Noah Monnig you never lived under communism neither have i but based on my parents talkings they had a better life at communist yugoslavia. The system doesn’t matter as long as the leaders are honest and not criminals as todays so called politicians
GameAddict51 Literacy rate in India is 74%. The poor living in rural India and Muslims are contributing to the increasing population. Birthrate in Bombay n Delhi are 1.62 avg which is less than London, where it is 1.72.
Asia, the middle east, europe: holy shit what the fuck is that thing. Why are people turning black and decomposing while still alive.. must be gods wrath for human sins, witches and demons that unleashed this pestilence upon us.
ToddE GameZ That's the point. To show us that more humans meant more dangerous which makes you feel discomfort. You can see it corresponds with the dots. The more the faster
Donut Well that is an unproven assumption that likely is false. More humans should not mean more dangerous. Scare-tactic anti-life propaganda. Also, had the map been calibrated correctly to tell the truth, it would show that the world is still mostly empty of people. It is a type of graph, technically-speaking, and even a basic line graph, no matter how low the numbers, will nearly reach the top of the space or the paper, because graphs are usually calibrated to show the most information reasonably possible. A line graph of world population size over time, calibrated with the top of the graph, being the world filled up to "no elbow room" levels, would show a boring flat line that does nothing, all the way across. Even the early cities of Adam and Eve's time, a world population of just a few 1000s of people, might look something like a "modern day population explosion", by the normal means of calibrating graphs. But to read it in that manner, would be extremely misleading, as the world was mostly empty of people. In a world that could hold trillions of people if ever it had to, 7.4 billion people is less than 1% of capacity, and so the graph might only have a tiny few specks of white on it. Even on overexposed photos of the globe at night, the world is mostly dark. Areas of white lit up by cities, are not very much. Even a "solid white" world, would not be anywhere close to being full of people.
+ToddE GameZ listen mang, this fool believe the earth is 6000> years old! believes global warming doesnt exist, believe religion will solve every problem, believes overpopulation is a complete myth, and hes a trump supporter possibly from the south
No wonder India & China had seen golden times when whole remaining world was in dark age. These lands naturally supports human life. They were the first to be civilized. May be that is also a reason why India(Hindu) and China(Buddhists) never attacked on other people and looted them; b'coz they already were the reachest.
Darshil Kapadia golden age also only monk is Buddhists.tang dynasty State religion is Taoism.and tang neighboor is persia,so is not never attacked other people.
+M. Cloak The great leap forward and the cultural revolution was the most recent massive population decreases in china, and there has been other massacres and wars there throughout history
You should have told that to European settlers...they breeded so much that they colonised USA,New Zealand,Canada,South America,Australia.....man....just stop plz
+Andy Wilderness I was talking about places where the colonizers form majority after decimating the natives & obviously Africa isnt one where colonizers were majority
+Andy Wilderness U think decimating natives & then forming total majority in large swaths of friggin CONTINENTS like North & South AMERICA & AUSTRALIA is cherrypickin.......lol...i hope u reconsider ur opinion....
+Jo K That's not the case. It's quite serious problem in Japan these days. Work/studying is basically what they mostly do all the time and there's too little left for family/relationships.
+95TurboSol Nope , It shows the stability . India has been prosperous since time immemorial . We were advanced in agricultural techniques and never had War or a major epidemic . A condition required for stability . Hence a huge population .
Love how everyone i the comments is going crazy about population increase , while the Ethnic European population is snowballing downwards... It will be a miracle if Europe would still exist in a few years.
+Kolynk Europe would still exist . And I have no hard feelings for Europeans but they are reaping what they have sown . Had Brits, Spaniards, French and Portuguese stayed put and did not go after plundering world wealth, they would not be facing the current problem .
lol your comment was 4 years ago. now in 2020, we re even more screwed. I am so anxious for our poor planet... its gonna be a death sentence for earth when in 10 years irreversible changes will happen
Planet will thrive when at least 6 Billion die. Ashes to Ashes. If not this Covid-19 then one of the stronger mutations. As nature deserves in all the evil humans cause nonhuman animals and nature. Humans are destroying the oceans and rainforest. Won't be enough clean air at the rate industries are polluting. But Climate Change will be a Game Changer too for non human animals. There just must be a virus the changes the odds. Swine Flu was from humans torturing animal too. Wet Markets are as filthy as factory farms. LOVE BATS now more than ever. Reap What You Sow. Carnist want to eat burned corpses.......it's time for non-human animals to level things out.
Billions: 4:21 - 1804 CE, 1 billion 4:33 - 1927 CE, 2 billion 4:37 - 1963 CE, 3 billion 4:38 - 1967 CE, 4 billion 4:39 - 1988 CE, 5 billion 4:41 - 1999 CE, 6 billion 4:42 - 2010 CE, 7 billion 4:43 - 2023 CE, 8 billion 4:45 - 2040 CE, 9 billion Timelines: (10 years p/sec) 1 CE = 1:19 - Han Dynasty 10 CE = 1:21 50 CE = 1:25 69 CE = 1:27 100 CE = 1:30 200 CE = 1:40 - Roman Empire 420 CE = 2:02 - Golden age of India 500 CE = 2:10 - Mayan Empire 666 CE = 2:27 - Spread of Islam 700 CE = 2:30 1000 CE = 3:00 - Trans-Saharan Trade 1111 CE = 3:12 - Crusades 1234 CE = 3:24 - Mongol Invasion 1337 CE = 3:34 - Black Death 1500 CE = 3:50 - Incan and Aztec Empires 1914 CE = 4:32 - Modern Medicine (1billion people) 1940 CE = 4:35 - World Wars (2billion people) 2000 CE = 4:41 - Green Revolution (6billion people) 2009 CE = 4:42 - (7billion people) 2050 CE = 4:47 - Information age (9billion people) (if the video started from 0:00, it'd count from -790)
People need to realize that fertility rates are dropping gradually all over the world. 100 years ago Germany and Japan had young, rapidly growing populations, and now look at them: old and shrinking. I think 100 years from now, even much of Africa will have already started to gray. I don't think our population is going to grow much past 11 - 12 billion. We'll definitely be shrinking globally by 2150, unless there are major cultural reversals throughout the world.
