sir, i have problem with (income expense) method when i solve this below method. Statements: All the windows are doors. No door is a wall. Conclusions: Some windows are walls. No wall is a door. A. Only (1) conclusion follows B. Only (2) conclusion follows C. Either (1) or (2) follows D. Neither (1) nor (2) follows E. Both (1) and (2) follow answer: when iam using ie method is (E).but when iam using vendiagram method is (B)
@CareerRide No apple is an orange. All bananas are oranges. (a) All apples are oranges (b) Some apples are oranges (c) No apple is a banana (d) None of the above Ans: according to income expenditure method BOTH A & C are correct But ans of this question on every website OPTIONS A How it possible Plz sirrr explain me
I discovered this channel last year during May for the MAT exams and did your classes and got 90 percentile within 15 days. Now I am using it for placement preparation.
You are so great, especially today because where utube channels do extensive advertisement more than teaching, it is actually very difficult to find teachers who actually teach....Thankyou!!
This is an appreciation message:- today was my MPSET paper, bht dino se logical reasoning mene khud se try kia bht videoes dekhe mjhse ek question nhi bna but kl raat ye video dekhi methods sikhi nd aaj ye confirm he ki logical reasoning k saare quest.shi krk aai hu..... Thank you so much sir sch me ek accha teacher student ki problems fraction of second me solve kr deta he.....thnku so so much for this lecture
At first I thought, using income and expenditure method makes the problem complex... But trust me...it really helps to reduce the complexities and can be solved in sec... Thank you for making such a wonderful content🥰
@@sejalshinde533 Income: 1) tricks=100, gimmicks=50 2) mimic=100, gimmick=100 Expenditure: 1) Trick= 100, gimmick= 100 2) gimmick=50, tricks=100 1st conclusion is wrong as expenditure of gimmick is more than income 2nd statement is true as income=expenditure
I wanna say, it was amazing & supremely great....I thought I didn't have any capacity to understand logical reasoning,,,,I lost hope when I used to study alone with the help of book but this teacher helped me to build my confidence up, thank you sir#
I always used to skip this topic while writing RBI/SBI mock examinations but now I can score 5/5 in this topic. Thank you for the crystal clear explanation. Hope this helps me in upcoming examinations.
How do you apply mock test? How much per test? Any suggestions? Btw, if you don't mind have you selected in any of the job you've mention? (Just curious)
STATEMENTS All chilies are garlics. Some garlics are onions. All onions are potatoes. No potato is ginger. CONCLUSIONS 1; Some chilies are potatoes 2; No onion is ginger. Sir as per your income expenditure method the answer i got was only conclusion 1 is correct but the correct answer is ,only conclusion 2 follows , if you could please clarify on this
@@abhaigopinath6338Some chillies won't be potato as the sentence is not definitely true... it's a possibility that some chillies can be potato...but here in conclusion possibility is not given... it's a direct sentence and so this conclusion is wrong!! The second one...No Potato is Ginger which means No Ginger is Potato... Onion comes under Potato...All onions are Potatoes...so if potato can't be ginger how can onion be ginger....so the second conclusion is correct!
Thank you very much sir .....I have been struggling with syllogism since a long time ....but now using income and exp trick my accuracy is almost 100 %
OK! Got to say this for sure. Today was my Infosys test and I knew syllogism would be there. I could say for sure you could attend EVERY SINGLE SYLLOGISM questions after watching this video. A bit confusion was for the questions which had sentences not starting with those words ALL, NOT, SOME AND SOME NOT. In that case I was unable to solve the questions instead I was assuming the words before the sentence. Anyways, thanks a ton ❤️
I think it syllogism are difficult but after u explaining all are clear Actually i covered all of your logical and aptitude lessons of carrier ride by using your courese i believe that i will be score in this logical test near about 80-90 % . So thank u sir ❤😊😊🙏🙏
This one is the first video i found differentiating between possibility questions and normal questions. Thanks for explaining the basics. It was really helpful.
