to be honest, thorium actually has to wear uranium's clothes (breed thorium-232 to uranium-233) before he can get the party started and have a couple shots of plutonium, of course but at least when he gets wasted, thorium (which at this time is already wearing uranium's clothes) goes home full with chips instead (aka uranium-232, which absorbs neutrons instead).
For anyone wondering why thorium hasn’t always been used, the US decided to research and develop Uranium reactors mainly because they are easier for Nuclear bombs and if they were using and researching uranium for nukes it would be easier to use uranium reactors rather than thorium reactors. If you were looking for reasons to get rid of nukes, a more efficient energy source is a reason.
There are also a lot of laws/regulations that indirectly target Thorium reactors, primarily through draconian licensing measures against liquid fuel nuclear reactors vs solid fuel. And those are there because Big Oil owns the American political system, and is very interested in staying in business and not being out-moded by what is a vastly cleaner and more efficient power source.
Ah yes the bs story of thorium being a more efficient fuel source, except youd have to irradiated the thorium with uranium to make it work in the first place. You're whole theory is dumb.
As someone who worked on a nuclear reactor you did pretty good on your info, the only thing I will say is that relative to what people think, nuclear power plants make WAY less waste than you actually think, and at least within the navy, there are practices put in place to attempt to minimize nuclear waste generation just because its such a hassle to deal with.
@@nickmickky2714 Simply put, it hasn't had as much research done on it yet. Where as we started making typical uranium reactors for nuclear bombs(as it produces weapons grade plutonium) thorium hasn't been looked at much until recently, due to climate issues so many countries are researching it more. China is actually about to start up its first Thorium reactor soon though!
I agree with you. But normal reactors still produce a ton of waste comparatively. Including the highly dangerous plutonium. Where as thorium makes much less waste and the waste it does produce has close to 10,000 times shorter half-life. Not to mention that it can literally eat plutonium and other nuclear byproducts for fuel. Thereby reducing even more waste that has been accumulated.
You forgot the most important part: Uranium is named after Uranus, a name that gets constantly ridiculed by schoolchildren; Thorium was named after Thor, the badass lightning god.
After deeply thinking on this subject of whether Thorium reactors are possible, I have concluded that pushing some cripples is the best we can do as a collective.
@@covekkojipostoji131 While there is consensus that a total of approximately 30 men died from immediate blast trauma and acute radiation syndrome (ARS) in the seconds to months after the disaster, respectively, with 60 in total in the decades hence, inclusive of later radiation induced cancer,[2][3][4] there is considerable debate concerning the accurate number of projected deaths due to the disaster's long-term health effects, with long-term death estimates ranging from up to 4,000 (per the 2005 and 2006 conclusions of a joint consortium of the United Nations) for the most exposed people of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia), to 16,000 in total for all those exposed on the entire continent of Europe, with figures as high as 60,000 when including the relatively minor effects around the globe.[5] we aren't talking about immediate deaths but instead overall. Also why are defending uranium so much? What is it that grinds your gear about thorium?
You are thinking about it wrong. This means we have to waste less of the fun stuff on powering the world and can put more of it to fun Japanese fireworks displays.
I had an 45 min long presentation about the advantages of nuclear power over fossil fuels like coal or oil that my country (Germany) so heavily relies on, while hating nuclear power. Turns out all my co students had to say:" so you are a slave of nuclear power lobby or what?" And "but how do you personally stand on the matter" or why I didn't speak more negative about it. My whole presentation and scientific research paper was about how public misconceptions exist and what hard facts actually show us. That seemed to have went straight over there head I guess😂
and they were warned by Trump to not become vulnerable and then they became Russia's bitch. Took Poland and the rest of the Baltic states to get Germany on board to help Ukraine bc Germany fucked themselves switching too fast.
Germany, of all countries, should know more about nuclear power you wankers are the most efficient people on the face of this earth but you'd rather burn coal over having the cleanest, safest form of energy because you're too stupid or something
@@mariocortez8853no it's not, if the following things are true: 1) Nuclear Power is more expensive than renewables, if you factor in the whole life cycle and that proper waste disposable isn't solved yet 2) It would take Germany >15 years to build new reactors, so that's way too late for our climate goals, so again, betting on the wrong horse (since we are very behind our climate targets and need sth that helps fast) 3) Nuclear accidents are still a thing even with a Thorium + Plutonium Mix 4) since Germany switched off its last nuclear plants, we are still on average exporting energy, so apparently our economy doesn't need it, and it is not the reason behind our high energy prices But maybe giese39 can enlighten us, wether some of those are misconceptions.
I used this for a science project on why thorium kicked ass. I got a 100 plus extra credit for determining sources and making facts that could actually be used in the unit after that project.
my grandad works on nuclear plants using thorium and they work really well. a couple towns in indonesia currently run off a single one built by that company
You have one of those teachers that plays a youtube video that opens you to a new channel that you love i had a English teacher that put on oversimplified ww 1 because we were reading war horse
@@sushantsharma5441though, they ain't wrong There is radiation coming off our phone The problem is the intensity, which is not very intense on our phone
@@RandomFurry07Also the frequncy. No matter how much radiation is coming from your phone it isnt going to have the same effect as the radiation from uranium. The radiation from your phone is non-ionising so it has no effect on your body (exept for some very slight heating).
That was actually one of the reasons the US went after uranian and plutonium for nuclear reactor over thorium: the waste and byproducts from U-235/238 reactors could be used in bombs, helping reduce the cost of nuclear weapons. The US knew before they went with uranium for reactors that thorium was way safer, cheaper and more efficient: politics ruined everything, as usual.
“Powerful clean reliable. And if things go wrong at the end of the day you can still kick it’s ass” that’s it. That’s how the founders envisioned America.
I love how in the tags instead of putting tags like Thorium or nuclear accidents, he puts tags like adhd, jaegar bombs, ben and jerrys and kendrick lamar.
Eh I feel like the experience would be better if you just did a calamity playthrough then a thorium playthrough, both are great but the calamity items just steamroll most if not all of the thorium content making it kinda useless
DUDE I was wondering why this video was showing up in my recommendations again. I was just looking up a bunch of Terraria vs. Starbound comparison videos, because I'm thinking about getting into one, and I happen to own both. Wild how interconnected things are nowadays.
@@WhompingWalrus wait terraria is about to have a massive update with alot of content plus its amazing modded or not all you need to know is you can get a fart in a jar
I watched this last night and my roommate put on Skinwalker Ranch today. So many of their phenomenons are explained here. Just wanted to say thanks for the education and the show is hilarious now.
