I saw one review who has professional photography experience and he explained details in Sony this video comparison is good for non techie and no knowledge in photography
On my Xperia 1V I have the exposure set to -0.7 by default, otherwise almost all shots come out overexposed. It's so weird that Sony is incapable of fixing this issue
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
Why does Samsung get a point for looking more natural, isn't that personal preference? Also you barely talked about the Macro mode, there's a big difference between the both of them, one is with the Ultrawide and the other with the Telephoto. Happy that this video exists but it feels like a lot is missing.
@@synak1538 Lmao just take a picture in 200 mpx (on the Samsung) and crop in it 🤷🏻♂️. No need for any macro mode. And yes i used it on some phones and at first it was amazing but then after 2 days i never used it again 🤣. In my opinion telephoto lens is way more useful than putting your phone up against some food or whatever. Completely useless like i said.
@@alexgreg152 then you don’t understand my original comment. Sonys Macro Mode uses the Telephoto Sensor whereas Samsung uses the Ultrawide, which is why I said there is a big difference.
exposure level control does have for both phone. So i am not bothered about overexposure. Both phone has promode as well. Sony pics are more natural for me. Samsung potrait photos looks like cut out photos and doesn't matching back ground colour to subject
I think what people don't consider or these tech reviewers don't point out is reselling value.. when moving to new phone S24U will offer more value in trade in or easier to sell than Xperia phones... I don't think most people think of that just a little forward planning...
Yes, but why not simply buy a Sony camera, and avoid all the usual Sony mobile device software update problems that are well documented all over the internet?.
As an ex-Sony 1V user, I totally disagree with you. I'm a photographer, and the only useful lens is the main lens; all the other lenses are totally trash. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra Pro mode is miles better than the Sony manual photo results.
You forgot to add that the Sony is capable of 4k 120fps on ALL lenses, not just the main lens. Samsung is only able to shoot 4k 120fps on its main lens.
@@exfx8315 who cares:) the tele lens is useless for 120fps 4k, small sensor bad quality,. The UWW is a small sensor too, but it's a bit better than the zoom lens. If you want a good quality you have to shoot 120fps 4k with the main lense. Like others. In real life I have never used the other sensors for 120fps, only the main. Like 99% the other people do.
@@18yearsago88 I never said you could. My point was that the most average consumers aren't true photographers and won't transfer their videos on to a 4K capable device from their phone. All these specs are brainwashing people who are making a decision to buy an overpriced device based off of features they'll never use.
@@RAGINGINSOMNIA-o8e Agree, Galaxy AI is just a gimmick, no one would use it in real life. It's there to sway people into buying it even though it's a downgrade from the S23 Ultra.
The Sony also has many features no other smartphone has. 1. A dedicated shutter button with rock solid autofocus and eye tracking 2. A dedicated mini jack audio in and out port. 3. A 1.5 TB micro SD card slot. 4. A physical sim slot as well as e-sim. 4. No notch or camera hole on the screen which is a stunning display, arguably the best smartphone for watching a movie on. 5. 2 forward facing speakers. 6. Unbeatable wireless audio with full support for high fidelity audio (especially great with Sony's top end wireless over ear headphones.
What the, you guys missed the 2X macro tele the Xperia 1 VI able to reach that Samsung and iPhone can't and the Xperia optically reach 7.2 and you guys compare it base on Samsung's reach and not each other advantage sides!
it's a real world camera use comparison, most people in the real world aren't gna use only upto 7.2x if they can go further, and telemacro is basically useless
@@TheOneDanTek Telemacro has a 100% guarantee that it will be less distorted, and it isn't an image crop like from the Ultra wide, neither does your phone ruin your light soruce while shooting Telemacro.
