Ty Cobb explains why he was ‘disappointed’ with Sotomayor’s dissent
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июн 2024
- Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb and legal scholar Laurence Tribe speak with CNN’s Erica Hill after the Supreme Court’s decision to grant Donald Trump partial immunity from special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion case.
#CNN #news
Want to stay up to date on the day’s top stories? Sign up for CNN’s 5 Things newsletter, and we’ll give you the 5 biggest stories you need to know, videos people are watching, and more!
Sign up here: www.cnn.com/newsletters/5-thi...
The Supreme Court is supposed to be responsible for determining if a law is Constitutional NOT creating new laws.
The Constitution does NOT give any immunity to the President!
So then why do police officer have immunity?
How many police officers have been jailed?
@@treeofliberty5611They don't.
@@naimahyaraMore than I can think.
Yes, it does. Go read Article 2.
Biden is free to use this ruling immediately too.
But he won’t because dems are cowards
lol to do what exactly?
jail trump before elections
It doesn't work that way for Democrats. They are held to higher standards
@@Jack-bk6wv - Apparently, with the full affirmation and blessing of a super majority ruling by SCOTUS, anything he damn well pleases.
The reality is that Sotomayor has more information about the thinking of the other justices than Ty Cobb does. So I am going to take her warnings seriously.
Ty Cobb is a disappointment.
No doubt.
Lmao he lied for years on this case
In that case, ah'm watchin the video!
Cobb lectures Sotomeyer that the Supreme Court can't make result oriented rulings? What? How is this specific to any result regarding Trump or any particular result related to him or anyone else? He wants specifics? The seal team six example was already argued in the lower level courts ad nauseum and the supreme court Maga justices ignored it. Ty Cobb has no argument to rebut why there is any judicial review possible of a president as commander in chief using the military to assasinate domestic political rivals he believes threaten US security.
And, apparently, a misogynist!
He was disappointed by Sotomayor, but not enraged with the right-wing Supreme Court's decision? You're kidding?
Her argument - whether you agree with it or not - was hysterical rather than logical.
Or else it was intended as a wink-wink to Joe that "hey! a President can in his official actions meet with the CIA and order a hit on a political opponent! Even perhaps an orange political opponent...and just take him out in order to protect Democracy...and the President would be totally immune.. immune, immune, immune."
But Joe is too sleepy to meet with the CIA...other than to briefly regale them with stories of how he finished at the top of his law class...
@@UnstuckMind so then you are OK to charge Obama with murder of American citizens???
All said and done, he was a Trump lawyer. What do you expect?
I wonder if you people need a Xanax or something. The court is not "right wing" - it is majority "constitutionalists" instead of "judicial activists", which is what the dissenters are.
@@indranidasgupta8982
What country are you from?
If one had been paying attention, one would expect hostility towards T.
Cobb mansplaining to Sotomayor is laughable and then calling her “hysterical” is rich… this man represented Trump and helped him not face accountability..
You mean , he was a ...... Lawer????
@@joeshmo6321 I'm a lawyer and that is a stupid comment. Lawyers are not sexist boors as a feature of the occupation. Grow up.
Of all the TV legal experts, Cobb has been most accurate in predictions.
the term "hystercal" was created to keep women quiet and then placed in institutions
@@ddcarroll3392
If that's true, then read the opinion and notice it doesn't do any of the horribles SotoMayor claims it does. The courts will decide whether the act(s) is official before another opposition candidate is put through the ringer by a future administration. That's all it does.
Despite the constant statements about the importance of making this a case for the ages, it was rather finely pounted to protect one and only one president.
Barry did far more f'd things my friend.
@@uio890138 horseshit. Trump did everything Obama did with drone strikes and the like, which is the only plausible thing you have against Obama…..and far, far, more.
Yes, for instance the drone deaths. I think that was the specific point.
@@JScox Then they should have filed a case against Obama, and let him explain why he did it. They didn't because they know he could explain it. The Supreme Court has fixed it so that now POTUS doesn't even have to explain why he broke the law. Tailor made for Trump.
@@MrMleewilson they didnt because you don't file cases against a president for doing their job. you don't weaponize the legal system against your political opponents otherwise the systems starts to fall apart.
Ty Cobb played the hysterical woman card on Sotomayor. She was telling us straight up what the decision means.
