Which Silverado Engine Is Best? Let's Find Out!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- Today I compare all of the engine options available in the 2023 Chevrolet Silverado 1500. This is a comparison of the 2023 Chevy Silverado 1500 3.0L Duramax, 2023 Chevy Silverado 1500 2.7L Turbo, 2023 Chevy Silverado 5.3L V8, and 2023 Chevy Silverado 1500 6.2L V8!
Ask For Nick And Gage: www.larryhmill...
Learn How To Save Time And Money The Next Time You Buy A Car: benjaminhardy....
Help Support The Channel: www.patreon.co...
Second Channel: / @thebenhardyshow
Instagram: ben_hardypl
Facebook: @benhardycar
5k miles in on my 2023 LZ0 Duramax. It has been absolutely fantastic. I live in Colorado, and that turbo diesel is the way to go to maintain power at elevation. It tows amazingly in the high country, and the fuel economy is otherworldly for a full size
How good is it in cold weather
I love diesels, but with the emissions and the corrosive as hell def. I will never buy another one. Every issue with emissions costs a ton of money. And here's the kicker. 25 years ago you wouldn't even know it happened. Cis that shit wasn't on there
I'm a MOPAR guy but have always loved that 6.2. She's a beast and would be my first and last choice.
Yeah me too love the 6.2 think it's the best non supercharged v8,. That is unless Ram decides to put a 6.4 392 engine. Hello Ram make it and I will buy it.
@@thorpower1015 👍
@@thorpower1015 I put a 6.4 SRT in my single cab short bed ram…. They should’ve done it from the factory for sure! Way more power than my 6.2 chevy but they both have their purpose.
@@nateherd9335 sounds like fun
I e had three trucks with the 6.2 amd and it’s a beast ! 3.0 is great on mpg though. The only downfall of the 6.2 is it has to have 93 octane
I’m a retired G.M tech. I test drove the 4 cylinder Silverado and it is a pretty surprising engine.
Exactly, people need to get over the fact that the cylinder count is small. That is light a deep latent bias, that is not really valid when I have seen turbo'd 4's produce well over 500HP. The cylinder count thing changes with technology. Even the heftiest diesels are often just 6 cylinders. And then there is the durability argument. Sure Turbo's run hotter and durability will be an issue, but when, 200,000 miles. Do most people even drive the rigs that long and for that many years? Mostly "no". The Turbo Diesel 3.0L seems to be the sweet spot.
Did you cut your balls off as well?
I don’t doubt the 2.7 is a good engine, but the fact they put a four-cylinder in a full-size pick up truck just doesn’t sound right imo
I could be wrong but I feel like they mainly did it just for the fuel economy numbers "on paper" as they say. We all know it isn't guaranteed to have better real world MPG but automakers have been putting lower powered, or smaller displacement, engines in some models to improve their fleet fuel economy average. It's also the reason they put auto stop/start in damn near everything. JUST to look better by the numbers.
@@JasonYergin agreed
yeah i agree. They either need a V8 or a diesel i6
What does sound right is that it tows more that the 5.3 and people still think the 5.3 is a good engine😂
@@JasonYergin I remember hearing that the engine was intended for the Colorado, but the development of the third gen was delayed so they ended up putting it in the Silverado and some Cadillacs.
I’m gonna go for the 6.2 because of its remarkable performance and sound!!
Yea and Buy all that 93 octane Gas ! You Be lucky to afford the 4 banger !
I have a 2019 5.3 8-speed DFM Silverado. So far I really love the truck. In my opinion this engine hits the sweet spot of efficiency, power, sound, and drivability. GM has done a great job of coming up with a lineup of engines that seem to suit the needs of just about anyone's needs. I do like the diesel but between the premium cost to get it, plus the extra cost per gallon of fuel along with DEF fluid and the fact that maintenance will probably cost more than a gas engine, I would probably steer away from it unless towing were the main concern. The 6.2 makes great power but really requires premium gasoline. The 4 cylinder is an interesting option. I would like to see how it fairs for reliability over the coming years.