Joël P As they get richer, their birth rates are going to drop. Just like how The West and East Asia developed and gradually had lower birth rates. Many Middle Eastern countries only have fertility rates of 2 - 3. And Botswana, possibly the most developed country in Africa, only has a fertility rate of 2.3
They are going through a process that all developed countries have to go through to become 1st world, they haven't fully industrialized yet and modern medicine has only just started to make way into these areas. People have lots of children to compensate for the high mortality rate but as soon as modern medicine kicks in these numbers will start to drop because not as many babies are needed to compensate for infant mortality. But soon after modern medicine becomes a standard there will be a population explosion THEN it will stabilize. This will probably happen in the mid 21st century meaning the human race probably won't ever have its 12 billionth human. Hope this helped :)
+Exde Actually, no, that's not how it works. The Black Death in Europe is just like what happened in the Americas when the white people brought their diseases in. It looks like a dark time when in fact, there would have been no plague without a sudden and highly profitable transcontinental communications (i.e. mix of previously isolated populations).
Im sorry but we need another! In India, Middle east! At least China is fightin against Overpopulation but India and middles east not, and there are no good place for live
+Carlos A. Martinez Espinosa Muslims and Christians are against birth control and abortion. I am glad China did it and helped the whole world by reducing pollution.
+TheAs57 China's "helping reduce pollution?" When the air in most of their cities is not even breathable? When their rivers are polluted so much that one time the rivers ran red? Yeah, that sounds like a poster child to the rest of the world for "reducing pollution."
TheAs57 China has weak environmental regulations against corporations. Factories pollute pretty much without contest. As long as China's factories are spewing out pollution like its nobodies business, then cutting back how many kids the 1.357 billion people have is not going to stop shit.
Ireland sure was hit hard. It was growibbg fast during the industrial revolution. Reaching almost 9 million then falling back down to 3 million by 1920 and rising back up to 7 million today. Looks like about 10 million to britains 75 million by 2050. Compared to 8 million in ireland to 12 million in britain in 1840.
dont forget mining colonies in the asteroid belt and a permanent moon base for mining helium 3, (we can use helium 3 for fusion power) it's very useful, there's lots of it on the moon, and it's a clean energy source
Am i the only one who gets a little bit worried because of this, people are already starting WWIII due to population growth, so they might kill half of the world population 3 1/2 billion people, we will be left with devastated people, families and if a full out nuclear war breaks out, even the survivors will die due to natural causes, contaminated water, radiation sickness, im just glad in live in New Zealand, one of the safest places to be if war breaks out because New Zealand has not had a impact on this world, we wont get bombed just taken over and most likely left to fend for ourselves, grow our own food, and just stay alive.
Oh, I'm not worried, because if our capacity for ecological devastation continues to match our population growth, then WWIII should only last about an hour. And I am perfectly OK with our media ignoring this phenomenon, because it has always been my ambition to die fast and without warning. ;-)
+Nanook av Süden Yeah, I see what you're saying. But then there'd probably be a fairly consistent dot appearance rate and I think the point of the video is to show how crazy quick the population is growing and faster dot appearance is more dramatic.
Ya just the number of dots near the end seems impossible to appreciate that sudden shift. Just a sea of yellow. I'm only making the suggestion because it looked as if a lot of effort was put into the video.
Pope Francis: "demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and shared development”.To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the waste products of such consumption. " (Laudato Si)
manualLaborer Why age 11? Why not age 15 or 17? I imagine, not everybody even wants to have sex at age 11. Even in cultures where people still marry very young, isn't it possible that a guy who really cares about his wife, might give her a few more years for her body to better mature, before trying to mate with her? I mean, a wife is supposed to want the sex also? Here are more empty wombs to fill? Is that the message being communicated, by all those very skimpy bikinis on the beach? That seem to be advertising something? I wonder what? Is it possible that more modest attire might be appropriate? And if not, then what happened to speedos for guys then? If guys in prudish America can be more modest, is it okay for women to be more modest?
Okay, we watched this in social studies today, for research. Then, we watched it independently. One of the questions we had to answer was "what was the sound in the background, and what did it represent. All of the people at my table agreed that the heartbeat made them all really really anxious. I did too. I tried it two more times, trying to prove to myself that I wouldn't let that sound set of my anxiety. Both times, I had to throw off my headphones, and slow down my own heart rate. When I got home, and I was on my computer, and I remembered this video. So I looked it up on my home account and found it. I just tried watching it another three times. All of them I have had to mute it towards the end. Oh my god, I can't take the heartbeat!!! Wow!
The heartbeat speeding up, ought to be just fine, if people didn't try to twist it into seeming ominous rather than to celebrate human life growing and spreading.
Sriwijaya empire/Majahapit/Indonesia or whatever you wanna call it was pretty empty with only 1-4 million people in Java island! Then it grows so darn fast
An excellent and memorable presentation, calm yet showing the strain human beings are putting on the planet and its finite resources. It is so important to remember as well that we are not the only species on earth, our actions have a dramatic impact on other wild species, habit and forests.
***** You have a point, so you win this internet argument, as your info made more sense than mine and was well written and well researched. Congrats! But yeah, I have nothing else to write so...
One-child policy is not a bad idea if the Chinese government could do it in a gentle way. In that case, one-child (or two-childrean) policy is the easiest solution to lower the rate of the growth of the population. But since the western world prefer democracy and freedom, we can only decrease the population by having a third world war :(
+Happy Life but western world doesnt have a problem with population growth at all. We are just more responsible of what we doing and more aware of this problem. Better look at wester countries growth. It s not our fault that others do not know how to use democracy properly. They shouldn t have take us as example and our state system :/
+Happy Life It is actually bad, cutting the population in half like that means not enough people to fill up the jobs they have and all the buildings, it also created a generation that doesn't know how to live with siblings, how are they supposed to know how to discipline their children? Reality TV?
LuminaryPrism75 You are right! That's why I have included "Two-Children Policy". The one-child policy has more problems like the overpopulation of elderlies, and it's easier for a single child to get mental illness than a child who has siblings. I think that's why the government has changed it. My point is the MAIN IDEA of One-Child Policy is not very bad. Just like the main idea of communism is not very bad but people decided to do it in a wrong way.
Happy Life Except two children will stunt population growth and keep it at the same level which will also hurt countries, population growth in itself isn't bad as long as it isn't rapid and is under control, population control is actually a good thing, that's why Japan's declining population is a big problem for them over there
Population growth doesn't come from Whites (avg 1.3 fertility rate) nor Hispanics (avg 2.1) nor East Asia (avg 1.5) but from Blacks (in and out of Africa, ranging from 2.5 to 7) and West Asia (avg 2.9).
This information is accurate but also very misleading. By 2050 most the worlds population will be very old, and well passed being fertile. Current global birth rate is barely above replacement levels. And still continuing to fall. After 2050 (assuming we avoid nuclear war, zombie apocalypse and Armageddon ect. which tend to screw up any population estimate) The greatest die off in human history will occur simply from aging. Most countries do not have near enough children to replace their current population. Look at a population graph of japan, and its forecast, they reduced their birth rates first, and are already in a decline, that will in just a decade become a massive die off losing 2/3rds of their population by 2100.
