Sir aapke vajah se najane humare jaise kitne log jo coaching afford nhi karsakte voh sikh paa rahe hai. Aapke aise hi ashirvad banaye rakho. Bhagwaan aapko sab de jo aap chahe
Wow sir. Just one hour ago I wasn't able to solve a single question in my question bank correctly, and after watching this video, every single answer of mine is coming out correctly. Your explanation was amazing. Thank you so much.
Hi There, Question number 9 you have marked the answer as A but the answer is B right. Your videos are very detailed. I am writing one of my tests. It is very useful.
in Q9, assumption 2 from the statement phrase "to regain the market share", we can definitely assume that there is competition/ competitor But how can we assume that there are many competitors? it can be one or two as well? (duopoly) so my doubt is, how is it implicit to say that there are many competitors ? especially many
Since their attempt is to REGAIN market share, there must be competition (which is implied or logical)... few and only are not explicitly said the statement and isn't logical either.
In question 9,assumption 1 is implicit because in statement they are given that "to regain the market share".which means they are in loss so that they need to " regain" the market share.
their share of loss in market doesn't necessarily mean that they're facing heavy losses. Also, the sale in the region might be up that year due to new competition which means the shares might vary
Hi sir gd mrng. Ur examples/ur tips and ur explanation is excellent excellent please continue the class and we will expect more questions from you about logical/general awareness/commonsense related questions.have a nice day.
Thanks, Poonam. We have got some interesting videos on QA, Resume Writing, HR Interview and Interview Q & A on core subjects as well. Do take a look :)
Question 9 : It may not be true that "there are many competitors in the market" (there may be only one or few) I think answer should be - Neither 1 or 2 is explicit
11:04 Now Everyone in Dilemma Why not 1 and 2 explicit there They are in future And Future is always Explicit Yes you are correct 💯 Future always Explicit but Statement should be in present If Statement and Assumptions both are in future (then it is considered as present not Future). Thanks me After Getting +point in this ❤
In question no 9 - Can it be possible that apart from the company we are referring to in the question there is only one other company in the competition and it has lost it market share to that particular company.In that case assumption of " Many competitors " might not be implicit .Just a thought ,feedbacks are welcome .
No. Losing market share does not imply that the company X is in heavy loses. It might also have lost only some amount of market share. So to regain that market share it has decided to introduce new products in the market, to gain back the lost share not to cover loses, why would a company launch a new product while it is incurring heavy losses ?
Thank you so much sir❤️🙏 it helped me a lot !! Love from Kerala❤️ I have watched some videos in another channels but they're not explaining too much but you sir explaining each and every steps ❤ thankyou..
In Q)9 why not assumption 1 is implicit ?? Because it's written in the statement that " to regain the market share" that means company wants to re - gain thats means currently company is running at loss... please clarify.
You're welcome, Sonali. We have got some interesting videos on QA, Resume Writing, HR Interview and Interview Q & A on core topics as well. Do take a look. :)
q6: cant we consider 'the interview' as a specific instance and an interview as a generalisation. meaning even option 1 is wrong similarly 'many' competitors also becomes an ambiguous assumption in q9
You're right. The question mentions a specific interview by using "the". However, option A mentions "an" interview, which makes it a generalization. Similarly, in question 9, "many" competitors is an incorrect assumption. There might just be 2 large companies that are fighting for market share amongst each other. It is wrong to assume that there are "many" competitors. I thought I was the only one who spotted this.
In question 9 , assumption 2 states there are "many" other competitors in the market. Agreed that since in the statement it is mentioned that company X has lost its market share thus it implies there are competitor/s in the market. But what if there is just one competitor and company X lost all its market share to just that one competitor. I am doubtful about the word " many". If the assumption 2 stated there are other competitors in the market then it probably would have been more appropriate
And even if there were it doesn't matter cause many can refer to even one competitor or more cause in the question it's talking about the loss if market share and how to regain it. Loosing to one competitor or more than one also is still a loss to the company which is suffering
Yes, Even I got the same doubt. Market means there is no necessary to have so many competitors even if there are 2 or 3 companies also it's called a market. So the option 2 is implicit only if there is MAY instead of MANY
In Question 8 we have possibility of future and in begining you mentioned that anything about future and past should be explicit so why are not both assumption explicit ?
sir last one answer is 2 option, i guess u had ticked mistakenly a wrong answer. and sir thank u for such awesome video. this video had almost cleared my 90% of this topic.
I know this is a late reply, but the answer will be C. We do not know if he will study hard or not, but we know that he will either study hard or he will not study hard. Yes, both are explicit, but one of them will be true. If a coin is flipped and we assume it will be heads, we are wrong. If we say it will be tails, we are wrong again. But if we say it will be either heads or tails, we are right.