One of the finest teacher I have seen, ur teaching skill and techniques are awesome i feel very confident. I am damn sure that I will definitely get full marks on this topic. Thank you so much sir🤝
I search for english explaination,since hindi is difficult for me to understand. And found this! your teachings are great😇, you make the topic easy to understand. And I really like your English explaination.
Sir, possibilities are very difficult to understanding.am trying to getting more and more problems relating to possibilities for understanding this venn diagram. But IE method is very useful from the first solution..thank u sir
I just gave a mock test of Syllogism and got most of them wrong. Being into alas, I wanted to get my topic clear and found this Technique. Now I can solve all the types of it. thanks a Lot sir!🙌🙌💯💯🔥
Thank you so much career ride team...for the 1st time my syllogism topic got cleared with your very detailed explanation..plz keep up d gud work..god bless..once again a lot lot lot of thanks👍👏
SIr you Solve my all Doute in Logical Reasoing, I really thankful to you Your Teaching method are best , keep it up for providing free content YOUR ARE GREAT🙌
Thank you a lot .....very very thanks.....many videos being watched but not getting clear concepts what I got here....very crystal clear...i m very grateful to you forever for this very beautiful teachings....may God precipitate right knowledge upon you...
Thanks a lot Sir for wonderful tips...Sir but in Q-14, another option DEC is also correct. Also please explain the logic behind some of the empirical rules given by you 🙏
Sir i understood the income -expense method but i am unable to understand the venn diagram method .will you please try some another way to make us understand the venn diagram method.
Who is this Master blaster behind the screen because I never watched someone explaining this clear with so much of patience. Thank you so much sir 😊. I hope we can see you one day
Thankyou so much sir for this wonderful video. The concepts and pattern you are telling us is very much relatable so we enjoyed logical section a lot and the topic is covered in only one video that's amazing for me . Once again thanks sir👍
How can we use the income expenditure method for this? Statements: 1] Some poens are rich 2] X is rich Conclusions: 1] X is a peon 2] X has large family
I have learn new thing that IE.. It is so much help to find easily., but it is not help to find answers when the conclusion is come either or neither option. So, kindly help me to relese the video regard this..
i-e method usually gives wrong conclusion.ex- statement-1-all grapes are green .2-some green are hard. conclusion-1-some green are grapes.2-some hard are grapes.3-no grapes are hard
I found a problem on a web site: 1) All tigers are Lions 2) Some Lions are Leopards with conclusions: 3) Some Tigers are Leopards and 4) No Tigers are Leopards. If we allocate the income/expenses scheme, 1) 100 Ti; 50 Li 2) 50 Li; 50 Le 3) 50 Ti; 50 Le 4) 100 Ti; 100 Le. To evaluate (3) we consider (1) and (2) together and try to eliminate Li, which both have 50, so, based on the algorithm you propose, this should result in (3) being false. However, if you think logically, (3) is true, and also the answer on that web page stated (3) was true. Your formula has some serious problems. It could work in some particular cases, but it doesn't seem to be generally valid. You should revise your algorithm, or place a disclaimer stating that it is not generally valid, so people wouldn't base their knowledge or interview results on something like that.
3 is false, even using venn diagrams. The website was the incorrect one. Some Tigers may be Leopards, but we can't guarantee that some Tigers are Leopards from the given statements. Doing by Venn Diagram, draw a circle for lions. Inside it, draw a circle for tigers. So all tigers are lions. 1) is satisfied. Now, draw a circle for leopards that intersects lions, but not tigers. So some lions are Leopards and 2) is satisfied. By this diagram, conclusion 3) of some tigers are Leopards is false. It's a *possibility* if you draw the venn diagrams a different way, but the conclusion doesn't say possibility.
Thanku so much sir, for making syllogism so easy.... I was searching such teacher that make study easy... I saw so much videos on another channels... But no one was perfect .... You are best teacher....
