Absolutely! Coming expansion of ULEZ in London is a great test on how far people can go for their freedom and how many of us. This expansion is clearly “an offer” but not “an order”. There is no even legal basis under it, never mind lawful. It is an offer to pay for “something” and threats for not agreeing on ”the offer”. This is clearly a daylight robbery in 21st century style. Mass rejection of ”the offer” and non-compliance would send a massive signal to THEM - We are the people are not the slaves; Keep your hands off us and our future. Would People be able to show who is the master, like people of Birmingham did? I very much hope so.
We don't need a loophole, we just need en masse civil disobedience, if EVERYONE refuses to pay it and any associated fines will just bury TFL in paperwork.
Lol 😂 We needed massive civil disobedience when they were forcing people to wearing face nappies and constant lockdowns yet the sheep complied. Its too late for disobedience
And stop using his Rang Rover and lead buy example and ride a bike 🚲 like Boris did when he was mayor but then people liked Boris 😂 I don't think Khan we ould dare ride a 🚲 to work .
This would be an “equal venture,” an article on the SCIP published by The Jerusalem Post in March asserts that New York’s state government will be funding the entire $2 million Bob Langer The Coronavirus "Common Denominator" Tied To Charles Lieber & Israel's NY "Smart Cities“ "As technology advancesTied Innovation Partnership,” Dr. Ami Applebaum - chairman of the Israel Innovation Authority and Chief Scientists of the Israel’s Economy Ministry - stated the following and touches every facet of our daily lives, the future of Smart Cities is just around the corner and highly depends to [sic] new and innovative technologies. This collaboration between the ESD (Empire State Development of New York State) and the Israel Innovation Authority, facilitated by our Americas Operations desk and the Ministry of Economy, Foreign Trade Administration (FTA), headed by Mr. Inon Elroy, Economic Minister to North America, will provide startups an opportunity for pilot validation sites to address the strategic concerns of both States such as cybersecurity, supply chain, energy, health, transportation, wastewater, water, civic engagement, parks, public works, and safety.” The partnership specifically called for the establishment of five “Smart Cities” in Regional Economic Development Council (REDC) regions in New York that would interact with “test bed sites” created in Israel. This means that this “smart city” partnership only involves the creation of smart cities in New York, not Israel, but gives Israeli companies a major role in designing these five New York smart cities. Though the press release from last year claims project, giving $1 million to the Israel Innovation Authority and $1 million to Israeli companies. The New York government website, however, currently states that the $2 million partnership involves New York state giving $1 million exclusively to New York-based companies and the Israel Innovation Authority giving additional $1 million exclusively for Israeli companies seeking to develop New York-based projects. .... Witney Webb !!!
@@rogerphelps9939Cash is king stand against card transactions anything digital is evil and wrong the government can control weather or not your family eats because they have control of your funds however physical cash you'll have to pry from my dead body
Not enough leverage from a minority group. Despite the incorrect propaganda, over 90% of vehicles driven in the Ulez are exempt. Of those that are not, only a small percentage fail to pay the fee and of those, only a tiny percent fail to pay the penalty charge. This means they are an easy target for the courts and bailifs.
In South Africa, they set up the same and spent millions doing it. They just don't pay it. The only thing you can do is not pay it in protest and If all of London does it, they won't have the money to enforce it...
The answer is very simple, everyone ignore it. Throw away any letters, ignore any communication. If millions of people did this it could not be viable.
Or write across it that you do not consent or wish to contract with this unlawful scheme of extortion and they must cease and desist any further unlawful demands, keep a copy for your records and post the original back to them.
NONE of these ULEZ roads are what they claim,and should be referred to being "Scam Zones"because that's what they are. Vehicles that are "non compliant" (some arbitrary made up standard)can still use these roads,so pollution levels will be no different. The only change will be the drivers being made to pay for exactly the same thing they were doing previously. It's a scam,and yet nobody seems interested in confronting Khan with this fact.
It's worse than a scam. It's actual fascism. This is Hitler's wet dream and that is no exaggeration. Klaus Schwabb has learned from Hitler's mistakes, and he's infiltrated every government, corporation and the media. There is no Churchill to fight against this new wave of Nazism. Everyone is accepting it instead and worshipping its image.
Nobody seems to confront the issue with Khan??? Where have you been ?? There have been MASSIVE protests in London for several weekends - MPs in the House have raged about it all, protests everywhere ... Wake Up ‼️
@@user-zz9gn2dc3l What people in the whole of ULEZ land need to do is come up with an independent to stand as mayor. What they don't want to do is vote for him again!! I'm guessing people in outer London areas that don't consider themselves as living in London as they are in Kent, Essex or Surrey etc towns that have been merged into London to pay the bills didn't realise what it meant for them. Or they probably thought it won't affect them.
I have an old Ford Galaxy diesel ..... it runs perfectly, and always passes it's MOT with ease. I registered the car to my brother a few years ago when the ULEZ zones started. It's accrued thousands of ULEZ notifications and fines. I'm waiting for them to come and try to collect the fines. My brother died 6 years ago, so good luck with that. But this one registering it in Khan's name seems an even better idea
@@GeoffBuysCars Thank you. Obviously not something anyone would want to happen, but I know he would have approved 100% I was just going to register the car in a ficticious name, but saw the opportunity ...... but the idea is the same .....
For me the worst issue I have with this ULEZ is that these vehicles complied with the regulations at the time of manufacture. Some of us buy vehicles with the intention of keeping them for a long time. Also, its possible to retrofit filters to reduce pollution.
@user-tq1qd3iu2t Is it really a trojan house though diesel emissions are very toxic the same way we stopped using leaded fuel, maybe city centers aren't really the place for heavy diesel exhaust emissions. Maybe we do need to start moving with the times and ditch dirty diesel
I've lived in France for nearly twenty years and for your information every large city in France has a similar system, but nobody rioted ! Why ? Because the French are more intelligent than the English.
@@brianferguson7840 They aren't if they accepted this as it is not founded in any real science and no one has rioted in the UK so what are you on about?
the guy sending the DVLA the paper slip off the vehicle v5 document and putting Sadiq Khan, as the new registered owner of the vehicle is classic, love it.
But you are signing a declaration on the V5 document. That declaration is confirmation that you are telling the truth. If you are not its Motor Fraud. Check out the blackbelt barrister who has just covered this idea.
They will just do like Australia if you don't pay your fines your licence goes under FINES SUSPENSION and you got no licence at all until the fine is payed and only then your LICENCE SUSPENSION is lifted, non payment of the fines won't change a thing they will make sure of it
If I lived in London I wouldn’t pay this TAX . I was a POLL TAX protester and didn’t pay ( even after bailiffs turned up ) and Maggie Thatcher was out in 6 months . Unite everyone 👍
NYC are attempting to do the same thing as London : my message to New Yorkers , and the people/ drivers of America is that it won’t stop there . Idiot politicians don’t know when to stop screwing us over . Beware America and don’t follow London . Don’t let it happen
What does being American have to do with having empathy towards those suffering under the creeping totalitarianism? No one in the western world is free from it. We are all one against the globalists. It simply has variations in its manifestation.
There seems to be a big push to get people to accept without question, new technologies and ditch what they have formerly been using for years. As an analogy, look at vinyl records, cassette tape, MiniDisc and CD's. All of those technologies were milked for years, and then we were told that THIS or THAT are the next thing, so we should get rid of them. The EV future is highly questionable, because the charging infrastructure is nowhere near ready.
It's very funny, but looking for loopholes is acceptance of the rule. Protest this outside your MPs and Kahn's houses. If they make life uncomfortable for us then we make it worse for them.
In political philosophy, the phrase 'consent of the governed' refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power, is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised. In a democracy, politicians take their orders from the majority, if they refuse to seek consent - they should be sacked. If they don't get sacked, legal action should be taken. If legal action is not possible - revolution is required to purge the corruption.
Iv been doing this my whole life and county court and tv licence didn't pay a penny in council tax till I was 50 I'm 51... also stat declaration magestrates court allows you to wipe all fines and licence points away if you didn't know about proceedings so get letter ignore it get court day ignore it get convicted in your absence call or amend magestrates claim ignorance to proceedings they have to stat declaration your convicti9n away as you didn't get a chance to defend your self I did it with speeding offences and many other cases deedpoll name change again change name walk away I don't pay imaginary debts
Great video, anything that can be used to inconvenience Khan & TFL definitely gets a thumbs up from me. I used to own a transport business & had two depots based in Battersea, West London & Maidenhead, Berks. All my vehicles (22 of them) were in & out of C Charge zone pretty much every day. All of these vehicles however were registered to a Regus accommodation address in Edinburgh & were legally out of reach to any enforcement agents looking to recover C Charge fines & parking fines. Did this for 12 years & never paid a single fine in all that time despite racking up thousands of pounds of them. All perfectly legally too. I know of 3 other hauliers who now have their vehicles registered elsewhere too for that exact same reason, two in Schipol, Holland & one in Dublin. It doesn't stop you getting the fines but it does stop enforcement agents pursuing you for non payment - you just deny receiving any notice of enforcement letters. Result.
@@pauls3075 exactly! Now what the person who registered with him is make sure someone else is driving. For example he is on a flight at the time of the offence. The reason is khan will say the driver was the donor. But with proof he is in the air, khan has perverted the course of justice
When I bought my hybrid car, road tax was £0. Now the road tax on the car is £145 and have to pay congestion charge. Which is so unfair cos I sold my perfectly good diesel car to avoid road tax and congestion. Now I'm hearing tax per mile
We get to vote for one of "their" dictator puppets owned and controlled by them, it's like choosing between a dog sh*t, cat sh*t and rat sh*t sandwich and then being told "well you chose it".
One of our cars is registered in my dad's name at his old address (I incorrectly said "my car" initially). He died over 20 years ago. As far as I'm concerned, if it's OK for them to use underhand tactics to extract more money from us then it's perfectly OK for us to use underhand tactics to protect ourselves. People, always remember that the roads do NOT belong to the government and councils to be used as a cash cow, they are PUBLIC roads. As for pollution, scientists proved many years ago that brake dust is one of the biggest problems for people with asthma - yet thanks to congestion, which is often caused by removing available roads to use as bus lanes etc - there is MORE brake dust in the air than ever before. So "traffic calming" schemes etc. are probably at least partly responsible for the increase in children with asthma. This is one of the reasons I don't believe the "clean air" bollox.
Not least that 'traffic calming' increases local emissions from braking, acceleration and noise...right outside front doors, school gates and hospital gates. World class bollocks!
I think you never heard the term induced demand my friend and is a bus lane really that bad? Honestly I enjoy them as then my bus can speed right through the traffic.
@@Mgameing123 Yes, bus lanes are great - if you're on a bus. But it's nothing to do with demand, it's about trying to force cars off the road. There are countless areas where there are bus lanes in operation 24/7 where buses only run once an hour, or once every 30 minutes or so up until a certain time, or not on Sundays etc. But that's not the point. The point is it's forcing other traffic off the roads, making drivers take a longer route and so on, NONE of which is helping the environment which is what the ULEZ thing is supposedly all about. Besides, buses are now just a private enterprise, in it for profit, why should they get any priority on roads that we all pay for? As I keep on reminding people, these are PUBLIC roads, not for certain people to use or for councils to do what they like with for financial benefit.
