There is a documentary that interviews the jury long after the events. They say they said not guilty even though they thought he was. They also say it was in retaliation for the Rodney king trial. That being said, passive aggressiveness is seen as petty in our society, that family that lost their daughter is not being petty lady. Secondly, you wanna say for us clearly here, who was the aggressive one?
@@yourfinalhiringagency3890 That's a nice bunch of you have no idea how the legal system works all in one statement there. Thinking he likely did it isn't enough to charge him with it. They simply didn't have enough evidence to be certain he did. And passive aggressiveness isn't "seen" as petty, it flat out is. You're intentionally avoiding being honest with the person while pretending to be honest with them. You couldn't get any more petty.
@@kev1619" There's no way you can say ,"RIP he's wife's killer" OJ is not "At Rest ' ,he's burning and cursing in Hell now ,you know that . And no im not judging him ,that's what Good Lord has done . The Word of GOD states "By their fruits you shall them" and Simpson was an evil man and a killer . He's where he belongs in the Lake of Fire for eternity.
Yeah, he most definitely did, and one of the jurors even gave him a 'black power fist' after the not guilty verdict was read. The jury was split down racial lines... He did it.
There was one other that was from the Spartans, basically a king told them if they didn't surrender they were all die or something along those lines and the Spartans respond with "If"
That's awesome your favorite book cover is from a murderer that got to walk the streets his whole life while the family is still suffering today. Great person you must be
cheeky loophole? If you're referring to him putting out a demented diversion to the public, then you're right. Cleverly converting the book to confession is not loophole. Or cheeky.
If my daughter was unlive by her husband and we all freaking knew he did it and got away with it and then wrote a book about it, hiding "if" is the least I can freaking do.
An all black jury got a black guy off for murdering a couple of white people. Pretty sure everyone knew what the were doing and thinking two wrongs make a right somehow.
The acquittal was more "fuck the LAPD" than "I don't actually think he did it", the police basically took shortcuts to frame him for a crime he actually did
As someone in graphic design... It's nothing special nor is it difficult. The idea was to just hide the "If" you could make it really small, 1% opaque, Could use a glossy ink the same color as the background, could hide it with a messy background, could make it so far away from the rest of the sentence it looks like it's not connected.
Jfc y’all can’t even let someone give praise such a simple yet effective “fuck you” to oj…. I agree, it’s very subtle and well done and I’m also in the design field.
I think it’s still libel when u look at all the factors. They used the typography to suggest a confession of sorts AND they promoted the book as such. Anyways. The court ruled not guilty. Move on.
@@jimboSleeeeiiicestfu mate you sounds so dumb Being able to prove something in court and privilege are 2 different things They only say privilege when a white kid shoots and kill some black folks, there is clear evidence of it, but he gets away with it Or other examples of privilege This is not the case He was found not guilty after some time in prison, right ? He would have been on house arrest, waiting trial, and then found not guilty, if it was privilege 😂
@jimboSleeeeiiice because the justice system is still incredibly slanted in favor of white people and anyone pretending otherwise is a moron. He's just lucky he had a lot of money and the trial happened after the Rodney King incident
The court can enforce if they want to enforce it. You're still liable for attempting to do so, with have the clear intent to do so. That's not rare knowledge. But the system is broken, so childish shenanigans like this, all of sudden become great feats for some broken reason.
@@jennyjackson621 yeah you are exactly right but obviously you knew that already. The sad thing is people thinking this untouchable for liable and defending their position based on opinions and feelings as though they were a court of law.
If you owed a lot of money then yeah i find it reasonable to write such a book because a title like that would gain attention. The media does it all the time aswell, they say things that are utragous for attention, if they can do it why cant any other individual?
@@Hebelinahebel1 A: the book goes beyond just a quirky title it literally describes what if O.J simpson killed his wife. Its not some sensationalist hitpiece it delivers exactly as promised. "If i did it" and goes on to describe if O.J Simpson did it B: its really fucking sus to talk in detail about killing your wife if you didn't actually do it .... while its also a court case for the public to witness ..... and its specifically to pay money to his (former) wife's family. It goes to show that he really doesn't give a shit about his (former) wife like wtf kind of insult of a memory is this
Bullshit. Who on Earth would know that, if his lawyers did indeed tell him that? In addition, who told you that his hands swells if he doesn't take his medication? FAKE NEWS
Vsauce kinda strikes me as the kinda guy who’d steal an anatomy skeleton from a science lab and keep it in his passenger seat with sunglasses and a seatbelt on.
Even when a cover is true, that doesn't mean the book should be judged by solely it. We need to look further into a situation before agreeing with what a cover presents. Hence the saying "don't judge a book by its cover". Not to be a buzzkill lol I know the comment is lighthearted
You have to assume he gives a fk whether anyone (and everyone knows he did) actually thinks it's a confession because of double jeopardy laws, they can't touch him
@@minirop If he was going to publish a book called ‘If I Did It’, I honestly doubt he cares that people know he did and consequently the rebranding of the book. He has probably already justified the killings to himself, from what I’ve seen he revels in the public perception that he got away with murder.
It’s literally like Edgar Allan Poe’s short story The Tell-tale Heart, where the protagonist tries to explain why he’s not insane by explaining how carefully thought out and executed his murder was and how no insane person could have done it so carefully and perfectly
Common misconception psychopaths and serial killers are not insane they are fully aware of their actions and can therefore be punished. People with schizophrenia can be insane doing a psychosis. They do not know what they are doing, therefore they cannot be held liable. Or that is at least how it is where I am from. The expression being insane and being legally insane is two completely different things.
Its the truth. OJ got away with it because he was a beloved and succesful black man and his ex-wife was white. After tensions from 1992, and with majority of jury being black it was twisted retribution. Also Prosection messed up.and let defence drag them along into ridicule and excessively long trial.
@Nancy Davis didn't know your life was tragic enough that you have to start fights with completely random strangers on the internet and to make personal statements about someone with a fake name and a loaf of bread as their profile picture but here we are.
A bit more backstory on the original printing: OJ wrote the book, and his publishers began to get word out about its release. When the two families heard about the book deal, they sued for the rights and proceeds of the book. I'm fairly certain that's why OJ had the original copies destroyed.
I want OJ to write a book “ Fuck it , I did it “ or “ I really didn’t do it “ before he dies Edit : He passed away yesterday but left no book to clarify anything , I’m disappointed
You can't be tried for the same crime twice. I think legally he could juat say he did it and brag about it(wich he has on national television), but ya. I think he could literally sell small golf gloves with his signature and an I did it xoxo tag.
@@VivianWasntHere aww, I see, that's cool.. so it's not an anime thing! I've always wondered why anime people's eyes are so big and everybody looks like an oversized baby lol
he didn't do it. his son obviously did. but OJ wants to keep the heat on himself , he can't be tried again for the murder. his son however, can still be brought to trial. so what does oj do? convince America he did it. his son will never go to prison for them double murders
@@MarkLipka how does that make a difference? I'm not getting aggressive, I just got kicked out of English for beating a bully up that kept calling me Peter Pan because I looked like the actor and was in foster care...
