Kiwi here: Whilst there is a great deal about the England side to be excited about (who wouldn't want Atkinson, Carse, Bethel and Smith in your side, and let's not forget the sublime Joe Root?), my concern for England is that New Zealand flattered them in the first test by dropping so many catches. Obviously it's not possible to say that NZ would have won the game had those catches been taken. But England, despite deservedly winning the series, needs to take them into consideration when evaluating the series and their performance.
I think we are but you have to remember after your india series and our pakistan series we were expecting to lose. England are a good side with potential to topple India and Australia but may well lose both series convincingly. Looking forward to watching both series.
Well, we flattered you by not scoring more runs and taking wickets quicker. I really don't understand this catching argument. The same logic applies to all elements of the game.
@lingolarker9318 Australia are likely to be more vulnerable next year than they have been in a while. Khawaja is in his late 30's, the opener pool is shallow and the best prospects are still young and building their game, and there is an even chance Australia will need to blood a less experienced quick sometime during the series. Still tough competition, but the chinks in their armour may be wider than in recent years.
So do you like this England? As a neutral fan ( from India) we had a great time playing the home series vs Eng and have watched most of the tests played by England coz of their exciting brand of cricket.
Im from Pakistan I think England is most criticised team Yea they have lost the game by big margin but they have won the series against a team which ended india home streak The same bowling lineup destroyed india in india and england batted extraordinary in first 2 match Yea there have been moments where england had lost the match but still they won in new Zealand which is A quite remarkable Achievement After the end of T20 Wc this year, England needed to won 12 match of 12 to qualify for wtc final i never expected them to win all 12 But they won 8 out of 12 which is still a decent achievement 😊
If Stokes can't bowl, he's not a good enough batsman to keep his place in the team. Nasser says that Crawley is out of form, but his career average is 30. That's a long time to be out of form. He also underplayed how badly England were outplayed. They won the toss and sent NZ in under perfect seam bowling conditions, but still managed to lose by 423 runs. It's time that England went back to playing proper cricket.
He's a brilliant captain. But if you look ar his record as a batsman in the past few years you'd be forced to accept that I am not 'insane'.@@henryburton6529
@@henryburton6529 Very true. I've been following cricket for a long time and I could write a book about these cricket commenters. One of them claimed that the Ashes wins of 2009, 2010-11, 2013 and 2015 don't count because they were against very poor Australian teams!!!!!!
Nasser is great. However, why no mention of Chris Woakes, who took 32 wickets this year in 9 Tests at an average of 24.09. Woakes played in all the away victories but did not play in any of the defeats. It was the same in the last Ashes. This past summer he played in 5 wins and 1 defeat. One day the penny will drop that England are a better team with him in it.
Is he selected based on conditions? I suspect conditions that suit his bowling would also suit the English side more generally. I've seen him get mauled a couple of times on pitches with little sideways movement.
@@bluecedar7914 Fair point, but he bowled well on flat pitches this winter. The key point is his use of the new ball. Show me someone who is better? Funnily enough, statistically speaking, Mark Wood is not so good at home, where he takes his wickets at 32, as opposed to Woakes at 21. The media, however, never mention this comparison. Wood is far better away from home on slow/flat pitches.
@@bobbysmith5756 Woakes can bat pretty well as seeing as he can actually bowl he's more of an all rounder than the venerable Benjamin Stokes who isn't a good bowler and a bang average batsman who manages a good knock once in a while
Nz won 3rd test fair and square ..but in there first innings ive never seen so many boundrys of the edge of the bat..none went to hand ..where ours did ..verry weird .
@@henryburton6529And what? You can't drive for getting better? Just because we beat New Zealand we should relax and go okay yeah we'll 5-0 India and Australia?
@@archierch0463Against mid sides in West Indies and Sri Lanka. We should have 6-0d the summer but we didn't. When we face tougher tests in India and Australia, you need more to win, you can't falter towards the end of the series or you'll get embarrassed
England are a better team than the WTC standings show but there are too many ifs, buts and maybes. The batting has too many players that can strike the ball but can not build an innings and are essentially useless against spin. The bowling looks promising with Atkinson and Carse but neither has the x factor of someone like Archer, or even Saqib who doesn't even have a red ball contract. There isn't a world class spin option and Stokes is now more liability than match winner.
