Dropping G-Shocks From A Helicopter - How Much Shock Can They Take? (Tested From 10 to 100 Meters)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 авг 2022
  • Shop G-Shock On TeddyBaldassarre.com: teddybaldassarre.com/collecti...
    Purchase The G-Shock DW5600BB: teddybaldassarre.com/collecti...
    Check Out Our Ultimate Guide To The Best G-Shock Models: teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/wa...
    Shop Watches: teddybaldassarre.com/
    Written Content: www.teddybaldassarre.com/blog
    The Casio G-Shock, released back in 1983, was designed to be able to withstand a fall from 10 meters (33 feet). In this video, we decided to put that theory to the test the best way we could think of, with a helicopter. Of course, we don't stop there, testing the G-Shock at different heights all the way up to 100 meters. What do you guys think of this style of content? What other types of extreme watch tests would you like to see?
    Teddy's Instagram: teddybaldas...
    Ben's Instagram: submersible...
    Top Articles On TeddyBaldassarre.com:
    50 Luxury Watch Brands You Should Know: teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/wa...
    10 Affordable Watch Brands And Their Best Watches: teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/wa...
    Best Watches Under $5,000 Complete Guide: teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/wa...
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 1,3 тыс.

  • @damisu8
    @damisu8 Год назад +334

    If I fell 50m out of a heli, I don’t think I’d be too worried about my watch

    • @keqrou
      @keqrou 7 месяцев назад +19

      Not me, I'm the guy who swims 200m deep and tests the watch. They try to tell you they use a pressure chamber but no, it's me. Same as the drop rating G shock actually made me jump of the statue of Jesus's in Brazil as it was the perfect height. Watch only got scratches from my wrist hitting it as my skin is harder than metal. Diving 1000m deep for some of those higher end dive waters was tough but still light work as im, well...me. so you're welcome.

    • @imaprinta
      @imaprinta 6 месяцев назад +9

      If you fell 50 meters out of a helli, wouldn't it comfort you to know that there would be something left to leave your family?

    • @keqrou
      @keqrou 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@imaprinta well I dont have to worry about that, done it plenty of times and I'm only slightly retarded

    • @roamingfaber4302
      @roamingfaber4302 5 месяцев назад

      Lmak

    • @vaanjinathanramasamy5493
      @vaanjinathanramasamy5493 3 месяца назад

      @@keqrou I appreciate your work. That pretty tough job tbh.

  • @riccardoguareschi193
    @riccardoguareschi193 Год назад +263

    there are a lot of design features that make it so drop-resistant: The strap acts as a spring, so if it happens to fall back-down, that will absorb a lot of energy, the case is framed in a deformable material which protects lateral impacts, the crystal is recessed below the frame, so, unless hitting on something protruding out of the ground, it is still protected. Finally, being generally light, it has a small momentum when free-falling from normal heights. That is really an amazing line

    • @sinjon
      @sinjon Год назад +14

      Yeah but the 5600 has the least recessed crystal. I’d like to see other models done but that’d get expensive

    • @Ajrdgg7555
      @Ajrdgg7555 Год назад +5

      You forget adding about the "floating module" concept

    • @Maikatiii
      @Maikatiii Год назад

      @@Ajrdgg7555 can you give an explanation ?

    • @rohitarvind1845
      @rohitarvind1845 Год назад +2

      @SinJon
      Would you recommend me the toughest Gshock around 100-150$ that's worth every penny, coz I really dunno abt it
      P.S: I'm from INDIA

    • @dsfgasdgqweq3456t534
      @dsfgasdgqweq3456t534 10 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@rohitarvind1845the 5610 is the best at that price

  • @xaviermcquiston1604
    @xaviermcquiston1604 Год назад +105

    Who would have thought a couple years ago that Teddy would go from watch reviews in his office to dropping GShocks out of helicopters? Congrats man, this is awesome!

