What Was The Universe Like Immediately After The Big Bang?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024

Комментарии • 1,1 тыс.

  • @HistoryoftheUniverse
    @HistoryoftheUniverse  3 года назад +437

    Hello folks! Hope you enjoy it. This one is pretty wild. In two weeks we shall be exploring...how time began. So stick around, just getting started. Hopefully shall also melt your minds. Like, subscribe and leave a comment. Thanks!

    • @kidmohair8151
      @kidmohair8151 3 года назад +12

      thanks for provoking the random particles in my brain into a thought stew

    • @EvertGroot
      @EvertGroot 3 года назад +6

      The sound design is beautiful

    • @ashroskell
      @ashroskell 3 года назад +8

      Where have you been all my life?! Beautifully explained, sublime music, underneath a musical voice (is that a Welsh lilt?), all wrapped around thought torturing ideas like a sugary centre of a confectionary of science! Truly delighted to have discovered this channel on this lazy Sunday afternoon . . . What a treat! ✌️👍

    • @moodyrick8503
      @moodyrick8503 3 года назад +9

      Mixing the science & history together takes it to the next level.
      Very professional.
      And of course thanks for making it digestible, as most of us are not physicist's.

    • @jgreen2015
      @jgreen2015 3 года назад +5

      At around the 2 minute mark you say "an hour is just an arbitrary unit of time"
      Ive heard other science youtubers say similar things. That whilst mass and length have standard measurements now, and smallest possible units, based in physics time does not.
      But surely...
      If the plank length is the smallest possible division of space
      And the speed of light is the fastest anything can travel through space
      Then time can be measured and given a smallest unit in terms of physics.
      The time it takes light to travel 1 plank length in a vacuum.
      Nothing can travel faster..so no possible shorter time there.
      And nothing can move a lesser amount. You can move half a plank length. So no shorter time available there
      So then an hour could be defined in terms of those units.
      The time it takes light to travel x plank lengths in a vacuum

  • @astroandrius
    @astroandrius 3 года назад +730

    This channel and History of the Earth is honestly better and more interesting than documentaries on paid services. Keep up the great work!!!

    • @varjagen4160
      @varjagen4160 3 года назад +4

      You read my mind

    • @charlesbenca5357
      @charlesbenca5357 3 года назад +7

      Real science and Real engineering are good too

    • @ShaheenGhiassy
      @ShaheenGhiassy 3 года назад +1

      Suurusly great stuff

    • @mileslong3904
      @mileslong3904 3 года назад +11

      TV is garbage.

    • @Krystalmyth
      @Krystalmyth 3 года назад +2

      @@fw_gamer2777 They're alright, the media used here is exponentially better for the brain I think.

  • @sunkruhmhalaci2592
    @sunkruhmhalaci2592 3 года назад +318

    None of the information in this was new to me, yet it was so well written and produced that I watched it all anyway and am still pleased. You didn't hype anything, you didn't oversimplify things to the point of stupidity nor go so deep that it would lose most audiences. Honestly, well done.

  • @noeldenever
    @noeldenever 3 года назад +122

    The more advanced our research goes, the more we realize how small our hard-earned knowledge is. This exploration of our origins is an endeavour with no end point in sight. I'm just going to enjoy the journey with the scientific community for as long as my short life allows.
    Thank you, for another episode which is a gem to the eyes, ears, and mind. You guys always put professionally produced documentaries to shame.

  • @clasbin77
    @clasbin77 3 года назад +49

    Every time I reach the end and see that "Written by Leila Battison" line my mind melts indeed. For there is undeniable beauty in the clarity of the exposition, rythm in the preposition starting sentences, intensity in the moments of personal revelation scientists had in pursuit of abstract thought.
    I like Matt O'Dowd dynamic and informal delivery, Sabine Hossenfelder's sharp no nonsense style and this pieces reach a height of litterary perfection to complement them.

  • @paulmichaelfreedman8334
    @paulmichaelfreedman8334 2 года назад +53

    Beautiful narration. The tempo is absolutely spot on.
    I've sampled many, many scientific channels, but 90% have narration that rattle on and on and on at a high pace, which I find very hard to follow and eventually starts hammering onto my skull. But I subscribed to this channel within a few minutes.
    I hope you make many many more documentaries like these.

    • @billrodgers5532
      @billrodgers5532 Год назад +1

      My thoughts entirely. I too tire of the Verbal bombardment whereby the narration sounds like one long sentence.

