Ambassador Chas Freeman has a wealth of knowledge and explaining in a quiet fashion and is a brilliant analysist I always learn so much and thank you Nima
A pleasure to listen to Chas Freeman. Lovely tranquil style, with educative well reasoned statements and arguments. It is sad to see such talent not be in use where it is most needed. The current gang seems like outright amateurs by comparison.
Excellent discussion. Thank you. Ambassador Freeman embodies the perfect elder statesman- very intelligent and knowledgable with the ability to break down complicated issues so that everyone can understand what is important.
Amb. Freeman is the quintessential Diplomat with a capital “D”. He should give classes to our governments diplomats and anyone with ambitions to be a good one.
Amb. Freeman has respect for everybody, including the folks he fundamentally and morally disagrees with. Only a truly respectable man could be that respectful.
The management of reality and conformity to the narrative, is detrimental to western civilization. Free speech and open exchange of ideas used to be our strength. No more.
Canada absolutely should turn to China. Developing rapid rail with China would open up the geography north of the 50th parallel, thus expanding urban development, resource development, Arctic port development, entrepreneurial spaces, and space for services to all the people who have not had even good cell service!
Canadians have been subjected to a concerted anti-China campaign for several years now - accelerated since Chrystia Freeland gained power in Trudeau's Liberal government. Most Canadians have been thoroughly propagandized to view china with distrust, if not active dislike. It would take a massive shift in our media and government/academic spokespeople before Canadians would support turning to China and BRICS block over allowing USA to exploit us.
Yes Canada the home ofPORNHUB. please get your moral act together you put up with that Trudeau clown like it seems for far to long. Yes blame others from within an echo chamber, just get a mirror and sadly I'm commenting from Australia a place like yours dominated by British arrogance.
The US needs Canada's oil, so tariffs would be desastrous for the US economy. But tariffs would be a fantastic opportunity for Canada to eventually join the multipolar world...
[Edit : @IrinaFurman (YT comment shuffle)] Why waste money on tons of money on a wall, for that which can be solved by the stroke of a pen ? Look back to the 80's.
No doubt Trump would exclude Canadian crude and electricity from the tariffs, as there would be a huge outcry from US business otherwise. Hopefully, Canada will refuse to export oil and electricity if Trump goes ahead with tariffs on us.
Michael Bennett's a real piece of work. Treason is the only crime defined in the US Constitution, for a reason. The Founders didn't want it to be used as a political weapon. It can only occur in wartime.
The State Dept. is onto marketing it's very own Washing Laundry White Powder in compliance with DOGE 1 cost cutting; it's called DIPLOMAT, an answer to stubborn stains of Policy.😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Correct Question. And here is the answer: Because no one actually wants to have them. *_No one_* ... _"The Reservat of Israel was created so that the Jws don't come over here."_ *_'It’s time to admit that Arthur Balfour was a white supremacist - and an anti-Semite, too.'_* _A century ago, 67 words changed the course of history in the Middle East. In a statement that could fit into two tweets, Arthur Balfour, then the British Foreign Secretary, announced that the British government would support establishing a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine._ _One hundred years later, the profound legacy of what became known as the Balfour Declaration continues to define the dynamic between Israelis and Palestinians. And though Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in London this week commemorating the centennial with Theresa May, it’s worth understanding why the Declaration is really nothing worth celebrating._ _Though he may be most known for aiding the Zionist cause in 1917, it’s crucial to remember that Arthur Balfour was a white supremacist. He made that much clear in his own words. In 1906, the British House of Commons was engaged in a debate about the native blacks in South Africa. Nearly all the members of Parliament agreed that the disenfranchisement of the blacks was evil. Not so Balfour, who - almost alone - argued against it._ _“We have to face the facts,” Lord Balfour said. “Men are not born equal, the white and black races are not born with equal capacities: they are born with different capacities which education cannot and will not change.”