It's come to my attention that the Samsung JG50 actually does not have FreeSync. While it's still a great price, if you want Adaptive Sync we'd recommend spending a bit more to get either the Viotek GN27D or MSI Optix MAG27CQ depending on what price you can get
@@JamesRussoMillas it depends on your eyes, i have msi mag24c amd freesync, i tested it with vega 56 around 2 weeks, and then go back to gtx 1070ti, i cant really see any difference, but there is someone out there can Game Test : AC Oddysey run around 60 fps on both card
On Amazon USA, you can buy the Dell S2417DG YNY1D 24" 1440p 165 Hz G-Sync display for just $379! Which IMO for a 1 ms Panel WITH 2560x1440 res at 165 Hz - is a DECENT price even without G-Sync but with, it is EASILY the best price on any G-Sync equipped monitor, epsecially given the rest of the specs! Only downside IMO: It IS a TN panel. That said IF I Had the cash, I would buy this monitor NOW! 24" is ideal for my desk and how close I sit, and that pixel density is INSANE! Only thing is - i would have to give up my IPS Acer G257HU smidpx 25" 1440p monitor, which I do have "Overclocked" to 85 Hz, which is nothing to sneeze at! Personally, I will run this monitor UNTIL I have the ~$450 needed to buy a high refresh rate IPS 1440p monitor with G-sync, because IF I were to ever own such a monitor, it would be my main monitor for at least 5 years! I am coming up on 3 years with my Acer G257HU.
G-Sync adds like 50% extra price. For example 1080 144Hz monitors with FreeSync usually go for around $200-$250 while a G-Sync equivalent easily goes for $300-$400
@@RoboGamerNL oh my. You extrapolated the % from an example. G-Sync adds 200$, and like your example you go from 200 to 400, but from 400 to 600, not 800.
Just remember that with more demanding titles and higher refresh rates youd need a stronger GPU. That being said, the stronger AMD GPUs are higher priced than their Nvidia Pascal rivals. They pretty much even out in price.
i so agree on that, big screens makes no sense, better just adding second monitors for productivity or multitasking. also big screen sizes makes the pixels bigger, i though we wanted small pixels so the picture is clearer? 1080p 22" is fine, 27 on 1440p. not sure about 2160p, 28 to 32" should look fine. leaning on 28" since 32" is just to much head movement and image also gets distorted(and color gets worse) when looking at great angles.
I get that your biggest audience is from the US, but I wanted to watch this because you’re Australian, and I’m Australian, and so I’d hope that there’d be info for the Aus market... don’t forget the home audience...
Does anyone still make *truly good* 1080p monitors? It seems like FHD has been relegated to the bargain category, and that takes a lot of choice away from those of us who think higher resolutions are a waste of performance potential on desktop screens. Also, I hate curved monitors. If your 1080p pick is going to be curved, how about a flat runner-up?
@@pyro226 well preferably 1440p and refresh rate a little higher than 60-75hz, i havent build a pc yet but i'll probably get a 1070 or 1080ti or something
Why mention the Acer Predator at the end but not the Asus PG27UQ when they're essentially the same monitor? The panel is the same at least and they're currently the same price.
4:35 not only that but it's also possible to just limit the hertz to 60 when you can't hit the high framerates, but have a monitor capable of higher when you upgrade later down the line.
When I spoke to Pixio they said the same but I said I really wanted to get a PX329 in early 2019 and they said let them know when I was ready to upgrade hinting that they'll probably ship one out for me. Worth asking them I reckon. Absolute awesome monitor that model. Can't wait to get one in my hands. Also check their optional full adjustable solid stands out, they are also impressive but unfortunately are constantly sold out on the stand. Just shows how well their products are being received.
They do, the RTX 2080ti falls on its face and crawls away when it sees my build. 4k gaming is NOT for single GPUs, I tried on my Titan Xp collectors edition, but it was an absolute joke with any settings on high. At least Fortnite ran 67 fps (no AA obviously), but that's Fortnite, so I should hope it does over 60 fps, and it barely did even that! Benchmarks in about a month, I'm doing about 75 fps when RTX 2080ti is around 55 fps (Crysis 3 at 4k Ultra), however it looks like my setup isn't correct. Either I need my TR 1950x back up at 4.15 Ghz with 3600 quad channel memory, or I have some power saving feature enabled, which I think is the actual issue since I saw clock throttling with cards at 50c, my PSU is also certainly overloaded as well, LOL!
They do, the RTX 2080ti falls on its face and crawls away when it sees my build. 4k gaming is NOT for single GPUs, I tried on my Titan Xp collectors edition, but it was an absolute joke with any settings on high. At least Fortnite ran 67 fps (no AA obviously), but that's Fortnite, so I should hope it does over 60 fps, and it barely did even that! Benchmarks in about a month, I'm doing about 75 fps when RTX 2080ti is around 55 fps (Crysis 3 at 4k Ultra), however it looks like my setup isn't correct. Either I need my TR 1950x back up at 4.15 Ghz with 3600 quad channel memory, or I have some power saving feature enabled, which I think is the actual issue since I saw clock throttling with cards at 50c, my PSU is also certainly overloaded as well, LOL!
@@MunkeyChips I'm saying the do have "competitive" graphics products, I'm doing this with under $700 in GPUs, and it will take 2x RTX 2080ti ($2600) to beat it by a little bit, and even considering its kicking around a $1200-1400 Nvidia GPU, I'd say its pretty "competitive" in both price, value, and ridiculous performance as long as you don't get stuck in the single GPU mentality (otherwise you'll also get console fps at 4k...)
Nope, I prefer IPS for rich colors and for the overall latency of a monitor the display technology is the smallest factor. I agree fully on 1440p 144Hz though.
@@PizzaOMC I had a TN before, I know VA panels (yes, good ones ;) ). I still prefer IPS and I can't tell the difference in response time between any of them. btw: your username, I like it.
@@noenken I mean the hz frequency is a matter of view, most games run just fine at 90hz because their engine only updates 60 times (ticks) per second, CS:GO on public servers is the best example with 64tps (64 per second). Minecraft is even "worse" in this case with only 20 ticks per second, so you could play Minecraft on 20hz and you wouldn't be able to spot a real difference to 240hz in that specific title. Most Battlefield 4 Servers run at 30 ticks per second, some at 60, a few on 120 and only a very small amount at the max of 144. For Example if you'd play Battlefield 4 on 240hz on the best server you won't get a real advantage over 144hz because even if your fps was 240 the Game "only" updates 144 times per Second. So i think combined in value and performance 144hz Monitors will be King of the Hill for at least 2-3 more Years before 165/180hz Monitors will replace them, until you get real advantages of 240hz at least 5 years will pass by and 288hz will be out then.
Bart // Robo true, nobody mentions it, I just bought it 2 weeks ago at micro center for $160 dollars, and this monitor is better than both the AOC and the Viotek, but no youtubers mention it or make a review on that monitor, the colors are good, the design is one of the best
BEST of all for under $100: LG | 22MK430H-B | 21.5" | Panel IPS | FreeSync | 1920x1080 | 16:9 | 75Hz | 178/178 degrees Bought it a month ago, cost only 93 bucks (still is). Best all around(for everyday use and 60-75fps gaming) Monitor for budget users.
60Hz Freesync in 4K is always a great choice no matter the price, of the overpriced, I need more frame rate liar's that shill for these expensive over priced rip off monitor's ... Fuck frame Rate's past 60 FPS, I want 4K beautiful Visual's.... All you need is a good TN 4K 32" and up 60Hz HDR monitor for the next 5 to 10 years.. Because even Nvidia is having trouble with That Ripp off 2080TI maintaining 60 fps, so why would anyone try and buy a 144FPs 4K monitor that has NO GRAPHICS'S CARD TO MATCH THAT Fram rate!!!! What a Joke...
32" @ 1440p is equivalent to 24" @ 1080p, so yeah it IS better than 27" @ 1080p if you consider pixel density. And if you're doing something other than gaming on your PC it's a decent choice.