  • @jordanwright5795
    @jordanwright5795 2 года назад +45

    I wish this series was required viewing in high school physics classes. So much of how physics is taught is geared only towards the rote memorization needed to pass exams not on understanding the context, framework and humbling beauty of our universe.
    It seems to me much easier to memorize the details when you have the context of a story to hang those details on.
    This series is pure poetry.

    • @craigfowler7098
      @craigfowler7098 Год назад +2

      Yep the beauty and humbleness make it human and thus interesting.

  • @gonzalo-ortiz
    @gonzalo-ortiz 3 года назад +49

    Cheerios to Leila Battinson for the script! That intro was really poetic, love it. David Kelly, man! you make sound epic that so many others would just read, thanks!

  • @Zymru
    @Zymru 3 года назад +30

    cant believe i found this channel just by chance! hope your channel blows up in popularity soon, this is some of the best explained science content ive seen on YT

  • @frankowalker4662
    @frankowalker4662 3 года назад +883

    This series is written, narrated and produced with total professionalism. It should also be shown in schools.

    • @argent1631
      @argent1631 3 года назад +6

      so true

    • @kurtisgonzales37
      @kurtisgonzales37 3 года назад +13

      Please don't do it the disservice of being put in schools... lol. Maybe everywhere but America....

    • @richardavery2894
      @richardavery2894 3 года назад +10

      Yes i agree. How do we blow this channel up???

    • @xploration1437
      @xploration1437 3 года назад +8

      @@kurtisgonzales37 Why?

    • @rjlchristie
      @rjlchristie 3 года назад +5

      I don't agree, not on the narration side anyway. Kelly has a terrible sense of rhythm when reading. He constantly puts pauses in unnatural parts of the sentences.

  • @sdgibo
    @sdgibo 3 года назад +73

    Thanks for producing the quality content that even most 'educational' TV channels have long discarded.

  • @seraphinasowerby9453
    @seraphinasowerby9453 3 года назад +31

    The level of quality and passion put into this vid blows my mind almost as much as the content of said vid. I hope more people find this channel, you defs deserve the subs and views

    • @ASH12B
      @ASH12B 2 года назад

      Hope you learn how to spell someday.

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 года назад

      @@ASH12B what was spelled wrong?

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 года назад

      @@ASH12B defs is the only problem I can see but people use it as a shorthand version of definitely

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 года назад

      @@ASH12B Vid and subs are shortened as well. So what is spelled wrong? What?

    • @garyk1334
      @garyk1334 2 года назад

      @@ASH12B 15B years & then you appeared , really ? Must be some sort of cosmic joke

  • @dror2519
    @dror2519 3 года назад +77

    Surprising this channel isn't bigger already, i really appreciate the work.

    • @andrefarfan4372
      @andrefarfan4372 3 года назад

      Black holes

    • @shinydarkzeus
      @shinydarkzeus 3 года назад

      Calm down it only has 2 videos and 1 was released a few hours ago

    • @iaw7406
      @iaw7406 3 года назад +1

      It will blow up

    • @sasapavlovic1454
      @sasapavlovic1454 3 года назад +1

      Its just new im sure it will grow really fast. Btw the voice is fantastic along the great storytelling

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 года назад

      @@shinydarkzeus 6 months later...I'm not calm lol

  • @WilliamDye-willdye
    @WilliamDye-willdye 3 года назад +26

    Well researched, well produced. Bravo!
    I may well represent too small of an audience to justify targeting, but if you want details about one audience member, here ya go. I'm not learning much anymore from "science for the public" material, but I'm not yet able to comprehend research papers -- not in theoretical physics anyway. Therefore my interest is in material that is, as I like to phrase it, "above my head but not out of reach". I want material that helps me finally read the research papers myself (or at least modern renditions of older papers which use updated graphics and naming). It's tough to survive in your field, so I don't mind if you target a larger audience instead.

  • @Lillyyyy433
    @Lillyyyy433 3 года назад +10

    Seriously awesome video series. You brought up one of my favorite ideas of all time: light acting as both a wave and as a particle.. so strange and wonderful

  • @force1535
    @force1535 3 года назад +27

    Such quality is unparalleled

  • @philoujs
    @philoujs 3 года назад +45

    This channel deserves more visibility

  • @nicolasdelatorre7382
    @nicolasdelatorre7382 2 года назад +19

    Can we all agree that the imperial measurement system HAS TO GO?

