AMD might just be one of the greatest companies in these current times. Nvidia is out here sabotaging themselves while AMD is helping any older GPUs no matter the brand.
Funny thing is, AMD is making Intel actually pull of a struggle and compete for double digit money. Still, not enough, we need then fighting to those last five bucks.
@@RinoAP well there are some but it's rare. Mostly software where they have no real competition but still sell it for a fair price with good user support
I have a workstation that is a i3-6320. I plan to upgrade the motherboard and CPU to a i5-14400 because it will be the LAST platform that will support DDR4. So the 14th gen is well suited to that use case
My 13900kf will do 6.2 on one core and 6.1 on 2 cores and 6.0 on 3 cores 5.9 5.8 on 2. Until it dries out the thermal paste and starts getting warm and then I'll turn off the overclocking and then it'll get worse and then I'll repaste it and the cycle repeats.
What the AntiLag+ issue does show is the shortcomings in the game engines to begin with. It looks to work on a similar principle to Reshade, I'm sure a workaround could be implemented quite quickly. As for AFMF, it's a work in progress, so deficiencies are expected. I'm not sure to what level the next frame is rendered to get the motion detail. It only really needs partial rendering, so a fluid frame could be inserted as the next frame is finalised, possibly? In any case, it's only a preview at the moment. I'm sure they're checking out the feedback of reviewers for any issues they may not be aware of.
exactly what I was thinking. 11th Gen lost to 10th gen in some applications. Doubt that will be the case for 14th gen since it's mostly up clocked 13th gen. That doesn't make the 14th gen CPUs an attractive buy however. Just not the worst thing intel has ever done.
No issues currently with Antilag+ with the new AFMF beta driver not even any crashing, Valve needs to realize that it's this and make their VAC software let it through, VAC sucks anyway it doesn't ban actual cheaters, but valve blaming AMD for it, I think the way AMD is implementing it is the only way to get it to work, so it's gonna be a problem.
bro u cant blame vac for this. anti lag literally detours dlls. if amd gave a heads up to valve and told them about anti lag im sure this wouldnt have happened
The job of an Anti-Cheat is to detect if a player is cheating. The player should be free to do whatever he wants and run whatever software or hardware he likes as long as he doesn't cheat. If the Anti-Cheat claims something that isn't a cheat to be a cheat, then your Anti-Cheat is shit. Why do we pretend that Valve's VAC is some godlike AC when in fact its been riddled with massive failures for years now? I don't blame AMD at all for this, VAC is just shit and so are most ACs.
That honestly sucks for anyone getting banned for using anti-lag plus. It's odd a new technology like this could get people banned, I mean whatever reason the anti-cheat software gives. that reason it says that is related to anti-lag plus anyone banned for using such should unbanned. Other than that sucks that the I5 rumors were false.
I think 14th Gen was what Raptor Lake was supposed to be all along. Intel just rushed it out early as a response to the 5800X3D because therr was only ten months between it and Alder Lake. They were then counting on Meteor Lake for a huge uplift on a new socket but it wasn't working out, so they tidied up Raptor Lake to stall for time until Arrow Lake is ready. If you hadn't moved onto that socket with 12th Gen, then 14th gen is a pretty good straight upgrade, but it'll be an EoL just like the 5800X3D and AM4. The smarter move would be to pick up a decent mid range AM5 board this Black Friday, pair it with something like a 7700(X), and then hope that Zen 6 gives a really good uplift over Zen 4/5 for a really meaningful EoL update for only the cost of a new CPU.
Another AMD booster channel. If your games already don't push the potential of a CPU because it is so powerful, or the game is not well optimized then you will never see the new power of a new chip on the single game benchmark specially what is CLEARLY labeled as a refresh. What I know is that Windows 11 likes to schedule my eCores first. I have 4 of them so 8 or 12 eCores may not Make Witcher run faster but the bottleneck I see during machine start up would be reduced. But keep selling single game bench marks in a multitasking world.
Dang this was disappointing I honestly thought the rumors that the i5 would get a core count increase was at least true but darn this is really just 13th gen all over again with a slight OC.
Who uses Intel in 2023 anyway? Ryzen are just too good, and now with the upcoming snapdragon X series, forget about it, Intel is out of the chat for at least the next two to four years.