There is one major inaccuracy in this video: thorium, as you said, is fertile and has to be turned into *Uranium-233* by running it through a nuclear reactor before it can be used as fuel. So 1. You're turning the thorium into an isotope of uranium in order to get power out of it, and 2. Uranium-233 can and has been used to make nuclear weapons.
Also you can make last even longer with a thermian shell. Causes the neutron particles to bounce back at the cell giving them a chance to merge with another molecule that has lost one of it neutrons.
HeathenGeek whole reason it wasn't used was because it couldn't be used in nukes. Making uranium reactors allowed us to make nukes and energy. So you're killing two birds with one nuclear Holocaust. By the time we stopped making so many nukes we also had stopped building nuclear reactors and scare tactics from environmental lobbying groups had made the public fearful of nuclear energy Thorium is our only fiesable solution to get away from fossil fuels. Everything else is a pipe dream and no matter how much money you pour into renewables like solar they can only shave off a fraction of our energy needs Cleaner nuclear energy that can't be weaponized. Funny it's not fuel companies preventing it it's environmentalists. Guess if it took off they wouldn't have the government throwing hundreds of billions at their failing businesses
Side note Thorium reactors require a lot more work and precision when it comes to the manufacturing of the rods needed. Sure, the energy benefits are enormous, but you need to be careful otherwise you will get a harmful gamma ray burst.
You’re getting there, remember to take care of yourself too though, that means daily walks, good hydration, good food, and no matter what your boss says, even people like thorium have off days and need a break sometimes. I believe in you
Thorium is currently living a successful life as a lawyer and has a wife, 3 kids, house with a white picket fence, and a golden retriever named buddy. He volunteers at the local soup kitchen every weekend, goes to church, and is paying for his kids to go to college. Edit: thank you guys for my best comment on RUclips
I'm not 100% certain, so don't quote me on this: So yeah, that is the reason why everyone used uranium as nuclear fuel back in the atomic age, as basically everybody and their mother tried to get their hands on nuclear weapons. The reason we're not (yet) using thorium en masse, is because the existing reactors need to be altered pretty drastically to accommodate use of thorium rather than uranium. I don't think we've quite perfected the technology, but we're working on it. Practically every country has agreed we don't really want to use nuclear weapons (looking at you, North Korea), so the world is actually actively working toward transitioning to using thorium only
I love the environment and Thorium is definitely the way to go. Solar panels are cool and all but they have to have batteries and all that fancy stuff where as nuclear can just keep going along with the fac that it is much more efficient and cheaper.
Otto von Hammersmark Im an ethical thinker in regards to the environment and I agree fourth generation nuclear power such as thorium molten salt reactors and sodium-cooled fast reactors are the way to go, for clean plentiful energy.
The thing is, Thorium isn't new. When nuclear reactor was first introduced Uranium was chosen precisely because it's by-product is essential to nuclear weapon. Back then where coal and oil are still the major source of energy the purpose of nuclear plant really was just needed to help making bombs.
Correct! During the development of the nuclear reactor, Alvin Weinberg had a Torium reactor running for roughly 15,000 hours from 1965 to 1969. But the US discontinued this research because they settled on uranium. What a gigantic mistake.... Imagine if they didn't, the US would now be the world wide supplier of cheap, clean reliable energy.
China is the only country right now developing Thorium reactors. Apparently the reason I read that no other country does it is because since the technology is so different from traditional nuclear reactors that the regulatory agencies don't know how to regulate new plants and say that they are safe. I have no idea how true or not that is, but props to China for developing one of the most promising power sources on earth. Last I read they are making a mini LFTR and if it is successful they will scale up the size through a few generations until they have a full size plant.
China have now put MSRs on the backburner and for thorium based cycles are instead focusing on a solid fueled pebble bed thorium reactor similar to India's reactors which won't even be finished until 2024 (bare in mind this will be a prototype reactor). It looks like they intend to continue work on the MSR experiment after that period so its presented itself a good opportunity for a western country to look into the technology in the meantime and begin working on a modern day MSRe before expanding upon the program. The MSRe built by oakridge national laboratories was the second ever (the first being the atomic plane prototype reactor that was scraped after ICBMs became viable) and the first true MSR. They built it from near scratch in only 5 years after which it was critical for another 4 years without fault, this was done on 80 million USD of funding (adjusted for inflation) with construction beginning in 1960.
Nuclear energy will never work, it doesn't have the votes in congress to pass. Democrats are not on board with nuclear energy and Republicans are not much better.
@@literallytheunitedstatesof1842 Yeah because no one wants to make something that would be objectively superior than the current thing. Everyone is baaaaad
India's entire nuclear energy program is geared towards producing nuclear energy from Thorium instead of Uranium. The only big issue is, as Sam mentioned, Plutonium. That's why current gen 'Fast Breeder' reactors are being developed, so that they can make enough Plutonium out of the conventional Uranium reactions. And as far as I have seen, India is the only country that is taking Thorium based nuclear energy seriously. It's really a fascinating thing to read about.
@@kl6544 Well, it's atleast relevant to the subject matter of the video. As far as I know, only India's nuclear program focuses on developing methods to extract energy from thorium on a commercial scale. Most of the other programs are either being defunded or reliant on traditional sources like Uranium.
Me with ADHD seeing the part about ADHD kids: never before have I been so offended by something I, 100 percent agree with also, Sam has very good points, shit like this is super interesting, i would recommend looking into nuclear reactors and how they work, basically they use the heat from the radioactive element to heat massive steam turbines
I have presented this video in multiple consultations with energy holding groups... suffice to say that none have made a switch but one power plant changed it's front door locks so I can't keep going back talking about Thorium
This video is retarded, that's why. Thorium is a precursor decay product to Radium, the largest producer of radon gas. Bust out a chart of nuclides. 238 can be fed to breeder reactors, enrichment is only necessary to make weapons or special reactors. Thorium needs to be bred into Uranium 234, which has a virtually identical fission yield coefficient to 235. It produces the same nuclear waste.
@@chadthundercock7897 I'm pretty sure thorium has to be combined with plutonium and not uranium. Plus. Thorium does more work and is more efficient then uranium.
@@chadthundercock7897 There are currently 7 research reactors that use Thorium and they all use *Plutonium* to kick off the reaction just like the videos states. Takes about 10 seconds to google search that to prove you're wrong and the video right.