    • @justinbarion2269
      @justinbarion2269 7 месяцев назад +1

      It's already gone in most places

    • @judewarner1536
      @judewarner1536 24 дня назад

      The metric system is the embodiment of scientific notation. Where corporate meets science, such as NASA, the units are always going to be metric. The units are invariably shown on the "paperwork"... no excuse.
      Having said that, the Imperial System has the advantage that to the ordinary person, it is in understandable human-sized units. Prior to the 20th century, merchants had to deal with trades that were not only in different units, but a unit of the same name could have a different size in a different geographical location. Standardisation and technology have simplified things but also led to a degree of laziness in daily thought. There are now people operating checkouts in stores who cannot make change if it's not displayed on a monitor and who cannot add loose change in a combination of coins for payment.

    • @ryandevries8931
      @ryandevries8931 16 дней назад

      Which Empire?
      U.S. or U.K.

  • @boryshacker
    @boryshacker 3 года назад +8

    i was so mesmerized by the perfect introduction to the topic! slow, consistent and guided.just wow!

  • @Laura-S196
    @Laura-S196 3 года назад +16

    This channel and History Of The Earth are some of the only best channels on RUclips

  • @syntactyx
    @syntactyx 3 года назад +6

    Liked and subbed. This was such an ambitious undertaking and an incredible debut on RUclips. My recommendation would have been to explore in greater depth the role of cosmic background radiation in reifying the veracity of a hot, compact early universe, rather than just seeking to tackle the currently unknown (and possibly unknowable) nature of the planck epoch. Additionally, from what we know from the cosmic background radiation, the key to understanding the universe before the recombination era and all the way down to the planck epoch could lie in the cosmic neutrino background - something predicted to exist, but so faint and low energy it is almost impossible to detect. Perhaps these important ideas could be covered in the next video. Thanks for this. Brilliant work.

  • @WildStar2002
    @WildStar2002 Год назад +4

    Your content is *SO GOOD!* Love it - thank you so much for your research and the careful crafting of these fascinating and informative documentaries!

  • @KateeAngel
    @KateeAngel 3 года назад +134

    Intro: how using Imperial units can create serious problems lol

    • @jacqueline-chantallestefan1940
      @jacqueline-chantallestefan1940 3 года назад +9

      Imagine if it wasnt a probe but a manned spaceship…

    • @BlackSakura33
      @BlackSakura33 3 года назад +12

      It was an example of arrogance and baseless superiority of a certain country. The scenario haven't changed much even now. Scientists are a bit more cautious maybe.

    • @afx935
      @afx935 3 года назад +1

      @@BlackSakura33 Damn France and their metricification.

    • @afx935
      @afx935 3 года назад

      U.S. Customary. :)

    • @sinisterjuggalo4364
      @sinisterjuggalo4364 3 года назад +15

      It is quite clearly explained that it wouldn't have mattered what system of measurement was used, so long as everyone involved agreed to use said standard.

  • @elietcetera9686
    @elietcetera9686 3 года назад +10

    Keep doing what you're doing! These channels will have millions of subscribers in no time.

  • @donquixote1950
    @donquixote1950 3 года назад +4

    One of the BEST channels on You Tube! I can almost wrap my brain around the subject matter. For brief instants, thanks to YOU, I think I sort of kind of “get it.”

  • @NewDealChief
    @NewDealChief 7 месяцев назад +4

    The intro just proves how metric is the superior measurement system.

  • @FloozieOne
    @FloozieOne Год назад +3

    Thank you so much for giving a definition of the Planck constant. I have heard of it mentioned in many documentaries but never understood what it was. Now that I do I can finally create a picture/constant in my mind as to what was going on in that tiny amount of space and time.

  • @VigiHunter
    @VigiHunter Год назад +4

    I had alway intrest in all these questions scientist asked themselves for centurys. Most of the stuff in this video I already heard or read but listining to you eyplaining it in this structured manner had me finally grasp a bit of what reality is actually about. Especially the part where you explained that light isn't just a continuous stream but rather comes in QUANTIFIED packets. With these words something just clicked, thank you for maing this knowledge free for the rest of the world! :)

    • @bsadewitz
      @bsadewitz Год назад +2

      FYI, it's "quantized". Not trying to be annoying; just figured you'd want to know.
      It is really bizarre, isn't it? I mean, where else in nature does anything come in discrete, uniform packets?

  • @charliepie1212
    @charliepie1212 3 года назад +12

    Okay, so, about an hour into the history of the universe, and we are... 1 Planck time in. Guess I'll go make some popcorn.