@@dzibanart8521dude the world is not the US alone where prices are great and the PS5 is just 500$ it's different for the rest of us. Intel having DDR4 support allows us to save a lot of money here as a DDR4 MOBO is cheaper and DDR5 is still ridiculously expensive here a 32GB kit is around 200-300$ while a 32GB DDR4 is around 100-130$ and please I have seen the reviews and the difference between DDR4 and DDR5 on intel is minimal at best like 3-5% on most apps and games except the Spider-Man games which gets 5-10% or more performance the faster the DDR5 kit you have also Sony increased PS5 prices everywhere else except the US. Ryzen 7000 is just too expensive even the cheapest MOBOS is over 100$ here while a basic Intel DDR4 board is 50$ from MSI or GIGABYTE.
it doesn't work All the games I tested in every configuration had on average of 10-20FPS less than when I had it completely off, with noticeably high latency and yes, everything updated
Calling 14th Gen Intel's worst CPU release, ever is just flat out wrong. How in the hell you can claim that it's worse than 11th Gen is blowing my mind. Or some of the early Pentium series back in the late 90's/early 2000's for that matter.
@@bal7ha2ar 14700k sounds more appealing since I'm gonna stick with it for the next 4-6 gens so might as well get the newest one but I'm not gonna pass on a good deal on a 13700k if I happen upon one
As i see it 14th gen is only worth the upgrade if you need the fastest ram possible when using either 2 sticks or 4 sticks for certain use cases if the use cases even exist which im not sure they do
sugi0lover just posted his results on the 14900K and the new Apex board. Basically useless, still running the same 8800 CL 36 as his 13900K and can't stabilize 9000 RAM.
honestly, probably, but like they said in the video you probably should watch a review or two first when they come out just to get a better sense of things
@@js460 Why spend an extra few hundred dollars when I can get within a couple hundred mHz of the 14th gen? Benchmarks are showing the 14900K is the same as a 13900KS with 100 mHz advantage at the same voltage and power draw. Damn, 14th gen is not at all impressive.
Does that mean that i might get banned if i use this feature on older unsupported gpu's like r9 gpu's or hd series with anti-lag feature ? Or this is issue only on the newer drivers on the newer gpu's ?
The Drivers mentions about AMD. You FORGOT that the " BOT Auto Aim/Instakill " is on the same line as AMD`s Graphic updates & the Sever`s ARE Picking it up WRONG!
I wonder when dlss 3.5 is gonna be added to games? Currently it's only added in cyberpunk 2077. Dlss 3.5 ray reconstruction works on all RTX gpus as nvidia said.
I have a i5 12400F and was thinking 14600KF is an good upgrade if i can get it for 200€ (after i sale the current cpu) feel like a good upgrade for my current pc (6600xt with gigabyte b660 motherboard a d crossair vengeance 32000MHZ any opinions?
As someone who just purchased a rx 590 to create a budget build I'll keep that in mind, either way..I done regret swinging my side because amd supports older drives still!
I'm indifferent on frame generation - currently I don't need it and my GPU/CPU combination have no troubles keeping the frame rate where I want it. Truthfully I think it's a bit sad that people these days are getting excited over it - I'd rather play the game as the dev's designed the game to be played then have my GPU manufacturer give me a facsimile of how they think the dev's intended the game to look... Though I don't object to a performance boost if it means I can stretch out the use of card a little longer (I generally upgrade every other generation - though the longest card I used would got back to the 2000's where my GeForce 6600 GT served me very well for 6 years as opposed to my more normal 4 year cycle).
this is exactly the way I feel about this frame generation bullshit and stupid upscaling algorithms, those 2 features can become very useful in a few years when our cards start to feel old, but until then fuck all that bullshit it just gives game devs one more reason to not care about optimizing their games
Out of curiosity, could it be used for performance if the artificially generated frames were generated at lower fidelity but object detail geometries, like edges and lines were generated at higher fidelity. Your eyes can only see about 40+ frames a second so if these artificial frames were inserted at the right intervals you wouldn't need to constantly generate high fidelity frames in every frame to get higher performance correct?
Actually feel sorry for Nvidia only upgrading the AI side of their GPUs. More productive to offer $100m to anyone/group who can advance graphic technology without AI.
I’m close to getting my first pc, so bare with, but will the 14th Generation Intel Core i5 14600KF run well on a RXT 4070 Nvidia GPU? If anyone could let me know that would be great 👍
I use a product / game called MSFS-2020 among other racing games.....Single core 6GHz should work good, I think I can use the Intel utility to control the cores that the game uses if memory serves me right. (can't remember the name). But my goal is to take out my 12900K from my Z690 DDR5 Mother Board (it's a ROG Strix "E") and put the 14900K into the existing mobo CPU socket and then put the Corsair closed-loop cooling back onto the new chip, taking the 12900K out and seeing about selling it (I have the original packaging) hoping to gain 1 entire Gigahertz (I'm currently sitting at 5.0 GHz on a good day-in turbo mode in the BIOS settings). I also try to use the XMP but some people tell me to turn that off. If I remember correctly, my memory is some of the early Trident Z5 DDR5 F5-6000U4040E16GX2-TZ5RS (DDR5-6000 16GBx2). CL 40-40-40-76. 1.30v Memory. So I'd like to pop in this new Intel chip (14900K) and see if that gives me more lanes on my PCI bus and faster graphics for my gaming. If I need to upgrade to 64GB RAM from 32GB RAM, let me know that as well and thanks so much for all the help !!!