_ _But Balfour’s troubling views were not limited to Africa. In fact, despite his now iconic support for Zionism, he was not exactly a friend to the Jews. In the late 19th century, pogroms targeting Jews in the Pale of Settlement had led to waves of Jewish flight westward, to England and the United States. This influx of refugees led to an increase in British anti-immigrant racism and outright anti-Semitism - themes not unfamiliar to us today. Support for political action against immigrants grew as the English public demanded immigration control to keep certain immigrants, particularly Jews, out of the country._ _The public found a sympathetic ear in Balfour. In 1905, while serving as Prime Minister, Balfour presided over the passage of the Aliens Act. This legislation put the first restrictions on immigration into Great Britain, and it was primarily aimed at restricting Jewish immigration. According to historians, Balfour had personally delivered passionate speeches about the imperative to restrict the wave of Jews fleeing the Russian Empire from entering Britain._ _It may seem astonishing that Balfour, whose support of the Zionist cause has made him a hero among Jews, would have implemented anti-Jewish laws. But the truth is his support of Zionism stemmed from the exact same source as his desire to limit Jewish immigration to Britain._ _Both can be traced back to his white supremacist beliefs. Balfour lived in an era of stirring nationalism, highly defined by ethno-religious identity. Because of these sentiments, the early 20th century was a time when ostensibly liberal Western nations struggled with the challenge of incorporating Jewish citizens. What the Zionists provided Balfour with was a solution to the challenges Jewish citizens posed to his ethno-nationalist vision, a solution that didn’t force him to reckon with them. Instead of insisting that societies accept all citizens as equals, regardless of racial or religious background, the Zionist movement offered a different answer: separation._ _Balfour saw in Zionism not just a blessing for Jews, but for the West as well. As he wrote in 1919 in his Introduction to Nahum Sokolow’s History of Zionism, the Zionist movement would “mitigate the age-long miseries created for Western civilization by the presence in its midst of a Body which it too long regarded as alien and even hostile, but which it was equally unable to expel or to absorb.”_ _By both giving Jews a place to go and a place to leave, Zionism seemingly solved two problems at once, in Balfour’s mind. In other words, his support of Zionism was motivated to an extent by his desire to protect Britain from the negative effects, the “miseries,” of having Jews in its midst. Rather than protecting the rights of one of its minorities, Britain could simply export them, or at least, not import any more._ _Needless to say, this view of Zionism is steeped in the same kind of white supremacy as Balfour’s view of South Africa’s blacks. But his support of the Zionist dream had another problem. Rather than solving the problem of how to handle a minority living in a white majority country, the Balfour Declaration just shifted the same problem to a different geography._ _For the tension between ethno-nationalism and equality is equally present today between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean sea, where the Israeli state rules over the fate of millions of Palestinians who either have no right to vote, are treated as second-class citizens or are refugees denied repatriation. Today, it is Israel that views Palestinians like myself as “demographic threats”, and sees “the presence in its midst of a Body which it too long regarded as alien and even hostile, but which it was equally unable to expel or to absorb.”_ _That Balfour’s legacy of supremacy persists as much as British support for Israel does is no accident. We have arrived at this point today because the supremacist attitudes of Balfour informed policy, lending imperial might to a project in pursuit of national self-determination for Jews by trampling on the rights of native non-Jews._ _Remarkably, Balfour was unabashedly aware of the hypocrisy of his stance. “The weak point of our position of course is that in the case of Palestine we deliberately and rightly decline to accept the principle of self-determination,” he wrote in a letter to the British prime minister in 1919. “We do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country… the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.”_ _Those Arabs, of course, made up approximately 90 percent of the population. My grandparents were among them._ _Therein lies the fundamental problem that continues through this day, 100 years later. Palestinians are denied the right to have rights because from the outset, their views, their human rights and by extension their very humanity, were consistently seen as inferior to those of others. That was clear in Balfour’s perspective and the British Mandate’s policy. And it persists in one form or another in many of the policies of the state of Israel through this day._ _Today as much as in 1917, the battle between ethno-nationalism and equality, between particularism and universalism, has risen to the foreground, from Donald Trump’s rise in America to Theresa May’s Brexited Britain. Rather than resolving this tension, Balfour’s support for Zionism merely exported it to Palestine._ _Resisting the legacy of his racism will be the key to peace in Palestine/Israel and beyond._ Source: *_FORWARD_* ,Yousef Munayyer, political analyst and writer.
