223 vs 5.56: Can’t Believe The Difference
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 фев 2024
- On this episode of Ultimate Barrier Testing, we will be comparing the performance of the 223 Rem to the 5.56 (5.56x45 or 5.56 NATO) on 4 different targets. Each target is worth 25 points (winner takes all), for a grand total of 100 points. Whichever cartridge ends up with the highest score will be the winner. Testing was setup at 50 yards. Thanks for watching!
Use code "banana10" at checkout for 10 percent off your purchase at WOOX Store.
Use code "BANANA10" at checkout for 10% off of AR500 Armor (Armored Republic) products at MidwayUSA.
*These tests are meant for entertainment and educational purposes only. Do not try any of these tests at home! Always verify your setup is rated for and can safely fire any ammunition that you intend to use. I get a small commission from purchases using the codes above.
5.56 NATO: WIN 55 gr FMJ M193
223 Rem: WIN 55 gr FMJ
#midwayusa 
Развлечения
![NOSFERATU - Official Teaser Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/b59rxDB_JRg/mqdefault.jpg)
My biggest takeaway from the videos with sand is that I see why we still use sandbags
lol
100% It compresses when struck, makes a great barrier.
Filling the walls of my compound as we speak! In Minecraft, of course.
It is EXTREMELY effective at stopping all kinds of serious stuff. During the war in Iraq, we would fill "Hesco Bastions" with sand off the ground and put them around our FOB (Forward Operating Base) to create a barrier. It's just a metal cage with this fabric-type material that will hold the sand inside. They can stop mortar rounds, artillery, up to 30mm weapons, massive trucks, high explosives, etc. and it's just sand. Pretty impressive stuff. Saved me a couple times.
Facts bro, still surprised me that sand can hold a lot of builds in a close space. Just imagine a whole all built of sand
This guys voice was built to be a radio DJ. Sounds like he should be saying “and up next we have some cooool jazz from Miles Davis, right after this quick commercial break”
Aaaannnd, next on stage two is Angela. She's a community college student who is almost done with her nursing degree!
I thought he sounds like Ray Romano
Yeah he has a golden deep baritone
Has resonance and timbre but no professional training. His delivery would not make it on radio without some good training and practice. Reminds me of Ray Romano...
@@45johngaltI was thinking the brother
The velocity on the boxes is usually with 20” barrel on 556 and 24” barrel on 223. The 223 is marketed as a bolt gun varmit cartridge.
Indeed This is true!
I was about to mention the same, although I would take the lengths further down, at least for 5.56. Usually 5.56 barrels are 14"-16". Then the higher pressure/bigger powder load on 5.56 cannot compensate for the lot longer .223 barrel used for the data on the boxes.
@@juhanivalimaki5418 I've seen upwards of 3,500 fps from M193 coming out of my 22" bolt gun, so they still do gain velocity. :D
@@juhanivalimaki5418 current popular barrel length trends are are outliers for the original design of these cartridges. I get your point. But, whatever results these tests produce with 18 to 20" barrels, shorter barrels by default are going produce worse not better.
As a member of the "disarmed for your own safety" society in the EU, I enjoy the additional info provided by such comments.
Sadly - firearms is a "book only" hobby for me :(
I'm glad we could help out again my friend! Excellent Video as always! That M855a1 almost made it through that sand ;) | if you need more for testing, just let me know!
He won’t shoot it on steel, he will just put it on his only fans page😤
@@saltymofo5870 If he wanted a bunch to shoot at different steels etc etc, if be happy to provide them.
Does that round perform good with a shorter barrel? Let’s say a 7.5” barrel?
@emacstacticalcom4105 Are those rounds for sale? I would like to test some out on different types of metal and wood
Seriously Emacs thank you SO MUCH for giving him your ammo for the reviews. You all are freaking amazing. The next time I need something, I’ll be checking your website first.