Switched from Intel to AMD 7800x3d. Best ever. The 13900k and 14900k are jokes to me. I almost went 13900k and just didn’t make sense. I also was looking at 7900x or above but those aren’t as fast as 7800x3d for gaming. You know what though? 7800x3d shreds video editing and encoding just fine and it’s fast! Win win team Amd. Intel, you messed up and now the world has called you out. Haha
For gaming AMD is nobrainer. But if you are pro with many USB devices and Thunderbolt devices, AMD is not the good path. Too many problems. Especially with TB devices for audio
@@andivax One issue I only have with amd is restart vs shutdown on windows 11. I can restart my intel 100's of times never an issue. AMD? I restart and it doesn't boot, I have to force shutdown by holding power button down. Windows update? Same. Stupid thing will update and shutdown, but it doesn't really shutdown instead it restats. Weird voodoo I tell you.
See saying don't buy, is just gay, there's a scenario under which it makes sense to buy, like if you have 9th or 10th gen and you want to upgrade it makes sense as the 14900k is the 13900ks for $200 - $300 cheaper, so it makes sense from that point of view. Yes it's a lack lustre release, makes you think of 11th gen, like Intel are just releasing something to release something.
I saw the thumbnail and thought you received a 14th Gen series CPU for testing and it was dead on arrival. It was publicly stated by Intel that 14th Gen is a refresh and not a new architecture. Idea behind refreshes is to optimize and improve existing technology. In the very least its not 14nm++++++++++ As far as AMD is concerned. Lets say you are the average joe who does not know much about comps, but buys an AMD prebuild with this technology in order to play games.. So you start up a game and end up with a VAC Ban. That alone would have me return the whole system and ask for a refund. If I am an average joe and come across this video, the message is "If I buy and play AMD out of the box, I can get banned" Rather than learn how to disable "Anti-Lag" I will just buy Intel instead... is the mentality people are going to have. AMD really needs to stop shooting themselves in the foot.
Intel's 14th Gen is not a significant boost over 13th Gen? If we follow historical logic, Intel must be "resting on its laurels". Really, x86 has hit is limits. The 8-bit machine code needs to die. AMD's Anti-Lag? I don't use it anyway. As for AMD's driver based frame generation, I don't care for it. The only driver features that are of interest to me were AMD's Virtual Super Resolution (monitor is treated as a higher resolution than supported and downscaled to monitor's resolution) and Crossfire (driver combines 2 GPUs to treat as a single GPU to applications, providing its means of load splitting. Really, it needs a dynamic screen splitting mode).
Who would be stupid enough to play with antilag on CS2😂 That game can push hundreds of fps Just cap it according to ur refresh rate it's enough Valve really shud just put in fsr2/fsr3 in-game to help older gen gpus get 144fps
Not to happy with AMD; I got a RX 6700 non XT and im right now RMA it since I barely got 13 months casually playing Warzone and SMITE and netflix, the GPU is Dying!. I get Green squared and lines on my youtube videos, my PC Freezes now and then, and when playing warzone I can't have anything else open or I get Screen Flickering in Green/gray-ish color. and its not my 750w PSU , my RAM, or my new Gen 4 NVME, neighter my CPU, I had a professional test my Gear and it was all down to the GPU. Mmmm, 1 year AMD, really?. Im giving AMD 1 more chance with this 7800XT card. I never had Issues with Nvidia before. lets see what's up.
14th gen is 13th gen 'refresh' what did you expect? A new world?!???? 🤣LOL. 😉 It is just max refined and tuned up, 12/13th gen chip= the best it can be and this is normal. So you SHOULD buy it, if you have 12th or older gen and need performance. That's why also the pricing is the same as last year, even tho world economics has changed alot! P.S. Get your cry's ready as 15th gen what will be on new platform, so new milking opportunity + with the world economics, that manufacturing and everything else just costs more, IT WILL BE priced much higher ( i expect at least +20% increase) If you can buy i7 '600k' 13 and 14th gen for ~450€ in stores now, then expect that 15th gen i7 will cost at least 550€! 😉And this will be across all the lineup.
You just sounded like Nvidia marketing. Except in regard to AMD. We just got huge performance boost... with DLSS3... sorry AFMF... except they suck your precious things badly. Go watch Hardware Unboxed or something if you can't be bothered doing tests yourself?