I like the idea of Greenland - Denmark is supporting the genocide, so it must be sympathetic to the Israelis. Ask them to allow a few million Israelis to settle in Northern Greenland 😂
As always, a very interesting conversation. One thing I do wonder about, when these various experts talk about new treaties, whether for arms control or nuclear non-proliferation, or even a new JCPOA with Iran: is how any country could trust the USA to honour any agreements/treaties? We have seen over and over - actually dating to America's earliest days as a country - that the US government will refute any treaty at any time it decides. As a Canadian, I have seen US decide it no longer likes the terms of treaties with us, as in Trump refusing to abide by the terms of NAFTA, Iran has had USA refuse to abide by the terms of JCPOA, Denmark is now experiencing US denial of their treaty regarding Greenland, and I am sure there are other examples easily found. So what is the point of negotiating a treaty or agreement? Is it just to gain time while strengthening economies and militaries against US?
AI stumbled early on because it was not woke enough. So they spent a lot of time indoctrinating it, now it is a garbage-in/garbage-out product. Open AI will succeed. China also has made significant advances in Quantum Computing, those two combined will be a game changer.
The accident of the plane and the military helicopter was not the fault of the air traffic controllers. Under no circumstances should a military or any other helicopter or plane be flying through the descending path of an aircraft landing at the airport. This is a ridiculous policy that allows military craft to patrol the river through an active landing zone and should have never been allowed. The bullshit about the air traffic controllers is just a slight of hand by government and media to muddy the water so the real issue of military crossing the flight path is not corrected! get the military helicopters out of that area for good! Period! Otherwise this will surely happen again ans it has been lucky to nave not happened until this point only. Complete craziness on behalf of he military.
Instead of arming Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan; US tax payer money should be spent on emergency services, infrastructure, healthcare, education, homelessness etc. Instead of pursuing delusions of grandeur, the US should seek mutually beneficial cooperation with the rest the world.
How can you not be opposed to racial discrimination disguised as a DEI Program and the promotion of weird gender ideology indoctrination and paid for with Taxpayer money?
A camel is a horse designed by a committee. A platypus is a bird put together by bureaucrats. An elephant is a mouse built to military specifications. A shrimp is a fish conceived in the legislative process. More often than not, a foreign policy is a course of action devised by a committee of bureaucrats and military men under the oversight of a legislature. Not surprisingly, such a thing defies simple description. - Amb. Chas Freeman, _The Diplomat's Dictionary_
👑🐯 People firstly tell you're Kids to put down the weapons and the animosity,antagonism,dislike, enmity,hatred, hostility, and pick up some book's 📚 if people aren't going to fight and defend their own history well you know the outcome to that. also look at the word's you use to Express Yourself young people that's what's going to change your life and always dream big were making history everyday for the up and coming generation's instead of them scratching there head saying why me or pointing finger's at anyone else. Keep fighting🥊keep winning🏆shining🌟keep smiling😊 may God Almighty grace and blessing uplift you we're from the beautiful 🇻🇳 jungle peace.✌️🐯❣️ 🌴🐅🖼🖌👋🐯🖐📱X
he is objecteur de conscience.. confronted by secrecy and illegality, and lying under oath about it! confronting the still unpunished lies and the secret illegal abuse. As she still does confronting those pretending(corrupt) jerks.
@@lornamackay4069 I perceive her as a member of the western cultural hemisphere. At least she does everything to get a highpayed job in it. So i guess that *_'White'_* stands for *_'innocent angle'_* ... ^^
This was a really great episode. I really appreciate it. I have felt lost for the last couple of weeks so this really helped anchor me again to current events.
What is a "traditional Arab dictator"? Does he look like a Donald Trump? Or a George W. Bush? Or is it something that exists in the head of the speaker alone? Please avoid stereotypes of any sort.
Ambassador Chas Freeman has a wealth of knowledge and explaining in a quiet fashion and is a brilliant analysist I always learn so much and thank you Nima
Snowd..en is not a traitor. He has educated the world on US surveillance.......May he always be protected....❤😊
A pleasure to listen to Chas Freeman. Lovely tranquil style, with educative well reasoned statements and arguments. It is sad to see such talent not be in use where it is most needed. The current gang seems like outright amateurs by comparison.