Even 3 Mile Island wasn't something to worry about. Kyle Hill's video is a great documentary about its effects, but really it released virtually no significant radiation.
@@user-ei6qn1db7b Go to TMI? I may not remember exactly, but during the incident, the outside of the building recorded radiation levels on the same level as regular coal power plants do on the daily due to C-13. The increase in expected cancer cases due to fission product release to the environment is 0.5 people. A flip of the coin if even one nearby person ended up developing cancer due to that event, which is a lower risk than secondhand smoke.
Cold War-era governments (including ours) backed uranium-based reactors because they produced plutonium - handy for making nuclear weapons. And now its very expensive to switch to thorium. That's why most nuclear power plants use uranium for those of you wondering.
Worth noting when you watch this video- Democrats in congress hate nuclear energy including AOC and Bernie Sanders. Republicans on the other hand support nuclear energy pretty universally, with close to 70% of the Republican base supporting nuclear energy and basically all Republican elected officials believing the same. If you actually support nuclear energy you should ask people like AOC and Bernie Sanders why they don't, and put pressure on them to support nuclear. Nuclear energy can't be used if Republicans are the only ones supporting it, it won't have the votes to pass.
Honestly, if school teachers taught classes like this it would probably lead to an increase in grades, student productivity and kids actually wanting to go to school. It's entertaining and educational.
Mr. Scarecrow I doubt it. While an entertaining teacher can definitely make someone care about something, to an extent at least, it is not only unreasonable and impractical to have every class be taught in this style, but I don't think the teacher is usually the main reason students aren't engaged in school. Also, RUclips education misses the reinforcement stage of learning, so ultimately, not much would really change even if a teacher was like Sam O'Nella. Basically, don't compare a RUclips video to school and the engagement of the student isn't solely (or even mainly) on the teacher.
It's more a primer than educational. It mentions conclusions without any details at all as if people were completely dumb. But if it helps get the thinking caps on... why not.
I’d never thought I would use this information.. but turns out.. I have to write an essay on Thorium.. thanks Sam for being there before I knew I needed you
You want to know the saddest part that Nella forgot to mention? The reason we don't have these plants is not because its too advanced for us, but because nobody wants to spend the money. Imagine that, the next generation of fuel and energy sitting right there for anyone to take but they would rather burn all the oil in the world first.
@@thebiggestcheems Not so much capitalism as politically fueled corporations. Do you think Uranium would be given the time of day if governments didn't buy the stuff for weapons? The government is far more to blame than is the free market.
@@thebiggestcheems Depends. Free market economics is fine. But the "capitalism" we have today is not free market economics by any stretch of the word. So if we were to discard current day economics, I'd be fine with it, as long as it was replaced with less governmental intervention. As it stands, the majority of corporations can exist solely because of the government. Sometimes it is because corporations manipulate the government. Sometimes it is because the government invests itself into corporations through bailouts, subsidies, tax breaks, etc. Most business in a free market would take place on a much smaller scale. Most being local or at most regional. The few that did become international would do so through sheer efficiency, and even then they couldn't stomp out competition as unfairly as corporations do currently.
My name is Thorium. I’m 33 years old. My house is in the northeast section of Morioh, where all the villas are, and I am not married. I work as an employee for the Kame Yu department stores, and I get home every day by 8 PM at the latest. I don’t smoke, but I occasionally drink. I’m in bed by 11 PM, and make sure I get eight hours of sleep, no matter what. After having a glass of warm milk and doing about twenty minutes of stretches before going to bed, I usually have no problems sleeping until morning. Just like a baby, I wake up without any fatigue or stress in the morning. I was told there were no issues at my last check-up. I’m trying to explain that I’m a person who wishes to live a very quiet life. I take care not to trouble myself with any enemies, like winning and losing, that would cause me to lose sleep at night. That is how I deal with society, and I know that is what brings me happiness. Although, if I were to fight I wouldn’t lose to anyone.
Alternate title “Sam shits on uranium for 4 and a half minutes”
+3 seconds
unoriginal name or i read my finals writing test out to you
@@Mars_555. -1
saba chixradze +1
@@somerguy3527 -1
Thorium isn't crippled, he just needs a hype man.
thorium isnt the kind to party without anything, he needs a couple of shots to get him going.
to be honest, thorium actually has to wear uranium's clothes (breed thorium-232 to uranium-233) before he can get the party started
and have a couple shots of plutonium, of course
but at least when he gets wasted, thorium (which at this time is already wearing uranium's clothes) goes home full with chips instead (aka uranium-232, which absorbs neutrons instead).
Yeah, Thorium's just an introvert.
Wraith5k i love this
J
For anyone wondering why thorium hasn’t always been used, the US decided to research and develop Uranium reactors mainly because they are easier for Nuclear bombs and if they were using and researching uranium for nukes it would be easier to use uranium reactors rather than thorium reactors. If you were looking for reasons to get rid of nukes, a more efficient energy source is a reason.
There are also a lot of laws/regulations that indirectly target Thorium reactors, primarily through draconian licensing measures against liquid fuel nuclear reactors vs solid fuel. And those are there because Big Oil owns the American political system, and is very interested in staying in business and not being out-moded by what is a vastly cleaner and more efficient power source.
@@Raptorman0205 yup ☹️
We're not getting rid of nukes buddy, looking for a reason to is pointless.
Ah yes the bs story of thorium being a more efficient fuel source, except youd have to irradiated the thorium with uranium to make it work in the first place. You're whole theory is dumb.
@@phillipjohnson5739 Holy pessimism batman!
As someone who worked on a nuclear reactor you did pretty good on your info, the only thing I will say is that relative to what people think, nuclear power plants make WAY less waste than you actually think, and at least within the navy, there are practices put in place to attempt to minimize nuclear waste generation just because its such a hassle to deal with.
Thank You For This Information Tsumagi
why arent more reactors using Thorium (I know little about physics)
It really isn't even that hard to deal with. They go to an old salt mine or whatever, stick it in there, and guard it. Eventually they seal it up.
@@nickmickky2714 Simply put, it hasn't had as much research done on it yet. Where as we started making typical uranium reactors for nuclear bombs(as it produces weapons grade plutonium) thorium hasn't been looked at much until recently, due to climate issues so many countries are researching it more. China is actually about to start up its first Thorium reactor soon though!