    • @robinchesterfield42
      @robinchesterfield42 3 года назад +2

      Yeah I used to think that one episode of "How the Universe Works" called "The First Second" was an insanely zoomed in, concentrated subject.
      HA HA HA HA HA HA HA can I have some popcorn too? :)
      (although actually I did like that episode, to be fair.)

  • @charlesmiller000
    @charlesmiller000 Год назад +1

    This channel, "History of the Universe" should receive the equivalent of the Nobel Prize!
    It's so perfect in every way!

  • @Hisu0
    @Hisu0 3 года назад +5

    Somehow, when touching the subject of the observer effect, science communicators NEVER address what does it actually mean to detect a photon, that on this scale, there is no such thing as passive observation, so you literally have no other way to detect something other than have something else interact with it in some way, which IMO is a serious oversight, as people hearing that, but having no experience in physics, imagine the future of the object being changed by looking at it. Then, it gets developed into various "paradoxes", like wave-particle duality, when in actuality, there is no such paradox: the photon is simply what becomes of an EM wave when it interacts with something, and us looking at it has nothing to do with it.

  • @hellofranky99
    @hellofranky99 3 года назад +3

    The production value on this channel is amazing. All other RUclips cosmology/physics/science channels should take notice.

  • @sasapavlovic1454
    @sasapavlovic1454 3 года назад +3

    Oh my god i could've waited for your 2nd video to come out on this channel...Excelent work on history of the earth and since i love astronomy i know you'll do just as good on this subject as well.
    Great staff ! Keep up the good work.

  • @Ender7j
    @Ender7j 3 года назад +7

    Would you consider doing a video(s) about the development of Relativity and the technologies it enabled and then explain what technology a Theory of Everything might enable us to develop?

  • @stimpy_thecat
    @stimpy_thecat 3 года назад +35

    Back in my day, there were only planets, stars and galaxies, and we LIKED it! Now get off my lawn!!! *shakes cane*

  • @Rafaga777
    @Rafaga777 3 года назад +4

    Great channel and video. What a superb quality! Thanks a lot for this video. Please keep on the good work...

  • @AriadyPutra
    @AriadyPutra 3 года назад +3

    Since space and time behave differently at big bang, I imagine Planck era might feel like forever if one could aware in such condition. Mindblowing 🤯 we could be in Planck era right now to the next universe.
    Please be gentle, it was just me babbling. I have no physics background, just fascinated by the topic.

    • @robinchesterfield42
      @robinchesterfield42 3 года назад +2

      Oh no, that's not a dumb idea. Aliens who experience time VERY differently from us are a cool concept and fun, if difficult, to write. Like the neutron-star dwelling (!) people from "Dragon's Egg" who experience their whole lives in less than a second, or the program people from "Tron", whose lives and perceptions work at computer-processing speed. :)

  • @LucAnderssen
    @LucAnderssen 3 года назад +2

    Automatic subscribed!
    Such a refreshing breath of beauty and enlighment here.
    ❣️🚀🔭🛰️🪐❣️

  • @MrHeliMan
    @MrHeliMan 3 года назад +3

    It was a very interesting video and all in it well explained even for someone like me, only with knowledge gathered from other such RUclips videos.
    Love it. One of the best I've seen so far and I believe it deserves a bit more recognition...

  • @GameTimeWhy
    @GameTimeWhy 3 года назад +2

    This is really well done. I was surprised how few subs you have until I saw you only started up in January.

  • @maxxd.8687
    @maxxd.8687 3 года назад +9

    Contemplating the possibilities of quantum gravity blows my mind. Having such great and well-presented instructional videos is a marvel to behold. Thank you

  • @knightvr_112
    @knightvr_112 3 года назад +1

    Binged the entire series at bedtime a few months ago. Rewatched the Big Bang video again and am now subbed and watching series at a more awake hour and loving every minute. Beautiful work whoever you are.

  • @rickybojangles162
    @rickybojangles162 3 года назад +9

    Yes yes yes, been waiting for this!

  • @JohnVance
    @JohnVance 2 года назад +1

    Hey man this is a really great channel you’ve got here. 100x better than most commercial content.

  • @CatChrist
    @CatChrist 3 года назад +12

    Commenting to help boost visibility 💜

  • @fatherofkayos
    @fatherofkayos 3 года назад +5

    If you and this wonderful resource had existed when I was in school, I'm certain that my career would have taken a different path. No regrets, just observation. Thanks for helping to ensure the betterment of humankind.