+GhostInTheShell29 Your information is also accurate but, I would argue, misleading. Japan is an outlier and has one of the lowest birth rates in the world. Birth rates in Africa, the Middle East, and Pakistan / India (for example) are well above replacement and populations are still growing very rapidly (many are >3% growth each year), with a majority of these people very young and at an age where they are likely to start families. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_growth_rate
zwillshoes Many countries like China, South Korea most of Europe have followed Japan's lead, its not an outlier its just a decade ahead of most the other counties. Population is still growing very fast in India, even though its getting very close to replacement rate. There's a 2 generation gap before lower birth rates leads to a drop in population. Also Immigration is keeping many countries that would otherwise be shrinking above water. Like Germany for example their in almost as bad as shape as Japan, but with the help of several million immigrants they may be able to maintain their population. By taking in these people from other countries that are overpopulating will reduce the burden on those countries till they reach their own population decline.
It's called the population transition. France was the first country to go through with it in the 1700 to the 1800 fallowed by UK, Europe and the rest of the world. Most of the population increase in 2015 is due to less people dying. Countries like Japan won't loose 2/3 rd of their population, it'll decrease a little yes, but than stabilize and stay the same.
+GhostInTheShell29 You're way off. That only applies for Western and a few east asian countries. South america, africa and most of asia will continue with their population boom well into 2050. Humans will not stop expanding, only white people and the japanese will go extinct.
1. The human population can't grow forever. Finite resources make this mathematically impossible. 2. Something that reduces population, or at least reduces its growth, will occur. 3. Things that reduce population include war, genocide, famine, starvation, disease...and small families. 4. If we don't pick something from that list ourselves, it will be picked for us.
1. A species can grow past the outside resources it has (food/water) it just won't stay there because we'd have alot of deaths. Aslong as you can fertilize babys, population will grow. It doesn't mean it can't or that it's "impossible" 2. Sure it may occur, but not for now. It will occur with the negative side effects because humans are ignorant 3. "Survival of the fittest" turns the back against us afterall after we reach a certain point were we have small resources left 4. True that, nature is hard and can't keep everyone alive. Especially not 15 billion big creatures consuming the planets resources bit by bit
Its not just physical space we lack, its resources to support a growing population. We are still not able to fly outside our solar system. What would be the point of settling Mars if it does not have basic things like oxygen and water to support human life?
moven sun I don't know why but our government is not taking any strict step I will be happy for one child policy or no child policy will be good to decrease population fast
DatAshe 17 Oh dude, Javanese population has quadrupled since the Second World War. If in 1940 it was near 40m now it's about 150m if not 160m. More than Russian 144m.
Population growth is not a problem. It is already solved through efforts of spreading family planning and bringing people out of poverty. The only reason the population is still growing is that the last generation of big families are living longer and not dieing at the same rate but in the next generation families sizes world wide are smaller than ever so the increase won't continue. Just go check out Hans Rosling.
OOhh, my country Philippines was very boring before the Spanish colonization, then in 2050 projection it'ss very lit up, lel, I wonder whats the population that time.
increase in population is never going to be a good idea if the government first is not doing its best to improve crucial services with respect to a growing population to maintain a good talented and well fed population such as education,health, and food production to the least. But yea,they could coward and say yea, the population is big,we are f*cked instead of doing their work.
Radicoly how would you know. There are millions of gays in the world. But in most countries they stay in the closet because their government doesnt allow gay marriage.
Good video. Can't say I'm a fan of the heartbeat for 5 mins straight though. Kinda obnoxious lol. Would have been cool to see historical references for African empires too seeing as there was one shown for Europe, Asia, and the Americas. Mali would have been a good example considering it supplied half of the world's gold up through the middle ages and the Renaissance. Other than that, very interesting video. Thumbs up.
I dont like the term overpopulation. I think underproduction is a better word. If we had unlimited recources then overpopulation would seem like a silly word now wouldent it? as long as we can produce, we can populate. im sure with the new technologies being made we will be fine.
+gabriel crandall if we could harness huge ammounts of energy then things like desalination would be no problem. with the research of fusion and geothermal energy it looks like we are already doing that. even if we use all the "spaceship earth" recources, by that time we might have learned to harvets comets or mine mars resources. Its far fetched, but a carriage with no horse was far fetched too.
+gabriel crandall I geuss we will just have to wait and hope that scientists can invent technoligies that make oil demand less previlant and bring this energy crisis to a close for a while. It can go as you say, we might not invent such devices in time, but I try to stay optomistic about it, that will likely be my downfall however. but with fuison power around the corner, and anti-matter containment being improved regularly, we will hopfuly solve this problem soon. all we can do is wait...
no. In the year 2020 farmers will have to Make more food than they have the last 50 years combined. the only possible answer is stop humping and invest in mass production of GMO foods. the real GMO... not grown
+Sam Wheatley perhaps you have not heard of the term "humidity". I suspect not as you seem to spell similar to a second grader. this amazing thing called "humidity" refers to the ammount of water in the air. in places where this humidity is high, water is easily extracted from the air. therfor, you can get water from thin air. carbon is a major ingredient in food. carbon makes up a large part of our air. there is already technology that takes this carbon and can turn it into oil, therfor calories, and food. food from thin air.... this tech needs to be improved so that it can be cheap enough to use in the 3rd world countries you are crying about. That starts by the first world using it, as we have money to make demand for it. Economics 101 here, when there is demand, eventualy supply will likely follow. this supply will become cheaper to produce to as to give into the demand. we focus on tech, then we can feed everyone.
+Sam Wheatley lets see, parenthisies, you should always have an even number of them, you have three. now then, saying you wont argue simply because you know you are right is a very rude thing to say. Could you imagine if one of the presidential canidates answered a question like that? now, getting food and water from thin air was just one example of acheiving higher food production. I mentioned it because you were saying "Technology can not just produce food and water from thin air." clearly it can however, so I pointed it out so as to show the irony in your comment. Now you keep saying that these new inventions dont work well, well geuss what else did not work well when they were first developed, TV, Telephones, The very decive you are reading this on. technology improves, this is science inquiry level knowledge here, you should know this. also, what does the american debt have to do with any of this?
this isn't fully accurate because the world map looks different. the african continent is WAYYYY bigger than that. most continents fit within africa itself
+theInfamous3 oh and, if you would gather all of us a humans (7 billion) and fit us on the same piece of land, we would roughly fit in los angeles. this planet could hold billions upon billions of people. 7 billion is less than you think. the western greedy policy of having-it-all is what's fucking up the balance and making other countries broke for the benefit of their own
+theInfamous3 It's a typical projection map. It distorts things by making everything larger than it actually is the further away from the equator one looks. It does not make a huge difference until one gets to really high latitudes.
