I don't know if this could have been a bit easier... I would have padded the outside of the comb, then do a linear pattern for the comb teeth, then a pocket to set the inclination angle, and finally do the outside fillet but regardless, I still appreciate that you explain and show us other tools, tips, tricks, etc.
Hi, Darren. Great job! In 36:12, couldn't you have made the top two points of the rectangle symmetrical with respect to the Y axis, to avoid the gap in the middle of the comb?
Did you do this in part design because it was the best way, or to show it could be done? I am still struggling to work out whether part design should only be used for simple parts.
People tend to use that the most and I knew you would get into a few challenges trying to complete the model. So thought it would a good example of mixing workbenchs. Part workbench is so much more flexible and as you say part design can fall down when a model gets to complex. I have a video on my channel regarding part vs part design which explains the reason why they exist and when to choose one over the other.
Looks complex at the beginning, but it is simple at the end. Thank you!
You are welcome! 😊 Everything is hard until you in know how 😁
It was
Great. Thank you uns happy X-Mas 🙂
Glad you enjoyed. And I hope you have had a great Xmas and wishing your all the best for the new year.
I don't know if this could have been a bit easier...
I would have padded the outside of the comb, then do a linear pattern for the comb teeth, then a pocket to set the inclination angle, and finally do the outside fillet
but regardless, I still appreciate that you explain and show us other tools, tips, tricks, etc.
Place the arc center on the y axis then you don't need the tangent construction line.
Or just make the arc and line tangent.
Hi, Darren. Great job! In 36:12, couldn't you have made the top two points of the rectangle symmetrical with respect to the Y axis, to avoid the gap in the middle of the comb?
any reason you made the arcs tangent to a construction line as apposed to normal to the normal to the y-axis?
Just showing a technique that can be used in multiple scenario when other lines or axis are not available.
Did you do this in part design because it was the best way, or to show it could be done? I am still struggling to work out whether part design should only be used for simple parts.
People tend to use that the most and I knew you would get into a few challenges trying to complete the model. So thought it would a good example of mixing workbenchs. Part workbench is so much more flexible and as you say part design can fall down when a model gets to complex. I have a video on my channel regarding part vs part design which explains the reason why they exist and when to choose one over the other.