@@EvilZlo That density, on the big screen, doesn't look so good to me. But maybe I'm just fucked.....Macbook Retina 15 since 2013 and 27" 4K for almost two years now. I visited a friend with a 31.5" 1440p 165hz g-sync to try it out as we were considering a trade for my 4K as he needed cash but found out I'm too used to that awesome pixel density to make the swap and pay for it. I definitely liked the 32" size though, maybe I just need more time with it. Will try again sometime, but I guess I'm not switching until HDR matures, cause then I'll have to buy a new one again when it does...
When i was out looking for a monitor i read a ton of reviews, but i wanted 1440p 144 hz 27 inches, and Dell S2716DG 27" was the one getting the absolute best reviews. I was skeptical because "Oh TN panels are not IPS and their colors suck!" i ended up pulling the trigger anyways because i found a sale for 325$ on it, and boy was it worth it. Fuck everyone who calls TN shit, i literally cannot see the difference between my old IPS and this baller new monitor. But muh viewing angles, i sit infront of it all the time, fuck viewing angles.
Nice video Tim, but next time could you recommend 4k monitor for less then 1,550$ please.... Oh, btw for the price of g-sync you can get brand new RX580...lol
If you want a relatively cheap 4K monitor, go search Amazon for LG 4K IPS monitors. They have a 27" 4K IPS monitor on sale right now for $300. Good luck!
I've had decent luck with my "upstar" 4k monitors (only a sample size of 3 on refurbs, but they were good). Pros: REAL glass (you can clean nacho cheese off with your fingernails and never worry about scratching them, normal plastic film monitors scratch almost just from looking at them). Real aluminum/glass base (just nicer than the cheap flimsy plastic ones on "gaming" monitors). Cons: No speakers, no HDMI 2.0 support (I've overclocked the HDMI 1.2 to 55 fps, but just use DP cable like most cards do). Low frequency overclocking headroom (I've only hit 66 Hz on mine, but then again my cables are pretty junk got the door slammed on a few times...). HEAVY! These things are silly heavy, something like 30 pounds! If you're going hiking and carrying monitors, then you might want the flimsy 5 pound ones, but otherwise its no issue if they just sit there. In all, I think these are much nicer than the Asus 4k monitors my cousins have. They don't look like cheap plastic toys, and they are decently well built. You will need a behemoth for running 4k at Ultra, a single RTX 2080ti just won't cut it. I'm rocking 4x R9 Fury with Threadripper, but if you're doing low/medium settings, then you'll get good frame rates with even an RX 580. I run 3x 4k for workstation/CAD/video editing/etc, and just 1x 4k for games. I had tried using a Titan Xp collectors edition, but that was a joke for High settings! I fully recommend 1440p if you're only gaming, because it looks nice, and it doesn't take a monster to run it 60 fps (plus you get high fps and Hz for the games that can use it!). Hope this helps, cheers!
I scored an Acer 144hz 1080p 24 inch Kg241 TN monitor for $150 at my local Microcenter! Unfortunately I had to return my first one due to a dead pixel, but they replaced it for free. So far so good with the second one. Do you think I got a good deal?
I don't get the point of gsync. I got a 1440/144 monitor, and it doesn't have gsync, and I never see under 100 FPS and never see tearing. When is gsync useful?
@@circleofsorrow4583 You must just not be sensitive to tearing, because if you're not v-synced (which introduces input lag) or above 144fps on your panel, it's there.
@@Vonliktenstien Oh bud, no. Tearing is less noticeable at a higher refresh rate. Just because "it's there" doesn't mean it's noticeable. Also, FYI, you don't use G-Sync if you're running at 100FPS on a 144Hz monitor, because it wouldn't help a thing.
@@circleofsorrow4583 G-Sync(or Freesync) is more useful on 60Hz monitors, mainly because it's significantly easier to achieve 60FPS than 144FPS lol, but also because tearing is much less noticeable at a higher refresh rate(unless something is really wrong obv). G-Sync works best right below your monitor's refresh rate. So on a 144Hz panel, you'd want to achieve higher than 144FPS, but artificially cap your game at 142/143Hz and then turn G-Sync on. Whether or not that would actually be worth it is going to depend on the game you're playing, and your GPU.
You're not much of a gamer, all I play are FPS games .. tearing is a serious problem and G-Sync solved the problem with nearly no added input lag. Also TN panels today are damn good and this viewing angle phobia is silly considering you're never going to use (ever) the monitor that way.
*Alienware AW2518HF* is the most beautiful gaming monitor I've ever bought. it's also the fastest 240Hz monitor on the market atm. Even when set at 144Hz it destroys my BenQ XL2411 in terms of input lag.
TN panels are trash and makes my eyes hurt! That why I replaced me BenQ 24" 144Hz TN with a Sammy 32" 1440p 144Hz VN panel. i wouldn't use a TN panel if it was mudda FREE!
True. But good IPS monitors have 4ms response time (even cheap ones) and 240Hz ... well you made me giggle. Maybe if you plan RTX2080ti in SLI. My GTX1080 on ultra settings @ 1080p is struggling to deliver 80-85fps in last Tomb Raider title. A 120/144/240hz monitor would be useless here. I do have a 75Hz, 4ms, 1080p IPS display and it looks stunning. Way better than my old TN, 1ms, 100Hz monitor Now, a IPS/VA panel at 4ms, 120Hz, 1440p is what I'm looking for next.
There are plenty of good TN panels. I use the PG278Q and without calibration it nailed the whitepoint (6502K is only 2K off), avarage gamma was 2.2 (which is exactly on point) and avarage color deviation (dE) of 1.2 which means you can only see the difference if there is a perfect monitor next to it. Just because most shitty monitors use TN does not mean that TN always sucks. Many people make that mistake.
I just finished my first gaming pc build it has a i7 8700k with a gtx 1080 gpu and need some help choosing a (27 inch) monitor. I'm looking at the ASUS VG278Q 27" Full HD 1080p 144Hz and the Acer XG270HU Red 144HZ WQHD 2K 2560x1440. Would I be able to run a 2K 2560x1440 monitor with the i7 8700k and gtx 1080 gpu? With the money I've got into this build I don't want to chince out with the monitor, is it better and worth it to spend the extra money and get a FULL G-Sync monitor like the ASUS ROG Swift PG278QR 27" 165Hz, Dell Gaming S2716DGR 144Hz?
I just bought the recently released AOC AGON AG322QC4 31.5'' 1440p 1800R Curved FreeSync 2 (48-144LFC) HDR400 144Hz Gaming Monitor for AU$592 (normally $639) VA panel and the HDR is at the entry end without local dimming, but in my case that worked in its favour as I wasn't really looking for HDR mainly because of the local dimming halo effect and a good VA SDR @ 3000:1 already looks awesome, this just takes that up a notch. I was all set to order the AOC CQ32G1 31.5" 144Hz 1440p VA panel with 1ms response time for AU$499, until I looked up just what 1ms MPRT was (Flashing/strobing back lights to simulate 1ms) and rethought that, it also doesn't carry the AGON branding (potentially cheaping out on some components). Maybe Tim could look into MPRT and let us know if it's any good, if he hasn't already and I missed it. Anyway the Agon 2QC4 was just $100 more and technically has all the bells and whistles I need plus bonuses without spending $800-$1000+ (27" too small) In my mind full HDR1000 won't be great on LCD panels because of the local dimming halo issue and until Oled fix the burn in problem or microled becomes an affordable thing, then HDR 400 as implemented on the 2QC4will suffice me to get my feet wet.
I want to buy a 4k Monitor and downscale newer games to 1080p but I´m reading a lot about blurred scaling. Does someone know if this is this still the case?
For what it's worth, I just set Windows 10 to 150% scaling on my 4K monitor and I've never had a problem. Most apps scale very well or fairly well. Games running at 1080p on my monitor look similar to what they did on my 1080p monitor, although it's worth noting that each manufacturer has different algorithms for interpolation and the like, so your experience may vary depending on which specific monitor you choose. I've had good luck with LG, but you should always read a few reviews of any monitor online before purchasing.