The most fascinating part of that book is the part written by the ghost writer of the book about writing the book. Talking about the things OJ said during their time working together and later retracted. Colors the book in a whole new light by the time you get to the part that is supposed to be OJs perspective
Don't know the full story of what's written in the book or how the trial went, but I don't understand how that would be the most damning thing. Wouldn't all the details be discussed in court?
@@cutman15nah, court is very picky with evidence due to how we run crime and punishment laws here, the police and government have much less power in this regard, and the accused has the "innocent until proven guilty" clause, which no other country actually has as of yet. so, a simple mistake in policing or evidence preservation could kill the entire case, and essentially burn all the evidence. another issue with the case is that the jury had known members of extremist black power groups, that in their own word say that they would never give him a guilty plea, at best leading to a hung jury. there were also many hand symbols made by certain jury members, which also shows a severe bias in the trial. the whole case was horribly mishandled, with biased jury, shoddy evidence preservation, and massive public pressure threatening the jury members, with kk members threatening violence if he was declared innocent and extremist black power members if he was declared guilty, a through shitshow through and through.
@@sumtenwitty6021What? In what parallel universe do you live where the US is the only country treating people as innocent until proven guilty? The presumption of innocence is literally the most undisputed legal maxim there is. It is not only used in every democracy on this planet but even a human right according to the UN.
Who wouldn't just hire an assassin to take him out?? Hell if were that woman's father OJ would have never made it to the courtroom... He's basically admitted to it and is walking around today a free man, what kind of fucking justice is that?
@@no1weezerfan bullshit. I'm not religious, an eye for an eye may he wrong but the Bible also says to pick up a sword to protect yourself from evil/protect your flock. This evil these days get light sentences then go back out to commit the same crimes. Sending them straight I hell works for me!
I actually read If I Did It in a university class on memoir. My professor used it to demonstrate an unreliable narrator and used it together with other contemporary sources on the case and events leading up. He was a really awesome professor.
The best part about this story is that 9 years before OJ wrote the book, Chris Rock did a skit on his HBO show where he made a joke about OJ writing this exact book and titles it "I didn't kill my wife, but if I did this is how I'd do it" 😂😂
@@cheekmeatI bet he does! But, he should not get royalties from that book, or anything else involving his committing a crime! The civil suit was supposed to impose punitive retribution on him. In other words, paying that fine is _meant to be_ a hardship on him, and he is supposed to have trouble paying it back!
I'm still subscribed to the idea that OJ didn't do it, but his son did, and OJ covered for him as much as possible, even using the book idea to continue to misdirect attention.
It’s hard to deny that you did it when you’re able to correct details that nobody would know about but the actual killer. The actual writer of the book said he was terrified when working with OJ when he would say things like “that’s not what I did!”
"Simpson's former manager, Norman Pardo, claimed that Simpson was not involved in writing the book, but rather accepted, against Pardo's advice, $600,000 from ReganBooks and News Corporation to say he had written it and to conduct an interview."
@@MickeyMouse-lm6zj What's this gotta do with black people? It's because he's black too, people tend to sympathise more with their own race but not me I hate all of humanity equally
@@Killerkracken21they might not be allowed to say it but literally everyone alive rn that knows that mfers name knows he did it so they dont have to put his name on it for it to hurt him
Criminally, he would have had to have been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which he wasn't. For civil court, he just has to be more likely guilty than not, which he was, and so he was financially liable. It just goes to show that even though he wasn't found not guilty in criminal court, what that really says is that the jury weren't completely convinced of his guilt, not that he was proven not guilty. Some of the arguments the jury were given were totally misleading as well. For example, one "fact" the jury were told (in response to the prosecution telling the jury that OJ's wife was a victim of domestic violence) is that only a tiny, tiny fraction of women who are victims of domestic violence are murdered by their husbands or ex-husbands, which seemed to deflect guilt away from OJ. In fact, however, if you look at women who are victims of domestic violence who have been murdered, 90% of those murders are committed by a partner or ex partner. So the fact that she was a victim of domestic violence and was definitely murdered actually should have pointed MORE fingers at OJ, but because the prosection didn't understand this fact/misdirection by the defense, it was never correct for the jury.
@@Denozo88 Yup, in the book Fahrenheit 451, when the destruction of all books was taken to an extreme, many books still slid through the cracks. Even if they weren’t in their paper form.
Well, the victim’s families get the proceeds so it’s fine. But also, I wanna say it was the 15th or 20th “anniversary” of the murders, people were buying the book too. I know cause i shipped a bunch out at work. I have the audiobook too from audible (it was free with my membership along with some other true crime books) so I got it.
How is that ironic? Lol, I'm sure because he died it reminded people of him, because let's face it. No one thought of him again until he did that thing in the hotel. So they were probably googling him, and reading different stories. I'm sure most of them mentioned the book. So people went and bought it. Doesn't take a genius.
All I saw in my recommended shorts was Michael holding up a bloody "I did it" sign and... like, I didn't even question it. I just assumed he'd finally snapped.
@@davidbrockmeier9538 Hey , how's your heart btw? Fully up to date with immunization i hope? BTW: We all know that nigerians commit violence at rates vastly exceeding civilized folk. Asian males commit violence at 1/1000th the rate of a nigerian male in USA. Maybe you should go hang out with them more? That would be good.
@@CaliMisfit1921 Yes they will. Simpson with his arrogance was the only thing keeping the Goldman's from receiving money. His kids' mom was killed by him too, and I doubt they have any problem at all making sure they get money once the will is paid out. So fail
I wanted to read this book recently. I remember the big fuss it got when I was younger. I didn't want to give OJ my money so I started looking all this up and it's true, Nicole's family gets all the money for these books. They completely own the rights.
@@christopherwellman2364 it's one of the original teenage mutant ninja turtles from back in the 90s with the natural wear and tear and it makes it look creep as hell where the plastic has worn off.
Yep, but unfortunately the verdict was the correct one. It is a basic principle that it is better for a guilty person to go free, than for an innocent person to go to jail. So yeah, he did and everyone knows it. They just couldn't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
@@velocibadgery They could and if it wasn’t for a few mishaps, he would’ve been. The defense simply shone the spotlight away from OJ every time rather than actually defend him because there was nothing to defend but a cold blooded murderer.
@@thatrandomdude9974 That's not what reasonable doubt means. By that standard, no one anywhere ever should be found guilty of anything. There's always an at least 0.00000...0001% chance someone is innocent.
I saw a documentary from a well known PI who worked on the the case and i am completely convinced it was OJ's son and OJ was covering up for him. Police did a shitty ass job on this case.
It was the family of the victims who made it possible. They had fair share since he was using the victims stories in a book he was writing. One of those weird laws that apply to authors 😂
@@SubUrbanSF I think you’re confused this person never said he was innocent they said the opposite idk why you got an attitude because you were confused? They were saying that basically just because they didn’t find him guilty doesn’t mean he was innocent, it’s a saying
@@SubUrbanSF Criminal Law has a higher standard of proof. Civil Law is more loose and only needs to prove 51% likely he murdered them. So you can be criminally innocent but civilly guilty and liable
Or book 2: Oops I did it again 3: I played with your heart Sorry not to be disrespectful to the victim’s family, just the title immediately reminded me that lol
Well according to the 5th amendment of the US Constitution, even if evidence that proved 100% that OJ’s the the killer, or even if OJ blatantly stated that he killed his wife, he’d have no fear of going to prison because the 5th amendment protects people from Double Jeopardy.