Your income-expense trick does not work in this question Statements: 1. No streak is a line. 2. Some lines are bands. 3. All bands are flashes. Conclusions: I. Some flashes are streaks. II. No flash is a line.
at 47:56 when you said ""If conclusion is True for all the possible venn diagrams then mark it as Wrong however if its true for some and false for others then mark is Correct" I got confused but then after little research I got my answer. So sharing answer with everyone if you faced same confusion. The advice you received regarding syllogism problems and Venn diagrams is meant to help you understand the concept of validity and invalidity when evaluating syllogistic conclusions using Venn diagrams. This approach is based on the idea that if a conclusion holds true in all possible Venn diagrams, it might be too strong and therefore incorrect. Conversely, if a conclusion is true in some diagrams but false in others, it's more likely to be accurate and valid. Here's why this approach makes sense: 1. **All Possible Venn Diagrams:** In syllogism problems, conclusions are drawn based on categorical statements (premises) involving sets or categories. Venn diagrams represent the relationships between these sets. If a conclusion is true in all possible Venn diagrams, it could indicate that the conclusion is overly broad or making assumptions that are too strong. In real-world scenarios, it's rare for a conclusion to be universally true for all cases. 2. **Some True and Some False:** When a conclusion is true in some Venn diagrams but false in others, it suggests that the conclusion is making a statement that holds true for certain cases but not for others. This aligns more closely with the nuanced nature of real-world logical reasoning. The goal of syllogistic reasoning is to determine what can be logically inferred from given premises, and this often involves identifying conclusions that are valid in specific scenarios. By adopting this approach, you are promoting a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the relationships between sets in syllogistic reasoning. It encourages you to consider the shades of meaning and the conditions under which a conclusion is true rather than assuming a conclusion is correct simply because it's universally applicable across all diagrams. Remember that syllogistic reasoning involves careful analysis of premises and conclusions, and applying techniques like Venn diagrams can be very helpful. This approach you've been advised to use can act as a valuable guideline to ensure that your conclusions are well-founded and appropriately nuanced.
Practice Questions on "Syllogism" available at: www.careerride.com/mcq/syllogism-logical-reasoning-mcq-questions-378.aspx
Sir can i ask u a question
sir, i have problem with (income expense) method when i solve this below method.
Statements: All the windows are doors. No door is a wall.
Conclusions:
Some windows are walls.
No wall is a door.
A. Only (1) conclusion follows
B. Only (2) conclusion follows
C. Either (1) or (2) follows
D. Neither (1) nor (2) follows
E. Both (1) and (2) follow
answer: when iam using ie method is (E).but when iam using vendiagram method is (B)
can any one explain this please??
Thank you so much for these tutorials...from bottom my heart .
@CareerRide No apple is an orange. All bananas are oranges.
(a) All apples are oranges
(b) Some apples are oranges
(c) No apple is a banana
(d) None of the above
Ans: according to income expenditure method BOTH A & C are correct
But ans of this question on every website OPTIONS A
How it possible
Plz sirrr explain me
@CareerRide plz reply me..sir
I discovered this channel last year during May for the MAT exams and did your classes and got 90 percentile within 15 days.
Now I am using it for placement preparation.
After each problem, " See how EASY it was" this really gives the confidence to solve such problems
Thank you very much sir !
You are most welcome
❤️❤️
absolutely bro ❤
@@CareerRideOfficial 😍
@iamsvk1710 i have same
problem bro, many of sums the IE method doesn't not works
Don't put the negative comments here.... it's kind of demotivation for other aspirants.... it's the great content that i ever seen... Thank you Sir😊
The finest teacher in RUclips when it comes to reasoning. Thank you so much sir.
the only thing I REGRET watching this is that I didn't discover your channel earlier.
Hope u are doing well
Same
Bukchik bukchik 💦
Exactly
Same here dear friend
Who's this teacher...sir great methods...and though you are explaining in English it's very easy to understand...
Ya i want to know
Who is behind this🧐🧐
I think it's manas sir ..he is now in talentballte
@@sameekshyamund3469 Right they are manas nighot sir now with Talent Battle
He is great
You are so great, especially today because where utube channels do extensive advertisement more than teaching, it is actually very difficult to find teachers who actually teach....Thankyou!!
I believe many upsc aspirants might not be aware of your channel. And it's worth to be known.
Thanks. :)
Can we request you to share it in your circle?