The bit that always makes my day is the low pollution zone at Heathrow airport. How the hell can you have a low pollution zone next to an airport ?? Then the icing on the cake, there is a 60mph speed restriction on the m4 due to air pollution levels..
Once they expand the zone in August I'm alarmed to notice that Heathrow will be INSIDE Khan's ULEZ zone - thus catching out all people (yes I know, those with Non Ulez compliant cars) coming to park at the airport or helpfully drop off/collect passengers. As people come from all over the country, if they're not Londoners or Southerners they may not even be aware of this atrocious scheme until they suddenly find fines dropping through their mailboxes. (Same with Dartford tunnel that very carefully fails everywhere to ever use the word TOLL on signs ....but that's another issue.😢) And will those who stay PARKED (say for 2 weeks whilst travelling away) be charged the fee for each interim day because they haven't yet exited the zone and therefore are assumed to have been inside the whole time, potentially travelling around the zone? Which, let's face it, is a bit rich if you were parked & immobile....plus already paying exorbitant parking fees!
Motorway speed limits in Wales are being reduced to 50mph, a section at a time so you`re lucky that you are, at the moment, still allowed to travel at 60mph. . We also have the 20mph limits being forced upon us in September, but, don`t worry as I`m sure these ridiculous schemes will be forced upon the whole country sooner or later.
@@martinf8508 50?? On a motorway? What planet are these nutters on, then forcing cars to crunch down to 20 everywhere else? Why? Just why? So you don't knock down children? Why are the little blighters gadding about in the road (which b.t.w. is for cars, pedestrians belong on the pavement!) Modern cars don't do these speeds, you're in lower gear thus emitting more of the supposed fumes they claim to want to eliminate (so how come your car easily passed that MOT emissions test??). I noticed that the restricted speeds inevitably meant if you got to a red light, the limited speed meant if you hit one you hit ALL of them so tailbacks were worse than cruising at a much more logical 30 in town and getting out of the zone correspondingly quicker. Cruise control won't hack it on such low speeds so you spend all your time glued also to the speedo in terror of being "caught speeding" at a whopping 21 MPH, because you might just be snapped by one the millions of cctv cameras & incur onerous and quite frankly ridiculous "fines" for a minor infraction you never knew you committed. Hadn't driven in London for 4 years, it's now an utter nightmare and I'm pretty brave. Was driving a friend to hospital appts IN London, but with all the restrictions, signs, cameras, lane changes and narrowing, chicanes, excessive street furniture, pedestrians & cyclists weaving madly all over the place, needing eyes in the back of your head, plus the stress of checking the Speedo every 5 seconds I came home utterly exhausted. Yes I DO try to use public transport wherever there IS any but so often it's simply not practical either for time or location (try making it to any rural location after 6 pm!!) .
As said previously, if it was about pollution and the populations health he would just ban the vehicles and not fine the owners, he is such a weasel old Mayor Khan't! It took a bit of time but another RUclipsr managed to make his 99 plate 1.7 Puma exempt by contacting the manufacturer and getting proof of its NOX value but he's owned it a very long time so it was worth it, i really hope we don't lose more retro/classics due to Mr Weasels money grabbing scrappage scheme!
How is outright banning these care better than having a fine to pay to use them? People with classic cars can still drive them as much as their budget allows, and it just feeds into the standard cost/benefit calculation we all do anyway (having a car of any type isn’t free from costs of course!) London is already incredibly navigable without a car, I really wish my city was more like that.
@@rainbowevil It just proves that its not about emissions and public health which is the excuse he uses for it, its just another money grab to help fund his mismanagement of TFL etc.
Genius! Astonishingly it seems most people still haven’t figured ULEZ out and think if their car is “compliant” it’s problem over. Well DUH what do you think he’s going to do next. Compliant is whatever they say it is.
You got it right, I am not in the UK, but politicians love to raise the bar, so what is good and compliant today, may not be that tomorrow or next week. Yes, I saw politicians be all on "Get diesel, it is environmentally friendly" then 3 years later. "Oh no it pollutes so much, tax it to hell!" Soon I bet the beloved EV's are next on the same chopping block.
Jordan Peterson (whether you like the guy or not) described the totalitarian tiptoe on the Joe rogan show beautifully a few years ago. They get away with it every time.
That's what I said to one of my friend as they recently bought a petrol car from diesel and they said they have ulez compliant car now but I said what guarantee is there that your new petrol car will be ulez compliment by let's say end of 2024, even a prius might not be comment by then this isn't the solution to this nonsense of ulez.
@@CMDRSweeper Diesels were encouraged because they are more fuel efficient, you can travel further on the same amount of fuel and therefor because you are using less fuel you are producing less CO2 emissions (greenhouse gas, global warming etc etc). Diesels however produce huge amounts of NOx which is a toxic gas and is harmful to humans and that's why they trying to get rid of them now.
Another new loophole is just to reject the fine as it's based on anpr and anpr can't be used as evidence anymore due to 1.7 million cloned number plates in the UK, so it's not really a loophole but a legal remedy.
there was a ruling recently (soz I don't have the data) that fines via cameras are non valid...... I'm looking forward to claiming back £180 from Birmingham Council....
I don't know how else to get my message across. I am a ventilation engineer and my area is the whole of the South East of England. The worst polluted place on my patch is Kensington and Chelsea where they have supposedly been protected by the congestion charge since the early 2000s and the ULEZ from it's inception. Most places have new filters every 12 months but there it is every 6 months and the filters are black every time. In the outer boroughs like Bromley or Havering they are only grey after a year. The Zones have no effect on pollution whatsoever. I agree that pollution needs dealing with but they don't have any working solution yet. Also people in the Zone pay for it whether they drive or not. Maintenance people like me pass the charge on to customers all the time.
Keep sending them SAR for copies of all the videos and photos they have on you. Then send the order that the data be deleted. Also demand the names of the companies or people who have bought the data off them. You can then repeat the process with them.
@@diannawhyte9595 Sorry wrong thread. The Khan bit is people registering their vehicles with Khan as the register keeper. Then all fines are sent to him, and he has to identify the driver. Clearly he's not going to know who the driver is, so he takes the fine. Now if you do that, say and you are clearly black, white or chinese, or female, all you have to do is wear a Khan mask. Then when the look at the video, or your brief shows it to the court, with you sitting their saying nothing as is your right, the other side looks very stupid.
Loving this bit of knowledge. By the way i was working on a job last week , with other trades men , and one of the trades person had a Renault diesel van, 23 plate. Makes me think why on earth are they still making diesel vehicles, with everything that’s going on now.😮
I'd love to see the air polution statistics from the start of the first lockdown. That's as close to a car free set of data that could be collected. They always love to boast of their "scappage" schemes but completly miss the simple face that £2000 off a £20,000 new car doesn't make it remotely close to affordable to most drivers. If people could afford £18,000 for a car, they probably wouldn't be driving around in a £500 banger in the first place.
Human emissions went down 25% during lockdown. It had an effect on the atmosphere of less than 0.2%. In other words, 99% of co2 in the atmosphere..does NOT come from humans. Source: NOAA co2 global monitoring station Hawaii
@@FullFact548 They did for the 2008/9 scrappage scheme. It was only available for px on new cars. Although many dealerships matched the deals unofficially on recent used vehicles.
@@FullFact548 Nice name. Also I thought that the issue was carbon dioxide not "nitrogen dioxide" I would suggest not trying to implement nitrogen emission cuts on farmers then since "Reductions in transportation sector emissions are largely responsible for the NO2 anomalies" no need to cut back on meat then right? -Fact checked by... Research funded by... Anyway, just buy my patented "eco-friendly" government subsidised and enforced items. Gov: Why global lockdown was a good thing. Why inflation is actually good. How to deal with the Cost of Living crisis. Why you shouldn't ask for a pay rise. How to deal with stress and move on in life. How humans emit co2 by breathing. Why you're morally obligated to not procreate.
@@FullFact548 Really really interesting stuff there, could you point me to some peer reviewed literature so I can look further into the details? Also where does the estimated 8 million figure come from? Really surprised farm animals have been kept around this long considering the "threat" they pose. Recent news is that a bill in the EU has passed allowing Dutch gov to forcibly make Dutch farmers to sell their farm land to meet the emission targets. Also the "voluntary" option is they will buy it at 120% market value but you have to promise to not operate farms elsewhere in Netherlands or EU. Very interesting, they could have just payed them to not farm so they aren't forced to sell. Hard not to see it as a land grab whilst it's been well known the Dutch gov has been struggling for land to build housing...
I might be wrong but I don’t think they will go for road charging just yet. If they go too fast it will cause a huge stir and they will have non payment trouble (until digital ID anyway). My bet is they tighten the ULEZ standards a few times first to condition the public into accepting being charged to drive on their own roads.
1.Scotland’s current position This research project draws together Scottish, UK and international examples and baseline evidence on the concept of ‘20 minute neighbourhoods’, and how it can be best translated in a Scottish context. The project identifies areas of good practice, and takes account of our geography, demography, economy, governance and relevant policy drivers to inform the translation of the concept. The Scottish Government defines a 20 minute neighbourhood as: ‘where people can meet their needs within a 20 minute walk from their house - enabling people to live better, healthier lives and supporting our net zero ambitions.’ 2 The project had two main aims: 1. To consider the ambition for 20 minute neighbourhoods in Scotland, taking account of the differing settlement patterns across the country, and to highlight interventions that would support delivery of the concept, supported by findings from a baseline analysis 2. To analyse international evidence of the success of interventions to achieve these ambitions, including identifying specific success factors, place-making impacts, barriers to success, regulatory frameworks, funding mechanisms and stakeholder engagement and buy-in. The Scottish policy context is defined in section 1.1, while the details of the definition of a 20 minute neighbourhood and the desired outcomes are explained in section 1.2. The baseline methodology and results are set out in sections 1.3 and 1.4. Section 2 presents the evidence from UK and international case studies. Feedback from a range of stakeholders informed the subsequent suggested ambitions and recommendations for implementation, see organisations listed in Appendix C. ...... !!!
That's why they were desperate to keep the recent global "health emergancy" going as long as possible because they needed more time to phase in their social credit system (health passport). Also note suddenly it's a "climate crisis" this phrase has replaced the previous "health crisis". Before 2020 it was never called "climate crisis" but since the first "crisis" Didn't last long enough they've had to make another one to justify totalitarianism.
Even if your current car is ULEZ compliant, they will forever raise the bar so that one day it won't be. Then there'll be the push for EVs only in London. I also still think it's hypocritical to allow people to pollute as long as they pay. WTF!
In Aberdeen there's not a fee, but a fine of £60 or £30 if paid within 14 days for non compliant vehicles, this comes into place in June, how can a council extort money like this?
As far as I'm concerned if I have paid vehicle tax/road tax I've paid to use His majesty's roads. If a town or an area of a town is going to implement road charging to collect money from visitors or people passing thru their areas then when people from that or those areas leave their areas they must pay to leave them. How would all the schemes affect the travel industry. In particular areas such as Cornwall and Wales who rely quite a bit on tourism? Not been clearly thought thru like the 15 minute prisons, oops sorry, cities has it?