Transmission will go maintain i have put 2
The 4 cylinder has been around since 2019, so its proven itself already
I hated the 8 speed transmission, would have rather had the 6 or 10. Less than 30,000 miles on my 2020 RST and it started shifting rough in gears 1-3
Have the 5.3 and use it for work will be going the 6.2 next
Ben remember these trucks run on different fuel. Diesel better mileage but higher fuel cost. 6.2 premium 5.3 87 octane and 2.7 regular octane. More RUclipsrs need to explain this to people
We've put alot of miles on a pair of 6.2s buying 87 octane. You hear the occasional pinging if you listen real close. Fuel economy is about the same as 91 empty. Towing 91 is better i would say.
Agree. Cost per mile is the real key, but isn’t consistent with upgraded fuel having different markups in different locations. For example, diesel is $1.5 more than regular in NC right now.
@@BabyGators This is insanity, how gas can be cheaper than Diesel today, I remember 30 yeasr ago when people consider diesel as disposal waste and cost less than $2 per gallon. hope this not continue for so long.
@@sam79357 it is insanity, but you can thank absurd regulation for the swap in fuel prices. The amount of taxes on diesel don’t help either. It’s a shame because it’s much better, more energy dense fuel.
@@sam79357 $2 30 years ago is around $4-5 today. So your point means nothing when that’s about where diesel is at now
6.2 all day long, got one in my 22 Denali and absolutely love it, my second choice would be that Duramax my buddy has one in a Trail Boss and is getting 30.4 mpg and he loves his
Yea shure Ya do !!!
As much as I love the low end torque of the 3.0 duramax, it can't beat the sound of a 6.2 v8, that's probably the motor I would be going with if I didn't already have my 3.5 ecoboost expedition, great comparison ben!
6.2 seems like a great choice at the surface level but week to week, pumping premium fuel into the 6.2 doesn't seem like a great choice, especially because the 5.3 is a great option and is tuned for regular fuel.
The 6.2 sounds amazing. What an engine. I was surprised on how average the Duramax sounded.
Having driven a 6.2L Trail Boss for a thousand miles or so... it's amazing.
@@motoxrich1 I was running 89 Octane in my 2019 6.0L CHEVY van and it was 13 mpg then when I switched to 87 octane it went to 14 mpg
@@trailblazeratv6306 6.0 and 6.2 are different motors
The 6.2 Never Fail,No Contest,Unless There's A 3.42, A Max Tow Package With A 10 Speed,l Love The 6.2.
Same here
Guess I'm the only one here with a 2.7 silverado (2021). But, I love it. It has not disappointed me at all yet, with 28K miles on it. It's so easy to drive, and I almost forget it's smaller
lol..with all that money you saved you’re able to buy your wife’s boyfriend a duramax!
@@JackMeoff-zr4uo no kidding😂 he's actually the kind that thinks Mazda 3s are fast as they get.
We have a 21 4 banger as well. 70k miles and no issues so far. Drives great towing our boat and our camper even in the Tennessee hills.
If you’re going for fuel mileage, then Duramax is the way to go. I personally have always had the 6.2 L. You can’t beat the sound the feel of a 6.2 L V-8 I just couldn’t bring myself to get a diesel especially with the price of gas and people running out of diesel this year. Great review all good comments but I’ll keep the growl of my V8 😂😂
I have a Silverado with the 6.2 and Max Tow package and tow a 12000 lbs boat. No problem whatsoever towing the boat. I was amazed when I was on flat terrain I was only turm 1750 RPM at 72 MPH
How much for Gas tho ?
@@briantcruz3120 8-10 MPG
I went with the 5.3 myself. Worked out well for what I tow/haul. If they optioned the L8T 6.6 in the 1500 I would be tempted to buy another truck.
I would like to see the 6.6l when they sell as a crate, and how they handle forced induction. 😎
2.7 will outperform the 5.3
Bad choice. 2.7 tows more and has way more torque
I bought my truck in 2020 so it has 45 more horsepower and 35 more ftlbs of torque. Tow rating of 9800 pounds which is 3000 higher than the 2.7 of 2020. I also don't worry if the open deck design of the 2.7 will handle the 20-30 pounds of boost without cracking the engine block or failing a head gasket. Fords open deck 1.3, 1.6, 2.0 and 2.3s have had these issues for the past decade but whatever.
@@roblacerra3257
Can’t go wrong with a 5.3 it will outlast that 2.7
I love my 2.7, plenty of power.