If you replace him with a specialist batsman then that would mean playing with only four bowlers, that's a risky move. Is there another all rounders somewhere that deserves a go.
It is indeed WTC or bust. All this glitter of defeating teams in under 3 days playing attacking cricket might be entertaining for the fans but is of no value if one wins ten and loses ten.
The England team don't seem to have the experience to change their tactics in adversity...They just keep on playing the same way. Some of the shots that lost wickets were criminal.
England’s batting was atrocious in their second innings. It was as if they weren’t actually trying to win and weren’t trying to save the gave. They basically looked like they gave up.
Serious question: Is stokes good enough? Not fit enough to bowl regularly, goes at 4-6 an over with only occasional wickets. No real consistent runs at 6. If he is so much about the team, would he drop himself.
Stokes not good enough to be selected as a batsman and can't be relied on to bowl, not that he's that good a bowler anyway. One dimensional captain, time for him to step down. Take away the hype and he's not that good
If NZ would have held onto all their chances in first test may be the results would have been different bcz apart from brook and root rest of the batting has been medicore.
Eng did the same in 3rd test against SL.. They didn't want to win. One Test against SL + one test against NZ + 23 deducted points, hav cost Eng WTC final.
Dunno. Aussie here. Australia's bowling attack is constantly pulling them out of and there is a used-by date coming. Batting is very inconsistent and in transition with Warner gone, Smith on the decline. The poms have a chance of getting something next Ashes - if they stop with the Bazball.
Australia's lack of quality experienced openers will leave them a little vulnerable next year. Even their middle order has been too reliant on Head and Carey against India. Smith did look good on Sunday but.
I mean that the England cricket team is very much focussed on aggressive brand of cricket. As we see that the test match requires a tenacity of purpose with a sole aim of undoing the opponent's strategy and taking forward the team to the winning podium. Then that be the case the team should learn the art of manuring through the situation and come out successful. The current England batters and bowlers have the necessary technique and adaptability to do so but then their mind sets were not properly focussed. N.S.G.
They shouldn’t have dropped Woakes. He is great at making the early breakthroughs. Never change a winning side! As a result Stokes overstretched himself and now he has another hamstring injury!
Interesting interview. Crawley does not have the technique to play top class fast seam or swing bowling. Playing across his front pad is a dream for any top notch quickie. Pope needs to realise that Test Cricket is not a 20/20 slog. Ben Stokes has hardly shone with bat or ball since he became team skipper...a rare explosive performance is no substitute for consistency with bat and ball. He needs to provide some backbone to the middle order and some accurate probing bowling in support of the front line attack. Do or die is not a five day game mindset that works. Joe Root...head and shoulders above everyone else in technique and mindset. He needs a number five that can support him, much in the way that Ken Barrington provided for the England team in the sixties. As Nassar said, being bowled out for 143 on a decent batting wicket simply does not cut the mustard.
@@samoday2992 Good question. I don't care trust Stokes to put him where he is of most value to the team. I'd probably go Pope 3 bethel instead of Crawley but apparently Crawley will be good in Australia.
England need to keep their Fast bowlers match fit against Indian & need to sort out the openers it will be a tough series coming Summer & next winter in Australia
Baz bowl can give you some matches or some series, big No for WTC Trophy if you play like this, where is temprament?, even they don't deserve in top 3 in WTC, where is sensible cricket POP, bhethal and ducket, stokes 37 overs is too many he rang the doors of injury in this match and got it.
India is the comparator though. Except for that last test, where we got absolutely mullered, England were competitive regularly during that series. Sure India won, they were the better team, and English players have no real experience of playing on turning wickets (this is why our spin attack looks like it's just left school). The last time, we just looked utterly hopeless.
I find it interesting that England will take a punt on young players but are reluctant when Stokes is unavailable to try a seam bowling all rounder. When Stokes was injured it definitely upsets the balance of the side, there's a few guys who could get a go but they seem reluctant to have a look for some reason. Bashir bowled absolute dross this test, but he's young and that inconsistent performance is part and parcel of young players. I feel sorry for Leach he's had rotten luck with injury and despite out bowling Bashir last year they played together he's still out. I think you should play your beat team, Pope looked good behind the stumps and ironically rather than detract from his batting it's almost given him something that seems to stop him overthinking his batting and is playing more freely because he knows even if he fails with the bat he's able to contribute.