If you followed the story and got to know the type of man OJ is you would know he wasn’t doing it to raise money out of the kindness of his heart. Narcissistic people love to brag about getting away with hurting people. His book was the most hurtful way he could have raised the money, that’s why he wrote it instead of a book about being accused. This clap back from the family is awesome.
I mean he still got away with it, and he probably gets some type of sick pleasure and enjoyment over the fact that he can blatantly make a book about it and still not get in trouble
Interesting fact: Many of the jurors were on an investigative news show (I forget which one it was) after the original verdict had been handed down and they were shown pieces of evidence that they were not allowed to see during the trial. Withholding evidence happens all the time in court cases as both sides negotiate with the judge. Anyway, MOST of the jurors that saw this previously unseen evidence said that *they would have voted "guilty".*
@@1stAmendmentorDie1776I'm sure there is a reason, but the fact that these jurors said they would have voted him guilty if they had seen it is a bit troubling. Backroom deals between the prosecution and defense happens all the time and it's understandable why it happens most of the time because otherwise you'd have trials that go on forever because of magnitude of evidence, relevant or not. I wish I could remember what pieces of evidence were presented to them.
@@JustWasted3HoursHere I can show any juror anything that can change their mind. Doesn't mean it should be allowed in court. That's why we have the entire process.
At the time, this case was labeled as black vs white, but I would describe it as women vs male sports fans. The guys in my dorm thought he was innocent because he was too good of a football player. Some added that OJ couldn't have done it because he had a good sense of humor. The guys who stood up for him the most were all white. Me and all of the girls I knew (including my black friends) said he was guilty. Some of us had been in abusive relationships and saw the signs and the others just stood by the evidence. The guys down the hall (white sports fans) refused to consider any evidence and thought he was framed to defame his image.
I am, and he did. I remember where I was and who I was with when the verdict was broadcast. My mom said she was glad because she'd rather see a guilty man go free, than an innocent man get locked up. I disagree. That man should have been locked away, the jury screwed up.
There is literally an SNL sketch where O.J. is back in court over another crime and the judge literally had to ask aliens and people in 30 year coma recoveries to be the jury.
Yeah I thought so too, but it makes sense for the RUclips Shorts/TikTok format. Both platforms reward storytelling and Michael has always been into sharing crazy stories.
@lucky_lol I don't think it's non Americans, I think it's younger people. I'm not American but my parents were very much stuck to the OJ trial on TV at the time. I only learned about it from the American Crime Story show though
The little "if" is the most passive aggressive thing I've seen
1.2k likes after 3 months and no replies? lemme fix that
Well, their last name IS Goldman.
Indeed!!
There is a documentary that interviews the jury long after the events. They say they said not guilty even though they thought he was. They also say it was in retaliation for the Rodney king trial. That being said, passive aggressiveness is seen as petty in our society, that family that lost their daughter is not being petty lady. Secondly, you wanna say for us clearly here, who was the aggressive one?
@@yourfinalhiringagency3890 That's a nice bunch of you have no idea how the legal system works all in one statement there.
Thinking he likely did it isn't enough to charge him with it. They simply didn't have enough evidence to be certain he did.
And passive aggressiveness isn't "seen" as petty, it flat out is. You're intentionally avoiding being honest with the person while pretending to be honest with them. You couldn't get any more petty.
The tiny “if” feels like something out of a SpongeBob episode 😂
💯💯
Literally how Mr. Krabs wrote "money back guarantee" on the menu sign.
it really dooeeesss
Are you referring to the episode 6B of the first season of the popular children's cartoon known as "Spongebob Squarepants"!
THE SIDE 💀
IT'S SO FADED 😭 I CAN'T EVEN TELL IF IM LOOKING AT IT 😭😭
that's the slickest move a book cover designer could've made damn
@@FlyingRep The intent was to get their money. So what?
@@FlyingRep implicate a murderer in the murder he did*
Graphic designers in the klan be like
@@FlyingRep what, you don't believe he did it?
It's like the arcade Jaws game
Man OJ was really a sick man. I can't believe the audacity
I'm in shock . The nerve, the audacity
rip his wifes killer that guy passed away a while ago
yet ignore the racist cop that planted evidence
@@kev1619" There's no way you can say ,"RIP he's wife's killer" OJ is not "At Rest ' ,he's burning and cursing in Hell now ,you know that . And no im not judging him ,that's what Good Lord has done . The Word of GOD states "By their fruits you shall them" and Simpson was an evil man and a killer . He's where he belongs in the Lake of Fire for eternity.
Yes he was sick from cancer may he r.i.p. A true hero, and great athlete.
The book describes his emotions and thoughts so well that either he is an amazing award winning writer, or he actual did the crime.
he had ghostwriters i believe
Not a lot of multiple concussion patient authors around
@@Qwerty0791 huh? Nah there's tons. A lot of great authors had rough lives with tons of injuries, including concussions. It's almost more likely
he is completely innocent wdym
now hear me out, what if he didn't do it
The man really pulled "I didn't kill her... Or did I?"
I feel like on his deathbed he’s going to say some shit like I did it😂😂 but truly crazy how he got away?
Yeah, he most definitely did, and one of the jurors even gave him a 'black power fist' after the not guilty verdict was read. The jury was split down racial lines... He did it.
Did I?… did I, did I did did I dooooo 😎🐐
He's an absolute scum bag murderer but he got a pass because he's black.
DUN DUN DUNNNNN
The designer for the cover must wake up with a big satisfied grin every morning
i know i would
It's a generic cover
@@GojosBackHand it is a generic cover but it’s how they designed the lettering.
Crazy how white men always find a way to oppress innocent black men SMH. Yall are sheep of this oppressive system
@@GojosBackHand always that one kid
I remember being specifically told not to put red on black because it's hard to read. very slick.
Strongest ‘If’ ever
>% > =÷])>÷# /&>@ :[??÷,/
if I REPLIED THIS COMMENT.
There was one other that was from the Spartans, basically a king told them if they didn't surrender they were all die or something along those lines and the Spartans respond with "If"
@@chadthompson3003IF they surrendered, or IF he could kill them?
@@chloepainter4064 ye, history has bunch of odd things like that
Or alternatively, the most loose hypothetical ever
That's one of my favorite book covers of all time. "If" in size 1 font and "I did it" in size 48.
Fr you already know the marketing agent got a nice promotion after that banger.
And on the spine the “if” is the same size font but it’s in fucking WHITE! As a graphic designer myself, I LOVE this cover 😆
OJ is probably have the best version of marrying a white woman i mean look at Jonathan Majors dude lost everything
@@saorise28I never noticed that detail on that side of the book, that’s fucking genius of the cover designer plus the front
That's awesome your favorite book cover is from a murderer that got to walk the streets his whole life while the family is still suffering today. Great person you must be
That’s gotta be one of the cheekiest loopholes I have ever seen.
Best trolling ever
cheeky loophole? If you're referring to him putting out a demented diversion to the public, then you're right. Cleverly converting the book to confession is not loophole. Or cheeky.