I have A 5.3 Tahoe pulling a 19’ bass boat, and have just upgraded to a 6.2 Denali Yukon with Cat back exhaust. Have to say the extra HP is appreciated ! And the sound is GREAT!
I own two 3.0 durumax…hands down best diesel engine ever. I get 32-34mpg in my Silverado and 26-28Mpg on my Tahoe. Real joy to drive.
Agree completely, best engine/transmission combo I’ve ever owned and I’ve had them all.
I get 31 mpg highway in sport mode
@UpsForDays diesel will always have more expensive service and maintenance. If you are getting a 2022 and older model there is a rather pricey service at 140k-160k for a belt that needs to be changed and takes a ton of labour.
But 2023 they re-engineered it to dodge that labour cost.
@@upsfordays4662 maintenance is not bad at all. The gas milage and longevity will pay for itself. It like driving Honda civic that tows 9500lb…lol. I have two vehicles with 3.0 durumax no regrets.
They moved the oil belt to 200k miles, even on the 20-22 models
2.7 HO or the 3.0 Duramax all day for me. I've got a 2022 refresh with the 2.7 HO and its fantastic. Came from a few GM V8s and a Colorado 2.8 Duramax prior to it. The torque it delivers is meaty throughout, and the 5049lbs curb weight (crew cab short box 4x4) more than makes it peppy. Plus engine construction wise its all forged bottom end and tri metal bearings just like its diesel brethren. Your comparison on the 2.7 vs the 5.3 I've had the opportunity to verify on GPS based 0-60 timing. My 2019 old body 5.3 double cab (just shy 5400lbs curb) was good for 6.85 seconds to 60mph. My 2.7 HO (5049lbs) was 6.9 seconds.
Duramax makes sense for this type of vehicle.
Loved my 5.3❤
I test drove a 2022 with the 3.0 Duramax right after I bought a 2017 with the 6.2 and I'm here to tell you that 6.2 torque feels alot like the diesel, loving the gasser.
Last time I was at the Chevy dealer a salesman told me they were instructed to push the 2.7 because nobody wants one. It's pretty much all they had on the lot anyway. As for me, I made my decision in 2019 and went with the 6.2 with the 3.42 axle and max trailering package. The thing tows like a beast.
The 6.2 is quite fun also!
I think a lot of people are skeptical of the 4 cylinder engine. Many remember the “Iron Duke” Camaro’s from the 80’s, and assume that the new 4 cylinder trucks are underpowered and virtually useless when it comes to towing a trailer and doing truck things. They’re definitely not underpowered. But Chevy needs to convince people to try them!
My local dealer had six of the 2.7s on their lot when new vehicles were hard to come by. The salespeople were literally begging people to take them. I'm personally less scared of the 2.7 and more scared of the 8 speed that they pair it with.
Great comparison video Ben! Also, thanks for showing us the payload and towing stickers. Please do that in all your videos with vehicles able to tow. Thanks!
I have the 3.0L Duramax in my GMC and I love it. What I don't love is the check engine has come on three times already in one year of ownership.
Always use #2 diesel and max 5000 miles oil interval.
Additives, additives, additives. If I treat my fuel and oil I don't get the DPF related check engine lights. I used Hotshots EDT in the fuel and FR3 in the oil.
The added emi$$ion$ required by big brother on the diesels, plus gas being cheaper than diesel by about a buck a gallon in the NE, would have me opt for the 5.3. And I’m a diesel lover too.
@@breadn5556, terrible advice.
These modern diesels are all like this. Dealers do a TERRIBLE job of not explaining that they absolutely cannot just be driven around town. If you're not on the highway a lot, or at minimum driving in an area where you get long stretches without a traffic light or stop sign, then you are just asking for DPF issues. And you have to keep the oil changed at least twice as much as the manufacturers say you do...I never go more than 6,000 miles without an oil change.
Good review when I first thought of a new 22 Silverado I thought of getting the 2.7 after having 2 previous 5.3 but the fuel economy wasn't really any better than the 5.3. In Canada the 5.3 is about $2k over the 2.7, the 3.0 is about $700 more than the 5.3 but if you factor in that it comes with a block heater which is a $195 option on both the 2.7 and 5.3, $500 more is a no brainer to get the 3.0. My 22 order was never picked up but got a 23 with the LZ0 time will tell if it's as trouble free as my previous 5.3' s were but agree it's probably the best all around power train in a half ton pickup right now.