It matters because the chamber that’s cut inside the barrel of a 223 vs 556 are different. As far as the portion of the chamber that encases the cartridge case, they’re the same; it’s the chamber cut past the case mouth that’s different. A chamber in a 5.56 NATO barrel has a longer throat, which is the segment of the chamber between the case mouth and where the rifling lands taper from nothing to the bore diameter of 0.219-inch/5.56 millimeters. This extra space allows the barrel to withstand the higher pressures of the 5.56 NATO. It’s that simple. What’s not as simple is the interchangeability.It is perfectly safe to shoot 223 Remington ammunition in a 5.56 NATO rifle, but in some cases, precision can be less than stellar. On the other hand, it’s considered unsafe to shoot 5.56 NATO ammunition in a 223 Remington rifle. You see, the 5.56 NATO cartridge will produce about 62,000 psi in a 5.56 NATO chamber, and that’s OK. But in the 223 Remington chamber with the tighter throat, pressures can exceed 70,000. That’s not OK... Certified Gunsmith here and if you dont believe me do the research you will see for yourself.
Absolutely correct. Throat erosion & over pressure is real.
Totally, it's all in how you're chambered kid...
Well put.
as someone who has worked for a self defense and rifle fighting school and seen millions of rounds go through our loaner rifles i can without a doubt say that it doesnt matter not one bit.
As a former grunt, I can attest to my love of sandbags and a well built fighting position. When shit starts gettin "real" the dirt start to "appeal"!!!!!
I bet wet sand is even better?
Oh, that sweet, sweet earth...
@@bryanst.martin7134Mass and density. Water filling in the tiny spaces between grains of sand should help.
@@TUKByV It should also reduce the sand spilling out of the hole. There is another form of barrier, Glycol mixed with Fumed silica. Flexible till struck at high velocity, then it instantly crystalizes.
@@bryanst.martin7134 Oh, yeah. Heard about that some years ago. Did anyone market it?
Most reloading manuals have their test rifles at a 22-24” bolt gun for .223. That’s why it has the higher velocity. 5.56 is USUALLY tested out of 20” M16. I’m sure there are some manuals out there that might test out of a bolt gun. I haven’t read every manual to be 100% sure.
WELL GET TOOO IT SON! lololol jokes aside that's a good point
Great point. Size matters
they are tested out of a testing action, not a gun per say.
Really says something about the quality of your videos that we're here in 2024 watching 5.56 v. .223 videos and enjoying them.
223 is not annealed looks as your 223 is a reload or not a 223.check it out for your self
😮
this guys voice doesnt match his face lol
FACTS
I was thinking that wasn’t his real voice, too.
I've got a match ! Your face & my ..... 😂
He could be a relation of Ray Romano.
It's because it isn't his real voice.
I love this version of Ray Romano great job.
Leaving a message just to say I love how your video just spat out the facts. No superfluous yacking! Great format…interesting and efficient. Thank you
This guy is very entertaining. Hope his channel grows.
He is definitely stepping up the comedy, the waiter bit…
I agree, he has the voice of a radio disc jockey.
Love what you do man! Solid tests.
Thanks so much for the extra half second of screen time on the bullet stats at the beginning of the video. So much easier to read.
Temporary work around: Download the video and replay it much slower on your computer. It helps sometimes.
didn't you hear? RUclips introduced this fantastic feature. Its called pausing. all you have to do i click/tap in the middle of the video and it stops playing.
@@zachdemand4508😂
@@firstnamerequiredlastnameo3473If you click on the cog thingy on the video you can change the playback speed
@@zachdemand4508 A pause feature? It's probably an add-on that costs an arm and a leg. No thanks, I'll just learn to read faster.
I've always UNDER-appreciated the finer points of ballistics, even though I've been shooting/hunting from the age of '4', and am also a USMC Vet with two tours under my cover. For myself, accuracy has always been the most important thing, and then choosing the suitable caliber vs whatever target/game/enemy I expected to face. Seeing videos like *THIS* one, that clearly shows the nuances and why they matter, is one of the best things about YT/the Internet, IMHO!
Thank you for all your hard work and in sharing it with us/the world!
:-D
Although this channel is ggod, there are a few that are many times better. At this point however, its not the stats that matter and the personality that people want. This is a younger channel, and will grow because the content is good.
Once banana becomes more comfortable, and his knowledge expands, as well as funds, there will be no limit to his testing.
Thank you for the hard work in losing to farmers!
@@stopstealingmyname5794
'Losing to farmers.'
Care to explain exactly WTF you meant by that, or is your utter lack of English language and Reading Comprehension insurmountable?
The difference may help when the varmints are behind a barrier. The M193 seems just a bit better at converting cover to just concealment.
@@AniwayasSong they are a troll. Don't give them any more of your time.
Unless you sling a lot bigger and higher velocity projectile at that sand box, you are just proving the practice of sand bagging for use in personal protection while in a fighting positions.