This is an appreciation message:-
today was my MPSET paper, bht dino se logical reasoning mene khud se try kia bht videoes dekhe mjhse ek question nhi bna but kl raat ye video dekhi methods sikhi nd aaj ye confirm he ki logical reasoning k saare quest.shi krk aai hu.....
Thank you so much sir sch me ek accha teacher student ki problems fraction of second me solve kr deta he.....thnku so so much for this lecture
All the best! :)
The best syllo teaching ive ever seen, for the first time in 2 years i understand how syllo works. thanks alot sir!!!
Sir you never promote ur channel only focus on teaching I love that
6 years old video and still the best one in this platform ❤
Yes I found first video
😂
Any other channels ?
our country needs teacher like you.....hats off
At first I thought, using income and expenditure method makes the problem complex...
But trust me...it really helps to reduce the complexities and can be solved in sec...
Thank you for making such a wonderful content🥰
Not yet , if I can solve any question hardly 20 sec from Venn or only thinking then it takes 30 sec to solve same problem.
@@shailidwivedi2045 hello can you please solve this question by income expenditure method
Statements:
All tricks are gimmicks. No mimic is a gimmick.
Conclusions:
L No trick is a gimmick.
II. Some gimmicks are not tricks.
@@sejalshinde533 Income:
1) tricks=100, gimmicks=50
2) mimic=100, gimmick=100
Expenditure:
1) Trick= 100, gimmick= 100
2) gimmick=50, tricks=100
1st conclusion is wrong as expenditure of gimmick is more than income
2nd statement is true as income=expenditure
@@sejalshinde533 but this question if far easier when done using venn diagrams
You are one of the greatest teachers, I wish you taught me all my subjects.
I wanna say, it was amazing & supremely great....I thought I didn't have any capacity to understand logical reasoning,,,,I lost hope when I used to study alone with the help of book but this teacher helped me to build my confidence up, thank you sir#
I always used to skip this topic while writing RBI/SBI mock examinations but now I can score 5/5 in this topic. Thank you for the crystal clear explanation. Hope this helps me in upcoming examinations.
How do you apply mock test? How much per test? Any suggestions? Btw, if you don't mind have you selected in any of the job you've mention? (Just curious)
@@Tholin-tm7ps In my opinion testbook is very good,,,,
STATEMENTS
All chilies are garlics.
Some garlics are onions.
All onions are potatoes.
No potato is ginger.
CONCLUSIONS
1; Some chilies are potatoes
2; No onion is ginger.
Sir as per your income expenditure method the answer i got was only conclusion 1 is correct but the correct answer is ,only conclusion 2 follows , if you could please clarify on this
@@abhaigopinath6338facing the same issue. Its all applicable to every (normal) problem also
@@abhaigopinath6338Some chillies won't be potato as the sentence is not definitely true... it's a possibility that some chillies can be potato...but here in conclusion possibility is not given... it's a direct sentence and so this conclusion is wrong!!
The second one...No Potato is Ginger which means No Ginger is Potato... Onion comes under Potato...All onions are Potatoes...so if potato can't be ginger how can onion be ginger....so the second conclusion is correct!
Thank you very much sir .....I have been struggling with syllogism since a long time ....but now using income and exp trick my accuracy is almost 100 %
Wah sir!! MAJA AA GAYA!! Aour saath saath samaj bhi aa gaya. Aap ek pehle teacher ho jiska samjhaya hua syllogism mujhe samaj me aa gaya... 🥴🥴
🎉🎉
One of the best careerride videos! I don't think anyone else knows the Income expense method.
OK! Got to say this for sure. Today was my Infosys test and I knew syllogism would be there. I could say for sure you could attend EVERY SINGLE SYLLOGISM questions after watching this video. A bit confusion was for the questions which had sentences not starting with those words ALL, NOT, SOME AND SOME NOT. In that case I was unable to solve the questions instead I was assuming the words before the sentence. Anyways, thanks a ton ❤️
what was the difficulty level of Infosys test
A few
Few
Many
Atleast..?
