Stop using a false god to read the bible?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • In this thought-provoking video, we delve into the fascinating world of hermeneutics and its role in biblical interpretation. Hermeneutics, a method used by many to understand the Bible, has origins that may surprise you. While it’s a widely accepted practice among scholars and theologians, its roots trace back to philosophical traditions linked to other gods and ancient beliefs. This raises an important question: should Christians rely on a method with such origins to interpret sacred texts? We explore the implications of this connection and examine whether it aligns with Christian values and beliefs.
    Join us as we uncover the historical background of hermeneutics and its impact on modern biblical interpretation. This video aims to spark a discussion about the appropriateness of using methods derived from non-Christian traditions in the study of the Bible. Key search terms include "hermeneutics in biblical interpretation," "Christianity and hermeneutics," "origin of hermeneutics," and "biblical interpretation methods." Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more content exploring the intersection of faith and scholarly methods!
    #fypviral #godsword #bibleinterpretation #hermeneutics #biblestudy #falseworship #godalone #bibletruth #bible #sabbath #holyspirit #christiantiktok #christianity #christ #prayerwarrior #prayer #fyppp #biblereading #biblereadings #calvanist #greek #faithjourney #faithbasedpodcast

Комментарии • 23

  • @ColinWrubleski-eq5sh
    @ColinWrubleski-eq5sh Месяц назад +1

    I am now highly tempted to write a novel wherein the two villains are named Hermann Utticks and Archibald ("Archie") Piscopal...^^

  • @ghostgate82
    @ghostgate82 Месяц назад +4

    What we call a thing is far less important than what a thing does. The Hubble and Webb telescopes are named after flawed men, but what the telescopes do is far more important than their name. Modern Christians really need to zoom out a bit and stop being afraid of everything.

    • @trooperman1080
      @trooperman1080 Месяц назад +1

      Well said

    • @Simply-FI_Show
      @Simply-FI_Show  Месяц назад +1

      @@ghostgate82 Good point! My question is this: Jesus asked Peter “who do you say I am?” Peter replied “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God”. Jesus replied “blessed are you … for flesh & blood did not reveal this to you, but my Father in heaven”.
      The spirit of God revealed truth to Peter. Jesus promised the Spirit of truth to come & lead us into ALL truth.
      When we consider hermeneutics, what role does the Holy Spirit play, when a clear “Thus saith the LORD” is overrided because a manmade method of interpretation is preferred?

    • @ghostgate82
      @ghostgate82 Месяц назад

      @@Simply-FI_Show Hermenutics is just a name. What is the method? The method is the same method Peter used to know who Jesus is. There has to be a logic to confirm, because if there isn’t, anyone and everyone can proclaim they have the Holy Spirit. This happens a lot, especially over the past 200 years. Logic is a spiritual trellis. Peter used Logic.

    • @Simply-FI_Show
      @Simply-FI_Show  Месяц назад

      @@ghostgate82 Jesus says the Father revealed it to Peter. So is using logic & receiving (& believing) a revelation the same thing?

    • @ghostgate82
      @ghostgate82 Месяц назад

      @@Simply-FI_Show I “believe” the sun will rise tomorrow, but it isn’t a blind belief. All “belief” isn’t equal. Belief that isn’t filtered through Logic is a flawed belief, because Jesus Himself is Logic.

  • @glstka5710
    @glstka5710 Месяц назад +1

    The word 'hermeneutics' is what we use to mean a method of reading the Bible. If you use a different method you aren't 'not using hermeneutics' you are just using a different hermeneutic. The method used by the scholars i prefer did not come from the Greek religion described in this video. The term comes from this but that is just the way the English language describes the process. We use 'geometry' to do more than measure the earth.

    • @trooperman1080
      @trooperman1080 Месяц назад

      Exactly

    • @Simply-FI_Show
      @Simply-FI_Show  Месяц назад

      @@glstka5710 Good point! My question is this: Jesus asked Peter “who do you say I am?” Peter replied “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God”. Jesus replied “blessed are you … for flesh & blood did not reveal this to you, but my Father in heaven”.
      The spirit of God revealed truth to Peter. Jesus promised the Spirit of truth to come & lead us into ALL truth.
      When we consider hermeneutics, what role does the Holy Spirit play, when a clear “Thus saith the LORD” is overrided because a manmade method of interpretation is preferred?