Of course he did. He is misogynist, just like his old boss.
But didn’t tell us why. Just cried about it
Calling a spade a spade. Don’t see an issue with it.
are you a dem ? sotomayor still is one, thinks like one acts like one, she was supposed to leave her politic at the door
A president has no authority to call for the assasination of an opponent. So he wouldn't have Immunity to do it. Definitely fear mongering.
This Supreme Court ruling really puts the recent debate in context. Now more than ever the American people need to put more stock in the moral character of its presidential candidate over other considerations. So to give props to a convicted felon because he is more energetic is not the move.
And that energy is coming from a little pharmaceutical help, his legal speed: Adderall.
This "convicted felon" tagline doesn't hit like you think it does. 34 incorrect ledger entries is not something I worry too much about.
@@victoriapowell7170 Just some standard white collar crime, eh? How about, besides violating campaign financing laws, it was done to influence a presidential election by withholding from the public the fact that the candidate had coitus with an adult film actress (who was not Melania) while Mel was having his baby. The acts were planned and felonious. Ick.
Hysterical? No analysis? There’s no analysis needed for the absurd majority decision! Sotomayor stated her dissent loud and clear. These people with their racist and sexist bias kills me. Cobb has no idea of his implicit bias with regard to Justice Sotomayor. Thank you Professor Tribe!
Just paging through her dissent she gave plenty of analysis. Who knows why he said what he did.
Cobb................SCJ Sotomayor response was undeniably not hysterical but forceful and assertive. You used a derogatory term'"""""""" hysterical"""" to ridicule women. But deep down you Know that you are soltanto un Abisso di Nullita.
"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. Thomas Jefferson
Hence January 6th, 2021.
wrong. women are not hysterical when they point out the hypocrisy of MEN.
Women, men again. Provide analysis not lazy claims
Gender? Ha.
This
But what is a woman tho?
Or - wrong - men can also sound hysterical. However, in this case the dissent was ridiculous.
Just remember ''Crimes are being committed by the people who wrote the Laws not the people who break them''
For those of you who don't think this is serious and could seriously hurt our Democracy will have a rude awakening.
you want obama and Biden in prison? we should get rid of speech and debate while we at it..that's alot of democrats about to go to prison for a fake Russian hoax
I think the far ruder awakening will be for those who ally with Trump and then end up as scapegoats for his failures or having to pay when he feels their transactions with him aren't to his benefit anymore.
This is a dictators charter.
Time to prosecute Obama, Bill, Bush, Pence, Hillary.......
@@1ronin907 apparently it is now impossible to prosecute Obama, Bill, or the Shrub, or are you not understanding what happened.
I agree with SCJ Sotomayor! What a disturbing and hysterical ruling. I also agree 100% with Laurence Tribe and respect his legal chops! The SC needs reform and today was the proof.
The house and senate need to be reformed as well.
...
Actually, let's face it people...
The constitution is almost 250 years old as is the core structure of the US political system. It is not up to date and a few hard fought patches here and there won't save anything but the wealth of those in power.
Remember, remember the 5th of November.
Vote blue 💙 🎉
@@troutman-sw9qc vote for the walking cadavver. he is still good for conssumption. ignore the exppiry stamp.
I think the Supreme Court just handed Biden the election bec if this decision doesn't wake people up, nothing will. And they're already waking up PISSED.
@@ronalddrumpf7126 you mean Guy Fawkes Day?
Professor Tribe glaringly OUTSHINES Ty. Not even close.
What a sleeze
Oh Gawd yes.
Justice Roberts more like an F grade for starting to dismantle our democracy.
Cobb is a political hack and he knows it.
Word.
So the deal is going to be, "Call the witness, but do not admit the evidence they bring." Goodbye, America.
Ty Cobb’s disappointed with the DISSENT?
Perhaps off-brand Gandalf should find a new profession.
Dude just trying to not get wacked if immune trump gets back in office
Mustache wax salesman?
@@paulnicholson1906 it's a mask, a pretension, there to distract from his personality and character.
totally agree.
100% Saruman...Sharkey really
I am embarrassed to be an American. We are seriously in trouble.
We have been in trouble for a while now. Are you just walking up? However, I feel sure the trouble YOU see is not the trouble WE have been seeing for quite some time now. The institutional capture of this country by those who want to tear it down.