    • @uuuultra
      @uuuultra Год назад

      He realized what content people actually want to see

    • @yoannwaucheul6912
      @yoannwaucheul6912 Год назад

      Funny that from an american point of view, dropping things out of helicopters can be seen as an achievment... 'MURICA is not a myth !

    • @BR81-iv6lt
      @BR81-iv6lt 2 месяца назад

      ​@@uuuultraboobs?

    • @MrBowelz
      @MrBowelz Месяц назад

      He did not drop them out of the heli he was too scared.

  • @JohnnyJohnJon83
    @JohnnyJohnJon83 Год назад +160

    Might want to take note the helicopter is applying more downward wind velocity causing the watches to go down much faster than a normal drop day off the side of the building

    • @YeCannyDaeThat
      @YeCannyDaeThat Год назад +27

      Not directly underneath it it isn't. There is a sort of "curtain" of air circling the edge of the rotor pushing down hard but directly under the heli there is no movement of air. Source: I work on a rescue boat and we often have to go under coastgaurd heli's and you have to punch throught the air curtain, you can feel it, but directly underneath it there is no downward air draft.

    • @hyedefinition1080
      @hyedefinition1080 Год назад +1

      @@YeCannyDaeThat wind curtains, like that! Kind of like a hurricane or a tornado 😅

    • @miguellazaro4405
      @miguellazaro4405 10 месяцев назад +5

      @@YeCannyDaeThat you clearly can see the watches get acceleration because they do not just drop it, they throw them

    • @Crazytesseract
      @Crazytesseract 10 месяцев назад

      JohnnyJohnyJohnJonJoJ

    • @IemonandIime
      @IemonandIime 8 месяцев назад +6

      tthe increased initial acceleration doesn't matter because the watch will hit terminal velocity before it hits the ground regardless of it the downward force applied by the helicopter is present or not

  • @adriansierra751
    @adriansierra751 Год назад +872

    Teddy is going to be bigger than Top Gear in 5 years.

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  Год назад +178

      Haha no way but I am flattered. Thanks for watching and the support buddy!

    • @FreshYoungDude
      @FreshYoungDude Год назад +56

      The greatest watch… IN THE WORLD.

    • @MercilessGuitar151
      @MercilessGuitar151 Год назад +27

      @@FreshYoungDude i read this with clarkson's voice. Nailed it. :)

    • @edgarroche
      @edgarroche Год назад +5

      @@TeddyBaldassarre Cool video, perhaps more like this, expeditions, diving, workouts, or just plain sightseeing when comparing watches for different occasions.

    • @ashneel
      @ashneel Год назад +9

      Lol calm down

  • @thedeadshed5719
    @thedeadshed5719 Год назад +113

    I am a welder and I wear a GW-B5600 every day. This video confirms what a lot of us already know and love about these things, they are tough as nails no matter how hard we beat them. Great video!

    • @markymarknj
      @markymarknj Год назад +6

      As a Navy vet who beat the crap out of an original G-Shock, I can vouch for that!

  • @Wireless_Gadgets
    @Wireless_Gadgets Год назад +279

    This is different, never thought how tough G-Shock watches were. I'd like to see the popular GA2100 dropped and see how it does withe the analogue hands. Thank you!

    • @paksijoco9801
      @paksijoco9801 Год назад +18

      I +1 this. I assume digital Gs can withstand more as they have no moving parts. It would be interesting to see how analog models fare, like a CasiOak. Or maybe a more expensive analog/digital model, like a Rangeman/Bluetooth Mudmaster. Also, what happens with steel watches, like the GW-5000. A single model doesn't really show how strong these watches are (or not). Also, the comparison was kinda unfair since you compared an all resin watch with much heavier, metal/bracelet watches. What happens with an all plastic Amazon watch? Or an F91w? Cool idea, but definitely needs a follow up with more watches and compare them from a reasonable height, like dropping all of them from 10 meters, multiple times.