@@TheOneDanTek in that logic, you will zoom into 100x, you buy the phone, you know it's limitation, you don't use it for what it don't have and what other phone have, this phone reached optically only to 7.1x so you use it that way and only further digitally when you have to, your logic is so flaw, what if the older phone that don't have zoom at all, you are so wrong
@@fa14bi-78 noone really uses macro, i personally have to take a pic of a bug, and that was once, but most normal people aint gna use macro for nothing
@@NetvoTV you typed that in one of the most confusing ways possible, but this is what i understood it as. your saying that because the s24u can zoom upto 100x, i will regularly use 100x, which i, personally, will, but most people wont. they may go further than 5x but no more than maybe 20x. if you bought the sony you might go more than 7.2x but no more 15x. in short im saying that just because the best quality is 5 or 7.2x, doesnt mean people are only going to go up to those numbers if they buy that phone
@@ricianobommel4298 just because Samsung uses Sony sensors don't make partners. They are competitors only Samsung is focusing on the average consumers while Sony is focusing on a niche market. They have a headphone jack, sd slot and an uninterrupted screen. To get great shots you'll have to manually adjust. But imo they've made a mistake with the 1vi. As that niche wants a 4k 21:9 screen
@@ricianobommel4298lmfao , actually not ,,, Sony is for photography, you need some time and the photo would be better than Samsung. Sony has basically better picture quality than samsung. Sony has much better colour processing than samsung also more manual tweaking features , she didn't even mention the best features of sony . Definitely a baised video .
you Didn't mention that Xperia 1vi can recording slow motion 4k 120fps in all lenses But Samsung s24 ultra only with 1 lense However, a point is awarded to Samsung Because recording full hd 240 fps ? Reasons like these make people think that Xperia phones is Weak In fact Xperia phones Oppressed
Do u ever used a professional camera? Sony is not for u. It’s only for pro users and photographers who can take photos like a pro. It’s not for clicking in auto mode 😅
Not just that it’s much better build quality than other Android. I have a iPhone 14 Pro and recently picked a S24 and replacing the S24 with Sony as well.
@ 3:50 you look like a villain on Samsung portrait mode. I think that's more concerning than some shirt details. Sony exposes portrait mode for face, that's why it's blowing out.
You must be color-blind to give Crapsung any point for a true to life photography! Sony never listened to its die hard fans to improve their JPEG's processing and its HDR, but still it's better! This test is much too subjective and useless overall...
Deym Sony is always underrated, this video comparison is for non techie and no photography experience I always watched the other guy who review about camera phone and he explained details about sony.
i have been an xperia user for last 6 years. One thing i can tell you guys. With the iphones and samsungs and other phones, the phone decides how the pictures will be and you pretty much cannot do anything to make it the way you want it to look. Whereas In the sony YOU choose how you want it to look. Sony is for the person who knows what exactly their pictures should look like. All the other phones are for people who don't mind the phone controlling their pictures' looks as long as the user looks good in the pictures. It is like choosing to make a home cooked meal where each and every ingredient is chosen by you, vs eating at a restaurant. There is no way someone doesn't like how restaurant food tastes. But sure one can mess up a home cooked meal.
@@ÑôusyyļIeù It's not a myth. I'm a professional photographer using a Nikon system as my main system and the xperia when I don't have the Nikon with me. If you're talking about some level of processing, then it is very debatable. Because then even if you're shouting film, the chemicals in the film and the processing method will determine how the prints will turn out. So no matter what camera you use. Each and every camera "processes" the look and can never exactly reproduce the real scene.
Enough yapping bro i also have xperia 1 mark 3 my friend have 1 mark 5 and my friend is a photographer he recommend me sony phone we bought our phones same day and we both were disappointed by the camera even a photographer Who uses sony phone says camera is bad
in the stock app maybe, but you can shoot more natural photos on other devices too. Also Sony doesn't give their better sensors for UW and zoom. It's a pity as they do many things right
Did not mention and compare 30 fps, eye tracking, animal eye tracking AI, ergonomics movement AI tracking capability Telemacro capability. Sunlight vision test both displays under sun.
Sony smartphones are not for every user. its function as a smartphone with a pro camera where you can make all the adjustments almost like a professional camera, no other smartphone can have this function. Sony manages to do this masterfully. Its cameras are not configured in standard AI mode like iPhone Samsung and Xiaomi and other models.
What do u mean over exposed? Well dunno what u r seeing but Sony makes the best cameras therefore Samsung has no chance: u can compare both phones in other aspects but on cameras? Forget it. Just like comparing a MB c-class to a Lexus IS naa
Wow, is this the first time you take photos and videos, and how much did Samsung pay? For a start, why didn't you adjust exposure, why is overexposed better than natural (and when you claim Galaxy for being more 'natural', you gives point although its got dark shadows), and why didn't you use the telemacro mode on Xperia? Ob of the worst 'comparisons' ever...