Crawley needs to go Duckett Bethell Root Brook Stokes but at what point is he a liability Smith Carse/woakes (at home) Atkinson Wood Bashir How do you get archer into the side? Who replaces Crawley?
Blah Blah! all the usual buzzwords from the same old pundits! no one is allowed to criticize! apart from root all our batters techniques are very poor, apart from, we don't have a spinner, and we don't have any bowlers who can bowl extreme pace! so after 4 years of planning again we go to Austrailia, with no spinner and a pop gun attack! and a batting line up that will be totally exposed by the Aussie bowlers in Aussie conditions!
you guys are idiots. Brooke and Root were no.1 and 2 in the world before this game. and you say "apart from root all our batters techniques are very poor" You have to be literally retarded to think this.
Fair analysis.Last time England won in Australia we had Cook and Trott scoring big runs.This England batting line up isn't going to score big runs in Australia so it doesn't matter what bowling line up we send as they won't have the runs on the board to put any pressure on the Aussie batting.Utterly predictable result coming up in The Ashes i'm afraid.
@@adrianlloyd6403 dude - Brooke and Root are no.1 and 2 in the world what in gods name are you talking about? Please try to be a bit humble you are talking absolute nonsense.
@@henryburton6529 If you want to go down that road of ICC Test rankings then rather being selective of the data you choose to pick to make a point of calling a comment 'absolute nonsense' then may i selectively pick out the fact that Australia have four bowlers in the top eleven bowling rankings (nos.3,4,7,11)whereas England have precisely NONE.May i point out that if i'm talking nonsense then you are equally doing so and humility is required from both parties.Let's see what transpires in a year's time.Objectivity is far better than subjectivity in relation to English sport i find.
FFS we won the series ok the last test by a big score but we've we've won by big scores to stokes has brought excitement back to test cricket thankfully he wants to entertain I do think Crawley needs dropping and obviously Smith will be back am not a lover of the reverse sweep or over the head that's not cricket
We won the series and the boys clearly wanted to come home and celebrate christmas with their families. People just like to moan, keep the tears up ya melts.
Bottom line it's only a game; get over it. These people are only human and no sportsperson on earth gets things right all the time. The home side are intitled to Win one by playing well. If the England players go for their shots and it goes well everyone's applauding, then the reverse if it doesn't. If it's the style of play and you win more than you lose that's fair enough. Like i said it's only a game, if it's more han that to you. Get over yourselves or give yourself a good talking to in the mirror.
Australia are going to destroy this side with the way they play. NZ had Southee and were bowling with 2 seamers, a part time spinner. If you had 4 seamers bowling 140k +, England are going to have alot of 3 day tests in Australia
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 Maybe, maybe not. If they play a different way are they going to win? Is there any way they could play and not lose 5-0 in your mind?
@@henryburton6529 Yes, they could play better. England were nowhere near their best in Hamilton. If they play like they did in Wellington they will be more competitive. The trick is to be at their best on the first day so they're not playing catchup for the rest of the match.
This so called brand of cricket its boring and annoying take ducketts shot and pope really. This is beyond pathetic i would expect that in village cricket not test cricket. Mccullum gone please and stokes his done with his knees crawley and duckett never test match openers and bethell isnt a no 3
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Kiwi here: Whilst there is a great deal about the England side to be excited about (who wouldn't want Atkinson, Carse, Bethel and Smith in your side, and let's not forget the sublime Joe Root?), my concern for England is that New Zealand flattered them in the first test by dropping so many catches. Obviously it's not possible to say that NZ would have won the game had those catches been taken. But England, despite deservedly winning the series, needs to take them into consideration when evaluating the series and their performance.
I think we are but you have to remember after your india series and our pakistan series we were expecting to lose.
England are a good side with potential to topple India and Australia but may well lose both series convincingly. Looking forward to watching both series.
Well, we flattered you by not scoring more runs and taking wickets quicker. I really don't understand this catching argument. The same logic applies to all elements of the game.