I'm VERY new to firearms and love when i come across a channel that's highly informative as well as entertaining lol definite sub
Man, ray romano putting out some good content. Subscribed.
Can’t believe I’ve never seen this channel before, good stuff brother
This guy is entertaining af. subbed.
One of the best voices I've heard on YT in a long time. You could could have an amazing career in voice acting or radio.
Please don't take this the wrong way, I do like the channel and I often learn new things from it. The main problem I see here, is that he fired both rounds from the same rifle, most likely chambered in 5.56. Although the dimensional differences between the two rounds are small, they are different. The main difference is the shape of the cartridge, mostly the length and angles in the bend of the throat. This is why some people will say that a .223 is more accurate when fired from a .223 chamber, or from a Wiley chamber, why arguably is the best of both worlds when it's desired to use both of these rounds interchangeably in the same rifle without barrel changes.
do you think the throat angle would have mattered? dudes shooting at pretty much max velocity while being safe.
Just found your channel it's probably the only gun channel I wasn't subscribed to but now I am.
Hmm, and now it looks like you're "good to go" 👍
I already knew what the answers were going to be, but since RUclips went to the trouble of recommending your video to me, I thought it would be rude not to watch. And to tell you the truth, it was just going to be playing in the background while I cleaned out my desk drawer, but damn, your presentation and comedic flair got me actually watching this shit. Well done, dude, you made a video of which there are hundreds; 5.56 vs .223, interesting and funny!
Subbed.
Love these tests, thanks
Underrated channel!!
Just found your channel love the energy!
Great video! Me and My brother in law been going back and forth on this.
I love his videos. It’s nothing but shootings, results and minimum rambling! Great job!!
plugged this data into a ballistic chart. the difference in drop is 4.68 inches at 500 yards.
Bravo! Good Show!!
I can't help picturing Ray Romano every time I check your videos
You have one incredible set of vocal pipes. I could listen to you talk all day.
Like a second amendment Ray Romano.
He needs a sitcom style bass line. Awesome video 🎉
Weird?
I always like your test. You always use the ammo I own which it helps for my next ammo purchase or gun
Yep! Information that's practical, not just entertaining.
Nice objective analysis, much appreciated.
Proud of ya dude, been a fan for a while now. Glad you’re getting the views and recognition you deserve🤘🤘 keep ‘em rolling
I'd really love it if you could keep the chrono data up longer on screen. It's too fast to read averages and ft lbs and not super easy to rewind RUclips to pause it. Thanks for the videos! Love em
That was I was thinking and my only critique 😊
I had to go back and freeze the frame
I'm far from an expert in ballistics but I am surprised that 223 went thru a pressure treated 6x6. Good video keep up the great content. I learn something new every time
Thanks for the informative video!
I'm still waiting to see a splat test with that banana that keeps flying around. LOL, another great video. Stay safe and vigilant.
Congratulations! Greetings from Brazil.
Thanks. Great video. Very informative. Nor let's see the 556 VS a 300 blackout.
Not sure why I like watching and listening to these, but I must.😊
I wonder if this guy's voice would sound any different if he tried Helium ? Hahaha!
Great video
Or what if he was already on Helium ?? 😳
His voice is just pure bass frequencies without it@@waylonmccrae3546
He takes a few gulps of Sulfur Hexafluoride between takes. The stuff would make your mother sound like James Earl Jones.@@waylonmccrae3546
@@waylonmccrae3546lol
Now that's a test he needs to do
Love the video!
Thank you 😊
Dude, sled 4.0 is awesome. Nice catch in the back!
The difference in velocity on the boxes is because of how they are measured. For 5.56 the test is done with a 20” barrel, but for .223 a 24” barrel is used. When run through a 16” barrel, it’s typical to see lower velocities from .223 than 5.56.
Watching those fireballs makes me realize just how much work even the most basic of A2 birdcages can do to help the user experience!
I enjoy these videos!!! It was explained to me that the NATO rounds have a thicker throat to handle the material for the tracer rounds.