  • @toxic3n3rgy
    @toxic3n3rgy 3 года назад +11

    Phenomenal work.

  • @metameta1427
    @metameta1427 3 года назад +2

    I love this new channel. I loved the other one dealing with voices from the past. But this shi.. here, this is my jam. Keep up the good work and cant wait for a new upload.

  • @Greguk444
    @Greguk444 3 года назад +7

    Thank you. Very interesting and well explained

  • @syntactyx
    @syntactyx 3 года назад +27

    Don't let the salty creationists in this comment section undermine the absolute gem that is this channel. Brilliant work of amazing quality. Absolutely would've thought this to be a professionally made documentary or commissioned educational film. Fantastic!

  • @bread8176
    @bread8176 3 года назад +10

    Phenomanly narrated!

  • @MattttG3
    @MattttG3 Месяц назад

    *came back to your start just now to hear the progress of your journey and it is marvelous how far you have already come*
    I recommend this channel to sooooooo many people and strangers online, quite literally I tell them to come here to this channel to get the knowledge that is present for all willing to hear

  • @garykeenan8591
    @garykeenan8591 3 года назад +3

    Superb, as usual. Great writing and production values. Thanks.

  • @regular-joe
    @regular-joe 3 года назад +2

    Learned more in even just the intro than in most full videos. Phenomenal stuff.

  • @brainsXforXshit
    @brainsXforXshit 3 года назад +143

    Algorithm needs to bless this man, everyone needs to thumbs up, comment and subscribe.

    • @Splaccemttv
      @Splaccemttv 3 года назад

      Exactly wat these channels r made for ive seen at least 3 channels like these all made in about the same period of time in my brain these channels r cash grabs, but hey the contents great at least

    • @chronic_cynic
      @chronic_cynic 3 года назад +1

      If the content is great, not sure what your objection is. Considering it's provided free to you. No one creates content to entertain or educate you. That's just a side efect. Their main purpose is to benefit from their work in some way. And I for one hope they succeed!

    • @ce5243
      @ce5243 3 года назад

      Yes

    • @Krystalmyth
      @Krystalmyth 3 года назад

      It's funny, 88k views, only 3.2k likes. It's such a valuable thing, we really shouldn't forget to do it.

    • @Krystalmyth
      @Krystalmyth 3 года назад

      @@Splaccemttv Love, you shortened a three letter word to one - twice, because it's too long for you to be bothered with. I would be hesitant to trust my own brain if I wrote like this.

  • @andrefarfan4372
    @andrefarfan4372 3 года назад +6

    Great job video thanks

  • @tommasotiberi5666
    @tommasotiberi5666 Год назад +1

    Your videos are an awesome background to have while I paint my house

  • @guiraudarthur7840
    @guiraudarthur7840 3 года назад +4

    I just got the privilege to enjoy a well thought, and well informed video, excellent job to all!

  • @jarosawzawadzki1801
    @jarosawzawadzki1801 3 года назад +2

    Great content! It is a real pleasure to watch. Keep up great work. Looking for more videos.

  • @stephen_dmg2003
    @stephen_dmg2003 3 года назад

    i am so happy that so many british and australian people narrate videos like this it helps me feel so much calmer

  • @jonnywalker-74
    @jonnywalker-74 3 года назад +3

    These videos are like meditating, it calm my mind and help me relax. Thanks!

  • @caseyhildinger4432
    @caseyhildinger4432 2 года назад +1

    That rug at 21:56 really tied the video together.

    • @Jump-n-smash
      @Jump-n-smash 2 года назад

      You are out of your element, Casey.

  • @mrJety89
    @mrJety89 3 года назад +4

    So.. it's just like how a Futon can be both a sofa, and a bed at the same time

  • @janosm5252
    @janosm5252 Год назад

    This channel is one of the best. Extremely detailed information about the latest findings of science. No nonsense, the presentation flows flawlessly!

  • @kevindepauw9110
    @kevindepauw9110 3 года назад +3

    I enjoyed every episode this channel has produced. A subject in science thrust into the role of the protagonist in the form of an epic story beautifully narrated. Then I saw the count of subscribers. That's too low for the quality delivered.

  • @Fregmazors
    @Fregmazors 3 года назад +1

    This is my favorite one yet. I listened to the last few minutes multiple times. It works so well, because it is set up by all that comes before it. Well done.