Snowden's oath was to uphold the Constitution, not to blindly obey his government. His actions were the opposite of treason, imo.
I fully agree with you.
The US is fast turning into a fascist dictatorship !
The world is tired of the US hypocricy !
He supported a higher form of authority, the US Constitution over the hidden, illegal spying on US citizens. DC politicians are shameless.
That's exactly how I view it too
Excellent discussion. Thank you. Ambassador Freeman embodies the perfect elder statesman- very intelligent and knowledgable with the ability to break down complicated issues so that everyone can understand what is important.
Amb. Freeman superb! Thank you. Best wishes.
Amb. Freeman is the quintessential Diplomat with a capital “D”. He should give classes to our governments diplomats and anyone with ambitions to be a good one.
Thank you for inviting Ambassador Freeman, regularly. The information provided by our search host are always very informative.❤
'a disappointed bully, promising more bullying', another classic line from Amb Freeman.
I am glad to see that not all US politicians are crazy.
Thank you Mr. Freeman !
Snowden was not a Traitor! We as a nation didn’t have a whistleblower Protection!!!We would never known that our Country was spying on us!!!
Chas is a legend
I love the respect Chas has for Nima. You can just hear it in his voice/tone
Amb. Freeman has respect for everybody, including the folks he fundamentally and morally disagrees with.
Only a truly respectable man could be that respectful.
Nima, Parabéns pelo teu aniversário, muitos anos de vida, muito sucesso e prosperidade!
Grato por tudo o que fazes em prol da humanidade!
Brilliant discussion, thanks Nima. Happy birthday 🎂 ❤😊
Armani man is a former headchopper......US has this guy in charge. Shameful....
Happy Birthday Nima
I agree Amb. Feeman, Snowden is innocent. That which is not just, is not the law.
RUclips censorship is out of control
Agreed. But strangely when I comment saying this, then suddenly my comments get published. RUclips is deranged 😂.
The management of reality and conformity to the narrative, is detrimental to western civilization. Free speech and open exchange of ideas used to be our strength. No more.
The stupid senator KEEPS interrupting her so he can spew his own propaganda. What a clown.
He would not let her answer. He just used the opportunity to grandstand. He told her it was not about her. True. It was about him😅
The film American Factory illustrates the Ambassador's point, that Americans don't have the work ethic to produce at the level of the Chinese.
Thank you, gentlemen.
Canada absolutely should turn to China. Developing rapid rail with China would open up the geography north of the 50th parallel, thus expanding urban development, resource development, Arctic port development, entrepreneurial spaces, and space for services to all the people who have not had even good cell service!
Canadians have been subjected to a concerted anti-China campaign for several years now - accelerated since Chrystia Freeland gained power in Trudeau's Liberal government. Most Canadians have been thoroughly propagandized to view china with distrust, if not active dislike. It would take a massive shift in our media and government/academic spokespeople before Canadians would support turning to China and BRICS block over allowing USA to exploit us.
Yes Canada the home ofPORNHUB. please get your moral act together you put up with that Trudeau clown like it seems for far to long. Yes blame others from within an echo chamber, just get a mirror and sadly I'm commenting from Australia a place like yours dominated by British arrogance.
Absolutely agree !!
The US needs Canada's oil, so tariffs would be desastrous for the US economy. But tariffs would be a fantastic opportunity for Canada to eventually join the multipolar world...
[Edit : @IrinaFurman (YT comment shuffle)]
Why waste money on tons of money on a wall, for that which can be solved by the stroke of a pen ? Look back to the 80's.
No doubt Trump would exclude Canadian crude and electricity from the tariffs, as there would be a huge outcry from US business otherwise. Hopefully, Canada will refuse to export oil and electricity if Trump goes ahead with tariffs on us.
Michael Bennett's a real piece of work. Treason is the only crime defined in the US Constitution, for a reason. The Founders didn't want it to be used as a political weapon. It can only occur in wartime.
Always great when ambassador Freeman is on. Good show.