    • @whatsstefon
      @whatsstefon Год назад +13

      I think with the carbon core providing that shock support, it would likely be similar or close. I’d assume Casio tests the shit out of any watch that bares the G-Shock branding.

    • @MuhammadImran93
      @MuhammadImran93 Год назад +3

      Cool idea to test, bad idea for daily life.
      I owned a GA-201 (analog & digital) once. Dropped it around 3 times on separate occasions, around the height of human torso (1m-1.5m). After the third drop, the analog hands went crazy; it still runs, but in weird way (there are times it runs parallel with normal clock, and the other times it moves slower/stop moving). I guess the gears in the body are busted. But it still runs the digital clock correctly.

    • @roybatty4687
      @roybatty4687 Год назад +2

      Yeah it's not like they ever advertise them as tough. Much.

    • @whatsstefon
      @whatsstefon Год назад +3

      @@roybatty4687 ha. As tough as they can be. They’re still a watch after all.
      I’d say dropping them from a helicopter exceeded the design spec that Casio tested their watches with. I think the damage and lack of damage was purely a fluke.
      It would be interesting to see more scientific data to back this up, however this channel and this episode are not and were not about science. It was just a fun experiment.

  • @swanney75
    @swanney75 Год назад +108

    The mass of a G Shock will mean it reaches terminal velocity at about 23m off the ground so the damage will be exactly the same at anything above that- still fun to watch them messing around though 😁

    • @IStillLikeIke
      @IStillLikeIke Год назад +5

      Was thinking the same thing lol

    • @roybatty4687
      @roybatty4687 Год назад +4

      That's exactly what I was thinking. Impact even looked similar.

    • @swanney75
      @swanney75 Год назад +5

      True but mass effects how quickly it reaches terminal velocity in relation to drag- something big and light will take longer to reach terminal velocity than something small and heavy- just kept the comment simple

    • @gunterkastenfrosch698
      @gunterkastenfrosch698 Год назад +10

      @@swanney75 that is not true: terminal velocity is dictated by the drag coefficient alone. The mass is only important when talking about the kinetic energy of the object.

    • @swanney75
      @swanney75 Год назад +8

      Thanks guys- looked into it more and you’re right! Always thought that’s how it worked but as always- things are more complex than you first think! never too old to learn new things 👍

  • @HRM.H
    @HRM.H Год назад +274

    Now this is a cool idea teddy !!! I would love to see something similar done with dive watches. Cool stuff teddy , keep it up

    • @RobplusPiper
      @RobplusPiper Год назад +23

      Pressure tank test. How many atm’s can they ‘really’ handle?

    • @ge48421
      @ge48421 Год назад +13

      @@RobplusPiper There's a video on RUclips of a Vostok Amphibia failing at 80 bar (800m) in a pressure tank. It's rated for 200m.
      ruclips.net/video/FwNFy2A7rmU/видео.html
      It would be interesting to pressure test a Hublot...🤣

    • @mousemousejim6352
      @mousemousejim6352 Год назад

      Teddy at 20,000 league’s under the sea

    • @matthewholzner9526
      @matthewholzner9526 Год назад

      There are some videos online of GShocks being tested and working past 60 bar.

    • @coreyt008
      @coreyt008 Год назад

      @@RobplusPiper Yess!

  • @HaloV37
    @HaloV37 Год назад +315

    I enjoyed the video. I would have liked to see how the larger G-shocks or a casioak would have faired at the same test.

    • @memelicious1924
      @memelicious1924 Год назад +17

      Larger models like the mudmaster have a thicker protection layer but weigh a bit more. Probably the same result.

    • @jackrayner1263
      @jackrayner1263 Год назад +20

      Then do it with a royal oak

    • @HaloV37
      @HaloV37 Год назад +12

      @@jackrayner1263 That would have been a very expensive experiment. I guess that’s what the cheap Amazon versions are there for. Normal watches are not built for that huge a shock. It’s super impressive that the G shock can withstand that large an impact.