It's called a map. You know earth is a sphere right? You can't map it without distorting something. Btw., Africa is big enough in this one. The polar regions are the ones that are bigger in reality.
The problem is that the people who are going to dramatically increase human population cannot even watch this video
.
+Aleksandar Karaivanov that is way we most rise the living standards of poor people and make education more available.
+Лучшего Лучшего are we talking about communism again Russia? probably a reason why it did work the fist time. communism is is evil and oppressive.
What about Indians? I mean I know India is still a developing nation. But don't they at least have Internet?
Noah Monnig you never lived under communism neither have i but based on my parents talkings they had a better life at communist yugoslavia. The system doesn’t matter as long as the leaders are honest and not criminals as todays so called politicians
GameAddict51 Literacy rate in India is 74%. The poor living in rural India and Muslims are contributing to the increasing population. Birthrate in Bombay n Delhi are 1.62 avg which is less than London, where it is 1.72.
*Black Death plays*
Europe: Shiiiiiiiiiet
*Next age plays*
Europe: Nevermind, i'm all good.
Corona virus has entered the game
Asia, the middle east, europe: holy shit what the fuck is that thing. Why are people turning black and decomposing while still alive.. must be gods wrath for human sins, witches and demons that unleashed this pestilence upon us.
Reminds me of Bill Wurtz's "history of the entire world, i guess"
"Whoops, half of Europe just died."
Am I the only one who finds the heartbeat speeding up discomforting?
ToddE GameZ That's the point. To show us that more humans meant more dangerous which makes you feel discomfort. You can see it corresponds with the dots. The more the faster
Donut
Well that is an unproven assumption that likely is false. More humans should not mean more dangerous. Scare-tactic anti-life propaganda.
Also, had the map been calibrated correctly to tell the truth, it would show that the world is still mostly empty of people. It is a type of graph, technically-speaking, and even a basic line graph, no matter how low the numbers, will nearly reach the top of the space or the paper, because graphs are usually calibrated to show the most information reasonably possible. A line graph of world population size over time, calibrated with the top of the graph, being the world filled up to "no elbow room" levels, would show a boring flat line that does nothing, all the way across. Even the early cities of Adam and Eve's time, a world population of just a few 1000s of people, might look something like a "modern day population explosion", by the normal means of calibrating graphs. But to read it in that manner, would be extremely misleading, as the world was mostly empty of people.
In a world that could hold trillions of people if ever it had to, 7.4 billion people is less than 1% of capacity, and so the graph might only have a tiny few specks of white on it. Even on overexposed photos of the globe at night, the world is mostly dark. Areas of white lit up by cities, are not very much. Even a "solid white" world, would not be anywhere close to being full of people.
+Donut dont listen to +Yosef Macgruber. Hes a brainwashed trump supporter
Woah, I didn't intend on an argument starting
+ToddE GameZ listen mang, this fool believe the earth is 6000> years old! believes global warming doesnt exist, believe religion will solve every problem, believes overpopulation is a complete myth, and hes a trump supporter possibly from the south
When I see the world map covered in dots, I can't help but think about Plague Inc.
Nyta - Gore the game
Well ironically the black death reduced the amount of spots. Obviously. XD
Lol I love that game
i love plague inc players
same i love that game
Did someone spill yellow paint on india?
Woops
Yes
Nigeria is also a full yellow mass
Guess Indian is one of those ancient civilizations which can still get _HARD_. Someone need to steal that Kamasutra before its too late. :D
yea
At this time, nearly 43% of the whole human population are either Indian or Chinese....
Nope.. Africans
No wonder India & China had seen golden times when whole remaining world was in dark age. These lands naturally supports human life. They were the first to be civilized. May be that is also a reason why India(Hindu) and China(Buddhists) never attacked on other people and looted them; b'coz they already were the reachest.
+Darshil Kapadia do the right thing, don't reproduce there are too many Indians and Chinese simple as that
+Darshil Kapadia we're not Buddhists. only monk is.
+沃特这法克 talking @ golden age
Darshil Kapadia golden age also only monk is Buddhists.tang dynasty State religion is Taoism.and tang neighboor is persia,so is not never attacked other people.
Richest*
Hahaha
Well, Australia was boring...
Well, what about Groenland? :)
+Cyril d'Audiffret
*Greenland
+Nathanchooper They can really only live on the coast though, the Outback is too dangerous
Australia has about the same population as Taiwan
Only started getting dots in the 1800s when we started sending our prisoners there
India and China Have NEVER Had A Huge Population Decrease...... They're Only Increasing... :-|
+M. Cloak The great leap forward and the cultural revolution was the most recent massive population decreases in china, and there has been other massacres and wars there throughout history
You should have told that to European settlers...they breeded so much that they colonised USA,New Zealand,Canada,South America,Australia.....man....just stop plz
+Andy Wilderness
I was talking about places where the colonizers form majority after decimating the natives & obviously Africa isnt one where colonizers were majority
+Andy Wilderness
U think decimating natives & then forming total majority in large swaths of friggin CONTINENTS like North & South AMERICA & AUSTRALIA is cherrypickin.......lol...i hope u reconsider ur opinion....
No..... U are wrong
Who else is watching this for class?
YES BABEEE
MEEEE
meee i have an exam tmrw!
Me
My teacher assigned me to watch this 😭
Notice how Japan stopped growing.
+Charles Dawson 70% of Japan's mountainous, so she's pretty filled up.
+Freedom Fighter
And not having children. Just total apathy basically.
+Jo K That's not the case. It's quite serious problem in Japan these days. Work/studying is basically what they mostly do all the time and there's too little left for family/relationships.
And china
No marriage for economic problem
Imagine when your playing plague inc.
GumbaverianX You:What the..
Xd that'd be impossible
My "playing plague inc." is what?
Take away? Asia and India know how to PARTY! lol
+95TurboSol Nope , It shows the stability . India has been prosperous since time immemorial . We were advanced in agricultural techniques and never had War or a major epidemic . A condition required for stability . Hence a huge population .
Anshuman Nayak
True, but I like the party idea better lol
India IS in Asia
Abhisek Shrestha And your point !!!!
The comment says "Asia and India" and my point is the two are not separate entities but one lies in the other. Understood?
This is literally outdated info now.