...as Cobb, sensing a change in the zeitgeist, slowly takes baby groveling steps to inch his way back into trump's good graces
Ty Cobb batting for the other side, again.
#Felonious45 🤥
And Barr is applauding the SC ruling on FOX. He must be afraid of Bannon's barks the last two days before they handed him a bar of soap today or is he schmoozing his way into a potential justice position if Biden won't accept the crown.
@@daviegriffin3539 Oooh. A baseball metaphor. Well played, my friend
Yup...I see it.
This is just what Barr did. Roaches after Nuclear annihilation...
Yeah, sure, Sotomayor's dissent seemed to use examples that were extreme.... until those examples *aren't extreme.* Have those justices been living under a rock? It would've seemed "extreme" just a few years ago to imagine that the Supreme Court would need to safeguard against a president using his powers to rally a mob to incite an insurrection at the Capitol of the U.S. Congress... *but then it happened.*
It would've seemed "extreme" just a few years ago to imagine that the Supreme Court would need to safeguard against a president using his powers to conspire to attempt to send fraudulent electors to subvert a U.S. election... *but then it happened.*
It would've seemed "extreme" just a few years ago to imagine that the Supreme Court would need to safeguard against a president using his powers to attempt to bring harm to a political candidate... *do not DARE think that 'that' is not possible of happening.*
There was no "insurrection" - more HYSTERICAL word salad.
@@victoriapowell7170 You spelled "HISTORICAL" wrong. But yes, you're correct: the _history_ of the *insurrection* on Jan 6 is the history of what happened
Sotomayor literally wrote many examples on the history of the constitution and reasoning on why she dissented. Yet this man says that there was nothing there. Clearly he didn’t read the dissent.
She just ranted . A president can’t just use seal team 6 to kill an opponent just as he can’t use a private Assassin. The act have to be legal presidential act .
@@goodlookingman4489 now they can. He just have to talk to the CIA as an official act. He could order and opponent poisoned as an official act. He can also threatened an official with jail time if they don’t do what he wants…talking to them is an official act therefore inmune.
@@goodlookingman4489 just look at Russia. Our presidents have no less immunity than Putin.
@@Yilver499 they are illegal acts and and anyone he commands to commit these illegal acts are not covered by immunity so would more than likely resign rather than commit a crime that lands them with life in prison.
@@goodlookingman4489 if it’s a federal crime the president can pardon them. Time will tell how bad this decision is.
Thomas Paine:
"For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be King; and there ought to be no other."
No six headed emperor of the USA, impeach the extreme court!
Ty Cobb- I guess it's off-season for mall Santas.
😂😂😂😂😂
You were praising him as the most knowledgeable lawyer in modern day history when he was critical of Trump. What changed?
🤣 he said it's hard out here...nobody goes to the mall anymore...
i think people in America are referring back to the 1700’s when they say “king” or royalty. that’s what our founders didn’t want & made a new government because they didn’t like how the king had all power over everything & could be as corrupt as he wanted. that’s what they mean.
Thomas Paine:
"For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be King; and there ought to be no other."
of course - basically the entire purpose for creating this country
King George has less power than the presidency. He was subject to the law. This was based on Magna Carta in 1215 and confirmed in the trial and execution of King Charles the first in 1649. The president now has the power of Louis the 14th and 16th of France who were absolute monarchs. Also Tsar Nicolas of Russia.
You Americans are so ingrained in your own propaganda. The US separated from a constitutional monarchy not an absolute King. The colonists originally wanted representatives in parliament but didn’t want to pay taxes and levies for Indian wars fought on their behalf.
The separation of powers is exactly what she was addressing. This decision does not really do anything to the idea that there are different situations where a president can claim immunity (i.e. official acts vs unofficial acts) but what it does is create a situation where the "official acts" are greatly expanded, by injecting ambiguity and not allowing evidence or motivation when determining what was an official act vs an unofficial act.
Did he say "hysterical?" Would he have said that about a male justice?
Kudos to Professor Tribe to calling out Cobb!!!
You people are idiots. You seriously are.
Dear Jesus, cleanse us of all lies.
"No soldier died under my watch!"-Lyen Biden
If ignorance is bliss, then you’re running on all cylinders!