Q.6 : To crack the interview (Specific) is a specific statement, while in the Assumption it states to crack an interview (General). Hence, it should be invalid for both.
Future or past: explicit
General in case of specific , specific in case of general : explicit
Going against the statement : explicit
Thx
Use of every ,each,none ,all,only ,etc.--explict
@11:44 the ASSUMPTION made was in future tense
Thanks akka😊
These logical topics are beyond imagination when I think im going in right direction it turns wrong😕😕😕😂😂😂😂these are not difficult but confusing
Yes,same thing happened 😁
same with mee too😢😅😊
same 😅 I thought I get it, but turns out wrong
then just go in the wrong direction 😅
That's why we are learning logical reasoning😉😂🤣
Sir aapke vajah se najane humare jaise kitne log jo coaching afford nhi karsakte voh sikh paa rahe hai. Aapke aise hi ashirvad banaye rakho. Bhagwaan aapko sab de jo aap chahe
15:54, "where the hell is mentioned that", sir aap toh jazbaati ho gye.
😂😂
haaaha
lol
In the last question it should be only assumption 2 is implicit, right?
@@nisthasingh8994 YES
You helped me complete a whole chapter.... thank you soo much🥺
Wow sir. Just one hour ago I wasn't able to solve a single question in my question bank correctly, and after watching this video, every single answer of mine is coming out correctly. Your explanation was amazing. Thank you so much.
the way you teaching is so nice that the topic become easy to understand a bunch of thanks to you sir
Hi There, Question number 9 you have marked the answer as A but the answer is B right. Your videos are very detailed. I am writing one of my tests. It is very useful.
Bro where are u know, wt u doin!?
U r right (b) is right....
You are right bro👌
Ye comment badhwane ki ninja technique h bro aap nhi samjh rhe 😂
The answer is D
in Q9, assumption 2
from the statement phrase "to regain the market share", we can definitely assume that there is competition/ competitor
But how can we assume that there are many competitors? it can be one or two as well? (duopoly)
so my doubt is, how is it implicit to say that there are many competitors ? especially many
I mean, just the word "many" would not make the statement explicit.
Your Raised Point it correct.
Even they write on bord ans 2 Implicite and tick 1 is implicite ..may be he is in hurry to close the sassion.
He himself became explicit within time...😂😂😂@@vijaymishra7078
@17:00 In question 9, there can also be a case where there's just one (or only few) competitor/s.
Since their attempt is to REGAIN market share, there must be competition (which is implied or logical)... few and only are not explicitly said the statement and isn't logical either.
@@A7X33ycsm exactly
@@sushmitachakraborty5477 yes sushmita
Sir question no. 9 answer should be only b
I think it was a silly mistake on his part to choose option A instead of B
right.
Right i guess that is by mistake
Right. By mistake he took option A
Yes, there is some mistake on his part because he has mentioned on both the assumption that which one is implicit and which is explicit.
Extremely helpful in grasping basic concepts. thanks
Best teaching that's my personal review really he is teaching good
In question 9,assumption 1 is implicit because in statement they are given that "to regain the market share".which means they are in loss so that they need to " regain" the market share.
their share of loss in market doesn't necessarily mean that they're facing heavy losses. Also, the sale in the region might be up that year due to new competition which means the shares might vary
I'm studying this for SSC CGL MAINS, thanks to this channel 🤝
so we can study for ssc from this??? its quite easy sooo
@@emanbushra7870 did you clear cgl?
Your videos are gem....after 4 years also they are helping us
Mathematics and Reasoning concepts will never change, Arpan ! :)
Glad you are finding them helpful.
Extremely helpful sir... Thanks for such a effective content. U hv covered almost all the reasoning topics in different videos. 👍😊
Hi sir gd mrng.
Ur examples/ur tips and ur explanation is excellent excellent please continue the class and we will expect more questions from you about logical/general awareness/commonsense related questions.have a nice day.
Awesome sir.... hereafter I ll attend these type of questions in exams😊..thank u sir
Skill of explanation is excellent.
Thanks, Poonam. We have got some interesting videos on QA, Resume Writing, HR Interview and Interview Q & A on core subjects as well. Do take a look :)
It was .. awesome explanation..thank u for the video
Wid ur help m able 2 clear my all doubts very easily
Thnk u Soo much 🙏🏻
Very effective session Thankyou so much sirr❤
Your teaching is amazing! It was really helpful .... THANKYOU SO MUCH
It was really helpful sir thanks a lot sir......❤️❤️
one of the best video to learn from the basic.