@@SirSilicon You won't get any downscale blur with a 1080p image on a 4k panel. 4k is exactly 4x the resolution of 1080p, so each pixel just becomes 4 pixels. The reason some resolutions don't scale is because they aren't a multiplication of the other, for example 1440p is around 1.8x the resolution of 1080p, so each pixel at 1080p would take up slightly more than 1 pixel on a 1440p monitor but less than 2, as a result they don't scale properly and you get blur. I probably haven't described that well, so in simple terms, 1440p on 4k will blur, 1080p on 1440p will blur, but 1080p on 4k won't blur. If this is what you want to do, it will work perfectly fine.
@@dog-jk2hn 1080p on 4K can blur though, it depends how it's being scaled, if 1 to 4 then it shouldn't, but if not then it will, my m9onitor says it supports 1 to 4 pixel mapping but it still looks blurry tbh, no matter what setting or sharpness in Nvidia Control Panel I use, you have to see it for yourself to see what I mean. It works better on console it seems though if using XBOX ONE X on 1080p panel in 4K game
60fps master race ;p, and 4k is pretty hard to run, even in 2018. 1440p 144hz all the way, maybe in 5 years when gpu's are better and 4k 120/144hz monitors are cheaper than 4k is a better option. But for competitive games 4k is not the best, and even for the average person a 4k monitor is not the most practical.
@@Dennell_Mount_and_Blade it's not as hard to run as everyone makes out at all. The games testers and media always run max settings at 4k when you don't need it. Like AA for example is not as helpful as it is at 1080p or 1440p
This guy is off base. It's this simple. 1080p - go 24" to 27"; 2K - 27" to 32" and 4K - 32" and above. For standard viewing distance and available operating systems, you start here. Only then, depending on your budget and research should you make your choice. Right now, I recommend this LG - www.newegg.ca/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100898525%20600417886%20601115272&IsNodeId=1&Description=IPS%20gaming%20monitors&bop=And&Order=PRICE&PageSize=36. There are also 2 4K HDR models at a price of $2600 Canadian; however these are only 27" models. I would wait for a 32" version and the price to go down of course. In my mind, I always choose the monitor first and then build the PC around it, depending on what your uses will be. In the end what will you be staring at all day; your PC or your monitor???
Hey Tim! What's your opinion on the Acer XF0 XF270HUA (the 1440p, 144hz, IPS, Freesync-Version) for about 400€. is the IPS Display worth the extra money compared to your 1440p recommendations (Samsung JG50 ~340€ and Pixio PX329 not available in my region)? Best regards, serubb
I would definitely recommend Samsung C27HG70, it's in the sweet spot for PC gaming: FreeSync (indespensable nowadays), 144 Hz, 27 ", 1440p, good colors, plus you can benefit from HDR (just try FFXV or Far Cry 5 and you'll realize). For a competitive price point: $450.
5 лет назад
The Samsung JG50 has washed out colors... PIXO 32" is just a train wreck of quality control and shipping issues along with picture and bleed.. Viotek GN34C 34" suffers from both of the issues mentioned from both previous monitors mentioned. The Acer Predator has backlight bleed on par with much older lower end monitors.. It seems like Monitors lately are just either quality picture or performance lacking, there isn't a single monitor mentioned here that can do or has done both.. EXCEPT...
Buying a monitor is so confusing. I've read most of the comments here and there is literally people trashing VA, TN, IPS, 60hz, 144hz, 240hz, curved screens, 4k, Freesync, and G-sync. Wtf should I buy? I was leaning towards the Acer Ed347 because it seemed good at under $500 but after reading these comments I am not sure anymore.
I bought the Acer XB271HU 1440P 144Hz and the XB271HK 4K 60Hz from Amazon just to compare them. At the end I see a lot of quality difference in favour of the 4K panel even by simply viewving a 4K youtube video or playing games without absolutely no aliasing and much sharper textures. I returned the 2K 144Hz and 4K 60Hz is on my desk. This is a question of tastes.
Hold on a minute, fake HDR? You mean, entry level HDR. Just becasue your panel cant reach 1000nits, or you dont have a full array backlight, or you have a '9 bit'?panel doesnt make the HDR fake. You still get a HDR signal through the TV, if it was fake HDR you wouldn't get any picture at all from HDR content because the TV cannot decode it. As for quality, even an entry level HDR give you an image calibrated for much higher contrast and backlight so when you put them on full the entire image doesnt get destroyed. If your tv/monitor has good native blacks regardless of a full dynamic backlight, you will still see benefits in much brighter highlights. Just my experience.
Looking for honest answers. I'm searching for a monitor for my Xbox one x and am wondering what 24-27inch monitor I should get. Is freesync worth it? I currently game on tcl p605 which for the price is a pretty damn good TV for gaming, but i need a backup monitor for when my wife wants to watch TV. I also may be getting a computer for the holidays but have no idea if it will be with amd or nvidia (I'm assuming nvidia tho, which further complicates the matter cause than gsync would be preferred). So hypothetically, I have a decent nvidia gpu that can run 1440p over 60fps and an Xbox one x (which I will be playing more), what monitor will maximize my situation?
Refurb S2716DGR for $315 USD at Bestbuy.com, they had new in box for $349.99 last week. It's a TN panel, but plenty of people are fans of the Asus PG278Q right? Best deal on a proper name brand, 27 inch, g-sync, 2560x1440, 144hz, 1ms
I had a G2460P. I bought a much nicer 160Hz VA panel, but it wasn’t better for gaming. I couldn’t figure out why the VA felt less smooth at 160Hz than the TN at 144. It’s because of the VA monitor’s smearing effect. Fast motion makes it look like motion blur is on.
How could you NOT mention the Alienware AW3418DW for $899 on Amazon right now?! I got it for a grand over a year ago and it's still glorious. It's a shame, it has been overlooked by the Hardware Cannucks and many others. Makes me very curious to say the least.
Just pulled the trigger on the Acer Z35P, although I'm keeping my 4K Samsung KS8500. I really hope I'm not disappointed moving from 16:9 4K@60hz HDR 1000+ nits to 21:9 1440p@120hz 300nits. We'll see.
Howdy Guys One quick NOTE that Pixio PX329 Price is off ...the cheapest you will find it here in the States is $399 so not sure where you got $349 even ebay is selling it for $459 its been way OP for Months here, maybe they are showing yall over there its cheaper but it has not been for a while I have been looking to buy one for my son since may and this $399 is the lowest its been they did not even do a Black Friday or cyber Monday sale which it sad to say!~
What is ur opinion on pixio px276h with HDR version monitor price is $319. Or I should buy pixio px276 without HDR price $309. By the way I only play competitive game like DotA 2 and PUBG. Can u pls tell me what should I buy ?
So refreshing (pun not intended) to have realistic recommendations for monitors. Reviewers like Linus seem to appeal to consumers with money to burn so it's always bleeding edge 8K $1000+ stuff. Glad you highlight the fact that 4K still isn't good for the majority of gamers as well as HDR.
Says 4k high refresh rate monitors are prohibitively expensive, and instead recommends a $1500 monitor lol wtf I was expecting something in the $800 range max after that statement... If your ready to spend$1500 I reckon most would just go for the $2000 4k high refresh model instead
I picked up a 34 inch LG 2560 x 1080 144hz free sync. It’s pixel density is much higher than my old 27 inch 1080 p work horse. It’s under $500 now on sale and it’s awesome. Unless your running a 2080 I highly recommended it.
I had 4 144 hz monitors, lg g24mg79, Viewsonic xg2402, BenQ 2411 (if im right) and Samsung cfg73, and Samsung is best for gaming and all around with great contrast colors and so on, TN monitors is awful man
I can recommend the Dell s2417DG, here in Germany it's ~400€ for a 1440p 165hz G Sync Monitor. The only drawback is the fact that it has a Tn panel, but the g sync support at that price is more important for me.