@@civilization57 AT least he didn't massively escalate wars as Trump did causing *skyrocketing casualties*. Trump also came close to starting catastrophic new wars, his team had to stop him, then he fired them ! nice guy. source: center for Int'l Policy
No doubt Trumps Afghan classified military secret docs were given to the teliban and thats why they were attacked at the rescue site, ever think about that !!! Get educated on your idol !
This is only just the beginning.
Jesus? The guy who wants us to murder gay people and stone women to death? Last time that god cleansed the Earth, a flood drowned every child and puppy. I wouldn't trust that psycho if I were you
Trump asked "Where is my Roy Cohn?" He found six replacements.
And over 70 years after the fact...McCarthy was phukin right!!
Has everyone's brains gone to mush? By denying evidence under official acts for non official crimes in effect makes any criminal prosecution for non official acts a non starter.
3 of the 4 women on the court dissented. The rest were 5 men who did not dissent. That's telling.
The “extraordinary rule has no basis in law,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a scathing 29-page dissent that was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson
Sotomayor wrote 29 of the 119 pages!! She gets it, man!
Then why does't the senate and house step in ? Only they can write law.?
Yes Liberal women are dumb
I heard that Coney-Barrett had some exception to the majority opinion, but signed on anyway.
Chatgpt:
In summary, while the need for a president to act boldly and without fear is a valid concern, it must be balanced with the principles of accountability and the rule of law. Immunity for official acts can protect the president from frivolous lawsuits and undue legal pressures, but extending this immunity to cover criminal acts, even after leaving office, would be controversial and could erode the fundamental principles of justice and democracy.
I really didn't want to move out of USA
I thought you already moved to Canada after Trump destroyed Hilary?
...and we all know you won't.
After DT wins his 3rd term, will you move to Canada again?
We are preparing to leave as of today we know what's happening in this country!
@@snnetteachexnayder63 Bye Felicia.....
I agree with Lawrence Tribe.
Wtf has happened to CNN having Ty Cobb on first and then using this fool as a tagline? This is the darkest day in American political history!
Joe Biden should march the Army on Mara lago just to check it out
Ok. Then you get a war. Is that what you really want?
I was thinking something a little less direct. How about taking all the SCJ and forcing them to stay in a federal building for a week with no means of raising a flag. Just keep them there, let them go, and they will know they have no power to respond to the act.
Thing is, Biden is an ethical man, so he isn't inclined to do crimes on his own, and needing immunity.
Mr. Chief Justice and colleagues, do enlighten us on what substantive meaning is left in the presidential oath, and in the Take Care Clause of Article II.
Ty Cobbs word "HYSTERICAL" was definitely sexist and demeaning!! Im so glad Lawrence Tribe said it!!
Yeah
How offensive!
Why is CNN still paying this tedious Trump lawyer for his biased and dangerous opinions?
CNN: Answer this question!
You should be onto to them and their new master he is a tRump supporter.
Did you ever think cnn was on your side
Cnn will pay anyone who will oppose Trump on their segments - pathetic
They’ve been gulled into it by all the accusations of bias, but it is just tired both-siderism. And it just plays into the normalization of Trump.
No one is worried what his opinion is.
I agree wholeheartedly!
Cobb - irrelevant!!
@@QuantumOfSolace1lol according to CNN he is not.
Word.
He would give his former student John Roberts a B-minus? How about a D-minus?
They gave a guy, in a country where no one is supposed to be above the law, immunity from prosecution for official acts, making that guy above the law. Conclusion they COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY FAILED and a D- is still to good.
Presidential Immunity will drive us into territory that we can never recover from.
CNN: thank you for having Laurence Tribe as a guest. More of him, please. 🙏 also, Jon Meacham, please. 🙏
Lmao that dude is a liberal activist
@@Ohreallybro95 he’s the Harvard law professor 🤦♂️ god you maga types are idiots
Love to see what Luttig has to say
There should be term limits for the Supreme Court Justice System.
💯
there are, life time terms. it's to allow them to make decisions based upon the Constitution and the cases merits rather than the heat and passion of the dumb masses of the day.
But not for old hags like Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters?
But not for old hags like Nancy and Maxine?
If there was they would be as corrupt as co gress.
Its like taking the checks off of extreme power. What human would honestly not be tempted by it?
We better put the power back into the hands of the people while we still can.
This is not correct, this is not democratic
Remember when the rule of law was law.