Unfortunately I think it has been very well planned. ULEZ and 15 minute cities are one and the same thing. Clean air zone cameras essentially geofence an entire area, the standards can then tighten until the public is priced out of private transport. There’s your 15 minute city.
@@chevchelios8582 Then what happens to the car/motorcycle industry? In the UK governments have relied on tax from vehicle tax, petrol tax and tax on anything related to vehicles having VAT. When that dwindles where will that money come from?
Unfortunately our Marxist overlords in Wales couldn't care less about business and tourism. They've already started charging a tourist tax and will implement blanket 20mph speed limits instead of 30mph in September despite massive opposition. They've also started looking at road pricing per mile. I'm afraid this is being implemented everywhere in the UK under different names and no matter what the public thinks the people pulling the strings in the background aren't listening.
@@simonchilli2088 Those industries will largley disappear and everyone will lose their jobs. The only cars will available will cost a million or so to buy be made in tiny numbers and only be for the billinaire elities and MPs. That's the plan.
This is what we need to do: 1) look into the rules of what we can or cannot do legally to run for Mayor of London. 2) Crowdfund to raise money for this if legal to do so. 3) Find a suitable candidate to stand as mayor with the correct policies and get voted in someone who will end the war on motorists
Engaging in the 'democratic process' is what got you into this mess in the first place. One definition of insanity is to repeat the same actions and expecting a different result. 'Suitable person', you're having a laugh...
you are ABSOLUTLY NAIVE - You think voting makes any difference? lol - You can only get in IF you're in The Club... and this ultimately leads to involvement with 'young children'. That's why Child-line with Ester Rantzen was created - YOU gave YOUR money to the 1000's of kiddie fiddlers in public office - and the BBC for years . Isn't that right Ted the Grocer?
5:03 and dont forget mould in our homes ESPECIALLY now that many cannot afford to heat their homes properly during winter. Currently investigqting this further and going to approach some media outlets that might run with it. I asked TfL for data to back up the ULEZ... was met with radio silence.
Sadiq Khan *won’t* be able to go around to the owner of that car’s house, because thanks to the Data Protection Act, he won’t be able to see the previous keeper’s address on his new logbook! 😆
I was looking for a new insurance quote as mine was nearing renewal, and I notice my car insurance would have nearly doubled (£344 up to £677)with 17years no claims if some lowlife piece of crap hadn't have stolen my vehicle. Motorists are being hit from every angle and priced off the roads.
Even if the accident or theft is not your fault the Insurence company’s will still increase your premium as your classed as A Risk in their world... It’s another one of life’s cons.... 😡
Shop around. Another insurer may offer you a discounted rate for "new business". Do it all the time.. Usually stay with current insurer I'd the following years quote is within a tenner not worth moving... .. Comparison websites really help speed up that process....
@@markrainford1219 No. They will try and say it is but it won't be a correctly formatted invoice, according to the legal description of an invoice. AS you've never agreed to or signed a contract, how can they invoice you. You will also require an invoice for HMRC, so if they refuse they are inciting you into tax fraud. I've beaten parking companies twice until a crooked magistrate broke the law and judged against me. Problem is the whole system is corrupt.
@@BillCooper1776 hmm skeptical. If we ask for an invoice claiming we've not contracted to or for whatever fine. The enforcement agency will just site the relevant law, statute, regulation that gives them the "authority" to issue said fine?
According to the RAC there is 691,559 cars in outer london which are registered before 2015, so if we take the £110 million for scrapping those cars that means that each car gets approx £159 per vehicle.
Not to mention it's not green to scrap perfectly working vehicles that are 8 years old. Extremely wasteful. Another thing is consumer goods made to fail and be impossible to repair creating E-waste millions of tons of it. One of the biggest pollutants now. No eco warriors going after that through? Wonder why?
I would never condone this but have heard that using a large power water pistol filled with either paint or shamefully a oil water petrol accelerant mix which is then ignited would render the cameras useless, works. Of course you would have to be fully face masked with a balaclava and able to move quickly out of the vicinity.
Kathy Hopkins made a video on a cheap product used to permanently disable those cameras. If enough people do it, they won't have the money to replace them. Sabotage and resistance.
If your vehicle has a licence plate and you hold a driving licence, that is your consent given.. This is where people need to understand law. Not legislation. Those two items are your contract with dvla and you must follow their rules and regulations
@H you have the rite to request your images captured by all cctv if you are in public.. you write to the place in question and request your data be deleted each time. But in reality, who is going todo that ? If your in a vehicle and its road traffic cameras then your driving licence is your contract to abide by dvla rules and regulations. It's not a licence of competence for using the road like people think, People do not read the small print, nor do they educate themselves legally. The public are views as plebs, its why many rules and regulations were written in Latin, most could not understand it. Now legislation is confused as law, but its not. Laws apply equally to everyone. Laws do not give any people or groups special privileges.
@@evelghostrider If this is the case, surely there is a tech wizard out there that can set an app of some sort up. All cameras locations are put on a map, everytime your car/phone passes one it automatically pings off an email requesting your images. Must be do able surely?
The police read the rear number plate, but the ULEZZ reads the front plate, so having a false front number plate works aswell, just hope the police do not spot it. I like this new idea, a legal way to avoid paying.
BRiNO. It was all pretend . If we're to truly be out of the EU. Then all EU based law made in the last 40years would have to be re made/repealed. Some will be. But it will take another 40 years to legally unwind from the EU shackles ..
If mileage charging is ever introduced, would it be possible to do as Geoff said, register the car to the PM or hated Minister or Mayor, abandon the vehicle, with others on a London Bridge of Motorway etc and watch the carnage..?
Many petrol cars prior to Euro 4 may still be compliant. I have a 2001 Saab 93 2.0SE Turbo that's fine. It's down to your NOx emissions. TfL limit is 0.08g/km, my 93 comes in at 0.01g/km. The details should be on your Registration doc. Regarding bikes, I believe the figure is 0.15g/km most bikes should be compliant too. If it's not on your reg doc, check with the manufacturer. Failing that, there's several garages that will do it. Think the charge is around £160. You should get a Certificate of Conformity and then the vehicle has to be registered with TfL. I'll be doing this with my 30 year old Triumph Thunderbird 900 (when it finally gets repaired!).
My 03 mini cooper s is apparently compliant too. Thou haven't checked this officially yet. .. I've ust bought a motor bi-cycle and all bikes are charged 100£s for road tax. There's no emissions data on my motor bi-cycle log book. I will double check again....
My guzzi is euro 3 compliant, but khan's muppets charge me the same cost as a car ? Why should I pay extra to gave it declared compliant, I bought the bloody thing new because of its low emissions, yet I could buy an old brit thing that spits out oil and pollution and its e exempt Yet front gardens are still being ripped out to park more fatmobiles that will only do short polluting journeys
If it was about pollution then the MOT emissions tests would be tightened, all cars that have an MOT will have had their emissions tested and are legal to drive anywhere in the country. It is all about filling TfL coffers with fines. Remember that cars over 40 years old will be exempt and their emissions will be very high.
I agree , if Everyone Refuses to pay. I don’t think they would ever be able to contend with the mass Paperwork. Khan is a Normal Politician attacking those Who can Not fight Back.
I remember in the 1800’s and early 1900’s when the Royal family was appalled to find out that 50 per cent of children in London didn’t make it to adult hood because of the industrial smoke and constant smog. Lung disease was very common. So they sent the teenagers to Crimea, India, Africa, France and Germany with guns, in uniforms to help with their breathing. Because we all know the leaders of Britain have ALWAYS been concerned about the ‘lungs’ of the citizens, which is why they closed ALL the mines, the Royal Family and Downing Street were in tears about the “poor lungs” of the workers.
A nonsense comment and if you believe it then you should know the Royal Family has no power of direction on such matters. It would be the UK Parliament that has been democratically elected under universal suffrage since 1918 with a more limited voting system since previously.
All decisions by the London Mayor are vetted and approved by the London Assembly, That's 25 members. So ULEZ is not the fault of 1 man, at all. Yes, it hits some poor people with vehicles but only 5% of cars are not ULEZ compliant anyway ! What's more important ? The needs of a small percentage of drivers with old cars or the health of people living in cities including newborns ? I think I know the answer !!
Spot on. Do anything you can to screw up these schemes and I mean anything! Keep it going Geoff nice to see the channel growing. Censor tube wont like that but we do! My missus runs a compliant hybrid CHR and I run a very none compliant 2002 D4D Rav 4 which I love ! Manchester's scheme is on hold at present but should be scrapped Burnham is a twat!
If you are not named on the v5 and or the insurance address is not the same, the insurance company will end or invalidate your insurance. I noticed this year a well known insurance company wanted a copy of the V5, a live MOT certificate, a copy of your drving licence, a copy of your UKGateway digital driving licence showing any points, else they not insuring you.
Parliament has absolute sovereignty and is supreme over all other government institutions, means that the Government could end this additional disaster at the "blink of an eye" but it lacks the resolve to do so.
If 9 out of 10 cars in outer London are already ULEZ compliant what difference will ULEZ make? How is the air being polluted by cars if 90% of them are already compliant?
Unfortunately this won’t work. For speeding fines if they get no response from the registered keeper they check the insurance database and send a notice of intended prosecution to the person who has insured the car asking who the driver was. If the information is provided they prosecute the driver for speeding. If not they prosecute the insured person for failing to Identify the driver which is punishable by a fine and 6 penalty points. They will no doubt follow the same process for failure to pay the ULEZ charge.
@@s4owner The NIP must be served on the registered keeper within 14 days. Once that is done any other person can be required to provide information leading to the identity of the driver.
It's motor fraud buddy and it would not work. When you sign a V5C form there's a declaration on it that you sign to inform the DVLA that the information provided in the document is accurate. If the DVLA are informed by the nominated person that he did not agree to take ownership of the vehicle then the previous owner is going to get charged with a crime. I guarantee this didn't happen. It's just a tabloid story. This also isn't a new and novel idea. It's used by Fraudulent Taxi companies quite commonly and it does get investigated by the DVLA.
I wonder if the public who live in Greater London which used to be in Surrey, Kent, Middx etc would want their council to remove their borough out of Greater London? Maybe a pile should be done on this? Which would give less powers over the public and less moneys to TFL and running London that we may want to all distance our selfs from now. How councils would respond to this question?
Is there something in the law where you need the owner/registered keeper's permission to drive the vehicle? Maybe not so much from an insurance perspective but is it not taking the vehicle without consent once it is gifted? I'm very lucky in the fact I never have to go to london
These laws will get to your neck of the woods eventually and probably sooner than later if people do not rebel and reject this authoritarian nonsense. It also does not affect me either because although living in London, I do not drive.
@@wideyxyz2271 This is EXACTLY why we've seen identity politics pushed down our throats with constant race,gender,orientation baiting for the last 10 years or so. To divide us up as much as possible so they'll be little or no organised resistance to this tyranny.