What ever happened to the Pixio PX277? It was a 27" 1440p 144hz IPS monitor for $400 that was released about 4 months ago but they've been out of stock for some time now. Feels like they got rid of it almost instantly
Dell Gaming Monitor S2417DG YNY1D 24-Inch Screen LED-Lit TN with G-SYNC, QHD 2560 x 1440, 165Hz Refresh Rate, 1ms Response Time, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Its under $380
pushing people to purchase VA monitors seems wrong. As Pual's Hardware and Toms Hardware both say VA panel monitors is on the very Low End of monitors. They both suggest people to get either a TN or nano-IPS or IPS panel monitor. They both also mentioned that TN panels are for gamers and any IPS panels are for content creators.
I just finished looking at stocks and the sign is the world economy is slowing down. People keep hold of your money, not worth spending money now when in January all tech companies will have a reality check. In a single day 1 trillion dollars of loss for tech companies. Nvidia stock has devalued over $100. This ridiculous pricing has to be corrected.
best price performance for 1440p with g-sync and IPS panel 144 hz and 165 hz OC is the Acer Predator XB271HU. great 27 inch with amazing colors and high pixel count
All these VA panels are garbage at high refresh rates for gaming, they have all kinds of ghosting and weird sharpness problems. IPS or TN is the way to go for high refresh rate gaming. Adaptive refresh technology is not worth the price I agree but I'll gladly pay a 200$ premium for an IPS panel.
Yeah nah. I'll stick with my old ass Benq RL2445. Still outperforms a huge majority of monitors for FPS games and I think they were like $100 on black Friday.
Someone can find me a good monitor around $200. With Full HD IPS 24" or more 75hz and 5ms response time or less. If someone can I would really appriciate that because i finding for weeks
1440p 60hz 27inch with great color accuracy and latency isnt a real problem: BenQ GW2765HT. Search on internet for best color settings and youll get accurate colors.
1440p 32" EU option?....that pixio looks sweet however not available in our region, same as Viotek :(( sucks to live on this side of the ocean, when it comes to shopping for electronics
It looks like time for some decent and a bit more affordable 4K gaming monitors is still about 2-3 years away, if not further away then that... The industry is moving ahead frustratingly slow!
I have a dell u2715h ips (dell top of the line 2015) and a s2716dg tn 144 hz gsync and honesly the tn pannel is not To bad at all after calibratiln. For gaming its a super value
If you want a relatively good value on a g-sync monitor, the Dell S2417dg has treated me well the past year. It regularly goes on sale for 330, which is what I got it for. Ticks a lot of boxes for competitive gaming (I play a lot of Overwatch), but is completely serviceable in AAA titles as well. The one thing is a lot of color banding in dark video but I've never seen it in game.
what is your opinion on the 'AOC Agon AG241QX' ? its the cheapest 1440p 144hz monitor where i am staying in europe , its currently seeling for 330 euro .
Currently there is very little options for 1440p ultrawide gsync. The few options are very pricey. Do you think we will get a bunch of new models and price drops?
I picked up the predetor for ips 144 for under 500 few months back I am very happy with it and gsync I think it's a top monitor 1440p is the sweet spot
It's come to my attention that the Samsung JG50 actually does not have FreeSync. While it's still a great price, if you want Adaptive Sync we'd recommend spending a bit more to get either the Viotek GN27D or MSI Optix MAG27CQ depending on what price you can get
I am finding a 1440p-UltraWide(it's good if 32")-144hz-G Sync-IPS Display.
in spain (europe) there is no viotek nor pixio..... and i can´t find on amazon the jg50.
@@TTks124 I feel your pain bro....even though I'm on the opposite edge of the continent. :)
@@JamesRussoMillas it depends on your eyes, i have msi mag24c amd freesync, i tested it with vega 56 around 2 weeks, and then go back to gtx 1070ti, i cant really see any difference, but there is someone out there can
Game Test : AC Oddysey run around 60 fps on both card
On Amazon USA, you can buy the Dell S2417DG YNY1D 24" 1440p 165 Hz G-Sync display for just $379! Which IMO for a 1 ms Panel WITH 2560x1440 res at 165 Hz - is a DECENT price even without G-Sync but with, it is EASILY the best price on any G-Sync equipped monitor, epsecially given the rest of the specs!
Only downside IMO: It IS a TN panel. That said IF I Had the cash, I would buy this monitor NOW! 24" is ideal for my desk and how close I sit, and that pixel density is INSANE! Only thing is - i would have to give up my IPS Acer G257HU smidpx 25" 1440p monitor, which I do have "Overclocked" to 85 Hz, which is nothing to sneeze at!
Personally, I will run this monitor UNTIL I have the ~$450 needed to buy a high refresh rate IPS 1440p monitor with G-sync, because IF I were to ever own such a monitor, it would be my main monitor for at least 5 years! I am coming up on 3 years with my Acer G257HU.
Best 1080p Monitors
1:38 Viotek GN24C
2:31 AOC G2460PF
Best 1440p High Refresh Monitors
4:00 Samsung JG50 27"
4:08 Pixio PX329 32"
Best Ultra Wide Monitors
6:00 Viotek GN34C 34"
Best 4K Monitors
7:50 Dell UltraSharp UP2718Q
9:07 Asus ProArt PA32UC
Best HDR Monitors
11:37 Acer Predator X27
You're awesome!
Thx
This needs to be higher.
Thanks
This needs to be pinned. hehheehe
All these monitors get 0/10 for their names.
I don't know about you but I don't brag by code, but X pixel, N Hz
Naaaa, 1/10, 0/10 would be no name
Totally fu671n6 agree.
In all honesty these no named monitors are just as good as the named monitors. They use the same internals and display panels.
what do you mean?
I feel like I'm cheating on my monitor right in front of it by looking at other monitors...
Noticed that all the value monitors has Freesync
G-Sync adds like 50% extra price.
For example 1080 144Hz monitors with FreeSync usually go for around $200-$250 while a G-Sync equivalent easily goes for $300-$400
@@RoboGamerNL oh my. You extrapolated the % from an example. G-Sync adds 200$, and like your example you go from 200 to 400, but from 400 to 600, not 800.
Sadly Gsync uses a Nvidia proprietary hardware module to implement gsync while freesync is open source and works with any monitor
Just remember that with more demanding titles and higher refresh rates youd need a stronger GPU. That being said, the stronger AMD GPUs are higher priced than their Nvidia Pascal rivals. They pretty much even out in price.
@DragoonDark97 you skipped math class, didnt you?
Speaking of old monitors I'm still using a Dell 3007wfp 2560x1600. 10 years and going strong.
Those older Dells are bulletproof. I'm still using my 1600x1200 flat-panel from 2005. Still holds up.
I have an old (I don't know exactly how old but I think it's around ten years) Acer monitor :P
Resolution: 1400x1050
16:10 for the win!
Me 1280x1024.. the square lcd monitor..
32 inch screen is no good for gaming, at least competitive play, too big and you have to move your head as opposed to flicking your eyes around.
i so agree on that, big screens makes no sense, better just adding second monitors for productivity or multitasking.
also big screen sizes makes the pixels bigger, i though we wanted small pixels so the picture is clearer?
1080p 22" is fine, 27 on 1440p. not sure about 2160p, 28 to 32" should look fine. leaning on 28" since 32" is just to much head movement and image also gets distorted(and color gets worse) when looking at great angles.
I get that your biggest audience is from the US, but I wanted to watch this because you’re Australian, and I’m Australian, and so I’d hope that there’d be info for the Aus market... don’t forget the home audience...
It's only logical they cater to the largest audience. Stop complaining.
I hear you, half of those monitors are not available in Europe also, so I am little bit disappointed... :(
Imagine almost every monitor set to its company home language? Malus makes sense. Cater to the larger audience.
@@terabitdefiance8022 australians speak english...
@@Malus1531 hurr durr literally every youtuber on the site should cater to me
Dell S2417DG, 165 Hz with 1440p at 1 ms and Gsync for $360 USD. Great value imo
Does anyone still make *truly good* 1080p monitors? It seems like FHD has been relegated to the bargain category, and that takes a lot of choice away from those of us who think higher resolutions are a waste of performance potential on desktop screens.