I agree with you. But normal reactors still produce a ton of waste comparatively. Including the highly dangerous plutonium. Where as thorium makes much less waste and the waste it does produce has close to 10,000 times shorter half-life. Not to mention that it can literally eat plutonium and other nuclear byproducts for fuel. Thereby reducing even more waste that has been accumulated.
Sam O'nella: * Makes Video about why thorium is better than uranium *
Uranium: "Okay, BUT CAN YOU DO T H I S!"
* levels an entire city *
;D ;D Pewdiepie reference right there
Zuzana Klinovská No, that is not a pewdiepie reference.
@@augmentedfourthssuperfan7297 sure...
Plutonium : bitch do you even lift
@@aneesh2115 No.
You forgot the most important part: Uranium is named after Uranus, a name that gets constantly ridiculed by schoolchildren; Thorium was named after Thor, the badass lightning god.
Nice
Thats great
actually, uranus was named after uranium
Edit: Ok got it i'm stupid, you can stop replying now
@@Zereze no uranus the planet is named afrer a roman god like every other planet in our solar system except earth
@@goomba-dp3fb That’s because when the planets were being named, earth wasn’t considered a planet.
After deeply thinking on this subject of whether Thorium reactors are possible, I have concluded that pushing some cripples is the best we can do as a collective.
Finally, my deep love of pushing cripples can be productive...
237 likes damn
Ill meet you at the stairs ;)
Fun fact, lots of vintage Camera lenses get a yellow tint over the years due to the Thorium coatings
so that means movie mexico is full of thorium
actually yes
Lmao
Also, waste from thorium reactors is safe after just 300 years, instead of 100K.
@ⴰⵙⴰⴼⴰⵕ ⵏⴰⵔⴰⵖⴰⵙ Well, it depends on the definition of safe. I think 350 years is essentially down to background radiation.
Thats 100 years
@@covekkojipostoji131 While there is consensus that a total of approximately 30 men died from immediate blast trauma and acute radiation syndrome (ARS) in the seconds to months after the disaster, respectively, with 60 in total in the decades hence, inclusive of later radiation induced cancer,[2][3][4] there is considerable debate concerning the accurate number of projected deaths due to the disaster's long-term health effects, with long-term death estimates ranging from up to 4,000 (per the 2005 and 2006 conclusions of a joint consortium of the United Nations) for the most exposed people of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia), to 16,000 in total for all those exposed on the entire continent of Europe, with figures as high as 60,000 when including the relatively minor effects around the globe.[5] we aren't talking about immediate deaths but instead overall. Also why are defending uranium so much? What is it that grinds your gear about thorium?
100k years wat da fawg
AAAAAAOOOO
"So this is amazing for creating energy"
"But can it kill people?"
"Uh no"
"Well get out of my sight."
circa the 60s I think
@@rushcap2761 circa now too
You are thinking about it wrong. This means we have to waste less of the fun stuff on powering the world and can put more of it to fun Japanese fireworks displays.
@@charper9890 YOU ARE A FUCKING GENIUS
I'm not even sure what you're trying to make fun of
I had an 45 min long presentation about the advantages of nuclear power over fossil fuels like coal or oil that my country (Germany) so heavily relies on, while hating nuclear power. Turns out all my co students had to say:" so you are a slave of nuclear power lobby or what?" And "but how do you personally stand on the matter" or why I didn't speak more negative about it. My whole presentation and scientific research paper was about how public misconceptions exist and what hard facts actually show us. That seemed to have went straight over there head I guess😂
and they were warned by Trump to not become vulnerable and then they became Russia's bitch. Took Poland and the rest of the Baltic states to get Germany on board to help Ukraine bc Germany fucked themselves switching too fast.
Germany, of all countries, should know more about nuclear power
you wankers are the most efficient people on the face of this earth but you'd rather burn coal over having the cleanest, safest form of energy because you're too stupid or something
Same
It's a shame that Germany, one of the largest economic powerhouses (known for their engineering) aren't taking advantage of nuclear energy
@@mariocortez8853no it's not, if the following things are true:
1) Nuclear Power is more expensive than renewables, if you factor in the whole life cycle and that proper waste disposable isn't solved yet
2) It would take Germany >15 years to build new reactors, so that's way too late for our climate goals, so again, betting on the wrong horse (since we are very behind our climate targets and need sth that helps fast)
3) Nuclear accidents are still a thing even with a Thorium + Plutonium Mix
4) since Germany switched off its last nuclear plants, we are still on average exporting energy, so apparently our economy doesn't need it, and it is not the reason behind our high energy prices
But maybe giese39 can enlighten us, wether some of those are misconceptions.
I used this for a science project on why thorium kicked ass. I got a 100 plus extra credit for determining sources and making facts that could actually be used in the unit after that project.
nice
Me: Can we get some Thorium?
Mom: We have Thorium at home.
Thorium at home: Uranium.
Other way around but okay
@@AverageAlien no
@@jimbojones1848 yes
@@AverageAlien negative
@@jimbojones1848 positive
God, I sure do wish that I could release deadly radon gas when I didn’t want to wake up
I already can release deadly gases in the morning, though the radon would be a nice addition
Anything is possible if you just don't shower long enough
*Geiger meter sounds* I don't wanna get up mom *Geiger meter sounds intensify*
I do, it's a good pastime
a good-sized rock tends to do the trick
Literally the fucking magical alien power-source type rock in sci-fi, only instead of being rare, it’s *more common* than competitors.
my grandad works on nuclear plants using thorium and they work really well. a couple towns in indonesia currently run off a single one built by that company
I remember my chemistry teacher showing this video in class.
This was how I was introduced to Sam O'Nella.
i want your chemistry teacher, mine is just an old boring dude lmfao
your teacher is awesome
@NPC 420 ???????????
Go back to reddit dumbass
@Alex reddit moment
You have one of those teachers that plays a youtube video that opens you to a new channel that you love i had a English teacher that put on oversimplified ww 1 because we were reading war horse
i knew i made the right choice buying $2000 worth of Thorium from that alley guy, thanks Sam-O-Nella
Which alley? That guy who hangs out between Fairfax and Main is selling some bunk shit, so check your supply for quality for sure.
Apparently $2000 of Thorium (purre Thorium) has enough energy to power every aspect of human life for a person for 2000 years. Pretty neat.
@@jacobjackson8155 So, $50 worth of Thoriums would cover me for basically the rest of my life? DEAL. Who's holding?
@@jacobjackson8155 that is why if it ever going to be used as a main energy source it will costs a million times more. because "economy"
why did you get 10^-27 grams of thorium
It really bothers me just how much fear there still is about nuclear power. Most people don't even understand what radiation is and how it works.