    • @HaloV37
      @HaloV37 Год назад +8

      @@memelicious1924 I agree, the larger mass would have likely caused the same results. Would have been interesting to see if the screen was the failing point though. Something like the Casio oak with its hands might have had slightly better or worse results at that 30 meter point. But still very good video and good to know if I take a helicopter ride I can loose my gshock out the window as long as we are under 30 meters at the time.

    • @bubblewrapvillain
      @bubblewrapvillain Год назад +3

      The G shocks with hands are more likely to break.

  • @manoflego123
    @manoflego123 Год назад +79

    It's very impressive when you remember that the original goal of the G-Shock was just to survive 10m of free fall on to concrete. It's not supposed to be unkillable, it just has to survive more than you can lol.

    • @hb9145
      @hb9145 Год назад

      Yes, if it breaks on your wrist, you are probably dead.

    • @kerwinwade1884
      @kerwinwade1884 Год назад +3

      Lol that's true 👌😂

    • @AlexanderShelestov
      @AlexanderShelestov Год назад +2

      But what's the point? I don't care if the cheap module inside the cage survives. I more care how they look like - I won't wear them anymore in any case because of scratches :)
      So I don't understand this conception at all.

    • @manoflego123
      @manoflego123 Год назад +10

      @@AlexanderShelestov if it fell far enough to scratch the case, and you were wearing it at the time, you would probably be too dead from the fall to care, that's what it means lol

    • @AlexanderShelestov
      @AlexanderShelestov Год назад +1

      @@manoflego123 Funny but you should've told it to the g-shock creator :)

  • @RobplusPiper
    @RobplusPiper Год назад +57

    I’m really curious to see how a set of bull bars on the GM 5600 would do in a drop test. Also need to see the CasiOak GA B2100 drop test. Maybe also do a big one? like a Mudmaster or “Gravity Master” 😉 with an analog/digital display, and the “King of G” - test the toughest G-Shocks. Awesome video and idea btw - maybe start a go fund me to help with heli fuel and G-SHOCK expenses lol, I’ll donate right now!!

  • @Podcastage
    @Podcastage Год назад +61

    Teddy, I speak for everyone when I say this: "YOU ARE A MADMAN! And we're all here for it."

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  Год назад +14

      Ben is the madman. He gets the credit and glory.

    • @Muzly
      @Muzly Год назад

      Doobly doo ❤️

  • @dakotajohnson9230
    @dakotajohnson9230 Год назад +96

    Teddy, so glad you’re doing stuff like this. Sick video bro. More like this !!

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  Год назад +42

      It was a lot to put together. 5 cameras, 5 person video crew and had to reschedule twice for weather. Glad it finally came together!

    • @coreyt008
      @coreyt008 Год назад +2

      @@TeddyBaldassarre Worth it! Awesome content!

    • @z28camarobc
      @z28camarobc Год назад

      Should have used the ga series. Of course those screens were gonna crack.

    • @markymarknj
      @markymarknj Год назад

      YES!

  • @kdtechniquesofficial6153
    @kdtechniquesofficial6153 3 месяца назад

    Thanks for your time man. Loved it.

  • @randallhill7979
    @randallhill7979 Год назад +1

    Awesome video Teddy, thank you

  • @x73v
    @x73v Год назад +70

    The fact that this is even suspenseful to watch is a testiment to how strong we view gshocks, any other watch would be a no brainer that it would break💥

    • @briane1116
      @briane1116 Год назад +3

      I was holding my breath waiting for T to pick up the 100m drop and go “IT WORKS!” Alas, that didn’t happen.

  • @KrisHandsome
    @KrisHandsome Год назад +34

    This is something I always wanted to do or see but can’t. Does prove the strength of a G-Shock though; any height that G-Shock would break from while you’re wearing it would be a height where the condition of the watch would be the least of your worries.

