".
Dude, I don't think you realize bursting is done, amongst other things, to prevent the weapon from overheating. There is no such mechanic in HLL. You can fully control a full auto MG42 with 0 effort in HLL, and running out of bullets is definitely a problem that ranks way lower on the list than "I got headshotted because every weapon is super accurate at any range".
Also, you're way off on the bullets/mag.
Into the Breach soundtrack? Love it.
Yes! Best strategy game after FFT!
Thanks for the list. Please explain footage @14:19. Cheers
1919 mg is much better than mg42 for long range accurate shooting. Mg34 is better for accurate shots too. Mg42 is excellent area denial/suppression weapon, but the game doesn’t give xp for that
imo the thompson is op. I've sniped so many germans from waaaay too far with it. It is an absolute beast
Should have waited for the trench gun 😄
Ranking on console - without mouse - has to come down to user friendly ability to control it. The aiming on HLL is still terrible with a controller on console. Needs a long while to line people up, or get in super close, or use an automatic to spray and pray.
i just run m1 grand , gewer , and the svt40 just cant pass on the 1 tap lol
Best weapon in the game.... the engineers shotgun!
Close range : 😃
Mid range : 🌚
I'm starting to think the MP40 is just the best SMG in the game at first I used to like the thompson and the ppsh more but over time I just really appreciate how good the MP40 is at range and most of the engagements you participate in with smg's usually are at the 50-100 meter mark. I didn't see you rate the sniper rifles or the FG-42 in this video though. I was excited when I unlocked the FG42 it's a really cool fun weapon I don't think it's as good as the STG44 but it's up there.
What I don't get is why they show the MG42 and 34 with a 50 round drum, but it has way more ammo than that in game. They should give it a different model or nerf it.
75 round
I can use any weapon to headshot a guy at 200m with one bullet
I really enjoyed this video!
I need to defend the browning though!
Mag cap accuracy at long ranges it belongs in A tier :)
should add the maxim as a deployable gun by the engineer
You can see in the roadmap that they will add deployable heavy machine guns
@@sweetkiller9696 oh cool thanks must've missed it when i looked
@@callum105 no problem just search for the 2021/2022 roadmap of hll the brits should also come to the game
Are you certain that a G43 has the same stopping power as a Kar98k? I assumed the Kar98k has a longer 1 shot kill range.
I thought so too, but no, they are the same
@@monoespacial That's a bummer imo. I LOVE the k98k, after truly hating it at the beginning. Did you test out how long the one shot kill range to the body is?
@@patrickbateman7444 Hey Patrick! I was your SL on Kursk on the server exodus yesterday , funny to see you again!
What about FG-42? I enjoy it very much.
I have tried so hard to get used to the stg but my accuracy with it is just comical.
Im pretty sure the G43 is not a 1SK at 200m.
The first assault rifle fielded and used in combat is one of the best weapons in the game? Who knew? Great video though
I quite like the stg, to one tap ennemy at range its not that bad
the issue with the MG-42 is the noise
I think the bullet damage needs to be more hardcore. At 50-100m what caliber would you be willing to stand down range in front of? Stop nerfing guns in the game.
How dare you talk about the DP--27 like that. You take it back immediately
Bold rifles can be very effective for sniping and guerilla. Its so hard to spot a well hidden enemy.
Bold rifles are better than italic rifles for sure