Reminds me of the time my parents warned me about "radiation" from my phone
Also uh
The reasons why Chernobyl and Fukushima got into those circumstances
There's also how nuclear waste gets disposed
@@sushantsharma5441though, they ain't wrong
There is radiation coming off our phone
The problem is the intensity, which is not very intense on our phone
You're surprised by this? People are pretty stupud.
@@RandomFurry07Also the frequncy. No matter how much radiation is coming from your phone it isnt going to have the same effect as the radiation from uranium. The radiation from your phone is non-ionising so it has no effect on your body (exept for some very slight heating).
My teacher downloaded this, edited it and played it to the class. Good day
How'd they edit it? Remove some of the raunchier parts of it?
@@concept5631 yeah pretty much
Me: "Then why aren't we using it?"
Sam: "It can't be turned into a weapon."
Me: "Ah okay, that explains it."
Yes
But this does not explain it not being used to replace thorium
@@catinamask5019 What? Replace Thorium?
@@Halfendymion replace uranium
That was actually one of the reasons the US went after uranian and plutonium for nuclear reactor over thorium: the waste and byproducts from U-235/238 reactors could be used in bombs, helping reduce the cost of nuclear weapons. The US knew before they went with uranium for reactors that thorium was way safer, cheaper and more efficient: politics ruined everything, as usual.
“Powerful clean reliable. And if things go wrong at the end of the day you can still kick it’s ass” that’s it. That’s how the founders envisioned America.
THATS RIGHT! WE HAVE TO MAKE AMERIKA GREAT AGAIN LETS GO KICK THE GOVERNMENTS ASS; WHERES THE BATF AT?
'Murica!
'Murica!
I mean, you’re kindof spot on
*cough cough* first ‘nd second amendments *cough cough*
the "most replayed" graph thing perfectly points out where exactly the weird frame is
after 6 years this is still the first result for the search term "thorium"
lol
Instructions unclear, Accidentally burned poor cripple
Yes... "accidentally".
_instruction nuclear,my reactor turn into chernobyl_
hold on, so we weren't supposed to do that? crap
The ingredients were in very small print
Wait that was bad? I ended up turning Iraq into a nuclear fall out area
I love how in the tags instead of putting tags like Thorium or nuclear accidents, he puts tags like adhd, jaegar bombs, ben and jerrys and kendrick lamar.
That's Sam for you
where can you see the tags
@@FullKnight51 ok thx
What can we say, he knows his audience.
hes different
SEVEN YEARS THIS HAS BEEN OUT, I HAVE REWATCHED THIS VIDEO MORE THAN 5 TIMES, AND ONLY TODAY DID I NOTICE THE PUN IN THE TITLE
Since Sam has returned I'm returning to all his vids and they're just as good as I remember
Thorium is one of the best mods, especially paired with Calamity
Eh I feel like the experience would be better if you just did a calamity playthrough then a thorium playthrough, both are great but the calamity items just steamroll most if not all of the thorium content making it kinda useless
@Colin Slivinski pp
DUDE I was wondering why this video was showing up in my recommendations again. I was just looking up a bunch of Terraria vs. Starbound comparison videos, because I'm thinking about getting into one, and I happen to own both.
Wild how interconnected things are nowadays.
@@WhompingWalrus wait terraria is about to have a massive update with alot of content
plus its amazing modded or not
all you need to know is you can get a fart in a jar
@@muffin8786 i mean there is a mod which among other things buffs thorium weapons to be more suited for calamity
As a kid with ADHD I can relate to uranium on a deep and personal level.
Grim The Ghastly Are you also a cancerous pain in the ass?
@@0816M3RC when I want to be, yes.
You level cities??
@@0816M3RC Hah, getting salty over just a kid saying that he has ADHD. Glad that humanity has evolved
Cat Getting salty over a joke.. yes humanity has "evolved".
I just used this video as one of the sources for an environmental science paper I had to write lmao
I watched this last night and my roommate put on Skinwalker Ranch today. So many of their phenomenons are explained here. Just wanted to say thanks for the education and the show is hilarious now.
Earlier was confused wether to buy uranium or thorium now will definitely go for thorium!
for what?
@@Oxygen1004 not making bombs, obviously
Don't forget the plutonium
@@Oxygen1004 You know... ‘-‘ ... s t u f f.
Hol up
US government and Russian government:
“Give me the Uranium.”
*Presents Thorium*
“No! I don’t want that!”
Hungry Pumpkin approves!
Spy Jon Sachurin I hate that I understand this fucking joke
DC Biscuit me to
Give me the Tesseract
"i'm very hungry"
Mr. Krabs sold Spongebob's soul for 62 cents.
Abomidable
There is one major inaccuracy in this video: thorium, as you said, is fertile and has to be turned into *Uranium-233* by running it through a nuclear reactor before it can be used as fuel. So 1. You're turning the thorium into an isotope of uranium in order to get power out of it, and 2. Uranium-233 can and has been used to make nuclear weapons.
an isotope changes the neutron amount to change the material they would have to change the protons
Thorium and uranium are both elements. You can't change one element into another. If you could, that would literally be alchemy.
You know the radiation is bad when wolverine has 4 claws
I think that's actually Lady Deathstrike
@@mylifeisacomplexpastiche7901 it even changed his identify! Jeez!
666 like
“lets start with mining”
No, you have to start with punching trees.
Wood armor
leaves house
This comment reply chain is cursed
stone armor
Bedrock half slabs
Also you can make last even longer with a thermian shell. Causes the neutron particles to bounce back at the cell giving them a chance to merge with another molecule that has lost one of it neutrons.
Sending this to my state representatives
i used this as a source for my chemistry hw and got max points, thanks Sam for saving my academical life and my ha ha funny life as well
👍👍👍
My ha ha funny life
He is haha funny man
E
I hope you have 15 or less otherwise your education system sucks.
At last, a video the politicians can understand.
your expecting too much of you're typical tenured politician
lefu come on. You used the correct form of "too" but not "your?" I'm disappointed
HeathenGeek whole reason it wasn't used was because it couldn't be used in nukes. Making uranium reactors allowed us to make nukes and energy. So you're killing two birds with one nuclear Holocaust. By the time we stopped making so many nukes we also had stopped building nuclear reactors and scare tactics from environmental lobbying groups had made the public fearful of nuclear energy
Thorium is our only fiesable solution to get away from fossil fuels. Everything else is a pipe dream and no matter how much money you pour into renewables like solar they can only shave off a fraction of our energy needs
Cleaner nuclear energy that can't be weaponized. Funny it's not fuel companies preventing it it's environmentalists. Guess if it took off they wouldn't have the government throwing hundreds of billions at their failing businesses
Stopreadingmyusername 100% acuarate my friend.