Unfair competition. 😂😂.. Ai camera from samsung vs Real Camera System from Sony. If you compare the camera make sure to compare every capabilities like the PRO mode. Also when it comes to zoom, sony only uses 7.5x at its best because we all know samsung uses ai to every lenses for zooming 😂 better not compare it.
Since I want something other than a Samsung that still supports a memory card and a headphone jack, the Xperia 1 VI is the best option out there right now.
You guys n gals did this review a little too soon. The new Xperia 1 VI isn't finished. The Camera app is new and still unfinished and the 3 pro apps from the mark V are not yet ported over to the mark VI. There is an anticipated major firmware update coming this month or soon thereafter which will bring the pro features to the new Camera app or will port the previous pro apps to the new phone. i would revisit this test after that update. I bet most of the issues will be gone. The mark V is still a better stills photography shooter than the mark 6 in many ways because of this. It'll be here soon.
@@carver9312 even my s20 fe 5g is better and there is Hdr 10 video mode makes details less sharpend and lights more realstic also i have motion camera pro app its capture Raw video in selfi and back cameras in raw details are comparable with dslr
@@carver9312I guess someone who doesn't know how professional photography works. Go try a professional camera and let us see if you can perfectly expose all scenery.
Sony is incredible if it's about manual camera settings which beats all phones. It's for someone who knows how to use manual set while Samsung is for those who use auto all the time
The over exposure on the Sony is not really acceptable considering it's price; but can the exposure be manually changed even when in auto mode?. I can do this on my S23 Ultra, and this ability is invaluable to me when shooting video outdoors especially.
i think a software update can fix the white balance and exposure compensation metrics......this time sony had touted a better improved telephoto lens from 85 to 170 mm but i think it needs more improvement and sharpening....the audio also got a boost but slightly pales in comparison with the galaxy......nice work.....👍
Weird they didn't say anything about Xperia 1 VI's Telezoom Macro. It blows all the competition out of the water. Still, as others also say - the Sony is better for the people leaning towards photography.- I sold my S24 Ultra to get the Xperia 1 VI, and I haven't regret it. I love the Samsung, but as a wannabe photographer, there is just more that I appreciate with the Sony. First, and most easily, the dedicated proper shutterbutten. You half-press it to focus, and then complete-press it to shoot. I love that. And of course it's auto-focus capabilities is beyond compare.
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
One thing I noticed about this channel is that they occasionally missed out on several important phone features from their deduction...and I have watched a few. But I get it, Samsung won at run and gun scenarios. If people wanted to justify fiddling manual settings like iso shutter speeds, strapping on an ND filter then why bother, just get an actual camera. Samsung won this round. Out of all Android manufacturer, Samsung IMHO have the best software optimisation/features second to iPhones.
![It can do it all: Sony Xperia 1 VI [review]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cY46jgTSSJM/mqdefault.jpg)
It's funny that you give Samsung color scores when Sony always maintains color fidelity
I saw one review who has professional photography experience and he explained details in Sony this video comparison is good for non techie and no knowledge in photography
On my Xperia 1V I have the exposure set to -0.7 by default, otherwise almost all shots come out overexposed. It's so weird that Sony is incapable of fixing this issue
The reason of why I personally don't like Sony phones. They software are weird.
Old aged for manual users.
is funny, on my Sony A7IV i have to set the exposure to +0.7 for them to be not underexposed
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
It doesn't say much for Sony's software abilities does it?. Which is no surprise. Same old Sony. Overpriced devices with abysmal software support.
Interesting, on OP12 -0,7 is also the sweetspot
2:42, the distortion of her shoes on samsung is crazy. LOL
yeah. I saw that. Her shoe is like 1/2 length from knee to the end of feet. :D
And without forgetting that the Xperia can shoot slow mo in all three lenses.
Xperia can shoot 4k 120 on all lenses compared to only 1 in the galaxy???
The Galaxy can use AI to turn ANY video in slow-mo tho
@@YgorCortesGalaxy always step ahead❤
Cool but no one cares.
SONY is winner .. Samsung photos are over processed photos ..
This time sony ended up having over processed photos from time to time, which really surprised me
yet the S24 Ultra still manages to look better most of the time especially in terms of controlling exposure and shadows.
Bruh..! Really ? Biased
Ever heard about Pro mode?