School still insists on using this video
Me during the video: Dang Asia.
Same. That's why Asia has 60% of the world's population. Most of this population is in India and China.
Way to go Asia. They should be having even more babies. More and more people would be glad to live.
sama
Yosef MacGruber lol no, Asia's greedy already, why do you want them to have even more people?
@@xavionvynne370 Asia having a larger population doesn't make them greedy
Love how everyone i the comments is going crazy about population increase , while the Ethnic European population is snowballing downwards... It will be a miracle if Europe would still exist in a few years.
+It Macze Maybe they feel too fucked ? :D
+Kolynk Europe would still exist . And I have no hard feelings for Europeans but they are reaping what they have sown . Had Brits, Spaniards, French and Portuguese stayed put and did not go after plundering world wealth, they would not be facing the current problem .
Okiedokie It's been 3 years scince your comment, White people are still okay.
Europe will exist, but a white people shall be a minority there, since the European borders are too open. We need to close them.
8 years and things are going fine
We exploded in the Industrial rev holy shit...
Zox Sonic And modern medicine especially
And yet, its proponents blame it all on religion and lack of education. GO FIGURE!
that is part of the equation dumb ass
Zox Sonic alot more in modern medicine
So let the human population grow and spread naturally as it was meant to. Without any nasty birth control to hinder.
I remember seeing what I believe was an earlier version of this excellent video. It was a video tape and I showed it to all my classes! Thank you!
Still not 1 dot on Greenland...
Greenland will never get a dot lol they only have 60 thousand people
Only 50000 people live in Greenland today
How much does 1 dot represent?
Nvm its 1 million.
No...it melted in Climate Change.
My teacher assigned this video, what a tremendous waste of time.
same -_-
Man this planet is screwed.
lol your comment was 4 years ago. now in 2020, we re even more screwed. I am so anxious for our poor planet... its gonna be a death sentence for earth when in 10 years irreversible changes will happen
@@charlesandrieux6951 people say that all the time. Environmentalists are like watermelons. I mean, if watermelons were communists.
its worse now
Planet will thrive when at least 6 Billion die. Ashes to Ashes. If not this Covid-19 then one of the stronger mutations. As nature deserves in all the evil humans cause nonhuman animals and nature. Humans are destroying the oceans and rainforest. Won't be enough clean air at the rate industries are polluting. But Climate Change will be a Game Changer too for non human animals. There just must be a virus the changes the odds. Swine Flu was from humans torturing animal too. Wet Markets are as filthy as factory farms. LOVE BATS now more than ever. Reap What You Sow. Carnist want to eat burned corpses.......it's time for non-human animals to level things out.
Billions:
4:21 - 1804 CE, 1 billion
4:33 - 1927 CE, 2 billion
4:37 - 1963 CE, 3 billion
4:38 - 1967 CE, 4 billion
4:39 - 1988 CE, 5 billion
4:41 - 1999 CE, 6 billion
4:42 - 2010 CE, 7 billion
4:43 - 2023 CE, 8 billion
4:45 - 2040 CE, 9 billion
Timelines:
(10 years p/sec)
1 CE = 1:19 - Han Dynasty
10 CE = 1:21
50 CE = 1:25
69 CE = 1:27
100 CE = 1:30
200 CE = 1:40 - Roman Empire
420 CE = 2:02 - Golden age of India
500 CE = 2:10 - Mayan Empire
666 CE = 2:27 - Spread of Islam
700 CE = 2:30
1000 CE = 3:00 - Trans-Saharan Trade
1111 CE = 3:12 - Crusades
1234 CE = 3:24 - Mongol Invasion
1337 CE = 3:34 - Black Death
1500 CE = 3:50 - Incan and Aztec Empires
1914 CE = 4:32 - Modern Medicine (1billion people)
1940 CE = 4:35 - World Wars (2billion people)
2000 CE = 4:41 - Green Revolution (6billion people)
2009 CE = 4:42 - (7billion people)
2050 CE = 4:47 - Information age (9billion people)
(if the video started from 0:00, it'd count from -790)
661 for islam.not 666
All these numbers are guestimates and are probably half of what is stated.
Now 8 billion people
its crazy how the area of the world we evolved in turns out not to be the best place for us to live
People need to realize that fertility rates are dropping gradually all over the world. 100 years ago Germany and Japan had young, rapidly growing populations, and now look at them: old and shrinking. I think 100 years from now, even much of Africa will have already started to gray. I don't think our population is going to grow much past 11 - 12 billion. We'll definitely be shrinking globally by 2150, unless there are major cultural reversals throughout the world.
Negation F but afrcans make 6 babies per women and muslim countries around 4... I don't see how the population will shrink
Joël P As they get richer, their birth rates are going to drop. Just like how The West and East Asia developed and gradually had lower birth rates. Many Middle Eastern countries only have fertility rates of 2 - 3. And Botswana, possibly the most developed country in Africa, only has a fertility rate of 2.3
fucking idiot
The Legend 566 whatevs
They are going through a process that all developed countries have to go through to become 1st world, they haven't fully industrialized yet and modern medicine has only just started to make way into these areas. People have lots of children to compensate for the high mortality rate but as soon as modern medicine kicks in these numbers will start to drop because not as many babies are needed to compensate for infant mortality. But soon after modern medicine becomes a standard there will be a population explosion THEN it will stabilize. This will probably happen in the mid 21st century meaning the human race probably won't ever have its 12 billionth human. Hope this helped :)
After WWI and WWII, population increased from 2 billion to 4 billion
*Ironic*
Just pay attention to Europe between 1300 and 1400 :)
Gg
+Exde That kinda made me laugh haha
+Exde Actually, no, that's not how it works. The Black Death in Europe is just like what happened in the Americas when the white people brought their diseases in. It looks like a dark time when in fact, there would have been no plague without a sudden and highly profitable transcontinental communications (i.e. mix of previously isolated populations).
+MMOStein Genius. I didn't notice that the first time I watched the video.
Im sorry but we need another! In India, Middle east! At least China is fightin against Overpopulation but India and middles east not, and there are no good place for live
Why don't we just have ONE kid as a maximum? The population won't grow up, it will stabilize by itself in a few decades...
+Carlos A. Martinez Espinosa Hell even a 2 child replacement rate would neglect any sort of growth. Agree 100% Carlos.
+Carlos A. Martinez Espinosa Muslims and Christians are against birth control and abortion. I am glad China did it and helped the whole world by reducing pollution.
+TheAs57 China's "helping reduce pollution?" When the air in most of their cities is not even breathable? When their rivers are polluted so much that one time the rivers ran red? Yeah, that sounds like a poster child to the rest of the world for "reducing pollution."