Could you explain more about the 48:00 more
How the conclusion is wrong when both the possibilies are correct/wrong?
Exactly u right bro... In that question 2nd last conclusion is the answer... But hw they are telling 1st three conclusions are true
Can you both tell me what the correct answer is? Are they teaching in the wrong way?
In question no. 4 conclusion 3 should hold true as some c can be b or some c can not be b.
yeah, I thought the same but once check at 39:39 then you will understand.
Why didn't i find your channel earlier? I find syllogism quiet difficult but now I'm confident. Thank you for the clear explanation
you are great, and your accent is to die for. Love from Armenia.
I think it syllogism are difficult but after u explaining all are clear
Actually i covered all of your logical and aptitude lessons of carrier ride by using your courese i believe that i will be score in this logical test near about 80-90 % . So thank u sir ❤😊😊🙏🙏
This one is the first video i found differentiating between possibility questions and normal questions.
Thanks for explaining the basics. It was really helpful.
Some questions are wrong 😢
The final word "see how easy it is"unforgottable😅😅
Your explaining style is amazing!
No words for this..
Thanks sir. This is too much easy method..
Excellent way of teaching...wonderful....I have upcoming placement examinations and this video was really a blessing from you sir
One of the finest teacher I have seen, ur teaching skill and techniques are awesome i feel very confident. I am damn sure that I will definitely get full marks on this topic. Thank you so much sir🤝
"We dont want these smaller value people" hilarious. You're awesome
Seriously best word😂
😂
It got me so hard
Amazing... This income-expense method is superb 😮😮
I search for english explaination,since hindi is difficult for me to understand. And found this! your teachings are great😇, you make the topic easy to understand. And I really like your English explaination.
Sir, possibilities are very difficult to understanding.am trying to getting more and more problems relating to possibilities for understanding this venn diagram. But IE method is very useful from the first solution..thank u sir
I just gave a mock test of Syllogism and got most of them wrong. Being into alas, I wanted to get my topic clear and found this Technique. Now I can solve all the types of it. thanks a Lot sir!🙌🙌💯💯🔥
ven diagram is perfect method to solve syllogism.
sir during 24:30 in this question hoe can you distribute the middle term (here boys) in the conclusion. isnt that a violation of the rules.
It felt difficult at first and i got scared but after watching the whole video, I'm confident about solving them
Thankyou so much!
This channel won my heart and mind. ♥🙏
Thank you so much career ride team...for the 1st time my syllogism topic got cleared with your very detailed explanation..plz keep up d gud work..god bless..once again a lot lot lot of thanks👍👏
Yes u are right conclusion 1 in question no. 5 is not valid it is worng
Thank you sir for granting marks for our competitive exams
Bohot badiya sir... Ek number trick hai. Loved it🙏
Which was impossible till now is now possible. Tq so much sir.
Amazing!! Please make a video on data interpretation, data sufficiency,cubes and logical connectives. Much needed!!
Some time u said true for some and sometimes false... It creates a confession
I would say the way of your explaination are greta & fabulous.
Thank you so much for the lovely & knowledgable video.
God bless you!
SIr you Solve my all Doute in Logical Reasoing, I really thankful to you
Your Teaching method are best , keep it up for providing free content
YOUR ARE GREAT🙌
The one who has more than enough talent thank you sir
First time getting excellent explanation of syllogisms
I understand in my ist attempt God bless U
Thank you so much sir
I don't remember how many channels I have checked before this lecture .... your lectures are so lucidly explained
Here explanations are incomplete and incorrect just a warning. you can try these methods you will get wrong answers
@@Divine-vx3qdDude after watching this video..I got all my answers correct
I think u need to focus on the video more ...
Very helpful ,
Watching last night before exam 😁
Thank you a lot .....very very thanks.....many videos being watched but not getting clear concepts what I got here....very crystal clear...i m very grateful to you forever for this very beautiful teachings....may God precipitate right knowledge upon you...
such a brilliant and easy explanation that even a normal student can understand... thankq a lot sir...
"See how easy it is ! " Sir 🙏💖
bro who is the teacher here? He knows every way to make student understand and remember certain things by heart.