Also, I hate curved monitors. If your 1080p pick is going to be curved, how about a flat runner-up?
@@no-yg9zq he means high-end monitors
AOC C24G1 is very cheap and a really good alternative to Viotek GN24C for us europeans. Thumbs up to spread the word.
1:11 Best 1080p
3:20 Best 1440p monitor
5:35 Best Ultrawide
7:10 Best 4K
9:32 Best HDR
Thank you ✌️
Best IPS?
@@raggedyexynos6826 What size and resolution are you looking for? (Also, what is your current graphics card?)
@@pyro226 well preferably 1440p and refresh rate a little higher than 60-75hz, i havent build a pc yet but i'll probably get a 1070 or 1080ti or something
@@raggedyexynos6826 About what size?
Viotek monitors not available in Europe :(
can we be looking to get another one of these before black friday in 2019 ? :)
I do not see the point of a 24 inch not even 27 inch curved display. Yes for 21:9 or for large 32 inch 16:9. Just my humble opinion.
Totally agree. I hate curved 16:9 monitors.
Helps with certain eye stipulations. Easier for some to see.
I will remove my thumbs down if you do a follow up video relevant to Australia. Go on, Tim. You can do it.
Why mention the Acer Predator at the end but not the Asus PG27UQ when they're essentially the same monitor? The panel is the same at least and they're currently the same price.
True . but keep in mind that other youtubers said that the acer was making a weird noise.
4:35 not only that but it's also possible to just limit the hertz to 60 when you can't hit the high framerates, but have a monitor capable of higher when you upgrade later down the line.
Completely Useless video for anyone outside the US.
Viotech, Pixio aren't even available outside the US, at least not officially.
Well dont live outside the US.
When I spoke to Pixio they said the same but I said I really wanted to get a PX329 in early 2019 and they said let them know when I was ready to upgrade hinting that they'll probably ship one out for me.
Worth asking them I reckon. Absolute awesome monitor that model. Can't wait to get one in my hands. Also check their optional full adjustable solid stands out, they are also impressive but unfortunately are constantly sold out on the stand. Just shows how well their products are being received.
@@Dr.D00p lol, your loss. You couldn't pay me enough to live anywhere else.
They just said the video was mainly focused on the US market and yet you weigh the video outside the US?????
Back to back world war champions, best country in the world
What is the difference between Samsung C27HG50 and Samsung C27JG50?
AMD needs a more competitive Graphics product, if for no other reason than to force Nvidia to start supporting FreeSync. Screw the Nvidia tax.
They do, the RTX 2080ti falls on its face and crawls away when it sees my build. 4k gaming is NOT for single GPUs, I tried on my Titan Xp collectors edition, but it was an absolute joke with any settings on high. At least Fortnite ran 67 fps (no AA obviously), but that's Fortnite, so I should hope it does over 60 fps, and it barely did even that!
Benchmarks in about a month, I'm doing about 75 fps when RTX 2080ti is around 55 fps (Crysis 3 at 4k Ultra), however it looks like my setup isn't correct. Either I need my TR 1950x back up at 4.15 Ghz with 3600 quad channel memory, or I have some power saving feature enabled, which I think is the actual issue since I saw clock throttling with cards at 50c, my PSU is also certainly overloaded as well, LOL!
They do, the RTX 2080ti falls on its face and crawls away when it sees my build. 4k gaming is NOT for single GPUs, I tried on my Titan Xp collectors edition, but it was an absolute joke with any settings on high. At least Fortnite ran 67 fps (no AA obviously), but that's Fortnite, so I should hope it does over 60 fps, and it barely did even that!
Benchmarks in about a month, I'm doing about 75 fps when RTX 2080ti is around 55 fps (Crysis 3 at 4k Ultra), however it looks like my setup isn't correct. Either I need my TR 1950x back up at 4.15 Ghz with 3600 quad channel memory, or I have some power saving feature enabled, which I think is the actual issue since I saw clock throttling with cards at 50c, my PSU is also certainly overloaded as well, LOL!
@@jakegarrett8109 Uh wut? That's cool and all but I don't think your comment has anything to do with mine.
@@MunkeyChips I'm saying the do have "competitive" graphics products, I'm doing this with under $700 in GPUs, and it will take 2x RTX 2080ti ($2600) to beat it by a little bit, and even considering its kicking around a $1200-1400 Nvidia GPU, I'd say its pretty "competitive" in both price, value, and ridiculous performance as long as you don't get stuck in the single GPU mentality (otherwise you'll also get console fps at 4k...)
Fake HDR or not I love my samsung c49hg90 sooooooper ultra wide, after playing battlefield on it all day I can take a nap on it
I've been on console for 6yrs...
Now im on PC master race... it feels amazing..
*1ms 144hz 1440p all the way*
Nope, I prefer IPS for rich colors and for the overall latency of a monitor the display technology is the smallest factor. I agree fully on 1440p 144Hz though.
Shame that there is so few of them at 24 inch. I don't like 27, they are too big for me. I like my screen close while I'm playing.
@@noenken then get va has 1ms and good colors too and the chg70 i have has a response and gtg basically the same as i used both to the tn dell s2716dg
@@PizzaOMC I had a TN before, I know VA panels (yes, good ones ;) ). I still prefer IPS and I can't tell the difference in response time between any of them. btw: your username, I like it.
@@noenken I mean the hz frequency is a matter of view, most games run just fine at 90hz because their engine only updates 60 times (ticks) per second, CS:GO on public servers is the best example with 64tps (64 per second). Minecraft is even "worse" in this case with only 20 ticks per second, so you could play Minecraft on 20hz and you wouldn't be able to spot a real difference to 240hz in that specific title. Most Battlefield 4 Servers run at 30 ticks per second, some at 60, a few on 120 and only a very small amount at the max of 144.
For Example if you'd play Battlefield 4 on 240hz on the best server you won't get a real advantage over 144hz because even if your fps was 240 the Game "only" updates 144 times per Second.
So i think combined in value and performance 144hz Monitors will be King of the Hill for at least 2-3 more Years before 165/180hz Monitors will replace them, until you get real advantages of 240hz at least 5 years will pass by and 288hz will be out then.
What about the MSI MAG241C?
Has a curved display and a VA panel for about the same price as the AOC G2460PF and Viotek GN24C
Bart // Robo true, nobody mentions it, I just bought it 2 weeks ago at micro center for $160 dollars, and this monitor is better than both the AOC and the Viotek, but no youtubers mention it or make a review on that monitor, the colors are good, the design is one of the best
Oh shit! I'm glad I scrolled down to hear about that MSI. Time to google the living shit out of it!
VETTEL 2019 CHAMP
This monitor has extreme ghosting and blurry text
@@rogerfloyd852 That was the older G24C right? This one is newer and shouldn't have that. Also it's just a Samsung panel under the hood.
You're a monitor pro, can we get the occasionally monitor review?
BEST of all for under $100:
LG | 22MK430H-B | 21.5" | Panel IPS | FreeSync | 1920x1080 | 16:9 | 75Hz | 178/178 degrees
Bought it a month ago, cost only 93 bucks (still is).
Best all around(for everyday use and 60-75fps gaming) Monitor for budget users.
Also available for only $20/€20 more (€120)
>22"
no thanks, I' stick with my 27" for now
I just bought that same one. Hows the anti reflective coating on this unit?
Do you notice the difference between 60 and 75hz?
Which 240hz monitor should I buy?
Alienware AW2518H
Asus ROG Swift PG258Q
AOC Agon AG251FZ (without g sync i guess)
Most of these prices have actually gone up sadly.
60Hz Freesync in 4K is always a great choice no matter the price, of the overpriced, I need more frame rate liar's that shill for these expensive over priced rip off monitor's ... Fuck frame Rate's past 60 FPS, I want 4K beautiful Visual's.... All you need is a good TN 4K 32" and up 60Hz HDR monitor for the next 5 to 10 years.. Because even Nvidia is having trouble with That Ripp off 2080TI maintaining 60 fps, so why would anyone try and buy a 144FPs 4K monitor that has NO GRAPHICS'S CARD TO MATCH THAT Fram rate!!!! What a Joke...