There's no fat envelope of cash attached to this video that a lobbyist can use to make a politician understand.
crazy how entertaining and informative this is. sam is the best teacher ngl
Side note
Thorium reactors require a lot more work and precision when it comes to the manufacturing of the rods needed. Sure, the energy benefits are enormous, but you need to be careful otherwise you will get a harmful gamma ray burst.
Source?
We nEE d further education on this subject
I've tried 4 years to be thorium. And I'm still uranium.
I KNEW I WASN'T THE ONLY ONE TO KILL PEOPLE WHO WAKE ME UP WITH CHEMICAL WEAPONS
@@juniperrodley9843 sometimes. It do be like dat 🙂
You’re getting there, remember to take care of yourself too though, that means daily walks, good hydration, good food, and no matter what your boss says, even people like thorium have off days and need a break sometimes. I believe in you
@@thevoiceinyourhead7215 couldn't have said it better myself
@@juniperrodley9843 because it's the voice in your head
Thorium is currently living a successful life as a lawyer and has a wife, 3 kids, house with a white picket fence, and a golden retriever named buddy. He volunteers at the local soup kitchen every weekend, goes to church, and is paying for his kids to go to college.
Edit: thank you guys for my best comment on RUclips
is he boring or what?
@@viljamiritvanen2709 sometimes successful means boring
Little does he know uranium is at his door
@@SourShrimp successful at what? Being boring?
Who is uranium then？
I legit used this for a presentation on my college level English class and I got an a
Thank you for giving me inspiration for a school paper a couple years ago! Just revisited this video~
Me: reads title as "Why Thorium sucks"
me: is confused for 4 minutes and 32 seconds.
*Dyslexia 100*
Same dude
3:51
noob
No because without this comment, I would’ve done the same thing too
Sam O’Nella: says Iran *once*
RUclips recommendations: Everyone Needs To See This
I’m here from a playlist with all his videos
I'm here watching re-runs because I love this channel. Are you seriously telling me that Sammy was trending? If so that's fucking cool :)
@@xxswagmastermike_7kxx568 >generic template label
>dank
lolno
Eat your cereal
>youtube recommendations
>bad
>nobody:
>bad
>yes
>bad
>2020 anyone?
>bad
This is my first experience with this channel and i am gonna click on every video of your's.
how did this guy from years ago teach me more about Thorium in 4 minutes than a video from a few months ago that is 23:46 in length
Bonus points for having “Thor” in the name.
Yeah I guess, but it’s not actually meant to be pronounced the same,
Thor = tor
Thorium = Thorium
Thorium was named after Thor. Similar to polonium named after Poland and many other elements.
Carcinogenic Thalidomide Dang, didn’t know that. That’s one hell of a fun fact.
@@user-pm1gb2eo1s you can thank the internet.
Dude I almost liked this comment though look at the like number
*watching video*
"Thorium is so much better than uranium, why don't the Americans use it as nuclear fuel?"
3:51 "oooh that's why"
@Oscar Hill no
It is actually the reason why we use Uranium instead of Thorium.
@@RusskiBlusski i know, and that's fucked
I'm not 100% certain, so don't quote me on this:
So yeah, that is the reason why everyone used uranium as nuclear fuel back in the atomic age, as basically everybody and their mother tried to get their hands on nuclear weapons. The reason we're not (yet) using thorium en masse, is because the existing reactors need to be altered pretty drastically to accommodate use of thorium rather than uranium. I don't think we've quite perfected the technology, but we're working on it.
Practically every country has agreed we don't really want to use nuclear weapons (looking at you, North Korea), so the world is actually actively working toward transitioning to using thorium only
@@comradebrainnuker7321 pretty sure the reason is still the same. The transition would not be hard to overcome, considering the results
every time the topic of clean energy comes up in my life I think of this video
I love your way of explaining complex topics
Nuclear power is the way forward. You can’t be a proactive environmentalist without considering nuclear energy
I love the environment and Thorium is definitely the way to go. Solar panels are cool and all but they have to have batteries and all that fancy stuff where as nuclear can just keep going along with the fac that it is much more efficient and cheaper.
THORIUM ÜBER ALLES
Otto von Hammersmark Im an ethical thinker in regards to the environment and I agree fourth generation nuclear power such as thorium molten salt reactors and sodium-cooled fast reactors are the way to go, for clean plentiful energy.
Only degrowth and decentralized energy systems can be fair.
@@AmarzzAelin *a mini thorium reactor in every neighborhood, please*
"Well, Thorium is pimpin in that regard too"
Sam Wolfenstein *as well you mean
boi that is true
I refuse to believe this was posted in 2016. I remember watching it the day he uploaded 😵💫
Thorium also has a great refractive index so its fantastic to make camera optics with it
"Uranium sucks, it's kinda like that kid with ADHD."
*Cries Inside*
Ok ok off topic but what the fuck is a dinosgoroar
Yeah what is a Dinosgoroar?
A Akd oooh waitwait it’s three different words
Dinos go roar
@@lucasmucas9072 OOOOHHH! Thank you lol. I tried to search it on google xD
A Akd wow really
The thing is, Thorium isn't new. When nuclear reactor was first introduced Uranium was chosen precisely because it's by-product is essential to nuclear weapon. Back then where coal and oil are still the major source of energy the purpose of nuclear plant really was just needed to help making bombs.
Well to be fair, you can't make the plutonium needed for a thorium reactor without a uranium reactor.
ooooh that makes sense
I'll do you one better: The Soviets used to have thorium reactors, before switching to uranium precisely because of that reason
Correct! During the development of the nuclear reactor, Alvin Weinberg had a Torium reactor running for roughly 15,000 hours from 1965 to 1969. But the US discontinued this research because they settled on uranium. What a gigantic mistake.... Imagine if they didn't, the US would now be the world wide supplier of cheap, clean reliable energy.
Bjorn J nerd
2:40
cool forgotten scene for like, one frame here
What the hell is going on?
Put it on 0.25x speed to see for yourself, seems to be uranium releasing a bunch of radiation
You’ve convinced me to pick a side for a debate I didn’t even know existed.