Very entertaining, thank you
I used to have a AR with the barrel that could shoot both rounds.i would often buy the .223 because it was cheaper.but was told the .556 had abit more power. This video definitely proves that information accurate
223 Wylde chamber, it makes your AR more versatile
Every AR can shoot both rounds. .223 and 5.56 ar interchangeable! If you disagree find me a gun that doesn't have a custom chamber that can't shoot both rounds all day everyday without any problems...
fire formed. once the round ignites, it will conform to the chamber. I think the casing on a 556 is not the same as the case on a 223. the volume is different, I have loaded range drops of both and never noticed a dif, but I really wasn't looking; I was too busy plinking and having fun. This was done in the before times when ammo was inexpensive. @@xephael3485
@xephael3485 thanks,I'm definitely no pro.i really didn't know all ARs shot both rounds
@@Herecomesthethruth It's possible you might run into accuracy issues with a .223 "chambered" firearm firing higher grain 5.56 but unlikely. Chamber the round and remove it... if you don't see any marks on the bullet from the lands, you're 100% fine.
I load both cartridges and with a little tinkering I got .223 up to 3050 out of a 16" 1/8 twist AR with 68GR BTHP bullets. Heavier bullet weights do well with faster twist.
I have a 1in 7 and a 1 on 9 and so for anything from 55grn to 75grn shot the same from either 🤔
You can typically load most ammunition WAY hotter and faster than box ammunition because #1 manufacturers skimp on powder to save money #2 manufacturers want to prioritize low chamber pressures fpr safety reasons to avoid potentially damaging somebody's old rifle.
It’s best to reload your own to whatever speed you want and weight of bullets
@philliphall5198 been doing that for 40+ years
When I am lucky enough to have a free day on the farm lol, m+y day consists of scouring the dark web in the morning for reloading supplies lol, IYKYK.. then down to the Dungeon for casing prep... (the most fun you can have with your reloading experience btw), then to the press.... then to bench. Pew pew pew.. then back to the tumbler lol
Great commercial for that tape company! I'll be looking for that type of tape the next time I send a package anywhere.
I hope you never stop doing the ''lets turn it around''- song. This is a trademark thing now.
That was sorta lifted from the song "Total Eclipse of the Heart" by Bonnie Tyler.
Love your videos one thing to consider about the sandbox is that after you shoot the first round or two rounds and you put a third or fourth one in there what’s not to say that that bullets has not collided with the other one that’s in the box just sitting there which could effect its momentum I know the odds are not real great that they’ll hit that leftover bullet in the sand but it could and it could skew the results
Look up run on sentence
@@HWG-wm8ldor even punctuation
Outstanding channel,SUBSCRIBED!!!!!!
Great Video! Thank You.
Appreciate this direct comparison
i bet u can do a killer Hank Hill impression
Up front: I would love to hear this dude try a death metal growl. I agree with the previous poster about radio DJ: seems like a natural fit. But the video about the actual differences between 223 and 5.56 was very welcome and appreciated. I didn't check the video info, but weapon system setup would probably lend more credence to the results. Great video overall, sir.
Finch! was wondering what you were up too! great vid
Thanks 👍
I believe it's "Time to Grind!" Some of the rust off them wangs my good sir lol
New segment called “it’s time to flap disk” lol
@@bananaballistics Permatex makes a rust converter in a spray can. 🙂
Evaporust works quite well, and is non-toxic, supposedly. Probably best to not drink it. It works faster when a little warmer, but if you have the time, just let them soak for a couple days. I am sure you can find videos explaining it in more depth.
@@andrewb6 Can confirm, not tasty but quite effective!
😂😂 that reduction joke was well done
He probably would have got more penetration with a longer bull barrel but that’s a different topic.
I really enjoy yr channel..I'm always l forward to the next one..
Great video - thanks
it seems like both rounds were fired out of a 5.56 chamber. the difference in 556 and 223 is the throat length. 556 has a nominal pressure of 55,000psi. 556 in a 223 chamber is 65,000psi {unsafe} 223 fired from a 556 chamber is 45,000psi {under performs}
What are you, a scientist?
@@guins99 Science is for everyone.
Chambering makes a big difference with these. I can absolutely confirm a difference with running 5.56 chamber along side .223 wylde. The velocity difference shows at point of impact.
@@rebeljamieson3414 yeah i didnt get it for a long time. the 223 chamber is "tighter" and "shorter" so it makes for a more accurate rifle, and the 556 is "looser" for reliability. Thats why 556 is loaded hotter to make up for the big ole chamber.
