This is so good. All your videos are incredible, well-written, and well-researched. Your channel should be way bigger. Just pledged to your Patreon. Keep it up!!
This channel is a tremendous little treasure trove of videos that are very well done. Absolutely agree that your channel deserves to be bigger than it currently is. Keep at it, fella, and hopefully the subscriber count begins to grow for you.
Thing with analytics is that things are always changing in every sport. A team gets an Ohtani and that changes how the game is played, so other teams dig into analytics to find an edge. Everyone follows that trend, and then one team finds a new edge. It's always evolving.
Ortiz made his clutch legend in the years 2005 and 2006, and in the 2004 and 2007 postseason. Look at his clutch numbers during THAT period - specifically during the 05-06 regular season. He was as clutch as a player has ever been during that stretch, and stats back it up. Obviously if you incorporate his twins time and his decline it more or less disappears, but look at THOSE numbers I’ve suggested and you will get it.
2002 is generally the peak of Moneyball. The system did outsmart baseball but it only works if you can also find a couple superstars who can take the team over the top. The way the A's and Beane ran it, you end up with what you saw in 2002...a team that has the potential to win a lot of games over the course of the season but get smoked in the playoffs year after year.
Playoff have always been a stupid way to judge the “best” team in any league. To judge a great team you need to analyze a large number of games in which all the teams play all the other teams in their league. Any team can get hot for a few weeks and win a limited series. This is why european soccer puts much more emphasis on winning the league and less on the cup competitions (Champions League cup is the exception because it is Europe wide competition). Playoffs have always been just a way for club owners to grab more money from TV and fans.
The lesson of moneyball is all wrong. The A's weren't successful because of their oddball acquisitions. They just drafted well and ended up with an elite starting rotation and phenomenal position players in Tejada and Chavez. They didn't win because of Scott Hatteberg.
If a guy is a 250 hitter who gets on base over 50% of the time you have to factor in luck I imagine which afaik goes against science And yet there's guys that consistently for that mold
This is so good. All your videos are incredible, well-written, and well-researched. Your channel should be way bigger. Just pledged to your Patreon. Keep it up!!
How does this video have only 10k views still. It’s so good
This channel has a ton of growth in front of it. Great work!
This channel is a tremendous little treasure trove of videos that are very well done.
Absolutely agree that your channel deserves to be bigger than it currently is. Keep at it, fella, and hopefully the subscriber count begins to grow for you.
Thing with analytics is that things are always changing in every sport. A team gets an Ohtani and that changes how the game is played, so other teams dig into analytics to find an edge. Everyone follows that trend, and then one team finds a new edge. It's always evolving.
Ortiz made his clutch legend in the years 2005 and 2006, and in the 2004 and 2007 postseason. Look at his clutch numbers during THAT period - specifically during the 05-06 regular season. He was as clutch as a player has ever been during that stretch, and stats back it up. Obviously if you incorporate his twins time and his decline it more or less disappears, but look at THOSE numbers I’ve suggested and you will get it.
Super underrated baseball page. Rly good content, man.
You videos are incredible, so glad that I found them
2002 is generally the peak of Moneyball. The system did outsmart baseball but it only works if you can also find a couple superstars who can take the team over the top. The way the A's and Beane ran it, you end up with what you saw in 2002...a team that has the potential to win a lot of games over the course of the season but get smoked in the playoffs year after year.
You really create great content!
❤ Love this content
Money ball is so fucking good, just as a movie. Brad can act his fucking ass off
Omg what a well made video, get those views dawg
Well done.
Great video, 👑
Playoff have always been a stupid way to judge the “best” team in any league. To judge a great team you need to analyze a large number of games in which all the teams play all the other teams in their league. Any team can get hot for a few weeks and win a limited series. This is why european soccer puts much more emphasis on winning the league and less on the cup competitions (Champions League cup is the exception because it is Europe wide competition). Playoffs have always been just a way for club owners to grab more money from TV and fans.
Europe 1st place overall means everything for a team to win. Murica 1st place overall means nothing for a team to win.
Well done
Im a new subscriber
great video even though i know nothing in baseball😅
The lesson of moneyball is all wrong. The A's weren't successful because of their oddball acquisitions. They just drafted well and ended up with an elite starting rotation and phenomenal position players in Tejada and Chavez. They didn't win because of Scott Hatteberg.
Rebuilding is a poor man’s strategy. Your team is a playoff contender but never a title contender.
Calling Moneyball a netflix docu is crazy
If a guy is a 250 hitter who gets on base over 50% of the time you have to factor in luck I imagine which afaik goes against science
And yet there's guys that consistently for that mold
Ortiz hit in front of Manny 🤔🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
They didnt win. They tried and did well considering with a great rotation, but they didnt win.
Nonsense.