Surely the dropped catches is more an indictment on kiwis fielding than anything else
@@henryburton6529If we lose to India at home and therefore lose at least 4-1 in Oz then we face true Test oblivion.
@lingolarker9318 Australia are likely to be more vulnerable next year than they have been in a while. Khawaja is in his late 30's, the opener pool is shallow and the best prospects are still young and building their game, and there is an even chance Australia will need to blood a less experienced quick sometime during the series. Still tough competition, but the chinks in their armour may be wider than in recent years.
Under Stokes and McCullum England will always be one of those sides that can either hammer a team or get hammered on any given day
So do you like this England? As a neutral fan ( from India) we had a great time playing the home series vs Eng and have watched most of the tests played by England coz of their exciting brand of cricket.
As opposed to the previous england captain and coache who only ever got hammered😅
Nass is 1 of the best honest cricket analysts out there. He doesn’t just back his home side brainlessly. Just says it how it is, good & bad😊
What do you call a female analyst? Analysister.
As an England fan I will accept crushing defeats as long as we win the series.
Im from Pakistan
I think England is most criticised team
Yea they have lost the game by big margin but they have won the series against a team which ended india home streak
The same bowling lineup destroyed india in india and england batted extraordinary in first 2 match
Yea there have been moments where england had lost the match but still they won in new Zealand which is A quite remarkable Achievement
After the end of T20 Wc this year, England needed to won 12 match of 12 to qualify for wtc final i never expected them to win all 12
But they won 8 out of 12 which is still a decent achievement 😊
england are over hyped. they havent qualified for all WTC finals. unless you win games, nothing is great. Bazball is overhyped by English media
Yes mate agreed. But just to be clear a lot of people here don't feel the hype. It's just that Sky sports are basically part of the ECB
If Stokes can't bowl, he's not a good enough batsman to keep his place in the team. Nasser says that Crawley is out of form, but his career average is 30. That's a long time to be out of form. He also underplayed how badly England were outplayed. They won the toss and sent NZ in under perfect seam bowling conditions, but still managed to lose by 423 runs. It's time that England went back to playing proper cricket.
Insane statement. Stokes is one of our best batsmen who has sacrificed himself to get England playing well enough to beat NZ away
When you say 'playing proper cricket' I take it you mean like Chris Tavare getting the team to 38 for 1 at lunch and 130 for 7 at 6pm.
@@AlunThomas-mp5qo exactly. most commenters here have no idea what they are talking about.
He's a brilliant captain. But if you look ar his record as a batsman in the past few years you'd be forced to accept that I am not 'insane'.@@henryburton6529
@@henryburton6529 Very true. I've been following cricket for a long time and I could write a book about these cricket commenters. One of them claimed that the Ashes wins of 2009, 2010-11, 2013 and 2015 don't count because they were against very poor Australian teams!!!!!!
Nasser is great. However, why no mention of Chris Woakes, who took 32 wickets this year in 9 Tests at an average of 24.09. Woakes played in all the away victories but did not play in any of the defeats. It was the same in the last Ashes. This past summer he played in 5 wins and 1 defeat. One day the penny will drop that England are a better team with him in it.
Is he selected based on conditions? I suspect conditions that suit his bowling would also suit the English side more generally. I've seen him get mauled a couple of times on pitches with little sideways movement.
@@bluecedar7914 Fair point, but he bowled well on flat pitches this winter. The key point is his use of the new ball. Show me someone who is better? Funnily enough, statistically speaking, Mark Wood is not so good at home, where he takes his wickets at 32, as opposed to Woakes at 21. The media, however, never mention this comparison. Wood is far better away from home on slow/flat pitches.
@@bobbysmith5756 Woakes can bat pretty well as seeing as he can actually bowl he's more of an all rounder than the venerable Benjamin Stokes who isn't a good bowler and a bang average batsman who manages a good knock once in a while
Nz won 3rd test fair and square ..but in there first innings ive never seen so many boundrys of the edge of the bat..none went to hand ..where ours did ..verry weird .
I'd say it's definitely a concern that as the last few series have gone on, we've played worse. Whether it's mental or physical, it needs fixing
True but we’re home next where we won 5/6 this year.