It will come to all "cities". I don't live near a city but the large town nearby has just inexplicably, and without any consultation, announced its to "apply to become a city". ??
Yep you need a V8 with increased ground clearance and four wheel drive because those wet leaves are a safety hazard! Your car isn't polluting, it's the 1.6 petrol some retiree drives a few miles a week to go to the shops....
@@khalidacosta7133 How the fcuk do you know where he lives and why he needs an off road capable vehicle? Do you have a crystal ball? Do you understand the concept of 4WD and high and low ratios and how to use them in snow and ice conditions and on steep slopes terrain? No I dont think you do plus you dont know where the guy lives so ten out of ten for stupid sarcastic comment.
There's a thing I saw on RUclips about how a guy bought a secrecy screen for a laptop, cut it to fit his number plate and showed how cameras can't read your number plate from above, although it was in America it still seems like a good idea
If you watch the film: inside man with Clive Owen. That film reveals another way that one could obfuscate the cameras vision. .. I'm not saying anymore....
I heard many years ago that spraying the number plates with HAIR SPRAY works well to combat cameras. I don't know how many coats were needed but anything is worth a try.
Hi Geoff, a friend of mine suggested another genius idea. Apparently heritage vehicles (anything over 25 years old) are all ULEZ exempt. They also escape VED and have really cheap insurance. Interestingly, in case anyone wanted to set up a central London bus Co this would include old Route Masters.
It’s actually over 40 years old, and yes they are ULEZ exempt as well as MOT exempt. However, unless someone understands the responsibility of driving very old cars and has the ability to self maintain and regularly self examine and maintain and repair these cars, they are not a viable substitute just to avoid the ULEZ fine. Most modern car owners would give up after a few weeks. Most don’t have power steering, air conditioning, certainly no or at best rudimentary crumple zones, no air bags and all cars of that age will suffer from rust either at present or in the future. I run classic cars myself, and although I don’t have a problem doing so, I’m very aware that 99.9% of the general public wouldn’t be capable of living with such vehicles.
@@daol4258 with the speed of traffic in London air bags , crumple zones, lack of seat belts is pretty irrelevant. And a 40 year old Volvo is pretty well.bullet proof -they don't call them tanks for nothing .
This is joke... I drove straight to Hyde park in April going back a few years in my 1973 Citroën which just happens to be exempt from all that ulez bollocks because it's too old 🤣
No it's not, the car owner has to have the car registered disabled on the log book and to get that you have to be getting pip entitlement on the higher rate mobility....
Bloody good idea! You didn't mention the other trick that lots of people are doing. A family member started getting parking fines, driving in bus lanes etc and when she looked at the photographs, its wasn't her car - someone had cloned her number plates. It was a much older Honda compared to hers. I am pissed off because she asked me to help dispute the violations, as English is not her first language. I wish the guy had looked at the cars of the Mayor's retinue and cloned their number plates. Contacting the Met seems to make little difference.
Just buy a 40 plus year old car .Free road tax no ULEZ charges. On the day the ULEZ comes into power, any car built before 1 January 1980 will be unaffected by the new rules, and tax-exempt vehicles will be excluded on a rolling annual basis
Surely not a “genius” plan! When you tax the car with the “new owner/keeper” part of the V5 surely you become the new keeper!? 😂 or if you add another person as the new keeper and then tax it, you won’t be able to tax it again in future…. DOH! 😂
Just found this article..." How much money did ULEZ make in 2022? · Through data obtained via a freedom of information request, the BBC has found ULEZ generated £224,633,003 in 2022, an average of £18.7m a month. Money came in through two streams: daily charges and PCNs. Any vehicle driven within the zone must meet ULEZ emission standards, or pay a £12.50 daily charge." That works out at over 17 million cars still driving in the ulez zones. How does that help the air in London???
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
There is no climate crisis, it is simply a UN plot to force world Communism on us all.
I’ve pinned this comment. Just in case. Wink wink
Indeed the YT MindCrime patrol would likely nuke it
Communitarianism, communism controlled by fascist billionaires.
We know, but we do nothing about it.
Yes but it's worse than communism! Try technocratic transhuman pedo death cult!
You don’t need a LOOP HOLE, EVERYONE JUST NEEDS TO REFUSE TO PAY IT.
Like Birmingham
Absolutely agree 💯
Totally 100% agree !!!
Absolutely! Coming expansion of ULEZ in London is a great test on how far people can go for their freedom and how many of us. This expansion is clearly “an offer” but not “an order”. There is no even legal basis under it, never mind lawful. It is an offer to pay for “something” and threats for not agreeing on ”the offer”. This is clearly a daylight robbery in 21st century style. Mass rejection of ”the offer” and non-compliance would send a massive signal to THEM - We are the people are not the slaves; Keep your hands off us and our future.
Would People be able to show who is the master, like people of Birmingham did? I very much hope so.
If everyone refuse’s to pay then it clearly isn’t in the public interest and no one should be prosecuted
Forget loopholes. Mass non-compliance is the only way to beat it
It worked with the poll tax
Or join the Robin Hood Gang and "attend to" the cameras. If thousands showed the courage they do the problems would be "removed" in quick time.
@@wyattfamily8997Are you endorsing criminal behaviour, like Greenpeace did the other week?
@@alfsmith4936It is your moral duty to resist unjust laws.
Agreed
We don't need a loophole, we just need en masse civil disobedience, if EVERYONE refuses to pay it and any associated fines will just bury TFL in paperwork.
Lol 😂
We needed massive civil disobedience when they were forcing people to wearing face nappies and constant lockdowns yet the sheep complied. Its too late for disobedience
paulallaker8450 - what ! . . . "Burying TFL in paperwork ???!
What a nasty horrible thing to do 😲
I like it ..🤪
Funny. When the just stop oil people are disobedient, motorists make them out to be no better than terrorists.
exactly, apparently there was something like this introduced in brimingham and nobody paid so they stopped enforcing it lol
Just stop paying they are they are elected to serve not dictate
The stupid thing is if Khan was really worried about people's health he should close all the fast food outlets.
More people have been victims of knife crime and mass immigration than car emissions.
And maybe stop corruption in the met and stop young people stabbing the shit outta each other !
@Max Black
What demographic is to blame for that? I'm fed up with other communities' problems being laid at the door of the white man all the time.
And stop using his Rang Rover and lead buy example and ride a bike 🚲 like Boris did when he was mayor but then people liked Boris 😂 I don't think Khan we ould dare ride a 🚲 to work .
@@josephborg5938 OMG just picturing Boris wobbling to work on his bike, and Khan in an armoured motorcade. Speaks volumes doesn't it.
Forget loopholes, just say No and stop the tyranny
Well Said
This would be an “equal venture,” an article on the SCIP published by The Jerusalem Post in March asserts that New York’s state government will be funding the entire $2 million
Bob Langer The Coronavirus "Common Denominator" Tied To Charles Lieber & Israel's NY "Smart Cities“
"As technology advancesTied Innovation Partnership,” Dr. Ami Applebaum - chairman of the Israel Innovation Authority and Chief Scientists of the Israel’s Economy Ministry - stated the following and touches every facet of our daily lives, the future of Smart Cities is just around the corner and highly depends to [sic] new and innovative technologies. This collaboration between the ESD (Empire State Development of New York State) and the Israel Innovation Authority, facilitated by our Americas Operations desk and the Ministry of Economy, Foreign Trade Administration (FTA), headed by Mr. Inon Elroy, Economic Minister to North America, will provide startups an opportunity for pilot validation sites to address the strategic concerns of both States such as cybersecurity, supply chain, energy, health, transportation, wastewater, water, civic engagement, parks, public works, and safety.”
The partnership specifically called for the establishment of five “Smart Cities” in Regional Economic Development Council (REDC) regions in New York that would interact with “test bed sites” created in Israel. This means that this “smart city” partnership only involves the creation of smart cities in New York, not Israel, but gives Israeli companies a major role in designing these five New York smart cities.
Though the press release from last year claims project, giving $1 million to the Israel Innovation Authority and $1 million to Israeli companies. The New York government website, however, currently states that the $2 million partnership involves New York state giving $1 million exclusively to New York-based companies and the Israel Innovation Authority giving additional $1 million exclusively for Israeli companies seeking to develop New York-based projects. .... Witney Webb !!!
Exactly! I do not comply 👍
Get a few thousand people to wander round London tearing down cameras. Make sure to cost them more than they'll ever get from ulez charges.
Exactly, people play into the game which only brings it forth quicker. Stop playing their new rules ffs.
As others have said if everyone refused to pay, this would fall apart in weeks.
Wrong. There would be an order to drain their bank account.
@@rogerphelps9939Cash is king stand against card transactions anything digital is evil and wrong the government can control weather or not your family eats because they have control of your funds however physical cash you'll have to pry from my dead body
Not enough leverage from a minority group. Despite the incorrect propaganda, over 90% of vehicles driven in the Ulez are exempt. Of those that are not, only a small percentage fail to pay the fee and of those, only a tiny percent fail to pay the penalty charge. This means they are an easy target for the courts and bailifs.
Well in Australia if you don't pay your fines they just suspend your licence until the fine has been payed, they will find away to make you pay
Doesnt need to be everyone, im tax free since 2021. Cowards deserve to live in their little world of tyranny
In South Africa, they set up the same and spent millions doing it. They just don't pay it. The only thing you can do is not pay it in protest and If all of London does it, they won't have the money to enforce it...
Destroying t he cameras is the more sensible way . A group like ANONYMOUS should be doing this and keep doing it
@@Interdiction That's illegal. Just leave a temporary sign, blocking the camera. By accident of course.
Anonymous are shills designed to make you think people are making positive change so you feel like you don't need to yourself. Quite ingenious really.
@@Interdiction Look up the Bladerunners
@@fredmercury1314Just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's wrong or immoral.
The answer is very simple, everyone ignore it. Throw away any letters, ignore any communication. If millions of people did this it could not be viable.
Or write across it that you do not consent or wish to contract with this unlawful scheme of extortion and they must cease and desist any further unlawful demands, keep a copy for your records and post the original back to them.
It's exactly what needs to happen to UKEZ, health passports any social credit system 15 min cities and the rest of what they have planned
You're just creating a - Feeding-Frenzy for bailiffs.
@@FullFact548 No it is not lawful unless you contract to it and/or give your consent.
@@coolbreez773 you're just creating a slave society!
Great Britain belongs to the people, not a few politicians!
London isn't a part of UK. Just Google for the answer's.
No, it does not and never has.
Not in this timeline. Here, it's the opposite. Wish I was in your timeline
NONE of these ULEZ roads are what they claim,and should be referred to being "Scam Zones"because that's what they are.
Vehicles that are "non compliant" (some arbitrary made up standard)can still use these roads,so pollution levels will be no different.
The only change will be the drivers being made to pay for exactly the same thing they were doing previously.
It's a scam,and yet nobody seems interested in confronting Khan with this fact.
In public when confronted he walx away and his security ushers people away if they get too close.
It's worse than a scam. It's actual fascism. This is Hitler's wet dream and that is no exaggeration. Klaus Schwabb has learned from Hitler's mistakes, and he's infiltrated every government, corporation and the media. There is no Churchill to fight against this new wave of Nazism. Everyone is accepting it instead and worshipping its image.