Yeah, before TRump I believe it existed which was about a decade ago!
Yeah… _that was the good ole days!_
It NEVER was for a US President...
I challenge anyone to name a time when a US President has been criminally liable for their crimes.
They've always been protected, regardless of the crime
Remember when biden got 50 million votes? Usa is stupid
Do you think Obama should receive immunity for drone striking Americans?
Powers cannot be considered separate only when the court agrees with the underlying action.
Did you quote that dribble from Tikok? Aren't your a little old for tiktok?
Yeh I have no idea what he is trying to say. Maybe stick to taking photos, you seem to lack any intelligence to form a coherent sentence.
Just because you don’t understand it, makes you the fool. ⬆️
The separation of powers is meant to ensure a *balance* between them. People think the POTUS is in charge, but he's only in charge of the executive branch. Checks and balances. We know the current performative Congress won't hold a GQP POTUS accountable for his actions. Now the SC has said they won't either.
The system has worked so far because it was never about ONE MAN but they made it that way.. stupid, stupid, stupid.
Thanks for pointing out the “hysterical” sexist comment.
John Roberts insinuated the same.
Trump vs our Constitution. Pick a side.
Trump...He is the only one who will hold up the Constitution...The Biden Administration is destroying it.
Trump is the one defending the constitution.
I've picked Democracy and Constitution over MAGA SCOTUS AND GOP WHO ARE SELLING OUT OUR COUNTRY FOR PROJECT 2025! VOTE BLUE💙Federally and Locally our Democracy and Constitution depend on it!💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
Don't say "our" say "your"
The Constitution. Everyday and twice on Sunday. Democracy over Autocracy 🇺🇸💙
And as for this guy 👆🏾 ignore his baseless post. It's BS and obvious projection. Trump is destroying The Constitution. Biden is upholding it.
Justice Clarence Thomas didn't get it wrong, he did what he was paid to do
Yes, to interpret the constitution.
Desperate
Which was wrong! Sold out his own country, all 6 MAGA SCOTUS DID!
You meant from the billionaires, not from the gov. salary?
@@bryan805 There is no immunity in the constitution. Hard to interpret something that doesn't exist!
Thomas Paine:
"For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be King; and there ought to be no other."
If this decision surprised you, you haven't been paying attention.
No, but when it happens its like a bunch in the gut. Still hurts.
I love how cnn titles this video with the wishy washy crap that Cobb spewed as opposed to the strongly worded rebuttal of Lawrence Tribe. Par for the course on cnn though. 😢
All politicians are skilled with masking personal actions within their official duties. This gives immunity for any actions as long as it has the thin veil of being "designated" as "official". And on top of that, the conversations around the "event" would not be allowed as evidence of the "event" when it is deemed "official".
I'm disappointed Ty Cobb doesn't play baseball anymore!
Santa Claus should stick to Christmas presents
Tribe's comments are clear and to the point. Well said sir.
So Nixon shouldn’t have stepped down. According to this court, he should have been immune.
Thomas doesn't want a special council handling his and/or his wife's prosecution. LOL Why hasn't he been accountable for tax fraud?
Hysterical?? Wow.
Ty Cobb... 🤔 Trying to get his Kult45 membership card renewed.
We can’t say hysterical anymore now?
@@zdwade @zdwade wtf are you talking about? I didn't say you can't say the word hysterical anymore.
Yeah
Wow
Cobb is hysterical
If Sotomayor was a male this “lawyer” would not had call him “hysterical”
But she's not a man. Men can't be women, women can't be men, there are TWO biological sexes (genders) etc.
Ty Cobb's choice of words is pretty bad. How he hears screaming and hysterics in Justice Sotomayor's words is on him, no one else. She called it as she saw it in plain english so everyone gets it.
what was the line and how was it fine? I don't know what case is not "an official act" under this ruling. And even then it seems pretty much impossible to try. so where is the line?
B- professor Tribe? Wouldn’t not following the Constitution be grounds for an F-?
Lawrence Tribe is just SO much
more intelligent than this Cobb guy
How often does anyone call a man's reaction "hysterical"? Get it right, Santa.
Santa Clown!
I know Judge Sottomayor . Her parents used to live in Canada , in Atlantic and Labrador 🇨🇦 province .