  • @srki1524
    @srki1524 3 года назад +1

    35sec in, Subscribed!!! What an amazing production/content. Keep up the good work!

  • @LMarti13
    @LMarti13 3 года назад +3

    ok this channel deserves WAY more views

  • @iang3728
    @iang3728 Год назад

    I'm so thankful for this channel and others like it. As someone THIRSTY for good science, but not within academia, this stuff is a mind saver.

  • @kloakovalimonada
    @kloakovalimonada 3 года назад +5

    This is incredible. The writer has a rare gift of clarity.

  • @comradehellfire2095
    @comradehellfire2095 2 года назад +2

    It’s amazing how we’re now gaining understanding of things we can barely even observe now… Very fascinating

  • @KenLikeEh123
    @KenLikeEh123 3 года назад +3

    Absolutely top class videos. Amazing. A very interesting history lesson indeed

  • @briankleinschmidt3664
    @briankleinschmidt3664 3 года назад +1

    My math teacher marked answers wrong that did not have units. You see, the numbers alone are meaningless, as are the units alone. But they, together, have mass.

  • @nestor144
    @nestor144 3 года назад +6

    Good work 👍

  • @joeault9662
    @joeault9662 5 месяцев назад

    The feel and tone of the videos on this channel are the best on RUclips. It reminds me of prime PBS!

  • @mezmerizer9422
    @mezmerizer9422 3 года назад +1

    >vacuum filled
    How do you fill something with nothing?

  • @dlee645
    @dlee645 3 года назад +7

    Excellent.

  • @the_catstronaut7037
    @the_catstronaut7037 Год назад

    Love the channel. Quickly has become the videos I watch while cooking and eating. Great work

  • @troyarthur376
    @troyarthur376 3 года назад +4

    This channel and the History are Earth are the best documentary series I've seen in years. Keep it up guys!

  • @taylorschwarz241
    @taylorschwarz241 3 года назад +1

    How does this channel have less than a million followers? Top notch quality, deserves a larger viewer platform. Awesome content.

  • @brandenjames2408
    @brandenjames2408 3 года назад +23

    A great video, but I'm disappointed that this video continues the misconception that quantum computers are a "next generation" of computers and a move away from shrinking components, making it seem as if they are universally better than traditional computers. The reality is that quantum computers are only better at specific types of problems, and hardware research is certainly still attempting to shrink the components of traditional computers by attempting to use alternatives to silicon that can avoid quantum effects at smaller scales.

    • @faulkgough1768
      @faulkgough1768 3 года назад +1

      okay, well, I'm by no means a computer guy, but; and know, I'm by no means trying to say your opinion isn't valid; but, I think, from what I've heard is that quantum computers do it different...
      like.. sure, we will make smaller and faster um... silicon? ones, but, they, with our current knowledge... are limited to a set way of running.
      ours run on 2.. (okay.. 0 and 1... ) but like.. I guess they said quantum is like 4 or some shit...
      again, I dont know... but... this isn't petty hrrrrrr car run on lightning over car run on bio mass..
      this is... we know numbers... and this is them... 123456 vs... oh heck... there are like... numbers outside of the cardinals?
      While.. yes, I am weary of quantum computers.. you can bet that they will bet the shit out of our current rigs...

    • @brandenjames2408
      @brandenjames2408 3 года назад +5

      @@faulkgough1768 i understand where someone not versed in algorithms would think this, but unfortunately it's not like that. Traditional computers approximate what we call a turing machine. We have proven that some problems on such a machine can be done in what is called polynomial time, meaning the runtime scales linearly with the size of the data (these problems are called class P). We believe (but haven't actually proven yet for all of them) that there are others that can't be done in polynomial time on such a machine. There are many classes of these but the one we care about here is NP. These are infeasible to run on traditional computers over a certain data size.
      Quantum computers approximate a non-deterinistic multi-track turing machine. For P problems, we have proven it is no better than a traditional computer. However, for a subset of NP problems (called BQP), we believe (but again haven't proven) that quantum computers can run these in polynomial time while traditional computers can't. This is where they are useful and needed.

    • @brandenjames2408
      @brandenjames2408 3 года назад +1

      @@rosettahaze The reply is not solely directed at him. Also I realize it's not entirely understandable on a first read by someone not familiar with the terms, but there is only so much space in a comment and it was already overly long, so I just made sure to get the necessary terms in there for him to research further if he cares to.

    • @kingwillie206
      @kingwillie206 2 года назад +2

      Have you considered what a hybrid computer would be capable of?