He didn’t do it though, it most likely was his son
If my daughter was unlive by her husband and we all freaking knew he did it and got away with it and then wrote a book about it, hiding "if" is the least I can freaking do.
But he didn't do it so your story makes no sense @@alexlilano1931
I wonder if those jury members ever feel fucking stupid nowadays
An all black jury got a black guy off for murdering a couple of white people. Pretty sure everyone knew what the were doing and thinking two wrongs make a right somehow.
No. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing and why he wasn't convicted.
The acquittal was more "fuck the LAPD" than "I don't actually think he did it", the police basically took shortcuts to frame him for a crime he actually did
@@spoilers9723 that pisses me off so much.
It was ojs kid that did it. Oj took the blame and differed attention from his son.
Typography matters. Mad props to the graphic designer
Well he just had to make a inconspicuous’IF’ so..
@@redfo3009 even when you make something inconspicious its not easy plus the book designer did the hard work so he still deserves mad props
As someone in graphic design... It's nothing special nor is it difficult. The idea was to just hide the "If" you could make it really small, 1% opaque, Could use a glossy ink the same color as the background, could hide it with a messy background, could make it so far away from the rest of the sentence it looks like it's not connected.
Jfc y’all can’t even let someone give praise such a simple yet effective “fuck you” to oj…. I agree, it’s very subtle and well done and I’m also in the design field.
I think it’s still libel when u look at all the factors. They used the typography to suggest a confession of sorts AND they promoted the book as such. Anyways. The court ruled not guilty. Move on.
"IF I did it, this is how I did it. Or did I?"
This book is called I Did It. Or is it?
🤣🤣
Hey, VSauce, Michael h--
...wait
But how much IF weights?
Dammit you beat me to it
"I didn't kill them, but here's details from the murder that only the killer would know"
69 likes🎉
@@jimboSleeeeiiicestfu mate you sounds so dumb
Being able to prove something in court and privilege are 2 different things
They only say privilege when a white kid shoots and kill some black folks, there is clear evidence of it, but he gets away with it
Or other examples of privilege
This is not the case
He was found not guilty after some time in prison, right ?
He would have been on house arrest, waiting trial, and then found not guilty, if it was privilege 😂
It was written after the trial lmao. We all know he did it but let's not spread fake news
@jimboSleeeeiiice because the justice system is still incredibly slanted in favor of white people and anyone pretending otherwise is a moron. He's just lucky he had a lot of money and the trial happened after the Rodney King incident
@@basedjiren3889 there are details in the book about the murder that weren’t released into the public.
We all sat through yonks of this guy professing his innocence, all the while knowing that he was as guilty as sin. Feel so sad for Nicole’s family
If only more people understood that 'not guilty' and 'innocent' _aren't the same thing._
The way they changed the cover while still technically not changing the title is absolutely amazing. Props to whoever thought of that.
The court can enforce if they want to enforce it. You're still liable for attempting to do so, with have the clear intent to do so. That's not rare knowledge. But the system is broken, so childish shenanigans like this, all of sudden become great feats for some broken reason.
@@jennyjackson621 Childish stuff like this...? So I take it you're one of those weird O.J. apologists.
@@jennyjackson621 well I think he was technically proven guilty in civil court so
plagiarism
@@jennyjackson621 yeah you are exactly right but obviously you knew that already. The sad thing is people thinking this untouchable for liable and defending their position based on opinions and feelings as though they were a court of law.
Imagine "not" killing your wife and then writing a book about how you would kill her if you did.
If you owed a lot of money then yeah i find it reasonable to write such a book because a title like that would gain attention. The media does it all the time aswell, they say things that are utragous for attention, if they can do it why cant any other individual?
@@Hebelinahebel1 the book is literally how and why he would murder his wife
@@Hebelinahebel1 A: the book goes beyond just a quirky title it literally describes what if O.J simpson killed his wife. Its not some sensationalist hitpiece it delivers exactly as promised. "If i did it" and goes on to describe if O.J Simpson did it
B: its really fucking sus to talk in detail about killing your wife if you didn't actually do it .... while its also a court case for the public to witness ..... and its specifically to pay money to his (former) wife's family. It goes to show that he really doesn't give a shit about his (former) wife like wtf kind of insult of a memory is this
@@TriNguyen-he7xk Yeah i agree its very sus and its that exact reason why it got the attention and generated money which was the end goal.
@@Hebelinahebel1 Hey the media does it all the time. Smartest people in the world, commentor and those who liked the comment.
They should title his obituary “If O.J. Simpson Passed Away”.
So…..uh……who wants to…..do it?💀
@@anahitamunagekar5423 horrible timing 💀
I think we all came back to this video for the same reason 💀
Ikr. I won't believe it till I see him in a casket...he'll do anything for attention!
@@dontbeasucka.61His prostate cancer had been known since February 2024
Even the original “If I Did It” had “I DID IT” in a different color and everything!
Cancer: “If I did it”
Naah this comment is too underrated
Naw this comment is wild 😭
That's crazy 💀💀💀
😭😭😭
I don't get it can someone explain, I feel dumb. Is this a reference to the disease or to the horoscope? lol
Imagine if they put the "IF" in braille 😭
⠼⠊⠋ I did it
LOL
Or in Spanish lol
' Si, I did it' can mean ' Yes, I did it' or ' If, I did it '
@@sharonrigs7999 si only means yes with an accent on the i
@@BeesAR All the more ambiguous
Never judge a book by its gloves
Whenever I feel bad about myself I remember that I'm not O J Simpson.
Books have gloves, now? Dumb joke.
Bruh what does that even mean
The glove that killed his wife didn’t fit Oj’s hand and that’s one of the main reasons why he was found not guilty…hence the joke.
If the cover doesn’t fit you must acquit
He did do it. He was instructed by his lawyers not to take his medications when he was to put on the murder gloves. So his hands swelled up.
This is correct.
I also heard that the glove may have been frozen while it was in police custody as evidence, which would have shrunken it.
Fun fact, he actually wore the gloves to a sports interview he did a few years prior. The 'ugly-ass shoes' too.
They were also leather gloves, and fancy leather often shrinks upon getting wet. Which, well, this glove did.
Bullshit.
Who on Earth would know that, if his lawyers did indeed tell him that?
In addition, who told you that his hands swells if he doesn't take his medication?
FAKE NEWS
Vsauce kinda strikes me as the kinda guy who’d steal an anatomy skeleton from a science lab and keep it in his passenger seat with sunglasses and a seatbelt on.
I love how the best RUclips comments are always unrelated to the video. Also, you're right haha
That'd be a great skit
lol my mom did that when i was younger, she's one of the most funny and whimsical people you'll meet
Omg, I know someone who does it. She’s hot but she is a strange bird
True tbh
and they said never to judge a book by its cover
Well you have to read the fine print! Of course the murdering puke did it!
@Juan Gomez normally I hate it when poeple say this but you’re 100% right in this case
I don't think this is what they had in mind. 😅
Even when a cover is true, that doesn't mean the book should be judged by solely it. We need to look further into a situation before agreeing with what a cover presents. Hence the saying "don't judge a book by its cover".