The State Dept. is onto marketing it's very own Washing Laundry White Powder in compliance with DOGE 1 cost cutting; it's called DIPLOMAT, an answer to stubborn stains of Policy.😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
I think Amb Freedman needs to revisit the orchestration of 9/11 and the use of Muslim men by the CIA.
In his position it would be unethical.
The narrative battle is lost. It is still to early for JFK. We don't even know who burnt down the German Reich-tag yet.
he cannot do it until it is official nous.
Egypt has already refused the solution of Trump even before Trump propose it
The System makes sure: _Nobody with a conscience gets the Job!_ ...
But allegiance to AIPAC will ger her the job , regardless of other fine positions .
Why not israelis move over to USA and leave Palestine in peace.
They are trying but the zionists won't let them leave.
Correct Question. And here is the answer: Because no one actually wants to have them. *_No one_* ...
_"The Reservat of Israel was created so that the Jws don't come over here."_
*_'It’s time to admit that Arthur Balfour was a white supremacist - and an anti-Semite, too.'_*
_A century ago, 67 words changed the course of history in the Middle East. In a statement that could fit into two tweets, Arthur Balfour, then the British Foreign Secretary, announced that the British government would support establishing a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine._
_One hundred years later, the profound legacy of what became known as the Balfour Declaration continues to define the dynamic between Israelis and Palestinians. And though Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in London this week commemorating the centennial with Theresa May, it’s worth understanding why the Declaration is really nothing worth celebrating._
_Though he may be most known for aiding the Zionist cause in 1917, it’s crucial to remember that Arthur Balfour was a white supremacist. He made that much clear in his own words. In 1906, the British House of Commons was engaged in a debate about the native blacks in South Africa. Nearly all the members of Parliament agreed that the disenfranchisement of the blacks was evil. Not so Balfour, who - almost alone - argued against it._
_“We have to face the facts,” Lord Balfour said. “Men are not born equal, the white and black races are not born with equal capacities: they are born with different capacities which education cannot and will not change.”_
_But Balfour’s troubling views were not limited to Africa. In fact, despite his now iconic support for Zionism, he was not exactly a friend to the Jews. In the late 19th century, pogroms targeting Jews in the Pale of Settlement had led to waves of Jewish flight westward, to England and the United States. This influx of refugees led to an increase in British anti-immigrant racism and outright anti-Semitism - themes not unfamiliar to us today. Support for political action against immigrants grew as the English public demanded immigration control to keep certain immigrants, particularly Jews, out of the country._
_The public found a sympathetic ear in Balfour. In 1905, while serving as Prime Minister, Balfour presided over the passage of the Aliens Act. This legislation put the first restrictions on immigration into Great Britain, and it was primarily aimed at restricting Jewish immigration. According to historians, Balfour had personally delivered passionate speeches about the imperative to restrict the wave of Jews fleeing the Russian Empire from entering Britain._
_It may seem astonishing that Balfour, whose support of the Zionist cause has made him a hero among Jews, would have implemented anti-Jewish laws. But the truth is his support of Zionism stemmed from the exact same source as his desire to limit Jewish immigration to Britain._
_Both can be traced back to his white supremacist beliefs. Balfour lived in an era of stirring nationalism, highly defined by ethno-religious identity. Because of these sentiments, the early 20th century was a time when ostensibly liberal Western nations struggled with the challenge of incorporating Jewish citizens. What the Zionists provided Balfour with was a solution to the challenges Jewish citizens posed to his ethno-nationalist vision, a solution that didn’t force him to reckon with them. Instead of insisting that societies accept all citizens as equals, regardless of racial or religious background, the Zionist movement offered a different answer: separation._
_Balfour saw in Zionism not just a blessing for Jews, but for the West as well. As he wrote in 1919 in his Introduction to Nahum Sokolow’s History of Zionism, the Zionist movement would “mitigate the age-long miseries created for Western civilization by the presence in its midst of a Body which it too long regarded as alien and even hostile, but which it was equally unable to expel or to absorb.”_
_By both giving Jews a place to go and a place to leave, Zionism seemingly solved two problems at once, in Balfour’s mind. In other words, his support of Zionism was motivated to an extent by his desire to protect Britain from the negative effects, the “miseries,” of having Jews in its midst. Rather than protecting the rights of one of its minorities, Britain could simply export them, or at least, not import any more._