TheAs57 China has weak environmental regulations against corporations. Factories pollute pretty much without contest. As long as China's factories are spewing out pollution like its nobodies business, then cutting back how many kids the 1.357 billion people have is not going to stop shit.
Did it work in China?
Well that escalated quickly.
Btw , the population didn't start declining right in 1300 , but only after 1346 which is when the plague started
I just think this means general century population, or it could be a mistake
But Mongolian kill before the plague
Zeyu Tan The Mongols never got as far as Germany and Italy (Unless you count the Huns)
True, but across Europe were massive famines and droughts which did kill people
the heartbeat was pure creepy...
Ireland sure was hit hard. It was growibbg fast during the industrial revolution. Reaching almost 9 million then falling back down to 3 million by 1920 and rising back up to 7 million today. Looks like about 10 million to britains 75 million by 2050. Compared to 8 million in ireland to 12 million in britain in 1840.
How hard do the famine hit goddamn. Curse you Britain
So, when the condom commercials hit to Asia?
AHAAAHHHAHA🤣
We NEED to colonize space.
A permanent Mars colony perhaps, if it's possible.
That's not going to be possible anytime soon and what shall you grow on Mars. I do not know. probably nothing. Two child limit is the best idea. ,
dont forget mining colonies in the asteroid belt and a permanent moon base for mining helium 3, (we can use helium 3 for fusion power) it's very useful, there's lots of it on the moon, and it's a clean energy source
well, we'll probably have to farm in our own shit...
That's the job for our grand children. It's the mission of 22nd century, not 21st century.
some countries are covered dots completely
Am i the only one who gets a little bit worried because of this, people are already starting WWIII due to population growth, so they might kill half of the world population 3 1/2 billion people, we will be left with devastated people, families and if a full out nuclear war breaks out, even the survivors will die due to natural causes, contaminated water, radiation sickness, im just glad in live in New Zealand, one of the safest places to be if war breaks out because New Zealand has not had a impact on this world, we wont get bombed just taken over and most likely left to fend for ourselves, grow our own food, and just stay alive.
TheAsomeTeam "we" nigga what?
Oh, I'm not worried, because if our capacity for ecological devastation continues to match our population growth, then WWIII should only last about an hour. And I am perfectly OK with our media ignoring this phenomenon, because it has always been my ambition to die fast and without warning. ;-)
A full scale nuclear war would cause a huge nuclear winter. It doesn't matter where you are, we'll all be fucked one way or another.
lol
Why Svalbard and Greenland aren't independant and Svalbard isn't even a country.
It might have been useful to change the legend to fit a uniform scale. Something like:
Early: Dot = 1000
Late: Dot = 10 Million
+Nanook av Süden But...that's not uniform
The scale between time and the dot is uniform. Time increase, dot representation increase. Uniform.
+Nanook av Süden Yeah, I see what you're saying. But then there'd probably be a fairly consistent dot appearance rate and I think the point of the video is to show how crazy quick the population is growing and faster dot appearance is more dramatic.
Ya just the number of dots near the end seems impossible to appreciate that sudden shift. Just a sea of yellow. I'm only making the suggestion because it looked as if a lot of effort was put into the video.
I was playing epic music and the beat dropped at the industrial revolution
Pope Francis: "demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and shared development”.To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the waste products of such consumption. " (Laudato Si)
great video, but did anyone else find the noise in the background a bit disturbing?
whyd you have to make the timelapse part of the video sound so scary
good video
would love to see a zoom on each continent to get more detailed explanations
I hope there is life on Earth 2.0
Sir Altitude flash?
We still have a lot of space left. Everbody make babies this weekend.
Space isn't an issue. It's resources
There are way too many empty wombs out there. Put some babies in them people! Grow more beautiful humans!
+Yosef MacGruber - i hope you have all daughters who are fertile when they're 11 - then you can announce: here are more empty wombs to fill.
manualLaborer
Why age 11? Why not age 15 or 17? I imagine, not everybody even wants to have sex at age 11. Even in cultures where people still marry very young, isn't it possible that a guy who really cares about his wife, might give her a few more years for her body to better mature, before trying to mate with her? I mean, a wife is supposed to want the sex also?
Here are more empty wombs to fill? Is that the message being communicated, by all those very skimpy bikinis on the beach? That seem to be advertising something? I wonder what? Is it possible that more modest attire might be appropriate? And if not, then what happened to speedos for guys then? If guys in prudish America can be more modest, is it okay for women to be more modest?
Yosef MacGruber SJW alert
Africa's population has grown so fast
Mohamed al habib .Is it your problem?
Carol yes it is my problem
Dang this is super interesting. Mainly just how ever since the agricultural revolutions the population has skyrocketed and hasn't really stopped.
I here in Japan the numbers are going downnnn!
Humanity: Vibing.
Industrial Revolution: I'm about to do what's called a *pro gamer move* .
😂😂😂 most underrated comment of all time
Okay, we watched this in social studies today, for research. Then, we watched it independently. One of the questions we had to answer was "what was the sound in the background, and what did it represent. All of the people at my table agreed that the heartbeat made them all really really anxious. I did too. I tried it two more times, trying to prove to myself that I wouldn't let that sound set of my anxiety. Both times, I had to throw off my headphones, and slow down my own heart rate. When I got home, and I was on my computer, and I remembered this video. So I looked it up on my home account and found it. I just tried watching it another three times. All of them I have had to mute it towards the end. Oh my god, I can't take the heartbeat!!! Wow!
The heartbeat speeding up, ought to be just fine, if people didn't try to twist it into seeming ominous rather than to celebrate human life growing and spreading.
So, the moral is human population is dependent on resources. Do not blame any region or religion.
Sriwijaya empire/Majahapit/Indonesia or whatever you wanna call it was pretty empty with only 1-4 million people in Java island! Then it grows so darn fast
An excellent and memorable presentation, calm yet showing the strain human beings are putting on the planet and its finite resources. It is so important to remember as well that we are not the only species on earth, our actions have a dramatic impact on other wild species, habit and forests.
***** You have a point, so you win this internet argument, as your info made more sense than mine and was well written and well researched. Congrats!
But yeah, I have nothing else to write so...
***** Thanks, you too :P
Thanos: Well, that looks like a Job for me!
4:43 this is 2017!
Yes,Also The Benelux Peninsula Is Also Filled With Yellow Paint
At 1876 CE Everyone around the Baltic States are so high, but no one is in the Baltics.
4:29 For the beat to go faster.