What is your fuel economy in Canada with the 5.3
I have a 24 duramax. My first diesel. Love this motor. It drives effortlessly. Smooth quiet and can tow almost anything. 30 mph on long trips. Seems like a no brainer.
The way the fuel mileage works on these trucks, you don't get a decent average until 20 miles into a trip.
Price,horse power,fuel mileage. . Take your pick ... Price is it for me. Fuel ,insurance, cost of ownership... 2.7lt RST thanks for the comparison.
Own a 15 Silverado 1500 LTZ Crew Max Tow 6.2L 8 spd 125k odo: cold air intake, resonator delete w/Magna Flow single exhaust, DFM delete, DiabloSport II 87 Tow tune. Averaging 60-75 MPH yields 19 MPG not towing; towing my 6.5k camp trailer at 65- 10 MPG. Live in southeast Idaho and to get anywhere, you're up and down grades. Didn't want to chance the 5.3L, Dirty Max too much $$$ for my need, and decided against 3.5L twin screw Ford due to buddy having to replace turbos at 140k ($8k). Very pleased with my Bow Tie!
My husband is a Chevy guy. We currently have a 2021 with the 6.2. We were Leary of it as we alway had the 5.3s. What I can say is our 6.2 gets better gas mileage than our last with the 5.7. The 10 speed transmission does make a difference. We have been pleasantly surprised!
What mileage do you get?
@@ktpinnacle on a recent trip to the coast we averaged 24 mpg. Around town around 20 mpg. We had an Avalanche (2012) that we loved with the 5.3 and were lucky at times to get 20 on highway trips. 17 in the city.
@@loriguinan2206 Really impressive for a 6.2. No lead foots in that family. My 2001 Yukon has a 5.3 that I have to hypermile to get 17 on the highway.
Yep def you should see how good mpgs can be with 5.3 with dfm. Pretty good for a crew cab truck and running 87 octane.
You can thank Ford for that 10 speed
One question that might be a good point about this motor on GM trucks is range. If range matters and GM still hasn't kept up with the competition with a larger fuel tank offering, this is the only way to get a longer range. So, if that matters, this is another benefit and/or factor in the ROI discussion
I'm more interested in the longevity aspect of these engines. I'm a mechanic on a fleet of around 30 Isuzu box trucks with the GM 6.0 engines. Half of which have over 300,000 miles on them. I have my doubts we'd have the same results with them turbo 4 cylinders.
That 6.0 gas was one of GMs best engines ever. Darn near bulletproof. Almost bought a 06 1500 Hd with the 6.0 once. I should have. I’m curious to see how the new 6.6 gas in the 2500 is going to fair long term.
I have a 6.2 and a 3.0. I wouldn't recommend the 3.0 for your average short trip grocery getter. The 6.2 is really fast and it sounds great with a cat back. The 10 speed in my 3.0 grenaded at 54k. I run the 3.0 as a work truck, it gets a 150+ miles a day and idles all day. It's perfect for that.
Hi Ben , big fan of your channel. Here’s a suggestion for a in the future, down the road video. Re-do this comparison test with all four power train options and give a update of j h ow they aged in feel, drive ability, and mileage. Plus see if you can determine how each power train held up and their costs. Just a thought…..
Bill
Duramax here and happy with it. 2023 LT Silverado crew cab 4x4. I gave it a 4inch lift with 35s. Truck is great.
I went with the (GMC) 5.3L. This was after owning the 6.6L Duramax in my 06 2500HD. Honestly LOVED that 6.6L and if I thought I'd do even half the towing I used to, I would of gone with probably the 3.0 Duramax. I'll admit the spike that Diesel took also scared me off.
What a waste of money. Rolling pile of crap.
Return it or sell it. Lifter will go out before 100k and kill your engine
I just traded my 2018 Sierra 5.3L loved it until start consuming oil at 60k miles now I have 2023 Silverado 3.0L Duramax 2nd generation and love everything about this baby diesel
I test drove a 2.7 sierra a couple weeks ago. Wasn't impressed. Turbo sounded like a Jetsons car so I wonder if all was working right. Heard a tapping with revs... Couldn't tell if it was injector noise or lifter noise. Either way, it didn't do anything to convince me it was worth any attention. Real world mpg isn't much better than 5.3, often worse. Towing mpg is easily beaten by every other engine option. Extra complexity of a turbo makes me worry about long term reliability.