Keep in mind that Ty Cobb is not being interviewed because he's an expert on constitutional law, or anything else for that matter. He's being interviewed because he chose to work for Donald Trump during his nightmare presidency. Listening to Cobb on this topic is a gigantic waste of time.
THANK YOU
Right, he’s only an expert when criticizing President Trump.
He's a former US attorney and knows the criminal law exceptionally well. Your comment is moronic and Cobb has never voted for Trump.
No, he is an expert. Are you? I am not. (Maria)
he was Trumps lawyer,probably in the know or even party to the supreme court noms leading to this and other decisions against the will of the people
In conclusion for the day I apologize but I feel it is necessary I have posted this publicly on Facebook to be disseminated at each individuals own discretion.
July1, 2024
Dear World Leaders and Government Officials,
I'm writing this letter to address a matter of grave global concern from a humanitarian perspective. The ongoing actions of governments and militaries worldwide have reached a point that can only be described as an alarming crisis of conscience and ethics.
It is deeply troubling to witness the continued engagement in activities that contribute to global destruction, seemingly without regard for the devastating consequences on humanity and our planet. From an objective standpoint, these actions represent a horrific abomination that defies basic human decency and moral reasoning.
Consider for a moment how we would react if we saw children behaving in ways analogous to current global military and governmental conduct. Would we not be appalled? Would we not intervene immediately, perhaps even seeking professional help or legal intervention to correct such disturbing behavior? The fact that these actions are instead being perpetrated by adults in positions of power is even more unconscionable.
It is a damning indictment of our collective moral compass that those entrusted with leadership roles can engage in such destructive behaviors without apparent spiritual or ethical qualms. The disconnect between the responsibility to protect and nurture citizens and the actual conduct we're witnessing is staggering.
I implore you, as stewards of your nations and representatives of your people, to cease these detrimental activities immediately. It is time to reconnect with our shared humanity, to act with wisdom and compassion, and to prioritize the well-being of all global citizens and our planet.
The world is watching and waiting for a return to reason, empathy, and responsible governance. The time for positive change is now. Let us work together to create a future we can be proud to pass on to the next generations.
Sincerely, Steven Dobrovolskis
Ruidoso Downs New Mexico USA
Ask for contributions and run your letter in as many papers you can.
Maybe Biden could send out seal team 6😂😂
Hail to king Biden! He does not have to listen to court.
The voters must keep Donald Trump and dictators like him from ever being the president.
Biden needs to get SEAL Team 6 ready to go
CNN is dead to America. Ty Cobb is utterly lacking.
Why is CNN dead? You are not blaming them for Biden looking old, feeble and weak during the debate?
Both men on that CNN debate stage are not fit to lead for 4 more years
Hysterical? That description suits Donald Trump's late night toilet tweets, not Justice Sotomayor's stated opinion on a topic of such magnitude.
“Hysterical” is never applied to men
Ty Cobb, I just lost my respect for you. The Supreme court just gave Trump complete immunity. You call it seperation of powers, Its clear it Consolidation of power. Who are you?
No they did not. You need a pill or something - you are also hysterical.
I wish a had a little slice of respect for him
Ah....nope
Cobb’s being very careful, he is realizing the wind has changed direction.
cobb has no clue what he is talking about
Makes no sense. He gives the same interview almost every night on CNN at the same hour
@@imtryinghere1 lol!!he does and he is always wrong ,it is hilarious
Ty Cobb... 🤔 Tryin' hard to get his Kult45 membership card renewed. 🙄
exactly 💯 keeping himself safe.
Justice Thomas is a MAGA maniac. He has shown us that he is not fair or impartial so he must go.
“Thomas rips appointment…”
That corrupt mf should be the first to be replaced.
His term should end asap.
2A👏
Thomas and little wifey needs to go today
Did he just call one of the justices on the Supreme Court hysterical?
Yeah
He's an idiot.
What cave did this geyser come out of…. Cobb is a clown…
Haha haha
He looks like a clown!
Good one!
"Interesting" that Cobb uses the word "hysterical" to criticize the dissenting opinion of female SC Justice Sotomayor. I guess he's really "old school" regarding his opinion of women who express their emotions.
The law professor 😂😂. The constitution explicitly bars presidents from accepting bribes.
Not anymore. Any President can now sell Pardons.
This Cobb is nothing but hot air
So is Sotomayor!!
