SSG24, Bar 10, TAC 41, SRS a1, KC 02 airsoft sniper test 60 m

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 авг 2022

Комментарии • 27

  • @gbctv889
    @gbctv889 Год назад +6

    SRS a1 for the win

  • @JTK639
    @JTK639 Год назад +1

    Hi.Firstly the music you used is spot on😎💎💎💎💎👍.Your demonstrating the differant rifles is so useful+you have a Nice garden 😁

  • @liviucasuneanu8516
    @liviucasuneanu8516 Год назад +3

    That SRS sounds amazing

  • @GrandadSniper
    @GrandadSniper Год назад

    beautifully done 👌

  • @BiG_1977
    @BiG_1977 Год назад +2

    I think 1 or 2 misses is not a big deal. The main idea is that you have to fine tune your hop-up, buy a good quality inner barrel and hop-up rubber, make sure you have good air seal and you are set. The rest is just aesthetics.
    Nice video.👍

  • @gergelydosa9654
    @gergelydosa9654 Год назад

    Nagyon sok munka van a videóban.
    A fegyverek mese.
    Le a kalappal!!!
    Ügyes vagy és elszánt

  • @rdb9936
    @rdb9936 Год назад +5

    Great testing and well presented! From your testing across multiple platforms what have you found has been the biggest factor in long range consistency? I recently got a Tridos TDC and that has been the final piece of the puzzle for me - groupings have just tightened up that extra little bit, making those long range shots reliable and consistent

    • @Uria-jz1gu
      @Uria-jz1gu 6 месяцев назад

      the main difference in range and accuracy for high end snipers is the energy output. Their are too close to the physical limit of what you can achieve at such low energy with a round projectile for any difference to have anything but a marginal impact on performance. For exemple in this test, you cannot conclude anything from the result you see (putting aside the kc02 which have an inherent disadvantage) : their all hit their target, and the hit rate on such low sample is too small to exclude any difference to be anything but statistical fluctuation.

    • @joekkez93
      @joekkez93 4 месяца назад

      @@Uria-jz1gu Power output does matter, but also the consistency matters a lot too when it comes to overall accuracy. If you fluctuate like 5 fps you will be more accurate then gun which shoots higher fps but consistency is bad. Also, you can reach very long ranges even with like 2 Joule vs 3 Joule, if your hop up is properly set up (flat hop/R-hop etc) and you got the right weight BB. When you upgrade the power higher and higher, at some point comes the problem of finding heavy enough bbs. I mean at 3 Joule mark you should already use the .45 or heavier usually. Also with the snipers you gotta really test the volume of the cylinder - barrel length to get the optimal results. So it's basically science at this point. With right combo, I got 2.8 J (5 fps fluctuation) with my L96 and could get easily accurate shots up to 120 meters basically.

    • @Uria-jz1gu
      @Uria-jz1gu 4 месяца назад

      @@joekkez93 high end sniper are consistent by definition. They all use heavy bbs (above .43), most of the time their all have same type of bucking, with the same type of nub, perferct air seal... So across the world, the only thing distinguishing 'competitive' sniper's range is the power output. On the same field, at a given day : its... nothing. You are running your nice l96 : this dud is running a fully build vsr, another guy a tac, another one a srs and so everyone has the same range and accuracy

  • @erbobolazzo3743
    @erbobolazzo3743 Год назад +4

    I find this video interesting but this test can't be related to all countries/fields with specific regulations to stay below 1 or 2 jouls seeing that you're guns are going at mostly 500+ fps

  • @ashnguyen2950
    @ashnguyen2950 Год назад

    Nice video Dániel!

  • @TrungTheMaker
    @TrungTheMaker Год назад +3

    Loved the music and the testing was well done. Could use a more zoomed scope cam but over 10out10 awesome video!

  • @mornedutoit6835
    @mornedutoit6835 7 месяцев назад

    Numbers don't lie.👌

  • @Raz_Tactical
    @Raz_Tactical 11 месяцев назад

    Very nice test. If you ever do another one in the future try using a gun rest to keep better consistency. It will remove any shaking you have have reducing the human error element in the accuracy

  •  Год назад +1

    Nagyon jó videó, örülük hogy múltkor együtt játszottunk Szentendrén.

    • @danielkoronczi8159
      @danielkoronczi8159  Год назад +2

      Örülök, hogy tetszik. Most készül a 80m-es változat.

    • @youTieDxD
      @youTieDxD Год назад

      @@danielkoronczi8159 Kc 02-re vagyok kiváncsi 100m-en

    • @danielkoronczi8159
      @danielkoronczi8159  Год назад +1

      Már kész a videó. Ma megpróbálom feltölteni. Az eredmény engem is meglepett.

  • @OndrejTrnka
    @OndrejTrnka 6 месяцев назад

    i am missing a cross or a dot where was you aiming all the time. But still good video.

  • @c3493588
    @c3493588 2 месяца назад

    can you test VSR 10 ? really want to see it

  • @diegocastillogutierrezrave1034

    Better?

  • @SparkyMTB
    @SparkyMTB Год назад +2

    I’m sure Novritsch will be happy to hear your results 😅

  • @rubiooo56
    @rubiooo56 Год назад

    How many Joules with 0.48? Error... Joule Creep exist

    • @danielkoronczi8159
      @danielkoronczi8159  Год назад +3

      I calculated it to be 2.8-2.9 joules, but I will measure it when I have time.

  • @ldgarius
    @ldgarius 8 месяцев назад +1

    The heck, how are you even measuring. If it's with .2g, first mistake, you're not acounting to the almost 100 fps of joule creep you will be getting with propper ammo. If it's with .45+ as you should be using, you're way so out of left field shooting hot that at those distances it should have even better success rate. Either way, you're misrepresenting reality for the viewers.