Had more than one 6.2L and they have problems as well. Lifter collapsed at 64k miles and destroyed the motor. In a LZ0 now and love it. Wont compete with the 6.2L with noise and pure go but it has a ton of grunt and is quiet and smooth. No such thing as a perfect engine from any manufacuter.
Spent 3 years driving my 2020 with the 2.7 and never missed the V8. In over 22k, the truck averaged 20.1MPG total. New 23 is also a 2.7 but the extra 82flbs of torque are immediately noticeable. For me, with the current price of these trucks, the deals on the 2.7 were an easy choice. That being said, I lease so no warranty issues but I would be concerned about long term ownership. Also, the reprogrammed 8 speed trans is definitely improved over the 2020 version.
The v8 will almost the same mileage. Much more reliable and long lasting
@@freedomliberty7611 I agree, but I'm leasing it. I saved about 3K because it's the turbo.
@@jnmcs You didn't save anything. Leasing guarantees you will have a car payment forever. You are burning money to borrow a vehicle.
My V6 Toyota SUV gets 28 mpg average, 30+ on the highway. These smaller engines are cheaper to produce, get worse gas mileage and will die far sooner than a proper V6 or V8.
@@tx611 Opinions vary.
@@tx611 Your Toyota is junk though, just like you.
Bought a 22 Silverado and got the 6.2 and I couldn't be happier. I was tempted by the diesel but I love it
6.2 hands down. Then 2.7Turbomax all day over the 5.3
The LT based small blocks (6.2 & 5.3), despite the DFM lifter issues are the most solid choices for the average person. The 2.7 is a solid engine but towing or hauling it would be pushed to its limit, excess stress on an engine does not help longevity at all. The 3.0 diesel seems to be the most risky choice, good on fuel yes, solid torque output for towing and hauling, but the engine seems to have the most issues out of all of them with EGR and high pressure fuel pump failures.
I tow with it everyday, stop fucking lying to people
The days of charging msrp are about to come to an end.
They already have. US car manufacturers are about to have a very very rude awakening. 2023 will be one of the worst years on record for GM, Ford & Dodge.
@@leftycosta1899 Unfortunately for the consumer gm has finally figured out the law of supply and demand. They are no longer flooding the dealers lots, keeping supply low keeping them from throwing money on the hood to move inventory.
Loved my 6.2 L Trailboss
Love my 6.2 but unfortunately everyone must install a pulsar Lt to feel the power. I've had it for over a year and it is a rocket.
Or just drive it in L9 instead D (in fact I'm doing this for 6 months now. I can feel the difference when I shift back to D to drive short distances)
The Pulsar LT is a nice tool for throttle sensitivity. But a tuner will give you that same option while actually adding power. I love my Superchips tuner on my '21 6.2 Trail Boss!
@@craigstark2712how much horse power did you gain, I've dealt with tuners a bit before with mixed reviews.
@@thorpower1015 they claim up to 45 horse to the tires in the mid range on 93 octane, peak about 17 horse. I don't have 93 around here so around 35 horse for me. I can definitely feel the difference though!
@@craigstark2712 cool I may check it out
All my GM trucks have had the 5.3 and none of them ever had any issues. My current 5.3 has almost 200k miles on it and the only thing I ever had to do was replace an oil pump. I did test drive the new 3.0 and it ran really nice. It had plenty of torque but it was so quiet. I love the V8 rumble. Plus diesel is more expensive plus the additional cost of oil changes and DEF makes me think there is another 5.3 in my future.
I have the 3.0 Its sweet The MPG is great
I love my 2024 ltz 5.3 feels a crap ton more powerful those 10 speeds put in work
Every body always talks about the greater fuel economy of diesel motors but ignores all the other costs associated with diesels. If you do the math, especially including the massive purchase price increase, diesels will always cost you more when you include the other expenses. By a significant margin too. However, if you are towing large heavy trailers frequently, then yes the diesel is the best option. Very few people driving 1500's will ever recoup the money of buying diesels. In fact I bet in 1500's, 99% will never recoup the money.
You’re forgetting the diesels have higher resale value than their gasoline counterparts
When I bought my '21 Sierra 1500 with the duramax, the duramax was less than $2500 more than the 5.3. Not to say the fuel economy will make up for it, but it's not the massive $10k-$12k upcharge you see on the heavy duty trucks.