_Needless to say, this view of Zionism is steeped in the same kind of white supremacy as Balfour’s view of South Africa’s blacks. But his support of the Zionist dream had another problem. Rather than solving the problem of how to handle a minority living in a white majority country, the Balfour Declaration just shifted the same problem to a different geography._
_For the tension between ethno-nationalism and equality is equally present today between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean sea, where the Israeli state rules over the fate of millions of Palestinians who either have no right to vote, are treated as second-class citizens or are refugees denied repatriation. Today, it is Israel that views Palestinians like myself as “demographic threats”, and sees “the presence in its midst of a Body which it too long regarded as alien and even hostile, but which it was equally unable to expel or to absorb.”_
_That Balfour’s legacy of supremacy persists as much as British support for Israel does is no accident. We have arrived at this point today because the supremacist attitudes of Balfour informed policy, lending imperial might to a project in pursuit of national self-determination for Jews by trampling on the rights of native non-Jews._
_Remarkably, Balfour was unabashedly aware of the hypocrisy of his stance. “The weak point of our position of course is that in the case of Palestine we deliberately and rightly decline to accept the principle of self-determination,” he wrote in a letter to the British prime minister in 1919. “We do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country… the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.”_
_Those Arabs, of course, made up approximately 90 percent of the population. My grandparents were among them._
_Therein lies the fundamental problem that continues through this day, 100 years later. Palestinians are denied the right to have rights because from the outset, their views, their human rights and by extension their very humanity, were consistently seen as inferior to those of others. That was clear in Balfour’s perspective and the British Mandate’s policy. And it persists in one form or another in many of the policies of the state of Israel through this day._
_Today as much as in 1917, the battle between ethno-nationalism and equality, between particularism and universalism, has risen to the foreground, from Donald Trump’s rise in America to Theresa May’s Brexited Britain. Rather than resolving this tension, Balfour’s support for Zionism merely exported it to Palestine._
_Resisting the legacy of his racism will be the key to peace in Palestine/Israel and beyond._
Source: *_FORWARD_* ,Yousef Munayyer, political analyst and writer.
You mean go back to where they came from in the first place.
I like the idea of Greenland - Denmark is supporting the genocide, so it must be sympathetic to the Israelis. Ask them to allow a few million Israelis to settle in Northern Greenland 😂
Que aula magna! ❤
Thanks for your perspective to you both.
Grace, Mercy, Peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.
As always, a very interesting conversation. One thing I do wonder about, when these various experts talk about new treaties, whether for arms control or nuclear non-proliferation, or even a new JCPOA with Iran: is how any country could trust the USA to honour any agreements/treaties? We have seen over and over - actually dating to America's earliest days as a country - that the US government will refute any treaty at any time it decides. As a Canadian, I have seen US decide it no longer likes the terms of treaties with us, as in Trump refusing to abide by the terms of NAFTA, Iran has had USA refuse to abide by the terms of JCPOA, Denmark is now experiencing US denial of their treaty regarding Greenland, and I am sure there are other examples easily found. So what is the point of negotiating a treaty or agreement? Is it just to gain time while strengthening economies and militaries against US?
Like others said, Ambassador Freeman is a wealth of knowledge. He comes on and shares because of you Nima. Dialogue works for Peace.
AI stumbled early on because it was not woke enough. So they spent a lot of time indoctrinating it, now it is a garbage-in/garbage-out product. Open AI will succeed. China also has made significant advances in Quantum Computing, those two combined will be a game changer.
Judging by Nima's beaming smile at the end of this episode, it was a greater pleasure than it usually is
Hey people karma is real Justice they will answer for their actions - if not in this life, then in the next peace.✌️🐯❣️🖼
X📱🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Excellent!
I would like to know what happened with a wall that trump wanted to build in his first turn?
I'm sure the democrats won't pressure Trump about the wall. So, he's safe taking his time or doing next to nothing about it.