  • @gonzalograjeda7389
    @gonzalograjeda7389 Год назад +1

    What a great video Teddy! Loved the intro and the whole sequence overall!

  • @international_dave
    @international_dave Год назад

    Such an awesome video, enjoyed this episode, thanks.

  • @omarbsalama
    @omarbsalama Год назад +5

    One of the best videos you've made Teddy!

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  Год назад +5

      We are happy how it turned out. This was a team effort!

  • @rafaelribeiro404
    @rafaelribeiro404 Год назад +12

    it's amazing how much of blast Teddy was having lol. If I ever had to vote for the "happiest ever Teddy" this one won hands down.
    Amazing video as always!

  • @jacobmeyer2092
    @jacobmeyer2092 Год назад

    Fantastic. One of the most fun watch videos I’ve ever seen

  • @ClemsonNY13
    @ClemsonNY13 Год назад

    Loved this!!! Great work!

  • @oliverarado
    @oliverarado Год назад +19

    As I watch this I’m wearing my DW5600BB. My reaction has been two fold so to speak. One, petrified at the destruction of “my” watch and two, glad that I still kept mine. Thanks Teddy for reinforcing my love of G-Shock.

    • @rahulbishnoi3901
      @rahulbishnoi3901 Год назад +1

      I'm planning to buy the same, i.e. 5600BB, how is it overall, and how long does the battery last. Thanks.

  • @nicholasestrela3776
    @nicholasestrela3776 Год назад +4

    Great episode. Definitely recommend more like these! A whole G-Shock series would be great. Could come up with fun ideas. An underwater episode; high heat; etc...

  • @Supraman7777
    @Supraman7777 Год назад

    Great video!! Thank you

  • @PaulKaiser42
    @PaulKaiser42 Год назад

    So much fun…great vid as always teddy!!!!

  • @markrasmussen6489
    @markrasmussen6489 Год назад +7

    Teddy really makes time fly with these videos

  • @torrescabrera
    @torrescabrera Год назад +5

    Great video Teddy! I feel proud owning my G Shock.

  • @gdec9243
    @gdec9243 Год назад

    That was a super entertaining video...many thanks, great work!

  • @111111111Tiger
    @111111111Tiger Год назад

    Teddy's best video ever... thank you

  • @TropospherePixels
    @TropospherePixels Год назад +70

    would be interesting to see how they would fare on different surfaces. would the g-shock survive a 100 meter drop if it lands on gras?

    • @isaacalzate8262
      @isaacalzate8262 Год назад

      I didn't think about that but yeah that would be cool?

    • @MusikPiratCH
      @MusikPiratCH Год назад +3

      I think it wouldn't make much of a difference because at the hights of 30 meters gras is almost as hard as any other surface! Remember the watch is falling down at 9.81m/s^2! 🤔

    • @jesstotten5571
      @jesstotten5571 Год назад +4

      My guess is that it would do much better on grass aka dirt. Any resilience in the surface it impacts will go a long way towards reducing peak accelerations and thus peak stresses. Still, only one way to find out!

    • @MusikPiratCH
      @MusikPiratCH Год назад

      @@jesstotten5571 Why guessing? What happens if you jump into the water from 10 meters or from 30 meters? The water gets harder and harder! You cannot even land heads first from 30 meters! 🤔

    • @OwlsAndPidgeons
      @OwlsAndPidgeons Год назад

      @@MusikPiratCH yeah, but you are a squishy wobbly waterfuelled human ballon with a brittle skeleton structure. This is a G-Shock. Even 5 meters would probably break you.

  • @tuckshop
    @tuckshop Год назад +10

    Teddy doing the important research so we don’t have to! That was a fun episode Teddy!

  • @lucianofantin
    @lucianofantin Год назад

    Great video guys! Fun to watch and well thought.