WE JUST WON are you suffering from a stroke?
@@henryburton6529And what? You can't drive for getting better? Just because we beat New Zealand we should relax and go okay yeah we'll 5-0 India and Australia?
@@archierch0463Against mid sides in West Indies and Sri Lanka. We should have 6-0d the summer but we didn't. When we face tougher tests in India and Australia, you need more to win, you can't falter towards the end of the series or you'll get embarrassed
It's ebbs and flows in the Cricketing World 🌎🌍 losing to winning
England are a better team than the WTC standings show but there are too many ifs, buts and maybes. The batting has too many players that can strike the ball but can not build an innings and are essentially useless against spin. The bowling looks promising with Atkinson and Carse but neither has the x factor of someone like Archer, or even Saqib who doesn't even have a red ball contract. There isn't a world class spin option and Stokes is now more liability than match winner.
I would not call Atkinson and Carse one dimensional bowlers, they have proved in Pakistan that they can get batsmen out on flat pitches.
I agree about Stokes, for me if he can't bowl I actually don't think he's worth his place to be honest over a specialist batter.
England play more tests than any other nation. If the win/loss % isn't the best gauge for their sample size, then I don't know what is.
Saqib?! 🤨
If you replace him with a specialist batsman then that would mean playing with only four bowlers, that's a risky move. Is there another all rounders somewhere that deserves a go.
England are fortunate that suddenly they have several talented batsmen and some good pace bowlers. They no longer need to play silly cricket.
It is indeed WTC or bust. All this glitter of defeating teams in under 3 days playing attacking cricket might be entertaining for the fans but is of no value if one wins ten and loses ten.
The England team don't seem to have the experience to change their tactics in adversity...They just keep on playing the same way. Some of the shots that lost wickets were criminal.
England’s batting was atrocious in their second innings. It was as if they weren’t actually trying to win and weren’t trying to save the gave. They basically looked like they gave up.
Serious question: Is stokes good enough? Not fit enough to bowl regularly, goes at 4-6 an over with only occasional wickets. No real consistent runs at 6. If he is so much about the team, would he drop himself.
absolute garbage. One of our best batters and a useful 4th seamer and the captain that saw us win 11 of first 12 matches.
@@henryburton6529 in your dreams he is past his best
@@Cliff163 In your dreams too right? You surely want England to do well
@@henryburton6529 all rounder not any more sadly, hardly ian botham is he.
Stokes not good enough to be selected as a batsman and can't be relied on to bowl, not that he's that good a bowler anyway. One dimensional captain, time for him to step down. Take away the hype and he's not that good
If NZ would have held onto all their chances in first test may be the results would have been different bcz apart from brook and root rest of the batting has been medicore.
Bethell
Bethell's been good in his first series.
@amireallythatgrumpy6508 yes a really good prospect.
Eng did the same in 3rd test against SL.. They didn't want to win.
One Test against SL + one test against NZ + 23 deducted points, hav cost Eng WTC final.
Nice to hear Ollie Pope is getting in some early preparation for his stint with my Adelaide Strikers!
Embarrasing. Crawley should never ever play for England again.😮
England will be beaten 5-0 in the Ashes. The big issue is their batsmen are unable to battle for their lives to stay at the crease.
Dunno. Aussie here. Australia's bowling attack is constantly pulling them out of and there is a used-by date coming. Batting is very inconsistent and in transition with Warner gone, Smith on the decline. The poms have a chance of getting something next Ashes - if they stop with the Bazball.
Australia's lack of quality experienced openers will leave them a little vulnerable next year. Even their middle order has been too reliant on Head and Carey against India. Smith did look good on Sunday but.
Bashir’s been poor Nass! Let’s be honest!
I mean that the England cricket team is very much focussed on aggressive brand of cricket. As we see that the test match requires a tenacity of purpose with a sole aim of undoing the opponent's strategy and taking forward the team to the winning podium. Then that be the case the team should learn the art of manuring through the situation and come out successful. The current England batters and bowlers have the necessary technique and adaptability to do so but then their mind sets were not properly focussed.
N.S.G.