Why does Samsung get a point for looking more natural, isn't that personal preference? Also you barely talked about the Macro mode, there's a big difference between the both of them, one is with the Ultrawide and the other with the Telephoto. Happy that this video exists but it feels like a lot is missing.
Samsung paid her probably.
Because no one cares about macro mode ? This the most useless feature on a phone.
@@alexgreg152 you’ve never used macro before then
@@synak1538 Lmao just take a picture in 200 mpx (on the Samsung) and crop in it 🤷🏻♂️. No need for any macro mode. And yes i used it on some phones and at first it was amazing but then after 2 days i never used it again 🤣. In my opinion telephoto lens is way more useful than putting your phone up against some food or whatever. Completely useless like i said.
@@alexgreg152 then you don’t understand my original comment. Sonys Macro Mode uses the Telephoto Sensor whereas Samsung uses the Ultrawide, which is why I said there is a big difference.
I have S24 Ultra and in 4K 60fps ultrawide it stutters and sometimes fail to record a video. I had to switch to 4K 30fps.
it's clear that Sony devices are more suitable for photographers
No. Photographers use quality cameras, not an overpriced mobile device from a company with very poor software quality.
Sony
I'd like to see a RAW test to see which phone gets the most usable info from the RAW output.
Samsung is the best
With such a ridicuolous £1,333.99 price tag (£989.00 Samsung S24U) this Experia is born to die
Not fair!! In fact all sony pictures and videos much better than samasung
Samsung is still the best. You can zoom in the picture with clear and detailed shots.
exposure level control does have for both phone. So i am not bothered about overexposure. Both phone has promode as well. Sony pics are more natural for me. Samsung potrait photos looks like cut out photos and doesn't matching back ground colour to subject
I think what people don't consider or these tech reviewers don't point out is reselling value.. when moving to new phone S24U will offer more value in trade in or easier to sell than Xperia phones... I don't think most people think of that just a little forward planning...
Maybe you should try reviewing nail polish instead of smartphone cameras...
Completely disregarding the telemacro capabilities of 1 VI is criminal
Why is color exaggeration an advantage and color accuracy for Galaxy, but it's a negative score for Xperia? This type of scoring is questionable
What do you expect from that woman? Totally bias comparison
went with the xperia, such a good device, sd card and jack too!
as a xperia user it's not much suitable for straight out phone photo people. for those people who love photography, such an excellent device!
Exactly, it's not for normal users. Sony said it's made for photographers not dumb people like this woman
bcoz' most people only point and shoot. .
For people who loves photograpy, must use ViVO-OPPO-Xiaomi. Sony loser even in pro mode
Yes, but why not simply buy a Sony camera, and avoid all the usual Sony mobile device software update problems that are well documented all over the internet?.
As an ex-Sony 1V user, I totally disagree with you. I'm a photographer, and the only useful lens is the main lens; all the other lenses are totally trash. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra Pro mode is miles better than the Sony manual photo results.
Why are you in all the photos. People take photos not only of people. Just a landscape photos or macro photos comparison would be better.
You forgot to add that the Sony is capable of 4k 120fps on ALL lenses, not just the main lens. Samsung is only able to shoot 4k 120fps on its main lens.
@@exfx8315 who cares:) the tele lens is useless for 120fps 4k, small sensor bad quality,. The UWW is a small sensor too, but it's a bit better than the zoom lens. If you want a good quality you have to shoot 120fps 4k with the main lense. Like others. In real life I have never used the other sensors for 120fps, only the main. Like 99% the other people do.
You can't even watch 4K on the Sony screen.
You can't on samsung either ???😊@@RAGINGINSOMNIA-o8e
@@18yearsago88 I never said you could. My point was that the most average consumers aren't true photographers and won't transfer their videos on to a 4K capable device from their phone. All these specs are brainwashing people who are making a decision to buy an overpriced device based off of features they'll never use.
@@RAGINGINSOMNIA-o8e Agree, Galaxy AI is just a gimmick, no one would use it in real life. It's there to sway people into buying it even though it's a downgrade from the S23 Ultra.
The Sony also has many features no other smartphone has. 1. A dedicated shutter button with rock solid autofocus and eye tracking 2. A dedicated mini jack audio in and out port. 3. A 1.5 TB micro SD card slot. 4. A physical sim slot as well as e-sim. 4. No notch or camera hole on the screen which is a stunning display, arguably the best smartphone for watching a movie on. 5. 2 forward facing speakers. 6. Unbeatable wireless audio with full support for high fidelity audio (especially great with Sony's top end wireless over ear headphones.