  • @angelopepe6016
    @angelopepe6016 Год назад +1

    I think this was a great video! It really helped us to see what level of impact the G-Shock could sustain. It certainly has cleared up any doubts! Teddy, this was cool and apropos for this watch.

  • @denniskai2331
    @denniskai2331 Год назад +3

    AWESOME - Was not expecting anything like this on this channel - totally cool (made me want to buy a new casio G)

  • @GasBill
    @GasBill Год назад +16

    Fun video! It would have been more fair if the control watches were plastic/rubber quartz watches.

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  Год назад +11

      To be honest the test was more for the g-shocks and seeing how they would withstand the different heights rather. The inclusion of the other watches was more for the excuse to throw more watches and see them explode not to be a direct comparison for testing against other brands.

  • @niklaszx4011
    @niklaszx4011 7 месяцев назад

    Great fun! Thanks for doing this stuff.

  • @AfiftheChief
    @AfiftheChief Год назад

    Really enjoyed this. Great video/idea

  • @tougenomikado
    @tougenomikado Год назад +33

    Would love to see this again! Perhaps with a nice mix of G-Shocks. Some analogue, some digital, perhaps a metal one? Perhaps from 500 meters?

    • @x201t
      @x201t Год назад +1

      5000 m

  • @brianmsahin
    @brianmsahin Год назад +3

    Excellent video Teddy! I missed this one as we were on a mountaineering holiday in Turkey, and I dropped a Mudmaster GG-1000 as I was checking a compass bearing, fell about 50 metres, bounced all the way down and was perfect except for scuffs on the strap. Really enjoyed this video. Excellent job! Maybe you can try a Rolex Submariner next. 🤔😜😂😂

  • @dennismiller4062
    @dennismiller4062 Год назад

    Great Job! More of this content please!!!!

  • @jacksonoakley5887
    @jacksonoakley5887 Год назад

    Love the creativity of this video! Super cool that you're pushing the boundaries and doing fun stuff in the watch space

  • @scottypeep93
    @scottypeep93 Год назад +33

    Kind of goes with what other people have said, but I’m guessing the G-Shocks are almost unbreakable as long as they don’t land on their face (low terminal velocity). The straps stabilize them though, so they land on their face mostly.

  • @hughlws
    @hughlws Год назад +4

    Less than a minute in and you have earned your like sir, this is a great idea, awesome stuff 👏 👏👏👏

  • @parkerrawson01
    @parkerrawson01 Год назад +1

    Teddy, this video was next level. I enjoy the enthusiasm you put into everything watches. You are doing great work!

  • @johnnychen235
    @johnnychen235 Год назад

    Great RUclips idea Teddy! Love it!

  • @xxjep0yxx
    @xxjep0yxx Год назад +4

    Would love more of these types of videos. Maybe next time do a diver watch depth challenge??

  • @DavidHammer83
    @DavidHammer83 Год назад +15

    Resin G-Shock usually withstand a lot, would be interesting to see how a metal G-Shock handle the drops, like a GMW, GST, GM series. Nice video!

  • @asadpetkar3921
    @asadpetkar3921 Год назад

    Wow, one of the best you have done Teddy…👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

  • @ferdinandmelchor4242
    @ferdinandmelchor4242 Год назад

    Great Content sir!

  • @bravenkind7843
    @bravenkind7843 Год назад +55

    As surprisingly durable as the GShocks are, the helicopter may be pushing them down faster by air flow. If they were dropped from a stationary tower I suspect you could add 10m to the height most broke at.

  • @darth_jarjar123
    @darth_jarjar123 Год назад +5

    Man I really liked the vid! Speaking about looks or specs is always nice, but it's just a different thing to put the watch to the test 😎. I work as a firefighter, and I'm super into beater watches that suit my job. Would be awesome to see more testing videos on this channel. Water resistance under pressure? Humidity resistance under extreme temperature changes? Shock resistance on different non g-shock watches? Anyway, thank you for the vid! 🚒🚑 Stay safe 😎👊

  • @DecemberNames
    @DecemberNames Год назад

    Thank you for another great video

  • @sasanachmor
    @sasanachmor Год назад

    Great fun. Thanks for the video.