“Dont install AMDs newest drivers, and AMD just unleashed the floodgates of performance”
This is why Nvidia is selling expensive GPU
That's just AMD being AMD.
More like the floodgates of bans
AMD might just be one of the greatest companies in these current times. Nvidia is out here sabotaging themselves while AMD is helping any older GPUs no matter the brand.
Funny thing is, AMD is making Intel actually pull of a struggle and compete for double digit money.
Still, not enough, we need then fighting to those last five bucks.
You know that amd isn't a good company right? They do it cause they have no other choice. If nvidea was in amds position they would do the same
Hahahaha RIP AMD
@@kecksbelit3300 technically no company is a good company, so, yeah
@@RinoAP well there are some but it's rare. Mostly software where they have no real competition but still sell it for a fair price with good user support
Do NOT BUY Intel's New 14th Gen CPUs,,
Preceded by a commercial to buy Intel CPUs...
Hilarious.
AMD anti lag testers should have tried it in the type of game that technology is primarily aimed at: FPS shooters online.
Anti lag is really good for Rocket League and sim drift games from my experience
@@SideQuest3ya but getting your customers getting banned from games...isn't all that cool
Just FYI - machines that do that sort of pre-alpha and production are not connected to the internet to avoid leaks!
Yeah and end up with a VAC Ban along with your $2000 inventory
I have a workstation that is a i3-6320. I plan to upgrade the motherboard and CPU to a i5-14400 because it will be the LAST platform that will support DDR4. So the 14th gen is well suited to that use case
new cpu; new motherboard, so take new ram for future proof; faster better and new life
@@young-j731 it only runs shipping software and google sheets. I'm only upgrading because it isn't eligible for a W11 upgrade.
@@codegame027I wouldn’t bother buying a 14th gen then if it’s not doing much it’s not worth spending extra
@@mudiedj a 14400 shouldn't be more than 200-225 usd. I think its a perfect use-case
@@codegame027ughh just do the registry tweaks
My 13900kf will do 6.2 on one core and 6.1 on 2 cores and 6.0 on 3 cores 5.9 5.8 on 2. Until it dries out the thermal paste and starts getting warm and then I'll turn off the overclocking and then it'll get worse and then I'll repaste it and the cycle repeats.
What the AntiLag+ issue does show is the shortcomings in the game engines to begin with. It looks to work on a similar principle to Reshade, I'm sure a workaround could be implemented quite quickly.
As for AFMF, it's a work in progress, so deficiencies are expected. I'm not sure to what level the next frame is rendered to get the motion detail. It only really needs partial rendering, so a fluid frame could be inserted as the next frame is finalised, possibly?
In any case, it's only a preview at the moment. I'm sure they're checking out the feedback of reviewers for any issues they may not be aware of.
The worst ever? Anyone remember the 11th gen?
exactly what I was thinking. 11th Gen lost to 10th gen in some applications. Doubt that will be the case for 14th gen since it's mostly up clocked 13th gen. That doesn't make the 14th gen CPUs an attractive buy however. Just not the worst thing intel has ever done.
Gotta get those clicks 😵💫
11th gen was an increase in IPC, only the top i9s were bad, i5s were especially good. This is better.
i'm sick of having to skip through the video to get the news and avoid sponsor spam
There's one thing I can recommend to you, SponsorBlock.
Well when u start a business u can let ur customers skip the check out n just walk away with ur products 😂
We gotta let the man pay his bills. Its a 1 minute ad...
you get what you deserve. No content creator can live without ad revenue, even Mr. Beast
Just use sponsor block lol. It auto skips most sponsor spots in videos for me.
No issues currently with Antilag+ with the new AFMF beta driver not even any crashing, Valve needs to realize that it's this and make their VAC software let it through, VAC sucks anyway it doesn't ban actual cheaters, but valve blaming AMD for it, I think the way AMD is implementing it is the only way to get it to work, so it's gonna be a problem.
bro u cant blame vac for this. anti lag literally detours dlls. if amd gave a heads up to valve and told them about anti lag im sure this wouldnt have happened
@@plasmahvh Yes I can, it can't properly detect cheaters like 80% of the time, but bans people for using legit software from a GPU manufacturer.
@@bes12000 legit software isn't detouring dlls you know.
VAC is bullshit
The job of an Anti-Cheat is to detect if a player is cheating. The player should be free to do whatever he wants and run whatever software or hardware he likes as long as he doesn't cheat. If the Anti-Cheat claims something that isn't a cheat to be a cheat, then your Anti-Cheat is shit.
Why do we pretend that Valve's VAC is some godlike AC when in fact its been riddled with massive failures for years now? I don't blame AMD at all for this, VAC is just shit and so are most ACs.