Nobody seems to confront the issue with Khan??? Where have you been ?? There have been MASSIVE protests in London for several weekends - MPs in the House have raged about it all, protests everywhere ... Wake Up ‼️
I am sure millions of us would be happy to do the honours and confront him with this hard fact.
@@user-zz9gn2dc3l What people in the whole of ULEZ land need to do is come up with an independent to stand as mayor. What they don't want to do is vote for him again!! I'm guessing people in outer London areas that don't consider themselves as living in London as they are in Kent, Essex or Surrey etc towns that have been merged into London to pay the bills didn't realise what it meant for them. Or they probably thought it won't affect them.
I have an old Ford Galaxy diesel ..... it runs perfectly, and always passes it's MOT with ease. I registered the car to my brother a few years ago when the ULEZ zones started. It's accrued thousands of ULEZ notifications and fines. I'm waiting for them to come and try to collect the fines. My brother died 6 years ago, so good luck with that. But this one registering it in Khan's name seems an even better idea
Simply brilliant, but I’m sorry for your loss (and your brothers unfortunate debt)
@@GeoffBuysCars Thank you. Obviously not something anyone would want to happen, but I know he would have approved 100% I was just going to register the car in a ficticious name, but saw the opportunity ...... but the idea is the same .....
@@garyfromlondon Mind if I make this into a funny anonymous video?
@@GeoffBuysCars no problem, it could give some interesting viewing
What’s stoping sadiq khan from scrapping the car and pocketing the cash if he’s now the registered owner?
For me the worst issue I have with this ULEZ is that these vehicles complied with the regulations at the time of manufacture. Some of us buy vehicles with the intention of keeping them for a long time. Also, its possible to retrofit filters to reduce pollution.
Pollution from vehicles is NOT a problem just like CO2 is not a problem. They use all these things as an excuse and as a trojan horse.
@user-tq1qd3iu2t Is it really a trojan house though diesel emissions are very toxic the same way we stopped using leaded fuel, maybe city centers aren't really the place for heavy diesel exhaust emissions. Maybe we do need to start moving with the times and ditch dirty diesel
It's called moving the goalposts.... Cheap and easy revenue stream from the lazy and bone idle thicko's in government.
This wouldnt happen in France - They just wreck the place if the government do stuff like this !
Exactly... British people moan and then do little else
I've lived in France for nearly twenty years and for your information every large city in France has a similar system, but nobody rioted ! Why ? Because the French are more intelligent than the English.
@@brianferguson7840 Stop walking round with blinkers on you dopey goofball. Shithole France is rioting all the time...zzz
@@brianferguson7840the french intelligent lol u must be a moron
@@brianferguson7840 They aren't if they accepted this as it is not founded in any real science and no one has rioted in the UK so what are you on about?
the guy sending the DVLA the paper slip off the vehicle v5 document and putting Sadiq Khan, as the new registered owner of the vehicle is classic, love it.
Signing the V5 document over - only relates to the NUMBER PLATE.
Please see my comment explaining my understanding of the situation.
.
But you are signing a declaration on the V5 document. That declaration is confirmation that you are telling the truth. If you are not its Motor Fraud. Check out the blackbelt barrister who has just covered this idea.
Yeah but if I were the mayor I'd sell every car to scrap the day I got a new keeper slip. Profit AND get cars off the road. Win win.
Non payment of fines is obviously the real answer. The problem is getting all drivers to unite in one cause, everybody needs to stop paying the fines.
They will just do like Australia if you don't pay your fines your licence goes under FINES SUSPENSION and you got no licence at all until the fine is payed and only then your LICENCE SUSPENSION is lifted, non payment of the fines won't change a thing they will make sure of it
My car is gender car fluent and identifies as a ulez compliant vehicle for the rest of its mechanical life.
That works too.
Awesome one!!
@@dinkydaz6711 it's got nothing to do with religion. There are corrupt individuals in every religion
Love that comment!
🤣 I might have to use this 🤔My car identifies as a pushbike...was born in the wrong body...it's preferred pronoun is compliant 😂
If I lived in London I wouldn’t pay this TAX . I was a POLL TAX protester and didn’t pay ( even after bailiffs turned up ) and Maggie Thatcher was out in 6 months . Unite everyone 👍
Lot of good that did, we ended up with Council Tax anyway, and now pay more than we would have done, doh.
I was taken to Court for non payment of Poll Tax.....Judge wiped out the Debt !
@@settertwo all that does is put the burden on everyone else to pay for things that you think you're entitled to for free, no doubt you vote Tory
If I lived in London bla blah.... But u don't and thus don't have to prove Yr empty words. Give us a break!
Refuse to pay stand firm on this total rip off don't pay, there skint now all stand together 😊
as an American, i feel bad for Londoners who have go through this
If your American you have a lot more on your plate than any londoner so don't worry about them. FJB
NYC are attempting to do the same thing as London : my message to New Yorkers , and the people/ drivers of America is that it won’t stop there . Idiot politicians don’t know when to stop screwing us over . Beware America and don’t follow London . Don’t let it happen
What does being American have to do with having empathy towards those suffering under the creeping totalitarianism? No one in the western world is free from it. We are all one against the globalists. It simply has variations in its manifestation.
Don’t think you’re getting away with it…….they’re starting in New York right now
@@FA57_BDYim not in NY LOL, besides its for "congestion"
Why doesn't he tackle the toxic air in the underground? If cars at one seventh of the level of the tube, the tube is killing thousands.
Ban vegetarians from using the tube or impose a flatulence scale of fines on the commuters.
Inept maintenance on the ventilation. 100% incompetence on behalf of the local "government". Another fine example of children trying to be rulers.
@@Squidgy55 How dare you criticise children....
I was on the tube the other day and it really stank so that when this guy farted people thanked him for the fresh air.
@@jasonking1284 Yes, that was unjustified. I should have called them what they are. Clowns, bought and paid for.
Stop complying and don't pay it, if enough do this it all falls down just like Birmingham🤷♂️
It got stopped in Birmingham?
@@ln5747 Almost 70,000 wiped off.
@@kevinwilding7825 70k what?
@@ln5747 Fines
@@pmullen4491
Ha ha, bet Birmingham City Council hasn't scrapped the scheme though😂😂
There seems to be a big push to get people to accept without question, new technologies and ditch what they have formerly been using for years.
As an analogy, look at vinyl records, cassette tape, MiniDisc and CD's. All of those technologies were milked for years, and then we were told that THIS or THAT are the next thing, so we should get rid of them.
The EV future is highly questionable, because the charging infrastructure is nowhere near ready.
It is also worse for the environment. Where do they think the electricity comes from-->the magical outlet?
Yes, so that the government can control us with their technology
It's very funny, but looking for loopholes is acceptance of the rule. Protest this outside your MPs and Kahn's houses. If they make life uncomfortable for us then we make it worse for them.
In political philosophy, the phrase 'consent of the governed' refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power, is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised.
In a democracy, politicians take their orders from the majority, if they refuse to seek consent - they should be sacked. If they don't get sacked, legal action should be taken. If legal action is not possible - revolution is required to purge the corruption.
Brilliant
We had an opportunity to scrap ULEZ in the last mayoral election
The system can't cope if everyone ignored fines or letters 😅
Iv been doing this my whole life and county court and tv licence didn't pay a penny in council tax till I was 50 I'm 51... also stat declaration magestrates court allows you to wipe all fines and licence points away if you didn't know about proceedings so get letter ignore it get court day ignore it get convicted in your absence call or amend magestrates claim ignorance to proceedings they have to stat declaration your convicti9n away as you didn't get a chance to defend your self I did it with speeding offences and many other cases deedpoll name change again change name walk away I don't pay imaginary debts
Great video, anything that can be used to inconvenience Khan & TFL definitely gets a thumbs up from me. I used to own a transport business & had two depots based in Battersea, West London & Maidenhead, Berks. All my vehicles (22 of them) were in & out of C Charge zone pretty much every day. All of these vehicles however were registered to a Regus accommodation address in Edinburgh & were legally out of reach to any enforcement agents looking to recover C Charge fines & parking fines. Did this for 12 years & never paid a single fine in all that time despite racking up thousands of pounds of them. All perfectly legally too. I know of 3 other hauliers who now have their vehicles registered elsewhere too for that exact same reason, two in Schipol, Holland & one in Dublin. It doesn't stop you getting the fines but it does stop enforcement agents pursuing you for non payment - you just deny receiving any notice of enforcement letters. Result.
I do love that he has to identify the driver in the case of a fine.
And if he fails to do so he is responsible for paying the fine!
@@pauls3075 exactly! Now what the person who registered with him is make sure someone else is driving. For example he is on a flight at the time of the offence. The reason is khan will say the driver was the donor. But with proof he is in the air, khan has perverted the course of justice
There was an old Columbo episode where someone wore a mask that was a photo of someone else's face.
☝☝
@@fredmercury1314 yes! Then you pass the mask to someone else to repeat and rinse.
As a repeat offender his fines should rapidly increase
@@fredmercury1314
Wear a Sadiq Khant mask.
When I bought my hybrid car, road tax was £0. Now the road tax on the car is £145 and have to pay congestion charge. Which is so unfair cos I sold my perfectly good diesel car to avoid road tax and congestion. Now I'm hearing tax per mile
Just remember we don't really live in a democracy we just get to vote for another dictator
Its way over time that people are just waking JP to this 😬😬😬
We get to vote for one of "their" dictator puppets owned and controlled by them, it's like choosing between a dog sh*t, cat sh*t and rat sh*t sandwich and then being told "well you chose it".
One of our cars is registered in my dad's name at his old address (I incorrectly said "my car" initially). He died over 20 years ago. As far as I'm concerned, if it's OK for them to use underhand tactics to extract more money from us then it's perfectly OK for us to use underhand tactics to protect ourselves. People, always remember that the roads do NOT belong to the government and councils to be used as a cash cow, they are PUBLIC roads.
As for pollution, scientists proved many years ago that brake dust is one of the biggest problems for people with asthma - yet thanks to congestion, which is often caused by removing available roads to use as bus lanes etc - there is MORE brake dust in the air than ever before. So "traffic calming" schemes etc. are probably at least partly responsible for the increase in children with asthma. This is one of the reasons I don't believe the "clean air" bollox.
Compounded by non-compliant gas guzzlers continuing to poison the air at £12.50/day ULEZ charge.
Not least that 'traffic calming' increases local emissions from braking, acceleration and noise...right outside front doors, school gates and hospital gates. World class bollocks!
I think you never heard the term induced demand my friend and is a bus lane really that bad? Honestly I enjoy them as then my bus can speed right through the traffic.
@@Mgameing123 Yes, bus lanes are great - if you're on a bus. But it's nothing to do with demand, it's about trying to force cars off the road. There are countless areas where there are bus lanes in operation 24/7 where buses only run once an hour, or once every 30 minutes or so up until a certain time, or not on Sundays etc.
But that's not the point. The point is it's forcing other traffic off the roads, making drivers take a longer route and so on, NONE of which is helping the environment which is what the ULEZ thing is supposedly all about.