They shouldn’t have dropped Woakes. He is great at making the early breakthroughs. Never change a winning side! As a result Stokes overstretched himself and now he has another hamstring injury!
They knew they had no chance of getting the runs. A touch of "go home itis"
Interesting interview. Crawley does not have the technique to play top class fast seam or swing bowling. Playing across his front pad is a dream for any top notch quickie. Pope needs to realise that Test Cricket is not a 20/20 slog. Ben Stokes has hardly shone with bat or ball since he became team skipper...a rare explosive performance is no substitute for consistency with bat and ball. He needs to provide some backbone to the middle order and some accurate probing bowling in support of the front line attack. Do or die is not a five day game mindset that works.
Joe Root...head and shoulders above everyone else in technique and mindset. He needs a number five that can support him, much in the way that Ken Barrington provided for the England team in the sixties.
As Nassar said, being bowled out for 143 on a decent batting wicket simply does not cut the mustard.
Calling Pope vulnerable is insane. He's been one of our most reliable batters this series.
where
@@Cliff163 look at his scores - can you read?
@@henryburton6529where in the batting order should he go ?
@@samoday2992 Good question. I don't care trust Stokes to put him where he is of most value to the team.
I'd probably go Pope 3 bethel instead of Crawley but apparently Crawley will be good in Australia.
How is calling a bloke who averages 34 in almost 60 tests vulnerable insane. We’ve been told this potential is coming but where is it?
England need to keep their Fast bowlers match fit against Indian & need to sort out the openers it will be a tough series coming Summer & next winter in Australia
Baz bowl can give you some matches or some series, big No for WTC Trophy if you play like this, where is temprament?, even they don't deserve in top 3 in WTC, where is sensible cricket POP, bhethal and ducket, stokes 37 overs is too many he rang the doors of injury in this match and got it.
434 runs defeat in india
423 runs defend in NZ
Two big losses in a year
India is the comparator though. Except for that last test, where we got absolutely mullered, England were competitive regularly during that series. Sure India won, they were the better team, and English players have no real experience of playing on turning wickets (this is why our spin attack looks like it's just left school).
The last time, we just looked utterly hopeless.
Rightfully smashed... Very inconsistent team
Inconsistent? Erm, you forgotten kiwis last series before this?
I find it interesting that England will take a punt on young players but are reluctant when Stokes is unavailable to try a seam bowling all rounder.
When Stokes was injured it definitely upsets the balance of the side, there's a few guys who could get a go but they seem reluctant to have a look for some reason.
Bashir bowled absolute dross this test, but he's young and that inconsistent performance is part and parcel of young players.
I feel sorry for Leach he's had rotten luck with injury and despite out bowling Bashir last year they played together he's still out.
I think you should play your beat team, Pope looked good behind the stumps and ironically rather than detract from his batting it's almost given him something that seems to stop him overthinking his batting and is playing more freely because he knows even if he fails with the bat he's able to contribute.
Nasser best pundit in the game
Im from Pakistan
I think England is kinda team can come back and win ICC Trophy under Stokes captaincy
Man all the sports people I grew up with look so old now
Crawley needs to go
Duckett
Bethell
Root
Brook
Stokes but at what point is he a liability
Smith
Carse/woakes (at home)
Atkinson
Wood
Bashir
How do you get archer into the side? Who replaces Crawley?
Im starting to find McCullum's and Stokes attitude and arrogance very worrying. They are getting tiresome.
The day root retires , Eng is done n dusted
What rubbish shot pope played
@@ce11amitkumaryadav83Absolute nonsense. Done and dusted 🤣
@@ce11amitkumaryadav83 It's a shot Root himself plays regularly
@@DJR1409 absolute true , we will see
Done n dusted doesn't mean u will loose every test
U will win 3/10 after root
@@dominiclloyd6651 not after Bumrah nutmeged him in India , he hasn't play that since
It was a bad result but we did win the series.
Seems like we took our foot off the pedal
Nassers love in with Stokes is a bit embarrassing tbh
Both are cringe
Blah Blah! all the usual buzzwords from the same old pundits! no one is allowed to criticize! apart from root all our batters techniques are very poor, apart from, we don't have a spinner, and we don't have any bowlers who can bowl extreme pace! so after 4 years of planning again we go to Austrailia, with no spinner and a pop gun attack! and a batting line up that will be totally exposed by the Aussie bowlers in Aussie conditions!