Not to be a buzzkill lol I know the comment is lighthearted
I can't see the the if on the side of the book
Sources say publishers are hoping for OJ’s second marriage so they can publish the sequel “Oops I did it again”
I'm sorry it'd be "OOPS, if I did it again"
It would be his third marriage, I believe
@@con9tessa
Oh yes "fuck, I can't stop doing it god help me"
A trilogy.
I played with his heart.
thats britney spears not oj
i love this every time i hear it like every time he sees this book he has to see "i did it"on the book he wrote about his crime
You have to assume he gives a fk whether anyone (and everyone knows he did) actually thinks it's a confession because of double jeopardy laws, they can't touch him
@@Floydian4everr Also, he's dead.
Holy Jesus that cover change was genius
I wondering how it was not challenged. Like companies making big claims with an asterisk whose text is in size 1pt on the dark side of the Moon.
@@minirop likely because the actual title for sale still said "If I Did It" rather than "I Did It".
@@minirop I don’t think he’s in much of a position to challenge it and probably wants to stay away from run ins with the legal system
@@minirop If he was going to publish a book called ‘If I Did It’, I honestly doubt he cares that people know he did and consequently the rebranding of the book. He has probably already justified the killings to himself, from what I’ve seen he revels in the public perception that he got away with murder.
@@Jomchenif he did it
That cover change is the smartest and most badass way to spite someone
Dam your a very silly person, companies have been doing this for decades it's called small print 🤯
Yeah, they’re even now.
@@Dude0000 😂
@@Dude0000 Nah, not quite. OJ still murdered their son. One more sick burn and they'll be even, though.
It is PhD-level petty and I am here for it.
The book is seriously so eye opening, too. It has details that only the killer would know, a motive, how it was done, etc. It’s a confession.
What's the motive
@@itsROMPERS...jealousy
But he's still innocent
@@flatbkush6 Legally, but we all know
@@itsROMPERS... He thought his wife was cheating on him with the guy
"Riddle Me This, Batman."
What's 13% and also half?
SEEEEXXXXX
It’s literally like Edgar Allan Poe’s short story The Tell-tale Heart, where the protagonist tries to explain why he’s not insane by explaining how carefully thought out and executed his murder was and how no insane person could have done it so carefully and perfectly
It’s easy to convince the world you’re insane, the challenging thing to do is convince them you’re sane again 😂
111th/*114thliker
Common misconception psychopaths and serial killers are not insane they are fully aware of their actions and can therefore be punished. People with schizophrenia can be insane doing a psychosis. They do not know what they are doing, therefore they cannot be held liable. Or that is at least how it is where I am from. The expression being insane and being legally insane is two completely different things.
I can easily imagine Robert Downey blackfacing once more for a leap-of-faith trial to steal an oscar from a well known POC colleague in 2024
@@victorvg666 do a psychosis
That's the slickest legal shade throwing book cover ever lmao
hey
Its the truth. OJ got away with it because he was a beloved and succesful black man and his ex-wife was white. After tensions from 1992, and with majority of jury being black it was twisted retribution. Also Prosection messed up.and let defence drag them along into ridicule and excessively long trial.
Yeah
@@EnergeticSpark63I feel like I've seen your comments before 🗿
This designer is an absolute badass
@Nancy Davis why you mad my dude
@Nancy Davis didn't know your life was tragic enough that you have to start fights with completely random strangers on the internet and to make personal statements about someone with a fake name and a loaf of bread as their profile picture but here we are.
@@SomeGuyHowGoesIt Plot twist, It's OJ's Smurf account
@@asymmetricfuzion970 lol dude really said malicious slitherer no self awareness
Crazy how white men always find a way to oppress innocent black men SMH. Yall are sheep of this oppressive system
He did it. Never have I thought otherwise.
A bit more backstory on the original printing: OJ wrote the book, and his publishers began to get word out about its release. When the two families heard about the book deal, they sued for the rights and proceeds of the book. I'm fairly certain that's why OJ had the original copies destroyed.
That's what I recall too.
We live in a ridiculous world lol wtf
I want OJ to write a book “ Fuck it , I did it “ or “ I really didn’t do it “ before he dies
Edit : He passed away yesterday but left no book to clarify anything , I’m disappointed
Well, it would have to be the former
He should write both books just to piss off everyone one last time
And publish the book when he is on his death bed
Just call it “sike!”
You can't be tried for the same crime twice. I think legally he could juat say he did it and brag about it(wich he has on national television), but ya. I think he could literally sell small golf gloves with his signature and an I did it xoxo tag.
We don’t even know if he died of cancer because his cancers cells actually just made a book called “If I Was Malignant”
😂🎉
why are your eyes so big and your neck so thin
@@petritdauti It’s an art style based on the Scott Pilgrim books; Of course it’s not meant to be realistic.
@@VivianWasntHere aww, I see, that's cool.. so it's not an anime thing! I've always wondered why anime people's eyes are so big and everybody looks like an oversized baby lol
Maybe it was the cancer cells' sons.
"Thank you, your honor, I won't do it again."
I think Mr Fox said it the best. “OJ did it. Cuz, if he didn’t, he’d be looking for the killer”
Exactly. That's always been the biggest sign of his guilt. He was fixated on acquiting himself never on finding the supposed killer.
So those that didn't find the killers of their partners are the killers?
@@J4k7193R Read it again very slowly.
@@melanierose4140 take your time and comprehend
@@J4k7193R wat mate?
Whoever designed that book cover is amazing. It’s simple but impactful. Read between the lines and well- it’s a confession.
he didn't do it. his son obviously did. but OJ wants to keep the heat on himself , he can't be tried again for the murder. his son however, can still be brought to trial. so what does oj do? convince America he did it. his son will never go to prison for them double murders
*Whomever
[Submitted with all due respect because WORDS MATTER] cheers 😊
@@MarkLipka word!
@@MarkLipka how does that make a difference? I'm not getting aggressive, I just got kicked out of English for beating a bully up that kept calling me Peter Pan because I looked like the actor and was in foster care...
Not that hard: the title of the book is "If I had Killed my Wife,this is how I Would have done it"
The most fascinating part of that book is the part written by the ghost writer of the book about writing the book. Talking about the things OJ said during their time working together and later retracted. Colors the book in a whole new light by the time you get to the part that is supposed to be OJs perspective
Tldr?
@@Fahizzo it's 3 sentences
@@orangenostril he has tiktok brain
@@orangenostril I’m not talking about these 3 sentences you layer 1 thinker
Tldr part of the book is by a ghost writer that gives insightful thought
Just... Just read the comment.
That tiny "if" is the best cover troll I've ever seen!
Most damning thing was, his "hypothetical" revealed details that the police never made public.
Yeah, cause he got away with murder and now brags about it..
Don't know the full story of what's written in the book or how the trial went, but I don't understand how that would be the most damning thing. Wouldn't all the details be discussed in court?
@@cutman15nah, court is very picky with evidence due to how we run crime and punishment laws here, the police and government have much less power in this regard, and the accused has the "innocent until proven guilty" clause, which no other country actually has as of yet.
so, a simple mistake in policing or evidence preservation could kill the entire case, and essentially burn all the evidence.
another issue with the case is that the jury had known members of extremist black power groups, that in their own word say that they would never give him a guilty plea, at best leading to a hung jury.
there were also many hand symbols made by certain jury members, which also shows a severe bias in the trial.
the whole case was horribly mishandled, with biased jury, shoddy evidence preservation, and massive public pressure threatening the jury members, with kk members threatening violence if he was declared innocent and extremist black power members if he was declared guilty, a through shitshow through and through.