Besides, buses are now just a private enterprise, in it for profit, why should they get any priority on roads that we all pay for? As I keep on reminding people, these are PUBLIC roads, not for certain people to use or for councils to do what they like with for financial benefit.
All newer cars, especially EVs are heavier than older cars, so even more brake dust, because of the extra kinetic energy that needs stopping.
The bit that always makes my day is the low pollution zone at Heathrow airport. How the hell can you have a low pollution zone next to an airport ?? Then the icing on the cake, there is a 60mph speed restriction on the m4 due to air pollution levels..
They claim the speed limit is due to air pollution, but there is no exemption for EV's.
Why would you want to go there, when you can fly your private jet straight into City airport, right in the middle of the ULEZ?
Once they expand the zone in August I'm alarmed to notice that Heathrow will be INSIDE Khan's ULEZ zone - thus catching out all people (yes I know, those with Non Ulez compliant cars) coming to park at the airport or helpfully drop off/collect passengers. As people come from all over the country, if they're not Londoners or Southerners they may not even be aware of this atrocious scheme until they suddenly find fines dropping through their mailboxes. (Same with Dartford tunnel that very carefully fails everywhere to ever use the word TOLL on signs ....but that's another issue.😢)
And will those who stay PARKED (say for 2 weeks whilst travelling away) be charged the fee for each interim day because they haven't yet exited the zone and therefore are assumed to have been inside the whole time, potentially travelling around the zone? Which, let's face it, is a bit rich if you were parked & immobile....plus already paying exorbitant parking fees!
Motorway speed limits in Wales are being reduced to 50mph, a section at a time so you`re lucky that you are, at the moment, still allowed to travel at 60mph. . We also have the 20mph limits being forced upon us in September, but, don`t worry as I`m sure these ridiculous schemes will be forced upon the whole country sooner or later.
@@martinf8508
50?? On a motorway? What planet are these nutters on, then forcing cars to crunch down to 20 everywhere else? Why? Just why?
So you don't knock down children? Why are the little blighters gadding about in the road (which b.t.w. is for cars, pedestrians belong on the pavement!) Modern cars don't do these speeds, you're in lower gear thus emitting more of the supposed fumes they claim to want to eliminate (so how come your car easily passed that MOT emissions test??). I noticed that the restricted speeds inevitably meant if you got to a red light, the limited speed meant if you hit one you hit ALL of them so tailbacks were worse than cruising at a much more logical 30 in town and getting out of the zone correspondingly quicker. Cruise control won't hack it on such low speeds so you spend all your time glued also to the speedo in terror of being "caught speeding" at a whopping 21 MPH, because you might just be snapped by one the millions of cctv cameras & incur onerous and quite frankly ridiculous "fines" for a minor infraction you never knew you committed.
Hadn't driven in London for 4 years, it's now an utter nightmare and I'm pretty brave. Was driving a friend to hospital appts IN London, but with all the restrictions, signs, cameras, lane changes and narrowing, chicanes, excessive street furniture, pedestrians & cyclists weaving madly all over the place, needing eyes in the back of your head, plus the stress of checking the Speedo every 5 seconds I came home utterly exhausted.
Yes I DO try to use public transport wherever there IS any but so often it's simply not practical either for time or location (try making it to any rural location after 6 pm!!) .
What makes me laugh is if you have a polluting car they are saying stay away but hey, pay £12.50 and come on in, fu#k the pollution.
As said previously, if it was about pollution and the populations health he would just ban the vehicles and not fine the owners, he is such a weasel old Mayor Khan't!
It took a bit of time but another RUclipsr managed to make his 99 plate 1.7 Puma exempt by contacting the manufacturer and getting proof of its NOX value but he's owned it a very long time so it was worth it, i really hope we don't lose more retro/classics due to Mr Weasels money grabbing scrappage scheme!
A weasle in an armoured 3 tonne Range Rover..
@@greatestytcommentator Yep talk about hypocrisy.
How is outright banning these care better than having a fine to pay to use them? People with classic cars can still drive them as much as their budget allows, and it just feeds into the standard cost/benefit calculation we all do anyway (having a car of any type isn’t free from costs of course!) London is already incredibly navigable without a car, I really wish my city was more like that.
@@rainbowevil It just proves that its not about emissions and public health which is the excuse he uses for it, its just another money grab to help fund his mismanagement of TFL etc.
Because it reveals his true intention..propping up the car industry and damaging the low cost fuel industry.
In 2020 we said it was to get us used to the upcoming climate lockdowns but everyone labelled us and laugh. 😡😡😡
They now have a list of the double jabbered sheep, and a list of the non jabbed "troublemakers".
@@user-pf5xq3lq8ithere are millions of people who are refusing to comply, fuck their jabs, fuck their wars fuck the government
ULEZ isn't to do with climate... it's air quality.
@@gitanonumero1983good one
London just had the May election for Mayor!
Shame on all those that didn’t bother!!!
Genius! Astonishingly it seems most people still haven’t figured ULEZ out and think if their car is “compliant” it’s problem over. Well DUH what do you think he’s going to do next. Compliant is whatever they say it is.
You got it right, I am not in the UK, but politicians love to raise the bar, so what is good and compliant today, may not be that tomorrow or next week.
Yes, I saw politicians be all on "Get diesel, it is environmentally friendly" then 3 years later. "Oh no it pollutes so much, tax it to hell!"
Soon I bet the beloved EV's are next on the same chopping block.
Jordan Peterson (whether you like the guy or not) described the totalitarian tiptoe on the Joe rogan show beautifully a few years ago. They get away with it every time.
Move the goal posts every few years just like tax on EV's TA DA!
That's what I said to one of my friend as they recently bought a petrol car from diesel and they said they have ulez compliant car now but I said what guarantee is there that your new petrol car will be ulez compliment by let's say end of 2024, even a prius might not be comment by then this isn't the solution to this nonsense of ulez.
@@CMDRSweeper Diesels were encouraged because they are more fuel efficient, you can travel further on the same amount of fuel and therefor because you are using less fuel you are producing less CO2 emissions (greenhouse gas, global warming etc etc). Diesels however produce huge amounts of NOx which is a toxic gas and is harmful to humans and that's why they trying to get rid of them now.
Another new loophole is just to reject the fine as it's based on anpr and anpr can't be used as evidence anymore due to 1.7 million cloned number plates in the UK, so it's not really a loophole but a legal remedy.
there was a ruling recently (soz I don't have the data) that fines via cameras are non valid...... I'm looking forward to claiming back £180 from Birmingham Council....
I don't know how else to get my message across. I am a ventilation engineer and my area is the whole of the South East of England. The worst polluted place on my patch is Kensington and Chelsea where they have supposedly been protected by the congestion charge since the early 2000s and the ULEZ from it's inception. Most places have new filters every 12 months but there it is every 6 months and the filters are black every time. In the outer boroughs like Bromley or Havering they are only grey after a year. The Zones have no effect on pollution whatsoever. I agree that pollution needs dealing with but they don't have any working solution yet. Also people in the Zone pay for it whether they drive or not. Maintenance people like me pass the charge on to customers all the time.
Keep sending them SAR for copies of all the videos and photos they have on you.
Then send the order that the data be deleted.
Also demand the names of the companies or people who have bought the data off them. You can then repeat the process with them.
Love it 🙏
❤
Gold
@@diannawhyte9595 I told a copper about this idea today, and he had a fit of laughter. Then I added on the Kahn mask, icing on top, ....
@@diannawhyte9595 Sorry wrong thread. The Khan bit is people registering their vehicles with Khan as the register keeper. Then all fines are sent to him, and he has to identify the driver. Clearly he's not going to know who the driver is, so he takes the fine.
Now if you do that, say and you are clearly black, white or chinese, or female, all you have to do is wear a Khan mask.
Then when the look at the video, or your brief shows it to the court, with you sitting their saying nothing as is your right, the other side looks very stupid.
What a gem of a channel! Keep up the good work 👍
Loving this bit of knowledge. By the way i was working on a job last week , with other trades men , and one of the trades person had a Renault diesel van, 23 plate. Makes me think why on earth are they still making diesel vehicles, with everything that’s going on now.😮
I'd love to see the air polution statistics from the start of the first lockdown. That's as close to a car free set of data that could be collected.
They always love to boast of their "scappage" schemes but completly miss the simple face that £2000 off a £20,000 new car doesn't make it remotely close to affordable to most drivers. If people could afford £18,000 for a car, they probably wouldn't be driving around in a £500 banger in the first place.
Human emissions went down 25% during lockdown. It had an effect on the atmosphere of less than 0.2%. In other words, 99% of co2 in the atmosphere..does NOT come from humans.
Source: NOAA co2 global monitoring station Hawaii
Lies. You are WEF/77th brigade. Your RUclips account was created less than 1 month ago.
@@FullFact548 They did for the 2008/9 scrappage scheme. It was only available for px on new cars. Although many dealerships matched the deals unofficially on recent used vehicles.
@@FullFact548 Nice name. Also I thought that the issue was carbon dioxide not "nitrogen dioxide" I would suggest not trying to implement nitrogen emission cuts on farmers then since "Reductions in transportation sector emissions are largely responsible for the NO2 anomalies" no need to cut back on meat then right? -Fact checked by... Research funded by... Anyway, just buy my patented "eco-friendly" government subsidised and enforced items. Gov: Why global lockdown was a good thing. Why inflation is actually good. How to deal with the Cost of Living crisis. Why you shouldn't ask for a pay rise. How to deal with stress and move on in life. How humans emit co2 by breathing. Why you're morally obligated to not procreate.
@@FullFact548 Really really interesting stuff there, could you point me to some peer reviewed literature so I can look further into the details? Also where does the estimated 8 million figure come from? Really surprised farm animals have been kept around this long considering the "threat" they pose.
Recent news is that a bill in the EU has passed allowing Dutch gov to forcibly make Dutch farmers to sell their farm land to meet the emission targets. Also the "voluntary" option is they will buy it at 120% market value but you have to promise to not operate farms elsewhere in Netherlands or EU.
Very interesting, they could have just payed them to not farm so they aren't forced to sell. Hard not to see it as a land grab whilst it's been well known the Dutch gov has been struggling for land to build housing...
I might be wrong but I don’t think they will go for road charging just yet. If they go too fast it will cause a huge stir and they will have non payment trouble (until digital ID anyway). My bet is they tighten the ULEZ standards a few times first to condition the public into accepting being charged to drive on their own roads.
Digital ID comes September.
1.Scotland’s current position
This research project draws together Scottish, UK and international examples and baseline
evidence on the concept of ‘20 minute neighbourhoods’, and how it can be best translated in
a Scottish context. The project identifies areas of good practice, and takes account of our
geography, demography, economy, governance and relevant policy drivers to inform the
translation of the concept.
The Scottish Government defines a 20 minute neighbourhood as:
‘where people can meet their needs within a 20 minute walk from their house -
enabling people to live better, healthier lives and supporting our net zero ambitions.’