That honestly sucks for anyone getting banned for using anti-lag plus. It's odd a new technology like this could get people banned, I mean whatever reason the anti-cheat software gives. that reason it says that is related to anti-lag plus anyone banned for using such should unbanned. Other than that sucks that the I5 rumors were false.
I think 14th Gen was what Raptor Lake was supposed to be all along. Intel just rushed it out early as a response to the 5800X3D because therr was only ten months between it and Alder Lake. They were then counting on Meteor Lake for a huge uplift on a new socket but it wasn't working out, so they tidied up Raptor Lake to stall for time until Arrow Lake is ready.
If you hadn't moved onto that socket with 12th Gen, then 14th gen is a pretty good straight upgrade, but it'll be an EoL just like the 5800X3D and AM4. The smarter move would be to pick up a decent mid range AM5 board this Black Friday, pair it with something like a 7700(X), and then hope that Zen 6 gives a really good uplift over Zen 4/5 for a really meaningful EoL update for only the cost of a new CPU.
Doesn't the 14700K come with more -ecores, relative to the 13700k, at the same price? And its faster? Sounds like a win to me. =/
We talking about the i5 n below
I7 n up just get more cores n power draw
@@NeVErseeNMeLikEDis i9 has the same amount of cores. Only i7 gets an increase
only the i7 is good.
You'll have to swap the motherboard if you decide to upgrade even in a year
@@phantom0590 If. You also could just get a CPU and keep it and not upgrade.
Another AMD booster channel. If your games already don't push the potential of a CPU because it is so powerful, or the game is not well optimized then you will never see the new power of a new chip on the single game benchmark specially what is CLEARLY labeled as a refresh. What I know is that Windows 11 likes to schedule my eCores first. I have 4 of them so 8 or 12 eCores may not Make Witcher run faster but the bottleneck I see during machine start up would be reduced.
But keep selling single game bench marks in a multitasking world.
Dang this was disappointing I honestly thought the rumors that the i5 would get a core count increase was at least true but darn this is really just 13th gen all over again with a slight OC.
Who uses Intel in 2023 anyway? Ryzen are just too good, and now with the upcoming snapdragon X series, forget about it, Intel is out of the chat for at least the next two to four years.
@@dzibanart8521 funfact, intel is cheaper for budget build, at least in my country. Not having Ryzen 3 and below on AM5 hurts AMD selling here
Content creators and Productive work that uses softwares@@dzibanart8521
@@dzibanart8521dude the world is not the US alone where prices are great and the PS5 is just 500$ it's different for the rest of us. Intel having DDR4 support allows us to save a lot of money here as a DDR4 MOBO is cheaper and DDR5 is still ridiculously expensive here a 32GB kit is around 200-300$ while a 32GB DDR4 is around 100-130$ and please I have seen the reviews and the difference between DDR4 and DDR5 on intel is minimal at best like 3-5% on most apps and games except the Spider-Man games which gets 5-10% or more performance the faster the DDR5 kit you have also Sony increased PS5 prices everywhere else except the US. Ryzen 7000 is just too expensive even the cheapest MOBOS is over 100$ here while a basic Intel DDR4 board is 50$ from MSI or GIGABYTE.
@@dzibanart8521 is ryzen is a dogshit next i will stick to intel
We all knew 14th gen was gonna suck n suck more power too
SMH
12th Gen and 13th Gen has a lag issue did they at least fix that issue on 14th gen ?
What are you talking about?
Lag issue?
Should I upgrade from i5 4590 to i9 14900k is it good?
I've been noticing that every once in a while I have display issues. Coincidentally there is a driver update at the same time. AMD 6000.
So you update your drivers immediately and have issues and keep doing it over and over again? 😂
Use DDU to clean all drivers, then install the latest one cleanly
"Do NOT BUY Intel’s New 14th Gen CPUs!" and then there is entire 14th gen lineup affiliate links 😂hey mans gotta make money alright
Steve from GN enters the chat
it doesn't work
All the games I tested in every configuration had on average of 10-20FPS less than when I had it completely off, with noticeably high latency
and yes, everything updated
Calling 14th Gen Intel's worst CPU release, ever is just flat out wrong. How in the hell you can claim that it's worse than 11th Gen is blowing my mind. Or some of the early Pentium series back in the late 90's/early 2000's for that matter.
Still waiting for fsr3's SDK
dont buy 12gen dont buy 13gen dont buy 14gen , mate can you make some better of cpu ?
@@JayzBeerz no like audi , only bmw sorry
Is antilag+ also come to RX 6000?
btw i wanna see fsr3 working like the fsr1(beenig universal)
im still hoping for it. 14th gen 40 series just sounds great.