  • @gcocatre
    @gcocatre Год назад +7

    This is more exhilarating than destroying Rolex replicas with a shotgun. This actually shows how tough our beloved G-Shocks are. I like when Teddy tries new things on RUclips. It reminds me of the video where he makes his friends guess the prices of various luxury watches. It was a lot of fun, and so is this. More, please!

  • @dorbei
    @dorbei Год назад +3

    G-Shock - the only watch that will survive it's owner.

  • @megasoid
    @megasoid Год назад

    What a great idea for a video...good job!

  • @jackrayner1263
    @jackrayner1263 Год назад +1

    Such a good video, love the idea

  • @PhilbyFavourites
    @PhilbyFavourites Год назад +4

    I love the way Teddy looks the consummate urban professional, even out in the wild and woolly wasteland of the local airfield.

  • @sean1e100
    @sean1e100 Год назад +11

    Awesome… love these excursions out into the field. For next time: a camera at ground level filming the crash zone at 120fps would have been next level.

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  Год назад +6

      The impacts were all recorded in 4K 120 fps fully slowed down. So we would have had to get a ultra slow mo camera to go any slower.

    • @SLevinCinema
      @SLevinCinema Год назад +1

      @@TeddyBaldassarre @TheSlowMoGuys :D

  • @sourabhshetty2200
    @sourabhshetty2200 Год назад +1

    Awesome content Teddy. You are putting a lot of efforts to get us common folks more and more into the watch world.

  • @andresmontielalcantara562
    @andresmontielalcantara562 Год назад

    Just a lot of effort and production on this one, thanks Teddy for this kind of content.

  • @erikdunbar4451
    @erikdunbar4451 Год назад +18

    I’d be curious how high they could survive if dropped on grass?

    • @alexanderverdoodt
      @alexanderverdoodt Год назад +1

      I was wondering the same

    • @oi_bilbo1082
      @oi_bilbo1082 Год назад

      G-Shock Helicopter Drop Episode 2

    • @heiner71
      @heiner71 Год назад +4

      I don't think they would break on grass from any height. They probably already reach terminal velocity at 30 meters.

  • @dannyg6592
    @dannyg6592 Год назад +6

    Impressive results. I was just telling a friend last week that I thought my DW-5600 could withstand a fall from a 10 story building and you proved I am correct. They are very tough watches.

  • @andyc6736
    @andyc6736 Год назад

    Very cool and fun video! Something different from the usual format! Well done!

  • @fredrikhansen3367
    @fredrikhansen3367 Год назад

    Great video! Keep up the good work!

  • @maartenkroes1957
    @maartenkroes1957 Год назад +5

    Great video. I did such with a Vostok, it broke at 50m, I've used a drone wich has far less downward airflow than a Heli. I think you can add 20-30m for the G-shock with your heli.

  • @Brsawesome
    @Brsawesome Год назад +14

    Although a cool experiment, the rotor wash does (initially) speeds up the watch when its thrown out of the chopper. I would imagine that the watch can actually take a fall from a far higher height before breaking into pieces, for example, when thrown from a building. (Edit: typo's)

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  Год назад +7

      We were waiting for this comment after shooting it. Fair point for sure given the downward force from the helicopter.

    • @dultanur
      @dultanur Год назад +7

      Actually I don't think thats true. The watch is quite light and I believe reaches terminal velocity pretty quickly. I'm guessing that's the reason for the damage looking so similar 30 metres and higher.

    • @michaeljohnson-ic1gf
      @michaeljohnson-ic1gf Год назад +3

      Hot Air Balloon.