One-child policy is not a bad idea if the Chinese government could do it in a gentle way. In that case, one-child (or two-childrean) policy is the easiest solution to lower the rate of the growth of the population. But since the western world prefer democracy and freedom, we can only decrease the population by having a third world war :(
+Happy Life but western world doesnt have a problem with population growth at all. We are just more responsible of what we doing and more aware of this problem. Better look at wester countries growth. It s not our fault that others do not know how to use democracy properly. They shouldn t have take us as example and our state system :/
dzidzio777 Yeah :)
+Happy Life It is actually bad, cutting the population in half like that means not enough people to fill up the jobs they have and all the buildings, it also created a generation that doesn't know how to live with siblings, how are they supposed to know how to discipline their children? Reality TV?
LuminaryPrism75 You are right! That's why I have included "Two-Children Policy". The one-child policy has more problems like the overpopulation of elderlies, and it's easier for a single child to get mental illness than a child who has siblings. I think that's why the government has changed it. My point is the MAIN IDEA of One-Child Policy is not very bad. Just like the main idea of communism is not very bad but people decided to do it in a wrong way.
Happy Life Except two children will stunt population growth and keep it at the same level which will also hurt countries, population growth in itself isn't bad as long as it isn't rapid and is under control, population control is actually a good thing, that's why Japan's declining population is a big problem for them over there
*Brazil had 10 million indigenous before 1500*
*I don't have seen 10 points in brazil*
Population growth doesn't come from Whites (avg 1.3 fertility rate) nor Hispanics (avg 2.1) nor East Asia (avg 1.5) but from Blacks (in and out of Africa, ranging from 2.5 to 7) and West Asia (avg 2.9).
Can you make an updated version
China Japan India Pakistan and Indonesia are like freaking light bulbs
This information is accurate but also very misleading. By 2050 most the worlds population will be very old, and well passed being fertile.
Current global birth rate is barely above replacement levels. And still continuing to fall.
After 2050 (assuming we avoid nuclear war, zombie apocalypse and Armageddon ect. which tend to screw up any population estimate)
The greatest die off in human history will occur simply from aging. Most countries do not have near enough children to replace their current population.
Look at a population graph of japan, and its forecast, they reduced their birth rates first, and are already in a decline, that will in just a decade become a massive die off losing 2/3rds of their population by 2100.
+GhostInTheShell29 Your information is also accurate but, I would argue, misleading. Japan is an outlier and has one of the lowest birth rates in the world. Birth rates in Africa, the Middle East, and Pakistan / India (for example) are well above replacement and populations are still growing very rapidly (many are >3% growth each year), with a majority of these people very young and at an age where they are likely to start families. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_growth_rate
zwillshoes Many countries like China, South Korea most of Europe have followed Japan's lead, its not an outlier its just a decade ahead of most the other counties.
Population is still growing very fast in India, even though its getting very close to replacement rate. There's a 2 generation gap before lower birth rates leads to a drop in population.
Also Immigration is keeping many countries that would otherwise be shrinking above water. Like Germany for example their in almost as bad as shape as Japan, but with the help of several million immigrants they may be able to maintain their population. By taking in these people from other countries that are overpopulating will reduce the burden on those countries till they reach their own population decline.
It's called the population transition. France was the first country to go through with it in the 1700 to the 1800 fallowed by UK, Europe and the rest of the world. Most of the population increase in 2015 is due to less people dying. Countries like Japan won't loose 2/3 rd of their population, it'll decrease a little yes, but than stabilize and stay the same.
+hillcon45 Wow, The History Is A BIG Timeline, Like This World Population Map Here, It Slowly Grows At First, But Then, It Grew Faster And Faster
+GhostInTheShell29 You're way off. That only applies for Western and a few east asian countries. South america, africa and most of asia will continue with their population boom well into 2050. Humans will not stop expanding, only white people and the japanese will go extinct.
I actually find it relieving during the Black Death.
The heartbeat makes the time-lapse and the appearing and disappearing yellow dots look eerie.
The percussion was a distraction due to my hearing problem.
Thank you for your work putting together this very sobering video.
Anyone from India🇮🇳
Anyone here for school???
1. The human population can't grow forever. Finite resources make this mathematically impossible.
2. Something that reduces population, or at least reduces its growth, will occur.
3. Things that reduce population include war, genocide, famine, starvation, disease...and small families.
4. If we don't pick something from that list ourselves, it will be picked for us.
1. A species can grow past the outside resources it has (food/water) it just won't stay there because we'd have alot of deaths. Aslong as you can fertilize babys, population will grow. It doesn't mean it can't or that it's "impossible"
2. Sure it may occur, but not for now. It will occur with the negative side effects because humans are ignorant
3. "Survival of the fittest" turns the back against us afterall after we reach a certain point were we have small resources left
4. True that, nature is hard and can't keep everyone alive. Especially not 15 billion big creatures consuming the planets resources bit by bit
my heart tried to go with the beat when it showed the population growth (my chest hurt a little when it started)
Pretty sure that we will find more space (i.e. interplanetary travel) before we run out of space
More space in the space xD
Its not just physical space we lack, its resources to support a growing population. We are still not able to fly outside our solar system. What would be the point of settling Mars if it does not have basic things like oxygen and water to support human life?
The video points out that square footage is not the issue
We most likely won't actually. The planet is already dying, and NASA is far away from actually planning missions to inhabit other worlds.
Don't forget to add
2020 - Covid-19
Deaths: a lot
population is increasing rapidly even through the virus
Not enough. If a few BILLION a year then maybe it'll buy some time. Stronger Mutations of Coronavirus is needed to help this planet and other Species.
well ,CHINA population is going down every year,resulted from one child policy……seem like the population problem for planet is AFICA AND INDIA
And East-Asia, one small island in the Indonesia has a larger population than in Russia.
There are too many people there dont take them as immigrants into your country, so they can learn their lessons.
Otto von Bismark i think Ur talking about bangladesh
moven sun I don't know why but our government is not taking any strict step
I will be happy for one child policy or no child policy will be good to decrease population fast
DatAshe 17 Oh dude, Javanese population has quadrupled since the Second World War. If in 1940 it was near 40m now it's about 150m if not 160m. More than Russian 144m.
Dude look at Europe in "Black Death".
Why Does The Music Sound Doubled?
Population growing is not the world's main problem.
It is the way of living of the most richest billion people!
Population growth is not a problem. It is already solved through efforts of spreading family planning and bringing people out of poverty. The only reason the population is still growing is that the last generation of big families are living longer and not dieing at the same rate but in the next generation families sizes world wide are smaller than ever so the increase won't continue. Just go check out Hans Rosling.