2
The project had two main aims:
1. To consider the ambition for 20 minute neighbourhoods in Scotland, taking
account of the differing settlement patterns across the country, and to highlight
interventions that would support delivery of the concept, supported by findings
from a baseline analysis
2. To analyse international evidence of the success of interventions to achieve
these ambitions, including identifying specific success factors, place-making
impacts, barriers to success, regulatory frameworks, funding mechanisms and
stakeholder engagement and buy-in.
The Scottish policy context is defined in section 1.1, while the details of the definition of a 20
minute neighbourhood and the desired outcomes are explained in section 1.2. The baseline
methodology and results are set out in sections 1.3 and 1.4. Section 2 presents the evidence
from UK and international case studies. Feedback from a range of stakeholders informed the
subsequent suggested ambitions and recommendations for implementation, see
organisations listed in Appendix C. ...... !!!
@@GeoffBuysCarsafter the consultation ressult?
That's why they were desperate to keep the recent global "health emergancy" going as long as possible because they needed more time to phase in their social credit system (health passport). Also note suddenly it's a "climate crisis" this phrase has replaced the previous "health crisis". Before 2020 it was never called "climate crisis" but since the first "crisis" Didn't last long enough they've had to make another one to justify totalitarianism.
@@GeoffBuysCars
For what exactly?
Great stuff! Well done Geoff! If a couple of thousand people do this it would be something 😂
It could be better! If everyone in the country with a scrap car (MOT Failures) signed it over to Sadiq Khan it would cause chaos for him
Even if your current car is ULEZ compliant, they will forever raise the bar so that one day it won't be. Then there'll be the push for EVs only in London. I also still think it's hypocritical to allow people to pollute as long as they pay. WTF!
Malicious rules should be ignored
Yes it is your duty.
In Aberdeen there's not a fee, but a fine of £60 or £30 if paid within 14 days for non compliant vehicles, this comes into place in June, how can a council extort money like this?
As far as I'm concerned if I have paid vehicle tax/road tax I've paid to use His majesty's roads. If a town or an area of a town is going to implement road charging to collect money from visitors or people passing thru their areas then when people from that or those areas leave their areas they must pay to leave them. How would all the schemes affect the travel industry. In particular areas such as Cornwall and Wales who rely quite a bit on tourism? Not been clearly thought thru like the 15 minute prisons, oops sorry, cities has it?
Unfortunately I think it has been very well planned. ULEZ and 15 minute cities are one and the same thing. Clean air zone cameras essentially geofence an entire area, the standards can then tighten until the public is priced out of private transport. There’s your 15 minute city.
@@chevchelios8582 Then what happens to the car/motorcycle industry? In the UK governments have relied on tax from vehicle tax, petrol tax and tax on anything related to vehicles having VAT. When that dwindles where will that money come from?
Unfortunately our Marxist overlords in Wales couldn't care less about business and tourism. They've already started charging a tourist tax and will implement blanket 20mph speed limits instead of 30mph in September despite massive opposition. They've also started looking at road pricing per mile. I'm afraid this is being implemented everywhere in the UK under different names and no matter what the public thinks the people pulling the strings in the background aren't listening.
@@simonchilli2088 Those industries will largley disappear and everyone will lose their jobs. The only cars will available will cost a million or so to buy be made in tiny numbers and only be for the billinaire elities and MPs. That's the plan.
His majesty is a big boss in the WEF gang. Good luck with that.
This is what we need to do: 1) look into the rules of what we can or cannot do legally to run for Mayor of London. 2) Crowdfund to raise money for this if legal to do so. 3) Find a suitable candidate to stand as mayor with the correct policies and get voted in someone who will end the war on motorists
Engaging in the 'democratic process' is what got you into this mess in the first place. One definition of insanity is to repeat the same actions and expecting a different result. 'Suitable person', you're having a laugh...
you are ABSOLUTLY NAIVE - You think voting makes any difference? lol - You can only get in IF you're in The Club... and this ultimately leads to involvement with 'young children'. That's why Child-line with Ester Rantzen was created - YOU gave YOUR money to the 1000's of kiddie fiddlers in public office - and the BBC for years . Isn't that right Ted the Grocer?
5:03 and dont forget mould in our homes ESPECIALLY now that many cannot afford to heat their homes properly during winter. Currently investigqting this further and going to approach some media outlets that might run with it.
I asked TfL for data to back up the ULEZ... was met with radio silence.
Sadiq Khan *won’t* be able to go around to the owner of that car’s house, because thanks to the Data Protection Act, he won’t be able to see the previous keeper’s address on his new logbook! 😆
Private parking companies pay for data so they can post fines out to the correct address.
@@Applepie409people who pay these private companies invoices are probably same people who pay TV licence etc, simpletons who love being ripped off.
I was looking for a new insurance quote as mine was nearing renewal, and I notice my car insurance would have nearly doubled (£344 up to £677)with 17years no claims if some lowlife piece of crap hadn't have stolen my vehicle. Motorists are being hit from every angle and priced off the roads.
I was hit from behind at traffic lights and despite protected no claims and over 20 years claim free my premium still went up 30%
Even if the accident or theft is not your fault the Insurence company’s will still increase your premium as your classed as A Risk in their world...
It’s another one of life’s cons.... 😡
Shop around.
Another insurer may offer you a discounted rate for "new business".
Do it all the time..
Usually stay with current insurer I'd the following years quote is within a tenner not worth moving...
..
Comparison websites really help speed up that process....
Thought our MOT tests check emissions then pass it ,so getting screwed again
Wait for the fine and ask for an invoice. They can't produce the invoice because you've never contracted with them.
Would that really work?
The fine notification IS an invoice, isn't it?
@@flowwesterly6136 Google the BOEVAT Remedy
@@markrainford1219 No. They will try and say it is but it won't be a correctly formatted invoice, according to the legal description of an invoice. AS you've never agreed to or signed a contract, how can they invoice you. You will also require an invoice for HMRC, so if they refuse they are inciting you into tax fraud. I've beaten parking companies twice until a crooked magistrate broke the law and judged against me. Problem is the whole system is corrupt.
@@BillCooper1776 hmm skeptical.
If we ask for an invoice claiming we've not contracted to or for whatever fine.
The enforcement agency will just site the relevant law, statute, regulation that gives them the "authority" to issue said fine?
According to the RAC there is 691,559 cars in outer london which are registered before 2015, so if we take the £110 million for scrapping those cars that means that each car gets approx £159 per vehicle.
Not to mention it's not green to scrap perfectly working vehicles that are 8 years old. Extremely wasteful. Another thing is consumer goods made to fail and be impossible to repair creating E-waste millions of tons of it. One of the biggest pollutants now. No eco warriors going after that through? Wonder why?
Seems literally about the right value
Just enough to pay for a current TV licence if you're stupidly paying for one!
Most petrol vehicles after 2006 are compliant, so that figure is vastly lower than 700k ish.
@@dubster9876 Not true. Most petrol cars older than 2015 and diesels older than 2016 are non compliant.
Isn't there a chance that the "new owner" would come around and just scrap the old vehicles "gifted" to him ??
Easier to break the cameras after midnight. Less hassle
I would never condone this but have heard that using a large power water pistol filled with either paint or shamefully a oil water petrol accelerant mix which is then ignited would render the cameras useless, works. Of course you would have to be fully face masked with a balaclava and able to move quickly out of the vicinity.
@@mezzoca8110 sounds like a plan
Kathy Hopkins made a video on a cheap product used to permanently disable those cameras. If enough people do it, they won't have the money to replace them. Sabotage and resistance.
Black spray paint does the job. A couple of squirts on the lens...hey ho.
Why not extend a pair of wire cutters to whatever length is necessary to trim your unwanted bushes stem much easier than removing the bush. 😜
Do not consent in any way. Sabotage and pushback. This imposition of cameras and fines is undemocratic and unlawful.
We the people answer to Common Law. We contract and/or give our consent to participating in contract law.
If your vehicle has a licence plate and you hold a driving licence, that is your consent given..
This is where people need to understand law. Not legislation. Those two items are your contract with dvla and you must follow their rules and regulations
@@evelghostrider not new charges though! Or any right to collect our data via cameras
@H you have the rite to request your images captured by all cctv if you are in public.. you write to the place in question and request your data be deleted each time.
But in reality, who is going todo that ?
If your in a vehicle and its road traffic cameras then your driving licence is your contract to abide by dvla rules and regulations.
It's not a licence of competence for using the road like people think,
People do not read the small print, nor do they educate themselves legally.
The public are views as plebs, its why many rules and regulations were written in Latin, most could not understand it.
Now legislation is confused as law, but its not. Laws apply equally to everyone. Laws do not give any people or groups special privileges.
@@evelghostrider If this is the case, surely there is a tech wizard out there that can set an app of some sort up.
All cameras locations are put on a map, everytime your car/phone passes one it automatically pings off an email requesting your images.
Must be do able surely?
The police read the rear number plate, but the ULEZZ reads the front plate, so having a false front number plate works aswell, just hope the police do not spot it.
I like this new idea, a legal way to avoid paying.
what a great idea everyone should do this
The cameras still need to come down, any way you like, no matter what.
My car passes it's MOT on emissions but is not legal in London. It's complete bollocks
People should film Mr Kahn more driving his big SUV and keep posting them
Another point we are no longer a member of the EU so why are they claiming the EU laws.
Good point!
Part of the Brexit deal...
BRiNO.
It was all pretend .
If we're to truly be out of the EU.
Then all EU based law made in the last 40years would have to be re made/repealed.
Some will be.
But it will take another 40 years to legally unwind from the EU shackles ..
Because they are our laws , we ratified them.
Could you register the car to someone that has recently passed. I would imagine it would be yonks until the system contacts you.
If mileage charging is ever introduced, would it be possible to do as Geoff said, register the car to the PM or hated Minister or Mayor, abandon the vehicle, with others on a London Bridge of Motorway etc and watch the carnage..?
We already pay per mile ... it's called the price of petrol / diesel.
@@joebaird5874 And road tax!
Many petrol cars prior to Euro 4 may still be compliant. I have a 2001 Saab 93 2.0SE Turbo that's fine. It's down to your NOx emissions. TfL limit is 0.08g/km, my 93 comes in at 0.01g/km. The details should be on your Registration doc.
Regarding bikes, I believe the figure is 0.15g/km most bikes should be compliant too. If it's not on your reg doc, check with the manufacturer. Failing that, there's several garages that will do it. Think the charge is around £160. You should get a Certificate of Conformity and then the vehicle has to be registered with TfL. I'll be doing this with my 30 year old Triumph Thunderbird 900 (when it finally gets repaired!).
My 03 mini cooper s is apparently compliant too.
Thou haven't checked this officially yet.
..
I've ust bought a motor bi-cycle and all bikes are charged 100£s for road tax.
There's no emissions data on my motor bi-cycle log book.
I will double check again....
@@stuartd9741 of there isn't any data for your bike, contact the manufacturer first.
Good advice
My guzzi is euro 3 compliant, but khan's muppets charge me the same cost as a car ? Why should I pay extra to gave it declared compliant, I bought the bloody thing new because of its low emissions, yet I could buy an old brit thing that spits out oil and pollution and its e exempt
Yet front gardens are still being ripped out to park more fatmobiles that will only do short polluting journeys
Seeing the money from fines are being used to party,and assist the Muslim community..so love this guys brilliant...