I ordered a Denali Ultimate a month ago and the 6.2 is a $995 option, the diesel is cheaper in the higher trim levels.
The Duramax has its advantages over the gassers but when you factor in the upgrade cost and $1 more per gallon then not so much.
Also they are plagued with a bunch of problems I just got rid of mine had multiple no starts no crank tdc emissions. I’m not the only one either there’s a bunch of people complaining about them on RUclips
6.2 with the Borla Atak cat back = 😁
I have a 2018 5.3 and couldn't be any happier with this truck
I drove demo 5.3 with 10 speed trans. I was pleasantly surprised with torque, sound and efficiency. However I will be going with diesel as it has incredible range on the same size tank. If it wouldn’t be for long distance trips, 5.3 with 10 speed would be in my driveway.
U don't buy a truck for fuel economy!
I have the 5.3 but installed Pulsar LT to disable DFM AFM. Straight 8 all the time. The gas mileage sucks but it’s got all the power I need. Can spin 33s no problem
2022s, 5.3 do not have DFM…6.2 does
I had the 2022 2.7 ho custom, and do to a couple events I ended up trading in for a 2023 1500 LT Z71 5.3. And can honestly say I still respect the 2.7 ho but the 5.3 feels like a way more solid truck. I have some video clips of my 2.7 (I pulled almost max weight and put 7k miles on it before trade in) I plan to do a real comparison for real everyday use and ownership
The 5.3 sucks
@@justinh1258 lol
@@tattoomagic6110 lol all you want, I’ve owned 3 of them
@@justinh1258 and plenty of people other then yourself have owned and then like them. And you most be a slow learner if it took 3 to make you say they suck. But I only keep my trucks while under warranty so I’m not worried. And you know you don’t have to put a engine down to enjoy the one you have. I’ve owned and pulled max with my old 2.7 ho, like I said I had no complaints with the 2.7. I honestly looked at a 2.7 lt but I don’t like the 8 speed. But we all have opinions.
@@tattoomagic6110 I’ve never had major problems with a 5.3, it’s an old and underpowered motor made unreliable and worse by afm. Cope
My pick is 5.3l. Maybe turbo 4 depends on truck.
The 2.7 L towing more than the 6.2 L could possibly have something to do with the special shocks in the ZR2 compared to the shocks in the trail boss.
I've had a 2019 Sierra SLT (5.3), 2021 SLT (6.2) and a 2023 SLT (3.0 Diesel), and I love the diesel for its torque, acceleration and mileage. My only complaint is the exhaust is too quiet. I'm getting 24 mpg around town, 33 on the highway at 70mph and did a trip from Toronto, Ontario to Halifax, Nova Scotia and averaged 42 mpg at 65 mph. Here diesel is a buck cheaper than regular and 2 bucks cheaper than premium in gallons. The best I ever got with the 5.3 or 6.2 was 26 mpg, and the 6.2 needed premium. And it' way better to tow with.
I have a 2020 Sierra w/ 5.3, seems very good all around and my consistent mpg Ave is about 16.5 , which I think is weak. If I would do it over I’d go w 6.2. The 4 c turbo probably seems cool at first but just sounds like a long term problem that will be very expensive
viking guru
When talking about the miles per gallon, you really need to do a cost per mile. Yes, the diesel gets more miles per gallon but when you factor in the cost per gallon of diesel and the additives, then it’s a closer call.
Great video. Do you think the DFM is responsible for the lifter issues the 5.3 and 6.2 have been experiencing?
Could be
Definately, happened to a family members 2022 GMC with the 6.2, it only had 36,000 miles on it.
The guy works for a Chevrolet dealer. He's not going to tell you anything negative about the product if he wants to keep his job. Duh.....
@@wesfudge Thank you for clarifying that for me.
I like the 2.7 easier and lighter not weighted down
I traded my 22 Raptor for a 23 1500 At4 Diesel and couldn’t be happier. The raptor felt extremely cheap for an 85k truck. Also had a bunch of issues with it. Ford needs to get their stuff together or they’ll be in serious trouble.