This is the worst and most superficial comparison I have seen. Not even mentioning the telemacro mode and pro mode of the Sony.
Just accept the result and pray that Sony can improve their software quality. It can even over expose in macro mode by the way.
Sony is garbage & outdated, even plastic fans like you won't buy it.
@@neilmcguinness4422 samsung fanboy
Cause 90% the auto mode is used.....and the pro mode is only a half pro mode without a variable aperture.
And Sony overexposes everywhere 😂
Sony is garbage, just accept it
What the, you guys missed the 2X macro tele the Xperia 1 VI able to reach that Samsung and iPhone can't and the Xperia optically reach 7.2 and you guys compare it base on Samsung's reach and not each other advantage sides!
it's a real world camera use comparison, most people in the real world aren't gna use only upto 7.2x if they can go further, and telemacro is basically useless
@@TheOneDanTek Telemacro has a 100% guarantee that it will be less distorted, and it isn't an image crop like from the Ultra wide, neither does your phone ruin your light soruce while shooting Telemacro.
@@TheOneDanTek in that logic, you will zoom into 100x, you buy the phone, you know it's limitation, you don't use it for what it don't have and what other phone have, this phone reached optically only to 7.1x so you use it that way and only further digitally when you have to, your logic is so flaw, what if the older phone that don't have zoom at all, you are so wrong
@@fa14bi-78 noone really uses macro, i personally have to take a pic of a bug, and that was once, but most normal people aint gna use macro for nothing
@@NetvoTV you typed that in one of the most confusing ways possible, but this is what i understood it as. your saying that because the s24u can zoom upto 100x, i will regularly use 100x, which i, personally, will, but most people wont. they may go further than 5x but no more than maybe 20x. if you bought the sony you might go more than 7.2x but no more 15x. in short im saying that just because the best quality is 5 or 7.2x, doesnt mean people are only going to go up to those numbers if they buy that phone
9:55
Sony's Telephoto-macro: "Am I a joke to you!"
Clear win for xperia there
Always Xperia phone is my choice as when its in my hand no any phone can stand on my way due to lots of manual control. Good job miss.
You didn't give any more credit to the macro shots on the Xperia as it is one of its main new features.
Samsung and Sony are Partners, Samsung is the Overal better Camera and it beats the iphone 15 Pro Max, Samsung uses Sony Camera Sensors and Lenses😎
@@ricianobommel4298 just because Samsung uses Sony sensors don't make partners.
They are competitors only Samsung is focusing on the average consumers while Sony is focusing on a niche market.
They have a headphone jack, sd slot and an uninterrupted screen.
To get great shots you'll have to manually adjust.
But imo they've made a mistake with the 1vi.
As that niche wants a 4k 21:9 screen
@@ricianobommel4298all smartphone companies are competitors
@@ricianobommel4298still both are competitors
@@ricianobommel4298lmfao , actually not ,,, Sony is for photography, you need some time and the photo would be better than Samsung. Sony has basically better picture quality than samsung.
Sony has much better colour processing than samsung also more manual tweaking features , she didn't even mention the best features of sony .
Definitely a baised video .
rubish comparison
Cry. 😂😂😂😂
Because samsung uses ai software help and Sony only uses its hardware part more ❤
you Didn't mention that Xperia 1vi can recording slow motion 4k 120fps in all lenses But Samsung s24 ultra only with 1 lense However, a point is awarded to Samsung Because recording full hd 240 fps ?
Reasons like these make people think that Xperia phones is Weak
In fact Xperia phones Oppressed
This is wrong on all levels..
we all know Sony's Automode is good but not excellent. But just try the Pro Mode and you'll get amazing shots 🗿😮💨
the sony has better results you just have to know the usefulness!
Do u ever used a professional camera?
Sony is not for u. It’s only for pro users and photographers who can take photos like a pro.
It’s not for clicking in auto mode 😅
When a newb makes a comparison video 🤣
wtf, bro you definitely turned off stabilization on samsung🤦♂️🤦♂️6:08
Sony is the best
Still sony for me upgraded camera,sd card, headphone jack and better battery life..🥰
Better battery life? How
But you can't buy
Not just that it’s much better build quality than other Android. I have a iPhone 14 Pro and recently picked a S24 and replacing the S24 with Sony as well.