This debate is because of lazy/amateur people. Mostly lazy. And also military complex, thinking everything military must be better, no. The 223 is more tight and thus accurate. The advantage 556 has is that u can shoot both rounds out of 556 rifle but only 223 out of 223 rifle. I understand this is too complex for some.
Good testing. I still think the difference is negligible and 223 is cheaper than 556.
To quote some old guntuber, "Is there a difference? Yeah. Is it enough of a difference to MAKE a difference? You be the judge."
It's really not though... if you want for a sale they're essentially the same price.
Brother thank you for this video, very informative, and man your vocal folds are WILD. 😂
Thank you
First.
Difference is powder load and the chamber they’re fired in more than anything. Barrel length of .223Rem is usually 24” barrel as well. Where as 5.56 is usually 20”.
Jackets for M193 are supposed to also be different as well as the mean average and max spread of velocity.
Right on
Exactly. Velocities are from two different barrel lengths.
Jackets on military grade projectiles are typically thicker than civilian equivalents. It's quite possible the lead alloy in the core is different too. Sometimes, even USGI ammo will have bimetal jackets.
@donwyoming1936 this is all kinds of false
@@unclefreedom213 Please elaborate
Definitely false. Too many cnn reporters on here.
Winchester M193 with LC head stamp is the Same stuff as Winchester 556 USA head stamp. I bought 600 rounds of each but didn’t realize that 3 of the box’s were marked M193 and 3 were marked 556. Both were Winchester I got all OCD because the head stamps were different. So I put 10 rounds of each down my 20” AR and the velocities were different by 10 fps. Just a FYI for anyone who possibly did the same thing as me. Tested with the same Chronograph as in this video.
193 is a loading of 556 the two common loadings of 5.56 are m or xm193 and m or xm 855
mincheater runs the Lake City now but federal used to hence the LC head stamp
Thanks for running the test!
10 fps is easily within lot-to-lot variation, so your experiment shows they're basically identical.
@@ComprehensiveContext Or, to quote some elderly gentleman, "well within the variation from one ROUND to the next."
Using Pressure Treated Pine (Southern Yellow Pine) for these tests is iffy at best ! It's a species that's noted for extreme variations in hardness throughout the grain. Sometimes center punching the stuff can be a pain in the ass. If the point falls between the heartwood and sapwood the center punch can easily, and often will, drift off into the softwood and miss the point you want. Drilling the stuff exhibits the same properties.
Wakodahatchee Chris
Well done . Much appreciated to solve that common question.
There was an 85fps difference. "Is that enough difference to make a difference? You be the judge."
Terry the torso is a great addition to the family.
Very educational.
Good video. Really enjoyed it....
I have found, many occasions, where I'm actually getting higher velocities out of 223 ammo then out of some 556 ammo, depending on the lot or the manufacturer or other influences that cause changes in the way in which this particular round, the 55 grain Full Metal Jacket operates. Drawing the conclusion, where you pick up a 556 round and a 223 round and test only two rounds against each other, you would have to test dozens of different 223 marked ammo and 556 ammo. I'd like to point out to you, that the primary difference between 223 and 556 in their pressure allotments, happens to be because the military takes the pressure reading from a different point on the cartridge case then civilian testing procedures do. There is frequently if you thousand pounds of difference, if you go to the military testing you get over 10 or 12 thousand pounds difference are within each other's differentials from round to round.
That said, now you have to look at what mechanism they tested the rounds in. What length of test Barrel was it does it have the same resistance to the bullet traveling through it?
The difference from one barrel to the very next Barrel in manufacturer can sometimes be a couple of hundred feet per second.
The only thing that you are consistent with in this test is you happen to have two randomly selected 556 / 223 rounds, and you're testing them at least in the same firearm.
Considering the 55 grain Full Metal Jacket was specifically designed to produce Wicked wounding capability within 200 yards of a 20 inch barrel rifle with a 1 to 12, to 1 to 10 twist. And at that it is absolutely superb. I find this test virtually worthless tactical barrier fragment horribly. And are very rarely still able to produce any substantial wounding capability, to the extent that they can actually Force somebody to stop acting in a recalcitrant manner
Is that really this dudes voice? Is James Earl Jones his dad
WOW!!!!! THIS WAS AN INTERESTING SERIES OF COMPARISON TEST TARGETS!!! GOOD WORK!!!!