If it was about pollution then the MOT emissions tests would be tightened, all cars that have an MOT will have had their emissions tested and are legal to drive anywhere in the country.
It is all about filling TfL coffers with fines.
Remember that cars over 40 years old will be exempt and their emissions will be very high.
What a hoot! Really hope that this works.
I agree , if Everyone Refuses to pay. I don’t think they would ever be able to contend with the mass Paperwork. Khan is a Normal Politician attacking those Who can Not fight Back.
I remember in the 1800’s and early 1900’s when the Royal family was appalled to find out that 50 per cent of children in London didn’t make it to adult hood because of the industrial smoke and constant smog. Lung disease was very common. So they sent the teenagers to Crimea, India, Africa, France and Germany with guns, in uniforms to help with their breathing.
Because we all know the leaders of Britain have ALWAYS been concerned about the ‘lungs’ of the citizens, which is why they closed ALL the mines, the Royal Family and Downing Street were in tears about the “poor lungs” of the workers.
A nonsense comment and if you believe it then you should know the Royal Family has no power of direction on such matters. It would be the UK Parliament that has been democratically elected under universal suffrage since 1918 with a more limited voting system since previously.
Your a legend, thanks so much for all your support and hard graft to get vital information out to the people 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽💪🏽💯🙏🏾
All decisions by the London Mayor are vetted and approved by the London Assembly, That's 25 members. So ULEZ is not the fault of 1 man, at all. Yes, it hits some poor people with vehicles but only 5% of cars are not ULEZ compliant anyway ! What's more important ? The needs of a small percentage of drivers with old cars or the health of people living in cities including newborns ? I think I know the answer !!
Spot on. Do anything you can to screw up these schemes and I mean anything! Keep it going Geoff nice to see the channel growing. Censor tube wont like that but we do! My missus runs a compliant hybrid CHR and I run a very none compliant 2002 D4D Rav 4 which I love ! Manchester's scheme is on hold at present but should be scrapped Burnham is a twat!
Cut the poles down , remove the cameras , paint them , and all stick to not paying as in Birmingham's case .
@@paulwainwright6903 100% spot on
@@wideyxyz2271 they did this I France in the end it cost them so much that they gave up putting them back .
@Paul Wainwright And thats what beeds to be done (and is happening) here . 👍🏻💯💥
If you are not named on the v5 and or the insurance address is not the same, the insurance company will end or invalidate your insurance.
I noticed this year a well known insurance company wanted a copy of the V5, a live MOT certificate, a copy of your drving licence, a copy of your UKGateway digital driving licence showing any points, else they not insuring you.
Parliament has absolute sovereignty and is supreme over all other government institutions, means that the Government could end this additional disaster at the "blink of an eye" but it lacks the resolve to do so.
Pure quality content pal ✌️ ♥ 🎸 🍻 😂
Any Lotus Carltons in the Car Park?
Love this idea and i presume the keeper does not mean they are the owner either?
If 9 out of 10 cars in outer London are already ULEZ compliant what difference will ULEZ make?
How is the air being polluted by cars if 90% of them are already compliant?
Unfortunately this won’t work. For speeding fines if they get no response from the registered keeper they check the insurance database and send a notice of intended prosecution to the person who has insured the car asking who the driver was. If the information is provided they prosecute the driver for speeding. If not they prosecute the insured person for failing to Identify the driver which is punishable by a fine and 6 penalty points. They will no doubt follow the same process for failure to pay the ULEZ charge.
They only get 14 days to issue a NIP, including weekends and Bank Holidays
@@s4owner The NIP must be served on the registered keeper within 14 days. Once that is done any other person can be required to provide information leading to the identity of the driver.
It's motor fraud buddy and it would not work. When you sign a V5C form there's a declaration on it that you sign to inform the DVLA that the information provided in the document is accurate. If the DVLA are informed by the nominated person that he did not agree to take ownership of the vehicle then the previous owner is going to get charged with a crime. I guarantee this didn't happen. It's just a tabloid story. This also isn't a new and novel idea. It's used by Fraudulent Taxi companies quite commonly and it does get investigated by the DVLA.
I wonder if the public who live in Greater London which used to be in Surrey, Kent, Middx etc would want their council to remove their borough out of Greater London?
Maybe a pile should be done on this?
Which would give less powers over the public and less moneys to TFL and running London that we may want to all distance our selfs from now.
How councils would respond to this question?
"Glexit"‽
The sooner Khan is kicked out of power the better, hopefully he’ll also be charged for prematurely rolling out the cameras!
They done this from poll tax too council tax
Is there something in the law where you need the owner/registered keeper's permission to drive the vehicle? Maybe not so much from an insurance perspective but is it not taking the vehicle without consent once it is gifted? I'm very lucky in the fact I never have to go to london
These laws will get to your neck of the woods eventually and probably sooner than later if people do not rebel and reject this authoritarian nonsense. It also does not affect me either because although living in London, I do not drive.
Thats a bit NMP of you? (Not my problem) This is a threat TO EVERYONE so you better take notice and take action!
@@wideyxyz2271 This is EXACTLY why we've seen identity politics pushed down our throats with constant race,gender,orientation baiting for the last 10 years or so. To divide us up as much as possible so they'll be little or no organised resistance to this tyranny.
It will come to all "cities". I don't live near a city but the large town nearby has just inexplicably, and without any consultation, announced its to "apply to become a city". ??
Pretty sure the offence is known as taking without owners consent. Keeper is not the same as owner
I loved the copious amount of times you used the word "bollocks" in the clip..... as this is my favorite swear word of all time....
Great try! But lot old petrols comply if you get emissions certification from manufacturer especially old motorcycles!
Complying is agreeing to it for everyone. Slippery slope.
They will just tighten the compliance standards once it’s running. Compliant is whatever they say it is. Then road charging is scheduled for 2026.
My discovery 2 V8 04 reg is ulez exempt I've check and this is correct lol
Yep you need a V8 with increased ground clearance and four wheel drive because those wet leaves are a safety hazard! Your car isn't polluting, it's the 1.6 petrol some retiree drives a few miles a week to go to the shops....
@@khalidacosta7133 How the fcuk do you know where he lives and why he needs an off road capable vehicle? Do you have a crystal ball? Do you understand the concept of 4WD and high and low ratios and how to use them in snow and ice conditions and on steep slopes terrain? No I dont think you do plus you dont know where the guy lives so ten out of ten for stupid sarcastic comment.
6:15 yep and stands in stark contrast to Boris when he was mayor - he cycled a lot of the time.
There's a thing I saw on RUclips about how a guy bought a secrecy screen for a laptop, cut it to fit his number plate and showed how cameras can't read your number plate from above, although it was in America it still seems like a good idea
Good idea. 👍
If you watch the film: inside man with Clive Owen.
That film reveals another way that one could obfuscate the cameras vision.
..
I'm not saying anymore....
I heard many years ago that spraying the number plates with HAIR SPRAY works well to combat cameras. I don't know how many coats were needed but anything is worth a try.
Hi Geoff, a friend of mine suggested another genius idea. Apparently heritage vehicles (anything over 25 years old) are all ULEZ exempt. They also escape VED and have really cheap insurance.
Interestingly, in case anyone wanted to set up a central London bus Co this would include old Route Masters.
Historic Vehicles over 40 years old are exempt....at the moment but they change rules when it suits !
It’s actually over 40 years old, and yes they are ULEZ exempt as well as MOT exempt. However, unless someone understands the responsibility of driving very old cars and has the ability to self maintain and regularly self examine and maintain and repair these cars, they are not a viable substitute just to avoid the ULEZ fine. Most modern car owners would give up after a few weeks. Most don’t have power steering, air conditioning, certainly no or at best rudimentary crumple zones, no air bags and all cars of that age will suffer from rust either at present or in the future. I run classic cars myself, and although I don’t have a problem doing so, I’m very aware that 99.9% of the general public wouldn’t be capable of living with such vehicles.
@@daol4258 with the speed of traffic in London air bags , crumple zones, lack of seat belts is pretty irrelevant. And a 40 year old Volvo is pretty well.bullet proof -they don't call them tanks for nothing .
@@daol4258 don't be so absolutely silly - in fact you're hardly worth a reply - and I've been involved with vehicles for 51 years now
The running costs for an old routemaster bus would soon break you, even though most are fitted with a modern Isuzu engine
V5 is not proof of ownership! It says so on the paperwork!
This is joke...
I drove straight to Hyde park in April going back a few years in my 1973 Citroën which just happens to be exempt from all that ulez bollocks because it's too old 🤣
Yeah anything pre EU computer logged emissions ratings is pretty much exempt. But cheekily so are governmental cars.
Your car is also exempt if you have a disability badge ✌️
Didn’t know this. Thanks for sharing.
car has to be registered on it's taxation class as disabled... that's different to having a disabled badge!
Why
Awesome, didn't know that.. Thanks
No it's not, the car owner has to have the car registered disabled on the log book and to get that you have to be getting pip entitlement on the higher rate mobility....
Love it. I've got 2 old bangers for him. Thank you
Bloody good idea! You didn't mention the other trick that lots of people are doing. A family member started getting parking fines, driving in bus lanes etc and when she looked at the photographs, its wasn't her car - someone had cloned her number plates. It was a much older Honda compared to hers. I am pissed off because she asked me to help dispute the violations, as English is not her first language. I wish the guy had looked at the cars of the Mayor's retinue and cloned their number plates. Contacting the Met seems to make little difference.
Just buy a 40 plus year old car .Free road tax no ULEZ charges.
On the day the ULEZ comes into power, any car built before 1 January 1980 will be unaffected by the new rules, and tax-exempt vehicles will be excluded on a rolling annual basis
I have that box ticked. I want to trailer tow it to London behind the Tesla, just to drive an exempt V8 around London.😅
The scrappage scheme removed so many viable older cars it is a national tradgedy
Worth doing if you enter the ULEZ every day, decent 40 year olds are quite expensive now.
They can just remove the exemption. And it certainly won’t touch road charging in a few years time.
@@djtaylorutube8.2 Cadillac Coupe Deville..no bigger production V8 .Running on clean burning LPG so half price fuel .
Vote them out, get a council that will scrap this.
The bastards will just scrap them all if he has the v5 ie log book
Logbook is not proof of ownership, only a receipt is proof of ownership
Surely not a “genius” plan! When you tax the car with the “new owner/keeper” part of the V5 surely you become the new keeper!? 😂 or if you add another person as the new keeper and then tax it, you won’t be able to tax it again in future…. DOH! 😂
Anyone can tax the car it doesn't have to be the new keeper as long as the vehicle is taxed.
That's what I thought.
Just found this article..." How much money did ULEZ make in 2022?
· Through data obtained via a freedom of information request, the BBC has found ULEZ generated £224,633,003 in 2022, an average of £18.7m a month. Money came in through two streams: daily charges and PCNs. Any vehicle driven within the zone must meet ULEZ emission standards, or pay a £12.50 daily charge." That works out at over 17 million cars still driving in the ulez zones. How does that help the air in London???