Sony bettery life very bad...
Those are nice perks
It should be much much cheaper though being that the cameras just aren't that great
Always sony xperia is the best
@ 3:50 you look like a villain on Samsung portrait mode. I think that's more concerning than some shirt details. Sony exposes portrait mode for face, that's why it's blowing out.
Ich habe nach 30 Sekunden ausgeschaltet 😅.... Sony macht deutlich bessere und natürlichere Fotos und Samsung genau das Gegenteil.
let's talk about editing. which one gives me more control when i try to edit the pictures? ans- Sony.
How were you able to take a 30x pictures with the Sony when it doesn't go past 21.3x ?
Sony is better.
You must be color-blind to give Crapsung any point for a true to life photography! Sony never listened to its die hard fans to improve their JPEG's processing and its HDR, but still it's better! This test is much too subjective and useless overall...
Deym Sony is always underrated, this video comparison is for non techie and no photography experience I always watched the other guy who review about camera phone and he explained details about sony.
i have been an xperia user for last 6 years. One thing i can tell you guys. With the iphones and samsungs and other phones, the phone decides how the pictures will be and you pretty much cannot do anything to make it the way you want it to look. Whereas In the sony YOU choose how you want it to look. Sony is for the person who knows what exactly their pictures should look like. All the other phones are for people who don't mind the phone controlling their pictures' looks as long as the user looks good in the pictures. It is like choosing to make a home cooked meal where each and every ingredient is chosen by you, vs eating at a restaurant. There is no way someone doesn't like how restaurant food tastes. But sure one can mess up a home cooked meal.
That's a myth sony also processes the photos
@@ÑôusyyļIeù It's not a myth. I'm a professional photographer using a Nikon system as my main system and the xperia when I don't have the Nikon with me. If you're talking about some level of processing, then it is very debatable. Because then even if you're shouting film, the chemicals in the film and the processing method will determine how the prints will turn out. So no matter what camera you use. Each and every camera "processes" the look and can never exactly reproduce the real scene.
Enough yapping bro i also have xperia 1 mark 3 my friend have 1 mark 5 and my friend is a photographer he recommend me sony phone we bought our phones same day and we both were disappointed by the camera even a photographer Who uses sony phone says camera is bad
in the stock app maybe, but you can shoot more natural photos on other devices too. Also Sony doesn't give their better sensors for UW and zoom. It's a pity as they do many things right
Sony is slick !
Did not mention and compare 30 fps, eye tracking, animal eye tracking AI, ergonomics movement AI tracking capability Telemacro capability. Sunlight vision test both displays under sun.
WOW 👑SONY GOD FOREVER 🥇✌️👑
Paid trolling by 👑Sony competitors. ☠️☠️samsung☠️☠️ lost and is dead. 👑Sony Best Forever
sam is the king of phone camera ❤
It wins this test, but a quality Chinese device will wipe the floor with it photography-wise.
Sony smartphones are not for every user. its function as a smartphone with a pro camera where you can make all the adjustments almost like a professional camera, no other smartphone can have this function. Sony manages to do this masterfully. Its cameras are not configured in standard AI mode like iPhone Samsung and Xiaomi and other models.
You didnt use macro with manual - much closer.
What do u mean over exposed? Well dunno what u r seeing but Sony makes the best cameras therefore Samsung has no chance: u can compare both phones in other aspects but on cameras? Forget it. Just like comparing a MB c-class to a Lexus IS naa
I still chose Sony.
Wow, is this the first time you take photos and videos, and how much did Samsung pay? For a start, why didn't you adjust exposure, why is overexposed better than natural (and when you claim Galaxy for being more 'natural', you gives point although its got dark shadows), and why didn't you use the telemacro mode on Xperia? Ob of the worst 'comparisons' ever...
Unfair competition. 😂😂.. Ai camera from samsung vs Real Camera System from Sony. If you compare the camera make sure to compare every capabilities like the PRO mode. Also when it comes to zoom, sony only uses 7.5x at its best because we all know samsung uses ai to every lenses for zooming 😂 better not compare it.
She literally showed you who won on the thumbnail😂
Since I want something other than a Samsung that still supports a memory card and a headphone jack, the Xperia 1 VI is the best option out there right now.
Xperia over Galaxy always!
Lmao keep wishing 😂.