Australia is going to be a mess. No opener, Stokes on 1 leg, no spinner, and no pace . Also, Root's record is terrible thwre
you guys are idiots. Brooke and Root were no.1 and 2 in the world before this game.
and you say "apart from root all our batters techniques are very poor"
You have to be literally retarded to think this.
Fair analysis.Last time England won in Australia we had Cook and Trott scoring big runs.This England batting line up isn't going to score big runs in Australia so it doesn't matter what bowling line up we send as they won't have the runs on the board to put any pressure on the Aussie batting.Utterly predictable result coming up in The Ashes i'm afraid.
@@adrianlloyd6403 dude - Brooke and Root are no.1 and 2 in the world what in gods name are you talking about?
Please try to be a bit humble you are talking absolute nonsense.
@@henryburton6529 If you want to go down that road of ICC Test rankings then rather being selective of the data you choose to pick to make a point of calling a comment 'absolute nonsense' then may i selectively pick out the fact that Australia have four bowlers in the top eleven bowling rankings (nos.3,4,7,11)whereas England have precisely NONE.May i point out that if i'm talking nonsense then you are equally doing so and humility is required from both parties.Let's see what transpires in a year's time.Objectivity is far better than subjectivity in relation to English sport i find.
It is not about losing it is how you play and they play in this match pathetic
FFS we won the series ok the last test by a big score but we've we've won by big scores to stokes has brought excitement back to test cricket thankfully he wants to entertain I do think Crawley needs dropping and obviously Smith will be back am not a lover of the reverse sweep or over the head that's not cricket
The great Aussies team of the Warne McGrath era used to win the series but lose the last test,i'll settle for that.
We won the series and the boys clearly wanted to come home and celebrate christmas with their families.
People just like to moan, keep the tears up ya melts.
Well they're not going to get that chance next year...
Disappointing for England as they were planning on two days off, not one. 🤣
Bottom line it's only a game; get over it. These people are only human and no sportsperson on earth gets things right all the time. The home side are intitled to Win one by playing well. If the England players go for their shots and it goes well everyone's applauding, then the reverse if it doesn't. If it's the style of play and you win more than you lose that's fair enough. Like i said it's only a game, if it's more han that to you. Get over yourselves or give yourself a good talking to in the mirror.
"Criggida." Poor man's Atherton. The studious glasses don't change it.
It is time Stokes step aside as captain. He cost the England series in Pakistan and earlier in India.
Cost England the Ashes by declaring at Edgbaston as well and bowling first at Lords
Yeah lets bring back Root as captain😅
England > India.
But india has not lost this series yet 😂.india will bounce back and if we got lucky so india could play wtc final
Most overrated test team England most overrated test cricketer Ben stokes most overated nonsense is BAZBALL
garbage
Australia are going to destroy this side with the way they play. NZ had Southee and were bowling with 2 seamers, a part time spinner. If you had 4 seamers bowling 140k +, England are going to have alot of 3 day tests in Australia
You have no idea what you are talking about.
@@henryburton6529 If England played the way they did this week in 12 months time Australia are going to beat them 5-0.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 Maybe, maybe not. If they play a different way are they going to win?
Is there any way they could play and not lose 5-0 in your mind?
@@henryburton6529 Yes, they could play better. England were nowhere near their best in Hamilton. If they play like they did in Wellington they will be more competitive. The trick is to be at their best on the first day so they're not playing catchup for the rest of the match.
Absolutely correct . Back the 5-0 now , England are full of flakey batsmen who are unable to dig in and battle .
Nassru.
Sain.
Yours is a boring team - England - Gavaskar once said..
Why does the woman have such an exaggerated accent?
Ben stockes 😂😂😂😂
Brittle
Where is Michael Vaughan to remarks at this match 😂
This so called brand of cricket its boring and annoying take ducketts shot and pope really. This is beyond pathetic i would expect that in village cricket not test cricket. Mccullum gone please and stokes his done with his knees crawley and duckett never test match openers and bethell isnt a no 3
England over rated
Matt Kabir Floyd