32" @ 1440p isn't much better than 27" @ 1080p really....and 27@1080p is crap. No Viotek in Bulgaria. :( 10bit is useless without Quadro/FirePro.
32" @ 1440p is equivalent to 24" @ 1080p, so yeah it IS better than 27" @ 1080p if you consider pixel density. And if you're doing something other than gaming on your PC it's a decent choice.
@@EvilZlo That density, on the big screen, doesn't look so good to me. But maybe I'm just fucked.....Macbook Retina 15 since 2013 and 27" 4K for almost two years now. I visited a friend with a 31.5" 1440p 165hz g-sync to try it out as we were considering a trade for my 4K as he needed cash but found out I'm too used to that awesome pixel density to make the swap and pay for it. I definitely liked the 32" size though, maybe I just need more time with it. Will try again sometime, but I guess I'm not switching until HDR matures, cause then I'll have to buy a new one again when it does...
Tsvetan Tsekov 32 inch is the best with 4K
When i was out looking for a monitor i read a ton of reviews, but i wanted 1440p 144 hz 27 inches, and Dell S2716DG 27" was the one getting the absolute best reviews. I was skeptical because "Oh TN panels are not IPS and their colors suck!" i ended up pulling the trigger anyways because i found a sale for 325$ on it, and boy was it worth it. Fuck everyone who calls TN shit, i literally cannot see the difference between my old IPS and this baller new monitor. But muh viewing angles, i sit infront of it all the time, fuck viewing angles.
Nice video Tim, but next time could you recommend 4k monitor for less then 1,550$ please....
Oh, btw for the price of g-sync you can get brand new RX580...lol
Check out Samsung U32H850 - about half the price, great for gaming and work.
If you want a relatively cheap 4K monitor, go search Amazon for LG 4K IPS monitors. They have a 27" 4K IPS monitor on sale right now for $300. Good luck!
@@LordAlacorn Nice one, i will check that one. Thx
@@selohcin Yeah, i need to check that lg offer as well. 300$ is a very good price imo for an ips panel. Thx
I've had decent luck with my "upstar" 4k monitors (only a sample size of 3 on refurbs, but they were good).
Pros: REAL glass (you can clean nacho cheese off with your fingernails and never worry about scratching them, normal plastic film monitors scratch almost just from looking at them). Real aluminum/glass base (just nicer than the cheap flimsy plastic ones on "gaming" monitors).
Cons: No speakers, no HDMI 2.0 support (I've overclocked the HDMI 1.2 to 55 fps, but just use DP cable like most cards do). Low frequency overclocking headroom (I've only hit 66 Hz on mine, but then again my cables are pretty junk got the door slammed on a few times...). HEAVY! These things are silly heavy, something like 30 pounds! If you're going hiking and carrying monitors, then you might want the flimsy 5 pound ones, but otherwise its no issue if they just sit there.
In all, I think these are much nicer than the Asus 4k monitors my cousins have. They don't look like cheap plastic toys, and they are decently well built. You will need a behemoth for running 4k at Ultra, a single RTX 2080ti just won't cut it. I'm rocking 4x R9 Fury with Threadripper, but if you're doing low/medium settings, then you'll get good frame rates with even an RX 580. I run 3x 4k for workstation/CAD/video editing/etc, and just 1x 4k for games. I had tried using a Titan Xp collectors edition, but that was a joke for High settings! I fully recommend 1440p if you're only gaming, because it looks nice, and it doesn't take a monster to run it 60 fps (plus you get high fps and Hz for the games that can use it!). Hope this helps, cheers!
Viewsonic 24" fhd 1080p tn 144hz freesync gaming monitor $199 2019
What about your viewers that need G Sync? You left us out 🙁
Watch til the end
I scored an Acer 144hz 1080p 24 inch Kg241 TN monitor for $150 at my local Microcenter! Unfortunately I had to return my first one due to a dead pixel, but they replaced it for free. So far so good with the second one. Do you think I got a good deal?
Need to recommend G-Sync and FreeSync monitors for every category, especially considering how much Nvidia dominates the GPU market.
@David Fischermeier haha, just watch until the ene 😉
I don't get the point of gsync. I got a 1440/144 monitor, and it doesn't have gsync, and I never see under 100 FPS and never see tearing. When is gsync useful?
@@circleofsorrow4583 You must just not be sensitive to tearing, because if you're not v-synced (which introduces input lag) or above 144fps on your panel, it's there.
@@Vonliktenstien Oh bud, no. Tearing is less noticeable at a higher refresh rate. Just because "it's there" doesn't mean it's noticeable. Also, FYI, you don't use G-Sync if you're running at 100FPS on a 144Hz monitor, because it wouldn't help a thing.
@@circleofsorrow4583 G-Sync(or Freesync) is more useful on 60Hz monitors, mainly because it's significantly easier to achieve 60FPS than 144FPS lol, but also because tearing is much less noticeable at a higher refresh rate(unless something is really wrong obv). G-Sync works best right below your monitor's refresh rate. So on a 144Hz panel, you'd want to achieve higher than 144FPS, but artificially cap your game at 142/143Hz and then turn G-Sync on. Whether or not that would actually be worth it is going to depend on the game you're playing, and your GPU.
You're not much of a gamer, all I play are FPS games .. tearing is a serious problem and G-Sync solved the problem with nearly no added input lag. Also TN panels today are damn good and this viewing angle phobia is silly considering you're never going to use (ever) the monitor that way.
Can you guys do an episode on the best budget monitors for content creators? Photoshop, lightroom, video editing etc?
This
Samsung U32H850 - VA, true 10 bits, sub 700$.
@@LordAlacorn
Indeed it is 10 bit no dithering, not something generally found in the price bracket.
@@LordAlacorn Thank you!
Acer xf250q monitor 240hz, 1ms response time, 1080p, and built in speakers for $230
Edit: it also has g-sync
*Alienware AW2518HF* is the most beautiful gaming monitor I've ever bought. it's also the fastest 240Hz monitor on the market atm. Even when set at 144Hz it destroys my BenQ XL2411 in terms of input lag.
Is it a TN? How are the colors?
ag251fz beat it long before that came out for less
yes, it's TN but the colors are really really good, 9000x better than my BenQ.
ruclips.net/video/ApOmxORXBJI/видео.html
I bought this and returned it immediately, couldn't go back to the blurry 1080p gaming after gaming at 2560x1440 144hz and 3440x1440x 120hz
@@dewjustin it's meant for competitive gamers who don't care about looks, not people looking for graphical fidelity gaming...
TN panels are trash and makes my eyes hurt! That why I replaced me BenQ 24" 144Hz TN with a Sammy 32" 1440p 144Hz VN panel. i wouldn't use a TN panel if it was mudda FREE!
would of been nice to see this cyber monday lol
No 240hz monitor recommendation? :(
I'll most likely get the xl2546 soon, or some other newer one if they come out
Please stop recommending TN panels. Even the cheapest IPS will make you never want to go back.
144hz IPS is expensive tho, not everyone want to spend extra money there
Unless you actually care about things like motion blur, response time, 240hz
True. But good IPS monitors have 4ms response time (even cheap ones) and 240Hz ... well you made me giggle. Maybe if you plan RTX2080ti in SLI.
My GTX1080 on ultra settings @ 1080p is struggling to deliver 80-85fps in last Tomb Raider title. A 120/144/240hz monitor would be useless here.
I do have a 75Hz, 4ms, 1080p IPS display and it looks stunning. Way better than my old TN, 1ms, 100Hz monitor
Now, a IPS/VA panel at 4ms, 120Hz, 1440p is what I'm looking for next.
@@ares23dc my 4ms IPS was horrible in shooter games, enough that it made my put it to one side as a 2nd monitor even though it cost me 600 :(
There are plenty of good TN panels. I use the PG278Q and without calibration it nailed the whitepoint (6502K is only 2K off), avarage gamma was 2.2 (which is exactly on point) and avarage color deviation (dE) of 1.2 which means you can only see the difference if there is a perfect monitor next to it. Just because most shitty monitors use TN does not mean that TN always sucks. Many people make that mistake.