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 года назад +1

      @@kingwillie206 not until now...🤯

  • @fademusic1980
    @fademusic1980 3 года назад +2

    ASMR level voice, excellent content, competent delivery of the subject matter. See you at 1m subs in a year or two.

  • @stevemonkey6666
    @stevemonkey6666 3 года назад +5

    You misspelled "Planck" in the thumbnail.

    • @HistoryoftheUniverse
      @HistoryoftheUniverse  3 года назад +3

      You are a lifesaver. I once misspelled "Independendence" over on Voices of the Past for an entire day. Well done me.

    • @loki6626
      @loki6626 3 года назад +2

      @@HistoryoftheUniverse
      I think you mean misspelt.
      Only kidding 🤣

  • @kenchesnut4425
    @kenchesnut4425 3 года назад +1

    The Channels that y'all produce are the BEST ON THE WEB...Accurate...Consice .CORRECT.......JUST A SUPER JOB..MUCH LUV FROM N.AUGUSTA S.C

  • @MikeIce4SG
    @MikeIce4SG 3 года назад +6

    Thank god the algorithm. Im enjoying this more than my old science class

    • @alewis17
      @alewis17 3 года назад

      Yeah I was looking for more channels like what if, riddle, aperture, etc Lol

  • @steviekngstn
    @steviekngstn Год назад +1

    LOVE this series, my favorite narrator too..

  • @renuduner2
    @renuduner2 3 года назад +6

    ȧ̴̵̶̲̞̯̞̩͇̼̩̣̱̤̘̖̯͎͙ͯͫ̅ͣ̒̈̑̀͆̐͐̎͜͡ḽ̛̜̘͎̦͓͖͙͕̜ͩͬͧ͆͗̔͐͋̑̇̈́ͤ͊̐̍̆ͬ̆͝͠ͅg̷̟̙͚̫͍̩̬̩̯̗͕̙̲̫̀ͥ̾́̈́̈́̊ͧ͊̐̈ͣ́ͥ͐ͬ̚ͅǒ̙̭̹̻̻͇͈͉͔͉̹̩̱͓̭̲͂ͤ̔͒̿̐̿̆̈̈̍͑̾ͦ͘͟ṙ̵̮̱͙̠̙͈̭̩̳̲̮̪̫̜̝̘͑͗̎͊ͭ̽̄i̧̛͌͆ͤ̈́ͤ̉̓͏͕̥̤̫͙͖̜̜̞̫̯̺̼̫̝͈̳̜́ͅt̷͎̜̖̹͕̩͔́̋̎̉ͧ͂ͭͧͮ͛̑ͪͤ̏͐̿͟h̡̛͂ͨ̍̔͗ͬ̑̋ͫ̚͏̢̬͚͚̦͇̝̝̹͚͖m̵̡͇͕͈̞̭͈͎̳̙̪͓͈̼̾̈͊̋̔̃ͤ̅͗ͩ̉͑̊͜ͅ ̡̛̞̩̣͖͔̻̭͕̙̬̲̦̫̜̺̐ͫ̿͌ͯͦ̇ͮ́̈́͂ͭ̇͂̌́ͅb̴̜͙̝̟̘͍̙̙̂͛̍͐͟͡l̜̜̲̺ͪ̌̍͊̈ͧ͘͜͞͠ẹ̢̫̜̘̟͔̬̲̬̞͖͕͔̝͉̞̯̔͆̀̕̕͝ś̶̴͍̰̜̩̖̱̜͇̦͉͔́̇͊̂̎ͯ̋̆͊̚s̼̮̖̰͓̦̮̪̬̲̜̹͒̽̿ͫ̈̎̂̀̕͟ͅͅ ̸̸̨̱͍̭͚̬̻͖̙̖͈̭͔̱̳͈̈́́ͥ̏̀t̴̷̛̗̗̜̽ͨͮ̃ͭͪ̋͑̆ͦ͢͞ẖ͕̱̘̮̩͉̹͍̜̯̩͖̺̙̄̈̋ͮ͋͋͂̑ͯͮͦͯ̚͘͟͞ͅẻ̛̪̥͉̞̈́͑̿ͬ́ͧͯͦ̀ͬ̾̌ͮ͑͡͡͡ͅṃ̷̴̨̬͈̩̗̻͚̩̗̰̺͚̺ͣ̉ͥ̉̌̿͒ͥͨ́ͭ̃͐ͬ̇ͪ̈́͟ͅ

  • @joz6683
    @joz6683 2 года назад

    I cannot recommend this channel highly enough. The narration, subjects and pacing are almost perfect.