@@sumtenwitty6021What? In what parallel universe do you live where the US is the only country treating people as innocent until proven guilty? The presumption of innocence is literally the most undisputed legal maxim there is. It is not only used in every democracy on this planet but even a human right according to the UN.
@@anonymousanon4822maybe he meant they don’t have it written down. It may be an unwritten rule. IDK
Damn that’s actually a fuckin chess move on their part. Respect
Who wouldn't just hire an assassin to take him out?? Hell if were that woman's father OJ would have never made it to the courtroom... He's basically admitted to it and is walking around today a free man, what kind of fucking justice is that?
@@BrassBashers it's innocent until proven guilty not guilty until some idiots get a brain transplant and realise its innocent until proven guilty
LANGUAGE
It's not a chess move it's at best checkers because the subtitle is still a libelous claim.
@@no1weezerfan bullshit. I'm not religious, an eye for an eye may he wrong but the Bible also says to pick up a sword to protect yourself from evil/protect your flock. This evil these days get light sentences then go back out to commit the same crimes. Sending them straight I hell works for me!
the fact HE WROTE A BOOK about that shit is evil.
He is nothing less than evil. He murdered the mother of his children in cold blood and when you think it doesn’t get any worse he does this.
😂
Have you never read Mein Kampf?
Not really. He owed lots of money and what does everyone do these days to make money? Generate controversy.
@@doctorgrubious7725 they said the fact he wrote the book is evil. He didn’t say it’s the most evil book of all time… not very relevant.
I love that the "if" is red, which is very difficult to separate from black backgrounds while reading. The designer knew what they were doing.
Im pretty sure it still counts as lible if you intentionally make it misleading to assume one thing.
no shit
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo it's not lible
Well, the publisher goldmans are jewish
red is clear on black. its moreso because it's so tiny
That book is WILD. I read OJ's version in 2006. He's honestly equally as narcissistic, as he is guilty...... Which is 100% on both fronts.
How did you get that version of the book?
@@danieldavis8607it’s online and his version of the book doesn’t make sense. The Goldmans rewrote the “confession” to fit with the evidence
Was it actually a good book though? Like, worth reading?
@@RexTenomousprobably not, sounds really annoying
He didnt do it, his son did it.
holy shit, the if on the spine of the book was so faint i literally had to look 3 times to see it 😭amazing work by the cover designer
I can’t find it lol where is it
@@lillyschwab1250 if you look really closely, you can sort of make out the very very faint large "IF" in front of the "I DID IT"
dude i just found it that shit took an invisibility potion
Oh man I never would have found it without this comment. It’s so faint lol.
I had to put my phone in shadow lmao
I can’t believe there are people out there that actually believe he didn’t murder those 2 people.
I actually read If I Did It in a university class on memoir. My professor used it to demonstrate an unreliable narrator and used it together with other contemporary sources on the case and events leading up. He was a really awesome professor.
Oj aj oj hak cipta
Tapi aku tidak ada lagi kesempatan datang dan langsung pergi untuk selamanya tidak akan datang dari luar kota dan
Idk what Cumberland is on but he may have had a stroke someone should check on him
@@AverageLlama_Guy 777 ұ
@@AverageLlama_Guybro is genuinely tweaking
The best part about this story is that 9 years before OJ wrote the book, Chris Rock did a skit on his HBO show where he made a joke about OJ writing this exact book and titles it "I didn't kill my wife, but if I did this is how I'd do it" 😂😂
He needs his royalty 😂
OJ then walked up to Chris and bitched slapped him.
@@vladakeep my books name out your FKN MOUTH
@@cheekmeatI bet he does!
But, he should not get royalties from that book, or anything else involving his committing a crime!
The civil suit was supposed to impose punitive retribution on him.
In other words, paying that fine is _meant to be_ a hardship on him, and he is supposed to have trouble paying it back!
@@TheNoiseySpectator i was talking about chris rock needing royalties for coining the title and theme of the book...
Later he came out with a book called “I would have did it” then after that book “now I wanna do it”
Next he's gonna be like: here's a step by step on how YOU can do it too!
Then "mama, ive done it"
@@queenieqt2033mama, just killed a man
@@plutolunaplays mmm yasss queen
@@plutolunaplaysPut a gun against his head, pulled my trigger now he’s dead
I'm still subscribed to the idea that OJ didn't do it, but his son did, and OJ covered for him as much as possible, even using the book idea to continue to misdirect attention.
I really was expecting “the public was revolted so all 400,000 copies sold out immediately” 😅
There is no accounting for taste!
I'm pretty sure they were? I remember that on bookshelves for a while
OnlyF in a nutshell
I heard the coffin didn't fit, so they was gonna let him live.
Hahhahaha that’s funny.
yo this is great haha
total underrated comment
If he's taller than a pole
Don't drop him in the hole.
😂😂😂
nah bro's def in the back of a white Ford Bronco trying to get into heaven
It’s hard to deny that you did it when you’re able to correct details that nobody would know about but the actual killer. The actual writer of the book said he was terrified when working with OJ when he would say things like “that’s not what I did!”
“That’s not what I did!….. if I did it!”
"Simpson's former manager, Norman Pardo, claimed that Simpson was not involved in writing the book, but rather accepted, against Pardo's advice, $600,000 from ReganBooks and News Corporation to say he had written it and to conduct an interview."
black people believed he was innocent
and why
@@MickeyMouse-lm6zjno they didn't, the jury was just full of idiots, like every jury
@@MickeyMouse-lm6zj What's this gotta do with black people? It's because he's black too, people tend to sympathise more with their own race but not me I hate all of humanity equally
rest in piece to a great man
Rip oj
I was low-key expecting "I did it... _or did I?_ " 😂😂
He didnt do it
@@kool_aid_ham_man2200 Are you serious?
@@pedrobrito4461what type of chemicals did you sniff
@@kool_aid_ham_man2200 Hi Patrick
"confessions of THE killer" is wild
cⁿᵒᵗonfessions of the killer
Due to likes laws n stuff they can’t actually put OJs name on there
@@Killerkracken21they might not be allowed to say it but literally everyone alive rn that knows that mfers name knows he did it so they dont have to put his name on it for it to hurt him
@@surr3ald3sign yup im reading it rn
He was fo un me liable in civil court after the family sued so according to the law, he did it. No need for an "allegedly."
An innocent person wouldn't even write a hypothetical like this. He knows he got away with it and tried to cash in on it.
No people have done this before plus what your saying is a crime
I would write a hypothetical book even if I didn't do it if I felt I wanted to.
@@oscarleijontoft no that's liable
Go to AO3. Trust me. People have written worse
Well he was in debt millions with this being the only way out. But yea crazy times
Criminally, he would have had to have been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which he wasn't. For civil court, he just has to be more likely guilty than not, which he was, and so he was financially liable. It just goes to show that even though he wasn't found not guilty in criminal court, what that really says is that the jury weren't completely convinced of his guilt, not that he was proven not guilty.