Best video on Syllogism on RUclips 😀
Lol
😻thanks to the whole community of Careerride 😻when ever I opened utube to study I only search carreeride & that topic. 😄😍😍😍😍
Thanks a lot Sir for wonderful tips...Sir but in Q-14, another option DEC is also correct.
Also please explain the logic behind some of the empirical rules given by you 🙏
Yeah
sir you haven't solved the "some not" type of situation.....please provide a some not type of examples.
Yes
Way of teaching is good sir
kavya reddy .. it's a fake method .. watch 43rd minute question he has solved ... Question number 4.. trust urself rather than these fake teaching ..
@@kanhayalalagarwal5913 Watch at 39:00
Whenever i have doubts i always coming for this channel.🙌🏼
Your the best teacher for aptitude and reasoning.. got selected in tcs company because of your classes only thankyou sir
Great news. Congrats!
Way of teaching ❤️ really easy method, thanks alot🤝
Thank you Bro. Its the best i 've ever seen..
Sir i understood the income -expense method but i am unable to understand the venn diagram method .will you please try some another way to make us understand the venn diagram method.
Income & expenditure method is a way misleading so Venn diagram is 100% reliable
Me tooo
Me too sir
me too😢
Me tooo sir
Who is this Master blaster behind the screen because I never watched someone explaining this clear with so much of patience. Thank you so much sir 😊. I hope we can see you one day
The voice matches with a voice of Angry prash
The best video for reasoning 👍👍
Inspite of being a long long video...it's genuinely worth seeing and grasping the important information...
Absolutely amazing 👏😍
Awesome Teacher. You are making it look so easy! Well done!
Really ur great sir.. Ur teaching gives me a huge confidence.. What a teacher ur.. I didnt ever saw such a teacher like this..
Thank you sir... Grateful to u ...💛❤️💛❤️...ಧನ್ಯವಾದಗಳು...💛❤️💛❤️
Thankyou so much sir for this wonderful video. The concepts and pattern you are telling us is very much relatable so we enjoyed logical section a lot and the topic is covered in only one video that's amazing for me .
Once again thanks sir👍
The income/expenditure method is not 100% accurate. if we are using this trick it's 50% gamble
can u pls explain how or give some examples(idk much about syllogisms but i have a small exam so i was checking the video)
@@udaykalyansreenivasa2311 Use Venn diagram to solve syllogisms question it's fast and accurate.
Also seen very difficult try to use venn diagram instead of this its very easy
Yes its 50 50 by chance
Venn diagram is best method
Beautifully explained.. welldone sir..👍
Great Explanation dear sir
Thanks a lot ❤🙏🙏🙏
Extremely Helpful Playlist !!
How can we use the income expenditure method for this?
Statements:
1] Some poens are rich
2] X is rich
Conclusions:
1] X is a peon
2] X has large family
If you got answer for this plzz tell that thing in
command....
Sir your comedy is awesome
both conclusion are wrong
Your Vids are awesome, Plz do Vids on data interpretation
I have learn new thing that IE.. It is so much help to find easily., but it is not help to find answers when the conclusion is come either or neither option. So, kindly help me to relese the video regard this..
Read my comment above.
This teacher comes with extraordinary intelligence
amazing style of teaching.... thanku sir ❤
i-e method usually gives wrong conclusion.ex-
statement-1-all grapes are green .2-some green are hard.
conclusion-1-some green are grapes.2-some hard are grapes.3-no grapes are hard
1& 2 follow, do you know correct answer?
In the last question option C is also holding correct along with B ....