Excuse me but there is a huge lack of Thor puns.
Aaron McEdgelord
Sam would probably just joke around how Thor is a Cripple. So.
if Thor make his own iron man suit he will be called Thorium man.
That's thorrible
well dont get thor about it
@@fangorn23 I almost thorgot my rage
China is the only country right now developing Thorium reactors. Apparently the reason I read that no other country does it is because since the technology is so different from traditional nuclear reactors that the regulatory agencies don't know how to regulate new plants and say that they are safe. I have no idea how true or not that is, but props to China for developing one of the most promising power sources on earth. Last I read they are making a mini LFTR and if it is successful they will scale up the size through a few generations until they have a full size plant.
Check your research, CANDU reactors can use thorium, and have been able to for decades.
Um actually China runs on coal
i think you mean india
The only thing India is developing are designated shitting streets
China have now put MSRs on the backburner and for thorium based cycles are instead focusing on a solid fueled pebble bed thorium reactor similar to India's reactors which won't even be finished until 2024 (bare in mind this will be a prototype reactor). It looks like they intend to continue work on the MSR experiment after that period so its presented itself a good opportunity for a western country to look into the technology in the meantime and begin working on a modern day MSRe before expanding upon the program. The MSRe built by oakridge national laboratories was the second ever (the first being the atomic plane prototype reactor that was scraped after ICBMs became viable) and the first true MSR. They built it from near scratch in only 5 years after which it was critical for another 4 years without fault, this was done on 80 million USD of funding (adjusted for inflation) with construction beginning in 1960.
As the BIG Peter Griffin said: WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS??
I’m writing a paper on nuclear energy and I’m quoting this video for a large majority of said paper, wish me luck.
Nuclear energy will never work, it doesn't have the votes in congress to pass. Democrats are not on board with nuclear energy and Republicans are not much better.
I got an A
You should have made plutonium stand beneath thorium acting as thoriums missing leg.
That would've been funny
Pine Cone a plutonium peg leg...that works
Plutonium has nothing to do with Thorium.
@@wbaumschlager you have to use the plutonium to get the energy out of the thorium
@@TTTodd Not at all. Thorium (which is fertile) just needs to capture a neutron to make it's way to U233 (which is fissile).
I support that
I may end up sending this to my uncle who reposted a video "thorium: a rock no one needs"
I had no idea the public discourse on thorium was so passionate.
Star Wars: Do it
Do it
did you do it
did you do it
My physics teacher played this video in class as part of our power production unit
5 years later and we're still waiting for a lot of thorium reactors to be made
It's almost as if worshipping and betting on one technology that isn't even feasible yet isn't such a great idea.
@@kanisch5825 it is feasible it's just that no one wants to make it
@@literallytheunitedstatesof1842 Yeah because no one wants to make something that would be objectively superior than the current thing. Everyone is baaaaad
@@literallytheunitedstatesof1842India just made one
@@user-tg3vq6qf6h That's good
Wow thorium is such a cool dude
he doesn't afraid of anything
you stole my line you beautiful person.
Damn thorium leave some pussy for us guys
Imma go out and buy thorium a drink.
But thorium’s kind of a cripple
India's entire nuclear energy program is geared towards producing nuclear energy from Thorium instead of Uranium. The only big issue is, as Sam mentioned, Plutonium. That's why current gen 'Fast Breeder' reactors are being developed, so that they can make enough Plutonium out of the conventional Uranium reactions. And as far as I have seen, India is the only country that is taking Thorium based nuclear energy seriously. It's really a fascinating thing to read about.
Probably doesn't hurt that India has 25% of the world's thorium reserves
Too bad India is basically a giant slum as of 2022. Maybe the future will be good to them.
Not a proper yt comment section without that one india comment💀
@@kl6544 Well, it's atleast relevant to the subject matter of the video. As far as I know, only India's nuclear program focuses on developing methods to extract energy from thorium on a commercial scale. Most of the other programs are either being defunded or reliant on traditional sources like Uranium.
@@MDMDMDMDMDMDMDMDMD That's correct.
Copied this for my 5th grade presentation and forgot to cut out the swear words. Best trip to the principals office ever.
Huh, I wonder why this suddenly got recommended?
I was hoping it's because Sam came back, but not yet. _Not yet..._
Me with ADHD seeing the part about ADHD kids: never before have I been so offended by something I, 100 percent agree with
also, Sam has very good points, shit like this is super interesting, i would recommend looking into nuclear reactors and how they work, basically they use the heat from the radioactive element to heat massive steam turbines
I just agreed, although instead of Ritalin it's Vyvanse
Same brother. I was like listen here... You... Fuck off
I was looking for this comment. I feel the same... adhd sucks
same bro.
You know what's worse? No uploads, I need my fix
This seems like one of those channels that should have like a million subs why doesn't it
Because it just started a few months ago. Give it time, like, 3-4 weeks and hes going to be up there
Toolman329 wow now its nearly 29 K
Toolman329 unsubbed because of this shit.
+Ben Phone wat?
Offroad circus he needs to start drama with another RUclipsr that will get his numbers up
DID THIS CRIPLE BEATER JUST CALL ME URANIUM????
thoriums so good that there was even a terraria mod named after them
Seems legit
I have presented this video in multiple consultations with energy holding groups... suffice to say that none have made a switch but one power plant changed it's front door locks so I can't keep going back talking about Thorium
This video is retarded, that's why. Thorium is a precursor decay product to Radium, the largest producer of radon gas. Bust out a chart of nuclides. 238 can be fed to breeder reactors, enrichment is only necessary to make weapons or special reactors. Thorium needs to be bred into Uranium 234, which has a virtually identical fission yield coefficient to 235. It produces the same nuclear waste.
@@chadthundercock7897 I'm pretty sure thorium has to be combined with plutonium and not uranium. Plus. Thorium does more work and is more efficient then uranium.
@@chadthundercock7897 For someone called Chad, you sure act like an angry ex against Thorium.
@@chadthundercock7897 There are currently 7 research reactors that use Thorium and they all use *Plutonium* to kick off the reaction just like the videos states. Takes about 10 seconds to google search that to prove you're wrong and the video right.
@@chadthundercock7897 God, you just got destroyed via academia.
"Thorium not weaponizable" *tapes thorium on a stick and beats people over the head*
Also, Three Mile Island had a death toll of... zero. That also includes zero excess deaths from any cause, including aftereffects of contamination.
Even 3 Mile Island wasn't something to worry about.