Some of the arguments the jury were given were totally misleading as well. For example, one "fact" the jury were told (in response to the prosecution telling the jury that OJ's wife was a victim of domestic violence) is that only a tiny, tiny fraction of women who are victims of domestic violence are murdered by their husbands or ex-husbands, which seemed to deflect guilt away from OJ. In fact, however, if you look at women who are victims of domestic violence who have been murdered, 90% of those murders are committed by a partner or ex partner. So the fact that she was a victim of domestic violence and was definitely murdered actually should have pointed MORE fingers at OJ, but because the prosection didn't understand this fact/misdirection by the defense, it was never correct for the jury.
One of the jurors gave the black power salute during the verdict.
He was found 'not guilty', but he sure as hell wasn't _innocent._
The second I heard him say “All copies were burned” I looked up how much it was auctioning for… $500-$2000, Jesus
All known copies. Their will always be copies that evade a destruction order.
@@Denozo88 Yup, in the book Fahrenheit 451, when the destruction of all books was taken to an extreme, many books still slid through the cracks. Even if they weren’t in their paper form.
I Found one auctioned for $25 lol
@@cheruphin5507 Sell if to me. I will pay 26$
@@thanosnoctem4473 sell it to me, I will pay $27
Ironic how a day after his death it went to number 1 on amazon
I got the audio why not
Well, the victim’s families get the proceeds so it’s fine. But also, I wanna say it was the 15th or 20th “anniversary” of the murders, people were buying the book too. I know cause i shipped a bunch out at work. I have the audiobook too from audible (it was free with my membership along with some other true crime books) so I got it.
How is that ironic? Lol, I'm sure because he died it reminded people of him, because let's face it. No one thought of him again until he did that thing in the hotel. So they were probably googling him, and reading different stories. I'm sure most of them mentioned the book. So people went and bought it. Doesn't take a genius.
@@kourtneymelton1282exactly lol these idiots don’t even know what the word ironic means 😂
@@budfeedUKwhat's ironic is your profile picture and name mate
All I saw in my recommended shorts was Michael holding up a bloody "I did it" sign and... like, I didn't even question it. I just assumed he'd finally snapped.
burn the coal pay the toll.
@@TheBelrickHey numbskull, are you implying that white dudes don't kill their spouses / families?
@@davidbrockmeier9538 Hey , how's your heart btw? Fully up to date with immunization i hope?
BTW: We all know that nigerians commit violence at rates vastly exceeding civilized folk. Asian males commit violence at 1/1000th the rate of a nigerian male in USA.
Maybe you should go hang out with them more? That would be good.
Lol one day
If click bait was a book
Now it’s “when I did it”.
Why I did it
they find a 2nd book in his house.."how i did it"
Where I did it
Who I did it (with)
(How) I Did It
They can probably change the title to "I Did It" now. O.J. Simpson can't sue them because he's dead.
His family sure as hell could
@@Ephlesssthey could but they wouldn’t
Those people aren't getting a dime🤭
well, he was found liable civilly so even back then it would not be libel, since a jury said he did it.
@@CaliMisfit1921 Yes they will. Simpson with his arrogance was the only thing keeping the Goldman's from receiving money. His kids' mom was killed by him too, and I doubt they have any problem at all making sure they get money once the will is paid out. So fail
I wanted to read this book recently. I remember the big fuss it got when I was younger. I didn't want to give OJ my money so I started looking all this up and it's true, Nicole's family gets all the money for these books. They completely own the rights.
What's the deal with your pfp?
@@christopherwellman2364 it's one of the original teenage mutant ninja turtles from back in the 90s with the natural wear and tear and it makes it look creep as hell where the plastic has worn off.
@@GrabEmByThePlushie Nice.
@@GrabEmByThePlushie Teenage Mutant Ninja Taxidermy 😂
He didn't do it, this guy did it ruclips.net/video/Tc-7aBuq-sU/видео.html
the cover's "if" is reasonable as a marketing tool, but the "if" on the spine is just diabolical
“It’s official: Murder is legal in the state of California.” - Norm McDonald after OJ’s verdict
Did you know that Bill Clinton murdered a guy?
Who is that? That very closeted gay guy?
Rip legend
Get back to the Jerma comment section you!
Murder is already legal in most places - at least under some circumstances.
He totally did it. And could not have acted more guilty afterwards.
Yep, but unfortunately the verdict was the correct one. It is a basic principle that it is better for a guilty person to go free, than for an innocent person to go to jail. So yeah, he did and everyone knows it. They just couldn't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
@@velocibadgery They could and if it wasn’t for a few mishaps, he would’ve been. The defense simply shone the spotlight away from OJ every time rather than actually defend him because there was nothing to defend but a cold blooded murderer.
@@velocibadgery But if he did it, and every reasonable person knows he did it, then how is it not demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt?
@@alistairkentucky-david9344 The problem stems from being able to prove 100% that he did it in a court of law. They are missing the evidence needed.
@@thatrandomdude9974 That's not what reasonable doubt means. By that standard, no one anywhere ever should be found guilty of anything. There's always an at least 0.00000...0001% chance someone is innocent.
He totally did that shit.
I have forgiven him
Never forget that 'opinion' isn't the same thing as 'knowledge'.
@@yuanruichen2564?? why would the people who were killed want YOU to forgive him
@@yuanruichen2564Nobody asked for your forgiveness. 😐
I saw a documentary from a well known PI who worked on the the case and i am completely convinced it was OJ's son and OJ was covering up for him. Police did a shitty ass job on this case.
*Not only is the "if" super tiny, yet also happens to be in a very dark red font to not contrast with the black.*
He should have just written a book about his football career.
*His Naked Gun cameo
"he dumb"
Yes, genius bcz people are interested in his football career after he murdered two people and got acquitted 🙄
@@lob1248 you're right. Clearly the better choice was to write a book about how he would have murdered them.
Why he had a more successful career in Murder.
this has the same energy as warnings at the bottom of a medicine commercial
"The guy I hired to do it sucked so much at it, I wrote a book just to show him how it's done" - O.J. Simpson
He didn’t hire no one, he did it himself, that motherfucker
Norm MacDonald be coming back to life to tell one more joke 😏 lol
I still have a copy so did some of my professors idk how all 400,000 were destroyed
“That n**** did that shit” - Dave Chapelle😂😂😂
“Naw my career can’t take this one” hahahaha
@vincent91 yeah true. He’s a big ol establishment lefty.
N** ? Nun?
@vincent91 weed aint a crime tho
better that than a christian fascist domestic t righty@@BlackElephantProject
The book cover designer deserves a raise.
He just doesn’t deserve a raise, he deserves to be famous
It was the family of the victims who made it possible. They had fair share since he was using the victims stories in a book he was writing.
One of those weird laws that apply to authors 😂
Sucks to suck my boi oj didn’t do nothing, the juice is loose 😍
There is a big difference between not guilty and innocent
Is that it? Could you elaborate cause yeah, I'm wondering how he's financially liable if he was "not guilty"?