Awesome content as always. Being that I am a huge fan of 5.56 I really enjoyed this content especially see the actual difference of the 5.56 over the 223 there is not allot of content of the two calibers going head to head. however it would be nice to 5.7 vs 9mm and or even 5.7 vs 10mm I would just like to see the more prominent cartridge, before I decide on my next pdw
Paul Harrel did a 5.7 video into a meat target for the price you pay compared to 9mm it's lackluster. Also since I own all 3 I can tell you each has its use but 10mm is king out of the three if you can handle the recoil. Unless of course you wanna get into the merits of 5.7 vs soft armor discussion. But even then that is a very specific type of 5.7 you have to buy and it won't be cheap.
The Miami FBI 1986 bad guy used standard .223 FMJ, and so did Kyle Rittenhouse (he used Aguila 223 FMJ). The reality is that in real life at realistic ranges, there is not much difference between the two. The advantage of 223 is that it has less muzzle blast and flash and it is cheaper to practice with.
When you miss with your superior 5.7/10mm bs rounds because you can’t afford to practice, you’ll understand that 9mm is more than enough. Shot placement is everything.
the voice is why I'm subscribing :) now hope the content is good! haha
The rounds are only compatible in 5.56 chambers. A 223 chamber is cut differently and may or may not safely accept a 5.56 round. Either way, you risk a pressure spike if the projectile is contacting the lands. This is due to the 223 chamber typically having less free bore. Other factors may be at play, such as case wall thickness, bullet seating depth, or powder charge.
I'm glad my rifles all ended up having the 5.56 chambering, there has been so much confusion and debate over the various differences and safety that I'd get a headache if I had a 223 chamber. If nothing else I'd have to be careful not to mix the various 223/5.56 ammo I have on hand when shooting.
@@fiveowaf454 I have a bolt action 223 with a true 223 chamber, so I have to be careful what I feed it. If you aren't sure, have the chamber checked with a set of 5.56 Go/No Go gauges. They are different from 5.56 gauges. Some shooters scoff at the idea, but one only has to do a little internet research to determine the risk is real.
@@Paladin1873 Many seem to ignore the warnings and shoot any thing in their 223 chamberings. The thought of doing that would bother me, so as I say I'm glad I only have 5.56 chambers in the rifles I own of that type, because I have acquired quite a mix of 5.56 and 223, based on what ammo I could actually get during the shortages and at "sensible" prices, and it's been beneficial to be able to use both should a deal come up. Then you can get into the argument of the relative accuracy of the two rounds fired from the 5.56 chamber. If that's not enough controversy, then you can always start debating barrel twist rates and bullet weights ;) :)
Try X-Tac vs PMC Bronze, you should see a difference.
Yeah, they are magical. Goes through an Abrams.
"on the range with Burt"
You gotta sing for us, just a line
But great video, you get straight to the point!! Keep it up, youll grow
Would be very interesting to see .22 WMR 40-gr CCI Maxi-Mag FMJ from PMR-30 vs. 5.7x28 40-gr American Eagle FMJ from either Ruger 57, FN Five-seveN, PSA 5.7 Rock or S&W M&P 5.7!
Surely, both rounds would not penetrate even 1/4 mild steel, but what about different thickness plywood?
Do 5.7 vs 9 on your test, please?
That fiberglass on the sandbox was very clever
Fiberglass??... you mean the fiber-reinforced tape??
@jasono2139 Oh yeah, I guess I miss spoke.
Damn sir! You look great in a suit! Love the video!
Terri the torso... 😂 Love it ❤
The biggest advantage 5.56 has over .223 is the availability of more destructive factory loaded ammo. Since you can easily get 5.56 AP black tip ammo.
Easily get AP 5.56 in the usa? What is it called? I thought 5.56 AP was harder to find with the introduction of 5.56 "pistols" and the AP pistol ammo law.
Huh. Black tip 5.56? Even the Army doesn't have that.
Just another rube.
is that your real voice?
Some really torque-y bullets!
You’ve reinvented the Hesco barrier. Congrats.
This mans voice is not real
I think he is Ray Romano's son.
Are we ready to Rumble😅
He sounds just like Howard Stern....close your eyes and listen carefully!!! I swear, it's actually Stern😅
There was a cashier at our H.E.B. in my town and the guy used to talk like this. I would always get a kick out of it. I think his was that steroid voice though.
Awesome channel 👌
Very interesting 👍🏽
Nice shades!
Enjoyed it