It is important to note that present-day bio-behavioral explanations for learning and motivation posit unitary neurological processes for all types of conditioning, as distinctive intrinsic and extrinsic motivation properties are inferences from social psychological experiments, and are NOT derived from the neuroscience of motivation, which does not support this distinction. It follows also that there are no ‘extrinsic’ and ‘intrinsic’ motivating processes, as all learning and motivation follows unitary rules. This casts into doubt much of the controversy between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, as they reflect the same neurological processes. For more information on ‘unified reinforcement principles’ and their procedural and philosophical implications please see the attached open-source book on motivation, as well as well as an academic article on the development of unitary motivational concepts in neuroscience by the distinguished neuroscientist Kent Berridge. Also linked below is the Cameron and Pierce summary of social psychological research that disputes the intrinsic motivation hypothesis. www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature Cameron and Pierce rebuttal to Deci/Ryan perspective on intrinsic motivation web.cortland.edu/andersmd/psy501/intrinsic.pdf An academic account of the development of bio-behavioral incentive motivation theory- Berridge lsa.umich.edu/psych/research&labs/berridge/publications/Berridge2001Rewardlearningchapter.pdf Berridge Lab, University of Michigan sites.lsa.umich.edu/berridge-lab/
Great work with the textbook definitions!! Thank you !! :))
music is so loud not able to hear, unfortunately. But, thanks for the effort
It is important to note that present-day bio-behavioral explanations for learning and motivation posit unitary neurological processes for all types of conditioning, as distinctive intrinsic and extrinsic motivation properties are inferences from social psychological experiments, and are NOT derived from the neuroscience of motivation, which does not support this distinction. It follows also that there are no ‘extrinsic’ and ‘intrinsic’ motivating processes, as all learning and motivation follows unitary rules. This casts into doubt much of the controversy between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, as they reflect the same neurological processes.
For more information on ‘unified reinforcement principles’ and their procedural and philosophical implications please see the attached open-source book on motivation, as well as well as an academic article on the development of unitary motivational concepts in neuroscience by the distinguished neuroscientist Kent Berridge. Also linked below is the Cameron and Pierce summary of social psychological research that disputes the intrinsic motivation hypothesis.
www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature
Cameron and Pierce rebuttal to Deci/Ryan perspective on intrinsic motivation
web.cortland.edu/andersmd/psy501/intrinsic.pdf
An academic account of the development of bio-behavioral incentive motivation theory- Berridge
lsa.umich.edu/psych/research&labs/berridge/publications/Berridge2001Rewardlearningchapter.pdf
Berridge Lab, University of Michigan sites.lsa.umich.edu/berridge-lab/
Very good video
Great video! watched whilst revising for upcoming exams! :)
Good content bt next time please do it without background music. Really distracting