I just finished my first gaming pc build it has a i7 8700k with a gtx 1080 gpu and need some help choosing a (27 inch) monitor. I'm looking at the ASUS VG278Q 27" Full HD 1080p 144Hz and the Acer XG270HU Red 144HZ WQHD 2K 2560x1440. Would I be able to run a 2K 2560x1440 monitor with the i7 8700k and gtx 1080 gpu? With the money I've got into this build I don't want to chince out with the monitor, is it better and worth it to spend the extra money and get a FULL G-Sync monitor like the ASUS ROG Swift PG278QR 27" 165Hz, Dell Gaming S2716DGR 144Hz?
I still think I want an Acer x34p
I just bought the recently released AOC AGON AG322QC4 31.5'' 1440p 1800R Curved FreeSync 2 (48-144LFC) HDR400 144Hz Gaming Monitor for AU$592 (normally $639)
VA panel and the HDR is at the entry end without local dimming, but in my case that worked in its favour as I wasn't really looking for HDR mainly because of the local dimming halo effect and a good VA SDR @ 3000:1 already looks awesome, this just takes that up a notch.
I was all set to order the AOC CQ32G1 31.5" 144Hz 1440p VA panel with 1ms response time for AU$499, until I looked up just what 1ms MPRT was (Flashing/strobing back lights to simulate 1ms) and rethought that, it also doesn't carry the AGON branding (potentially cheaping out on some components). Maybe Tim could look into MPRT and let us know if it's any good, if he hasn't already and I missed it. Anyway the Agon 2QC4 was just $100 more and technically has all the bells and whistles I need plus bonuses without spending $800-$1000+ (27" too small)
In my mind full HDR1000 won't be great on LCD panels because of the local dimming halo issue and until Oled fix the burn in problem or microled becomes an affordable thing, then HDR 400 as implemented on the 2QC4will suffice me to get my feet wet.
I want to buy a 4k Monitor and downscale newer games to 1080p but I´m reading a lot about blurred scaling. Does someone know if this is this still the case?
That`s true. Picture is blurry and not pleasant to game. When i`m lowering the res. and i want to keep good picture quality i have to choose 1440p
@@hokopl thx good to know. I keep my 1080p Monitor. My RX 570 is not good at 1440p in AAA Games.
For what it's worth, I just set Windows 10 to 150% scaling on my 4K monitor and I've never had a problem. Most apps scale very well or fairly well. Games running at 1080p on my monitor look similar to what they did on my 1080p monitor, although it's worth noting that each manufacturer has different algorithms for interpolation and the like, so your experience may vary depending on which specific monitor you choose. I've had good luck with LG, but you should always read a few reviews of any monitor online before purchasing.
@@SirSilicon
You won't get any downscale blur with a 1080p image on a 4k panel. 4k is exactly 4x the resolution of 1080p, so each pixel just becomes 4 pixels. The reason some resolutions don't scale is because they aren't a multiplication of the other, for example 1440p is around 1.8x the resolution of 1080p, so each pixel at 1080p would take up slightly more than 1 pixel on a 1440p monitor but less than 2, as a result they don't scale properly and you get blur.
I probably haven't described that well, so in simple terms, 1440p on 4k will blur, 1080p on 1440p will blur, but 1080p on 4k won't blur. If this is what you want to do, it will work perfectly fine.
@@dog-jk2hn 1080p on 4K can blur though, it depends how it's being scaled, if 1 to 4 then it shouldn't, but if not then it will, my m9onitor says it supports 1 to 4 pixel mapping but it still looks blurry tbh, no matter what setting or sharpness in Nvidia Control Panel I use, you have to see it for yourself to see what I mean. It works better on console it seems though if using XBOX ONE X on 1080p panel in 4K game
Good job mentioning the samsung cgj5 27" series they have a 32 as well which is awesome and on sale for $349 regularly ! Great work as always !
Been in the 4k master race since November 2014. Would never go back.
Praise be Brother! :)
1440p 144hz better
60fps master race ;p, and 4k is pretty hard to run, even in 2018. 1440p 144hz all the way, maybe in 5 years when gpu's are better and 4k 120/144hz monitors are cheaper than 4k is a better option. But for competitive games 4k is not the best, and even for the average person a 4k monitor is not the most practical.
@@EugeneFifchikus how is it better. Its objectively worse XD
@@Dennell_Mount_and_Blade it's not as hard to run as everyone makes out at all. The games testers and media always run max settings at 4k when you don't need it. Like AA for example is not as helpful as it is at 1080p or 1440p
This guy is off base. It's this simple. 1080p - go 24" to 27"; 2K - 27" to 32" and 4K - 32" and above. For standard viewing distance and available operating systems, you start here. Only then, depending on your budget and research should you make your choice. Right now, I recommend this LG - www.newegg.ca/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100898525%20600417886%20601115272&IsNodeId=1&Description=IPS%20gaming%20monitors&bop=And&Order=PRICE&PageSize=36. There are also 2 4K HDR models at a price of $2600 Canadian; however these are only 27" models. I would wait for a 32" version and the price to go down of course.
In my mind, I always choose the monitor first and then build the PC around it, depending on what your uses will be. In the end what will you be staring at all day; your PC or your monitor???
Like, then watch.
Hey Tim! What's your opinion on the Acer XF0 XF270HUA (the 1440p, 144hz, IPS, Freesync-Version) for about 400€. is the IPS Display worth the extra money compared to your 1440p recommendations (Samsung JG50 ~340€ and Pixio PX329 not available in my region)? Best regards, serubb
I would definitely recommend Samsung C27HG70, it's in the sweet spot for PC gaming: FreeSync (indespensable nowadays), 144 Hz, 27 ", 1440p, good colors, plus you can benefit from HDR (just try FFXV or Far Cry 5 and you'll realize). For a competitive price point: $450.
The Samsung JG50 has washed out colors... PIXO 32" is just a train wreck of quality control and shipping issues along with picture and bleed.. Viotek GN34C 34" suffers from both of the issues mentioned from both previous monitors mentioned. The Acer Predator has backlight bleed on par with much older lower end monitors.. It seems like Monitors lately are just either quality picture or performance lacking, there isn't a single monitor mentioned here that can do or has done both.. EXCEPT...
Buying a monitor is so confusing. I've read most of the comments here and there is literally people trashing VA, TN, IPS, 60hz, 144hz, 240hz, curved screens, 4k, Freesync, and G-sync. Wtf should I buy?
I was leaning towards the Acer Ed347 because it seemed good at under $500 but after reading these comments I am not sure anymore.
I bought the Acer XB271HU 1440P 144Hz and the XB271HK 4K 60Hz from Amazon just to compare them. At the end I see a lot of quality difference in favour of the 4K panel even by simply viewving a 4K youtube video or playing games without absolutely no aliasing and much sharper textures. I returned the 2K 144Hz and 4K 60Hz is on my desk. This is a question of tastes.
Hold on a minute, fake HDR? You mean, entry level HDR. Just becasue your panel cant reach 1000nits, or you dont have a full array backlight, or you have a '9 bit'?panel doesnt make the HDR fake. You still get a HDR signal through the TV, if it was fake HDR you wouldn't get any picture at all from HDR content because the TV cannot decode it. As for quality, even an entry level HDR give you an image calibrated for much higher contrast and backlight so when you put them on full the entire image doesnt get destroyed. If your tv/monitor has good native blacks regardless of a full dynamic backlight, you will still see benefits in much brighter highlights. Just my experience.
Looking for honest answers. I'm searching for a monitor for my Xbox one x and am wondering what 24-27inch monitor I should get. Is freesync worth it? I currently game on tcl p605 which for the price is a pretty damn good TV for gaming, but i need a backup monitor for when my wife wants to watch TV. I also may be getting a computer for the holidays but have no idea if it will be with amd or nvidia (I'm assuming nvidia tho, which further complicates the matter cause than gsync would be preferred). So hypothetically, I have a decent nvidia gpu that can run 1440p over 60fps and an Xbox one x (which I will be playing more), what monitor will maximize my situation?