Yes you should also explain other options also
1:09:53 that" how the hell" was really funny. Great explanation by the way😉
I feel stress free. Thank you sir for teaching us these wonderful techniques
OMG..Was this stupid topic was so easy...Syllogisms was always a villain in my competitive exam world...Amazing Teacher...Hats Off
syllogisms feel like a cakewalk now. thanks :)
I found a problem on a web site: 1) All tigers are Lions 2) Some Lions are Leopards with conclusions: 3) Some Tigers are Leopards and 4) No Tigers are Leopards. If we allocate the income/expenses scheme, 1) 100 Ti; 50 Li 2) 50 Li; 50 Le 3) 50 Ti; 50 Le 4) 100 Ti; 100 Le. To evaluate (3) we consider (1) and (2) together and try to eliminate Li, which both have 50, so, based on the algorithm you propose, this should result in (3) being false. However, if you think logically, (3) is true, and also the answer on that web page stated (3) was true. Your formula has some serious problems. It could work in some particular cases, but it doesn't seem to be generally valid. You should revise your algorithm, or place a disclaimer stating that it is not generally valid, so people wouldn't base their knowledge or interview results on something like that.
3 is false, even using venn diagrams. The website was the incorrect one.
Some Tigers may be Leopards, but we can't guarantee that some Tigers are Leopards from the given statements.
Doing by Venn Diagram, draw a circle for lions. Inside it, draw a circle for tigers. So all tigers are lions. 1) is satisfied.
Now, draw a circle for leopards that intersects lions, but not tigers. So some lions are Leopards and 2) is satisfied.
By this diagram, conclusion 3) of some tigers are Leopards is false. It's a *possibility* if you draw the venn diagrams a different way, but the conclusion doesn't say possibility.
Statements:
Some squares are circles.
No circle is a triangle.
No line is a square.
Conclusions:
I. Some triangles are not squares.
II. Some lines are circles.
Sir please explain this question by income expense method
Thanku so much sir, for making syllogism so easy.... I was searching such teacher that make study easy... I saw so much videos on another channels... But no one was perfect .... You are best teacher....
Best video ever made made on syllogisms
Your income-expense trick does not work in this question
Statements:
1. No streak is a line.
2. Some lines are bands.
3. All bands are flashes.
Conclusions:
I. Some flashes are streaks.
II. No flash is a line.
Hi Sir, in normal sum the common words when it is 50-50 we should consider the conclusion/Expenditure as wrong or we should still proceed
Sir this video is very helpful in understanding the syllogism specially the income expenditure method.
Thanku u sirji👍👍✌️👌🙏🙏😀
at 47:56 when you said ""If conclusion is True for all the possible venn diagrams then mark it as Wrong however if its true for some and false for others then mark is Correct" I got confused but then after little research I got my answer.
So sharing answer with everyone if you faced same confusion.
The advice you received regarding syllogism problems and Venn diagrams is meant to help you understand the concept of validity and invalidity when evaluating syllogistic conclusions using Venn diagrams. This approach is based on the idea that if a conclusion holds true in all possible Venn diagrams, it might be too strong and therefore incorrect. Conversely, if a conclusion is true in some diagrams but false in others, it's more likely to be accurate and valid.
Here's why this approach makes sense:
1. **All Possible Venn Diagrams:** In syllogism problems, conclusions are drawn based on categorical statements (premises) involving sets or categories. Venn diagrams represent the relationships between these sets. If a conclusion is true in all possible Venn diagrams, it could indicate that the conclusion is overly broad or making assumptions that are too strong. In real-world scenarios, it's rare for a conclusion to be universally true for all cases.
2. **Some True and Some False:** When a conclusion is true in some Venn diagrams but false in others, it suggests that the conclusion is making a statement that holds true for certain cases but not for others. This aligns more closely with the nuanced nature of real-world logical reasoning. The goal of syllogistic reasoning is to determine what can be logically inferred from given premises, and this often involves identifying conclusions that are valid in specific scenarios.
By adopting this approach, you are promoting a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the relationships between sets in syllogistic reasoning. It encourages you to consider the shades of meaning and the conditions under which a conclusion is true rather than assuming a conclusion is correct simply because it's universally applicable across all diagrams.
Remember that syllogistic reasoning involves careful analysis of premises and conclusions, and applying techniques like Venn diagrams can be very helpful. This approach you've been advised to use can act as a valuable guideline to ensure that your conclusions are well-founded and appropriately nuanced.
I think this was over exaggeration however the correct answer is at 1:02:51
Thanks a lot sir for your valuable teaching 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️