Disappointed in Ty Cobb-s use of "hysterical" and "screaming," - male trope about women. Very dismissive and demeaning of a brilliant judge.
#RepealThe19thAmendment
I'm really tryna figure out how are people shocked the President has immunity as if that hasn't been known from law and past Presidents.
Well, there are gray areas certainly, as in any human organization. There was a ruling which created "executive privilege" which isn't actually in law but was a compromise sought to limit the other branches from overwhelming the executive one. This, however, is another "not in the law" ruling which gives the POTUS known immunity, and pretty damned complete immunity, before a prosecutor can even look at it. Executive privilege has to be exerted. The POTUS is challenged, then makes the claim. That claim is evaluated. This is different. For Article II duties, there can't even be a challenge.
Nixon would take issue
He was Trump's lawyer that says it all.
Ty Cobb is still a Trump toady!
Never trust any of those trumpers
They are all corrupt
Heck of center fielder.
pete rose broke his record and ty cobb is still striking out
@@user-ut8ls7qp1j/😅
Who's more racist? That Ty Cobb or this Ty Cobb?
@@chadalpha7983 its a tie ,pete rose broke his hits streak
I am disappointed with Santa Cobb's disappointment. Sotomayor was NOT hysterical ENOUGH. This is a disaster. The scotus did NOT draw any lines between official acts and shit. They left it up to the scotus opinion of what would be official duty and what not.
Did Justice Sotomayor hurt your feelings by telling the truth Mr. Cobb? I applaud her.
Of course, a man would call a woman's dissent "hysterical," but I wonder how he would have characterized a man's reaction? 😮
My only question to you: WHAT IS A WOMAN?
@@josephgriffin2388 What is a dumbass? What is a mama's boy? What is a basement? What is a job?
There was no line! And there is no line now!
This is what Alan Dershowitz was saying a few years ago and people thought he was crazy. The Supreme Court agrees with him.
Ty Cob already getting ready for Christmas.
We have a fascist nest of 6 Supreme Court Justices .
The 2 dissents where not strong enough!!
You’re clueless. The supreme courts job is decide what the constitution says. It’s pretty black and white but liberals have a “revisionist” mindset instead of doing their job. The court shouldn’t be split at all.
I saw 3 traitors.
This guy disagrees.
Because they followed the constitution the American hating left claim the love? LOL Sotomayors dissent was written by a 5 year old and what we would expect from a DEI pick.
It’s a little early in the season for “everything I disagree with is fascism” isn’t it?
Ty Cobb is saying most of the right things but missing the conclusion. He said he was a little confused when the court said (1) conversations with the Attorney General and threats to fire Bill Barr in favor of Jeffrey Clarke are absolutely immune; and (2) official acts cannot be used as evidence even if integral to the story. THATS the problem (among other things(. It's not simply that the Court said there is presumptive immunity for official acts. It's that they defined official acts wildly broad (just talking to the AG, even about crimes to commit?!?!) and also destroyed a prosecutor's ability to make a case by having to exclude anything touching on this broadly defined official act of plotting crimes with the AG. Cobb really is missing the point here.
You forgot Checks and Balances. No one is above the law. Immunity is actually in violation of Checks and Balances.
The Guiding Principles of the U.S. Law and Government. These are the tools the Founding Fathers used to write the U.S. Constitution (authority) and the Bill of Rights (checks and balances against authority, what they are not allowed to do).
1. Checks and Balances
2. Separation of Powers
3. Separation of Church and State
4. Term Limits for Presidents*
Why not for Congress? They are seated as peers, while the President is placed at the head of state. The President can do anything he wants, as long as it he does not violate the law. He can even challenge the law, should he have grounds to.
Sotomayor points out that they knew how to give immunity when they wrote the Constitution because it's in there. Legislators have a narrow immunity via the Speech and Debate clause. They made no such protections for the POTUS and that wasn't an oversight. These "originalists" and "textualists" have constructed this decision without any actual basis, just the desire for a unitary executive who can use power at will and not face consequences, aside from impeachment/removal (but no criminal conviction afterward no matter what).
Not the hysterical the Trump layers literally made those claims and Sotomayor is hysterical wtf
Ty Cobb still batting for the other side, as usual.
#FeloniousCult45GQP 💸🇷🇺🇸🇦