@ since the wall he done with, now he’s not going to finish next project, the iron dome. FYI, look how well it worked in Israel
Amb. Freeman is really knowledgeable and eloquent
The accident of the plane and the military helicopter was not the fault of the air traffic controllers. Under no circumstances should a military or any other helicopter or plane be flying through the descending path of an aircraft landing at the airport. This is a ridiculous policy that allows military craft to patrol the river through an active landing zone and should have never been allowed. The bullshit about the air traffic controllers is just a slight of hand by government and media to muddy the water so the real issue of military crossing the flight path is not corrected! get the military helicopters out of that area for good! Period! Otherwise this will surely happen again ans it has been lucky to nave not happened until this point only. Complete craziness on behalf of he military.
Tulsi looks like she just came from the set of the New X-Men movie
Drug testing laws are needed for all elected officials. That Senator was out of line, slurring his words, how embarrassing for our country.
Instead of arming Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan; US tax payer money should be spent on emergency services, infrastructure, healthcare, education, homelessness etc.
Instead of pursuing delusions of grandeur, the US should seek mutually beneficial cooperation with the rest the world.
Question to senator; Is Netanyahu a war criminal guilty of genocide by 99.9% of the world? Yes or No. Answer G damn it! 😂
Bennett would have fitted in as an appatik during Stalins purges.A very obnoxious bullying person.
How can you not be opposed to racial discrimination disguised as a DEI Program and the promotion of weird gender ideology indoctrination and paid for with Taxpayer money?
❤❤❤
Why doesn't she get loud on that rude *_suit&tie-guy??_* She's a soldier! ... ^^
Apparently there's a crime called contempt of Congress and people actually go to jail for it (e.g. Steve Bannon)
A camel is a horse designed by a committee. A platypus is a bird put together by bureaucrats. An elephant is a mouse built to military specifications. A shrimp is a fish conceived in the legislative process. More often than not, a foreign policy is a course of action devised by a committee of bureaucrats and military men under the oversight of a legislature. Not surprisingly, such a thing defies simple description.
- Amb. Chas Freeman, _The Diplomat's Dictionary_
👑🐯 People firstly tell you're Kids to put down the weapons and the animosity,antagonism,dislike,
enmity,hatred,
hostility, and pick up some book's 📚 if people aren't going to fight and defend their own history well you know the outcome to that. also look at the word's you use to Express Yourself young people that's what's going to change your life and always dream big were making history everyday for the up and coming generation's instead of them scratching there head saying why me or pointing finger's at anyone else. Keep fighting🥊keep winning🏆shining🌟keep smiling😊 may God Almighty grace and blessing uplift you we're from the beautiful 🇻🇳 jungle peace.✌️🐯❣️
🌴🐅🖼🖌👋🐯🖐📱X
which country's alow kids to have weapons ?
_"Is Edward Snowden a traitor y/n?"_
She didn't say *_"No."_*
She wants the job.
... :)
A stupid question. Has your dad stopped beating his wife ? Yes or No ?
he is objecteur de conscience.. confronted by secrecy and illegality, and lying under oath about it! confronting the still unpunished lies and the secret illegal abuse. As she still does confronting those pretending(corrupt) jerks.
when the rubber hits the road .... such a way w words 😄define traitor,Senator Douchebag ???
Political theater 😂
💛
🎯
The American arrogance is unstoppable
Presenting herself in White = the color of innocence. Everything on Grabhard cries *_'deceive'_* ...
In some cultures white is the colour of death, not innocence. Don't let your imagination cloud your intelligence!
@@lornamackay4069 I perceive her as a member of the western cultural hemisphere. At least she does everything to get a highpayed job in it. So i guess that *_'White'_* stands for *_'innocent angle'_* ... ^^
genius
DeepSeekAI launched on inauguration day. Coincidence, highly unlikely.
What’s a point to say Syrians are not Arabs. Just like saying Hungarian are not European.
26:54 naked capitalism
This was a really great episode. I really appreciate it. I have felt lost for the last couple of weeks so this really helped anchor me again to current events.
24 hours from Tulsy , she's ace, so the ambassador and you nema
What is a "traditional Arab dictator"? Does he look like a Donald Trump? Or a George W. Bush? Or is it something that exists in the head of the speaker alone? Please avoid stereotypes of any sort.