A real surprise of nVidia would to have a high end product for 1000 bugs. 🤣
Should I upgrade from 9700k to the 14700k(f)? I'm getting some cpu bottlenecks with Starfield and Darktide. I have the RTX 3090
i would upgrade tbh. wait for reviews tho and see if you can snipe a 13700k for cheap
@@bal7ha2ar 14700k sounds more appealing since I'm gonna stick with it for the next 4-6 gens so might as well get the newest one but I'm not gonna pass on a good deal on a 13700k if I happen upon one
As i see it 14th gen is only worth the upgrade if you need the fastest ram possible when using either 2 sticks or 4 sticks for certain use cases if the use cases even exist which im not sure they do
sugi0lover just posted his results on the 14900K and the new Apex board. Basically useless, still running the same 8800 CL 36 as his 13900K and can't stabilize 9000 RAM.
@@mcgmgcoh well then
So, I'd be better off going from 12th to 13th gen i9 and overclocking it to ballpark a 14th gen i9?
honestly, probably, but like they said in the video you probably should watch a review or two first when they come out just to get a better sense of things
No, just get the newest part.
@@js460 Why spend an extra few hundred dollars when I can get within a couple hundred mHz of the 14th gen? Benchmarks are showing the 14900K is the same as a 13900KS with 100 mHz advantage at the same voltage and power draw. Damn, 14th gen is not at all impressive.
@@js460 That is literally the most illiterate reply ever.
Does that mean that i might get banned if i use this feature on older unsupported gpu's like r9 gpu's or hd series with anti-lag feature ? Or this is issue only on the newer drivers on the newer gpu's ?
its only the new anti-lag+ the non + has been here for a while
Any idea if there is gonne be a 14900KS version???
Then i might consider swaping my 13700K
There will be but i recommend you wait for the new ryzen CPU's if you would like a actual faster/proper upgrade
@@pcpartpickerontopAgreed. Zen 5 comes out Q2 2024. 14900KS will be 5% faster than 13900KS maybe.
@@tringuyen7519 nope, it'll be 3% faster.
ive tested the amfm on my rx 6600 one sad thing is you can't use rsr and amfm at the same time
The Drivers mentions about AMD.
You FORGOT that the " BOT Auto Aim/Instakill " is on the same line as AMD`s Graphic updates & the Sever`s ARE Picking it up WRONG!
Already preorder it 6ghz + here I come!
I wonder when dlss 3.5 is gonna be added to games? Currently it's only added in cyberpunk 2077. Dlss 3.5 ray reconstruction works on all RTX gpus as nvidia said.
Top end RTX 6000 likely to come with HBM4, now that will be a beast!
And with UpScaling maybe it just wont matter anymore… 😂
@@leosi5888 16k screens per eye running at 240fps, we will still need upscaling!
but it will probably cost you your soul
@@Tzofeh I think all Nvidia products cost you that!
I have AMD's 23.10.1 driver on my 6600, disabled Anti lag in CS2 and I'm fine
because anti lag+ is only available on 7000 series and anti lag =/= anti lag+
14900kek edition
How much difference does 200MHz actually make? Enough to even notice it?
It's a little over 3%, so it won't be noticeable except in benchmarks.
14 gen is just to fill the gap between 13 gen and 15th
I have a i5 12400F and was thinking 14600KF is an good upgrade if i can get it for 200€ (after i sale the current cpu) feel like a good upgrade for my current pc (6600xt with gigabyte b660 motherboard a d crossair vengeance 32000MHZ any opinions?
As someone who just purchased a rx 590 to create a budget build I'll keep that in mind, either way..I done regret swinging my side because amd supports older drives still!
LOL figures. a four hour old video, and I just pre ordered the i7 14700k 2 hours ago... I guess, wish me luck?
You're fine bud. Clickback for views.
First world's problems. "How bad this release is!" Really? It was always expected to be a refresh, nothing more.
I'm indifferent on frame generation - currently I don't need it and my GPU/CPU combination have no troubles keeping the frame rate where I want it. Truthfully I think it's a bit sad that people these days are getting excited over it - I'd rather play the game as the dev's designed the game to be played then have my GPU manufacturer give me a facsimile of how they think the dev's intended the game to look... Though I don't object to a performance boost if it means I can stretch out the use of card a little longer (I generally upgrade every other generation - though the longest card I used would got back to the 2000's where my GeForce 6600 GT served me very well for 6 years as opposed to my more normal 4 year cycle).
this is exactly the way I feel about this frame generation bullshit and stupid upscaling algorithms, those 2 features can become very useful in a few years when our cards start to feel old, but until then fuck all that bullshit it just gives game devs one more reason to not care about optimizing their games
@@brunodinis7454 Yeah why would anyone want extra FPS....