Same but traded my raptor for a TRX
Ive had an 09 Denali with the 6.2 AWD and i cant imagine having any other powerplant. Im in the market for something else right now and not looking for anything other than a 6.2. Hell of a good engine. Right before they put AFM b.s. in em.
Loved my Duramax for towing and torque with Allison!! Now I have the 6.2 , 10 speed for the ride and speed/acceleration!!
I've had 6.6, 6.0, 6.2, 5.3 and now 3.0. The 6.2 was fun and towed my 7k lb. trailer fine. But the 3.0 does it just as well and saves money on fuel. YES, it cost more to fill it up due to prices, but you further and fill up less than on fuel. Therefore, it's actually less expensive on fuel. I average 27/31driving just as I did in any other truck. I do utilize the auto shut off feature while in the city (red lights). Towing it gets around 18-20
I really like the 6.2 10 speed in my AT4. I am 72 and I frequently get a big smile on my face when I drive. The 5.3 6 speed in my Suburban was ok until I got the pickup. Now it seems slow. I am at about 1000 feet elevation.
if you want it to last forever with least problems get the 5.3
I have a at4 6.2 carbon pro
Had the lifters replaced by gmc for free cause they were undersized . Once replaced I've had no problems.
Great engine.
Only wish I have is that the front end needs to be carbon just like the back
Save 100 pounds on the front .
was considering an EV but then gas stabilized and with the past winter report of EVs not hold charge in cold weather, that was the final straw since i live in a cold state.
Heard there’s problems with the diesel engines so I ordered a 6.2 with my new high country 👍🏻
Every engine has "problems" arise. Not sure the Duramax has many issues. They did a revision to make it better but none of the reported issues were big. The 6.2...if I am not mistaken may be in a class action suit for lifter issues. Could be the 5.3 as well? But if true...thats a "problem"
Good choice
I’ve got a 2018 Denali with the 6.2 and my twin brother has a 2020 at4 with the 3.0. We both pull bass boats and they both do that no problem. When it’s time to pass another vehicle I’ve got more confidence getting eastbound and down with my gas vs his diesel.
Yes, he gets better fuel economy, but my 6.2 has gotten 26mpg @ 65mph on the I40 which ain’t bad and the trade off with premium fuel vs cost of diesel I still come out ahead and if it’s any kind of drag race…
Love my 2.7. Doesn’t have lifters to fail like the v8. Easily tows my 5500# trl.
But your turbo on the 2.7 will not last long and the truck is useless then😮
You got it right, for fuel usage, towing up to 10,000 #, you have to go with the Baby Duramax. Sad GM has no real competition with this powertrain class any longer. It took Ram awhile but they got their VM Motor EcoD working great starting in 2020.
I bought a 23 Silverado with a 3.0 I’m averaging anywhere from 25 to 30 miles a gallon the epa underrated the fuel economy of that truck
I think they did on pretty much all of them. I just got a Denali Ultimate with the Duramax this week so I haven't had it long enough to know much but I have had plenty of the v8s and I def get better numbers with them then what is claimed. Hell even running flex fuel I am positive the numbers are better and I think you are supposed to loose up to 20% mileage running it. I only ever buy it since it used to be $1 cheaper per gallon but last I got it in March the price was only like $0.30 cheaper so might as well just buy 87 if you aren't saving much while losing mileage.
The best truck is the one that will do what you need it to without wasting money for no reason. The 2.7 and 5.3 perfect light/medium towing. And occasional heavy towing. (By heavy, I mean close to max towing). And Daily driving. Now I see everyone thinking they need the 6.2 or 3.0l diesel. 6.2 takes premium fuel. The hp, torque, and mpg claimed by gm is based off 93 octane. I hear ppl putting 87 in the 6.2, but then ur not getting the most of what you paid extra for. And paying 70k for a truck that uses premium fuel, I would at least run 91 in it regardless. In northern MN, it's a .92 difference between 87 and 91, so if you fill up once a week, that's around $20-$25 extra a week. So if having a bigger engine than the guy at the stop light next to you is worth the extra cost, congrads on being able to do so. I think the 6.2 is worth it if towing a lot and not wanna go with a diesel. Now, the 3.0 diesel would be for someone who tows a majority of the time. They cost more to maintain but ultimately last longer, and diesel fuel costs more but does get better mpg. Do the math with price of gas/diesel with mpg of each vehicle and maitenaince costs on both to see which is more cost effective, gas or diesel. We live in a society where bigger is better and don't think logically. Remember, at any time, fuel could go through the roof again. What works for you, might not for other. Some ppl look at the cost of operation, and that is the deciding factor. Not trying to degrade any engine, they are all great, just displaying facts on how some ppl choose a powertrain that best fits their needs. This is how I decided to go with the 5.3
I will stick with 1999 5.3 Vortex. Still runs like the day I brough it 24 years ago