What an absolute trick in English !
Legends definitely meet legends via different ways.
Literally thz video is Cleary nd easily to understand ☺️
Really great for those who are stated freshly
Thank you sir.... first time I'm learning this concept....in the first time only I understand...sir
Thank you so much sir 😌😌 very very helpful video ☺️☺️☺️
+ 1 Q : 4:20 : Important Question
+ 2 Q : 5:26 :
+ 3Q : 6:09 :
+ 4Q : 7:49 : Important Question
+ 5Q : 10:25 :
+ 6Q : 12:33 :
+ 7Q : 13:05
+ 8Q : 14:38 :
+ 9Q : 15:40 :
+ 10 Q :
How do you even add video timelines to comment ?
It is really helpful to me . nice explanation.
thank you sir 🙏🏼
To have a teacher like you in life is such a great blessing from Almighty Allah ♥️♥️♥️♥️may Allah bless you today tommorow and always
Assumptions
1)every neither all
2) against statement
3)future or past
4)specific general
15:52 i laughed soo hard when he went like 'where the hell is it mentioned' 😂😂😂
😂😂 same
Question 9 : It may not be true that "there are many competitors in the market" (there may be only one or few)
I think answer should be - Neither 1 or 2 is explicit
Yes ... mujhe bhi same lga ..ki use loss hua than regain karne k liye New products launch kiya
You are best teacher of India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 thanks sir
Thanks, Sweta, We try to do our best for our viewers and your comments definitely motivate us to do better. Stay connected :)
11:04
Now Everyone in Dilemma
Why not 1 and 2 explicit there
They are in future
And Future is always Explicit Yes you are correct 💯 Future always Explicit but Statement should be in present
If Statement and Assumptions both are in future (then it is considered as present not Future).
Thanks me After Getting +point in this ❤
Very Good Explanation Sir. Thank you
Thanku sir ❤, very helpful for understanding in easy way
Loved ur explanation sir🙏🙏🙏..
Thank You sir, one correction that the last Q. answer is "only assumption II is Implicit".
Sir, you have great English speaking skills..nice and supporting video
In question no 9 - Can it be possible that apart from the company we are referring to in the question there is only one other company in the competition and it has lost it market share to that particular company.In that case assumption of " Many competitors " might not be implicit .Just a thought ,feedbacks are welcome .
True dat
Depends on what question setter has thought of 🤣🤣
Exactly what I was thinking about...
Helpful video.. Thank you sir 🙏
Tq sir it is very useful for solving and helpful for placements
Thank you sir, I watched other videos on this subject but they were confusing. Your video was the first one where I could understand :)
In question 9
If X has to regain that means it has gone through losses. Isn't it? So it should be both implicit ??
No. Losing market share does not imply that the company X is in heavy loses. It might also have lost only some amount of market share. So to regain that market share it has decided to introduce new products in the market, to gain back the lost share not to cover loses, why would a company launch a new product while it is incurring heavy losses ?
It lost the market "share", Implying that other companies took the market share, heavy losses relate to loss in sales etc,not market share.
Same doubt to me also
In assumption 2...'many' will make statement wrong.. Won't it??
There are competitors.. Agreed
But number.. Not known
@@Ricky-es4cx thanks bud
Awesome lecture sir thank.. and it is implicit..😁
Thank you so much sir❤️🙏 it helped me a lot !! Love from Kerala❤️ I have watched some videos in another channels but they're not explaining too much but you sir explaining each and every steps ❤ thankyou..
Thank you! This is very helpful.
16:46 by what logic u said statement 2 is implicit, using the same logic we can also say statement 1 is implicit
Thank you sir,, it is very useful to us..🙂👍👍👍
it is really worth to watch and listen it, such a fantastic!!!!!!! lecture , great keep going , we will support you.
Uncle kuch jobs hamare liye chod do
@@samraatg1 😂
In q 9 ..if company have loss market share then it means it is going through loss bcz of competitors...I think both 1 and 2 should be implicit.
Where it is written that company have loss
Thank u so much sir you helped me the most 💐
Very very nice class sir..........thnks a lot
Hearty grateful to you.. such a nice effort and just fall in love with your voice..
voice se bhi pyarv hojave use to chhod do
Nice explanation. Very to the point.. No time wasting. Thank you
Good morning sir
It's very helpful...
Thank you 😊🙏
Yesss very short a impressive way to feed our brain thanks sir
Most welcome, Sarabjot. Do take advantage of all the videos :)
Thank you so much, sir✌.This video has helped me to solve the questions very quickly
Love u ...sir ...thanks .u r great .. keep it up...you will soon gain the ground
Thanks, Ayaan Do share the video with your friends and family & join us in our mission to make good content available to all. Stay connected :)
In Q)9 why not assumption 1 is implicit ?? Because it's written in the statement that " to regain the market share" that means company wants to re - gain thats means currently company is running at loss... please clarify.