Kyle Hill's video is a great documentary about its effects, but really it released virtually no significant radiation.
Why don't you go there and find out
@@user-ei6qn1db7b Go to TMI? I may not remember exactly, but during the incident, the outside of the building recorded radiation levels on the same level as regular coal power plants do on the daily due to C-13. The increase in expected cancer cases due to fission product release to the environment is 0.5 people. A flip of the coin if even one nearby person ended up developing cancer due to that event, which is a lower risk than secondhand smoke.
Cold War-era governments (including ours) backed uranium-based reactors because they produced plutonium - handy for making nuclear weapons. And now its very expensive to switch to thorium.
That's why most nuclear power plants use uranium for those of you wondering.
Uranium still kicks ass compared to most alternative power sources.
www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/why-arent-we-using-thorium-in-nuclear-reactors
So cool how we spend our money and efforts to make those nukes we never use :)
@@Newlifestyle307 That's exactly where i got my info lol
@@xXNP4CNuclearXx idk if cool is the correct word ;)
This video and 30 minutes of research got me 100% on my ELA final
Worth noting when you watch this video- Democrats in congress hate nuclear energy including AOC and Bernie Sanders. Republicans on the other hand support nuclear energy pretty universally, with close to 70% of the Republican base supporting nuclear energy and basically all Republican elected officials believing the same. If you actually support nuclear energy you should ask people like AOC and Bernie Sanders why they don't, and put pressure on them to support nuclear. Nuclear energy can't be used if Republicans are the only ones supporting it, it won't have the votes to pass.
thats is incredible well done!
pog
nerd
Great job dude
Hey kids, I'm from 5 years in the future and I learned something new today. Thanks Sam O'nella
This video saved my science assignment, Thank You!
Honestly, if school teachers taught classes like this it would probably lead to an increase in grades, student productivity and kids actually wanting to go to school. It's entertaining and educational.
if only grades weren't so weighted in current schools, that's why people cheat on tests in the first place
I imagine this would be hard to keep up for at least 30 minutes a day. especially if you had to do it 5 days a week.
Not everyone is entertaining though, thats the thing
Mr. Scarecrow I doubt it. While an entertaining teacher can definitely make someone care about something, to an extent at least, it is not only unreasonable and impractical to have every class be taught in this style, but I don't think the teacher is usually the main reason students aren't engaged in school. Also, RUclips education misses the reinforcement stage of learning, so ultimately, not much would really change even if a teacher was like Sam O'Nella.
Basically, don't compare a RUclips video to school and the engagement of the student isn't solely (or even mainly) on the teacher.
It's more a primer than educational. It mentions conclusions without any details at all as if people were completely dumb.
But if it helps get the thinking caps on... why not.
Also if you put Thorium on a stick you can shoot cool magic bolts
I sense a Terraria ref
Just don’t pair it up with a calamity, too many OP weapons
@@MrMetropolis yeah
Nice
but only with some thicc Polonium
This video pretty much gave me an A on my physics test. Thanks Sam.
I’d never thought I would use this information.. but turns out.. I have to write an essay on Thorium.. thanks Sam for being there before I knew I needed you
one thing to note is that depleted uranium is great for tank armor.
U-238 is used for military they have tonnes of that around they don't need to use nuclear byproducts
1stgamerx I thought MGSV said it wasn't that good for tank armor...
Its better as armour penetrators. It is, though, very good radiation shielding.
1stgamerx and breaking said armor
Uranium is great for tank armor and penetrators, but when it penetrates or is penetrated it turns into EXTREMELY poisonous dust.
You want to know the saddest part that Nella forgot to mention?
The reason we don't have these plants is not because its too advanced for us, but because nobody wants to spend the money.
Imagine that, the next generation of fuel and energy sitting right there for anyone to take but they would rather burn all the oil in the world first.
"Hey, there's this Thorium thingy, let's use it!"
"But NUKES-"
"B-but it's the next generation of energy and f-"
*"NUKES"*
welcome to capitalism
@@thebiggestcheems Not so much capitalism as politically fueled corporations. Do you think Uranium would be given the time of day if governments didn't buy the stuff for weapons? The government is far more to blame than is the free market.
@@noahabel5698
Eh, get rid of em both I say.
@@thebiggestcheems Depends. Free market economics is fine. But the "capitalism" we have today is not free market economics by any stretch of the word. So if we were to discard current day economics, I'd be fine with it, as long as it was replaced with less governmental intervention. As it stands, the majority of corporations can exist solely because of the government. Sometimes it is because corporations manipulate the government. Sometimes it is because the government invests itself into corporations through bailouts, subsidies, tax breaks, etc. Most business in a free market would take place on a much smaller scale. Most being local or at most regional. The few that did become international would do so through sheer efficiency, and even then they couldn't stomp out competition as unfairly as corporations do currently.
thank you. using a shit ton of this info for my huge chem project due tomorrow that i just started tonight. you’re a good man.
Sometimes I look back on these videos and think about how much I miss him
0:31 "He's a lot like uranium, just a lot more chill"
Turns Thorium the color of supercritical plutonium.
it's also the color of ice, which is probably what he was going for.
Blue calms the mind so thats what it means to chill and vibe
The hottest fire is blue fire because it's in complete combustion
I don't think it's the plutonium that's supercritical here...
@@weirdTedE91 Good one
My name is Thorium. I’m 33 years old. My house is in the northeast section of Morioh, where all the villas are, and I am not married. I work as an employee for the Kame Yu department stores, and I get home every day by 8 PM at the latest. I don’t smoke, but I occasionally drink. I’m in bed by 11 PM, and make sure I get eight hours of sleep, no matter what. After having a glass of warm milk and doing about twenty minutes of stretches before going to bed, I usually have no problems sleeping until morning. Just like a baby, I wake up without any fatigue or stress in the morning. I was told there were no issues at my last check-up. I’m trying to explain that I’m a person who wishes to live a very quiet life. I take care not to trouble myself with any enemies, like winning and losing, that would cause me to lose sleep at night. That is how I deal with society, and I know that is what brings me happiness. Although, if I were to fight I wouldn’t lose to anyone.
Yoshikage Kira moment
iS tHIs a JOjO REfeReNce?
@@antivaxxerchild6170 No it's a mario kart reference.
@@antivaxxerchild6170 no it's titanfall reference
@@antivaxxerchild6170 no it's a warhammer 40k reference
this will help tremendously for my project thank you
I cited this video in my end-of-high-school research paper and got a 90