Yeah no shit right
6.2 V-8.
I own a 2.7 TurboMax and honestly! It’s not bad at all, it feels super light handles really well, it’s almost like your driving a Civic Type R but on a full size truck !!!😂
For long term the turbo will crap out ,iff your leasing who cares or have bumper to bumper can’t beat naturally asperated v8
Love my 2023 5.3 10 speed; luxurious ride with plenty of pulling power. 6.2 L is cool but hard to find and needs premium.
Get the AFM disabled or start saving for replacing the cam and lifters...
Just swapped my 2018 5.3l for a 2024 Duramax 3.0. Max tow. It’s the way to go. The little 2.7 only produces high torque at an impractical operating rpm. The Duramax does so at very practical range. Imagine pulling your camper up 20 miles of mountain grades.
2.7 I4 turbo produces 430 ft lbs torque @ 3,000 rpm's. 5.3 V8 produces 383 ft lbs torque @4,100 rpm's. 3.0 diesel produces 495 ft lbs torque. 25% higher fuel costs + def. Diesel is only .3 larger displacement engine than I4 turbo. Few rebates/incentives.
It's what ever works best for the individual
Awesome video this helped me decide on which size pickup I'm going with, thanks for the video review.
If diesel was not inexcusably expensive, that Duramax would be a great truck to own.
The 3.0 Duramax is my pick as well. Only wish Chevy offered that engine in the regular cab configuration. That would be my dream truck!
Get that 2.7t in the canyon or Colorado where it will shine! Of course I’d rather gm give us the option of stuffing a 6.2 in one😊
If diesel prices were relevant to gasoline prices at the pump, 3.0 all day.... but they aren't. Diesel costs almost twice as much at the pump where I live, I really don't understand why people are so excited about their 3.0 MPG's. If the fuel costs you twice as much to get you those MPG's, and the engine costs more from the factory as well as the regular maintenance, DEF Etc... Definitely doesn't make much sense to get the 3.0L. Its a simple math equation, cost of ownership over a year(s). I don't care if a truck gets 100 MPG, if the fuel cost is $1,000 dollars/gallon it doesn't really matter does it? You'd have to put on a LOT of miles for the MPG benefit of diesel to make sense financially, much more than average annual mileage for most people. At that point... do you really need a full size truck if you're putting on those kind of miles? 5.3L makes the most sense to me financially, and you're still getting a V8 with capability/sounds good.
I prefer the 5.3…because it is a V8 with plenty of power, and it comes in more affordable packages than 6.2💯✔️🇺🇸👍🏽
V-8 for me
3 phase sliding cam shaft and a dynamic fuel management system that give you more power when you need it. But also can slide to get you better fuel economy, won't show well if you are flooring it.
Also the lift and less gas in tank = less fuel efficient.
Own a Duramax 3.0
Torquey as heck . Fuel economy is great plus in a full sized truck and able to tow . Best bang for your buck. Plus if you idle a lot diesel is the way to go . Hands down
Idling is the worst thing you can do to modern diesels, it will plug the dpf much faster requiring more regens.
I traded in my 14 5.3 for a 20 3.0 Duramax. I will never go back to a 5.3l. it's just all around better in every way. Except the towing capacity of course.
1. Duramax 2. 6.2 . Wouldn’t even bother with the other two.
after watching mechanic reviews of the duromax, especially the fact that engine is set basically backwards where all the maintenance issues are on back of motor, and the fuel pump will need replacing every 100k,, and Def, and diesel costing an average of 50 cent more plus the fuel filter cost,,, I m sticking with V8 gas 6.2
When dealers and GM puts down their crack pipes and comes back to reality, me and my 197,000 mile Chevy 1500 5.3 will keep rolling on
Love this product want 3/4 ton for my work and my trailer❤❤
The 2.7 makes the 5.3 irrelevant... my choice would be the 6.2