Exactly.....I was thinking the same
Thank a lot sir it’s helped me so much
Because of you I cracked wipro and tcs ninja both
That's a great news, Shahid. Congratulations and All the best!
I am getting confused about which question is an assumption, which is an argument, and which is the conclusion.
very helpful for law entrance exam thank u sir
You're welcome, Sonali. We have got some interesting videos on QA, Resume Writing, HR Interview and Interview Q & A on core topics as well. Do take a look. :)
very thankful your all episode are quite informative please upload practise question link in statement & argument
Thanks, Priyank.
See this please: www.careerride.com/pcategory/logical-reasoning-for-job-interviews-and-exams-25.aspx
q6: cant we consider 'the interview' as a specific instance and an interview as a generalisation. meaning even option 1 is wrong
similarly 'many' competitors also becomes an ambiguous assumption in q9
You're right. The question mentions a specific interview by using "the". However, option A mentions "an" interview, which makes it a generalization. Similarly, in question 9, "many" competitors is an incorrect assumption. There might just be 2 large companies that are fighting for market share amongst each other. It is wrong to assume that there are "many" competitors. I thought I was the only one who spotted this.
your videos are awesum....i don't find better than yours,..thank you so muchhh
Pleased to hear that! Thanks!
SEARCH MORE !!
Very helpful video to understand
Thank u so much sir🌈
In question 9 , assumption 2 states there are "many" other competitors in the market. Agreed that since in the statement it is mentioned that company X has lost its market share thus it implies there are competitor/s in the market. But what if there is just one competitor and company X lost all its market share to just that one competitor. I am doubtful about the word " many". If the assumption 2 stated there are other competitors in the market then it probably would have been more appropriate
Can you call it a market with just two companies in it??
And even if there were it doesn't matter cause many can refer to even one competitor or more cause in the question it's talking about the loss if market share and how to regain it. Loosing to one competitor or more than one also is still a loss to the company which is suffering
Yes, Even I got the same doubt. Market means there is no necessary to have so many competitors even if there are 2 or 3 companies also it's called a market. So the option 2 is implicit only if there is MAY instead of MANY
@@suvedhyareddy7771 This also implies that Option 1 should also follow because it says company is at a loss,
Thankyou! This video was of immense help.
I have learned logical thinking thanks a lot😊
Thanks a lot sir
Lots of respect
In Question 8 we have possibility of future and in begining you mentioned that anything about future and past should be explicit so why are not both assumption explicit ?
The statement is also from future, not just the assumption
awesome video sir...the way u explained and ur tips really set u apart from the crowd ...pls keep making such videos sir
Thanks, Vinit. We're pleased to know that you find our videos helpful. All the best!
AWESOME SIR EVERYTHING CLEARED THANK YOU SIR
Thank you so much! This is a great help!
Not necessarily many competitors..
Company could have lost the share to just one competitor .right ?
Question No. 9
exactly
Really i have no words to this video ,
Masterpiece❤
Guys... All his explanation is correct but the only last question he mistakenly tick the option A instead of B
thank u so much sir🙏🙏🙏
Simply best explaination....
Thank you so much sir ❤️
Thanks for existing admin!
sir last one answer is 2 option, i guess u had ticked mistakenly a wrong answer.
and sir thank u for such awesome video. this video had almost cleared my 90% of this topic.
Yes it should be tick on (2)
in q 8 both the assumptions are related to future and you said tht future assumptions are explicit thn how c is the right ans
You explain so nicely. Thanks
You're welcome, Taniza!
Sir in question number 8 hw ans is C we dont no about Ram whether he will study hard or not so Ans shpoud be D. statement is in general
I know this is a late reply, but the answer will be C. We do not know if he will study hard or not, but we know that he will either study hard or he will not study hard. Yes, both are explicit, but one of them will be true.
If a coin is flipped and we assume it will be heads, we are wrong. If we say it will be tails, we are wrong again. But if we say it will be either heads or tails, we are right.
Q.6 : To crack the interview (Specific) is a specific statement, while in the Assumption it states to crack an interview (General). Hence, it should be invalid for both.
You are Wrong.....
Yeah, I think so, you are correct
Thank u for the video... I loved it... But there is a mistake in last question... Pls solve it for others
awesome one sir expcet one or two being explained wrong....thanks a lot for all your efforts sir
Thanks for video 👍
In question 9 option E is correct 👍👍
Thank you. It was very helpful