Refurb S2716DGR for $315 USD at Bestbuy.com, they had new in box for $349.99 last week. It's a TN panel, but plenty of people are fans of the Asus PG278Q right? Best deal on a proper name brand, 27 inch, g-sync, 2560x1440, 144hz, 1ms
I had a G2460P. I bought a much nicer 160Hz VA panel, but it wasn’t better for gaming. I couldn’t figure out why the VA felt less smooth at 160Hz than the TN at 144. It’s because of the VA monitor’s smearing effect. Fast motion makes it look like motion blur is on.
How could you NOT mention the Alienware AW3418DW for $899 on Amazon right now?! I got it for a grand over a year ago and it's still glorious. It's a shame, it has been overlooked by the Hardware Cannucks and many others. Makes me very curious to say the least.
Just pulled the trigger on the Acer Z35P, although I'm keeping my 4K Samsung KS8500. I really hope I'm not disappointed moving from 16:9 4K@60hz HDR 1000+ nits to 21:9 1440p@120hz 300nits. We'll see.
Howdy Guys One quick NOTE that Pixio PX329 Price is off ...the cheapest you will find it here in the States is $399 so not sure where you got $349 even ebay is selling it for $459 its been way OP for Months here, maybe they are showing yall over there its cheaper but it has not been for a while I have been looking to buy one for my son since may and this $399 is the lowest its been they did not even do a Black Friday or cyber Monday sale which it sad to say!~
What is ur opinion on pixio px276h with HDR version monitor price is $319. Or I should buy pixio px276 without HDR price $309. By the way I only play competitive game like DotA 2 and PUBG. Can u pls tell me what should I buy ?
So refreshing (pun not intended) to have realistic recommendations for monitors. Reviewers like Linus seem to appeal to consumers with money to burn so it's always bleeding edge 8K $1000+ stuff. Glad you highlight the fact that 4K still isn't good for the majority of gamers as well as HDR.
Says 4k high refresh rate monitors are prohibitively expensive, and instead recommends a $1500 monitor lol wtf I was expecting something in the $800 range max after that statement... If your ready to spend$1500 I reckon most would just go for the $2000 4k high refresh model instead
I picked up a 34 inch LG 2560 x 1080 144hz free sync. It’s pixel density is much higher than my old 27 inch 1080 p work horse. It’s under $500 now on sale and it’s awesome. Unless your running a 2080 I highly recommended it.
I had 4 144 hz monitors, lg g24mg79, Viewsonic xg2402, BenQ 2411 (if im right) and Samsung cfg73, and Samsung is best for gaming and all around with great contrast colors and so on, TN monitors is awful man
I can recommend the Dell s2417DG, here in Germany it's ~400€ for a 1440p 165hz G Sync Monitor. The only drawback is the fact that it has a Tn panel, but the g sync support at that price is more important for me.
What ever happened to the Pixio PX277? It was a 27" 1440p 144hz IPS monitor for $400 that was released about 4 months ago but they've been out of stock for some time now. Feels like they got rid of it almost instantly
Dell Gaming Monitor S2417DG YNY1D 24-Inch Screen LED-Lit TN with G-SYNC, QHD 2560 x 1440, 165Hz Refresh Rate, 1ms Response Time, 16:9 Aspect Ratio
Its under $380
pushing people to purchase VA monitors seems wrong. As Pual's Hardware and Toms Hardware both say VA panel monitors is on the very Low End of monitors.
They both suggest people to get either a TN or nano-IPS or IPS panel monitor. They both also mentioned that TN panels are for gamers and any IPS panels are for content creators.
I just finished looking at stocks and the sign is the world economy is slowing down. People keep hold of your money, not worth spending money now when in January all tech companies will have a reality check. In a single day 1 trillion dollars of loss for tech companies. Nvidia stock has devalued over $100. This ridiculous pricing has to be corrected.
best price performance for 1440p with g-sync and IPS panel 144 hz and 165 hz OC is the Acer Predator XB271HU. great 27 inch with amazing colors and high pixel count
All these VA panels are garbage at high refresh rates for gaming, they have all kinds of ghosting and weird sharpness problems. IPS or TN is the way to go for high refresh rate gaming. Adaptive refresh technology is not worth the price I agree but I'll gladly pay a 200$ premium for an IPS panel.
Yeah nah. I'll stick with my old ass Benq RL2445. Still outperforms a huge majority of monitors for FPS games and I think they were like $100 on black Friday.
I can't stand VA ghosting, even on the fastest VA's its just so damn noticable to my stupid eagle eyes.
>stupid Eagle eyes
Oxymoron
Someone can find me a good monitor around $200. With Full HD IPS 24" or more 75hz and 5ms response time or less. If someone can I would really appriciate that because i finding for weeks
1440p 60hz 27inch with great color accuracy and latency isnt a real problem: BenQ GW2765HT. Search on internet for best color settings and youll get accurate colors.
1440p 32" EU option?....that pixio looks sweet however not available in our region, same as Viotek :(( sucks to live on this side of the ocean, when it comes to shopping for electronics
It looks like time for some decent and a bit more affordable 4K gaming monitors is still about 2-3 years away, if not further away then that... The industry is moving ahead frustratingly slow!
Just buy acer xb271hu bimprz 1444p + 165 hz + ips + Gsync + 27 inch + 4 ms + with reasonable price .
the background is to blurry. not picking I just like to look around at what reviewers have to show off.
I have a dell u2715h ips (dell top of the line 2015) and a s2716dg tn 144 hz gsync and honesly the tn pannel is not To bad at all after calibratiln. For gaming its a super value
Just wanted to say.. i bought the *Pixio PX329* based on your review AND I AM VERY HAPPY. tyty. this monitor is nearly flawless. very happy
If you want a relatively good value on a g-sync monitor, the Dell S2417dg has treated me well the past year. It regularly goes on sale for 330, which is what I got it for. Ticks a lot of boxes for competitive gaming (I play a lot of Overwatch), but is completely serviceable in AAA titles as well. The one thing is a lot of color banding in dark video but I've never seen it in game.
MSI Optix MAG27CQ for FreeSync people. $330 as well, but it is a better VA panel.
Canadians be really struggling with pc gaming like first its expensive on top the tax makes it's more frustrating
FR BRO
IKR US 500 dollar build is our 1000 build # expensive life
@@ABCD-xg6nr exactly i cant even buy a 2060 without it costing almost 600 when its 350 in US this is straight dumb
@@ABCD-xg6nr my head hurts...sure we have free health care but not like i go to the doctor 24/7 pfft
@@ABCD-xg6nr YOU'RE SO RIGHT
what is your opinion on the 'AOC Agon AG241QX' ? its the cheapest 1440p 144hz monitor where i am staying in europe , its currently seeling for 330 euro .
Currently there is very little options for 1440p ultrawide gsync. The few options are very pricey. Do you think we will get a bunch of new models and price drops?
What's the best monitor for Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 3??
voitek and pixio unavailable for 500million european market, cool beans, bet u can get tsai dan 34' VA 144Hz for 350$ in China
The samsung c27j50 is refresh rate is 144 only if you have an amd grafic card? (I saw someone said it on other review, I wonder if its correct???
What about monitor for single player pc gaming and ps4 pro gaming? Probably something 4k right?
The US is your biggest audience? Oh yea baby!! Time to use inches and ft, MPH, and while you are at it lose the accent!! lol jk :)
hi have you tested the samsung CHG70 27 inch version for response time im looking for a new panel for fast paced competitive gaming one the xbox one X
I picked up the predetor for ips 144 for under 500 few months back I am very happy with it and gsync I think it's a top monitor 1440p is the sweet spot
I wonder if amd repeated what they've done with their cpus with their gpus, would make nvidia do away with g-sync or to make it affordable
I got a lg 29wk600-w for $200 it's a 29in wide screen ips 5ms 53-75hz freesync looks and feels amazing