@@brunodinis7454exactly.
What a huge amount of DISINFORMATION
I still wish that every time I save up money to get a new graphics card that it would actually get to be spent on a new graphics card. 😑
Afmf is good but doesn't work along rsr :'c tragic
Huge uplift... in power consumption... Especially compared to AMDs offerings.
not really on gamers nexus charts it actually used less power than the 13900k under full load... go watch the vid... its only 15w less tho haha.
Frame generation does NOT increase performance. It only increases visual smoothness (when it works well) while decreasing performance, a bit.
Out of curiosity, could it be used for performance if the artificially generated frames were generated at lower fidelity but object detail geometries, like edges and lines were generated at higher fidelity. Your eyes can only see about 40+ frames a second so if these artificial frames were inserted at the right intervals you wouldn't need to constantly generate high fidelity frames in every frame to get higher performance correct?
I've had a few drinks but let me see if I understand. Do not install latest amd drivers and also latest drivers great news?
CPU prices are expensive because it needs ram 5, new boards, ect...
i wouldn't upgrade from 13th-14th, but 12 or earlier, especially if moving up from i5/i7 absolutely
Actually feel sorry for Nvidia only upgrading the AI side of their GPUs. More productive to offer $100m to anyone/group who can advance graphic technology without AI.
I’m close to getting my first pc, so bare with, but will the 14th Generation Intel Core i5 14600KF run well on a RXT 4070 Nvidia GPU? If anyone could let me know that would be great 👍
I use a product / game called MSFS-2020 among other racing games.....Single core 6GHz should work good, I think I can use the Intel utility to control the cores that the game uses if memory serves me right. (can't remember the name). But my goal is to take out my 12900K from my Z690 DDR5 Mother Board (it's a ROG Strix "E") and put the 14900K into the existing mobo CPU socket and then put the Corsair closed-loop cooling back onto the new chip, taking the 12900K out and seeing about selling it (I have the original packaging) hoping to gain 1 entire Gigahertz (I'm currently sitting at 5.0 GHz on a good day-in turbo mode in the BIOS settings). I also try to use the XMP but some people tell me to turn that off. If I remember correctly, my memory is some of the early Trident Z5 DDR5 F5-6000U4040E16GX2-TZ5RS (DDR5-6000 16GBx2). CL 40-40-40-76. 1.30v Memory. So I'd like to pop in this new Intel chip (14900K) and see if that gives me more lanes on my PCI bus and faster graphics for my gaming. If I need to upgrade to 64GB RAM from 32GB RAM, let me know that as well and thanks so much for all the help !!!
Weird, I have the newest drivers and have no issues. Haven't been VAC Banned yet LOL. Oh, and I still ordered a 14th gen. Oh well.
Man, i got my 14700k for $260 from micro center. Worth it.
Aw man, i wanted a 14700k.
No contact.
Just record any cybercrime
Already bought a 14900k. But I'm upgrading from a 12700k tbf
I'm rather interested in Intel Meteor lake than Raptor Lake refresh.
I'm actually happy with 12700k. No point in upgrading to 14700k.
AMD is the "Good Guy Greg" meme.
Switched from Intel to AMD 7800x3d. Best ever. The 13900k and 14900k are jokes to me. I almost went 13900k and just didn’t make sense. I also was looking at 7900x or above but those aren’t as fast as 7800x3d for gaming.
You know what though? 7800x3d shreds video editing and encoding just fine and it’s fast! Win win team Amd. Intel, you messed up and now the world has called you out. Haha
For gaming AMD is nobrainer. But if you are pro with many USB devices and Thunderbolt devices, AMD is not the good path. Too many problems. Especially with TB devices for audio
@@andivax One issue I only have with amd is restart vs shutdown on windows 11. I can restart my intel 100's of times never an issue. AMD? I restart and it doesn't boot, I have to force shutdown by holding power button down. Windows update? Same. Stupid thing will update and shutdown, but it doesn't really shutdown instead it restats.
Weird voodoo I tell you.
See saying don't buy, is just gay, there's a scenario under which it makes sense to buy, like if you have 9th or 10th gen and you want to upgrade it makes sense as the 14900k is the 13900ks for $200 - $300 cheaper, so it makes sense from that point of view. Yes it's a lack lustre release, makes you think of 11th gen, like Intel are just releasing something to release something.
What you're missing is the lower TDP and power usage over 13thgen...
So runs cooler with same perf and price, that's huge
I saw the thumbnail and thought you received a 14th Gen series CPU for testing and it was dead on arrival.
It was publicly stated by Intel that 14th Gen is a refresh and not a new architecture.
Idea behind refreshes is to optimize and improve existing technology.