  • @ColleenJousma
    @ColleenJousma 2 года назад +6

    I used to be very religious. I had an awe for "creation" then. But my awe for the universe has jumped exponentially since leaving faith in a god. What an amazing universe we live in.

    • @Arsenic71
      @Arsenic71 2 года назад +1

      It opens so many doors, so many possibilities. And it's perfectly fine to say "We don't know (yet)" - it's better than relying on the notion of a creator for which there is absolutely zero evidence. Faith:= Belief without evidence.

    • @mattschroeder6081
      @mattschroeder6081 Год назад +2

      It's possible to have faith in God while also having awe for the universe. Both faith and science will always leave humans with questions that can never be answered.

    • @beaconeersofthesevenmaps3467
      @beaconeersofthesevenmaps3467 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@mattschroeder6081which one of the thousands gods INVENTED throughout history?
      Religious faith is just a primitive superstition.

  • @zacharyanderson3791
    @zacharyanderson3791 3 года назад +2

    The hell kinda contractors who make spacecraft parts doesn’t assume metric when doing anything science related?

  • @davidwilliams2722
    @davidwilliams2722 Год назад

    I just discovered your series. Wonderful. Please do more if you can. Maybe an ongoing history of astronomy/cosmology. I love it.

  • @MrFreeGman
    @MrFreeGman 3 года назад +3

    So much time and effort trying to understand the first measurable moment of the universe, but I think an infinitely more important question is what happened before that first moment. What caused that energy to exist in the first place? Why are the laws of physics what they are?

  • @omsingharjit
    @omsingharjit 3 года назад

    10:00 but first you said the idea of plank distance and , time was tool to think big bang mean nothing can be smaller then plank length so how singularity will be dimension less ?

  • @duality4y
    @duality4y 3 года назад +3

    first few minutes already are priceless I don't know how i found this little gem of a video :)

  • @jonnysupreme
    @jonnysupreme 3 года назад +1

    SUBBED
    I don't say this often enough unfortunately but this channel is the mutts nutts mate!!
    Top top channel!

  • @triberium_
    @triberium_ 3 года назад +3

    Imagine all those Einsteins we haven't been able to give an opportunity to

  • @meteor09
    @meteor09 3 года назад +2

    As many have said. The History of the Universe/Earth docs are the best out there. A history of math would be very cool.

    • @robinchesterfield42
      @robinchesterfield42 3 года назад +2

      It would confuse the crap out of me since I stink at math, but if it was done by THESE people, I'd still watch. :)

    • @finnbarrryan2278
      @finnbarrryan2278 2 года назад +1

      The history of mathematics... Check in RUclips, some are really understandable even for non-mathematicians.

  • @loki6626
    @loki6626 3 года назад +4

    Cosmic ✌😀👍

  • @derp4428
    @derp4428 3 года назад +1

    Fantastic! Looking forward to upcoming videos

  • @Kwauhn.
    @Kwauhn. 3 года назад +3

    This video is great at telling a story, and not so great at explaining the makeup of the story. I get that general relativity and quantum mechanics are irreconcilable, but a less wishy-washy explanation would help flesh out the depth of the problems faced by modern physicists. I've always loved documentaries like this; these kinds of shows are what got me into physics in the first place. However, I feel like this video is just a rehash of older PBS documentaries aimed at a very broad audience. It makes use of some pop science tropes that do little to expand on topics that demand a more in depth look. I understand that further explanation may be beyond the scope of this one video, and that regardless, some other viewers may still have been exposed to new ideas in watching it. I myself though, felt like the video title was never answered, and like I walked away with no new information or fresh perspective.
    I hope this doesn't come across as too harsh, because the format is excellent, and I feel like there is a lot of potential here. I just wish I could've heard more about the specific problems encountered by people specifically tackling the mysteries of the planck epoch. I recommend the people working on this show take note of the content covered by channels like ScienceClic, Astrum, PBS SpaceTime, Domain of Science, and Veritasium. I feel like those are all channels that stand out by attempting to approach old topics in new ways. They all do a good job of removing the veneer of pop-sci tropes/phrases and replacing them with well thought out and accessible explanations paired with well designed visuals.
    I hope my feedback helps this channel find its footing, good luck in the future!

    • @ikilledaman
      @ikilledaman 2 года назад +1

      Exactly. You got it spot on.