    • @glstka5710
      @glstka5710 Месяц назад

      @@Simply-FI_Show The text actually says "My Father in heaven"not "The Spirit" revealed that to Peter. Jesus promised to the 12 at the last supper that the Holy Spirit would lead THEM into all truth. The Holy Spirit lead them into all truth. They put it into the Bible. Muslims make a similar misreading of that part to say that the "Paraclete" to come was Mohammed. We need to look for what the original author was trying to say in any writing.

    • @Simply-FI_Show
      @Simply-FI_Show  Месяц назад

      @@glstka5710 The Father revealed it to Peter. The Father is God. John 4:24 “God is a Spirit:“
      So I believe it is fitting to say The Spirit of God revealed it to Peter; in essence, it means the same thing, pointing to the Father.

    • @glstka5710
      @glstka5710 Месяц назад

      @@Simply-FI_Show The three persons are one in their deity so yes but there dose seem to be something going on with Peter's reply and the response of Jesus that could indicate that it was different from inner Spiritual revelation.

  • @orlandhoward9530
    @orlandhoward9530 Месяц назад +1

    They'll make all kinds of excuses to say the bible is not true. You have to assume that hermes has taken liberty to interpret apollo's message on his own and therefore misinterprets the message enhanced it down. Besides, they were not real gods in the first place.
    So you can have both sides all they want. Is this hermes believer not interpreting the relationship and quality of apollo and hermes , thereby misinterpreting the true communication?? Just a fencing name for bologna.
    Hamilton Ontario Canada

  • @connorohare229
    @connorohare229 Месяц назад +3

    No offense, but I'm not convinced by this argument. Stoicism started with pagan Greek philosophy but later on the Apostle Paul uses the terminology to describe the Gospel for his contemporary Greek audience.
    The first chapter of John references 'the Word' in which is known to the stoics as LOGOS. This again is a practical means of communication for Christ as 'the Word made flesh'
    Point is that your argument of throwing out hermeneutics throws out that practical ability to interpret God's Word.
    If people follow your method of 'read it as it is', you'll wind up multiplying many more subjective interpretations that are based off reading scripture out of context of the whole.
    But at the end, one way or another. I do have faith that God will help those who truly seek him, so if I am incorrect, I will gladly repent, because the truth comes before preferences indeed.

    • @ghostgate82
      @ghostgate82 Месяц назад +1

      What you said is spot on. These people get hung up on words and not on overall meaning and utility.

    • @Simply-FI_Show
      @Simply-FI_Show  Месяц назад +1

      @@connorohare229 Good point! My question is this: Jesus asked Peter “who do you say I am?” Peter replied “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God”. Jesus replied “blessed are you … for flesh & blood did not reveal this to you, but my Father in heaven”.
      The spirit of God revealed truth to Peter. Jesus promised the Spirit of truth to come & lead us into ALL truth.
      When we consider hermeneutics, what role does the Holy Spirit play, when a clear “Thus saith the LORD” is overrided because a manmade method of interpretation is preferred?

    • @connorohare229
      @connorohare229 Месяц назад

      @Simply-FI_Show The Spirit of Truth transcendents our individual perspectives and ignorance of God's Word itself.
      The very desire for consistency and seeking God is a fruit of the Spirit. I know you are animated by this as I am, too.
      We both seek the same God. We're just coming from different angles, I guess. As the Jew knew of the law and the Greek knew of reason, we are both drawn here by His will.
      Regarding hermeneutics, it's a practical tool to understand the full context of all scripture and how it relates to one another. If a person reads out of context "cut off your hand if it leads you to sin" you'd recognize he's a fool for not understanding basic hyperbole of Christ telling people to cut out things in life that lead a person to sin. There's so much history and clarity that gets missed because too many people read fragments out of context and become emotionally invested in them, I myself may unintentionally do it but I'm happy to be corrected and be closer to God then my myopic worldview

  • @trooperman1080
    @trooperman1080 Месяц назад +1

    The name just refers to all methods of interpretation of the Bible.....nothing to do with Greek gods

    • @Simply-FI_Show
      @Simply-FI_Show  Месяц назад

      @@trooperman1080 Good point! My question is this: Jesus asked Peter “who do you say I am?” Peter replied “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God”. Jesus replied “blessed are you … for flesh & blood did not reveal this to you, but my Father in heaven”.
      The spirit of God revealed truth to Peter. Jesus promised the Spirit of truth to come & lead us into ALL truth.
      When we consider hermeneutics, what role does the Holy Spirit play, when a clear “Thus saith the LORD” is overrided because a manmade method of interpretation is preferred?