You guys n gals did this review a little too soon. The new Xperia 1 VI isn't finished. The Camera app is new and still unfinished and the 3 pro apps from the mark V are not yet ported over to the mark VI. There is an anticipated major firmware update coming this month or soon thereafter which will bring the pro features to the new Camera app or will port the previous pro apps to the new phone. i would revisit this test after that update. I bet most of the issues will be gone. The mark V is still a better stills photography shooter than the mark 6 in many ways because of this. It'll be here soon.
Sony cemera king ❤😊
There is no 30x on the Sony 😂 stupid comparison. Galaxy oversaturates and oversharpens images like they've always done.
I am still gonna go with the Sony because it is more natural and more professional.
Blowing out highlights is natural?
@@carver9312 even my s20 fe 5g is better and there is Hdr 10 video mode makes details less sharpend and lights more realstic also i have motion camera pro app its capture Raw video in selfi and back cameras in raw details are comparable with dslr
@carver9312 I mean the pro mode section is way better on the sony
Professional photography isn't in the AI photography, it is all about pro mode
@@carver9312I guess someone who doesn't know how professional photography works. Go try a professional camera and let us see if you can perfectly expose all scenery.
Use the Xperia's camera functionality as it was intended and then do a comparison. This is why I don't regard these video reviews as worthwhile.
Samsung blues are too saturated and look artificial. Sharpening is awful too.
Sony is incredible if it's about manual camera settings which beats all phones. It's for someone who knows how to use manual set while Samsung is for those who use auto all the time
Sony 1VI is better than IPhone 15 pro max, and S24 ultra is better than both of them.
A fancy phone with AI features suits her very well.🙌😂📸
The over exposure on the Sony is not really acceptable considering it's price; but can the exposure be manually changed even when in auto mode?. I can do this on my S23 Ultra, and this ability is invaluable to me when shooting video outdoors especially.
HDR is off in portrait and in videos by default
It's a Blind test🤡🤝.
Veganism should be supported by ceratane. Ozzie had a sharper vision.
Why This Video feels like it's biased towards Samsung
Samsung best🎉
Sony N1
This comparison is clearly designed to favor Samsung. It's no exaggeration to call it stealth marketing by Samsung.
Shut up
Sony looks better to me lol 😂😂😂😂, I guess it is personal preference in the end
Samsung is a kid to Sony .. seriously.. u should do the job in pro mode
😂
Meny thing's from sony it's better than samsung I don't know why she's thing samsung is good
Sony🤝Samsung
i think a software update can fix the white balance and exposure compensation metrics......this time sony had touted a better improved telephoto lens from 85 to 170 mm but i think it needs more improvement and sharpening....the audio also got a boost but slightly pales in comparison with the galaxy......nice work.....👍
Nice review
Sony Xperia took better photos and videos than samsung.
You Just don't know how to use it , end of the story
Once you use Sony in manual mode samsung will be crying in. Corner 😅
Weird they didn't say anything about Xperia 1 VI's Telezoom Macro. It blows all the competition out of the water.
Still, as others also say - the Sony is better for the people leaning towards photography.- I sold my S24 Ultra to get the Xperia 1 VI, and I haven't regret it. I love the Samsung, but as a wannabe photographer, there is just more that I appreciate with the Sony. First, and most easily, the dedicated proper shutterbutten. You half-press it to focus, and then complete-press it to shoot. I love that. And of course it's auto-focus capabilities is beyond compare.
wth, Samsung's photo n videos are overproccessed
Sony Xperia 1Vl better than Samsung s 24 ultra
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
You cant do macro in PRO mode how come no "reviewer" found that? Also no 360 panoramas anymore and no one says that?
One thing I noticed about this channel is that they occasionally missed out on several important phone features from their deduction...and I have watched a few. But I get it, Samsung won at run and gun scenarios. If people wanted to justify fiddling manual settings like iso shutter speeds, strapping on an ND filter then why bother, just get an actual camera. Samsung won this round. Out of all Android manufacturer, Samsung IMHO have the best software optimisation/features second to iPhones.
Samsung galaxy s23 ultra Best 👌🏽👌🏽
Sony company making camera how you campare 😂
Sony is great but you need to use some option, it's not great for people that use auto photo only
Crazy smartphone manual monstrers Xperia 1 Mark 3-4-5-6
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iphones history😎,Samsung😎