  • @Ta_nuz
    @Ta_nuz Год назад

    enjoyed to the fullest🙋
    great upload. thanks for this brilliant experiment.

  • @johnbyler8018
    @johnbyler8018 Год назад

    Great video, Teddy!!

  • @mclaughlinja1995
    @mclaughlinja1995 Год назад +5

    Ben has some guts to go up in that contraption 😂

  • @JS-ev4xc
    @JS-ev4xc Год назад +3

    Only G-Shock will be able to stand such a vigorous test, isn't it amazing? It makes all other watches meaningless in a way.

  • @luismartinez3016
    @luismartinez3016 Год назад

    This probably has been one of my favorite watch videos ever! Great job!

  • @megadead1837
    @megadead1837 Год назад

    crazy awesome that experiment

  • @robinhook37
    @robinhook37 Год назад +4

    Interesting video. Two issues: 1) at a certain height the dropping object will reaching terminal velocity and any additional height doesn’t make any difference. 2) The weight of the watch makes a ton of difference in terminal velocity, as well as the kinetic energy of impact. So dropping watches with different weight is really not comparing apple to apple.
    I feel Teddy should have explained the science and done some calculations in the video. That’ll make the experiment more informative.

  • @ryanpatterson9526
    @ryanpatterson9526 Год назад

    Cool video, Teddy! Great idea!

  • @yoyiyoyi7216
    @yoyiyoyi7216 Год назад

    Great experiment

  • @BrunoBzow
    @BrunoBzow Год назад

    Really fun video. Thank you for doing it. Love my gshocks

  • @goodjob6582
    @goodjob6582 Год назад

    You went crazy with this Teddy!!!!! Such a fun video.

  • @NickNick-id8sb
    @NickNick-id8sb Год назад

    I love the reviews, comparisons, which watch suits different kinds of people. All of that stuff. This was totally different and sooo cool. Hands down best video Teddy's ever made!

  • @jackdaniels8030
    @jackdaniels8030 Год назад

    Awesome video. Love the different style! And love it that you wear a Casio for this test 😄

  • @ComicBookVeteran
    @ComicBookVeteran Год назад

    Very cool! Nicely done!

  • @mikesvirtualhikeandtours1721
    @mikesvirtualhikeandtours1721 Год назад

    I love this. Don't stop making great watch content.

  • @Loveisalongroad
    @Loveisalongroad 9 месяцев назад

    We love you Teddy! Watching your channel is a very classy thing to do.

  • @Joshuatronics
    @Joshuatronics Год назад

    Kudos! Excellent video!! Greeting from Argentina

  • @blackshit7
    @blackshit7 Год назад

    This was awesome! Love ityy

  • @markhor1988
    @markhor1988 Год назад

    The editing great. U stepped it up. Impressive.

  • @mickjapsschannel
    @mickjapsschannel Год назад

    Im enjoying this video so much, thanks teddy

  • @aaawwweeee
    @aaawwweeee Год назад

    This was very entertaining to watch !!!!!!!

  • @achuthanmanishnair772
    @achuthanmanishnair772 Год назад

    Loved the video!

  • @aidanisan
    @aidanisan Год назад

    great episode Teddy and a fab idea

  • @faroe6410
    @faroe6410 Год назад

    Dude, great video. Exciting 😅✊👍

  • @AlejoFalvo
    @AlejoFalvo Год назад

    Very fun episode!

  • @MiguelSanchez-ct2cv
    @MiguelSanchez-ct2cv Год назад

    Love real world testing. Thanks for the hard work!

  • @gabep3058
    @gabep3058 Год назад

    Amazing job bro!

  • @papricep6248
    @papricep6248 Год назад

    Very cool video! More G Shock content please

  • @SachinDeshpande5193
    @SachinDeshpande5193 Год назад

    One of the best guys in the business. Go, Teddy!

  • @gregcapella5941
    @gregcapella5941 Год назад

    Cool stuff teddy , keep it up