This sounds like eugenics to me!
+jacob moore How so?
Lol still no people in Australia before 1850😂😂😂😂😂
It was the last large land mass to be discovered.
It was New Zealand. But i get what you're saying.
native people lived that day
since 1ce till 2050 my plaace is always crowded
What the..... How come Britain and Ireland doesn't reach 1 million till 970 CE? Wow
My reaction at Industrial era: HOLY SH*T WTF XD
Philippines is descovered at year 1521 by magellan
OOhh, my country Philippines was very boring before the Spanish colonization, then in 2050 projection it'ss very lit up, lel, I wonder whats the population that time.
Increase in population is never a good idea. You will so learn this some time soon.
increase in population is never going to be a good idea if the government first is not doing its best to improve crucial services with respect to a growing population to maintain a good talented and well fed population such as education,health, and food production to the least. But yea,they could coward and say yea, the population is big,we are f*cked instead of doing their work.
we will have 155million population in 2050
northern canada, siberia, tibet, sahara desert, amazon jungle, westhern australia, have a lot of space
The planet isn’t only for humans what about other animals who need homes
watch half the entire dots vanish after 2020
and this s the reason why gays are needed. All countries should allow gay marriege.
China is becoming a very gay nation, because of their limitations on offspring, they are producing an alarming rate of men to women.
99% of people aren't gay so that wouldn't make much of a difference.
Radicoly how would you know. There are millions of gays in the world. But in most countries they stay in the closet because their government doesnt allow gay marriage.
The thing is even if there we're 50 million gay people there are 6.5 BILLION more straight people so it still makes no difference!
Lol, yea millions sounds like a lot, but compared to billions its nothing.
Fucking scary :/
Wonder what happens if everyone who has chronic disease simply disappeared even non-lethal ones.
Bélver Cáceres i know India has more people then in Africa,
Bélver Cáceres you say a badword
We'll stagnate at 10 billion.
Hope so
Yes. And our standards of living will be cut in half.
SolarPenguin
Only if you live in Asia or Africa...
Good video. Can't say I'm a fan of the heartbeat for 5 mins straight though. Kinda obnoxious lol. Would have been cool to see historical references for African empires too seeing as there was one shown for Europe, Asia, and the Americas. Mali would have been a good example considering it supplied half of the world's gold up through the middle ages and the Renaissance. Other than that, very interesting video. Thumbs up.
India and Bangladesh, ahem... why do you need huge families when you have no space?
India's 1.35 billion population only lives in 10% of its total land area.And recent day maximum 2 baby per family
I dont like the term overpopulation. I think underproduction is a better word. If we had unlimited recources then overpopulation would seem like a silly word now wouldent it? as long as we can produce, we can populate. im sure with the new technologies being made we will be fine.
+gabriel crandall if we could harness huge ammounts of energy then things like desalination would be no problem. with the research of fusion and geothermal energy it looks like we are already doing that. even if we use all the "spaceship earth" recources, by that time we might have learned to harvets comets or mine mars resources.
Its far fetched, but a carriage with no horse was far fetched too.
+gabriel crandall I geuss we will just have to wait and hope that scientists can invent technoligies that make oil demand less previlant and bring this energy crisis to a close for a while. It can go as you say, we might not invent such devices in time, but I try to stay optomistic about it, that will likely be my downfall however.
but with fuison power around the corner, and anti-matter containment being improved regularly, we will hopfuly solve this problem soon.
all we can do is wait...
no. In the year 2020 farmers will have to Make more food than they have the last 50 years combined. the only possible answer is stop humping and invest in mass production of GMO foods. the real GMO... not grown
+Sam Wheatley perhaps you have not heard of the term "humidity". I suspect not as you seem to spell similar to a second grader. this amazing thing called "humidity" refers to the ammount of water in the air. in places where this humidity is high, water is easily extracted from the air. therfor, you can get water from thin air.
carbon is a major ingredient in food. carbon makes up a large part of our air. there is already technology that takes this carbon and can turn it into oil, therfor calories, and food.
food from thin air....
this tech needs to be improved so that it can be cheap enough to use in the 3rd world countries you are crying about. That starts by the first world using it, as we have money to make demand for it. Economics 101 here, when there is demand, eventualy supply will likely follow. this supply will become cheaper to produce to as to give into the demand.
we focus on tech, then we can feed everyone.
+Sam Wheatley lets see, parenthisies, you should always have an even number of them, you have three.
now then, saying you wont argue simply because you know you are right is a very rude thing to say. Could you imagine if one of the presidential canidates answered a question like that?
now, getting food and water from thin air was just one example of acheiving higher food production. I mentioned it because you were saying "Technology can not just produce food and water from thin air." clearly it can however, so I pointed it out so as to show the irony in your comment. Now you keep saying that these new inventions dont work well, well geuss what else did not work well when they were first developed, TV, Telephones, The very decive you are reading this on. technology improves, this is science inquiry level knowledge here, you should know this.
also, what does the american debt have to do with any of this?
If couples stop having 3 kids that would help a lot and If couples had only 1 each that would solve it
But I'm just one man. how can I change the world.
+lxCRON1Cxl Ignore those two assholes :)
The assholes have been banned for hate speech.
Ne Xus528 lol, I don't want that he does that, but if he wants to change the world population then dying is a way.
You do your part, makes a tiny difference. 7 billion tiny differences later and the world is changed
do the math, if half of the people kill themselves, the population is halved!
What about Greenland? Some ppl live there too.
Area 51 must be playing plague inc on the wrong computer
If you had this for homework,
👇⬅do that = 😎
this isn't fully accurate because the world map looks different. the african continent is WAYYYY bigger than that. most continents fit within africa itself
+theInfamous3 oh and, if you would gather all of us a humans (7 billion) and fit us on the same piece of land, we would roughly fit in los angeles. this planet could hold billions upon billions of people. 7 billion is less than you think. the western greedy policy of having-it-all is what's fucking up the balance and making other countries broke for the benefit of their own
+theInfamous3 Over-population doesn't only consider land mass...
+theInfamous3 It's a typical projection map. It distorts things by making everything larger than it actually is the further away from the equator one looks. It does not make a huge difference until one gets to really high latitudes.
It's called a map. You know earth is a sphere right? You can't map it without distorting something. Btw., Africa is big enough in this one. The polar regions are the ones that are bigger in reality.
Lars T. Sorry if I aggravated you, father, please forgive me, have mercy on me
Please. Get me off this planet...
lol
In other video the total population is nearly only 3.30 million. Then what this video wants to show ?
Basically in 1960 the yellow paint went crazy...