In the very least its not 14nm++++++++++
As far as AMD is concerned.
Lets say you are the average joe who does not know much about comps, but
buys an AMD prebuild with this technology in order to play games..
So you start up a game and end up with a VAC Ban.
That alone would have me return the whole system and ask for a refund.
If I am an average joe and come across this video, the message is
"If I buy and play AMD out of the box, I can get banned"
Rather than learn how to disable "Anti-Lag" I will just buy Intel instead...
is the mentality people are going to have.
AMD really needs to stop shooting themselves in the foot.
the only cpu worth buying from the intel 14th gen is the i7 14700k as it has more cores compared to the i7 13700k..
Will 13th Gen CPUs have a price drop soon?
"Dead on Arrival" . No, It's " Arrived on Motherboard Dead" = AMD. 🤔
They should have also increased the i5 e cores also. It would have sold like hot cake.
When the difference between i5 and i7 is less than $100, why would anyone buy an i5?
@@js460 LOL, don't you get it ? Increase the no. of cores in I5 for the the same price right now.
Dont install amds new driver is very hyperbole. You can turn off the setting easily and is very nice in other games that wont ban you.
Intel's 14th Gen is not a significant boost over 13th Gen? If we follow historical logic, Intel must be "resting on its laurels". Really, x86 has hit is limits. The 8-bit machine code needs to die.
AMD's Anti-Lag? I don't use it anyway.
As for AMD's driver based frame generation, I don't care for it.
The only driver features that are of interest to me were AMD's Virtual Super Resolution (monitor is treated as a higher resolution than supported and downscaled to monitor's resolution) and Crossfire (driver combines 2 GPUs to treat as a single GPU to applications, providing its means of load splitting. Really, it needs a dynamic screen splitting mode).
I come from ‘Do not buy AMD’s cpu.’
AMD - How about Vulkan support?
amd gpus have had vulkan support for a looong time already
so um
what?
Pick AMD pick AMD pick AMD, Get BANNED get BANNED GET BANNED
last DDR4 intel CPU
Who would be stupid enough to play with antilag on CS2😂
That game can push hundreds of fps
Just cap it according to ur refresh rate it's enough
Valve really shud just put in fsr2/fsr3 in-game to help older gen gpus get 144fps
Hm i cant wait to see my 5800x3d outperform 14400....
Catching a cold?
my 12900K died on me so I preordered
wait hynix is still alive and nvidea for some reason bets on it? facepalm
Not to happy with AMD; I got a RX 6700 non XT and im right now RMA it since I barely got 13 months casually playing Warzone and SMITE and netflix, the GPU is Dying!. I get Green squared and lines on my youtube videos, my PC Freezes now and then, and when playing warzone I can't have anything else open or I get Screen Flickering in Green/gray-ish color. and its not my 750w PSU , my RAM, or my new Gen 4 NVME, neighter my CPU, I had a professional test my Gear and it was all down to the GPU. Mmmm, 1 year AMD, really?. Im giving AMD 1 more chance with this 7800XT card. I never had Issues with Nvidia before. lets see what's up.
Lol he butchered sk hynix (pronounced hynex)
I have a 10th gen i9 so yeah it is worth to upgrade for me new pc amd is way expensive and not worth it don't care about power usage.
There doing this for there desktop GPUs but what about the mobile GPU ? No love
Fmf Just for RX 6000 DESTOP cards
I think yealry cpu releases needs to stop. Im tired of looking at -look at these new cpus being released- every 6 months...
Worse than 11th gen?
14th gen is 13th gen 'refresh' what did you expect? A new world?!???? 🤣LOL. 😉 It is just max refined and tuned up, 12/13th gen chip= the best it can be and this is normal. So you SHOULD buy it, if you have 12th or older gen and need performance. That's why also the pricing is the same as last year, even tho world economics has changed alot!
P.S. Get your cry's ready as 15th gen what will be on new platform, so new milking opportunity + with the world economics, that manufacturing and everything else just costs more, IT WILL BE priced much higher ( i expect at least +20% increase) If you can buy i7 '600k' 13 and 14th gen for ~450€ in stores now, then expect that 15th gen i7 will cost at least 550€! 😉And this will be across all the lineup.
"Refreshed"
Ai generator?
Raptorlake (14th gen) equals Rocketlake (11th gen) take 2
🤪😝😆
What's up with your voice? Are you an AI?
You just sounded like Nvidia marketing. Except in regard to AMD. We just got huge performance boost... with DLSS3... sorry AFMF... except they suck your precious things badly. Go watch Hardware Unboxed or something if you can't be bothered doing tests yourself?
lol lol lol the best cheaty videos of all time ! ! ! 🤣😂🤣
thanks, updatin me gpu rite now!