I don’t think so. Crusader ships usually have names of Greek or Roman gods. Anvil has a history of naming their ships based on archaic or fantastical military designation so it makes sense
I think it depends on the redeemer wasn’t nerfed because it got a huge handling buff making it on par with smaller ship. The paladin doesn’t have drop ship capabilities to whereas the redeemer has 4 drop seats.
pure gunship. Not a cargo, nor dropship, nor anyhting else besides gunship... good interior, exterior And most important: the multicrew aspect is optional and empowers the experience for everyone (instead of being forced down our throats) About nerfs and buffs: always save some ccus to change for the next more powerful gunship - at least until the game exists in a balanced state And I think Paladin won't hit our hangars for at least 2 years
The Paladin looks like it was made as a companion to the Valkyrie. They should have left Paladin to Crusader Ind., and named this the Rook. This ship should not be hard to finish as they can reuse a lot of Valkyrie assets.
It looks cool, love the aestetics, paint is equally nice, its a ''Heavy gunship equipped to take down huge targets'', sounds interesting......i'll buy that, there we go, melt it tomorrow and forget about for 18months. Should get some wonderful rebalancing when i drops, we have ''Ship Armour/Ballistics/Maelstrom and advanced Radar/Scanning'', so no buying this ship on STATS wallabies, you buy a ship on its intended role, no need to cry about ''Nerfs'' just yet.
i can't decide, starlancer TAC or Paladin... but i already own a carrack and a redeemer. i get a loaner starlancer max for the tac wich is cool but i don't do cargo that much and i have better ships for that. knowing this what would you choose? Also, i will upgrade the TAC to the build version when available.
No matter how cool this ship seems none of it matters CIG can and will nerf it, like the Redeemer and the Corsair in order to sell new ships like this one.
Good video, I just can't pledge for a ship that isn't flyable with a month. I would rather wait until it actually comes out. For some reason I have a hammerhead in my asop I noticed for free today.
Looks nice, but I will never buy another concept until I can see it in person. Double never if CIG can't even say when they expect the ship to go live.
I feel like the name paladin should had been reserved for crusader ships.
I don’t think so. Crusader ships usually have names of Greek or Roman gods. Anvil has a history of naming their ships based on archaic or fantastical military designation so it makes sense
Idk yet man. My redeemer is still a staple for it's new mobility buff. Gotta wait and see.
Redeemer is the loaner. Getting to test it now
I think it depends on the redeemer wasn’t nerfed because it got a huge handling buff making it on par with smaller ship. The paladin doesn’t have drop ship capabilities to whereas the redeemer has 4 drop seats.
pure gunship. Not a cargo, nor dropship, nor anyhting else besides gunship... good interior, exterior
And most important: the multicrew aspect is optional and empowers the experience for everyone (instead of being forced down our throats)
About nerfs and buffs: always save some ccus to change for the next more powerful gunship - at least until the game exists in a balanced state
And I think Paladin won't hit our hangars for at least 2 years
If it flys anything like the Valkyrie, the redeemer has no worries.
they should make that gap able to hold a vehicle in between to drop it on the planet like a Rover with its crew
The Paladin looks like it was made as a companion to the Valkyrie. They should have left Paladin to Crusader Ind., and named this the Rook. This ship should not be hard to finish as they can reuse a lot of Valkyrie assets.
It's very nice until you remember the hammerhead exists.
fun fact: it's cheaper than the redeemer.
It looks cool, love the aestetics, paint is equally nice, its a ''Heavy gunship equipped to take down huge targets'', sounds interesting......i'll buy that, there we go, melt it tomorrow and forget about for 18months. Should get some wonderful rebalancing when i drops, we have ''Ship Armour/Ballistics/Maelstrom and advanced Radar/Scanning'', so no buying this ship on STATS wallabies, you buy a ship on its intended role, no need to cry about ''Nerfs'' just yet.
What is the point of the HH now? Its requires too much crew and its not maneuverable at all.
i can't decide, starlancer TAC or Paladin... but i already own a carrack and a redeemer. i get a loaner starlancer max for the tac wich is cool but i don't do cargo that much and i have better ships for that. knowing this what would you choose? Also, i will upgrade the TAC to the build version when available.
No matter how cool this ship seems none of it matters CIG can and will nerf it, like the Redeemer and the Corsair in order to sell new ships like this one.
I am still to decide because lack of cargo space
What do you think three years till it’s in?
Around 2 I think but everything is possible.
@ let’s go ahead and push that timeline to today Jr. lol
@ let me sing you a song… I want what I want and I want it now. Ta ta ta day jr.
@@infinitespace239 I really liked your videos, man
Good video, I just can't pledge for a ship that isn't flyable with a month. I would rather wait until it actually comes out. For some reason I have a hammerhead in my asop I noticed for free today.
Can’t buy this.
1. Not flyable.
2. CIG will nerf this on after it sells.
Do you dress yourself?, or does your mum still perform honorific?
Looks nice, but I will never buy another concept until I can see it in person. Double never if CIG can't even say when they expect the ship to go live.