My personal definition of art is when I cannot walk past a painting because something in it compels me to look at it long enough to figure out what it has that keeps me staring at it, that is art to me. I want to feel something from it. All that I have seen thus far, are pieces that evoke a sensation of numbness. They may as well be hanging on the wall of a subway tunnel. If its a textural piece I want the piece to make me want to touch it when I can’t. If its a landscape piece I want the piece to draw me into that landscape. I want to breathe the air in it and walk the ground of it. If its a still life I want the piece to make me look at objects like I never did before. If a piece depicts a social scene I want the piece to place me in that scene. There is nothing worse than an art piece that merely occupies space, such as that monstrosity that occupies the space in Secaucus Junction NJ, presumed to be an indigenous plant to what used to be a marsh reclamation area.
absolute honest answer there, I myself prefer the art at The Metropolitan Museum of Art.. i will say at MOMA there are some pieces i have seen that are incredible like Wyeth's Christina's world... though since it is modern art It is very much depending on your tastes... I enjoy murakami and people might see him as simply making transactional art... so who knows, i think it's very important though what your saying there are some art I simply cannot understand.. but it has moved someone somewhere and they have the money to keep it going... thanks
thanks for the thoughtful reply and I will endeavor to see the Wyeth exhibit in a time soon...the money to keep it going...is not making art...it makes money...money is the thing between two comparable things of necessity...so it makes itself in larger quantities@@theyorker; therefore, art is deprived by money and quality is sacrificed for quantity.
you can find my MomA part 2 searching in my videos, it's on the 5th floor... i gotta say i can't find it watching the video, it might've been hidden by crowds of people
i guess it's subjective. I do like some of the more traditional painted pieces of art(in the second part of this video), but myself don't understand the blank canvases... thanks for watching
![NEW YORK CITY Walking Tour [4K] - 5ht AVENUE - Sunset Walk](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FabiIE-IaSE/mqdefault.jpg)
THANK YOU
thanks for watching the video
My personal definition of art is when I cannot walk past a painting because something in it compels me to look at it long enough to figure out what it has that keeps me staring at it, that is art to me. I want to feel something from it. All that I have seen thus far, are pieces that evoke a sensation of numbness. They may as well be hanging on the wall of a subway tunnel. If its a textural piece I want the piece to make me want to touch it when I can’t. If its a landscape piece I want the piece to draw me into that landscape. I want to breathe the air in it and walk the ground of it. If its a still life I want the piece to make me look at objects like I never did before. If a piece depicts a social scene I want the piece to place me in that scene. There is nothing worse than an art piece that merely occupies space, such as that monstrosity that occupies the space in Secaucus Junction NJ, presumed to be an indigenous plant to what used to be a marsh reclamation area.
absolute honest answer there, I myself prefer the art at The Metropolitan Museum of Art.. i will say at MOMA there are some pieces i have seen that are incredible like Wyeth's Christina's world... though since it is modern art It is very much depending on your tastes... I enjoy murakami and people might see him as simply making transactional art... so who knows, i think it's very important though what your saying there are some art I simply cannot understand.. but it has moved someone somewhere and they have the money to keep it going... thanks
thanks for the thoughtful reply and I will endeavor to see the Wyeth exhibit in a time soon...the money to keep it going...is not making art...it makes money...money is the thing between two comparable things of necessity...so it makes itself in larger quantities@@theyorker; therefore, art is deprived by money and quality is sacrificed for quantity.
where is the Starry night of Van Gogh?
you can find my MomA part 2 searching in my videos, it's on the 5th floor... i gotta say i can't find it watching the video, it might've been hidden by crowds of people
thank you very much@@theyorker
Looks crap. Basically white walls with little bits of random stuff everywhere doesn’t even look artistic. Will cross this one off the list!
i guess it's subjective. I do like some of the more traditional painted pieces of art(in the second part of this video), but myself don't understand the blank canvases... thanks for watching