@@SubUrbanSF I think you’re confused this person never said he was innocent they said the opposite idk why you got an attitude because you were confused? They were saying that basically just because they didn’t find him guilty doesn’t mean he was innocent, it’s a saying
@@SubUrbanSF Criminal Law has a higher standard of proof. Civil Law is more loose and only needs to prove 51% likely he murdered them.
So you can be criminally innocent but civilly guilty and liable
„Nicht entschuldig!”
He had the dumbest jury in history…
And THAT is how he paid off some of that civil lawsuit off.
Book 2: And I'll do it again.
Book 3: Dammit, I shouldn't have done it.
Book 4: It's hot in here...
@@doremind1 it probably is hot in hell where he is
Or book 2: Oops I did it again
3: I played with your heart
Sorry not to be disrespectful to the victim’s family, just the title immediately reminded me that lol
@@Tardu00 you kind of lost a little steam at the end there.
@@xinpingdonohoe3978 tbh.... at the beginning*
That’s honestly really funny. Props to the cover designer
I dont get it
@@AnnoyingPickle_0494watch the full thing
@@AnnoyingPickle_0494 The “If” is in tiny red print inside of the first i in “I DID IT” He zooms in on it in the video if you look very closely
@@AnnoyingPickle_0494you have to have autism
3 more likes for 1k
Bro was so excited that he wasn’t convicted that he got all cocky about it
Well according to the 5th amendment of the US Constitution, even if evidence that proved 100% that OJ’s the the killer, or even if OJ blatantly stated that he killed his wife, he’d have no fear of going to prison because the 5th amendment protects people from Double Jeopardy.
did you even watch the video? it was to make money he needed
If you followed the story and got to know the type of man OJ is you would know he wasn’t doing it to raise money out of the kindness of his heart. Narcissistic people love to brag about getting away with hurting people. His book was the most hurtful way he could have raised the money, that’s why he wrote it instead of a book about being accused. This clap back from the family is awesome.
I mean yeah beating a case like that is wild
I mean he still got away with it, and he probably gets some type of sick pleasure and enjoyment over the fact that he can blatantly make a book about it and still not get in trouble
That was a baller move by the victim's families.
This is literally the slickest book cover I've ever seen
Stolen
Jk
I mean he did steal it but it virtually means nothing it’s digital words
@@kevinp7861 No, I've seen at least 7. Gotcha!
@@ScientObject40lmao
IF I didn’t refill the OJ, this is why I wouldn’t have.
refill the oj?
@@seanm241 Orange Juice
@Listen, I know I sound gay, but… then you must not know many people
@@Cretlee ik that but you don't refill the orange juice you buy a new one
@@seanm241 Some people have a juice pitcher in their fridge.
“My hatred against geologists is purely theatrical…”
We live in a ridiculous world lol wtf
Obsidian
@MomPickMeUpImScared-st4wiwooden, since geologists can only see rocks and minerals
lmao the fact how everyone knows this reference
Person of exquisite taste.
He's guilty AF. There's no two ways about it.
Interesting fact: Many of the jurors were on an investigative news show (I forget which one it was) after the original verdict had been handed down and they were shown pieces of evidence that they were not allowed to see during the trial. Withholding evidence happens all the time in court cases as both sides negotiate with the judge. Anyway, MOST of the jurors that saw this previously unseen evidence said that *they would have voted "guilty".*
But there is a reason the evidence wasnt shown. So of course the prosecution regardless of moral standing would want that type of evidence seen.
@@1stAmendmentorDie1776I'm sure there is a reason, but the fact that these jurors said they would have voted him guilty if they had seen it is a bit troubling. Backroom deals between the prosecution and defense happens all the time and it's understandable why it happens most of the time because otherwise you'd have trials that go on forever because of magnitude of evidence, relevant or not. I wish I could remember what pieces of evidence were presented to them.
@@JustWasted3HoursHere
I can show any juror anything that can change their mind. Doesn't mean it should be allowed in court. That's why we have the entire process.
Womp womp
I'm just happy to live in a country that doesn't have juries in it's court system
I like how he stated after being acquitted that he was going to find the "REAL" murderer and then spent his time golfing.
Cut him some slack man. After that rough trial he had to take time to find himself.....wait...
Because that's his way of finding... himself.
@@thegrim418 oh- Ahahaha! xD
Thats because All he had to do was look at himself in the mirror.
had to spend that time,
to get to know the Real one right?
There's like 8 different covers, each one obscuring the "if" in a new, fun way.
Thanks for the info! That’s hilarious.
I could only find 3 variants of it, could you link to where you saw them?
"Fun"
I would have made a version with all lowercase, and turned the dot of the i in "i" into a tiny "IF"
At the time, this case was labeled as black vs white, but I would describe it as women vs male sports fans. The guys in my dorm thought he was innocent because he was too good of a football player. Some added that OJ couldn't have done it because he had a good sense of humor. The guys who stood up for him the most were all white. Me and all of the girls I knew (including my black friends) said he was guilty. Some of us had been in abusive relationships and saw the signs and the others just stood by the evidence. The guys down the hall (white sports fans) refused to consider any evidence and thought he was framed to defame his image.
Racist comment
Racist and sexist comment
OJ absolutely fucking did it.
I think he ordered the murdery
OJ all but outright admits it and makes a book detailing why and what he did.
Some other nigga: yeah but the shrunk glove don't fit
Or did he
1000%. Wasn't he seen leaving the house....
Yes but he's rich and in this society we let the rich do whatever they want to us.
His kids have to live with the fact that their father wrote a book about how he would have "hypothetically" killed their mother.
His kids already have to live with the fact that their father murdered their mother, I think the existence of the book is an afterthought
Just like the Kardashians have to live with the fact their money originally came from defending people like O.J. . . .
His eldest daughter actually proposed the idea for the book.
@@kentknightofcaelin4537 I was just about to say that his kids came up with the idea
@@kentknightofcaelin4537 oh wow, I didn't know that! I'm going to look into that backstory. Thanks!
If you’re old enough to remember every step of the trial, you’d know that he DEFINITELY did it
I am, and he did.
I remember where I was and who I was with when the verdict was broadcast.
My mom said she was glad because she'd rather see a guilty man go free, than an innocent man get locked up.
I disagree. That man should have been locked away, the jury screwed up.
There is literally an SNL sketch where O.J. is back in court over another crime and the judge literally had to ask aliens and people in 30 year coma recoveries to be the jury.
But, the glove didn't fit... duh.
He’s innocent
@@ImNotaRussianBotand another sketch where he’s commentating a football game and draws lines on the screen that start to spell out “I DID IT” 😂
This is Petty on both sides of the fence Petty from OJ and Petty from the family. This is just a petty party and I'm here for it 😂😂😂
this was an unusual topic for vsauce to take on
Yeah I thought so too, but it makes sense for the RUclips Shorts/TikTok format. Both platforms reward storytelling and Michael has always been into sharing crazy stories.
It was an interesting one!
Atleast for us Non Americans wo doesn't knew about this
And yet it’s no less important. Let people never forget that a famous hall of fame football player got away with murder.
He does cover dark topics occasionally
@lucky_lol I don't think it's non Americans, I think it's younger people. I'm not American but my parents were very much stuck to the OJ trial on TV at the time. I only learned about it from the American Crime Story show though